APPENDIX 4 ARROYO MODELING

Similar documents
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

Hydrologic Calibration:

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

River Processes River action (fluvial)

Introduction. Keywords: Oil Palm, hydrology, HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS. a * b*

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

Flood Control Planning Below Alluvial Fans

Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville. November Prepared by

Watersheds. A river is the report card for its watershed. Alan Levere. Arizona Water Issues 2010 The University of Arizona HWR203 1

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

2

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Figure 1: Overview of all AutoCAD generated cross-sections.

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Scope of Work Lower Arroyo Grande Creek Flooding Analysis

FAST WATER / SLOW WATER AN EVALUATION OF ESTIMATING TIME FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

JD 14 Project Area Project Team Meeting

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Technical Memorandum No River Geometry

Note that the Server provides ArcGIS9 applications with Spatial Analyst and 3D Analyst extensions and ArcHydro tools.

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM SWPPP APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST

CALCASIEU PARISH ENGLISH BAYOU BASIN STORMWATER MASTER PLAN. NTB Associates, Inc. Solving Tomorrow's Problems Today...

Stream Reaches and Hydrologic Units

Stormwater Review Part 2. Rainfall and Runoff. Tom Seybert, PE and Andy Bennett, PE. Pennsylvania Surveyors Conference 2019

Flood Hazard Assessment of Potential Growth Areas Palmerston North City: Ashhurst

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

APPENDIX J-3 Technical Report on Airport Drainage, Northern Sector Airport and Ordinance Creek Watershed, Airport Creek Hydrologic Models

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Flood Resiliency Management Plan

Hydrology and Water Management. Dr. Mujahid Khan, UET Peshawar

HYDROLOGY CHECKLIST FOR LAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Technical Memorandum

Estimation of Infiltration Parameter for Tehri Garhwal Catchment

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

Environmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them

DRAFT. Jacob Torres, P.E.; Nick Fang, Ph.D., P.E.

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP Chapter 290: WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article IV: Stormwater Management

Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Drainage Report. New Braunfels Municipal Airport. Master Plan Update 2005

Revisiting the BMP Removal Rate Adjustor Curves. Mike Hickman PA DEP

INSTALLATION AND HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE OF THE PENN STATE LOW HEAD WEIRS

DESIGN GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL A. Slope Criteria

Hydrologic Engineering Center. Training Course on. Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS. Davis, CA. Course Description

Training Course Brochure Building Capacity in Rural & Urban Water Management

TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Subdivision Application Minimum Submission Requirements

CHOLLA POWER PLANT BOTTOM ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_Inflowflood_003_

Primer introduction to watershed management Plan Process highlight the major steps of plan development Project types look at some examples of common

Hydrologic Engineering Center. Training Course on. Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS April 2018 Davis, CA. Course Description

SAW MILL RIVER DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS AT RIVER PARK CENTER

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

Computer Determination of Flow Through Bridges

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1500 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

Chapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements

Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines for Stream Crossings

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek

San Francisco State University Site 1 Vegetated Infiltration Basin Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

Sunset Circle Vegetated Swale and Infiltration Basin System Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

Appendix VI: Illustrative example

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Introduction to Hydrology, Part 2. Notes, Handouts

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

Alternative Approaches to Water Resource System Simulation

Cokato Lake (86-263) Wright County. Hydrologic Investigation

Beaver Brook Flood Study

Chapter 6 Erosion & Stormwater Study Team

Suspended Sediment Discharges in Streams

CE Hydraulics. Andrew Kennedy 168 Fitzpatrick

APPENDIX P Project-Specific WQMP Checklist

DRAINAGE STUDY CROWS LANDING INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK. Stanislaus County. Prepared by:

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Georgia s Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria The Old, the New, and the Misunderstood

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

The prioritization list along with the estimated probable construction cost and future cost index is shown in Table 1.

Simulation of Daily Streamflow

Amina Reservoir Project Report

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW th Ave NE Ham Lake, MN 55304

ASSESSMENT OF DRAINAGE CAPACITY OF CHAKTAI AND RAJAKHALI KHAL IN CHITTAGONG CITY AND INUNDATION ADJACENT OF URBAN AREAS

Hydrostatistics Principles of Application

Hypothetical Flood Computation for a Stream System

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Transcription:

APPENDIX 4 ARROYO MODELING The existing HEC-HMS model can serve as a baseline for further development and analysis of major arroyos in the city. The model would need to be updated and expanded to consider areas upstream of the flood control dams. Data sets that would be needed to complete this task include, but are not limited to, topography, land use, rainfall, and soil type. It is important to carefully define the boundaries of the major arroyo under analysis, and to use 2-foot contour lines where possible. Contour lines aid in the determination of flow patterns by defining the behavior of crest points that separate flow directions within the watershed. Contour maps that are then projected onto soils maps provide important information about infiltration and runoff behavior, and can be used for informed decision-making about development adjacent to major arroyo systems. Soils are also a determining factor for vegetation, which also is a factor for hydrologic behavior as well as sediment transport and erosion control. The hydrologic model can be tightly coupled with a hydraulic model that would take the 100-year or 500- year storm hydrograph from the hydrologic model and map the extent of the water surface for such events. A model that has been used to a limited extent for this purpose in Las Cruces is the HEC-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model. Again, a new or expanded model would need to be built upstream of the flood control dams. The output water surfaces from this model would then be imported into a GIS system. The USACE has built tools to facilitate data transfer from HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS to ArcGIS, although other GIS systems could be used. Sediment transport functions within hydraulic models or other sedimentation models could also be generated to predict erosion along arroyos and adjacent areas. Erosion control strategies could include natural-based materials such as rocks/boulders and drought-tolerant vegetation as opposed to concrete where applicable. Using GIS mapping software, the aerial extent of water at the 100-year and 500-year storm could be evaluated for the presence of wildlife, proximity of a parcel to other identified open space, existing infrastructure like roads, power lines, water lines, gas, etc., and proximity to existing developments and privately owned parcels within the 100-year flood zone. Existing and proposed zoning may also be evaluated. Although HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS are free software tools that are publically available and frequently used in this type of work, there are many other available software packages that can perform the same analysis. The Sandhill Arroyo area is used in the following example.

This image shows part of a watershed basin map for the Sandhill Arroyo in the City of Las Cruces. A watershed basin map utilizes the best contour data available to map the entire watershed associated for a particular arroyo. Two-foot contours are used in this model. The watershed is a drainage basin and its topography dictates the direction of stormwater flows and ultimately where the arroyo stormwater eventually reaches. The red lines represent the sub-basin boundaries which are individual basins isolated based on contour data. The blue lines represent the flow line within that sub-basin.

Close-up of locations of interest Using HEC-HMS, a model can be developed to represent the arroyo under analysis. HEC-HMS allows engineers to use different values to determine the peak flow rates and volumes of stormwater at different locations of interest along an arroyo. The engineer can analyze for different storm events based on storm data available, and can compare different storm analysis methods if desired. Elements are added to the model to represent a sub-basin, dam, pond, junction etc.

Close up of cross section points. HEC-RAS is the next step towards determining a flood zone boundary after the flow rates are determined in HEC-HMS. This image shows the cross sections that are inputted into HEC-RAS. Each green line represents a cross-section of the arroyo, while the red line represents the arroyo flow path. Each cross section utilizes contour data. A cross-section basically shows what the arroyo would look like if you were to stand in the arroyo and look either upstream or downstream. This information is needed so the flow limits can be modeled.

These images show the flow limit results in HEC-RAS. The blue is an illustration of what the water level would theoretically look like in the event that the arroyo is carrying flow as a result of the storm analyzed in HEC-HMS. Each one of the cross sections inputted into HEC-RAS will have its own water level determination. These cross sections are plotted on a graph showing the lengths horizontally and vertically, to give the viewer an idea of the amount of water in the arroyo. The edges of the blue would be considered the flood zone boundary for that specific storm.

These images show the flood zone determination. The arroyo peak flow rates at different points along the arroyo determined in HEC-HMS for the design storm are inputted into HEC-RAS along with crosssection data to determine the flood zone boundary. Once the flow is modeled in HEC-RAS, the cross section lines are drawn on an aerial photo in AutoCad, and the HEC-RAS results for the flood limits are then traced onto the aerial photo to determine the flood zone. The red lines represent the old 100-year flood zone. The dark blue lines represent the new 100-year flood zone based on the study. The light blue lines represent the 500-year flood zone as a result of the study.