ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS the City of Tacoma was selected to participate in the U.S.

Similar documents
Req. # Amended , ORDINANCE NO

THE MLK DISTRICT. Help Us Plan the Future of. The MLK District

City of Tacoma. Planning Commission. October 18, 2017

NORTH DOWNTOWN SUBAREA PLAN

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Attachment 1. Ordinance

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Plan Background. Introduction. Purpose and Relationship to GMA Planning Process

BEFORE THE DIRECTOR CITY OF TACOMA

City of Tacoma Community and Economic Development Department

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Revising Freestanding Solar Energy Systems Permit Requirements

a. i. ii. b. i. ii. iii. iv. c. i. ii. iii. d. e. i. ii. iii. iv. f. g. h. i. ii.

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

EVOLVING STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)

City of Granite Falls 2017 Comprehensive Plan Update

Shoreline Master Program Update Public Participation Plan. City of Tacoma, Washington

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT KYLE BUTTERWICK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the State of California Government Code requires zoning to be consistent with the City s General Plan; and

ORDINANCE NO significant risk to public safety and the environment due to the high operating pressure and the

2) Pass a motion to adopt the Resolution with revisions 3) Do not pass a motion to adopt the Resolution

Based on the review of the City of Sultan s comprehensive plan, the following recommendation is proposed for action.

CHAPTER 37 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ARTICLE I INTERESTED PARTIES REGISTRY REGISTRATION RULES

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

WAUKEE CENTRAL URBAN RENEWAL PLAN WAUKEE CENTRAL URBAN RENEWAL AREA WAUKEE, IOWA

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Surface Mining and Reclamation Ordinance Text Amendments

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING COMMISSION OF PHELPS COUNTY, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:

MARIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ALEX HINDS, DIRECTOR

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY, STATE

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM

DRAFT RESOLUTION NO

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #3

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION...

Tideflats Interim Regulations

Legislation Passed April 5, 2016

LID Code Consistency Amendments Ordinance #7 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO.

Agenda Item No. 8c July 8, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

Shoreline Master Program Update Public Participation Plan. City of Tacoma, Washington

City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft EIS

City of Gig Harbor 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update

Legislation Passed January 12, 2016

STAFF REPORT CHELAN COUNTY PUD DAROGA DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM

EXHIBIT 2 ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1301

Capital Facilities Element

SECTION VI. DAIRY CONFORMANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL Snohomish County, Washington AMENDED EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO

1 of 6 9/8/2012 3:47 PM

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, two hazardous liquid pipelines extend through the western portion of

CITY COUNTY COUNCIL PROPOSAL NO. 410, 2017 CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY, INDIANA

ORDINANCE NO. RD-3211

County of San Mateo. Inter-Departmental Correspondence. Department: GOVERNING BOARD File #: Board Meeting Date: 7/25/2017

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura ( County ), State of California, ordains as follows:

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Snohomish County region by action of their respective county councils pursuant to RCW

Kitsap County UGA Sizing and Composition Remand. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

SEWRPC Model Zoning Ordinance ZONING REGULATIONS FOR WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS

2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROCEDURES

Introduced by Councilmember AN ORDINANCE

Appendix A. Hamilton Sub Area Plan and Urban Growth Area Expansion Report

RE: WAVERLEY WEST SOUTHEAST NEIGHBOURHOOD AREA STRUCTURE PLAN. Standing Policy Committee on Property and Development

EXECUTIVE/COUNCIL APPROVAL FORM EX~IVE RECOMMENDATION: -.X_ PLAN OTHER

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROTEST OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

Shoreline Master Program

Chapter 1 Introduction

Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review and Update. Board and Planning Commission Joint Work-Study November 23, 2015

Executive Summary. Figure ES-1. Historical and Forecasted Regional Population and Employment

CITY OF CHELAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. Introduction

Agenda Cover Memorandum. D Approval [8:1 For discussion D Feedback requested D For your information

7/15/2015 Item #10A Page 1

CHAPTER House Bill No. 7001

DRAFT. P reface P.1 PURPOSE AND IMPORTANCE OF THIS PLAN. Moscow Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN P.1

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SUBMISSION March 28, 2017

Book No. 19 Page No. 7 CITY OF EAST PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND Ordinance No. 578

Attachment A - VISION DRAFT Environment Policy Matrix Working Draft February 14, 2019

Snohomish County Council Planning and Community Development Committee Jackson Board Room April 13, :00 a.m. MINUTES

CITY OF SEATTLE DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE BY THE OFFICE OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OPCD)

City of Calistoga Staff Report

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RESOLUTION #R

STAFF REPORT. Planning Commission. Anjanette Simon, Associate Planner


Chapter II. Community Growth Strategy A. COMMUNITY GROWTH STRATEGY DIAGRAM AND DESIGNATIONS. 1. Adoption of Growth Strategy Diagram

City of Oak Grove, Missouri. Economic Development Incentives Policy

CITY OF ASHLAND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ASHLAND INVESTMENT CO., LLC HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

WHEREAS, the Board has previously so adopted a wastewater supply system comprehensive plan, and

ORDINANCE NO.: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY GENERAL ORDINANCE CODE TO PROHIBIT HIGH-INTENSITY OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 861 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Government Code Section (j)(3) defines small residential rooftop solar energy systems; and

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: PROPOSED BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA FALLS, MONTANA AS FOLLOWS:

1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Project Background

EROSION, SEDIMENTATION, ETC

A regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Canby, Minnesota was held on August 5 th, 2014 in the City Council Chambers.

Statutory Changes to the Community Planning Act (Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes):

CITY OF ST. MICHAEL WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. MICHAEL HEREBY ORDAINS:

Overlake Plaza Master Plan

ORDINANCE 4195 RATES FOR WATER UTILITY SERVICE

Commercial Zoning Update

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Transcription:

Req. #1-015 ORDINANCE NO. 28 1 AN ORDINANCE relating to community and economic development; adopting the 2 South Downtown Subarea Plan as an element of the City s Comprehensive Plan. WHEREAS the City of Tacoma was selected to participate in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development s Sustainable Communities Regional 6 Planning Grant Program, and 7 WHEREAS the Grant program is a three-year, $5 million grant dedicated 8 towards a Growing Transit Communities program coordinated by the Puget Sound ~ Regional Council ( PSRC ) which aims to: (1) support local efforts throughout the region to promote socially equitable transit-oriented development; (2) focus new job and housing growth in the vicinity of new high-capacity transit systems; () put jobs 1 and opportunity closer to where people live; and () sustain a healthy environment and 1 a healthy economy in the decades to come, and 15 WHEREAS, the City of Tacoma, as a Puget Sound Regional Council Catalyst 16 Project partner, has received the sum of $500,000 to develop a long-range Subarea 17 Plan and area-wide SEPA Environmental Impact Statement ( EIS ) addressing future development standards and incentives and coordinated infrastructure investments in South Downtown, and 21 WHEREAS the South Downtown Subarea Plan and ElS area encompasses 22 600 acres of historic industrial and commercial land in the southern half of Tacoma s 2 downtown and includes five distinct districts: (1) Dome District; (2) Brewery District; 2 () UWT/Museum District; () Thea Foss Waterway and Shoreline; and (5) Hillside 25. District, and Ordi -01 5.doc-JHC/tok 1

1 WHEREAS the Subarea has a diversely built environment, including 2 approximately 100 historic properties, but is also characterized by a relatively high concentration of underutilized land and buildings, and WHEREAS the unique characteristics of the area represent an unmatched 6 opportunity to absorb growth and transform into a transit-oriented community which is ~ expected to absorb more than 0,000 new residents and 0,000 new jobs over the 8 next twenty years, and WHEREAS broad goals of the project include: (1) pre-approving up to 0 10 million square feet of new development space through the SEPA process; (2) streamlining development regulations; () prioritization of transportation 1 investments; () identifying and prioritizing necessary infrastructure improvements; (5) 1 planning for parks, trails, and open space; and (6) identification of potential funding 15 strategies, and 16 WHEREAS on August 28, 1, the City of Tacoma and the University of 17 Washington, as co-lead agencies, issued a non-project ElS for the South Downtown Subarea Plan, and WHEREAS a non-project EIS involves a cumulative environmental impact and 22 by-project basis, and 2 WHEREAS the non-project EIS eliminates the need for subsequent 2 environmental review associated with project-specific development proposals that 25 comply with the Subarea Plan s development regulations relevant to the proposed project, and Ordl -0 1 5.doc-JHC/tok 21 mitigation analysis for the entire Subarea, rather than piecemeal analysis on a project- -2-

1 WHEREAS the non-project EIS provides a developer with certainty and 2 predictability, thereby eliminating duplicative environmental review at the project level and furthering the goals of the State Environmental Policy Act ( SEPA ) and the Growth Management Act ( GMA ), and 6 WHEREAS the co-lead agencies prepared a non-project EIS pursuant to RCW ~.21 C., known as Transit lnf ill Review, and the co-lead agencies completed the 8 planning and environmental review of this subarea plan EIS in conformance with the ~ statutory requirements of RCW.21C. and the Tacoma Municipal Code ( TMC ), 10 and WHEREAS given the sunset provision of RCW.21C.(5)(a) and (b), the 1 co-lead agencies also complied with RCW.21 C.01 and RCW.21C.0 1 (planned action) and RCW.21C.229 (mtill exemption), to provide additional SEPA 15 authority to facilitate and expedite the development contemplated in the subarea plan 16 it the appeal-related provisions in RCW.21 C.(5)(a) and (b) expire, and 17 WHEREAS for a non-project ElS completed under RCW.21C., the SEPA-based appeal opportunity occurs in conjunction with the adoption of the subarea plan, and WHEREAS there are no SEPA noticing requirements for 21 subsequent, site-specific development or redevelopment projects that are consistent 22 with the subarea plan and development regulations, and 2 WHEREAS consistent with RCW.21C., a proposed development will not 2 be subject to project-specific SEPA-based administrative or judicial appeals if the 25... proposed development is: (1) proposed within 10 (ten) years of the issuance of the Ordi -01 5.doc-JHC/tok --

subarea Final EIS; (2) situated within the subarea; and () consistent with the adopted 1 subarea plan and development regulations, and 2 WHEREAS the EIS acknowledges that there will be sufficient utility infrastructure, transportation capacity, and open space to serve anticipated growth, for the next five to ten years, and 6 Whereas the EIS sets forth monitoring protocols and tiered thresholds of 7 development that would trigger a suite of mitigation measures to provide for sufficient 8 infrastructure within the subarea, and WHEREAS public notification for the Subarea Plan and EIS was provided 10 jointly throughout the project and included an initial Community Meeting on December 1, ; an initial Scoping Meeting held on December 15, ; and notice 1 of the issuance of the draft Subarea Plan, draft EIS, and notice of the subsequent 1 Public Hearing on April 25, 1, and 15 WHEREAS a notice of availability was mailed upon issuance of the final EIS 16 and included notice of the draft Subarea Plan Planning Commission Public Hearing 17 held on September, 1, and WHEREAS the Planning Commission concluded that, as proposed, the South Downtown Subarea Plan and EIS are consistent with the Comprehensive plan with a 21 preliminary maximum build-out target of million square feet of new development, 22 and 2 WHEREAS the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council 2 adopt the draft South Downtown Subarea Plan as a new element of the 25 Comprehensive Plan and adopt the proposed amendments to the TMC Chapters 1.06 Zoning and 1.06A Downtown Tacoma, and Ordl -01 5.doc-JHC/tok --

1 WHEREAS the recommended actions are presented in two separate 2 ordinances for ease of review, consisting of this ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Plan with the addition of the South Downtown Subarea Plan and a separate ordinance to amend TMC Chapters 1.06 and 1.06A to implement the 6 Subarea Plan, and 7 WHEREAS Chapter 1.02 of the TMC details the procedures and criteria for 8 amending the Plan, including review of potential amendments by the Commission and ~ City staff, and the requirement that potential amendments be subject to a public review 10 process, and WHEREAS, considering the public testimony received at a hearing on 1 September, 1, together with analyses and assessments completed by City 1 staff, the Commission developed proposed amendments to the Plan, which were 15 compiled in the Planning Commission s Findings and Recommendations Report 16 forwarded to the City Council on November 6, 1, and 17 WHEREAS the proposed amendments to the Plan conform to the requirements of the GMA, and were developed and are consistent with the following: (1) the State Environmental Policy Act; (2) VISION 0, the growth management, environmental, 21 economic, and transportation vision for the Central Puget Sound region; 22 () Transportation 0, the action plan for transportation in the Central Puget Sound 2 region; () the Countywide Planning Policies for Pierce County; (5) Substitute 2 Resolution No. 7070, which provides guiding principles for the City s future growth; 25 and (6) TMC Chapter 1.02, and Ordi -01 5.doc-JHC/tok -5-

1 WHEREAS pursuant to TMC Chapter 1.02, the City Council is required to 2 conduct a public hearing prior to consideration for adoption, and WHEREAS the City Council conducted a public hearing on the Planning Commission s recommendations on December, 1, and 6 WHEREAS the effective date of the ordinance for the South Downtown ~ Subarea and Comprehensive Plan adoption shall be January 1, 1; Now, Therefore, 8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF TACOMA: Section 1. That the City Council adopts the Findings and Recommendations of 10 the Planning Commission, dated November 6, 1. 1 Section 2. That the City of Tacoma Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended with the addition of the South Downtown Subarea Plan as set forth in the attached 1 Exhibit A. 15 16 17 Adopted DEC 1 7 1 ~ Attest: Mayor 21 City Clerk 22 Approved as to form: 2 Qc~f\, 2 Deputy Cit~A~ttorney 25 Ordl -0 1 5.doc-JHC/tok -6-