Congest-Shun. Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Similar documents
Urban Mobility and the Cost of Congestion (Getting the Public Engaged in Solution Discussions)

Telling the Truck Freight Mobility Story: Measures and Findings

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

State Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. National Conference of State Legislatures November, 2007

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Travel Time Index: Why All the Fuss? Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

9.0 Meeting the Challenges

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

Transportation System Management & Operations (TSM&O)

TOSTADA Data Integration Framework (TOol using STAcked Data)

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Environment Roundtable. October 13, 2015

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

Using INRIX Data in Iowa. Kyle Barichello, Iowa DOT Skylar Knickerbocker, InTrans

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

Section 5: Performance-Based Planning

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Speaker s notes for Rethinking our Path to Mobility presentation

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links

10.0 Congestion Management Process

National Performance Research Data Set (NPMRDS): Travel Time Probe Data. Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

National Performance Measure Target Recommendations

Performance Based Planning and Federal Target Setting. Transportation Policy Board September 13, 2018

Transportation Spending and Job Creation. February 2011

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MAP-21/FAST Act Performance Measures and Targets. MEETING DATE: September 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 4H

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Introduction. National Performance Requirements. Addressing Performance in Mobility 2045

Introduction. National Performance Requirements. Addressing Performance in Mobility 2045

PROTECTING Our Quality of Life... Why the Capital Region Needs to Invest in Mass Transit NOW

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Appendix E. Congestion Management Process. Congestion Management Process

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

NJTPA Region. Bergen Essex Hudson Hunterdon Jersey City Middlesex Monmouth Morris. Newark Ocean Passaic Somerset Sussex Union Warren

SECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

Examining the Economic Trade-offs of Alternative Transportation Funding NC I-95 Economic Assessment

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

Transit Service Guidelines

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO)

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO)

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

THAT Council adopt the Congestion Management Strategy as outlined in this report

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plan: Breaking the Gridlock

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

Contents. Introduction 1

TAMING BIG DATA FOR SMARTER FUTURE

Active Direction to Managing Transportation ATDM: Ohio s Perspective

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Integrated Corridor Management --An Overview --

INVESTMENT SCENARIOS CHAPTER Illustrative Investment Approaches Public Outreach 6-1

Policy Research CENTER

Developing a Methodology for Deriving Cost Impacts to the Trucking Industry that Generate from Freight Bottlenecks

Regional Transportation Performance Measures

Congestion Management Strategy

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Meeting Round 1

Chapter IX Regional Performance

MOBILITICS. Scenario Planning and Modeling Connected & Automated Vehicles. June 12, 2018

RTC Position on Pavement Condition Targets

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Current Trends in Traffic Congestion Mitigation

From Breakout Discussions

Appendix L Greenhouse Gas 4-part Strategy

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

Incorporating TMS into Planning. Jianming Ma, Ph.D., P.E.

APPLES TO APPLES: MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF TRANSIT AND ROADWAYS EQUIVALENTLY

University Transportation Center Conference for the Southeastern Region

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

CIRCULATOR STATUS UPDATE PRESENTATION JUNE 22, 2015

The Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION FACTS ECONOMIC IMPACTS

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE TRENDS

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSM&O) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT SIX

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

EXAMPLES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES HOW TO ESTIMATE THE BENEFITS OF THE CTR PROGRAM

The Many Dimensions Of America s Congestion Problem And A Solution Framework

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Public Input from Regional Visioning Forums

Policy Research CENTER

GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Transcription:

Congest-Shun An SEC Rival Discusses Mobility Data & How It Might Be Used to Design and Market Transportation Projects 58 th Annual Transportation Conference February 2015 Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute http://mobility.tamu.edu

Project Design, Selection & Marketing More diverse set of project proposals More diverse information needs also include: Legislative mandate Agency accountability and transparency initiative Funding increase proposal Projects focused on problem locations Data and analysis needs Proactive public relations for the agency Maintain visibility of transportation

Congestion is Worse in Cities of All Sizes But the Recession Has Caused a Reset Delay per Commuter 60 50 40 1982 1997 2011 Very Large = 3 M + Large = 1 M - 3 M Medium = 500 K - 1 M Small = Below 500 K 30 20 10 0 Small Medium Large Very Large

Slide 4 Birmingham Rush Hour $460 Million Congestion Cost 35 Hours Delay per Commuter $775 Per Commuter Wasted Fuel 10 Million Gallons in 2011 Severe 14% Heavy 16% 2011 Total Delay = 21 Million Hours Extreme 5% Light 20% Also: Huntsville, Mobile, Montgomery, Tuscaloosa Moderate 43%

Slide 5 Congestion Has Many Causes Special Events/Other 5% Poor Signal Timing 5% Bad Weather 15% Bottlenecks 40% Work Zones 10% Traffic Incidents 25%

% Varies for Each City Slide 6 100% But No Single Solution Accept Some Congestion Diversified Development Patterns Less Construction Delay Commute & Travel Options Improve System Efficiency 0% Build More Capacity

What s the Aggie Gonna Talk About? Why is transportation important? Importance of a value for money proposition What are the real choices? What are the expectations? Getting the data and using it Evaluating decisions and engaging the public 7

$6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 Pay More in Taxes But Less Overall Wait What s The Question? Wasted Fuel, Time & Maintenance Costs Taxes & Fees 2011 to 2035 Household Cost 6,095 4,825 4,228 3,652 $2,000 $1,000 $0 F-Unacceptable No Change 232 D-Worst Acceptable Preserve Infrastructure 406 511 634 C-Minimum Competitive Median of Peers http://texas2030committee.tamu.edu B-Continue 2010 Conditions Maintain 2010

What does this mean to me? The average Texan pays: $22/month in state/federal gas taxes and auto fees $128/month Internet, phone, cable TV $139/month cell phone

Fewer Consumers, Workers, Jobs Within Marketshed 1 Hour Commute Payroll & turnover increases; More trucks to maintain service standards More distribution centers

Texas Legislature Mandate TxDOT Appropriations Rider: 100 most congested sections (post on website every year) Travel delay per mile - find the biggest & slowest traffic streams What are the projects that will attack congestion for each section? Projects that will get the most bang for the buck Targeted funding (Not the typical creamy peanut butter process) What are economic benefits of projects? http://txdot.gov/inside-txdot/projects.html

Texas 100 Most Congested Methodology Traffic volume GIS dataset (TxDOT) Speed GIS dataset (INRIX) Combine the two Make the sets comparable Calculate congestion statistics by direction and segment Find problems location, time, cause Solution Operation, Design, Policy, Kitchen Sink? 12

Texas 100 Data INRIX Selected Bidder for 2013 Data $125,000 Licensed to TxDOT and all MPOs Unlimited use of derivative data for corridor level Average & percentile speeds by direction 15-Minute Intervals for average week 13

The Data We Would Like To Have Archived 15-minute speeds Traffic volume by 15-minute throughout the year (or estimated) Average passenger vehicle occupancy Roadway inventory data The Whys Weather, Incidents, Events, Road Work, Agency Actions

24-Hour Volume Profiles Example: Weekday Traffic, No to Low Congestion Percent of Daily Volume 12% 10% 8% 6% AM Peak, Frwy Wkday AM Peak, Non- Frwy Wkday PM Peak, Frwy Wkday PM Peak, Non- Frwy Wkday 4% 2% 0% Mid 4:00 8:00 Noon 4:00 8:00 Mid 15

2013 Data Comparison Texas 130,000 directional miles 110,000 directional miles matched to roadway inventory Alabama 30,000 directional miles 26,000 directional miles matched to roadway inventory Speeds by direction, every 15 minutes of average day 16

Where is Congestion in Texas? numerically, only a few places.. Hours Per Mile (1000s) 1,200 Top 20 Cost - $1,590M (43%) 1,000 800 Cost of 21-50 : $1,110M (30%) 600 400 200-1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 Cost of 51-100 : $1,000M (27%)

The Texas Freight Network Cornerstone of Texas Freight Mobility Plan Defines an all-mode Texas Freight Network Transportation corridors Key freight generators and gateways Source: Texas Freight Advisory Committee

Freight Congestion A Key Element of the 21 st Century Economy U.S. urban truck delay 350 million truck hours $27 billion Inventory costs Just-in-time operations Fleet productivity Distribution centers Public & private sector decision structures

graphic

TOol using STAcked DAta (TOSTADA) Decisions aren t just about congestion 1 st Step: Better public engagement Discuss all project effects Use geographic information tools Mapping, graphics, data, stories Yes, we started with the food, then developed the name

Congestion

Pavement Condition

Bridge Condition

Safety

Freight Commodity Value

Use Case US 281 at Loop 1604 Bridge Condition Congestion Freight Value Pavement Condition Crash Risk Bridges good / fair Congestion high Freight Value medium-high Pavement very good / good Crash very high / high Spend resources here? If so, what type & amount? Take resources elsewhere?

TOSTADA The Next Course More data, more collaboration Brings traditional silo data together Helps frame project design and benefit messaging Consistent format for easier at-a-glance understanding Policy-makers can use results to better understand problems http://mobility.tamu.edu/mip/

What s Next? Local Input and MAP 21 Performance Measures MPOs, municipalities, transit agencies Use performance data to find problems and identify broad range of solutions Operations, design, travel options, pricing, policy Dashboards and Reports Facilitates transferability and accountability Engage the public more aggressively Projects, Long-range plans, Funding discussions

Texas A&M Transportation Institute (with TAMU Transportation Services, City of College Station, City of Bryan, BCS Chamber of Commerce, Convention and Visitors Bureau, Downtown Bryan Association, TAMU Athletics, 12 th Man Foundation, TxDOT, Safety and Law Enforcement Agencies)

Kyle Field Gameday: 4 th Largest Downtown in Texas Kyle Field Gameday 120,000+ attendees/workers 2 Freeways Downtown Austin 125,000 workers 4 Freeways Some Perspective Downtown Dallas 145,000 workers 6 Freeways Downtown Houston 150,000 workers 7 Freeways

Real time traffic Real time parking Shuttle bus service maps Parking cost information, pay through app Game weekend in BCS Dining, Activities, Hotels, Tickets App will evolve in 2015 Connected to: Bandwidth? gameday.12thman.com

2014 Kyle Field Transportation Ole Miss: Medical emergency on George Bush West & DWI crash on Stotzer at FM 2818

So now what? Use our existing roads smarter Move crashes and stalls out of the way Time traffic signals so more see green Encourage carpooling Change rush hour nightmares through flex-time, telecommuting, etc.

So now what? Get the biggest bang for the buck Tackle most congested roadways Improve safety Support biking, walking and mass transit options

Mobility Investment Priorities The Take-Aways Agencies must involve their stakeholders Go meet the public where they are Innovative designs and operating ideas are needed Multiple funding sources will be needed Technology can play a role Public-private partnerships - leading construction practice to the future Incentivize the market and encourage creativity mobility.tamu.edu/mip

Slide 37 1982 Extreme Severe 5% 6% Heavy 7% Moderate 9% Expanding Travel Delay & Shrinking Free-Flow Hours Total Delay = 1.1 Billion Hours Uncongested 73% Wasted Fuel (Same Trend) 2.9 B Gallons in 2011 Severe 8% Heavy 9% 2011 Extreme 13% Moderate 18% Total Delay = 5.5 Billion Hours Uncongested 21% Light 31%

What s New: Daily Volume Profiles Time-of-day profile for truck volumes differs from mixed vehicle Data Source: FHWA Office of Policy Information and state DOTs, and TTI analysis

Slide 39 Reliability: The Profession Catches Up to the Public

How is This Information Used in the Public Sector? Monitoring performance What if? Project prioritization, decision-making Special events, what is the effect of X? Related policy/funding decisions

How Can This Information be Useful to Private Industry? Understand time required to traverse the network Understand risk by using variability of travel times Time-of-day travel time to help schedule delivery routes Avoiding bottlenecks to improve efficiency Distribution center location