Data Collection Site Information

Similar documents
FORM B: DAMMING AND DIVERSION OF WATER

Application for resource consent Form B Damming and diversion of water

SNIFFER with ICE: a taster of barrier assessment issues

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Culverts

Dam Safety Surveillance. Templates for very low, low consequence category dams

Appendix 6 Weir Assessments

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Fords

Riverine obstacles to fish movement: a rapid assessment tool

Irrigation Crossing Structures

ONE DIMENSIONAL DAM BREAK FLOOD ANALYSIS FOR KAMENG HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT, INDIA

Created by Simpo PDF Creator Pro (unregistered version) Asst.Prof.Dr. Jaafar S. Maatooq

Concurrent Sessions D: Design and Performance of Roughened Channels - Rock Weir Fish Passage Challenges

Designing roads for fish, floods and foxes

Guidance for developers of run-of-river hydropower schemes

Council CNL (15)43. Maintaining and improving river connectivity: the current position and experience in England

Fishways: Restoring Coastal Aquatic Connectivity. Matt Moore

An Overview Of The New German Fishway Standard For Upstream Fish Passage

Challenges to Restoring Watershed-Scale Ecological Connectivity Within Major Great Lakes Watersheds

These potential changes and their implications are outlined in Annex 1.

R I Freshwater Wetlands Buffer Zones

Use of WARSSS in Stream Restoration and Watershed Planning. Michigan Aquatic Restoration Conference 2015

Types of Inspections. Prior to Inspection. Types of Inspections. Typical Inspection Equipment. Embankment Dams

Appendix E: Bridge Site Information Summary

CCR Rule Annual Inspection Report 2

Follow this and additional works at:

Scoring Road Stream Crossings as Part of the North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative (NAACC)

Proposed Norwegian classification limits according to morphological modification of surface water bodies

10(a) Bridge and culvert design information

LOW WATER CROSSINGS, fords, or drifts, as they

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

The largest European fish pass in Geesthacht Design and construction Dipl.-Ing. Christof Neumann

Improving the River Petteril Online Story Map featuring a case study in catchment management

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Types of Inspections

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Geneva Dam. Design of a Steep, Temporary, Riprap Ramp

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

iv) Alberta fish weirs

Buffer Zones. November 29, RIDEM Freshwater Wetlands

Hackensack River Flood Reduction Study Update

Fish Passage Planning and Design

(b) Discuss in brief shaft spillway with neat sketches. Marks 04. OR Q (2) Explain in brief USBR stilling basin. Marks 08

Standard Operating Procedure for Critical Riffle Analysis for Fish Passage in California

Fish Passage Design for Roughened Channels. Pre-Presentation Note

SURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR ROADS. Components of Surface Drainage System

Irrigation Structures 1

Strategies to Mitigate Scour Critical Structures

SEV field sheets V10.3 October 2013 Stream Ecological Valuation (SEV) field sheets Site description. Current weather conditions(tick) Clear/sunny

Amherst. University of Massachusetts - Amherst. Michael Forty Durham University; Ribble Rivers Trust,

What's stopping the water? Identifying influences on environmental water releases in the Wimmera

Travers Reservoir Rehabilitation Project Irrigation Technical Conference Lethbridge, AB June 2, 2010

Irrigation Structures 2. Dr. M. R. Kabir

Bridge Planning Updates. Bridge Planning Practitioners Workshop April 2012

STUDY 7.0 FISH PASSAGE

Natural flood management guidance:

PA of NY&NJ - TETERBORO AIRPORT RUNWAY 6-24 Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) UNSTEADY-STATE FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS

Fish Passage Culvert Inspection (FPCI)

CASE STUDY OKUYOSHINO, JAPAN

Asst.Prof.Dr. Jaafar S. Maatooq. 1 st Semester HYDRAULIC STRUCTUER, KINDS & FUNCTIONS 1 of 26

Form 1: Application for resource consent

A FEASIBILITY STUDY INTO THE USE OF AN ARCHEMEDIAN SCREW TURBINE FOR HYDROELETRIC GENERATION AT TEDDINGTON WEIR, LONDON. 1 st JULY 2009.

MILL CREEK FISH PASSAGE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FINAL REPORT

Town of Aurora Stream Management Master Plan PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE May 1 st, 2018

Get the Rock Out: Engineered wood structures for stream restoration. Joe Berg, Doug Streaker, Matt Koozer and Kevin Nunnery Biohabitats, Inc.

Unique ID: (from PFRA database) Location: Newport, Co. Tipperary. Stage 1: Desktop Review

Chapter 4. Main problems in a canal network 4.1 INTRODUCTION

Initial OPW Designation APSR AFRR IRR Co-ordinates Easting: Northing: PFRA database comments (in italics):


General Construction

Outlet Structure Modeling

ATV CROSSINGS ATV TRAIL-STREAM CROSSINGS

Comparison between 2D and 3D Hydraulic Modelling Approaches for Simulation of Vertical Slot Fishways

STEM Project: It s All Water Under the Dam

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits March 26, 2019

Design Concept of the facilities to. space. Kamoto Minoru Chief Researcher

TEACHING HYDRAULIC DESIGN IN AN AUSTRALIAN UNDERGRADUATE CIVIL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM

Flood Hazard Assessment Report Falls Gulch, Larimer County, Colorado January 16, 2013

Turbidity Changes During Culvert to Bridge Upgrades at Carmen Creek, Idaho

Considerations In Estimating Tailwater Elevations

A2 Summary of changes between 1st and 2nd RBMP (i) FSC2, (ii) Fish Barrier Tool

Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study PLAN FORMULATION ADDENDUM

APPLICATION FORM AF-50: CONSENT UNDER SECTION 50, ARTERIAL DRAINAGE ACT, 1945

Pont and Blyth Investigation. Small Burn - to confluence with River Pont. Dates - 16/01/12

Appendix C, Attachment 4 June 11, Diversion Channel Outlet Hydraulic Modeling RAS and ADH

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Flow Control No Channel Flow Dry Channels Erosion Control Low Channel Flows Shallow Water Sediment Control High Channel Flows [1] Deep Water [2]

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

6-5 Analysis of water storage state by the subsurface dam

Case Study 19. Mill Creek Embedded Box Culvert Vented Ford

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits May 2, 2017

Civil Engineering Department. 2 Marks Question and Answer. CE:2301:Irrigation Engineering

ENNS Catchment area. Upper Austria. Lower Austria. S t yria. Inn. Linz. Erlau. Ybb. Enns. Traun. Age. Enns

Good Practice Guide. Technical Guidance: Flood risk activity exemptions Date Published: April GPG 221 Document Owner: Flood Risk Strategy

Design and Construction Practices for the Kenyon Mill Step-Pool Nature-like Fishway, Pawcatuck River, Rhode Island

Open Channel Flow. Ch 10 Young, Handouts

Modeling and Simulation of Irrigation Canals with Hydro Turbines

Unique ID: (from PFRA database) Location: Clonfert, Co. Galway. Stage 1: Desktop Review

Improving Fishway Design Through the Use of Detailed 2D and 3D Hydrodynamic Modelling

Transcription:

Data Collection Site Information Assessors names Date of assessment Name of site Catchment National grid reference At least 8 figures e.g. SD 1234 5678. Proximity to tidal limit (km) If a tidal barrier, indications of tidal state (Ebb/Flood/Slack Water) For example, rising or falling tailwater levels (water level downstream of structure) during assessment period. Time of assessment Please be as accurate as possible as this information could be used later to determine the tidal state. Is weir overtopped at high tide? Owner and purpose of structure (if known) How is structure accessed Photographs (Number of and reference) 11

Consider whether there are any environmental conditions that may affect the results of the day s assessment. For example, if it is not possible to survey during normal flow conditions for eel migration, record this here and how it might affect the assessment. Plan of site Structure Description Type of man-made structure Tick all applicable options. Weir Dam Culvert Sluice Ford Tidal Flap Bridge Footing Structure material Tick all applicable options. Concrete Wood Rock Metal Other Include a description here. 12

Estimates of dimensions (Estimate by eye from the bankside) Width of channel immediately downstream of structure (metres) Width of structure (metres) Total wetted width (areas of water) at crest of structure (metres) Depth of water over crest of structure (metres) Head loss (difference in upstream to downstream water level) (metres) Assessment of Structure for Upstream Migration Section 1 This flow chart is designed so that the least limiting transversal section of a structure (across the river s width) is assessed but that the most limiting features on the longitudinal section of a structure (downstream to upstream) are assessed. This assumes that where multiple structures exist across a river s width (i.e. fixed crest weir next to sluice gate), eels migrating upstream would utilise the easiest path where possible. However, if a lip at the crest or step at the toe of a weir slope is encountered i.e. the slope does not meet the upstream and/or downstream water level because of another impediment, then this needs to be accounted for in the assessment as it presents a greater challenge for eels. Are there multiple structures across the width of the river i.e. bank to bank? Is there a slope that meets downstream water level? Go to Section 2 Assess this part of the structure in Section 2 Is there a step? Assess this part of the structure in Section 2 Is there a gate? Assess this part of the structure in Section 2 What are the multiple structures? List below. Assess each structure type in turn in Section 2, and choose the highest scoring structure for your overall barrier assessment score 13

Section 2 Please circle the score for the most appropriate answer to each question Is there a continous path of crawling media over the structure? Crawling media is a wetted rough substrate (such as algae, moss, other vegetation, roughened rock, decaying wood, etc.) that eels can climb or crawl across. This crawling media must be uninterrupted across the structures length (downstream to upstream). Image source: Chris Gardner, South East Rivers Trust. 3 0 If yes, assume barrier is passable to elver What is the approximate slope of the structure? <1 in 4 1 in 4 1 in 1 >1 in 1 Variable e.g. stepped, lip at crest or step at toe 1 in 4 1 in 1 1 in 0 4 2 1 1 Stepped Lip at Crest Step at toe Example of stepped structure What is the approximate length of the slope? This applies to the slope across the whole structure, downstream to upstream. If it is stepped, count the number of steps and record as a note here: 0-2m >2-6m >6-9m 10m 4 3 2 1 14

What is the approximate velocity over the slope? If using the float method Very low (<0.5m/sec) Low (0.5m-1m/sec) Medium (>1m-2m/sec) High (>2m/sec) If using the pacing method Slow walk Walking Jogging Running 4 2 1 0 Where is velocity recorded from? Is the structure assumed to be passable to elver, yes or no? What is the total passability score? Score Range 10-15 Unlikely to represent a major barrier to upstream migration 05-09 Partial impact, obstacle may impede passage <05 Likely to be a complete obstacle to eels migrating upstream Escapement Potential Passability Assessment for Downstream Migration Are there are any features of the structure that would obstruct downstream migration, such as pumps or mechanical features that could cause physical harm to eels? Does the flowing water fall onto a hard or rocky bed that could inflict physical damage on the eels and impede further downstream migration? 15