EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION

Effective market analysis carried out by national regulatory authorities under EU directives

Session 3: Competition Policy and European Regulation

Flowchart 1: Historical Example

Undue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly

RECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/710/EU)

Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location

Public Hearing. MTC Presentation as per Public Notice Nº62, 20 March Miguel Geraldes 11 May 2012

Part I PRELIMINARY. Part II MARKET DEFINITION ASSESSING SIGNIFICANT MARKET POWER. Part IV IMPOSITION OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location

Price regulation of unbundled broadband services

Principles of implementation and best practice regarding the application of Retail Minus pricing methodologies IRG (05) 39

PURC Roundtable Tallahassee, Florida 29 September Real Competition and Real Regulation Lessons from Europe

A GUIDELINE FOR CONDUCTING MARKET REVIEWS

Margin squeeze: defining a reasonably efficient operator*

Embedding Regulation in an Industrial Policy Framework for Emerging Countries

NOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of (Text with EEA relevance)

REPUBLIC OF IRAQ COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA COMMISSION

New approach to regulation of fixed and mobile networks

SIGNIFICANT MARKET POWER REGULATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXPLANATORY NOTE. Accompanying document to the

How to regulate next-generation access (if at all)?

Session 6: Market Analysis tools and cases

Market power and market definition in electronic communications

Retail Bundling in Hull. KCOM Bundling of SMP and non-smp Products

Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential and nonresidential

Competition Guidelines. Guidelines issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority

SESSION 4: STRATEGIC COSTING FOR BROADBAND SERVICES

BEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/ :

The analysis of Price Distortions is strictly related to the principle of non discrimination and equal treatment

Draft Call Termination Regulations Explanatory Note. 05 September 2014

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

The EU electronic communications framework: is it on track?

SUMMARY NOTIFICATION FORM: RETAIL INTERNET ACCESS MARKET AND RELEVANT

The Role of the Regulator in Respect of Encouraging Consumer Choice, Affordable & Quality Services, Encouraging Investment etc.

ERG (09) 21. ERG Report on price consistency in upstream broadband markets

BoR (11) 20 final. BEREC monitoring report on Broadband Common Positions

Subnational market approach

REGULATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE. Format: Classroom. Duration: 4 Days

The FTTH Council is concerned by a number of specific aspects of this consultation which it would like to set out at the outset.

International Conference: Regulating the Electronic Communications Market, 26 September 27 September 2016, Budva, Montenegro

Session 2: Competition Policy Fundamentals

Defining Relevant Markets and Assessing Market Power

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The new Universal service and Users rights Directive

experience Principal, International Ofcom April 2008

Oligopolies in electronic communications: more concentration, more regulation?

COMISIÓN DEL MERCADO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES

Undue discrimination by SMP providers Consideration of responses to a proposal for investigating potential contraventions on competition grounds of

Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Michaelides,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. accompanying the COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

POLICY GUIDELINES ON TARIFFS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

Regulating oligopolies in telecoms: the new European Commission guidelines

BEREC Report on Oligopoly analysis and regulation. Questions to stakeholders

Telecoms: how the Article 7 consultation and notification mechanism works: frequently asked questions (see also IP/10/644)

BT views on the future of Trade and a Digital Trade Policy

Aditya Bhattacharjea Delhi School of Economics

Review of the 2002 SMP Guidelines. Anthony Whelan WIK workshop Revising the SMP Guidelines 27 March 2018

Wholesale Broadband Access Markets

EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS

Review of fixed call origination and termination markets Call for inputs

Tutor2u Economics Essay Plans Summer 2002

AIIP comments on the

Economic Foundation. Dr. Christoph Stork. Monday, 2 July 12

The CMT s approach to margin squeeze in bundled offers

BEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case ES/2013/1466

POST- OG FJARSKIPTASTOFNUN. Market analysis

Table of Contents. About the Author. xvii. List of Tables N. List of Figures. List of Abbreviations. Preface... xxix.

BEREC views on Article 74 of the draft Code Co-investment and very high-capacity (VHC) networks

ETNO comments on the ERG draft common position on geographic aspects of market analysis

ABUSE OF DOMINANCE. John Pheasant Lecture to National Law University, Jodhpur 24 January 2014

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

Do we need ex ante price regulation in a liberalised postal market?

The Future of EU Access and Interconnection Regulation

A FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN SERVICES REFERENCE PAPER

BoR (12) 40. BEREC Report of the Consultation on the draft BEREC report on Co-investment and SMP in NGA networks

Review of the fixed narrowband services wholesale markets Statement on the markets, market power determinations and remedies including further

Mergers in the energy sector. Xavier Vives IESE Business School

Telecom Italia response to Draft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services BoR (10) November 2010

Case SI/2009/0957: Wholesale (physical) network infrastructure access (including shared or fully unbundled access) at a fixed location

MARGIN SQUEEZE IN THE U.S. AND THE EU: WHY THEY DIFFER?

Strategic and Retail Market Review. 3 June 2008

Liberalization, Investment, and Regulation: The Key Factors for the Development of the Electronic Communications Market

Margin Squeeze / Refusal to deal. Valérie MEUNIER Service économique Autorité de la concurrence

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2017/1960

Regulation. (Courcoubetis & Weber: Chapter 13) + ICT Regulation Toolkit: Aalto University Comnet.

COURSE DESCRIPTION REGULATION IN MODERN TELECOMS. Format: Classroom. Duration: 2 Days

Strategic and Retail Market Review. 28 February 2008

Regulating Public Utility Performance The Law of Market Structure, Pricing and Jurisdiction Scott Hempling

BoR (14) 73. BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies)

WORLD TRADE GATS/SC/31/Suppl.3 11 April 1997 ORGANIZATION

Response to the consultation on the Draft review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies).

Merger Review in the United States and the European Union. Jeffrey I. Shinder Constantine & Partners

BoR (11) 34. BEREC Report Regulatory Accounting in Practice 2011

Latham & Watkins Communications Group. The New Regulatory Package: More Competition in the European Telecom Markets

Mobile call termination market review

COMISION DEL MERCADO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES

Transcription:

EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS Banjul 19-23 August, 2013 David Rogerson, ITU Expert International Telecommunication Union 1

Session 2: Understanding the place of cost accounting and cost modelling in the regulatory process International Telecommunication Union 2

Agenda What are the aims and objectives for: Regulation in general Regulation of markets Price regulation Costbased regulation 3

The general aims and objectives of regulation International Telecommunication Union 4

5

Regulation is designed to protect the long-term interests of consumers where the market is unlikely to be able to do so. Regulation has always been needed but its nature has changed over time Regulation of Monopoly Regulation of Competition 6

Why was monopoly found wanting? (1) High control and transaction costs Tried to do things government is not good at doing operational Inefficiency Conflicting public sector and budget priorities, leading to under-capitalisation Risk aversion v. risk management Political interference v. business values 7

Why was monopoly found wanting? (2) Monopolies tend to: Restrict output Increase prices Internalise surplus (to shareholders or other stakeholders) Have weakened incentives to deliver required services With growing and diversified demand, monopoly could not deliver 8

Liberalisation and de-regulation Liberalisation is the opening of markets to new competitors De-regulation is the removal of regulation, but: Initial liberalisation accompanied by more (transitional) regulation What was implicit needs to be explicit New field of regulation is the area competitive safeguards that is, fair competition Competition is not effective in all areas of the telecommunications market 9

The balance between competition and regulation Competition When competition is effective and sustainable Tests Competitors are established Limited barriers to entry and exit Market relatively mature No collusion Regulation When there are bottlenecks in the market, When an operator has substantial power in the market Summary: when there is likely market failure, underlined by the existence of significant market power in one or more participants 10

Changes in regulation with liberalisation Still concerned with long term interests of end users Regulation of competition and competitive protections to ensure that new entrants are not squeezed out of the market by the incumbent New entrants must have access at reasonable (cost reflective) prices to bottleneck services and facilities which cannot be duplicated or which it is uneconomic to duplicate. 11

The regulation of markets International Telecommunication Union 12

13

Regulation should be restricted to markets where there is a reasonable expectation of market failure. Regulation come in three stages Identification of the market Determination of dominance Establishment of remedies 14

Why is it important to identify markets? Effectively competitive markets should not be regulated. Competition ensures appropriate social and economic outcomes Regulation should be reserved for where there is market failure Cannot determine where a market has failed without defining the relevant market The existence of dominance (Significant Market Power) is associated with market failure. Cannot determine whether there is SMP in a market without defining the relevant market. 15

The proper sequence of regulation Should we regulate? Depends on Is there market failure? Depends on Who has SMP? What is the market? 16

Adopting general competition principles There is no special way to define markets in telecommunications. The approaches of competition law relevant to the economy as a whole need to be applied. Note, however, that because of common network platforms and systems many service markets in telecommunications may be inter-related. This adds a level of complexity to the analysis, but does not mean that a different approach altogether is required. 17

The limits of substitution Markets are arenas in which the providers of goods and services seek to exchange with customers. They may compete with others for the customers choice in the course of doing so. Markets are defined in terms of the limits in which substitution occurs and that is substitution in terms of supply and demand. If a customer may move from one supplier to another, the suppliers are in the same market. If a customer may move from one service to another, those services are in the same market. Markets are therefore typically defined in terms of both geography and product (goods and services) 18

The hypothetical monopolist test The standard approach to defining the extent of a market (e.g. EC and US DoJ and FTC) Start with the narrowest possible definition of a market (e.g. call termination on a single network) Assume that a hypothetical monopolist in that market imposes a small but significant non-transitory increase in price ( SSNIP ) Ask whether consumers are likely to respond by considering alternative products from other entities. If yes, the market definition must be extended to include that potentially substitute product. 19

General Approach 1 Definition of relevant markets susceptible to ex ante regulation Definition of relevant markets Demonstration of susceptibility to ex ante regulation 2 Market analysis Analysis of effectiveness of competition & designation of operators with SMP 3 Remedies selection Identification of potential competition problems related to SMP Selection of remedies to address potential competition problems 20

Different approaches to retail and wholesale markets Markets should only be regulated, if there are substantial and persistent entry barriers insufficient or ineffective competition competition law not effective These cumulative criteria may be fulfilled on both retail and wholesale markets, but. Regulation in upstream wholesale markets may create competition in downstream end-user markets E.g. access to towers and easements might enable competition in mobile services in an area 21

2007 European Commission Recommendation Mobile: Fixed broadband : Fixed narrowband: Leased lines: Retail: Retail mobile services Retail broadband access Retail narrowband access Retail telephony services Retail leased lines Wholesale: Mobile access and call origination Wholesale broadband access Transit Wholesale call origination Wholesale trunk segments Wholesale voice call termination Wholesale physical network infrastructure access, incl. ULL Wholesale call termination Wholesale terminating segments Relevant markets susceptible to ex ante regulation listed in Recommendation 22

The regulation of prices International Telecommunication Union 23

24

Prices are affected by many factors not all of which are under the enterprise s control Internal pricing factors Overhead and set up costs Material costs Production costs Distribution costs Equipment replacement Marketing and sales Profit requirement External pricing factors Demand elasticity Competitors Economic cycle and demand strength Opportunities to charge above cost Price discrimination Risks 25

Prices are designed for profit maximisation Price and Cost Profit = (P C)* V Does (P1-C1)*V1 > (P2-C2)*V2? P1 P2 C1 C2 V1 V2 Volume 26

Regulators have different pricing goals (1) Social pricing may be in order (e.g. affordability, universality) But costs and profits need also to be taken into account (e.g. regulated rate of return) 27

Regulators have different pricing goals (2) Efficiency of investment: This implies that opportunity costs are taken into consideration, i.e. investment costs and usual rates of return on capital employed. Efficiency of resource use: The price for an additional unit must not be lower than the marginal costs (i.e. costs for an additional unit). Efficiency of market entry: The entry of efficient firms should be encouraged and the entry of inefficient firms should be prevented. Practicability: It must be possible to apply the system to determine conditions for interconnection in practice. Data has to be available, transparent and reproducible. 28

Recommendations for price controls if you are a regulator Concentrate on wholesale price controls as far as possible Avoid price controls if you can don t regulate if the market is competitive Not all prices need detailed costing (e.g. retail-minus pricing may be appropriate, e.g. wholesale leased lines) Recognise that operators have to be able to cover their costs plus a reasonable return on capital employed (profit) otherwise the arrangements are not sustainable Recognise that the deployment of new technologies requires access to new resources/funds to undertake the relevant investment, and the risks involved need to be taken into account when prices are set. Goal: find a simulated market price in other words try to mimic the prices that a competitive market would produce 29

Cost-based price regulation International Telecommunication Union 30

31

Competition remedies The commonly-used remedies for wholesale markets can be broadly categorised as: access obligations (including interconnection and unbundling) transparency obligations non-discrimination obligations separation (including accounting and other reporting requirements) price controls and cost accounting Some further retail remedies may also be applied if wholesale remedies on their own are insufficient: They include price caps and price controls to prevent predatory pricing, price discrimination and unreasonable bundling 32

Principles to guide the selection of remedies Remedies shall be based on the nature of the problem identified, proportionate and justified in light of the objectives laid down Article 8(4) of the EC Access Directive Appropriate the choice of remedy should be based on the nature of the identified problem Reasonable the remedy should be explained and justified through the publication of a reasoned decision Proportionate the least burdensome remedy (or combination of remedies) should be applied 33

When to regulate for cost-based prices The imposition of cost-based prices should be seen as the remedy of last resort The remedy is appropriate to resolves cases of: Cross-subsidisation Predatory pricing Excessive costs Price discrimination Cost models should only be constructed if there is a reasonable chance they will be needed to resolve such problems 34

Cost accounting and accounting separation Can be used to ensure: there is an appropriate allocation of costs between the SMP operator s wholesale and retail divisions the cost of wholesale inputs are based on relevant production costs a vertically integrated operator is not engaging in an unfair cross-subsidisation or a price squeeze. Often also used to support the administration of price controls and cost accounting obligations 35

Cost-based prices (and cost models) Can be used to address the risk of excessive pricing or price squeezes occurring within a particular market Such remedies can range from weaker obligations (e.g. an obligation that prices are reasonable ) to strong obligations (e.g. an obligation that prices are cost oriented or cost based) Cost based or cost-oriented price controls typically require some form of cost model to be built and for service costs to be estimated (although international benchmarking is also sometimes applied as an interim or alternative measure) 36

When selecting remedies, ask yourself... What is the competition problem that is anticipated? What is the nature of that problem? (e.g. is it at the wholesale or the retail level? Is it a pricing issue or an access issue?) Which broad category of remedy might address the problem? Within that category, which specific remedies might address the problem? Can the onerousness of this remedy be reduced without detracting from its effectiveness? Would that specific remedy in itself be sufficient to address the problem? If not, what additional remedies are necessary? Can the onerousness of this combination of remedies be reduced without detracting from its effectiveness? 37