Information for File # MVP SJW

Similar documents
Information for File # RJH

Information for File # BGO

Information for: File # RQM

Information for File # DAS

Information for File # MVP SJW

Information for File # BGO

Public Notice ISSUED: April 5, 2019 EXPIRES: May 6, 2019

Information for File # ARC

Information for File # CLJ

Information for File #MVP MVM

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit Application Tips

Information for File # PRH

Information for File # MHK

Information for File # SLM

Public Meeting. US Highways 18 & 281 and SD Highway 50 From Douglas County Line to SD46 Charles Mix County

Public Notice ISSUED: May 21, 2013 EXPIRES: June 20, 2013

Public Notice ISSUED: 25 September 2015 EXPIRES: 09 October 2015

Berkshire Region TIP Project Data Form

Public Notice ISSUED: September 23, 2013 EXPIRES: October 22, 2013

Name, area and types of waters (including wetlands) subject to loss

Public Notice ISSUED: April 12, 2019 EXPIRES: May 13, 2019

Rehabilitation of Highway Pavements an Engineering Challenge

Information for File # RMM

Public Notice ISSUED: March 18, 2016 EXPIRES: April 18, 2016

Information for File # MVP MHK

Public Notice ISSUED: 20-JAN-2016 EXPIRES: 19-FEB-2016

Public Notice ISSUED: 20 January 2015 EXPIRES: 20 February 2015

Public Notice ISSUED: 11 February 2019 EXPIRES: 13 March 2019

PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE

Public Notice ISSUED: December 11, 2018 EXPIRES: January 10, 2019

Shoulder Widening Prioritization Discussion

Public Notice ISSUED: March 1, 2016 EXPIRES: March 31, 2016

Public Notice ISSUED: July 13, 2018 EXPIRES: August 13, 2018

Pavement Management Systems. Tool for Keeping Pavement Networks in a State of Good Repair. Dr. Nick Vitillo

Public Notice ISSUED: March 14, 2018 EXPIRES: April 13, 2018

Information for File # TAW

Public Notice ISSUED: EXPIRES:

Public Notice ISSUED: July 17, 2014 EXPIRES: August 17, 2014

Streets Evaluation Manual

Public Meeting. US Highway 81 From 306 th St. to 303 rd St. & 300 th St. Yankton County NH 0081(103)6 PCN 04G5. Brandon Riss, PE Road Design Engineer

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

PERFORMANCE OF LOUISIANA S CHIP SEAL AND MICRO-SURFACING PROJECTS

ATTACHMENT 50-1: PERFORMANCE AND MEASUREMENT TABLE

Public Notice ISSUED: 10/20/2014 EXPIRES: 11/03/2014

PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Manual Section. Introduction 1. Using This Manual 2-3. Administrative Actions 4-6. Road and Bridge Project Types 7

Private Roads Maintenance Workshop

Public Notice ISSUED: 16 February 2018 EXPIRES: 19 March 2018

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

SHRP2 Renewal Project R23 PAVEMENT RENEWAL SOLUTIONS

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Attachment C Applicant s Proposed Mitigation Statement Alaska DOT&PF Northern Region Pilot Station Airport Relocation Project POA

Concrete Pavement: Concrete Pavement Basics. Basic Components of a Concrete Pavement. Concrete Pavement Types. Jointed Plain

Traffic Technical Memorandum: Hickman Road over Tuolumne River Bridge Replacement Project, Stanislaus County (BRLO-5938(199))

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Contents. Tables. Federal Aid Condition Maps

Year Pre Total County Debt (Bonds & BANS) Mitigation Fees

Public Notice ISSUED: 18 December 2015 EXPIRES: 04 January 2016

FEDERAL AID ROAD CONDITION REPORT FOR BRANCH COUNTY 2018

Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating. Manual RATING RATING RATING PASER RATING. Concrete Roads

Pavement Rehabilitation Options in Indiana. Dave Holtz Tommy E. Nantung Lisa Egler-Kellems Indiana Department of Transportation

Wetland Impact Assessment & Two Part Finding Form

Oklahoma Department of Transportation Environmental Programs Division Office Fax

TRANSVERSE CRACKING PROGRESSION IN ASPHALT SHOULDERS ADJACENT TO CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

Pavement Management Systems

Puerto Rico. Pavement Preservation Conference and Technology Implementation. US. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

Effective Pavement Management: Understanding the Health and Needs of your Roads

State Highway 10A Improvements (from the SH-10 junction extending 6.18 miles east to the SH-100 junction, Muskogee and Sequoyah Counties, Oklahoma)

Public Notice ISSUED: 22 October 2018 EXPIRES: 21 November 2018

STRUCTURAL EVALUATION & TREATMENT SELECTION FOR LOCAL ROADS. Nick Jones Local Technical Assistance Program Utah State University

ROAD CONDITION REPORT KALAMAZOO COUNTY MAY Prepared by the Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study (269)

PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.

Transportation Asset Management Program 2017 Federal Aid PASER Road Survey. January 2018

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTER OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Using Pavement Management Data to Determine Asphalt Pavement Performance Cycles

CHAPTER B TABLE OF CONTENTS

Micro-Surface Premature Distress SH 19 Hopkins County, Paris District

ROAD CONDITION REPORT KALAMAZOO COUNTY

603 - ASPHALT PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS SECTION 603 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Public Notice ISSUED: August 11, 2015 EXPIRES: September 10, 2015

Rehabilitation Recommendations for FM 97 in Gonzales County

Public Notice ISSUED: 5/6/2014 EXPIRES: 6/5/2014

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No T-01 January 19, 2011

Highway Construction Program

Alligator Cracking. Light. Medium. High

Cultural Exchange Program between Egypt and Bulgaria Fayoum University

Asphalt Pavement Forensics: Understanding the Problem to Better Determine the Solution

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Regulatory Program: Emergency Stream Restoration

Flexible Pavement of Ohio

Public Notice ISSUED: August 7, 2013 EXPIRES: September 6, 2013

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

Township of McNab/Braeside Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Goshen Road

2010 Midwestern Pavement Preservation Partnership Conference

EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT (ERCAR) SAMPLE OUTLINE

Overview. Preventive Maintenance Concepts. What are thin and ultra thin mixes. Experience in Michigan with ultra thin

Information for File # JTF

How to Select the Appropriate Pavement Rehabilitation Option. David Rettner, PE American Engineering Testing, Inc.

Public Notice ISSUED: November 7, 2018 EXPIRES: December 7, 2018

Design of rural and urban roads contributes a lot towards safety of users. Identify some low-cost

Public Notice ISSUED: 17 April 2018 EXPIRES: 17 May 2018

21 PAVEMENTS General Administrative Requirements Standards Personnel Certification

Transcription:

Information for File # MVP-2015-00132-SJW Applicant: Eau Claire County Highway Department Corps Contact: Samuel Woboril Address: 1314 Contractors Blvd, Plover, Wisconsin 54467 E-Mail: samuel.j.woboril@usace.army.mil Phone: (651) 290-5878 Primary County: Eau Claire Project Location: The project site is located in Sec. 6, T. 26N., R. 7W., and Sections 19, 30, and 31, T. 27N., R. 7W., Eau Claire County, Wisconsin. (See attached project location map). Information Complete On: January 22, 2015 Posting Expires On: February 25, 2015 Authorization Type: LOP-06-WI This application is being reviewed in accordance with the practices for documenting Corps jurisdiction under Sections 9 & 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act identified in Regulatory Guidance Letter 07-01. We have made a preliminary determination that the aquatic resources that would be impacted by the proposed project are regulated by the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Our jurisdictional review and final jurisdictional determination could result in modifications to the scope of the project s regulated waterbody/wetland impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements identified above. An approved jurisdictional determination will be made prior to reaching a permit decision, and will be posted on the St. Paul District web page at http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/. Project Description: The Eau Claire County Highway Department proposes to reconstruct a 2.04 mile section of CTH K. The project would consist of pulverizing and relaying the existing pavement structure and paving a new asphaltic surface. In addition to the rehabilitation work, the asphaltic shoulder would be widened throughout the project corridor from 3 to 4-feet to meet current design standards and would be given a safety edge. Multiple substandard vertical curves would be realigned to meet current design standards, and drainage structures would be replaced throughout the project length. Permanent signing, pavement marking, and beam guards would also be replaced as part of this project. The existing pavement structure exhibits signs of fatigue and pavement distress including rutting, transverse cracking, and alligator cracking contributing to a poor pavement condition. In addition, numerous sections of CTH K have been patched and are breaking apart providing a rough ride for vehicular traffic. There are a few culvert pipes under the CTH K roadway that will also need to be replaced. The purpose of this project would be to improve substandard roadway conditions and geometry while improving vehicular travel safety along this portion of CTH K. 1

Impacts to Waters of the U.S. The proposed project would result in the discharge of fill material into 1.23 acres of fresh (wet) meadow and 0.51 acres of sedge meadow wetlands. Alternatives Considered The following alternatives were explored: Alternative 1 - Do Nothing: This alternative does not address the inadequate shoulder width, steep side slopes, substandard geometry, rough ride, or deteriorated pavement structure. The crash rate is high on this corridor and safety improvements need to be made. If improvements are not made to rehabilitate the existing pavement structure the pavement will continue to deteriorate leading to a total reconstruct. This alternative would not meet the project purpose and need of the proposed project and is not the preferred alternative. Alternative 2 - Pavement Replacement using 3R standards (Match Existing): This alternative proposes overlaying the existing pavement structure, widening the asphaltic shoulder, paving a smooth driving surface, replacing drainage structures, new permanent signing, and new pavement marking. This alternative does not address the substandard vertical geometry found within the project corridor. This alternative would not meet current design standards. The new surface would last approximately 10-12 years which would result in the need for the roadway to be repaved in the near future; therefore, this alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and is not the preferred alternative. Alternative 3 Pavement Rehabilitation using 3R standards (No Improvements): This alternative proposes rehabilitating the existing pavement structure, widening the asphaltic shoulder and flattening side slopes to current design standards, paving a smooth driving surface, replacing drainage structures, new permanent signing, and new pavement marking. This alternative does not address the substandard vertical geometry located throughout the project corridor. This alternative is an improvement over alternatives 1 and 2, however it still does not meet the desirable design standards. This alternative is not preferred. Alternative 4 Pavement Replacement using 3R standards (Vertical Curve Adjustment): This alternative proposes rehabilitating the existing pavement structure, widening the asphaltic shoulder and flattening side slopes to current design standards, paving a smooth driving surface, replacing drainage structures, new permanent signing, and new pavement marking. This alternative proposes realignment of the substandard vertical curves to 55 mph (meets 3RC1 design standards). This alternative proposes use of 3:1 side slopes outside of the clear zone to minimize impacts to wetlands. Overall this alternative meets the purpose and need by rehabilitating/reconstructing CTH K and improving safety throughout the project corridor. This alternative meets design standards for the 3RC1 design class, and is the applicants preferred and recommended alternative. Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species According to the USFWS Midwest Region website, which was checked on January 22, 2015, the Gray wolf (endangered), the Northern long-eared bat (proposed as endangered), the Sheepnose (endangered), and the Karner blue butterfly (endangered) are found in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin. 2

Historic Properties A search of the Wisconsin Historical Society Database was conducted on January 22, 2015, and no historic properties were found within or in close proximity to the project location. Mitigation At the time of this public notice the applicant has not provided a final compensatory mitigation plan to offset the wetland impacts that would occur as a result of this project. However, the applicant has stated that they are currently exploring the availability of mitigation credits from a Corps approved private commercial mitigation bank located within the corresponding bank service area of the project. The applicant s final mitigation proposal would be required to satisfy the 2008 Mitigation Rule and the Guidelines for Wetland Compensatory Mitigation in Wisconsin. Drawings See attached MVP-2015-00132-SJW, Page 1 of 26 through Page 26 of 26 3

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 1 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 2 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 3 of 26

MVP-2014-00132-SJW Page 4 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 5 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 6 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 7 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 8 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 9 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 10 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 11 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 12 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 13 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 14 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 15 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 16 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 17 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 18 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 19 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 20 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 21 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 22 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 23 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 24 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 25 of 26

MVP-2015-00132-SJW Page 26 of 26