chemical leeching into the aquifer per week corresponds to

Similar documents
Name: Problem 1. (30 points; 5 each)

PART A. AQUIFERS & DARCY S LAW - INTRODUCTION

University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Dr. Marek Zreda. HWR431/531 - Hydrogeology Problem set #1 9 September 1998

Green Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Groundwater Using Oxygen Injection in Western Maine

East Maui Watershed Partnership Adapted from Utah State University and University of Wisconsin Ground Water Project Ages 7 th -Adult

Plume Cut-Off Treatment Example

Preliminary Results of Reductive Dechlorination Conducted at the X-749/X-120 Area of the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Piketon, Ohio

Hydraulic containment landfills

ENVIRONET Conceptual Site Model

Tribal LUST Site Case Studies Pine Ridge Reservation, EPA Region Tribal Lands Forum Koos Bay, OR

EES 1001 Lab 9 Groundwater

Livingston County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division. Hydrogeologic Investigation Requirements for Land Division Developments

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

Health Consultation. South Indian Bend Wash Landfill Area TEMPE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. CERCLIS No. AZD

Groundwater. Chapter 10 11/22/2011. I. Importance of groundwater

The Hydrologic Cycle (with emphasis on groundwater)

Storage and Flow of Groundwater

Use of Membrane Interface Probe and Passive Flux Meters for High Resolution Site Characterization and Measurement of Mass Flux/Discharge

LAB 11: GROUNDWATER PROCESSES AND WATER RESOURCES

Brookhaven National Laboratory Overview of Environmental Cleanup and Groundwater Restoration Projects

MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

Two Emerging Concepts About Groundwater Plumes: Matrix Diffusion and Mass Discharge

Christopher Gaule 1, Kenneth J. Goldstein 2,and Curtis A. Heckelman 3. Abstract

Report created: 3/25/2009 1

Plume Area Treatment Example

The total estimated project costs and funding sources are summarized in the table below. Description Total Project Expenditures 20

RULE 4651 SOIL DECONTAMINATION OPERATIONS (Adopted April 16, 1992; Amended December 17, 1992; Amended September 20, 2007)

Introduction to Groundwater. Photo: Joanne Offer/The IRC

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 4.3. Permeability I (Das, Ch. 6)

True False Click and Drag Artesian wells are naturally under pressure and require no additional pumps to get the water out of the ground.

Detail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options

Village of Lockland, Ohio. What s On Tap?

GROUNDWATER MODELING OF A PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER TO ENHANCE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Groundwater Flow Demonstration Model Activities for grades 4-12

FACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion

Math for Water Operators

Introduction to Groundwater

PERCHLORATE REMEDIATION AT A DOD FACILITY. Peter J. Hall P.E. EcoMat, Inc. Hayward, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION

In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project

Sabine River Authority of Texas Summary Report MtBE Contamination in Lake Tawakoni from Gasoline Pipeline Rupture 5. TREATMENT AND REMEDIATION

This document also includes proposed permit requirements, including response actions, when excursions occur.

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

Looking at movement of energy through natural systems

FUTURE IMPLICATIONS OF UTILIZING DEDICATED PUMPS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLING / MONITORING

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

FACTS ABOUT: Kop-Flex. Site Location. Site History. Environmental Investigations

FACTS ABOUT: Former GE Power Systems Apparatus Service Center (Voluntary Cleanup Program) Site Location

Lead Pollution at Outdoor Firing Ranges

Nitrate Tracking in the Lower Yakima Basin

Lab #12: Groundwater (GetWET Field Trip)

Wickes Manufacturing TCE Plume Site Mancelona, Michigan

ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING

General Groundwater Concepts

The Costs of NO Wellhead Protection. -- all cases from Maine

In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone using ZVI-Clay Treatment Technology

Alternative Cleanup Methods for Chlorinated VOCs

July 21, Bernie Zavala, Hydrogeologist LG, LHG EPA-Region 10, Office of Environmental Assessment

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS GROUNDWATER MONITORING. Masanori Ando Musashino University, Japan

How does groundwater get in the earth? Where does it come from?

Methodology for Establishing Cleanup Levels for Contaminated Sites

The Use of Horizontal Sparge Wells for the Remediation of LNAPL Presented by: Bob Lunardini, PE

Name Class Date. In the space provided, write the letter of the term or phrase that best matches the description.

Teacher Resources: Lesson 3: Groundwater. Lesson #3: Groundwater

A Method for Removing Brine Spills in Soil Using Electrokinetics

AQUIFERS AND NON POINT SOURCE POLLUTION

Geologic description of the Pocatello Aquifer

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 2. The effect of remediation on the distribution and mobility of both the LNAPL and water within the zone of interest.

People in Paducah, Kentucky are not

Harford County Health Department Resource Protection Division

TEST PLAN. Constant Head Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements on Repacked Core Samples

Haddon Township Water Department PWSID#: Welcome to the 2017 Water Quality Report

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

FACT FLASH. 5: Groundwater. What is groundwater? How does the ground store water? Fact Flash 5: Groundwater

GW Engineering EXAM I FALL 2010

Hydrologic Cycle. Water Cycle. Groundwater

University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Dr. Marek Zreda

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY - GEOL 406/506

LNAPL Recovery Using Vacuum Enhanced Technology. Theresa Ferguson, R.G. June 2014

Analyzing Groundwater

Water Utility Science Water Math and Hydraulics 050. Name: Date:

Opportunities for Methane Emissions Reductions in Natural Gas Production. Technology Transfer Workshop. April 25, 2006 Villahermosa, Mexico

CHAPTER 13 OUTLINE The Hydrologic Cycle and Groundwater. Hydrologic cycle. Hydrologic cycle cont.

The Transport of MTBE through Groundwater in the Bootheel, an Alluvial Setting

1.85 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERING TAKE-HOME MID-TERM EXAM DUE FRIDAY NOVEMBER 4, 2005 AT 1:00 PM

Understanding The Class II Underground Injection Control Application Process In Colorado To Comply Cost-Effectively

Injection Wells. An injection well is a vertical pipe in the ground into which water, other liquids, or gases are

The Use of A Horizontal Extraction Well In Conjunction with Air Stripping to Intercept A MTBE Plume and Protect a Municipal Water Supply Well

Using the Online Database

Earth Science Lesson Plan Quarter 1, Week 5, Day 1

Fractured Bedrock Pump-and-Treat Conversion to In Situ Bioremediation

Overview Groundwater Contamination Industrial Sites / Ringwood

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

MEMORANDUM. Kathy Yager USEPA OSRTI Dick Goehlert USEPA Region 1 Darryl Luce USEPA Region 1 Mindy Vanderford, GSI Environmental, Inc.

GEOTECHNICAL & SOILS LABORATORY PERMEABILITY TEST : CONSTANT HEAD & FALLING HEAD

Conserving Land and Soil (continued)

Tier 1 Vapor Migration Screening for Property Transactions Using ASTM E

7.0 GROUNDWATER AND STABILIZER TRANSPORT MODELING

INVESTIGATION ON SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FLUID MIGRATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

Groundwater. Groundwater Movement. Groundwater Movement Recharge: the infiltration of water into any subsurface formation.

Transcription:

Mathematics 108 Professor Alan H. Stein March 5, 2008 SOLUTIONS Solutions are given for questions involving calculations. Symbols which have standard meanings when used in class are used without explanation. Other symbols, of course, are defined. 1. Consider the Barkhamsted-New London Landfill, which is on the EPA s National Priorities List. Locate the site on a map and obtain driving directions to it. Briefly describe the site and the reasons it is on the NPL. Describe the remediation steps taken and the current status of the site. Page 1 of 6

Page 2 of 6 2. (Note: This is an artificial problem and the results obtained will not necessarily seem reasonable.) Consider an underground sand aquifer 50 feet thick and 75 feet wide. Suppose the hydraulic head at one point is 110 feet while the hydraulic head 100 feet downstream is 90 feet. (a) Determine the hydraulic gradient. Solution: i = H l = 110 90100 = 0.2. (b) Determine the minimum and maximum possible values for the flux. q = Ki. Since 0.01 K 1000, 0.01 0.2 K 1000 0.2, 0.002 K 200. The flux is between 0.002 and 200 feet per day. For the rest of this question, assume that the flux is the average of the two values you obtained in the first part. The average is 0.002+200 = 100.001, so we will use q = 100.001 feet per day in the 2 rest of the question. (c) Determine the volumetric flow rate. Solution: A = 50 75 = 3, 750, so Q = qa = 100.001 3750 = 375, 003.75 cubic feet per day. (d) Based on the range of possible porosities for gravel, determine the maximum possible interstitial velocity. Solution: Since the porosity is between 0.25 and 0.5, the maximum possible interstitial velocity is obtained taking a porosity of 0.25. Hence, v = q = 100.001 = η 0.25 400.004. Thus the maximum possible interstitial velocity is 400.004 feet per day. For the rest of this question, assume the value you just obtained is the actual interstitial velocity. (e) Approximately how long will it take for water to travel from the place where the hydraulic head is 110 feet to where the head is 90 feet? Solution: t = l = 100 0.2499975. It thus takes approximately 0.2499975 v 400.004 days (about a quarter of a day, or about six hours) to get to the point where the hydraulic head is 90 feet. (f) Suppose it is discovered that approximately 20 pounds of a toxic chemical has been leeching into the aquifer per week. Find the long term average concentration of the chemical, measured in both pounds per cubic foot and parts per million. Solution: Since the volumetric flow rate of 375, 003.75 cubic feet per day translates into 7 375, 003.75 = 2, 625, 026.25 cubic feet per day, so the 20 pounds of the 20 chemical leeching into the aquifer per week corresponds to 7.61897143 2,625,026.25 10 6 pounds per cubic foot. Since a cubic foot of water weights pounds, this corresponds to 7.61897143 10 6 1.22098901 10 7 pounds per pound of water, 0.122098901 pounds in a million pounds of water. The concentration is thus a miniscule 0.122098901 parts per million.

Page 3 of 6 3. Consider an aquifer where the water moves from point A to point B along a path that may be divided into four segments. The hydraulic conductivity is 40 feet per day, the porosity is 0.2, the hydraulic heads go from 100 feet to 95 feet to 90 feet to 85 feet to 80 feet and the segment lengths are 200 feet, 400 feet, 300 feet and 100 feet. (a) Determine how long, measured in days, it takes for water to travel the length of each segment along with the time it takes to travel the entire path. Solution: The following spreadsheet printout shows the calculations. Groundwater Travel Time Conductivity = 40 feet/day Porosity = 0.2 Segment Length h1 h2 i v(ft/day) t(days) 1 200 100 95 0.025 5 40 2 400 95 90 0.0125 2.5 160 3 300 90 85 0.016666667 3.333333333 90 4 100 85 80 0.05 10 10 Total 300 So it takes 300 days for water to travel the entire length. (b) What can you say about the variation in the cross-sectional area of the aquifer? 4. Consider the following one-dimensional diffusion problem. Fifteen (15) grams of a contaminant is released into a liquid which fills a long tube. The diffusion constant is D = 0.14 cm 2 /sec. Calculate the concentration of the contaminant 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 cm from the point of release of the contaminant 1, 5 and 10 seconds after the release of the contaminant. M Solution: We use the one-dimensional diffusion formula C = e x2 4Dt. Using 4πDt M = 15, D = 0.14, we get the following spreadsheet. Each cell has the concentration in grams per centimeter x (distance) \ t (time) 1 5 10 0.25 10.11467524 4.945876114 3.536513112 0.5 7.236704581 4.625524802 3.420063445 1 1.896253733 3.538605392 2.991367171 1.5 0.203464724 2.264387088 2.392924469 2 0.008939616 1.212039067 1.75070094 5. Research the February 12 tractor-trailer accident involving the release of compressed hydrogen gas. Find the time and location of the accident. Describe the weather conditions, including the temperature, and precipitation and wind conditions. Find the amount of hydrogen gas released and the number of homes evacuated. Critique the response of the emergency services.

Page 4 of 6 6. What do you consider the single most important environmental issue today? Briefly describe that issue and justify it as your choice. 7. Define each of the following terms. If a symbol has been associated with a given term, indicate what that symbol is. (a) aquifer (b) aquitard (c) interstitial velocity (d) volumetric flow rate (e) hydraulic gradient (f) flux (g) porosity 8. It has been discovered that one of the storage tanks at a nearby gasoline station has been leaking for the last six months. The community relies on drinking water drawn from wells a half mile from the gasoline station. Discuss measures that may be taken to determine whether residents have been drinking contaminated water and, if so, for how long and at what concentration. Explain how it may be determined whether there is a future risk.

Page 5 of 6 9. Consider a portion of an aquifer where the water flows from an industrial site to a reservoir four thousand feet downstream. (Obviously, not the best situation.) Assume the hydraulic head at the industrial site is 225 feet and the hydraulic head at the reservoir is 185 feet. The aquifer flows through sand with a hydraulic conductivity 50 feet per day and porosity 0.35. The aquifer is 100 feet wide and 20 feet deep. Suppose also that a volatile organic compound (VOC) is leaching from the industrial site at a rate of 2 pounds per day. Calculate each of the following. (a) The flux q. Solution: K = 50 and i = h l flux is thus 0.5 feet per day. = 225 185 400 = 0.01, so q = KI = 50 0.01 = 0.5. The (b) The volumetric flow rate Q. Solution: A = 100 20 = 2000, so Q = KiA = 50 0.01 2000 = 1000. The volumetric flow rate is thus 1000 cubic feet per day. (c) The concentration C of the VOC, expressed in pounds per cubic foot. Solution: Since 2 pounds of the VOC leak into 1000 cubic feet of water each day, C = 2 = 0.002. The concentration is thus 0.002 pounds per cubic foot. 1000 (d) The interstitial flow rate v. Solution: v = q = 0.5 = 10 1.42857. The interstitial velocity is approximately η 0.35 7 1.42857 feet per day. (e) The amount t of time it takes for water to flow from the landfill to the well. Solution: t = l = 4000 = 2800. It takes approximately 2, 800 days for the water v 10/7 to flow from the landfill to the well. 10. Suppose a VOC with the same density of water is dissolved in water and has a concentration of 0.05 pounds per cubic foot. Assuming that a cubic foot of water weighs pounds, express the concentration in parts per million (ppm). Solution: 0.05 pounds per cubic foot per pound of water, which corresponds to 0.05 pounds for every pounds of water or 0.05 pounds per pound of water, which corresponds to 0.05 1, 000, 000 pounds for every million pounds of water. 1, 000, 000 801.282051282, the concentration is 801 parts per million. Since 0.05 11. Consider the formula given for Two-Dimensional Diffusion. Describe each of the variables involved.

Page 6 of 6 12. Assume 10 grams of a pollutant is released into a liquid that fills a long tube and diffuses from the center of the tube. Assuming a diffusion constant D = 0.2cm 2 /sec, find the concentration 0.5 cm from the center after 1 second and after 2 seconds. Solution: Using the one-dimensional diffusion formula C = M e x2 4Dt, 4πDt when t = 1 we get C = 10 4π0.2 1 e 0.52 4 0.2 1 4.61490796754, so the concentration is approximately 4.61490796754 grams per centimeter. 10 and when t = 2 we get C = e 0.52 4 0.2 2 3.81510556522, so the concentration is 4π0.2 2 approximately 3.81510556522 grams per centimeter.