Tools for Greenhouse Gas Analysis: Exploring Methodologies for Development Finance. July 14, 2009

Similar documents
Canadian Hydropower and the Clean Power Plan

EPA Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Discussion Draft: The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 Executive Summary April 20, 2009

Introduction and Methodology

CRS Report for Congress

EPA ISSUES FINAL GREENHOUSE GAS MONITORING

Xcel Energy Inc. - Climate Change 2018

METHODOLOGIES AND TOOLS FOR GLOBAL CONSISTENCY OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ESTIMATION AND REPORTING FOR THE OIL & GAS INDUSTRY SECTOR

Agriculture and Carbon Offsets Policy

Non-State and Subnational Action Guidance

Understanding Greenhouse Gases

Business Goals and Inventory Design

U.S. Emissions

THE CZECH FIRST CCS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: HOW TO MANAGE THE COST?

POLICY BRIEF. The Lieberman-Warner America's Climate Security Act: A Preliminary Assessment of Potential Economic Impacts

The Role of Waste-to-Energy in a Renewable and Carbon-Conscious Environment

Colorado s Greenhouse Gas Inventory

U.S. Submission on methodologies and systems used to measure and track climate finance

California s Revised Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation

EU Approach to Modelling the Impacts of Response Measures. Pre-sessional experts meeting 23 November, 2005 Montréal

Climate Change Policy and Public Engagement in California

Overview of EPA Analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 H.R in the 111 th Congress

An Introduction to Offsets

Australia s emissions and the economy

Carbon Trading an overview of financial instruments designed to combat climate change

The Need for Carbon Offsets

Recent Developments in GHG and Climate Change Management. April 15, 2010

Greenhouse Gases and Mandatory Reporting December 11, 2008 Judy B. Yorke, P.E., C.P.P.

Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors Info Sheet

Cap and Trade & Complementary Climate Policies in California: AB32 and Beyond

Climate Change Policy and Economics: Implications and Opportunities for Agriculture. KSU Extension Conference Global Climate Change Session

Greenhouse Gas. Emissions Report. December 2011

Growth in the Industrial Pellet Sector An Opportunity for New US Demand for Pellets

Overview of U.S. and European Climate Change Programs. Reid Harvey, U.S. EPA Presented at LSU Energy Summit October 24, 2007

Understanding Carbon Offsets. Presented to California Green Summit. March 16, 2010

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

U.S. Regional Approaches to Energy Policy and CO 2 Mitigation

Fundamentals of Policy. Matt Clouse U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Renewable Energy Markets Conference September 16, 2009

Congress, Congressional Research Service, , R41836, The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Lessons Learned and Issues for Congress.

Current status of energy transition and low carbon developments in Japan

Analysis of the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act of 2015 (S. 1548)

Impacts of Announced Nuclear Retirements in Ohio and Pennsylvania

CHE 670 Sustainability

Fossil Fuel Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Japan s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fiscal Year 2016 (Final Figures 1 ) <Executive Summary>

Seventh Biennial Report on Progress toward Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals

Table 1- Residential CO2eq Baseline Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley

An Industry Perspective on Canada s s Climate Change Program

China s New National Carbon Market

Water-Energy-Carbon Nexus and Your Membrane Plant

Analysis of the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act

Carbon emissions (2000)

Environmental Product Declaration of Electricity from Torness Nuclear Power Station. Summary of Results. A study for British Energy undertaken by

Modeling Climate Change Policies in the U. S. and Canada: Preliminary Results

Corporate Emissions Assessment Protocol

NOx GHG. SOx. RECs. clean development mechanism. compliance. carbon credits

Monitoring and Verification Plan Graneros Plant Fuel Switching Project June Prepared by

Carbon Finance at the World Bank. The World Bank March 2007

2015 Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Qualifying Energy Efficiency Projects in Market-Based Carbon Offset Programs: A Case Study

Table TSD-A.1 Source categories included under Section 202 Section 202 Source IPCC Sector IPCC Source Category Greenhouse Gases

Project Gleneagle Emissions Software for Harmonized Reductions of Greenhouse Gases and Criteria Air Pollutants

Impact of Australia s Greenhouse Gas mitigation Policies on Competitiveness and Trade

Clean Power Plan. The Effect on Pennsylvania s Energy Outlook. Joshua Carey, Michael Spiessbach, and Pj Tatano

Renewable energy (RE) is any energy source that naturally replenishes and cannot be exhausted. Renewable energies include:

GHG Protocol Mitigation Goals Standard. Yamide Dagnet, WRI

PJM Perspective of the EPA Clean Power Plan: Analysis

Greenhouse Gas Reductions from Demand-Side Management

OVERVIEW AND RESULTS. Figure 1: Embodied emissions in the OUS supply chain versus other GHG inventory emissions sources. DRAFT VERSION Sept.

Chapter 7 Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Climate Commitments and Conundrums: Introduction to the Kyoto Protocol

Selected Findings from Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis Conducted To Date. August 6, 2015

Methane and California s Livestock Operations. Rachel Tornek, Policy Director California Methane Symposium, Los Angeles March 12, 2015

Current Topics at EIA

Background. Recent Findings on Climate Change

Transforming Energy Systems, Reducing Emissions And Creating Jobs

Carbon Management 101

DIRECTING THE STRATEGIES OF THE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION SECTOR IN ROMANIA BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE INTEGRATED ANALYSIS - ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL

Session SBI45 (2016)

Economic and Social Council

Absolute GHG Accounting Approach for Financed Emissions. FMO Technical Paper 2 October 2018

Climate Change and Carbon Trading

Clark University on Track for Carbon Reduction and Carbon Neutrality Goals

The Role of Carbon Pricing Policies in Contributing to Stabilization of Agricultural CO 2 Emissions in North America: Emphasis on Agriculture

Profiting from Cap and Trade. Peter Veiga Regional Municipality of Durham

Transitioning to Low Carbon

2007 UW-Stevens Point Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Taking Stock 2018: Technical Appendix

Overview of AB 32, Cap and Trade Program

Cap-and-Trade & Climate Policy

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

EMISSION REDUCTIONS UNDER THE AMERICAN CLEAN ENERGY AND SECURITY ACT OF 2009

Emission Portfolio Standards

An Analysis of the Carbon Limits and Energy for America s Renewal (CLEAR) Act and Comparison to Waxman-Markey

Economic and Energy Market Implications of the Clean Power Plan

Health Impacts of Coal-Fired Power Plants. Reuben Andrew Muni Climate and Energy Campaigner Greenpeace Southeast Asia Philippines

Electricity Technology in a Carbon-Constrained Future

Coal with Carbon Capture & Storage in an Era of Rising Energy Demand and Regulation of CO 2

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOME FORECASTING METHODOLOGIES FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS

Reporting GHG Emissions

Summary of the Harvested Wood Products Workshop Rotorua, New Zealand, February Justin Ford-Robertson and Angela Duignan

Transcription:

Tools for Greenhouse Gas Analysis: Exploring Methodologies for Development Finance July 14, 2009

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION (OPIC) An Agency of the United States Government

History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC Address by President Clinton at the UN Special Session on Environment & Development June 1997. Track and report, on an aggregate basis, the annual greenhouse gas emissions from OPICsupported power sector projects. FY1998 and FY1999 aggregate reporting of 100% of emissions calculated using mass balance methodology which assumed an installed capacity factor of 100%. CO 2 emissions in (U.S. short) tons.

History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC Climate Change: Assessing Our Actions (2000) A review of the cumulative annual greenhouse gas emissions and climate implications of all OPIC finance and political risk insurance projects supported since 1990. Calculated cumulative emissions for power sector projects as of 2000 and projected cumulative emissions in 2015. Assumed all power plants operate for 25 years. Assumed that direct emissions from oil, gas and industrial projects were de minimis when compared to the power sector emissions. In 2000 30% of OPICs portfolio exposure was in the power sector.

History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC Climate Change: Assessing Our Actions (2000) In 2000 the cumulative emissions from 52 power plants (16,775 MW) represented 0.24% of global emissions. In 2015 the cumulative emissions were projected to represent 0.43% of global emissions. Based on 25 year life-of-plant and 85% operating capacity factor (hours). Did not disaggregate calculations just generic mass balance algorithm and default values for certain parameters (heat rates by generating technology, emission factors by fuel types). Conclusion: Cumulative annual GHG emissions from OPICsupported projects do not substantially contribute to global GHG emissions and associated climate change impacts.

History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC Friends of the Earth, Inc., Greenpeace, Inc. and the City of Boulder, Colorado v. Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the Export-Import Bank of the United States providing loans, insurance and other assistance for fossil fuel projects including extraction projects (oil and gas fields) and transportation projects (pipelines), processing and refining facilities and power plants. will result in the annual emissions of billions of tons of greenhouse gases (primarily carbon dioxide) emissions equivalent to almost two-thirds of U.S. annual domestic carbon dioxide emissions.

Percentage of Portfolio History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC OPIC Fuel Mix vs US Domestic Fuel Mix for Electric Generation 60 52 50 40 48 30 20 16.5 15 21 30.2 1990-2002 US, 2001 10 5.3 4 9 0 Coal Oil Fuel Type Gas 0 Nuclear Renew able US, 2001 1990-2002

History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC Difference in Accounting Methods Comparison of annual U.S. emissions to OPIC s 25 year cumulative emissions. Count the emissions from the combustion of all the petroleum, natural gas and coal produced by extractive industry projects and fuel transported via pipeline referred to as indirect emissions. Count all lifetime emissions for privatizations. Count emissions from committed projects that never move to financial close.

History of Carbon Accounting at OPIC Lessons Learned Annual emissions reporting is less problematic than cumulative emissions reporting. The term indirect emissions can mean different things to different people. A clear distinction must be drawn between committed and active projects. Proof-read settlement agreements carefully with respect to the use of U.S. short tons and metric tonnes.

OPIC Climate Change Policy Goal: reduce the direct greenhouse gas emissions associated with projects in OPIC s active portfolio by 30% over a ten-year period (2008-2018). Baseline Inventory Operational Boundary is defined as 100% of the direct, on-site emissions from all projects in OPIC s active portfolio as of June 30, 2008. Baseline inventory includes all projects in the energy, oil and gas, transportation, mining, manufacturing and construction sectors that are of sufficient size to potentially emit more than 100,000 U.S. short tons/year. Projects in the finance/banking, insurance, and service sectors were not included in baseline because the majority of emissions from these sectors are attributed to electricity use, which was defined as outside of the scope of the baseline.

OPIC Climate Change Policy Used independent auditor (Pace Global Energy Services LLC) to develop the baseline inventory. Used 2007 operating data to calculate baseline. Power plant accounting estimates based on operating capacity of 8000 hours/year, fuel consumption data (if available), facility operating capacity and/or more specific data provided by investors. Where fuel consumption data was not available used IFC s conversion efficiency factor and other standard assumptions sourced from the Climate Registry s General Reporting Protocol. Non-power accounting estimates based on operating capacity of 8000 hours/year and throughput and fuel consumption data. Where estimates from similar facilities were relied on data was obtained from credible, public information sources such as API, USEPA or the Energy Information Administration. Standard assumptions were sourced from the General Reporting Protocol.

OPIC Climate Change Policy Final Baseline Number 50,452,986 US short tons which equals the 48,050,463 tons auditor estimate plus 5% to account for active projects that emit less than 100,000 tons/year. Now quantifying emission estimates from all projects with the potential to emit greater than 25,000 tons year to be consistent with the recent draft GHG reporting rule proposed by USEPA. Baseline and disaggregated accounting calculations published in OPIC s Annual Policy Report to the U.S. Congress (April 2009).

OPIC Climate Change Policy Constraining New Carbon Annual Cap 3 million tons/year, although OPIC may further reduce this. Allocation based on strategic importance in foreign policy and developmental benefit context. Extension of insurance or finance term treated at new commitment. Projects involving renewable energy and clean technology assigned a value of zero. Since July 2007 have added 787,000 tons to the portfolio. 32 projects have not moved forward in part because of the cap constraint.

OPIC Climate Change Policy Other Elements Consider only those coal-fired power plants that capture and sequester 85 % of greenhouse gas emissions. All projects estimated to emit greater than 100,000 tons/year automatically Category A. Decline support for projects that cannot meet energy efficiency benchmarks.