AASHTOWare Bridge Rating Design Update AASHTO SCOBS. T-19 Saratoga Springs, NY April 20, 2015

Similar documents
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Product Overview. 56 th Annual IHEEP September 2014

Photo here Todd Thompson, Chair Eric Christie, Vice Chair Spokane, WA

AASHTOWare BrDR Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tutorial PS15 - Two Span PS Adjacent Box With Straight Strands

Chapter 13 Bridge Load Rating

LRFR Ratings on Existing Bridge Inventories A Case Study

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

For Two Steel Bridges

AASHTOWare BrD/BrR Prestress Tutorial 1 Simple Span Prestressed I Beam Example

Elevation. Typical Section

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial 2016 BrDR User Requested Enhancements

INTRODUCTORY WEBINAR:

The MnDOT Bridge Load Rating Manual Scope of Work and Deliverables

LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes

MIDAS Civil 2016 v2.1 Release Webinar. PSC Composite Design Check / Load rating

STRUCTURE DESIGN CALCULATIONS, DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS & RATING REQUIREMENTS. Dave Madden, P.E. Bridge Design Engineer

BRIDGEWare Update. AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures Newport, RI June, 2005

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

Prestress Superstructure Tutorial

MIDAS Training Series

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOAD RATING REPORT GENERAL SULLIVAN BRIDGE - DOVER 200/023 OVER THE LITTLE BAY

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

EGCE 406: Bridge Design

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4)

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

Summary Minutes of The AASHTO Virtis Opis Task Force Meeting

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Tool Getting Started

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example

AASHTOWare Bridge Management Update. Todd Thompson, PE AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force Chairman

Lecture 13: Practical Design, The Future of Prestressed Concrete, and Concluding Thoughts...

Class Topics & Objectives

NCHRP LRFD DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS. Final Report September 2009

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

AASHTOWare BrDR D FEM Analysis Tutorial. Curved Steel Multi-Span 3D Example

2008 Bridge Load Rating Class 101

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

How Loads Are Distributed

LRFD Bridge Design Manual. Bridge Office MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MANUAL

High Bridge Re-Deck Project

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGES IN AREAS OF HIGH OR MODERATE SEISMICITY

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

Accelerated Bridge Construction in USA

MnDOT Bridge Load Rating and Evaluation Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS

Design Aids of NU I-Girders Bridges

STRUCTURES INSPECTION CERTIFICATION TRAINING COURSE

Cross Frame Design for Curved and Skewed Bridges

Innovations in Tied Arch Bridges

PENNDOT e-notification

Substructure Tutorial

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection

Bridge Quality Management

An Update* for the Bridge AASHTO SCOM, 2016

B R I D G E O F F I C E

B R I D G E O F F I C E

Scott Neubauer. Bridge Maintenance and Inspection Engineer Office of Bridges and Structures Iowa DOT

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

2010 STATE BRIDGE ENGINEERS QUESTIONNAIRE

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

MDOT Camelback Bridge Example

STANDARDIZED CONCRETE BRIDGES IN TEXAS. John Holt, PE, Texas Department of Transportation Ronald Medlock, PE, Texas Department of Transportation

Pro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004

2015 Mini, Small, Medium and Large Estimates

CHEF MENTEUR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

TxDOT Superheavy Bridge Report Requirements. Bridge Division

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8. Truss Tutorial. T5 - Truss Enhancements

Overview. Fracture Critical Inspection History Project Overview Research to Determine Criteria Case Studies Conclusions

T4 Floor Truss Example. AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial

RESEARCH PROJECT AT UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO

RESEARCH PROJECT AT UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

The use of 0.5 and 0.6 in. (13 and 15 mm) diameter

Superstructure Guidelines

Release Note DESIGN OF CIVIL STRUCTURES. Release Date : SEP. 1, 2015 Product Ver. : Civil 2016 (v1.1)

Steve Haines, P.E., Parsons, (303) , James Studer, Kiewit, (926) ,

ERRATA for Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd Edition (MBE-3)

Innovative, Cost-Effective Options for Short Span Steel Bridge Design

Types Of Roofs - Vault

THE NEW AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION 2008

Alewife Legislative Briefing. August 24, 2018

BRIDGE MANAGEMENT, EVALUATION AND REHABILITATION. Idaho Transportation Department Matt Farrar

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Load Rating Guidance Document Issue Date: 2018

RESEARCH PROJECT AT UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO

15. Conclusions and Future Scope

Chapter 3: Designing Steel Bridges Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E. July 2006

MERLIN-TRAP. Steel Truss Rating and Analysis Program

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 2

APPENDIX G DESIGN EXAMPLES OF END ZONE REINFORCEMENT. Table of Contents G.1 EXAMPLE I... G-1

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Transcription:

1 AASHTOWare Bridge Rating Design Update AASHTO SCOBS T-19 Saratoga Springs, NY April 20, 2015

3 Comprehensive Bridge Software AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating A Software Success Story A 16 year history of the development progression from common to complex bridge analysis for more than 40 agencies and 600 consultants!

4 Steel Girder Superstructures Rolled shapes Welded plate girders Built-up I shapes

5 P/S Concrete Superstructures Precast shapes I beams Boxes Multi-stem Tee U beams

6 Reinforced Concrete Superstructures Tee beams Slabs I beams

7 Multi-cell boxes Reinforced Concrete Post-tension Concrete

8 Trusses Deck Through Combination Counters

9 Floor Systems Girder-Floorbeam- Stringer Girder-Floorbeam Truss-Floorbeam- Stringer Truss-Floorbeam Floorbeam-Stringer

10 Floor Systems Floor trusses

11 R/C Box Culverts

12 3D Analysis R/C Multi-girder

13 3D Analysis P/S Multi-girder

14 3D Analysis - Steel Multi-girder Straight 3D

15 3D Analysis Curved Steel Girder

16 Permit Routing & Nonstandard Gage Billerica Carlisle Concord Burlington Lexington Lincoln Bedford North Road Carlisle Road Concord Road Springs Road Pine Hill Road Old Billerica Road Burlington Road Page Road Page Road Shawsheen Road Brooksbie Road Hartwell Road South Road Summer Street Hartwell Avenue The Great Road Bedford Road Grove Street Bedford Street Middlesex Turnpike Burlington Mall 4 4 225 225 62 62 62 3 3 128 128

17 Substructure - Piers

18 AASHTO Spec Checking

19 AASHTO Spec Checking Multiple versions supported

20 AASHTOWare Bridge Rating Current Participation City/County/Territory Phoenix, AZ Puerto Rico Maricopa, AZ NY City, NY Army Corps of Engr. NJ Turnpike Washington D.C. Country Manitoba, Canada Consultant Licenses = 573 Agency Licenses = 39 Map Key Non- Licensee Licensee

21 AASHTOWare Bridge Design Current Participation City/County/Territory Cincinnati, OH Country Manitoba, Canada Consultant Licenses = 35 Agency Licenses = 17 Map Key Non- Licensee Licensee

22 Enhancements for 6.7 June 2015 User Group Top Enhancements

23 Enhancements for 6.7 June 2015 Gusset Plate Rating Includes LRFR Truss Rating

24 Enhancements for 6.7 June 2015 Splice Analysis and Rating for Steel Girders LRFD, LRFR, LFR Hybrid splices Splices for Curved Girders Simple for Dead Load, Continuous for Live Load

25 Enhancements for 6.7 June 2015 Cut Top Strand for Prestress Concrete Beams Splayed Girder Computation of Distribution Factors Implement RC Slab System in Substructure LRFR for Floor System AISC Steel Shape Update

26 Enhancements for 6.7 June 2015 LRFR Lateral Flange Moment Report AASHTO Engine Specification updates MBE 2 nd Edition, 2015 interim LRFD 7 th Edition 2015 interim Other Maintenance Improvements Allow negative epsilon in concrete shear computation Report actions for both sides of a point-of-interest User-defined DL distribution by percentage

27 Design Tools - Update Automated Prestressed Concrete Beam Design Completed the software design Phase 1 Single Beam Design Phase 2 Framing Plan Design Nearly complete with the user interface development for Phase 1 Release of Phase 1 1 st quarter 2016

28 Design Tools Update Steel Plate Girder Design Optimization Software design is in progress Defining requirements Preparing user interface mockups Formulating the steel design algorithm

29 Modernization Update The modernization proposes to create more powerful, easier to use tools to assist agencies in designing and load rating their inventory in a more cost-effective manner.

30 Modernization Update Why Modernize? Life span of the Bridge Design/Bridge Rating predecessor, BARS, was 20+ years It has been nearly 20 years since the design and development of the current system began and 16 years since it s April 1999 release (formerly known as Virtis) The design is based on the technology of the late 1990s.

31 Modernization Update Why Modernize? When development started: Windows 95 or NT was common and was replacing Windows 3.11 Needed a 386DX processor Needed minimum 4 MB RAM (8 MB recommended) Hard drives in the 40-100 MB size were common There have been 7 versions of Windows OS since development began: Windows 95, 98, ME, XP, Vista, 7, and 8

32 Modernization Update Why Modernize? Currently: Windows 7 or 8 64 bit Memory 16 to 32 GB common Hard drives in 1 or 2 TB are common, very fast solid state drives becoming common in 250-500 GB range Tremendous changes in OS and hardware over the last 15-20 years

33 Modernization Update Why Modernize? Recent addition of 3D analysis pushes the computational limits of the current system Software tools for development have significantly improved User expectations have matured Hardware has improved, need to take full advantage of new hardware capabilities (e.g. multi-threading)

34 Modernization Update Benefits: It is time to migrate to a new architecture using the latest development tools. Significantly upgrade the core technology to a modern software architecture that better utilizes current and future hardware, and the latest software development technologies Improve analysis performance by taking advantage of multi-threading (running multiple tasks simultaneously) capabilities of the latest hardware

35 Modernization Update Benefits: Improve and simplify the user interface - easier to use for beginners without losing modeling flexibility for advanced users Improve reporting capabilities Reduce maintenance costs Reduce implementation time for new features

36 Modernization Update Progress: Conducted a workshop with stakeholders to identify the requirements that drive the software design. Completed an architecture design that will satisfy those requirements. Prepared conceptual user interface mockups of the modernized user interface. Solicitation for funding later this year (2015)

37 Modernization Update In conclusion Improve efficiency for more than 600 consultants and 40 agencies. It s all about the data! Licensing agencies have an enormous investment in their bridge data. The data and your investment will be preserved.

38 Thank you