Status and Future of high-power Neutrino Target Stations. Jim Hylen (Fermilab) NuFACT August 2018

Similar documents
NuMI/LBNF Radiation Protection. Jim Hylen NBI September 2017

Systems for Neutrino Facilities. STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

1. Requirements 2. MARS Simulation for Beam Dump 3. Beam Dump Cooling 4. Layout of Beam Dump & Muon Pit 5. Summary & Schedule

ESS Target Facility Design. John Haines for the ESS Target Project Team

Radiation and Enviromental studies for BDF

LBNE 2+ MW TARGET R&D OVERVIEW FOR HB P. Hurh FNAL 9/30/10

COLD NEUTRON SOURCE AT CMRR

J PARC neutrino Cryogenics system

Status Update 18MW ILC Beam Dump Design

Design, Material Selection and Operational Feedback for the New Design of the High Energy Beam Dump in the CERN SPS AccApp 17 Quebec, Canada

Radiation Environment and Shielding Design Optimization at MEIC

Experience with Cryogenic Operations During the Fermilab Collider Program

2008 JINST 3 S The interface to the LHC machine. Chapter Beampipe Layout

Conceptual Design Report

BDF target design and prototyping

Current Status of Research and Development on System Integration Technology for Connection between HTGR and Hydrogen Production System at JAEA

DESIGN OF INNER HOOD OF BELL ANNEALING FURNACE FOR BETTER HEATING EFFICIENCY

Overview of Fabrication Techniques and Lessons Learned With Accelerator Vacuum Windows. Christine Ader IPAC April 2018

Soil, Groundwater and Cooling Water

ST IMPLICATIONS IN THE CNGS PROJECT

Mechanical Collimation System Development for the NLC. Eric Doyle, Josef Frisch, Knut Skarpaas

Lithium Hydride Issues

Overview of the US Department of Energy Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program

Shielding Calculation for the Target Station Design

Application for Permission to Extend the Operating Period and Application for Approval of Construction Plans of Unit 3 at Mihama Nuclear Power Station

NDE Inspections of the NRU Calandria Vessel Part 1: NRU and ET Inspections

A class of its own JUMAG STEAM BOILER COMPACT INFORMATION STEAM BOILER WATER SUPPLY MODULES BLOW DOWN VESSEL COMPACT STEAM SYSTEM.

Maintenance Concept for Modular Blankets in Compact Stellarator Power Plants

EU considerations on Design and Qualification of Plasma Facing Components for ITER

UNIT-5 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. Joining of light nuclei Is not a chain reaction. Cannot be controlled

Interface LINAC ID 25 Risk Assessments ID 26, ID 27, ID 28 Mitigation of Risks

Beam Dump Design for the Rare Isotope Accelerator Fragmentation Line

LOS ALAMOS AQUEOUS TARGET/BLANKET SYSTEM DESIGN FOR THE ACCELERATOR TRANSMUTATION OF WASTE CONCEPT

Detector Solenoid and Iron Structure

Production of High Power and Large-Area Negative Ion Beams for ITER

The Role of Quench-back in the Passive Quench Protection of Uncoupled Solenoids in Series with and without Coil Sub-division

Module 05 WWER/ VVER (Russian designed Pressurized Water Reactors)

D-M-E Hot Runner Services. Total support for your hot runner systems

Geosynchrotron emission from air showers at SLAC. Konstantin Belov UCLA

Steam Generator Ageing Management in Slovakia current practices and related issues

Irradiation Facilities at the Advanced Test Reactor International Topical Meeting on Research Reactor Fuel Management Lyon, France

VVER-440/213 - The reactor core

European Timber Windows & Doors

Historical overview on Vacuum suitable Welding and fatigue resistance in Research Devices

Connecting Coolers to Superconducting Magnets with a Thermal-Siphon Cooling Loop

DEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies

Weholite LIGHTWEIGHT PIPE SYSTEM

MEGAPIE experiment. EURISOL 2nd TOWN MEETING. January 24th and 25th, 2002 ITALY. Th. Kirchner

Lessons learned from ongoing decommissioning project of Fugen NPS

R&D required to place a test module on FNF (how does it compare to ITER TBM?) R&D required for base blanket

AREVA HTR Concept for Near-Term Deployment

1. CERN Accelerator Complex 2. Decay Ring Magnets 3. Costing

THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS

TESLA TEST FACILITY (TTF) CRYOSTAT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Each furnace has an independent 8 segment programmable controller and each has over-temperature protection and RS232 communications.

Wendelstein 7-X A technology step towards DEMO

Reactor Technology --- Materials, Fuel and Safety

HTR Research and Development Program in China

Characterization of laser-material interaction during laser cladding process P.-A. Vetter,* J. Fontaine,* T. Engel," L. Lagrange,& T.

TESLA TEST FACILITY (TTF) CRYOSTAT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Horn studies for the CERN to Fréjus neutrino Super Beam. Nikolas Vassilopoulos (on behalf of EUROnu WP2), IPHC/CNRS

Bypassing Problems related to water cooling Case studyforiltec in EAF. AISTech18, 9 th May 2018

Wir schaffen Wissen heute für morgen

Demonstrative Drop Tests of Transport and Storage Full-Scale Canisters with High Corrosion-resistant

Mondol Fabrics Ltd. Nayapara,kasimpur, Gazipur ( N, E0) 8th March 2014

Neutron applications laboratory for ESS-BILBAO

ISOLDE AND N_TOF CONSOLIDATION

ITER R&D Needs, Challenges, and the Way Forward

Current Status of Pulsed Spallation Neutron Source of J PARC

LOW TEMPERATURE PHOTONIC SINTERING FOR PRINTED ELECTRONICS. Saad Ahmed, PhD Manager-Engineering

ASME B31.3 Process Piping

On-Line Diagnostics Techniques in the Oil, Gas, and Chemical Industry

Radiation Backgrounds for the APEX experiment

The Flexible Taper Transitions for an In-Vacuum Undulator

Graphite Sublimation Tests for the Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Target Development Program. J. R. Haines and C. C. Tsai

Calculation of Water Activity in Point 7

Science of Nuclear Energy and Radiation. Nuclear Reactor Concepts. by Dr. Jerry M. Cuttler, PEng

Brazed Aluminum Heat Exchangers (BAHX) for Optimisation of Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes. Gastech 2017

Shrouding of Thermal Plasma Jets Generated by Gas-Water Torch

OVERVIEW OF THE NSNS TARGET STATION* To be presented at the American Nuclear Society 1997 Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida June 1-5, 1997

TUBE INSPECTION SOLUTIONS TUBE INSPECTION SOLUTIONS. Selection of heat exchanger tube inspection techniques

Idaho National Laboratory s Nuclear Energy Research & Development Mission

Demonstration Test Program for Long term Dry Storage of PWR Spent Fuel

ULTRA-CUT XT SYSTEMS. Our next generation of high precision plasma cutters works THE NEXT GENERATION OF HIGH PRECISION PLASMA CUTTING

NUCLEAR PLANT WITH VK-300 BOILING WATER REACTORS FOR POWER AND DISTRICT HEATING GRIDS

a Cyclotron based European Multipurpose ADS for R&D (MYRRHA)

PRESENT STATUS OF THE HIGH TEMPERATURE ENGINEERING TEST REACTOR (HTTR)

CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMON VULNERABILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY: NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES

ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source

Dismantling of a Heat Exchanger

Laser Fusion Chamber Design

Type FLX Freezer Floor Frost Heave Protection DESIGN GUIDE

Expert Panel on Monju Decommissioning 6 th March 2018

Decommissioning of Dairyland Power s Lacrosse Boiling Water Reactor

Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Application

ULTRA-CUT XT SYSTEMS THE NEXT GENERATION OF HIGH PRECISION PLASMA CUTTING. We Bring Intelligence to the Table. Victor Thermal Dynamics introduces

ULTRA-CUT XT SYSTEMS THE NEXT GENERATION OF HIGH PRECISION PLASMA CUTTING. We Bring Intelligence to the Table. Victor Thermal Dynamics introduces

Clean coating of lithium with parylene-n. Abstract

Properties of Materials

Ageing Management and Development of a Programme for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

Transcription:

Status and Future of high-power Neutrino Target Stations (Fermilab) NuFACT 2018 14 August 2018

Looking at my last talk at NuFACT, 9 years ago, Target Station issues are same: Target & horn stress and radiation damage Tritium release Containment of other radioisotopes Cooling & maintainability Remote Handling We now have significant experience from the NuMI and T2K target stations that can help us in planning the next power upgrades 2

Facilities present and future NuMI (Fermilab) 1 st beam ~2005, designed for 0.4 MW Upgraded in 2013 for 0.7 MW; achieved last couple years Planned upgrade over next couple years to 0.9 ~ 1 MW T2K (J-PARC) 1 st beam ~2010, permanent parts designed for 3 ~ 4 MW Currently 0.5 MW Planned upgrade over next few years to 0.75 MW Has longer term detailed plans for 1.3 MW LBNF (Fermilab) <- at stage where significant design decisions being made Has stage 1 approval, scheduled for 1.2 MW by ~2026 Permanent parts designed for 2.4 MW ESSnSB(European Spallation Source) 5 MW, proposed to be built after ESS is completed 2023 3

How neutrino beam is made & generic Neutrino Target Station components protons T2K Beam dump / absorber for leftovers Target produces p from proton protons Magnetic horns focus/defocus p +/- Drift space p Decays to n Hadron absorber Lots of radiation shielding everywhere Muon absorber LBNF 4

Recent good operation and uptime, T2K and NuMI NUMI has integrated 3.8 x10 21 POT at 120 GeV 2.3 MW-years of proton beam power (real-365 day years of MW) but of course it has taken us over a decade to do that T2K has integrated 3.1 x10 21 POT at 30 GeV 0.5 MW-years of proton beam power NuMI had a string of target water-leaks early on; T2K had an earthquake but In recent years both have had targets and horns last several years each and pretty good uptime in general We are decently up the learning curve. 5

NuMI planned upgrade Proton beam to target station Shorten repetition cycle from 1.33 s to 1.20 s; rest from increased POT/spill 700 kw -> 900 kw in fall 2020? Dependent on funding. Target station upgrades needed for 1 MW 20% wider target for larger beam spot size Upgrade pre-target beam window (this summer) Add another water heat-exchange coil to target pile air cooling circuit Address horn strip-line heating (different Al grade, better air-flow) Increase cooling capacity for horn RAW skids Add to RAW room shielding to prevent loss of beam-on access to power supply room Target station upgrades to address aging infrastructure Design decay pipe window remote repair mechanism Replace target & horn module positioning mechanisms 6

T2K planned upgrade Proton beam to target station: Shorten repetition cycle from 2.48 s to 1.32 s; 750 kw in 2022 Gradually increase POT/spill, shorten cycle to 1.16 s; reach 1.3 MW in 2028 Target station upgrades needed for 750 kw Replace horn power supply for faster repetition rate Increase Tritiated water disposal capacity Further target station upgrades for 1.3 MW Primary beam window cooling capacity Increase cooling of strip-line to horn Increase helium cooling flow to target Improve hydrogen removal from horn cooling circuit Expand capacity of heat exchange systems for horn & helium vessel & beam dump Increase shielding above target pile 7

Will discuss: LBNF design basis outline 1) Target 2) Horns 3) Power & Radiation 4) Target Hall 5) Decay Region 6) Absorber region protons Hadron absorber Muon absorber LBNF 8

Target Radiation Damage Tested at NuMI actually looks OK NuMI graphite target MET-01 took 1.1 x10 21 Protons-On-Target As many POT as planned per year for LBNF at 1.2 MW in 1.2 mm RMS spot size (smaller than planned for LBNF) Autopsy this spring saw no visible graphite deterioration (Target was removed due to gas leak at window) 7.4 mm Spot from left-over protons exiting target width NuMI target 1.2 m long Good lifetime may be due to: Use of small grain isotropic graphite Running at higher temperatures, where radiation damage will anneal 9

LBNF Target RAL design based on proven T2K target ( MET-01 would not fit in horn ) (see Chris Densham talk on JPARC target upgrade) 1.2 MW target Graphite cylinder, helium cooled 16 mm diam. ~ 2 m long Fully inserted into horn Includes upstream bafflette to prevent beam from damaging downstream components 10

First pass Thermal and Stress analyses look good LBNF 1.2 MW target Max. temperature 777.7 K IG43 fatigue endurance limit ~ 18 MPa 11

LBNF optimized horns After several years of optimization studies, last fall LBNF adopted what we call the optimized configuration of target and horns. Three horns, with target fully inserted in the first horn. Rather similar to T2K. Mary Bishai will discuss optimization and the neutrino spectrum in her talk on LBNF Beamline this afternoon. 12

Have completed conceptual design of LBNF optimized horns FEA of Horn A which has highest current density and beam heating Temperature and Stress looks OK Lowest fatigue safety factor at any point is 2.18 Similar to NuMI horn Maximum equivalent stress (MPa) Normal operation Cold start 2 nd pulse Cold start 7 th pulse Stop-n-go Beam heating only joule heating only Before pulse 13.5 5.86 6.71 15.7 13.4 8.72 After pulse 14.6 21.5 22.1 19.0 19.2 5.18 After/mag load 29.7 31.0 34.8 24.9 NA Before/mag load 29.1 27.7 26.3 32.9 NA 28.1 13

Energy & radiation deposition Much of work for design of high power neutrino beam is radiation and rad safety Prompt, air-borne, ground-water, residual, remote handling, radiation damage, Let s start by looking at where the beam power ends up. System Power (kw) Target Pile 1238 Decay Pipe Region 542 For 2.4 MW proton beam power kw deposited in region Hadron Absorber 400 Infrastructure, binding energy, sub-threshold 151 Neutrino power 69 Total 2400 from MARS Monte Carlo for LBNF ~ 10-13 watt deposited in far detector! 14

Radiation challenges (Just a partial list) Destroys almost anything except metals and ceramics Leaves residual radiation so you can t go in to fix things High energy radiation in target station + water H 2 & O 2 explosive gas + water H 2 O 2 (rocket propellant?) + humid air Nitric Acid embrittles steel + air Ozone corrodes + air 41 Ar air borne radioisotope + air (or N2) 11 C air borne radioisotope + anything Tritium very mobile radioisotope 15

Toward more robust target stations NuMI was designed for 6 year experiment; civil was specified for 10 years. (Although it has operated for 13 years, and will probably go half that again) Limited budget & expected lifetime, NuMI was built with 3 long term vulnerabilities: Inaccessible Decay Pipe water cooling ( 5 miles long ) Inaccessible water cooled Absorber (with some redundancy) Inaccessible thin Decay Pipe upstream window (1/16 aluminum) LBNF is being designed for 20 years of experiment & 30 years civil. LBNF addresses above vulnerabilities as follows: Decay Pipe cooling uses inert (nitrogen) gas cooling; no water or oxygen Absorber core is repairable/replaceable; no unreachable water lines Thin Decay Pipe upstream window replaceable with remote handling designed 16

LBNF target hall shield pile & support rooms He Room Controls Room Horn Power Supply Room RAW Room Primary BEAM Baffle Horn A with Target Horn B Cooling Panels N 2 Horn C He N2 Handling Room Replaceable Decay Pipe Upstream window Decay Pipe Nitrogen Cooling Lines Target Chase: 2.2 m/2.0 m wide, 34.3 m long nitrogen-filled and nitrogen plus water-cooled (replaceable cooling panels). 17

Target pile design choices Replaceable water cooling panels are used for innermost steel layer Bulk shielding is cooled by 35,000 ft 3 /minute flow of N 2 gas Lessons learned being applied: Concrete is all outside the N 2 vessel Vessel includes all gas in high radiation (containing short-lived air-activation) Steel (emitting tritium) is all in vessel Continuously purge tritium by slow N 2 release (1 to 7 cfm) 6.2 m 18

N2 gas in LBNF target/horn vessel NuMI successfully operates target/horn in air at 700 kw. As power goes up, the production/release of 41 Ar from 1% Ar in air becomes more problematic, would need more cooldown containment time before release. Eliminate Ar from target vessel (N 2 cheapest way to do that) As power goes up, release of tritium from shielding becomes more problematic if you store (seal) it all up during running. It gets to level where workers cannot access to do repairs. Do continuous purge/release of Tritium during running, as NuMI does (N 2 cheap enough to do that) Although manageable, corrosion is better controlled without O 2 and H 2 O Dry N 2 does that (although, like NuMI & T2K, LBNF should plan to operate for periods with water leaks in vessel, hence significant humidity) Significant gas cooling is much cheaper/easier with N 2 than e.g. helium Change-over from air (for access) to N 2 (for running) is pretty easy Leaky seals not as problematic Sill don t want too much gas leakage because still produce 11 C from N 2. 19

Decay pipe region Two concentric steel pipes 4 m diam., 194 m long Static helium fill 10% more n compared to air fill Cooled by flowing 35,000 ft 3 /minute of nitrogen gas Structure dominated by concrete radiation shield 5.6 m thick Annulus N 2 cooling N 2 return 4 m Helium 5.6 m Concrete Radiation shield Multiple features to keep water out water barriers water drainage 20

Absorber Hall Complex Muon Monitoring Arrays of ionization detectors Muon Alcove Steel shielding Beam Muon Shielding (steel) Hadron Absorber 21 21

LBNF Hadron Absorber Large diameter core with uniform density to enable good muon monitoring Hadron Monitor Steel Module Steel Shielding Flexible, modular hanger design of water cooled core Concrete Al Spoiler Al Masks 1 ft thick core blocks are easily replaceable via Remote Handling Gas cooling of Bulk shielding 22

Absorber temperature and stress Temperature 43 C Max Stress 20 MPa Max Hottest Al at 2.4 MW 1 st Al Block after spoiler Input: 25 C cooling water Very mild compared to desired criteria of T < 100 C for Al and stress << than fatigue limit of 165 Mpa We have also checked that accident scenarios are OK. NuMI decay pipe upstream aluminum window has already seen as much radiation as the LBNF absorber aluminum will over its 20 year lifetime, and it has not failed. Thus we have high confidence in this design! 23

LBNF still has interesting questions to study What muon monitoring technology can withstand the radiation environment? What hadron monitoring technology can withstand the radiation environment? What radio-chemistry and tritium transport do we need to understand to assure Tritium doesn t trip us up? How can we monitor target & horn positions, warping, deterioration during operation? 24

(you may skip this ad in 15 seconds ) LBNF wants and needs international participation Designs are solidifying baseline costs and schedule needed for Fall 2019 D.O.E. CD-2 review Now is the time to get involved Already for LBNF target station: RAL/UK is taking responsibility for target. KEK/Japan (T2K) people are constructing prototypes of LBNF vessel hatch covers and horn strip-line feed-throughs. 25

European Spallation Source neutrino Super Beam Shield Blocks Horn Support Module Split Proton Beam Collimators Horns and Targets Decay Volume (He, 4x4x25 m 3 ) Beam Dump Neutrino Beam Direction 26

European Spallation Source neutrino Super Beam 5 MW 2 GeV proton kinetic energy 2.7e23 POT/year Target station layout is similar to T2K Horns, decay region, absorber in one sealed helium vessel Steel shielding around target region Thick concrete shielding everywhere Vertical access to hanging horns/target Addresses target/horn heating/stress problem by running four beams in parallel Power per target/horn system is thus similar to next generation T2K, LBNF One-horn focusing, similar to Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) Low energy neutrinos; decay region much shorter than other target stations MANY more interesting details in Marcos Dracos ESSnSB talks Mon. & Thur. 27

28

Out of time There are other lessons learned, like Underdrainage systems need to be designed with maintainability in mind Think of this as a technical system rather than just civil? Did not even mention Setting and maintaining alignment Monitoring Horn issues like inner conductor erosion, ionization currents Remote handling Conclusion: Exciting times for target station aficionados! lots going on 29