GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW RESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 281 ENTRY YEAR: GIS Compartment Acreage: 1754 County: Crawford

Similar documents
ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 48 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 40 ENTRY YEAR: 2009

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 37 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 55 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 21 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 129 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #172 Entry Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 3032 County: Iron

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 148. ENTRY YEAR: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 1,571 County: CHEBOYGAN

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 4. ENTRY YEAR: 2007 Compartment Acreage: 1,348 County: OTSEGO

CRYSTAL FALLS FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT #73 - ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: County: Dickinson

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 134 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 19 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 1330 County: Marquette

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 51 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 137. ENTRY YEAR: 2008 Compartment Acreage: 3,655 County: Cheboygan

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 137 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 43. ENTRY YEAR: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 3,343 County: CHARLEVOIX

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 85 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 1927 County: Schoolcraft

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 155 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 202 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 40 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acres 2327 County: Menominee

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 9 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #50 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 18 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 211 Entry Year: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 584 County: Marquette

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #187 County Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 600 County: Iron

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 194 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 19 ENTRY YEAR: 2013

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 19 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 014 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 194 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #61 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 277 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 020 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 122 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 135 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 008 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW RESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 201 ENTRY YEAR: GIS Compartment Acreage: 1912 County: Crawford

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 152 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 186 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 58 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Compartment Review Presentation

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 146 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 247 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 60 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 18 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 223 ENTRY YEAR: GIS Compartment Acreage: 1472 County: Crawford

Gwinn FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT #227 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1564 County: Marquette

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT # 9 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1775 GIS acres County: Marquette

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 63 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 120 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

Compartment Review Presentation

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 49 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Watershed and Fisheries Considerations: Lyons lake to the NE with no real access and Whiskey Creek which runs through the compartment.

Today, jack pine dominates the western ½ of the compartment while aspen is somewhat more prevalent in the eastern ½.

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 153. ENTRY YEAR: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1,387 County: Cheboygan

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #76 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1212 County: Dickinson

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 157 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 147 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 17 ENTRY YEAR: GIS Compartment Acreage: 1,843 County: Oscoda

Compartment Review Presentation

COMPARTMENT PRESENTATION

Compartment Review Presentation

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 175 ENTRY YEAR: GIS Compartment Acreage: 3,200 County: Crawford

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #22 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #33 ENTRY YEAR: 2002

Baraga Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #11 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 3353 County: Baraga

Draft Revision Date: April 28, 2008, Aug. 2008, 10/20/08

BARAGA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #28 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Compartment Review Presentation

Cadillac Forest Management Unit COMPARTMENT REVIEW

Sault Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment # 49 Entry Year: 2013 Compartment Acreage: 1,929 County: Chippewa

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #17 ENTRY YEAR: 2001

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #101 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1248 County: Dickinson

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 104 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1,291 County: Alger

Compartment Review Presentation

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 116 ENTRY YEAR: 2012

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 113 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 2772

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #193 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1258 County: Iron

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT # 57 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1686 County: Menominee

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 60 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Sault Ste Marie Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment # 54 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1,210 County: Chippewa

COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 107 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage (GIS Acres): 1593 County: Missaukee

Compartment Review Presentation

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 190. ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 2,401 County: Cheboygan

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 170 ENTRY YEAR: GIS Compartment Acreage: 1,255 County: Crawford

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 51 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Compartment Review Presentation

Newberry Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #42070 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 2,860 County: Chippewa

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 246 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Revision Date: 6/20/2011. Stand Examiner: Linda Lindberg. Legal Description: T45N, R31W, Sections 27, 28, 32 and 34. RMU (if applicable):

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Transcription:

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW RESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 281 ENTRY YEAR: 2008 GIS Compartment Acreage: 1754 County: Crawford Revision Date: October 9, 200 Stand Examiner: Joan Charlebois Legal Description: T2N R1W Sections 4, 9 and T27N R1W Sections 2, Management Goals: The emphasis of management shall be on retaining and enhancing the natural beauty, health, sustainability and biological diversity of the area. While not intended as a road map, Conner's Marsh Flooding Master Plan concepts will be incorporated, where appropriate, along with the compartment-wide goals of enhancing wildlife habitat and providing for hunting and wildlife viewing opportunities. The underlying theme of all management activities will continue to be the maintenance of forest health, productivity, sustainability and species and structural diversity, while providing for visual management and multiple uses. Soils and Topography: The terrain is gently rolling to rolling, on primarily Grayling and Graycalm sands, with various organic soil types adjacent to the flooding. Ownership Patterns, Development, and Land Use in and Around the Compartment: The compartment is comprised of solid State ownership in Sections 2 and, with the recent acquisition of a land-locked private parcel in the N1/2SE of Section 2. Sections 4 and 9 have private property interface adjacent to the Au Sable River, with several cabins being accessed across State land. Unique, Natural Features (include only non-site specific and non-sensitive information): Secretive Locust has been found within the compartment. Eagle and Osprey have been reported in the Conner s Marsh Flooding area. There is the potential for occurrences of Kirtland's warbler and prairie warbler in young jack pine; massasauga rattlesnake, Blanding's turtle, and wood turtle along the Au Sable River; great blue heron rookeries associated with the flooding; red-shouldered hawk and goshawk; dry prairie plants and dusted skipper, grizzled skipper and red-legged spittlebug in grassy openings and open jack pine stands. Archeological, Historical, and Cultural Features (include only non-site specific and non-sensitive information): None known. Special Management Designations or Considerations: Section and the northeast quarter of Section 4 lie within the Conner's Marsh Flooding project area boundary, where the primary management goal is... the restoration and management of wild birds and mammals and provision for the public use of those wildlife resources (see the 200 draft Master Plan ). Sections & 4 have also been identified as historical deeryard areas. Watershed and Fisheries Considerations: The Conner s Marsh Flooding - maintained by a water control structure in Compartment 28 - is drained by a small stream into the main branch of the Au Sable, a designated Natural River. The compartment fronts two segments of the Au Sable River.

Wildlife Habitat Considerations: Conner s Marsh Flooding Master Plan concepts include considering: longer rotations for coniferous forest types that border the impoundment, snag retention or creation, clearcutting aspen, oak and jack pine to maintain a mix of forest types, applying prescribed fire to simulate historic occurrences, and maintaining the current level of public access while discouraging new trail roads (see the 200 draft Master Plan). Waterfowl, Eagles, Osprey and various fur-bearing mammals use the marsh and associated beaver ponds. Snowshoe hare specifications should be applied in aspen stands that are scheduled for harvest. Winter deer cuts, initiated through Forest Treatment Proposals, can be made in and along the swamp conifer types that constitute major deer yards. Sections & 4 have been identified as historical deeryard areas. Mineral Resource and Development Concerns and/or Restrictions: Surface sediments consist of glacial outwash sand and gravel and postglacial alluvium. The glacial drift thickness varies between 200 and 400 feet. Beneath the glacial drift are the Coldwater Shale and Marshall Sandstone. The Marshall was previously used as a building stone. A gravel pit is located one mile to the southeast and there should be potential. Part of the Compartment is leased for oil and gas and is partly in the Conner s Marsh Field. The field has produced over 20 Bcf gas from the Ordovician Prairie du Chien. Vehicle Access: County roads include Conners Flat Road and Dyer Truck Trail. A road that is signed Gorski Trail is not part of the county road system and a private landowner to the north of the compartment has claimed that it is a private road. Survey corners found indicate that the road is almost entirely on state land, with the exclusion of a narrow strip of the road s north edge near the Martindale Road intersection. Access is good within the compartment on forest trail roads. Trail roads south of Conners Flat Road represent the sole means of access for several private parcels along the Au Sable River. Survey Needs: None. Recreational Facilities and Opportunities: Dispersed recreation, in the form of hunting, fishing, wildlife viewing and canoeing, is concentrated in and around the Conners Marsh Flooding and the Au Sable River. The Conners Flat Canoe Access is maintained by Parks and Recreation Division in Section 9. Fire Protection: The compartment s jack pine stands are small to moderate-sized, with good access to the largest blocks. The adjacent compartment to the north does contain a Kirtland s Warbler management zone. Section 2 s poorer-quality oak stands have a considerable amount of downed wood that adds to the fuel loading and could hinder equipment operation. The Conners Flat Canoe Access is the only practical water source within the compartment. For Sections 2 &, the closest water source would be the culvert on Dyer Truck Trail a mile to the west. LOTS Compartment Acreage: 1774 The following 5 reports from the Operations Inventory System (OIPC) are attached: Cover Type by Age Class Cover Type by Management Objective Compartment Volume Summary Proposed Treatments No Limiting Factors Proposed Treatments With Limiting Factors The following information is displayed, where pertinent, on the attached compartment maps: Base feature information, stand numbers, cover types Proposed treatments Proposed road access system Suggested potential old growth

10/2/200 11:7: AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE : Page 1 of 1 AUSABLE STATE FOREST GRAYLING FOREST MGT UNIT CRAWFORD COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 281 Table (acres shown in boxes) STAND AGE CLASS COVER TYPE Not Coded 0-9 10-19 20-29 0-9 40-49 50-59 0-9 70-79 80-89 90-99 100-109 110-119 120-129 10-19 140-149 150-159 All Aged Total Aspen 20 180 7 10 247 Black Spruce 19 10 29 Bog or Marsh 12 12 Cedar 14 8 52 Grass 20 20 Jack Pine 57 4 47 170 8 Lowlnd Brush Marsh 10 10 Mx Swmp Cnfr 58 58 Non Stocked Oak 10 2 174 14 44 Red Pine 24 22 75 121 Swamp Hrdwds Tamarack Treed Bog 8 8 Upland Brush 21 2 4 27 7 Upland Hdwds 7 Water 150 150 White Pine 12 1 4 Total 80 81 9 211 44 89 1 1 2 177 14 14 8 1754

10/2/200 11:7:5 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE A: Page 1 of 1 AUSABLE STATE FOREST GRAYLING FOREST MGT UNIT CRAWFORD COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 281 Table A (acres shown in boxes) MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE TYPE COVER TYPE A S V C G H J I L P N Q X O B R K Y F E T D U M Z W Total A Aspen 247 247 S Black Spruce 29 29 V Bog or Marsh 12 12 C Cedar 52 52 G Grass 20 20 J L N Q X O R E T D U M Z Jack Pine 8 8 Lowlnd Brush Marsh 10 10 Mx Swmp Cnfr 58 58 Non Stocked Oak 44 44 Red Pine 121 121 Swamp Hrdwds Tamarack Treed Bog 8 8 Upland Brush 27 27 Upland Hdwds 7 7 Water 150 150 W White Pine 4 4 Total 247 29 12 52 20 8 10 58 44 121 8 27 7 150 4 1754

10/2/200 11:7:9 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 10: Page 1 of 1 AUSABLE STATE FOREST GRAYLING FOREST MGT UNIT CRAWFORD COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 281 Table 10 - COMPARTMENT VOLUME SUMMARY - ALL STANDS COMPARTMENT SUMMARY TOTAL VOLUME Hardwood 1744 Cds Hardwood 118 Mbf Softwood 4019 Cds Softwood 121 Mbf Sum TotVol 1171 Cds CUT VOLUME Hardwood 29 Cds Hardwood 909 Mbf Softwood 52 Cds Softwood 255 Mbf Sum CutVol 2949 Cds Total Cmpt Acres Acres Proposed For Cut... 7 1754

Stand GRAYLING FOREST MGT UNIT Proposed Treatments Compartment: 281 With NO Limiting Factors Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need Entry Year: 2008 FDF Status 5 55 81 58 oak mature final harvest 1 "Thinned" in 1999 under sale #012-98-01, cutting only aspen, RM & JP. Aside from fairly hybridized oak along the N edge, the stand on the high ground is fair-to-good quality RO small diam saw with good height growth & the best vigor of any oak stand in the compt. The "thinning" resulted in thick A & Mr2 regen below. While the RO is holding up well, it's growing extremely slow now, & with the A there is no hope for seed-origin regen. Final harvest now to get stump-sprout regen before the oak starts to lose vigor. Harvest will mean damage to existing BTA regen, but this is a unique oak stand for this area in terms of quality and efforts should be made to maintain an oak component, although a large RM & BTA component is expected to perpetuate the stand's mixed species composition. Harvest when the oak is dormant to reserve stores for stump sprouting. 8 24 8 50 oak high risk improvement 1 NPO & overmature JP rapidly breaking up with a lot of snags & downed wood. Short RP saw, occasional BTA, small RM. A lot of firewood cutting, some illegal. Informal but heavily-used campsite to SW. Salvage the NPO, JP and BTA. Leave all RP. Harvest when the oak is dormant and leave scattered tops. Used previous SI since new SI on declining oak was very low and probably not representative. 10 4 8 57 oak high risk improvement 1 Oak stand breaking up. Was fuelwood salvaged in 2002 under sale #27-01-02. More than the contract specs of 2 snags/ac were left due to excessive rot. A lot of overmature JP & NPO on the ground. Scattered RP (super-canopy, small saw, poles, <R1 regen overall), low-density RM stump clump poles and even some saw-sized. Salvage the NPO & JP. Leave all RP. Leave tops and cut when oak is dormant. Averaged SI between this and last YOE's. 1 70 5 oak high risk improvement 1 Declining NPO: most of area was firewood salvaged once already in 200. Oak is not seeding in. RP in all age/size classes nearly as large a component. Overmature JP saw with much mortality. Salvage the NPO & JP. Leave all RP & WP. Cut when oak is dormant and leave tops. Old OI notes indicate "some planted RP" - I did not pick up on that while walking through the stand. 17 R8 29 5 55 red pine two aged improvement 1 Most of stand fuelwood salvaged in 2004/2005. The NPO & overmature JP is rapidly declining, with a lot of snags and downed wood. Mix of age/size classes of RP along with WP small poles and regen. Salvage the NPO, JP & aspen. Leave all RP, WP & WO. Cut when the oak is dormant and leave tops scattered. 21 2 7 50 oak mature seed tree 2 natural regeneration Split from stand 25 by 2001 patch cuts. Declining NPO saw with RP saw & poles seeding in <R1, still open below. Used stand 25's SI. A lot of firewooding. The patch-cut oak stump sprouts were heavily browsed. Stand lies within the Conners Marsh project area boundary, making maintaining an oak component in this mixed stand a priority. Cut the oak now, at the same time as stands 25 & 4, in order to try regenerating through stump sprouts over larger areas to minimize the comfort level deer have with small patch-cut foraging and to try to overwhelm them with browse. Mark-to-leave 10 BA of NPO for seed. Leave all RP for seed trees and harvest only the mature JP. Do not chip tops; leave them scattered to inhibit deer movement and reduce browsing. Cut when the oak is dormant to conserve stores for sprouting. The goal is to regenerate a mix of species, including oak, RP, WP, JP & RM. Given the area's historical deeryard status and the importance of managing for a mixed stand with an oak component, lower stocking levels are acceptable and preferable to artificial regen (planting). 25 2 7 50 oak mature seed tree 2 natural regeneration Original stand split into 21, 25 & 4 by 2001 patch cuts. NPO is mature and declining, but patch cuts were heavily deer browsed & most oak stump sprouts were killed. Stand does have RP saw, poles & saps in clumps with areas of W, J, & RM regen. The coded "R1" understory is a composite of R, J, WP & RM regen. RM stump clump poles scattered around. Cut the oak (except mark-to-leave 10 BA NPO), merchantable JP & aspen. Leave all RP & WP & protect regen. Treat at the same time as stands 21 & 4. Stand lies within the Conners Marsh project area boundary, making maintaining oak in this mixed stand a priority. Cut when the oak is dormant to conserve stores for sprouting. Leave tops scattered. The treatment goal is to regenerate a mixed stand with NPO, RP, JP & RM. Given the area's historical deeryard status and the importance of managing for a mixed stand with an oak component, lower stocking levels are acceptable and preferable to artificial regen (planting). 4 1 7 50 oak mature seed tree 2 natural regeneration Original stand split into 21, 25 & 4 by 2001 patch cuts. NPO is mature and declining, but patch cuts were heavily deer browsed & most oak stump sprouts were killed. Stand does have RP saw, poles & saps in clumps with areas of W, J, & RM regen. The coded "R1" understory is a composite of R, J, WP & RM regen. RM stump clump poles scattered around. Stand lies within the Conners Marsh project area boundary, making maintaining an oak component in this mixed stand a priority. Cut all NPO (except mark 10 BA to leave for seed), JP & aspen. Leave all RP & WP & protect regen. Cut when oak is dormant to conserve stores for sprouting. Leave tops to inhibit deer movement and browsing. Watch low area N of stand where there is a pocket of aspen over tag alder - equipment operation may need to be limited. Treat at the same time as stands 21 & 25. The treatment goal is to regenerate a mixed stand with NPO, RP, JP & RM. Given the area's historical deer yard status and the importance of managing for a mixed stand with an oak component, lower stocking levels are acceptable and preferable to artificial regen (planting). Page 1 of 2 10/2/200

Stand GRAYLING FOREST MGT UNIT Proposed Treatments Compartment: 281 With NO Limiting Factors Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need Entry Year: 2008 FDF Status 49 R9 22 50 2 red pine immature thinning 2 High ground surrounded on three sides by marsh/flooding. Actively breaking up NPO (that is being picked at by firewood cutters) that had RP & a little scotts pine planted under & around it except for E & S peninsulas. There is also older, naturally-recruited RP scattered throughout along with JP. In order to try to maintain an oak component for the long term, harvest the oak now to secure stump sprouts, but mark-to-leave oak in clumps for mast on the east peninsula. Remove the mature JP, scotch pine and aspen, as well as 20 BA of the RP (focussing on reducing competition with the leave oak & stump sprouts). Cut when oak is dormant to conserve stores for sprouting. Leave oak tops to inhibit deer movement and reduce browsing on stump sprouts. While RP predominates in this mixed stand, the overall goal is to maintain the existing mixture of tree species, with particular focus on perpetuating the oak component. 2 0 87 5 oak high risk final harvest 1 planting Most of stand had all 10"+ JP cut in 1970 under sales #-70, 4-70, 49-70 & 54-70. Actively declining, very poor quality NPO on rolling hills to N, flatter to S. JP in overmature saw and younger small poles as large a component, with occasional WP & RP sm saw, sm poles & regen. Along Conners Flat Road: old burn area to SW, BTA to SE. Used previous SI. The oak is dying without having seeded in any regen. Salvage the NPO, merchantable JP & BTA. Leave all WP, RP & WO. Chip tops to facilitate trenching & planting. Cut when the oak is dormant in order to conserve stores for stump sprouting. Plant to JP, avoiding the steep slopes to the N and the areas to the SE along Conners where the BTA will be regenerating. The treatment goal is to maintain an oak component through stump sprouting and to achieve adequate overall stand stocking with a mixture of natural regeneration (oak, WP, RP, JP, BTA) and planted JP. To mitigate the treatment's visual impact, mark oak to leave along Conners Flat Road. 75 18 81 50 oak mature seed tree 1 natural regeneration Part of stand had 10"+ JP cut in 1970 under sale #52-70. Variable species mix, but common theme is NPO saw with some mortality, along with: TA & BTA to N, RP to NE, JP to W, RM to E, WP to E & SE. The oak is not regenerating and the stand is converting to mixed pine. Cut all of the RM, BF & aspen, diameter-limit cut the JP >", and remove the mature RP in order to reduce competition for the oak. Leave the WP & WO and mark-to-leave NPO for a total of 10 BA reserved oak. Apply snowshoe hare specs. Do not allow chipping of the tops: leave them scattered, except keep tops well back from Conners Flat Road. Cut when the oak is dormant to conserve stores for stump sprouting. The treatment goal is to maintain an oak component through stump sprouting and seeding while also regenerating a mixture of species such as RP, WP, BF, RM & JP. Given the area's historical deeryard status and the importance of managing for a mixed stand with an oak component, lower stocking levels are acceptable and preferable to artificial regen (planting). 401 1 grass nonstocked 0 opening maintenance U/G type with sweetfern, scattered oak & pine lg saps. In shallow depression. WLD will do opening maintenance by FTP's. Total Acres... 74 Page 2 of 2 10/2/200

Proposed Treatments With Limiting Factors Compartment: 281 Entry Year: 2008 Stand Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need FDF Status TREATMENT LIMITING FACTORS: Total Acres... 0 Page 1 of 1 10/2/200

Compartment 281 T2N, R01W, Sec. 4, 9 T27N, R01W, Sec. 2, County: Crawford Unit: Grayling YOE: 2008 Acres: 1,754 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Joan Charlebois Map Revised: 10/1/200 Map Phase: Pre-review 2 04 09 Field Map Legend RLS Corners Miris Corners County Gravel Roads County Poor Dirt Roads Poor Dirt Roads Powerlines Water Features Gates Stand Boundary Biodiversity/Old growth area 02 - Opening Maintenance 100 - Final harvest 11 - Final harvest/planting 24 - Seed tree/natural regeneration 400 - Thinning 900 - Improvement Dyer Tru ck Tra il Gor ski Tra il Mar tin dale Road 22 U2 41 1 J 8 900 10 900 7 M 2 5 100 11 J J5 401 02 A 4 R4 12 O4 25 27 400 2 28 54 R1 21 24 5 A 2 24 25 24 5 O1 40 29 2 1 52 A 8 R9 0 7 A 48 A 9 40 4 24 50 Q5 4 S5 42 47 T2 44 4 49 R9 400 45 D4 9 J 1 900 402 14 R 15 J 17 R8 900 20 W2 18 A 55 Z0 5 Q4 57 A2 51 58 O 51 59 O 0 Z0 1 J 19 L Conners Marsh Flooding Con ners Flat Road 8 X0 1 V0 85 800 A 801 C9 Q5 5 4 J5 84 J5 404 7 A2 2 11 8 J5 79 W 7 J4 82 8 Q5 72 S 70 A 75 24 81 A5 78 E4 7 A5 71 C 74 C5 9 77 E4 AuS able Riv er 802 Z0 Conners Flat Canoe Access 80 Z0 1 0.5 0 1 Miles