ÆÕ 65. Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report Æÿ Monitoring Sites. MWMO Watershed Bulletin: Lake Levels Lake Water Quality

Similar documents
2016 Monitoring Report; Mississippi River Tributaries

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Boy Lake CASS COUNTY

Ploof s Creek South. Johannes Creek. Grand Lake, Ploof s Creek South, Johannes Creek. Introduction

Understanding Lake Data

Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient TMDL

Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization 2012 Water Monitoring Report

Gull Lake CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES

Portage Lake Hubbard County

Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization 2013 Water Monitoring Report

Sand Lake ( ) Carnelian - Marine - St. Croix Watershed District

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed

2016 Summit Lake Water Quality Report Prepared by Thurston County Environmental Health Division

Annual Monitoring Report 2016

Lake Washington. Water Quality Assessment Report. Copyright 2012 PLM Lake & Land Management Corp.

Final TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Appendix A. General Concepts in Lake Water Quality. Black Dog WMO Watershed Management Plan P:\23\19\513\plan\Black Dog WMO adopted plan.

Hadlock Pond, Washington Co., Lake Hadlock Association, Inc.

Sunrise River. Watershed Management Organization. East Bethel Ham Lake Linwood - Columbus

Chapter 2: Sunrise River Watershed

Appendix D Monitoring Program

Pebble Lake - Water Quality Report

Interpreting Lake Data

Chlorophyll Training. If you registered for Chlorophyll-- - get your equipment NOW from Jean (out in the hall) before the training starts.

Interpreting Lake Data

National Lakes Assessment 2012

2007 Inland and Purdy Reservoirs Report. Rivers and Reservoirs Monitoring Program

Impacts to Aquatic Habitats from Land-Use or Is It Polluted?

Hubbard County Water Quality and You Celebrating 20 Years of Water Quality Testing in Hubbard County!

Prepared by: Capitol Region Watershed District and Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. DRAFT Como Lake TMDL. February 22, water ecology community

Acidity and Alkalinity:

11. Public Utilities. Key Terminology: OVERVIEW STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMISSIONS. Inventory and Analysis

VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION Sustainable Lake Management Plan Charley Lake, Ramsey County, MN

Bethel - East Bethel Ham Lake Nowthen - Oak Grove St. Francis

Welcome. Thank you for joining us!

Twin Lake. Lake Status Report. Prepared for Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. April 2007

Platte Lake CROW WING & MORRISON COUNTIES

Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority. Canyon Lake Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan

There is no organized lake association for Clearwater (Round) Lake at this time. Transparency data Good data set from , 2015.

LAKE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1998 Lake Frances and Lake Tustin

The following discussion and recommendations are based on our examination of 2010 monitoring results.

Byllesby Reservoir Phosphorus TMDL Public Meeting & Open House May 13, 2013 Phillippo Scout Reservation

City of Stillwater Lake Management Plans. Lily Lake McKusick Lake. Wenck File # Prepared for:

Balsam Lake Water Quality Study

Water Quality Analysis of Eutrophication for Lake Needwood, Montgomery County, MD

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017

Water Quality Assessments of Select Lakes within the Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed

DECISION DOCUMENT FOR THE WIRTH LAKE PHOSPHORUS TMDL, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN

Lake Hubert CROW WING COUNTY

WALTON COUNTY COASTAL DUNE LAKES WATER CHEMISTRY SUMMARY 2016

Typo Lake and Martin Lake TMDL

BROWN S CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 2009 WATER MONITORING REPORT

Please join us to learn the results of the project!!

Little Pine Lake DNR ID:

Utah Lake Watch Report Utah State University Water Quality Extension. Prepared by:

Chapter 3. Lake Assessments

Environmental Services

Section III. Aitkin County Large Lakes

Section III. Aitkin County Large Lakes

Draft: Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL

Wirth Lake Excess Nutrients Total Maximum Daily Load Report

Lake Magda Nutrient TMDL FINAL

Okabena-Ocheda-Bella Clean Water Partnership Diagnostic Study

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION. Lake Augusta Alum Treatment Lower Mississippi Watershed Management Org. COMMENT:

HORSESHOE LAKE WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT

Wakefield Lake TMDL Public Meeting 3/17/2014. Jen Koehler, PE Barr Engineering

Sunrise River. Watershed Management Organization. East Bethel Ham Lake Linwood - Columbus

Lower Hay Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Reference Lake and Trend Monitoring Summary for Isanti County, Minnesota

Evaluation of Water Quality in. Sylvia Heaton Water Bureau, MDNRE

Walker Brook Lake CLEARWATER COUNTY

Upper Hay Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Otter Lake Otter Lake Association Town of Forestport Oneida County

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

Potter Lake. University of Kansas Lawrence Campus, Douglas County, Kansas. Water Quality Evaluation January 13, 2014

Lake Monitoring Results for Gorman, Rice, Sabre, Shields, Lower Sakatah, Upper Sakatah, and Tetonka Lakes, Cannon River Watershed Partnership, 2007

Clearwater Lake CLEARWATER / BELTRAMI COUNTY

Phosphorus Goal Setting Process Questions and Answers 2010

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Lake Elsinore Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Prairie Lake OTTER TAIL COUNTY

U.S. Geological Survey s Update on the Water Quality of Delavan Lake

Movil Lake BELTRAMI COUNTY

Lower Cullen Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Burnt Shanty Lake ITASCA COUNTY

Spring Lake Upper Prior Lake Nutrient TMDL

Envirothon Aquatics. Mike Archer, NE Dept. of Environmental Quality. Katie Pekarek, Nebraska Extension Jeff Blaser, Nebraska Game and Parks

Draft Lake Winona TMDL Phase 1 Report Data Summary and Modeling Strategy

Smithville Lake 2000 Water Quality Report

3B IMPAIRED WATERS AND TMDL APPROACH

8 LITTLE CROSBY LAKE RESULTS

(Must be a county, city, township, watershed district, watershed management organization or joint powers organization.)

Placid Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Beltrami County Lake Protection Summary Report

TMDL Implementation Plan

2016 WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROMPTON RESERVOIR PROMPTON, PENNSYLVANIA

2017 Data Report for Arbutus Lake, Grand Traverse County

Blackduck Lake BELTRAMI COUNTY

A Study of Eutrophication Phenomenon of a Lake of a Modern City of India

Transcription:

Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 "S Mississippi River æº 2013 Monitoring Sites æº Lake Levels Lake Water Quality ÆÕ 65 Sullivan Lake æº Æÿ65 MWMO Watershed Bulletin: 2014-4 ÆÕ 65

Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 Prepared by: Kari Oquist, Water Resources Specialist, Mississippi Watershed Management Organization and Andrew Dotseth, Water Resource Technician, Anoka Conservation District Completion Date: March 2014 Suggested citation: Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. 2014. Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013. MWMO Watershed Bulletin 2014-4. 8 pp. 1224 Marshall Street NE, Suite 201 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413-0136 (612) 465-8780 (612) 465 8785 fax www.mwmo.org

Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 MWMO Watershed Bulletin: 2014-4

Abstract In 2013, the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) contracted the Anoka Conservation District (ACD) to conduct monitoring activities on Sullivan Lake, located in Columbia Heights. Sullivan Lake, also known as Sandy Lake, had been monitored historically, but water quality had not been monitored since 2005. A volunteer, in coordination with ACD, conducted weekly water level monitoring in lakes during 2013 between March 2 and November 7. The average water elevation for 2013 was 880.0 feet. Sullivan Lake water elevations fluctuated frequently, routinely bouncing by 0.5 feet in response to rainfall. ACD conducted water quality monitoring on Sullivan Lake once each month from May to September. Conductivity, ph, turbidity, salinity, dissolved oxygen (D.O.), temperature, and secchi transparency were measured in the field while samples were collected for laboratory analysis of total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and chloride. Water quality results indicated that during 2013 Sullivan Lake had poor water quality compared to other lakes in this region (NCHF Ecoregion), receiving an overall D grade. This was similar to the previous twelve monitored years. The lake was highly eutrophic, and phosphorus levels were two to three times the threshold for an impaired designation by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. ACD staff s subjective observations were that algae levels were high or severe and the lake was unsuitable for swimming during the entire period from May through September. A trend analysis for the past thirteen years of monitoring data indicated that there has been a significant decrease in Sullivan Lake s water quality. 1224 Marshall Street NE, Suite 201 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413-0136 (612) 465-8780 (612) 465 8785 fax www.mwmo.org

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Sullivan Lake Monitoring... 1 Methodology... 1 Sample Collection, Handling and Preservation... 1 Laboratory Analyses... 2 Data analysis... 2 Water Elevation Monitoring... 3 Water Quality Monitoring Results... 5 Results Summary... 5 Trend Analysis... 7 Recommendations... 8 List of Tables Table 1. Sullivan Lake water elevation statistics from 2008 through 2013... 4 Table 2. 2013 Sullivan Lake water quality data... 5 Table 3. Metropolitan Council s lake quality grading system... 6 Table 4. Sullivan Lake historic water quality conditions from 1993 through 2005 and 2013... 7 List of Figures Figure 1. Sullivan Lake water elevation during 2013... 3 Figure 2. Sullivan Lake water elevation from April 1999 to November 2013... 4 Figure 3. Sullivan Lake phosphorus (ug/l), chlorophyll-a (ug/l), and secchi depth (ft) during 2013... 6 Figure 4. Sullivan Lake trophic state... 6 Figure 5. Sullivan Lake historic summertime means of total phosphorus (ug/l), chlorophyll-a (ug/l), and secchi depth (ft)... 7 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 i

ii Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013

Introduction The Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO) has monitored water quantity and water quality in the Mississippi River since 2003 and in the stormwater drainage system since 2005. In 2012, the MWMO boundaries expanded to include portions of the Cities of Fridley and Columbia Heights and the City of Hilltop. The MWMO discovered that Sullivan Lake, in Columbia Heights, had been historically monitored for water level, chlorophyll-a, and total phosphorus; however, the chemical parameters had not been monitored for several years. The MWMO contracted the Anoka Conservation District (ACD) to conduct water level and water quality monitoring during 2013, to gain an understanding of current lake conditions. Sullivan Lake Monitoring Sullivan Lake, also known as Sandy Lake, is located in south central Anoka County. It has a surface area of 16.8 acres and a maximum depth of 9 feet (2.7 m). A walking trail system/park circumscribes the lake. Adjacent to the trail is a mix of residential, commercial, and retail uses. The walking trail around the lake is used extensively, but the lake itself is used very little for swimming, fishing, or boating because there are few places with clear access to the water. Sullivan Lake s watershed is highly urbanized, and the lake essentially serves as a flow-through stormwater pond. It is connected directly to the stormwater drainage system. Water exiting this lake is discharged to the Mississippi River via stormwater conveyances. Methodology Sample Collection, Handling and Preservation Sullivan Lake was sampled once each month from May to September. Sampling was conducted by boat at the deepest part of the lake (2.7 meters), which was located using a portable depth finder or global positioning system (GPS). Conductivity, ph, turbidity, salinity, dissolved oxygen (D.O.), and temperature were measured using a Hydolab Quanta multi-probe at a depth of one meter below the water surface. Water samples were collected with a Kemmerer sampler at a depth of one meter below the water surface, to be analyzed by an independent laboratory for chlorophyll-a, chloride, and total phosphorus. Sample bottles were provided by the laboratory. Total phosphorus sample bottles contained the preservative sulfuric acid (H2SO4), while bottles for chloride and chlorophyll-a did not require preservative. Chlorophyll-a sample bottles were wrapped in aluminum foil to exclude light. Water samples were kept on ice and delivered to the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. Transparency was measured using a Secchi disk. The disk was lowered over the shaded side of the boat until it disappeared and then pulled up to the point where it reappeared again. The midpoint between these two depths was the Secchi disk measurement. Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 1

Laboratory Analyses Chemical analysis was performed by Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories (MVTL). The following methods were used at the laboratory: Chlorophyll APAH 10200-H method. Reporting limit of 1 mg/m 3 Total Phosphorous-EPA 365.1 method. Reporting limit of 5 ug/l Chloride-APHA 4500-CL-(E) method. Reporting limit 3 mg/l Data analysis To evaluate Sullivan Lake s current condition, sampling results were compared to historical readings and other lakes in the region. Comparisons to other lakes are based on the Metropolitan Council s lake quality grading system and the Carlson s Trophic State Index for the North Central Hardwood Forest ecoregion. Historical data can be obtained from the U.S. EPA s national water quality database, EQuIS, via the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The Metropolitan Council developed the lake water quality report card in 1989. A lake receives a letter grade that is based on average summertime (May-September) chlorophyll-a, total phosphorus, and Secchi depth. In the same way that a teacher would grade students on a curve, the lake grading system compares each lake only to other lakes in the region. Thus, a lake that gets an A in the Twin Cities Metro might only get a C in northern Minnesota. The goal of this grading system is to provide a single, easily understandable description of lake water quality. Carlson s Trophic State Index is a number used to describe a lake s stage of eutrophication (nutrient level, amount of algae). The index ranges from oligotrophic (clear, nutrient poor lakes) to hypereutrophic (green, nutrient overloaded lakes). The index values generally range between 0 and 100 with increasing values indicating more eutrophic conditions. Unlike the lake letter grading system, the Carlson s Trophic State Index does not compare lakes only within the same ecoregion; it is a scale used worldwide. There are four trophic state index values: one each for phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and transparency, plus an overall trophic state index value that is a composite of the others. The indices are abbreviated as follows: TSIP-Trophic State Index for Phosphorus TSIC-Trophic State Index for the inorganic part of algae, Chlorophyll-a TSIS-Trophic State Index for Secchi transparency TSI-Overall Trophic State Index At the conclusion of each monitoring season, the summertime (May to September) average for each trophic state index is calculated. Because of inherent natural variation, lake water quality is not the same each year. Sorting out this natural variation from true trends is best accomplished with statistical tests that analyze the data objectively. When at least 5 years of monitoring data have been collected, ACD staff test for lake trends using a Multivariate Analysis of 2 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013

Elevation (ft) Variance (MANOVA). MANOVA tests the vector response of correlated response variables (Secchi depth, total phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a) while maintaining the probability of making a type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis) at p=0.05. In other words, the three most important measurements of lake water quality are tested simultaneously. Testing each response variable separately would increase the chance of making a type I error. Water Elevation Monitoring A volunteer, in coordination with ACD, conducted weekly water level monitoring in lakes during 2013 between March 2 and November 7. A staff gauge is located on the west side of the lake near the outflow. It is surveyed each year by ACD and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) using datum NGVD 29 in feet. 2013 water elevation data, as well as all additional historic data, are available on the Minnesota DNR website using the LakeFinder feature at www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/index.html. The lake ID for Sullivan (Sandy) Lake is 02-0080. Lake water elevation was measured 27 times during 2013. Sullivan Lake water elevations fluctuated frequently, routinely bouncing by 0.5 feet in response to rainfall. Sullivan Lake water elevations fluctuate dramatically because it receives a large amount of stormwater relative to its size and its outlet releases water in all but the lowest water conditions. Water elevation data for 2013 are shown in Figure 1. Historic water elevation data recorded since 1999 are shown in Figure 2. The Ordinary High Water Level (OHW), the elevation below which a DNR permit is needed to perform work, is 880.60 feet. Table 1 shows the average water elevation for 2008 through 2013. 881.5 881 880.5 880 879.5 879 878.5 878 Date Figure 1. Sullivan Lake water elevation during 2013 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 3

882.50 882.00 881.50 881.00 880.50 Elevation (ft) 880.00 879.50 879.00 878.50 878.00 877.50 877.00 Date Figure 2. Sullivan Lake water elevation from April 1999 to November 2013 Table 1. Sullivan Lake water elevation statistics from 2008 through 2013 Year Average Minimum Maximum 2008 880.22 879.42 881.24 2009 879.92 879.36 880.52 2010 880.23 879.62 881.10 2011 880.36 879.29 881.25 2012 879.86 878.91 881.15 2013 880.00 879.23 880.93 4 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013

Water Quality Monitoring Results Results Summary The ACD monitored water quality in Sullivan Lake monthly from May to September 2013. ACD monitored the following parameters: total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, chloride, secchi transparency, D.O., turbidity, temperature, conductivity, ph, and salinity. Water quality monitoring data for 2013 are shown in Table 2. Figure 3 illustrates 2013 total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and transparency data. In 2013 Sullivan Lake had poor water quality compared to other lakes in this region (NCHF Ecoregion), receiving an overall D grade (Table 3). This was similar to the previous twelve monitored years. The lake was highly eutrophic (Figure 4), and phosphorus levels were two to three times the threshold for an impaired designation by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. ACD staff s subjective observations were that algae levels were high or severe and the lake was unsuitable for swimming during the entire period from May through September. Past depth profiles indicate that dissolved oxygen is too low for most fish (<4 mg/l) below four feet, and is too low for most aquatic life (<1 mg/l) near the bottom. This is likely due to oxygen consumption by decomposition of expired algae. Table 2. 2013 Sullivan Lake water quality data Parameter Units Recording 5/15/13 6/12/13 7/10/13 8/7/13 9/5/13 Average Min Max Limit ph 0.1 8.31 7.33 8.66 9.30 9.15 8.55 7.33 9.30 Conductivity ms/cm 0.01 0.886 0.604 0.356 0.331 0.385 0.512 0.331 0.886 Turbidity NTU 1 10 10 13 44.7 74.90 30 10 75 D.O. mg/l 0.01 12.9 5.06 10.72 12.56 12.95 10.83 5.06 12.95 D.O. % 1 130 53 143 138 155 124 53 155 Temperature C 0.1 16.6 18.2 28.4 22.7 24.0 21.98 16.60 28.41 Temperature F 0.1 61.9 64.7 83.1 72.8 75.2 71.6 32.0 83.1 Salinity % 0.01 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 Chloride mg/l 0.1 372.0 197.0 94.5 89.4 103.0 171.2 89.4 372.0 Chlorophyll-a ug/l 0.5 16 17 27 136 125 64.0 15.5 136.0 Total P mg/l 0.010 0.066 0.136 0.130 0.194 0.232 0.152 0.066 0.232 Total P ug/l 10 66 136 130 194 232 152 0 232 Secchi ft 0.1 3.7 3.6 2.3 1.6 1.0 2.4 1.0 3.7 Secchi m 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.0 1.1 Physical 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.00 3.2 2.0 4.0 Recreational 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 2.00 3.2 2.0 4.0 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 5

TP and Cl-a (µg/l) 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 2013 Phosphorus, Chlorophyll-a, and Transparency 5/15/13 6/12/13 7/10/13 8/7/13 9/5/13 Cl-a T.P. Secchi 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Secchi Depth (ft) Figure 3. Sullivan Lake total phosphorus (ug/l), chlorophyll-a (ug/l), and secchi depth (ft) during 2013 Table 3. Metropolitan Council s lake quality grading system Grade Percentile TP (ug/l) Chlorophyll-a (ug/l) Secchi Depth (m) A <10 <23 <10 >3.0 B 10 30 23 32 10 20 2.2 3.0 C 30 70 32 68 20 48 1.2 2.2 D 70 90 68 152 48 77 0.7 1.2 F >90 >152 >77 <0.7 Carlson s Trophic State Index Figure 4. Sullivan Lake trophic state 6 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013

Trend Analysis Thirteen years of water quality data in total have been collected by the Metropolitan Council (1993-2003) and Anoka Conservation District (2004, 2005, & 2013). Historical summertime means of total phosphorous, chlorophyll-a, and transparency from 1993 to 2013 are shown in Figure 5. Historical summertime means and lake grade data are shown in Table 4. Water quality is showing a significant, downward trend (repeated measures MANOVA with response variables TP, Cl-a, and Secchi depth (F 2,10=8.21, p=0.0078). We examined each of the response variables separately to gain insight into which might be responsible for the trend. Both phosphorus and chlorophyll-a have been increasing over time. TP Cl-a Secchi (ft) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TP and Cl-a (µg/l) 2010 2011 2012 2013 Secchi Depth (ft) Year Figure 5. Sullivan Lake historic summertime means of total phosphorus (ug/l), chlorophyll-a (ug/l), and secchi depth (ft) Table 4. Sullivan Lake historic water quality conditions from 1993 through 2005 and 2013 Agency MC MC MC MC MC MC MC MC MC MC ACD ACD ACD Year 93 94 95 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2013 Sullivan Lake Historic Summertime Mean Values TP 106.0 79.1 114.0 84.2 115.5 94.4 110.0 110.0 92.4 143.4 102.3 129 151.6 Cl-a 31.4 27.2 29.4 35.3 66.8 47.3 53.8 55.2 87.2 70.3 52.6 56.3 64.0 Secchi (m) 0.80 0.60 0.80 0.70 0.55 0.71 0.69 0.70 0.50 0.50 0.80 0.40 0.7 Secchi (ft) 2.6 2.0 2.6 2.3 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.6 1.6 2.6 1.3 2.4 Carlson's Tropic State Indices TSIP 71 67 72 68 73 70 72 72 69 76 71 74 77 TSIC 65 63 64 66 72 69 70 70 75 72 70 70 72 TSIS 63 67 63 65 69 65 65 65 70 70 63 73 64 TSI 66 66 67 66 71 68 69 69 71 73 68 73 71 Sullivan Lake Water Quality Report Card TP D D D D D D D D D D D D D Cl-a C C C C D C D D F D D D D Secchi D F D D F D D D F F D F D Overall D D D D D D D D F D D D D Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013 7

Recommendations Sullivan Lake may have poor water quality because of the composition of the stormwater that it receives. ACD recommends investigating the stormwater quality draining to Sullivan Lake. Stormwater from urbanized areas may be high in sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants. Improvements to the stormwater drainage system that could benefit Sullivan Lake should be explored. 8 Sullivan Lake Monitoring Report 2013