UNI Europa ICTS position on the European Single Market for electronic communications

Similar documents
The context Telecoms sector EU competitiveness and innovation EU is lagging behind Single Market crown jewel annual 0.9% GDP/ 110 billion Urgent

BEREC views on the European Parliament first reading legislative resolution on the European Commission s proposal for a Connected Continent Regulation

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0185(COD)

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0185(COD)

EU Telecoms Sector: Regulatory Developments, Threats and. Opportunities

15 June, Brussels. Ladies and Gentlemen, good morning,

Connected continent Costas Louropoulos, EETT President

Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 February 2015 (OR. en)

Labour law - cornerstone of Europe s social dimension

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. The state of the European carbon market in (Text with EEA relevance)

Industrial Renaissance. The Role of Europe, the Contribution of Italy. Speech of President Fabio Storchi

EUROPE NEEDS CHANGES

EN 1 EN 1. INTRODUCTION

Questions and answers on 2030 framework on climate and energy

European Confederation of Independent Trade Unions (CESI) Opinion Adopted by the Presidium of CESI

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

Mergers: Commission clears proposed merger between Telefónica Deutschland (Telefónica) E-Plus subject to conditions-frequently asked questions

EUROPE 2020 A European strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

The new European Electronic Communications Code (EECC)

10109/14 KM/ek 1 DG E2B

The Vision and Objectives underpinning the liberalisation of the EU telecom sector

Draft resolution on working hours and work/life balance

A CER Statement on Brexit

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

EU STRATEGY FOR CSR

Progress since the 2004 White Paper on services of general interest

UNION EUROPEENNE DE L ARTISANAT ET DES PETITES ET MOYENNES ENTREPRISES EUROPÄISCHE UNION DES HANDWERKS UND DER KLEIN- UND MITTELBETRIEBE

Comments on the BEREC s medium term strategy outlook

15050/17 VK/nc 1 DGE 2A

ETNO Reflection Document on the European Commission Communication on Challenges for the European Information Society beyond 2005

Independent Regulators Group Rail. IRG Rail

7007/15 ADB/mz 1 DG B 3A

Comments on the BEREC Work Programme for 2010

INTUG Position Statement on the European Commission s proposals following review of the European Telecommunications Framework.

EUROCITIES response to the circular economy package. February 2016

Telekom Austria Group s input to BEREC s Consultation on Draft Guidelines on Net Neutrality and Transparency

Rules and Regulations on GMO-derived food products in the European Union Lynn Insall UK Food and Drink Federation

CONTAINER GLASS PRODUCTION UNDER THE EU-ETS REFORM POST-2020:

Regulation 2.0 the future challenges in telecom regulation

BEREC Strategy

The Review of the Telecommunications Regulatory Framework

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

Reflection Document of DG INFSO and DG MARKT about Creative Content in a European Digital Single Market: Challenges for the Future

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

GSMA comments on the Draft BEREC Report on OTT services (BoR (15) 142)

CEIOPS-SEC-182/10. December CEIOPS 1 response to European Commission Green Paper on Audit Policy: Lessons from the Crisis

Statement regarding a European single market for electronic communications

PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE ON WORKING CONDITIONS FOR TEMPORARY WORKERS (COM (2002) 149 FINAL)

Keynote ECTA Conference

Ensuring Progress delivers results

UEAPME 1 reply to the first phase consultation of the Social Partners on a New Start for Work-Life Balance

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 28 February /05 COMPET 33 MI 22 IND 13 RECH 38 ECOFIN 63 SOC 85 AG 10 EDUC 33 ENV 86 POLGEN 8

ROADMAP. A. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives

We appreciate your feedback

Commission questionnaire Open Internet and Net Neutrality UK Music observations

SOLIDAR CONTRIBUTION TO EUROPEAN COMMISSION GUIDE ON SOCIALLY-RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

IDAL & THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS)

BEUC RESPONSE TO THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON SMART REGULATION

Public Consultation Standardisation

by Mogens Aarestrup Vind and Fie Anna Aaby Hansen, Eversheds Advokataktieselskab 1

ACI EUROPE POSITION on AVIATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Horizon Europe Stakeholder Consultation Synopsis Report. Accompanying the document.

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

BRITISH FILM INSTITUTE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ISSUED PAPER ASSESSING STATE AID FOR FILMS AND OTHER AUDIVISUAL WORKS SEPTEMBER 2011

DCMS Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review Summary of findings

Draft Work Programme 2011 BEREC Board of Regulators. - for Public Consultation -

EU cultural policies and programmes. Barbara Stacher, European Commission

Next Generation Networks: Policy and Regulatory Challenges

COMMENTS ON GREEN PAPER ON PPP AND COMMUNITY LAW ON PUBLIC CONTRACTS AND CONCESSIONS

European Economic and Social Committee OPINION

Executive Summary. CEN Identification number in the EC register: CENELEC Identification number in the EC register:

DRAFT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Personal Protective Equipment

BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT. Consultation Response: Department for Culture, Media & Sport. Tackling Partial Not-Spots in Mobile Phone Coverage

Sustainable urban mobility in EU transport strategy

Eu Public- Private Smart Move High Level Group

JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE

ESCO strategic framework

Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Angel Dzhambazki (PE v01-00)

Putting energy efficiency first: consuming better, getting cleaner

6 Portability of non- personal data, Interoperability and standards

Audiovisual Media Services Directive Position Paper

Consultation on proposed strategies for Digital Terrestrial Broadcasting, Third-Generation mobile telephony (UMTS), and Fixed Wireless Access (FWA)

Ladies and gentlemen,

PES and older workers: Qualification counselling and training subsidies

MEET2030 BUSINESS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH TOWARDS A CARBON NEUTRAL ECONOMY HOW CAN PORTUGAL S ECONOMY GROW WHILE CREATING EMPLOYMENT?

Parliamentary briefing: Second reading of the Agriculture Bill

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 5 December 2008 (09.12) (OR. fr) 16914/08

Research and Innovation

telecoms regulatory framework for

Position Paper. Cable Europe position paper on the Telecoms Review. Executive Summary. Policy objectives

telecom regulation The stakes are high. The vision of the By Wolfgang Bock, Björn Röber, and Peter Soos

Council of the European Union Brussels, 25 November 2016 (OR. en)

A new broadband Universal Service Obligation: Consultation on Design

Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 April 2017 (OR. en)

OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. 3374th Council meeting. Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs. Brussels, 9 March 2015

Council conclusions on eco-innovation:enabling the transition towards a circular economy

CONTRIBUTION TO GSR 2018 GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM FOR REGULATORS (GSR-18)

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Transcription:

UNI Europa ICTS position on the European Single Market for electronic communications As a trade union federation representing 1.2 million workers in 41 countries in the ICT sector in Europe, UNI Europa ICTS and its member organisations are convinced that the ICT sector is key for European economic recovery. As the European Commission correctly points out, ICT should be fully recognized as a source of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth." 1 UNI Europa ICTS believes that it is of vital importance that we establish a European legislation that drives innovation and encourages investment in networks; that strengthens European companies and creates quality jobs for ICT workers in Europe. Therefore, we are concerned about the proposed regulation on the European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent ((COM 2013) 627 final) that is currently debated by the Council of the European Union. Despite the European Commission s announcement in its initial proposal that it wants to drive innovation, boost the European economy and create new jobs, we think that the regulation does not help to reach these objectives and does not reflect the reality of the ICT sector as it is experienced by our member organisations. Though the European Parliament has already brought some positive amendments to the initial Commission text in the vote on 3 rd April 2014 (e.g. on spectrum and the digital divide), we still think that the proposal in its current version does not address the key challenges for the ICT industry and its workforce. Whereas Commission and Parliament deal with some topics in extreme detail (roaming, consumer protection, spectrum), the two most important issues for the ICT sector employment and investment are addressed in a rather superficial way. Employment According to the European Commission, the completion of the single market in electronic communication could increase the EU s gross domestic product by 110 billion euros a year. 2 The Commission states that the implementation of the proposed regulation would create 3.8 million jobs. 3 This statement is highly questionable. In fact, ICT companies and their employees will have to face important structural challenges in the next years, that will jeopardize up to 250 000 jobs in Europe by 2020, i.e. ever 4 th job in the sector. The turnover of European telecom companies has been decreased due to new technologies, high costs of investment in the networks and the arrival of OTT players in the market. Though the proposed regulation is supposed to provide growth and employment, it remains unclear where exactly these new jobs should be created i.e. in which Member States, in which economic sector and in which job categories. We agree that there is a potential for innovation and job creation as regards IT services as the upgrade of network and equipment will demand new solutions and new skills. However, even were the assumption to be correct as regards the employment creation potential of cloud computing, it does not take into account that jobs would also be lost or displaced as a result of associated re-organisations of business processes and productivity increases. Moreover, if the European decision-making bodies do not address the employment question with rigour and anticipation, we could experience a phenomenon of precarisation of the working and salary conditions in the sector. The proposed legislation does not take into account that the proposed measures to move towards a single market in electronic communications and implicitly the consolidation of markets will highly impact on existing jobs in the ICT sector. 1 COM (2013) 627 final, p. 2 2 COM(2013) 634 final, p. 4 3 COM(2013) 627 final, p. 5

UNI Europa ICTS therefore calls upon the Commission to clarify and elaborate its prognosis on job creation and to provide more details as regards the consequences of the legislation. Furthermore, we ask the decision-makers at European level to ensure that the creation of quality jobs must take place in Europe. Investment The text adopted by the European Parliament on 3 rd April 2014 mentions the necessity of investment in high-speed networks and that infrastructure should not be restricted to densely populated areas. Though this is a positive signal as regards the effort to bridge the digital divide, neither the European Commission, nor the European Parliament have sufficiently explained how the necessary infrastructure investments should be made as regards the timeline and the amount of investment. Furthermore, the proposed Regulation does not refer to the ICTS sector s ecosystem. The decline in employment and revenues of the European telecom industry has already impacted on European supplying industry. Nothing is said about the future development of European telecom equipment providers for example, that are slowly disappearing. There is also no reference to the role of OTTs in a telecom single market. It needs to be clarified how the new Regulation would impact the relevant industry players in the whole of the ICT ecosystem. OTTs are the first consumers of broadband networks and they receive a lot of the added value produced in the sector. Therefore, OTTs should also contribute to the financing of investments and we need to address the issue of R&D, the fiscal system, the repartition of benefits etc. Another element that UNI Europa ICTS is questioning is that the regulation proposal is based on the assumption that competitiveness would be the key to rapid deployment of broadband and ultrafast networks. Though it is true that Europe is lagging behind as regards the roll out of 4G, the key for other countries advance lies in the public support rather than in competition. For example, South Korea (which has a population of one-tenth that of the European Union) has an active industrial intervention policy on the basis of which it is launching a new initiative aimed at supporting 5G developments that is supported by public policy with an initial budget of 1.1 billion euros. Compared to this high level of public investment, and the advantages of the density of population which South Korea enjoys, the expected 700 million euros of European public funding for 5 G infrastructure until 2020 do not seem to be enough. 4 Contrary to the European Commission, we think that robust public policy support and investment in technical development are the basis for innovation and investment rather than just competition. If we want to be able to meet the challenges, we need to urgently develop a European investment plan to for an additional 2% of EU GDP per year (around 260 billion euros per year) over a 10-year period to support the development of our economies and to boost employment and innovation. This plan aims at opening a New path for Europe 5 to end the crisis and austerity and to develop ambitious investments to enable a strong and sustainable growth that can create up to 11 million of quality jobs in the long term, especially for young people. This plan has to be accompanied by a strengthening of the European social pillar to counterbalance the social and fiscal competition. Also, we do not agree that there should be a correlation between the size of an operator and its profit. There are examples of successful local national service providers that contradict the thesis that operators depend on scale to be profitable. 4 Cf. the European Commission s 5G Public-Private Partnership initiative, http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2013/pdf/ppp/5g_factsheet.pdf 5 Cf. the ETUC campaign A new path for Europe, http://www.etuc.org/

The single market for electronic communications The overall objective of the legislative proposal is a single market for electronic communications that should speed up the liberalization and integration of the 28 European markets. UNI Europa ICTS would like to underline that this consolidation of operators should be embedded in a system that protects social and labour rights and therefore, it must be accompanied by measures that respect labour and social protection, support social dialogue, the involvement of trade unions and ensure good working conditions across the EU Member States. We agree with the Commission that we need durable and sustainable European actors of different kinds and sizes in the ICT sector in the future, capable of delivering capital investment plans and able to provide training and development opportunities, and good jobs. But we also need a guarantee that any market consolidation happens in a social way and with enough time to allow a good management of the social impacts. Consolidation is not an end in itself. Moreover, operators need to be able to receive a reasonable return on their investments. Policies that only focus on low end-user prices can discourage operators from investing in new high quality networks and services. What we need is effective policies that stimulate employment creation, encourage investment, protect employees and safeguard and extend universal service access. We call upon the decision-makers in the European institutions to explain which commitments the EU will take for employment, for the protection of workers rights, for their training, for the promotion of new services and new service concepts, for public investment and for universal service. Roaming We recognise that cross border roaming charges for data and calls remain artificially high, and we believe there is a need to establish prices for telecommunications services that reflect the real cost of providing those services. We also agree that there is a need to protect mobile users through increased transparency and facilities to avoid bill shocks, including the ability of end users to define maximum financial limits for usage charges. However, roaming charges have historically provided an important source of revenue for mobile operators to support investment in technology, innovation and jobs. UNI Europa ICTS would like to point out that the Commission s and the European Parliament s approach towards the abolition of roaming charges and the lowering of prices has a negative impact on investment and employment 6. European decision-makers should take into account that complex technologies and quality of service have a price if you want to provide the necessary investment and create employment in the ICT sector. With the abolition of roaming charges, UNI Europa ICTS believes it is essential that mobile operators have the ability to compensate for the reduced revenue they will experience through price freedom in other areas where this is justified. This will help to avoid any threat to network investment and employment levels caused by the reduction in revenue from lower roaming prices. Moreover, if the European decision-makers want a reduction of roaming charges, it is vital that this is a mid- to long-term strategy and that operators do not have to apply it immediately. This would give operators the time to change their activities and to develop new business models to generate the revenue that is needed to continue investment and the provision of quality services. Spectrum 6 In this context, the Commission refers to an annual revenue loss of 1.650 million EUR (sic) resulting from loss of roaming revenues and a 700 million EUR decrease on revenue linked to international calls is estimated in a worst case scenario. Cf. SWD (2013) 331 final, p. 3.

UNI Europa ICTS supports the approach to harmonise the use and assignment of spectrum in the EU. Spectrum is a public good and will play a key role in eliminating the digital divide, but a coordinated process is needed to ensure that formal coverage and universal access requirements will be considered when defining the assignment modalities. Spectrum harmonisation should provide clear rules on auctions and should be based on European standards to support European research and equipment providers. Auction proceeds should benefit the investments in the sector. UNI Europa ICTS welcomes that the European Parliament has brought some positive amendments to the initial Commission text in the vote on 3 rd April 2014 as regards a better harmonisation of spectrum trading and leasing and the management of radio frequencies for new mobile applications. Open internet/ Net neutrality The open internet is of societal importance, as is the right to communication. UNI Europa ICTS supports the amendments voted in the European Parliament for a binding reference to the principle of net neutrality and an open internet. We note that operators prioritise internet traffic based on differentiated services as a necessary feature of the market which serves to meet a level of customer demand for enhanced service quality. However, we are concerned that restrictions persists for a significant number of end users (e.g. slowing of download speeds for video content streaming). Furthermore, there is a real danger that data consumption will continue to be choked because of both the increased number of consumers accessing the network and the larger volume of traffic being generated. While operators need flexibility to manage the capacity between specialized services and internet access services to ensure the best end-user experience, we must ensure that this does not result in operators limiting access, judging content or degrading quality of service for the general Internet user. Furthermore, the problem of monopolistic situations if an operator has arrangements with large content providers that exclude small competitors needs to be addressed. We believe that minimum standards should be introduced which can be maintained through regulatory enforcement to ensure an acceptable level of service for all end users and which act against both restrictive practices and traffic overload. We therefore welcome that the European Parliament has addressed these issues and improved the initial proposal by including provisions regarding traffic management and specialised services. UNI Europa ICTS also wants to underline that continued investment in broadband networks across Europe to increase network capacity will also play an important role in addressing these issues, and therefore the European institutions should do everything within their power to encourage and incentivise network investment. Consumer rights UNI Europa supports the approach to increase consumer rights and transparency, e.g. when contract provisions are not met. We think however that the quality of service is very important. This refers also to the social quality of services, i.e. the right to universal access to fast broadband. Unfortunately, quality services are not for free: The pressure on costs automatically means pressure on working conditions. We would like to remind the decision-makers at EU level that quality services need investment and that a model based on continually falling prices is not in the interest of securing investment nor is it, in the long-term, in the interest of the consumers. Single EU authorisation The Commission has proposed a simplified regulation with a unique authorisation system for all 28 Member States. This provision raises various difficulties: First of all, national regulators will probably be very reluctant to adapt it and conflicts between the EU and national authorities seem to be programmed. Moreover, we think that a single authorisation system with a European passport for operators will lead to licence shopping. Operators might prefer to apply for the license in

countries with fewer and comparably low social obligations and standards, which could lead to social dumping. This danger of an undermining of social standards must be taken seriously and a social impact assessment of this measure would be necessary. UNI Europa ICTS therefore welcomes the European Parliament s removal of this authorisation scheme. Consultation The European Parliament has voted in favour of a review of the entire regulatory framework for electronic communications by June 2016, based on a public consultation. UNI Europa ICTS wants to underline that trade unions are an important stakeholder and should be consulted in the legislative process, especially as regards the review procedure outlined in the Parliament s position. We therefore call upon the European decision-makers and the National Regulatory Authorities to consider more the future perspective of employees in general and in the companies of the ICT sector in Europe in particular.