Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Similar documents
Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP) New Generation in Water Supply Management-Pilot Studies

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Reduce, Reuse, Replenish: Stormwater Re-use in the City of Hugo.. Bryan Bear City of Hugo

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L LCCMR Work Plan

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Rice Creek Watershed District BWSR Watershed-Based Funding Pilot Program Application Form Feasibility Studies

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Goal of the 1972 Clean Water Act

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2017 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Chapter 8: Water Supply & Sanitary Systems

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

WATER SUPPLY NOW AND FOR THE FUTURE Steps toward sustainable water supplies

Sustaining the region s waters, sustaining the region.

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2017 Request for Proposals (RFP)

The Regulatory Framework

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Chapter 8: Water Supply & Sanitary Systems

O R A N G E C I T Y S INTEGRAT E D W AT E R R E S O U R C E S M A N A G E M E N T & R E S I L I E N C Y P L A N

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

CHAPTER 10: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT

Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Unify efforts to address water resources for the Big Sky area and surrounding zone of influence in three co-equal water resources focus areas:

Rockland County s Water Resources -Selected Findings from the USGS Study- Paul M. Heisig, Hydrologist New York USGS Water Science Center Troy, NY

The Little Canada Comprehensive Plan consists of the following sections:

2016 Monitoring Report; Mississippi River Tributaries

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

Vermillion River Headwaters Groundwater Recharge Area Inventory and Protection Plan

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Storm Water Resource Plan Criteria and Metrics Checklist

Reuse of Stormwater for Irrigation of Municipal Ballfields in Centerville, Minnesota

(Must be a county, city, township, watershed district, watershed management organization or joint powers organization.)

CHAPTER 6: UTILITIES. 6.1 Purpose

Overview of Conjunctive Management in California Let s Have a Frank Discussion

PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Project Review Process is described by Chapter 7 of the IRWMP Form Revised

What is a stormwater utility fee?

Local, State and Federal Funding Opportunities

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Capital Facilities Element

CHAPTER 10: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT

Tapping into Available Capacity in Existing Infrastructure to Create Water Supply and Water Quality Solutions. Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Appendix J. Existing Efforts for Identifying Multi-Benefit Projects

A10. Cost and Benefits Summary

Hello my name is Joy Loughry and I am with the groundwater technical unit of the Minnesota department of natural resources. Today I am going to talk

STORM WATER and LID SESSION

CHAPTER 10 NATURAL GROUNDWATER AND AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT

Groundwater Management and Planning in Washington County, MN

Potable Water Supply, Wastewater & Reuse Element

Goals, Objectives, and Policies Infrastructure Element Introduction

FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF APPROACHES TO WATER SUSTAINABILITY IN THE NORTHEAST METRO SUMMARY DECEMBER 2014

Beneficial Use of Wastewater: Capital Grants for Demonstration Projects. Annual Report

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Legislative Water Commission April 23, Jim Stark, Director Straight River, Becker County

CHAPTER 10: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT

Environmental Services

PUBLIC UTILITIES. This portion of the Comprehensive Plan includes a planning-level review of the:

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

Stormwater Friend and Foe in the Ojai Valley Ventura River Watershed U April 29, 2010

SAN MATEO PLAIN GROUNDWATER BASIN ASSESSMENT STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP#2 SEPTEMBER 7, 2016

Policy on Water Conservation and Reuse:

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Capital Improvements

Post-Development Stormwater Runoff Performance Standards

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #6

Custom Solutions for Your Unique Water and Wastewater Challenges

The Evolution of Stormwater and Rainwater Harvesting in Minnesota. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual Updates and Examples

Water Quality Evaluation and Mitigation Alternative Study Town of Dennis, Massachusetts

Minutes of the REGULAR MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA WATER SUPPLY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

WATER SUPPLY POLICIES

What are WSSC s conservation objectives? How is conservation linked to WSSC s environmental protection, resource management, sustainability goals?

Transcription:

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP) Project Title: Integrated Water Management for Hugo, Lino Lakes, Rosemount Category: B. Water Resources ENRTF ID: 087-B Total Project Budget: Proposed Project Time Period for the Funding Requested: Summary: 698,700 3 years, July 2016 to June 2019 Research and develop Integrated Water Management Plans for the Cities of Hugo, Lino Lakes, and Rosemount by evaluating water reuse pilot studies, groundwater modeling, economic implications, and emerging regulations. Name: Jamie Wallerstedt Sponsoring Organization: City of Hugo, Lino Lakes, and Rosemount Address: 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo MN 55038 Telephone Number: (651) 286-8457 Email jwallerstedt@wsbeng.com Web Address http://www.ci.rosemount.mn.us/ ; http://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/ ; http://www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us/ Location Region: Metro County Name: Anoka, Dakota, Washington City / Township: Hugo, Lino Lakes, Rosemount Alternate Text for Visual: The figure graphically demonstrates integrated water management planning research questions in the context of the proposed project on the local, regional, and state-wide levels. The figure also delineates the environmental, economic, and political study questions and inputs to the study; outlines the analysis that will be conducted; details the quantifiable and measurable outputs from the project; and highlights the benefits of Integrated Water Management Plans. Benefits include water quality and quantity improvements, aquifer recharge and protection, sustainable economic growth, positive infrastructure funding, and informed water policy. Funding Priorities Multiple Benefits s Knowledge Base Extent of Impact Innovation Scientific/Tech Basis Urgency Capacity Readiness Leverage TOTAL % Page 1 of 6 07/15/2015 ENRTF ID: 087-B

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) 2016 Main Proposal Project Title: Integrated Water Management for Hugo, Lino Lakes, Rosemount PROJECT TITLE: Integrated Water Management for Hugo, Lino Lakes, Rosemount I. PROJECT STATEMENT The Cities of Lino Lakes, Hugo, and Rosemount propose to collaboratively research the applicability and feasibility of instituting an integrated water management approach. Each city will utilize the research conducted to develop Integrated Water Management Plans that will guide implementation. A pilot study will be developed for each City to evaluate different aspects of integrated water management. Lino Lakes pilot study will evaluate storm water reuse for residential irrigation. Hugo s pilot study will evaluate storm water infiltration systems for aquifer recharge. Rosemount s pilot study will examine the reclamation of wastewater treated effluent for reuse purposes. The three Cities will utilize the analyses and results of the pilot studies, an evaluation of applicable regulations, and a quantification of economic benefits to develop Integrated Water Management Plans. Historically, municipalities have managed the different types of water (i.e. storm water, drinking water, and wastewater) separately, when in fact the sources and sinks for each type are interconnected. With documented decreases in groundwater levels across the metropolitan area, the need for a more holistic, sustainable water planning method at the local level has become urgent. Integrated Water Management is a new water planning method that seeks to create policy and implementation links between all types of water. Integrated Water Management Plans may eventually replace traditional city planning efforts by evaluating all water resources in one document while creating water reuse and reclamation links to address increasing aquifer demands and encourage economic growth. Lino Lakes, Hugo, and Rosemount have a combined population of 60,000 people and have relied on groundwater aquifers for both potable and nonpotable water uses. Each city is located in areas of aquifer decline or sensitive aquifer recharge and, as such, has been individually working to implement various water reuse and conservation programs. The common goal of these initiatives is to reduce the use of groundwater for nonpotable uses while promoting aquifer recharge. The cities have chosen to pursue this funding collaboratively to ensure that the integrated water management methods implemented are sustainable across the region. Not only will water management practices be improved within Hugo, Lino Lakes, and Rosemount, but local government units throughout the State will benefit from the results of the proposed project. Overall, Integrated Water Management Plans have the potential to increase groundwater recharge, reduce runoff, improve water quality, and encourage conservation. Hugo, Lino Lakes, and Rosemount will collaborate with WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) for this project. WSB has provided the Cities with general engineering services for a number of years and has worked closely with each City in the design and monitoring of their existing water infrastructure systems and has the technical expertise required to complete the scope of this project. II. PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND OUTCOMES Budget: 419,300 Activity 1: Develop and Conduct Pilot Studies in Hugo, Lino Lakes, and Rosemount. The Hugo study will estimate and improve the infiltration rate of the current systems. The Lino Lakes study will examine the runoff reduction and contaminant control for residential stormwater irrigation. The Rosemount study will determine the best use of treated wastewater effluent and the potential treatment required for reuse. 1. Use the second half of the summer to refine monitoring and data collecting techniques. 11/2016 2. Monitor each existing system, evaluate infiltration, volume reduction, water quality for each site. 11/2017 2. Use monitoring data to determine the treatment required in Rosemount and the ways in which 1/2018 Lino Lakes and Hugo can improve their systems. 1 Page 2 of 6 07/15/2015 ENRTF ID: 087-B

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) 2016 Main Proposal Project Title: Integrated Water Management for Hugo, Lino Lakes, Rosemount 3. Implement improvements and monitor for a second season. 11/2018 4. Analyze data and determine how improvements should affect local reuse regulations. 2/2019 Activity 2: Model Aquifer Recharge Resulting from Integrated Water Management Budget: 139,800 1. Create Cityspecific groundwater models by refining the Metro 3 groundwater model. 1/2017 2. Quantitatively estimate aquifer recharge due to the irrigation and infiltration pilot studies. 2/2019 Activity 3: Quantify infrastructure benefits of water reuse and the development of Budget: 69,800 a 4 th utility. Evaluate regulatory options. 1. Determine economic benefit by quantifying potable water reduction and infrastructure needs. 12/2016 2. Research and estimate the cost of developing a 4 th utility for water reuse. 2/2017 3. Research current regulations surrounding water reuse. 4/2017 4. Determine regulations that should be considered locally. 6/2017 5. Using results from pilot studies, determine what regulations should be implemented. 3/2019 Activity 4: Develop Integrated Water Management Plans Budget: 69,800 1. From knowledge gained through Activities 14, create policy documents that link results from pilot 3/2019 studies, groundwater modeling, economic research, and regulatory research. 2. Finalize Integrated Water Management Plans. 5/2019 III. PROJECT STRATEGY A. Project Team/Partners City of Hugo: 232,900 City of Lino Lakes: 232,900 City of Rosemount: 232,900 The Cities will utilize their existing City Engineering Services provider, WSB & Associates, to conduct all research, create models and analysis, and develop the Integrated Water Management Plans. B. Project Impact and LongTerm Strategy Implementing three Integrated Water Management Plans in the Metropolitan area will improve water quantity and quality, promote aquifer recharge and protection, allow for sustainable economic growth, and lead to more informed water policy on the local level. The Plans will allow the Cities to provide consistent public communication and regulatory guidance for drinking water, surface water, groundwater, stormwater, and wastewater planning. The Plans developed by the Cities will serve as an example statewide as other municipalities look to manage water resources more cohesively. C. Timeline Requirements It is estimated that the proposed project will require the entire 36 months allotted. Because the funds become available in the summer, the monitoring of current projects will take place in the summers of 2017 and 2018. The Plans will be finalized following the second monitoring season. It is not anticipated that additional funds through the ENRTF will be required. 2 Page 3 of 6 07/15/2015 ENRTF ID: 087-B

2016 Detailed Project Budget Project Title: Integrated Water Management for Hugo, Lino Lakes, Rosemount IV. TOTAL ENRTF REQUEST BUDGET 2 years BUDGET ITEM Professional/Technical/Service Contracts: The cities will utilize their existing City Engineering Services provider, WSB & Associates, Inc (WSB). WSB will conduct all data collection and research and will be responsible for the development of the Integrated Water Management Plans. AMOUNT Project Manager: Integrated Water Management Plan development, research direction, pilot study development, project management. Graduate Engineer: Pilot study develoment and implementation, data analysis, Integrated Water Management Plan development. Water Resources Technician: Data acquisition and analysis Hydrogeologist: Regional groundwater/surface water balance Analytical Laboratory Rosemount and Lino Lakes Pilot Study Soil and Water Samples Equipment/Tools/Supplies: Metering and Data Loggers Pond mapping equipment Sampling equipment Travel: Mileage (~2,000 miles)between data gathering; Cities of Lino Lakes, Hugo, and Rosemount; and WSB. TOTAL ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND REQUEST = V. OTHER FUNDS 150,000 204,000 153,000 150,000 12,500 7,200 15,000 5,000 2,000 698,700 SOURCE OF FUNDS AMOUNT Status Other NonState To Be Applied To Project During Project Period: N/A Other State To Be Applied To Project During Project Period: N/A Inkind Services To Be Applied To Project During Project Period: City of Hugo: City Engineer 18,600 Secured City of Lino Lakes: City Engineer 18,600 Secured City of Rosemount: City Engineer/Public Works Director 18,600 Secured Funding History: Hugo: Money towards developing a stormwater CIP and designing and constructing existing water 1,000,000 Secured reuse and infiltration projects Lino Lakes: Money towards a residential water reuse feasibility study. 15,000 Secured Lino Lakes: Money towards the design and construction of a residential water reuse system. 300,000 Pending Rosemount: Money towards previous water reuse studies. 18,000 Secured Rice Creek Watershed District: Oneka Ridge Golf Course Water Reuse System & Monitoring 113,700 Remaining From Current ENRTF Appropriation: N/A Page 4 of 6 07/15/2015 ENRTF ID: 087-B

INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT FOR HUGO, LINO LAKES, ROSEMOUNT Study Framework INPUTS ANALYSIS OUTPUTS BENEFITS Environmental: How does the aquifer recharge change due to Integrated Water Management? Soil Precipitation Potable water demand Surface water levels Wastewater treatment effluent Stormwater runoff Chloride monitoring Impaired waters Metro groundwater model City-specific groundwater modeling Hugo: Infiltration pilot project Lino Lakes: Residential irrigation pilot study Rosemount: Wastewater treatment effluent for reuse pilot study HUGO LINO RSMT Water quality and quantity improvements Aquifer recharge and protection Economic: What are the economic benefits and drawbacks of Integrated Water Management? Political: What regulations should cities implement to guide sustainable water management? User rates before and after reuse Financing options Capital improvements estimates Local, regional, state, and national regulation review Emerging public health regulations Development of a 4th utility Infrastructure benefits of water reuse Water system savings Regulatory options Design considerations to address public health Development of three Integrated Water Management Plans Lino Lakes Hugo Rosemount Sustainable economic growth Positive infrastructure funding Informed water policy Regional Context Lino Lakes Hugo Rice Creek Watershed St. Paul Minneapolis Rosemount Vermillion River Watershed Page 5 of 6 07/15/2015 ENRTF ID: 087-B LOCAL REGIONAL STATE

Project Manager Qualifications: Jamie Wallerstedt, PE, MS in Civil Engineering, WSB & Associates, Inc. Ms. Wallerstedt has over eleven years of civil and environmental engineering experience. Her expertise encompasses water reuse system design and management, water and wastewater planning, and water quality studies. Ms. Wallerstedt received her B.C.E. and M.S. from the University of Minnesota in Civil Engineering. Ms. Wallerstedt specializes in the management and design of water reuse systems, storm sewer systems, sanitary sewer systems, water distribution systems, water and wastewater treatment systems, and remediation technologies. She has extensive experience using water system modeling software. Ms. Wallerstedt has worked collaboratively with municipalities throughout the State of Minnesota to develop water rate studies, supply plans, comprehensive plans, and infiltration and inflow reduction plans. Through this experience, she has developed a thorough understanding of writing welldeveloped and implementable planning documents. Ms. Wallerstedt has assisted communities in the State of Minnesota with exploring funding alternatives for water programs. As such, she has expertise in economic development and cost considerations for water management. Select Grants Received Clean Water State Revolving Fund Wellhead Sealing Grants Department of Natural Resources Point Source Implementation Grants Appropriations Wellhead Protection Grants Clean Water Act 319(h) Grants Source Water Implementation Grants Board of Water and Soil Resources Grants Organization Information: City of Hugo The City of Hugo is dedicated to the stewardship of its water resources. The City of Hugo has many measures in place to promote the conservation of appropriate reuse of its water resources. The City has completed the Oneka Ridge Golf Course water reuse project in cooperation with the Rice Creek Watershed District. In addition, the City is working to complete three more water reuse projects to use as pilot/case studies. The City will strive to reduce, reuse and replenish our water resources for the purposes of being good stewards of the resource by: conserving water that is pumped from the ground; responsibly managing the City's municipal infrastructure; reducing fees, charges, or water bills for those who conserve water; encouraging the recycling of water where possible; and working with residents and businesses to slow the growth rate of water usage. City of Lino Lakes The water resources in Lino Lakes are one of the things that residents enjoy most about living here whether it s fishing, canoeing, swimming, or just relaxing by the shore. Our water resources also provide valuable habitat to many different birds, mammals and fish while recharging our drinking water supply by slowing runoff and infiltrating it into the ground. Lino Lakes is currently working with residential developers to explore water reuse options within private developments. City of Rosemount The City of Rosemount works hard to provide adequate amounts of clean, safe water to its residents and businesses. Water conservation and water reuse, especially during peak summer usage months, will help ensure that the water system can provide enough water for primary needs such as drinking water and fire suppression. The City is currently in discussions with private developers, the MCES wastewater treatment division, and industrial users to evaluate options for reuse. Page 6 of 6 07/15/2015 ENRTF ID: 087-B