AJAE appendix for. Does Animal Feeding Operation Pollution Hurt Public Health? A National Longitudinal Study of Health Externalities Identified

Similar documents
Counts and Density of All Jobs in Work Selection Area in All Workers

Counts and Density of All Jobs in Work Selection Area in All Workers

SWOT Analysis of Commodity Flow Datasets

Economic Contributions of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Food Industries in Polk County, Florida

The U.S. is getting new data for a New Economy and it s about time. BUSINESS WEEK. calibrating a new economy. Economic Classification Policy Committee

Zions Bank Ag Presentation. January 2, 2018

Prepared by: Agricultural Marketing Services Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture 90 West Plato Boulevard St.

BUSINESSES CHOOSE TO BE NEAR TRANSIT

BusinessCounts Methodology 2015A Release June 2015

APPLIED GEOGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS

Labor and Business Statistics For Fidalgo Island (Zip code 98221)

Targeted Regional Economic Development. Tom Harris University of Nevada, Reno Department of Economics University Center for Economic Development

Minimum Core Data Set

Consumption on the Woolen System and Worsted Combing: 2002 Issued June 2003 Summary

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

GLADSTONE AND REGION. Economic Profile

ST. ANDREWS AND REGION

City of Hamilton Annual. Employment Survey 2016 AND 2017 TABLES AND CHARTS

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

Global Strategy. Session 1.2: Minimum Set of Core Data Items. Module 1: Sampling in the Context of the Global Minimum Set of Core Data Items

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH

THE NEW WORKER-EMPLOYER CHARACTERISTICS DATABASE 1

VIRDEN AND REGION. Economic Profile

FLIN FLON AND REGION Economic Profile

Economic Contribution of the Agriculture Industry in New Hampshire. Calendar Year Prepared for New Hampshire Department of Agriculture

NEEPAWA AND REGION Economic Profile

Bed and Bath Furnishings: 2004 Issued July 2005 Summary

GIMLI AND REGION. Economic Profile

Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts: 2003 Issued June 2004 Summary

Defining and Serving Rural Communities

Deciding Minimum Set of Core Data at national and global level

GRAND RAPIDS AND REGION Economic Profile

Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts: 2001 Issued July 2002 Summary

Section 4.13 Population and Housing Introduction

MASTER PLAN. Public Workshop Overview Presentation

Overview of Global Strategy Minimum Core Data Set requirements

The United Republic of Tanzania GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT 2017

Agenda. 1:10 Overview of Farmland Preservation Planning Law, Planning Process, & Timeline

Who Earns $15 in St Paul?

AN ECONOMIC DESCRIPTION OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN PERSHING COUNTY

Overview of the Emission Inventory from For Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Industries

MELITA AND REGION Economic Profile

ASIA AND PACIFIC COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS

Employment Ontario Information System (EOIS) Case Management System

Presentation by Rick Engler, Director, New Jersey Work Environment Council (WEC) OSHA Listens, March 4, 2010, Washington, D.C.

Appendix D: Nonresponse Analysis

LEAF RAPIDS AND REGION Economic Profile

Fertilizers and Related Chemicals: 2005 Issued August 2006 Summary

Fertilizers and Related Chemicals: 2006 Issued July 2007 Summary

RUSSIAN LIVESTOCK & POULTRY FARMING SECTOR

BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Appendix E: Nonresponse Analysis for Analysis Cycles 9 Through 12

Ashford Economy Overview. Emsi Q Data Set, Sept 2018

Fatal injuries. Total Goods producing

Limited Commercial Sales, Services Accessory to Multi-Unit Dwelling Use. Second Kitchen Accessory to Single Unit Dwelling

STAAR 4, 7 - Writing - 1, 2, 3 Livestock and Their Products

Minimum Core Data Set

Swale economy overview. Emsi Q Data Set, Sept 2018

Potential Process to Update Manure Generation Data for Phase 6 Model. April 19 th, 2018

Source: ONS - PROV - Sic07 Industry (2) SIC2007 Table 4.7a Annual pay - Gross 2013

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

HARDIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PRODUCTIVITY GUIDELINES

Peter D. Mitchell 1 and Raymond J.G.M. Florax 1,2

MINNESOTA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIST

Northeast Farms to Food

Mapping and identification of the regional potential of the Republic of Moldova

Economic Analysis of Animal Agriculture

Private Sector Employment, New Jersey

foreworde.book Page 499 Tuesday, February 3, :28 PM Concordances

ECONOMIC. Impact of Arkansas Agriculture

Basildon Economy Overview. Emsi Q Data Set, Sept 2018

BENCHMARKING REPORT OTTAWA-GATINEAU

Washington County Cooperative Extension February, 2011 by: and Economic Development. and Environmental Sciences The University of Georgia

A Comparison of Contributions to the Canadian Economy of Key Bulk Commodity Shippers and Rail Freight Carriers

THOMPSON AND REGION Economic Profile

Economic Contribution of Agriculture to Polk County s Economy

Number of Households, ACS Five-Year Estimate Population Density (People / Square Mile), 2010b

Carpet and Rugs: 2001 Issued September 2002

BENCHMARKING REPORT - MONTRÉAL

Keeping Pace with Employers

Botetourt County Agriculture Strategic Plan. November 24, 2015

Consumption Matrices and the Economy. In the early 1970's Wassily Leontief was doing research on how changes in one

Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Career Cluster Agricultural Animal Production and Management

For more information about this regional profile, please contact: Stephen Lynch, Jobs for the Future,

Section 4.13 Population and Housing Introduction Environmental Setting. Regional and Local Population Trends

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Total fatal injuries (number) Total. Total Private industry Goods producing

Agricultural Production Survey Frames: Changes over time, issues, and challenges

City of Barrie "Open for Business" Survey

Institute for Research on Innovation & Science (IRIS)

BENCHMARKING REPORT QUÉBEC

Israel. Agriculture. Account

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BOISE CITY WIND TURBINE MANUFACTURING FACILITY AND WIND FARM PROJECT

BENCHMARKING REPORT WATERLOO

Sector Load Growth Demonstration Technical Memorandum

TOWN OF CALEDONIA Comprehensive Plan Trempealeau County, Wisconsin July 2018 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT

BENCHMARKING REPORT SASKATOON

North Georgia Local Food & Local Farms. Helping to grow North Georgia s local food economy

BENCHMARKING REPORT - HALIFAX

Transcription:

AJAE appendix for Does Animal Feeding Operation Pollution Hurt Public Health? A National Longitudinal Study of Health Externalities Identified by Geographic Shifts in Livestock Production Stacy Sneeringer Note: The material contained herein is supplementary to the article named in the title and published in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics (AJAE)

Appendix A1: Description of Data Sources Information on livestock numbers comes from a proprietary dataset created by Robert Kellogg at the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). Livestock in this study include beef, dairy, swine, and poultry. Sheep, goats, horses, and other animal types are excluded. Dr. Kellogg created this dataset using the 1982, 1987, 1992, and 1997 Censuses of Agriculture. Public-use data by county from the Census of Agriculture is censored when it is possible to discern specific farms within the county. As livestock operations have become increasingly concentrated, the observations by county have been increasingly censored. In this situation, censoring means that the data is denoted as censored and blacked out. The observation is not omitted from the sample. When data cells can be used to identify individual operations, these cells are marked with a D. Unfortunately, there is no described top-code over which data cells are censored, making extrapolation complicated at best. The data from Dr. Kellogg does not suffer from this impediment. A full description of this appears in Kellogg, Lander, Moffitt, and Gollehon (2000). In order to provide more anonymity for individual farms, the data I have received has units of observation that sometimes contain more than one county. Because they arise from birth records, the natality data also include demographic and medical use variables. I use the 1980, 1990, and 2000 U.S. Censuses to account for the percentage of a county that is Hispanic and the percentage of counties with various education levels. Hispanic origin is recorded on natality records for 99 percent of all cases starting in 1990, and in all states starting in 1993. Maternal education is recorded on the birth record for all states only beginning in 1992. Between 1980 and 1991, four highly-populated states (Texas, California, Washington, and New York) had intermittent or incomplete coverage of this variable. Because of the lack of information in the first two periods, I do not use this information from the birth record. Results using the sample for which I have data on these covariates are remarkably similar to those shown in the paper. I use U.S. Census and Bureau of Economic Activity data to control for per capita income and farm employment by county. Variables for population density, well water usage, and septic tank usage variables come from the Census of Housing. Building permit information comes from USA Counties, a publication of the U.S. Census Bureau. Hydro-geologic factors and land use practices may mitigate any correlations between livestock farming, health, and pollution. The National Resource Inventory (NRI), created by the NRCS, provides a statistically representative sample of soils and groundcover in the U.S. The inventory is performed every five years, corresponding to the years of the Census of Agriculture. A complete description of this dataset can be found in NRCS (2001). I use monthly precipitation and temperature data from the National Climactic Data Center. CWA permit information was obtained via the EPA s online Envirofacts Data Warehouse. Data on physicians and hospitals per capita arise from various releases of the Area Resource File.

Data on the number of establishments in 15 different industries come from County Business Pattern (CBP) data. The 15 industries are the following: accommodation and food services; administrative support and waste management and remediation services; agricultural, forestry, fishing, and hunting support; arts, entertainment, and recreation; finance and insurance; information; construction; health care and social assistance; management of companies and enterprises; manufacturing; utilities; wholesale trade; professional, scientific, and technical services; retail trade; transportation and warehousing. CBP data changes from SIC to NAICS industry codes in 1987. Therefore, constructing a coherent series for 1985 to 2005 requires converting pre-1987 data from SICs to NAICs. This was done using the Census Bureau s SIC to NAIC correspondence tables. In the cases where individual SIC categories are not entirely assigned to a single NAICS, this correspondence table provides the percentage of the SIC that was assigned to individual NAICS codes. Table A1 provides additional information on data sources, years covered, and modifications to the data to make comparable county-period units.

Table A1 Summary of data sources, years available, and method of making compatible Variable Source Years Modification Livestock numbers Proprietary dataset 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997 No modification created by Robert Kellogg at the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) from the Census of Agriculture Infant mortality, Mean Restricted-use birth and Annual 1980-1999 Means taken for periods age of mother, mean number of prenatal visits, percent of births occurring in hospitals, percentage of mothers who are African- American, percentage of mothers that are foreignborn, month of birth, percentage of mothers who are married death data from National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Per capita hospital beds, Area Resource File Annual 1980-1999 Means taken for periods per capita physicians Percent Hispanic, mean education levels Per capita income, farm employment Population density, percent of houses using well water, percent of houses using septic tanks Building permits Percent of land Temperature, precipitation Clean Water Act permit Number of establishments in 15 other industries U.S. Census 1980, 1990, 2000 Linear extrapolation by county between Censuses, then means taken for Periods Bureau of Economic Annual 1980-1999 Means taken for periods Analysis Census of Housing 1980, 1990, 2000 Linear extrapolation by county between Censuses, then means taken for Periods USA Counties, a publication of the U.S. Census Bureau National Resource Inventory National Climactic Data Center EPA s online Envirofacts Data Warehouse County Business Patterns Periods: 1980-1984, 1985-1989, 1990-1994, 1995-1999 Annual 1980-1999 Means taken for periods 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997 No modification Annual 1980-1999 Annual 1980-1999 Annual 1980-1999 Means taken for periods Means taken for periods Means taken for periods

Appendix A2: Supporting Figures and Regression Results 7000 Figure A1: Number of Livestock Farms, by Animal Type, 1930-1997 6000 Number of farms (thousands) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Poultry Hogs Cattle 0 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1978 1982 1987 1992 1997 500 Figure A2: Number of Livestock in Inventory, by Animal Type, 1930-1997 450 Number of animals (millions) 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 Poultry Cattle 50 0 Hogs 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1978 1982 1987 1992 1997

Table A2.1: Fixed Effect Regressions of Animal Units and IMR on Other Industries Independent Variable Dependent Variable Number of animal units (100,000) IMR Accommodation and food services -0.375-3.839 (0.139)* (2.051) Administrative support and waste management and remediation services -0.427-2.023-0.22 (3.140) Agricultural, forestry, fishing, and hunting support 0.267-1.072 (0.325) (4.300) Arts, entertainment, and recreation -0.088-6.218 (0.377) (4.100) Finance and insurance -0.090 0.050 Information Construction (0.063) (1.006) -0.107-0.545 (0.406) (4.676) -0.027-0.113 (0.038) (0.605) Health care and social assistance 0.267 0.796 (0.099)* (1.848) Management of companies and enterprises 0.253-1.228 (0.159) (3.678) Manufacturing -0.058-1.106 Utilities (0.043) (0.465)* -1.093-23.142 (0.944) (16.864) Wholesale trade -0.121 3.691 (0.085) (1.412)* Professional, scientific, and technical services 0.090 1.664 (0.067) (0.852) Retail trade 0.160 0.699 (0.060)* (0.867) Transportation and warehousing 0.114-4.903 (0.284) (3.745) Controls for mother and birth? a N Y County-level controls? b Y Y Period, county, and state*time fixed effects? Y Y Notes: Industry variables are thousands of establishments. IMR regression observations weighted by number of births. Robust standard errors shown in parentheses. Standard errors clustered by county. * refers to significance at the 5% level. a Refers to percentage of mothers that are foreign-born, mother's race, mother's marital status, mother's age, mother's age squared, month of birth, percent of births occurring in hospitals, and average number of prenatal care visits. b Refers to controls for log of per capita income, farm employment, county education levels, percentage of county that is Hispanic, population density, percentage of homes with well water, percentage of homes with septic tank, hospital beds per capita, physicians per capita, CWA permits, building permits, percentages of county in cultivated cropland, forest, rural transportation land, and other rural land, prcipitation, and temperature.

Table A2.2 Correlation between Log of Number of Animal Units and Log of Infant Mortality Observations weighted by number of births in the county. Standard errors clustered by county. Dependent Variable Model I Model II Model III Model I Model II Model III Log(IMR) Log(IMR) Log(IMR) Log (Neonatal IMR) Log (Neonatal IMR) Log (Neonatal IMR) Log of animal units 0.207 0.078 0.074 0.233 0.095 0.074 (0.034)* (0.036)* (0.030)* (0.043)* (0.047)* (0.039)* Average # prenatal visits 0.015 0.01 0.009 0.006 (0.009)* (0.009) -0.011 (0.013) Physicians per capita (1000) -0.386-0.384-0.421-0.417 (0.167)* (0.159)* (0.215)* (0.202)* Log of per capita income -0.261-0.244-0.314-0.299 (0.080)* (0.084)* (0.094)* (0.098)* Farm employment (/1000) 0.068 0.05 0.085 0.060 (0.022)* (0.022)* (0.033)* (0.036)* Population density (/1000) -0.297-0.445-0.314-0.526 (0.087)* (0.132)* (0.100)* (0.157)* % of homes with septic tank 0.174 0.144 0.348 0.255-0.172 (0.173) -0.232 (0.234) % of homes with well water -0.826-0.802-1.044-1.013 (0.199)* (0.198)* (0.258)* (0.260)* Demographic controls? a N Y Y N Y Y Controls for month of birth? N Y Y N Y Y Other medical use controls? b N Y Y N Y Y Land use covariates? c N Y Y N Y Y Precipitation and temperature covariates? N Y Y N Y Y CWA permits and building building permits covariates? N Y Y N Y Y Other industry levels? d N N Y N N Y Period fixed effects? Y Y Y Y Y Y County fixed effects? Y Y Y Y Y Y State*time controls? N Y Y N Y Y R2 0.685 0.761 0.770 0.647 0.723 0.734 N 8,882 8,823 8,742 8,514 8,458 8,395 Notes: Observations weighted by number of births in the county. Robust standard errors shown in parentheses. Standard errors clustered by county. * refers to significance at the 5% level. a Refers to controls for county education levels, percentage of county that is Hispanic, percentage of mothers that are foreign -born, mother's race, mother's marital status, mother's age, and mother's age squared. b Refers to hospital beds per capita and percent of births occurring in hospitals. c Refers to percentages of county in cultivated cropland, forest, rural transportation land, and other rural land. d Refers to the number of establishments for 15 different industries; for listing see appendix.

Table A2.3: Sensitivity Analyses: Fixed Effect Regressions of Infant Mortality on Number of Animal Units Dependent variable IMR IMR IMR Neonatal IMR Neonatal IMR Neonatal IMR Panel I: Sensitivity analysis 1 (One-year intervals) 2.232 1.598 2.134 1.732 1.394 1.712 Number of animal units (100,000) (0.614)* (0.750)* (0.731)* (0.443)* (0.587)* (0.590)* Demographic and socio-economic controls? a N Y Y N Y Y Housing controls? b N Y Y N Y Y Land use, precipitation, temperature, and permit covariates? c N Y Y N Y Y Other industry levels? d N N Y N N Y County fixed effects? Y Y Y Y Y Y Period fixed effects? Y Y Y Y Y Y State*period controls? N Y Y N Y Y R-squared 0.581 0.675 0.688 0.569 0.664 0.678 Observations 9,860 9,141 8,881 9,860 9,141 8,881 Panel II: Sensitivity analysis 2 (Three-year intervals) 1.84 1.02 1.52 1.396 0.959 1.244 Number of animal units (100,000) (0.519)* (0.637) (0.625)* (0.408)* (0.481)* (0.493)* Demographic and socio-economic controls? a N Y Y N Y Y Housing controls? b N Y Y N Y Y Land use, precipitation, temperature, and permit covariates? c N Y Y N Y Y Other industry levels? d N N Y N N Y County fixed effects? Y Y Y Y Y Y Period fixed effects? Y Y Y Y Y Y State*period controls? N Y Y N Y Y R-squared 0.618 0.714 0.731 0.601 0.7 0.716 Observations 9,860 9,142 8,970 9,860 9,142 8,970 Notes: Observations weighted by number of births in the county. Robust standard errors shown in parentheses. Standard errors clustered by county. * refers to significance at the 5% level. a Refers to average number of prenatal visits, physicians per capita, hospital beds per capita, percent of births occurring in hospitals, log of per capita income, farm employment, population density, controls for county education levels, percentage of county that is Hispanic, percentage of mothers that are foreign-born, mother's race, mother's marital status, mother's age, mother's age squared, and month of birth. b Refers to percentage of county with well water and percentage with septic tank. c Refers to mean county temperature, mean county precipitation, existence of Clean Water Act permit in county, number of average annual building permits, cultivated cropland, forest, rural transportation land, and other rural land. d Refers to the number of establishments for 15 different industries; for listing see appendix.

Table A2.4 Fixed Effect Regressions of Infant Mortality Rate on Number of Animal Units, by Size of County Dependent variable: Infant Mortality Rate Entire sample Small counties Large counties Number of animal units (100,000) 1.232 2.516 0.698 (0.485)* (1.591) (0.469) Demographic and socio-economic controls? a Y Y Y Housing controls? b Y Y Y Land use, precipitation, temperature, and permit covariates? c Y Y Y Other industry levels? d Y Y Y County fixed effects? Y Y Y Period fixed effects? Y Y Y State*period controls? Y Y Y R-squared 0.759 0.771 0.795 Observations 9,012 4,487 4,525 Notes: A "small county" refers to a county of less than 610 square miles. A "large county" refers to a county of 610 or greater square miles. Observations weighted by number of births. Robust standard errors shown in parentheses. Standard errors clustered by county. * refers to significance at the 5% level. a Refers to average number of prenatal visits, physicians per capit a, hospital beds per capita, percent of births occurring in hospitals, log of per capita income, farm employment, population density, controls for county education levels, percentage of county that is Hispanic, percentage of mother's that are foreign-born, mother's race, mother's marital status, mother's age, mother's age squared, and month of birth. b Refers to percentage of county with well water and percentage with septic tank. c Refers to mean county temperature, mean county precipitation, existence of Clean Water Act permit in county, number of average annual building permits, cultivated cropland, forest, rural transportation land, and other rural land. d Refers to the number of establishments for 15 different industries; for listing see appendix.

Table A2.5 Fixed Effect Regressions of Infant Mortality Rate on Number of Animal Units per Square Mile Dependent variable: Infant Mortality Rate Model (I) (II) (III) Number of animal units per square mile 0.029 0.020 0.019 (0.005)* (0.005)* (0.005)* Demographic and socio-economic controls? a N Y Y Housing controls? b N Y Y Land use, precipitation, temperature, and permit covariates? c N Y Y Other industry controls? d N N Y County fixed effects? Y Y Y Period fixed effects? Y Y Y State*period controls? N Y Y R-squared 0.677 0.752 0.759 Observations 9,208 9,134 9,012 Notes: Observations weighted by number of births. Robust standard errors shown in parentheses. Standard errors clustered by county. * refers to significance at the 5% level. a Refers to average number of prenatal visits, physicians per capita, hospital beds per capita, percent of births occurring in hospitals, log of per capita income, farm employment, population density, controls for county education levels, percentage of county that is Hispanic, percentage of mothers that are foreign-born, mother's race, mother's marital status, mother's age, mother's age squared, and month of birth. b Refers to percentage of county with well water and percentage with septic tank. c Refers to mean county temperature, mean county precipitation, existence of Clean Water Act permit in county, number of average annual building permits, cultivated cropland, forest, rural transportation land, and other rural land. d Refers to the number of establishments for 15 different industries; for listing see appendix.