Southern Cleaners & Laundry Jacksonville, North Carolina. CASE STUDY Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Evaluation and Risk Assessment

Similar documents
MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Kitty Hiortdahl, EI. Date: March 12, 2015

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz. Date: April 8, 2014

March 16, Dear Mr. Chapman:

July 29, Mr. Jay King. Project Manager

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information

Armen Cleaners Indoor Air Quality Investigation. Jon Gulch, OSC U.S. EPA, Region V, ERB

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR TIER 3 AIR QUALITY MONITORING 218-1/2 South Findlay Street, Seattle (Location 10)

FACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion

August 26, Dear Mr. Meyer:

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

Appendix F Risk Calculations: Other BIP Sources

SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004

PM STRAUSS & ASSOCIATES Energy and Environmental Consulting MEMORANDUM

H&H Job No. DS0-10. January 14, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

February 25, Mr. Wayne Loflin, Maintenance Director Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools PO Box 2513 Winston-Salem, NC

Health Consultation. Lakeland Groundwater Contamination Plume. City of Lakeland, Washington County, Minnesota. MPCA Site Response Number SR145

Update - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida

An Empirical Approach to Site Assessment for Vapor Intrusion

Risk Management Plan Ho Cleaners DSCA ID No Matthews, Mecklenburg County H&H Job No. DS0-14J. Table of Contents

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

Health Consultation. South Indian Bend Wash Landfill Area TEMPE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. CERCLIS No. AZD

Wickes Manufacturing TCE Plume Site Mancelona, Michigan

March 2010 Frequently Asked Questions

Hoovering the Hoover District, North Canton, Ohio by Lenny Siegel May, 2017

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

August 14, Dear Mr. Chapman:

Public Meetings: June 21, 2017, 6 to 8 p.m. June 22, 2017, 5 to 7 p.m.

Results of HRC Injection at Dixie Cleaners, Jacksonville Florida

EPA Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Plan to Amend 1991 Cleanup Plan. vapor intrusion, and identifies and provides the rationale for EPA s

COMMUNITY MEETING Trichloroethylene contamination

THE STATUS OF VAPOR INTRUSION ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION IN OREGON

Ensuring Occupational Worker Safety At Vapor Intrusion Sites

Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.

North Railroad Avenue Plume Superfund Site Update September 11, 2018

Integrated Site Assessments and Risk Assessment for a Proposed Real Estate Transaction at a PCE-impacted Drycleaner Site

FINAL. Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels and Removal Action Levels 700 South 1600 East Street PCE Plume Salt Lake City, Utah

Indoor Air Study Data Summary and Analysis Report Main TCE Plume, OU5 Former Lowry Air Force Base Denver, Colorado

FACTS ABOUT: Former GE Power Systems Apparatus Service Center (Voluntary Cleanup Program) Site Location


Case Study of TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air and the Effects of Ventilation on Entry Routes

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Land Recycling and Waste Management. Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual

Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance

Prepared for: Art Brass Plating, Inc. Project No B-01 January 25, 2010

Combined Use of AERMOD, ArcGIS, and Risk Analyst for Human Health Risk Assessment. Paper No Prepared By:

MPCA Site Assessment: Vapor Intrusion Investigation. Remediation Division Superfund Unit 1

Part 3 Fundamentals. Most Common VI Bloopers. Handy Unit Conversions:

Soil Vapor Migration Through Subsurface Utilities

Vapor Intrusion Basics

Eric M. Nichols, PE Amy Goldberg Day

New Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration

6.3.2 Exposure Assessment

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCB Camp Lejeune) Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) Meeting Minutes

Health Consultation. Public Health Implications and Interpretation of Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) Exposure in Indoor Air

Characterizing TCE Exposure Distribution for Occupants of Houses with Basements

Expediting VI Assessments & Remedies with High Res Data

DoD Environmental Monitoring & Data Quality Workshop

EPA Vapor Intrusion Update

Practical Aspects of VI Assessment for TCE. Acknowledgments and special thanks to:

Evaluation of VI Data Relative to Separation Distance Screening Criteria A Michigan Case Study

February 8, Mr. Jeff Vanderdasson, P.E. PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97222

In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project

Removal of Perchloroethylene within a Silt Confining Layer Using Hydrogen Release Compound

Remedial Methods for Mitigating Vapour Intrusion to High Density Urban Developments

Alternative Sampling Methods Implemented at North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent Act (DSCA) Program Sites: A Compilation of Noteworthy Data

SUNCOR. Four Seasons Cleaners. B s Cleaners

Mark Kelley Battelle Environmental Technology and Restoration

PROPOSED PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION. 560 Terminal Avenue New Castle, DE

Risk Management Plan Plaza Cleaners DSCA ID No Charlotte, Mecklenburg County H&H Job No. DS0-42J. Table of Contents

Calculation of Site Specific Groundwater to Indoor Air Volatilization Factors (GIVFs)

UPDATE TO THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (NJDEP) VAPOR INTRUSION SCREENING LEVELS (March 2013)

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

Comments to Proposed Regulatory Reforms 310 CMR , The Massachusetts Contingency Plan

Fort George G. Meade. Restoration Advisory Board Meeting March 25, 2010

Redfield Site. Environmental Fact Sheet September 2006

National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus

Use of Insitu Thermal

Temperature and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Former NCBC Davisville Site 16 Former Creosote Dip Tank and Fire Training Area

Understanding VI Screening Levels

Table 1 Summary of Preliminary Cleanup Levels West of 4th Site Seattle, Washington Farallon PN:

If you have questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Genna Olson at (919)

Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How.

Fairchild Air Force Base Atlas E Missile Site Sprague, Lincoln County, Washington

Risk-Based Cleanup Actions for Closure of a Brownfield Site

Camdenton, Missouri Site Visit By Lenny Siegel October, 2016

Former Waste Oil Pit Feasibility Study Former Lordstown Ordnance Depot, Lordstown, Ohio

BACKGROUND CONCENTATIONS OF SELECTED CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IN RESIDENTIAL INDOOR AIR

Brownfields Site Evaluation Criteria

Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron (EZVI): A Combination Technology for ISCR Source Zone Remediation

Rapid, Efficient Delineation From VI Potential of A Large Soil Gas Plume Using HAPSITE and Other Lines of Evidence

Trichloroethylene Contamination Decommissioned OMCC site. Dr. Rosana Pellizzari, Medical Officer of Health June 26, 2012

DRAFT BUILDING SURVEY PLAN FOR VAPOR INTRUSION SAMPLING. Former Naval Air Station Moffett Field, California

An RT Regulatory Program Summary

As Toxic As...? Facilitator Instructions

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex

SUBCHAPTER 02S RULES AND CRITERIA FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DRY- CLEANING SOLVENT CLEANUP FUND SECTION.0100 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

INDOOR AIR QUALITY REPORT #7

Transcription:

Southern Cleaners & Laundry Jacksonville, North Carolina CASE STUDY Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Evaluation and Risk Assessment October 2006 Presented By: Delonda Alexander North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent Act (DSCA) Program North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management 401 Oberlin Road Raleigh, North Carolina Tel: (919) 508-8444 Fax: (919) 733-4811 1

Site Location 2

SITE LOCATION New River 3

Site History Dry cleaning operations conducted from 1940 s to 1990 s Site currently used as a commercial laundry facility for uniforms and linens Impacts initially discovered in 1994 during UST removal Varsol, gasoline and fuel oil 4

Aerial View 5

Southern Cleaners 6

Southern Cleaners 7

Southern Cleaners 8

Southern Cleaners 9

Southern Cleaners Storm Drain 10

Storm Drain 11

New River 12

Wantland Spring and New River 13

Wantland Spring Historic Site 14

Wantland Spring 15

Spring Fed? 16

Just Weird Happy Halloween! 17

Investigations, More Investigations. Assessment activities began in April 1994 To date: 32 monitoring wells installed 30 additional soil borings advanced 72 direct push groundwater samples collected 6 borings advanced for membrane interface probe (MIP) logging All properties within 0.5 mile serviced by municipal water and sewer no private wells located 18

Investigations, More Investigations. Air sparging and soil venting system operated at site 1997 to 1999 and 2001 to 2002 Enhanced bioremediation attempted with biweekly sugar solution injections in 1998 Impacts confirmed to: On-site soil On-site and off-site groundwater Wantland Spring To date, more than $500,000 spent on investigation 19

Site Geology Shallow 0-8 Intermediate 8-23 Deep 23 50 20

21

22

23

The Chain of Events The DSCA Program project manager gave a presentation to the County commissioners regarding ongoing assessment activities to keep them informed After the commissioners saw the plume maps started asking questions about potential vapor intrusion issues The wife of one of the commissioners works in the tax office over the plume How will this affect building the new jail? 24

The Chain of Events cont d The County calls an impromptu press conference The DSCA project manager has to answer media questions about the threat of vapor intrusion The DSCA project manager agrees to conduct indoor air sampling as soon as possible 25

Back at the Office.. Staff is scrambling to get background information and to educate public relations personnel County officials demand a hotline number for people to call if they have concerns do we want to do that? Organizing meeting with our state contractor to conduct indoor air testing as soon as possible 26

A Little Back History Community already sensitive to PCE and TCE contamination in early 1980 s it was revealed that a water supply serving families on Camp Lejeune was contaminated with PCE and TCE County trying to expand jail located in contaminated area downtown dispute with city officials Owner of contaminated site was a former city councilman 27

So..Indoor Air Sampling On February 23, 2006, indoor air sampling was conducted in three commercial buildings (Tax Office, USO Building, Probation Office) and one residence (12 Tallman) Samples collected in SIM certified SUMMA canisters 8 hour sampling period Samples analyzed using EPA Method TO-15 (SIM) 28

Indoor Air Sampling Locations Indoor Air and Soil Vapor Sampling Locations Former Southern Cleaners, Jacksonville, North Carolina Indoor Air Sampling Location Soil Vapor Sample Probe USO (9 Tallman Street) SITE USO-2-basement USO-3-crawspace Tax Office (39 Tallman Street) USO-1 12 Tallman Street (Res) #3 #2 #2 #1 #1 #4-upstairs #1 #3- crawlspace #4 SV-2 #2 #1 SV-1 #3- crawlspace Probation Office 14 Tallman Street (Res) 29

USO Building 30

USO Building Sampling 31

12 Tallman Residence 32

12 Tallman Residence Sampling 33

12 Tallman Residence - Crawl Space Sampling 34

Tax Office Sampling 35

Not OK II Sample 36

Sample Results (2/23/06) Location Detected COC 2/23/06 Results Max. (ug/m 3 ) 12 Tallman Residence PCE 4.6 (crawl space) TCE 0.11 USO Building PCE 0.8 TCE 0.12 Cis 1,2-DCE 0.055 Trans 1,2-DCE 0.067 Vinyl chloride 0.068 Tax Office PCE 11.0 TCE 0.63 Cis 1,2-DCE 0.26 Trans 1,2-DCE 0.7 Vinyl chloride 0.082 37

The Toxicologist. Policy decision if measured indoor air concentrations exceed acceptable risk of 1 x 10E-04, occupants will be evacuated or immediate abatement actions will be taken So, the calculations were performed using the Draft EPA OSWER Vapor Intrusion guidance using an acceptable target risk of 1 x 10E-04 and HQ = 1.0 Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic target indoor air concentrations were calculated for each contaminant the more stringent concentration was chosen as the target indoor air concentration 38

Carcinogens C cancer (ug/m 3 ) = [(TCR*AT c )/(EF*ED*URF) C cancer = target indoor air concentration (ug/m 3 ) TCR = target cancer risk (1 x 10-4 ) AT c = averaging time (25,550 days) EF = exposure frequency (250 days/yr) ED = exposure duration (25 years) URF = unit risk factor (ug/m 3 ) -1 Exposure frequency and exposure duration altered for commercial setting instead of EPA s residential setting - exposure frequency: 250 days/yr (not 350 days/yr) - exposure duration: 25 yrs (not 30 yrs) 39

Non-Carcinogens C non-cancer (ug/m 3 ) = (THQ*RfC*1000ug/mg) C non-cancer = target indoor air concentration (ug/m 3 ) TCR = target hazard quotient (1.0) RfC = reference concentration (mg/m 3 ) RfC for PCE derived using EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals reference dose for inhalation (RfDi) converted to RfC using: RfC (mg/m 3 ) = RfD (mg/kg/d)*(1/ir)(m 3 /d) -1 *BW (kg) IR = inhalation rate (20 m 3 /d) BW = body weight (70 kg) 40

Non-Carcinogens Since the constituents detected affect the same target organ, the target indoor air concentration for non-carcinogens was divided by the number of constituents detected to apportion the HQ equally Example: For PCE C non-cancer = 105 ug/m 3 If four constituents detected 105 ug/m 3 / 4 = 26.25 ug/m 3 If three constituents detected 105 ug/m3 / 3 = 35 ug/m3 41

Sample Results and Targets (2/23/06) Location Detected COC 2/23/06 Results Max. (ug/m 3 ) Acceptable Level (ug/m 3 ) 12 Tallman Residence PCE 4.6 35 (crawl space) TCE 0.11 2.2 USO Building PCE 0.8 26.25 TCE 0.12 11.1 Cis 1,2-DCE 0.055 26.25 Trans 1,2-DCE 0.067 52.5 Vinyl chloride 0.068 76 Tax Office PCE 11.0 35 TCE 0.63 11.1 Cis 1,2-DCE 0.26 35 Trans 1,2-DCE 0.7 42 Vinyl chloride 0.082 60.9 42

Couldn t Just Stop There Discussion with the state-lead contractor didn t use all the Summa canisters during the initial sampling event could sample additional residence On March 6, 2006, three indoor air samples collected at 14 Tallman residence 43

14 Tallman Residence 44

14 Tallman Residence Sampling 45

Sampling Results (3/6/06) Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Sample ID / Sample Date / Concentration March 6, 2006 INDOOR AIR 14 Tallman (Res)-1 ug/m 3 0.16 0.30 0.28 0.13 0.49 0.17 14 Tallman (Res)-2 ug/m 3 <0.026 0.29 0.18 0.41 64 0.74 14 Tallman (Res)-3 ug/m 3 <0.030 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 2.8 0.75 46 Sample Location / Description First Floor 14 Tallman St. In dining room. Sample Location / Description First Floor 14 Tallman St. At intersection of master bedroom, main bathroom and kitchen. Sample Location / Description Crawlspace of 14 Tallman St.

Don t need to say more.. 47

14 Tallman Air Duct 48

14 Tallman Residence Florida Heat Pump 49

Geothermal Heat Pump Well 50

14 Tallman Air Ducts 51

Additional Sampling On March 29, 2006, two soil gas vapor samples and six additional indoor air samples collected at 14 Tallman residence Piping from heat pump was was found to lead to outside of air intake unit piping was capped prior to this round of sampling 52

Indoor Air and Soil Vapor Sampling Locations Indoor Air and Soil Vapor Sampling Locations Former Southern Cleaners, Jacksonville, North Carolina Indoor Air Sampling Location Soil Vapor Sample Probe USO (9 Tallman Street) SITE USO-2-basement USO-3-crawspace Tax Office (39 Tallman Street) USO-1 12 Tallman Street (Res) #3 #2 #2 #1 #1 #4-upstairs #1 #3- crawlspace #4 SV-2 #2 #1 SV-1 #3- crawlspace Probation Office 14 Tallman Street (Res) 53

14 Tallman Indoor Air Sampling (3/30/06) 54

14 Tallman Residence Crawl Space 55

Soil Vapor Sampling Point 56

Sampling Results (3/6/06 & 3/29/06) Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Sample ID / Sample Date / Concentration March 6, 2006 March 29, 2006 INDOOR AIR 14 Tallman (Res)-2 14 Tallman (Res)-2 ug/m 3 ug/m 3 <0.026 <0.037 0.29 <0.058 0.18 <0.58 0.41 <0.12 64 <0.16 0.74 2.5 14 Tallman (Res)-3 14 Tallman (Res)-3 ug/m 3 <0.030 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 2.8 0.75 ug/m 3 <0.037 <0.058 <0.58 <0.12 <0.16 1.4 Sample Location / Description First Floor 14 Tallman St. At intersection of master bedroom, main bathroom and kitchen. Sample Location / Description Crawlspace of 14 Tallman St. 57

Sampling Results (3/29/06) Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene 14 Tallman (Res)-4 March 29, 2006 ug/m 3 <0.039 <0.060 <0.60 <0.12 <0.16 3.4 14 Tallman (Res)-5 ug/m 3 0.041 <0.055 <0.55 <0.11 <0.15 2.6 14a Tallman (Res)-1 Compound ug/m 3 vinyl chloride <0.037 1,1-dichloroethene <0.058 trans-1,2-dichloroethene <0.58 cis-1,2-dichloroethene <0.12 trichloroethene <0.16 tetrachloroethene 1.9 Sample Location / Description First Floor 14 Tallman St. In utility room. Utility room door kept closed during sampling period. Sample Location / Description First Floor 14 Tallman St. In hall near Southwest side of house. Sample Location / Description Second Floor 14 Tallman St. In hall outside bedrooms. 58

Soil Gas Results (3/29/06) Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene Compound vinyl chloride 1,1-dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene cis-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene tetrachloroethene March 29, 2006 SV-1 ug/m 3 <11 <17 <17 <17 <23 1000 SV-2 2 ug/m 3 <10 <16 <16 <16 <22 4200 Sample Location / Description Soil gas sample. East side of 14 Tallman St residence; 5 ft deep Sample Location / Description Soil gas sample. West side of 14 Tallman St residence; 5 ft deep 59

What Does It All Mean? None of the indoor air sampling results exceed the calculated acceptable risk level based on a risk of 1 x 10E-04 except one result for TCE Indoor air concentrations at 14 Tallman residence will exceed individual excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 x 10E-06 The soil gas results exceed EPA s OSWER guidance Our policy if it exceeds risk of: 1 x 10E-04 evacuate, take immediate action 1 x 10E-05 monitor or take additional actions 1 x 10E-06 confirm results, take remedial actions 60

Now What? More soil vapor sampling is scheduled with the state-lead contractor Performance of a risk assessment authorized using draft North Carolina risk-based guidance procedures 61

Risk Assessment Process Divided the area of impact into 2 exposure units (EUs) Developed an Exposure Model (EM) for each EU Calculated media-specific representative concentrations for each complete receptor-exposure pathway in each EU Performed a Tier 1 risk assessment Evaluated impacts to New River and vapor intrusion 62

Exposure Units EU Description Area (acres) 1 On-site Area (Southern Cleaners & Laundry) 1.3 2 Off-site Areas (between site and New River) 40 N/A Surface Water Feature (New River) N/A 63

Recent Available Data EU Monitoring Wells Direct Push Borings Soil Borings Soil Vapor Samples Indoor Air Samples 1 9 13 19 N/A N/A 2 18 25 2 3 21 N/A Not available Additionally, two surface water samples have been collected from New River, and two surface water samples have been collected at Wantland Spring. 64

Exposure Model for EU 2 Land Use: Residential (current and future) Media of Concern: Soil vapor Indoor air Groundwater Surface water (New River) Receptors: Current resident (child, adult, age-adjusted), Future construction worker 65

Complete Routes of Exposure (EU 2) Current/Future Resident Outdoor & indoor inhalation of vapor emissions from groundwater. Future Construction Worker Outdoor inhalation of vapors from groundwater, and Dermal contact with groundwater. 66

Representative Concentrations Calculated for each media of concern for each receptorexposure pathway combination Concentrations calculated included (i) maximum detected concentration and (ii) average concentration For soil, data from the most recent (2005) sampling was considered For groundwater, data collected since 2001 was considered For soil vapor, each sample was assessed separately For indoor air, data from each structure was averaged 67

Models and Equations Models required for indirect exposure pathways: Johnson & Ettinger - soil and groundwater to indoor air Jury, Cowherd, Gaussian Dispersion - soil to outdoor air Farmers and Box Model - groundwater to outdoor air 68

Tier 1 Soil Vapor Results Location Sample ID Sampling Date PCE (ug/m 3 ) 14 Tallman SV-1 3/29/06 1000 14 Tallman SV-2 3/29/06 4200 For PCE: Tier 1 Screening Level Indoor Inhalation of Vapors = 31,700 ug/m 3 Tier 1 Screening Level Outdoor Inhalation of Vapors = 1,680,000 ug/m3 69

Example Tier 1 Screening Levels (Resident)* Chemical of Concern Subsurface Soil (mg/kg) Indoor Inhalation of Vapors 70 Outdoor Inhalation of Vapors Groundwater (mg/l) Indoor Inhalation of Vapors Outdoor Inhalation of Vapors Tetrachloroethylene 4.92E-02 2.61E+00 4.44E-02 5.88E+01 Trichloroethylene 4.22E-03 2.24E-01 3.77E-03 4.46E+00 cis-1,2-dichloroethylene 1.16E+01 5.78E+02 3.47E+01 2.55E+04 trans-1,2-dichloroethylene 7.41E+00 3.71E+02 1.59E+01 1.55E+04 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7.12E-01 3.56E+01 1.15E+00 1.51E+03 Vinyl chloride 5.58E-03 2.96E-01 1.42E-02 2.20E+01 For Groundwater: Average PCE concentration at site = 1.2 mg/l Maximum PCE concentration at the site = 15.0 mg/l * Developed based on default inputs

Conclusions of the Tier 1 Risk Assessment All soil vapor concentrations were below the Tier 1 screening level protective of a resident Indoor air concentrations for PCE and TCE exceeded Tier 1 screening levels protective of a resident in all five of the structures that were sampled Concentrations in groundwater discharging into New River are below applicable surface water quality standards. 71

Now What? Planned additional soil vapor sampling put on hold Identify data gaps for Tier 2 site-specific risk assessment Collect data and conduct Tier 2 risk assessment 72

Lessons Learned Always expect the media when dealing with government officials don t get ambushed Don t let the pressure of the moment back you into a corner or cause knee-jerk reactions Just because you have equipment left over don t feel like you have to use it Collect soil geotechnical parameters and any site-specific data you may need for a site-specific risk assessment early on 73

Lessons Learned Would have done more soil gas sampling first before going inside buildings Gather more background data on buildings before sampling Know your acceptable target concentrations before sampling Develop guidance on handling vapor intrusion 74

Questions? 75