SECOND Quarter REPORT

Similar documents
FOURTH Quarter REPORT

STRATEGIC UPDATE. P R E S E N T E D B Y : Paula Gold-Williams President & CEO February 18, 2019 I n f o r m a t i o n a l U p d a t e

Energy Policy 2012 Annual Update

Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington Electric System Customers, Energy Sales, and Peak Demand Year Ended December 31,

MARIN CLEAN ENERGY. introducing. MCE How It Started 1/24/2011. Community Choice Aggregation. Policy. Grassroots. Public Surveys*

Making the Case for Energy Efficiency Policy Support: Results from the EPA / DOE Energy Efficiency Benefits Calculator

CITY OF ALBANY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT. Discussion of Community Choice Aggregation and Recommendation to Join the Marin Energy Authority

Financial Services. SAWS Overview. Dan Crowley Director - Financial Planning. Rate Advisory Committee 8 January Our water. Our future.

ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

Department of Water and Power City of Los Angeles. Los Angeles 2 nd Regional Investors Conference February 26-27, 2014

Comprehensive Cost of Service and Rate Design Study

Rate Design and Resource Planning

State Bar of Texas General Fund Financial Highlights For the Year Ending May 31, 2012 (PREPARED FROM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION)

Energy Policy 2013 Annual Update

House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 8, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

CCA Terms Glossary. Valley Clean Energy Alliance. i CCA Terms Glossary

WATER & POWER RATES REQUEST, Energy and Environment Committee March 1, 2016

Benchmarking and Program Review. Distributed Energy Services

House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 15, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: FEBRUARY, 2019

SB 843 (WOLK) Community Based Renewable Energy Self Generation Program. Utility & Policy Maker Frequently Asked Questions

TESTIMONY SUPPORTING SB 209. Before the Committee on Utilities March 15, 2017

21,363 MW 22,774 MW ONTARIO ENERGY REPORT Q JULY SEPT 2014 ELECTRICITY. Electricity Highlights Third Quarter Ontario s Power Grid

Policies that Support New Nuclear Power Plant Development

State Bar of Texas General Fund Financial Highlights For the Year Ending November 30, 2012

CITY OF ST. HELENA AD HOC REVENUE SOURCE TASK FORCE WATER & WASTEWATER RATE STUDY MEETING 2

FORM 10-Q SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

BACKGROUND 1. Legal Basis Factual Basis

Review of Proposed Adjustments. Salt River Project s. Standard Electric Price Plans

PROJECT NO TX

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Service Center Policy

Costs and Benefits of Combined Heat and Power

AUDITING & CONSULTING SERVICES 2012 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Internal Audit Report #

Illinois Energy Policy

This analysis was prepared by Matt Gurnham under the direction of Peter Harrison and Jeffrey Novak.

Briefing for Candidates for the Pedernales Electric Cooperative Board of Directors

GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: MARCH, 2019

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Customer Energy Efficiency Solutions

How to qualitatively assess indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment

AUDITING & CONSULTING SERVICES 2013 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Internal Audit Report #

Vectren Corporation 2014 Integrated Resource Plan

AGA Financial Forum Business Update. May 17-19, 2015

CCA is a public-private mix

Marin Clean Energy Applicant Analysis for the County of Napa

EOS ECO-ENERGY INC. Recommendations: Energy Plan for New Brunswick Balancing the Environment, Economy and Social Aspects

Proposed Business Plan: CleanPowerSF Build-out of Local Renewable Energy Resources

REVENUE REQUIREMENT FOR DISTRIBUTION SERVICES

Self-Assessment of Organizational Readiness to Develop. 1. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Yes No Need to

OFFICE OF RETAIL MARKET DEVELOPMENT ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION 2015 ANNUAL REPORT

Referral # October 10, 2011

Energy Efficiency Accomplishments of Texas Investor-Owned Utilities Calendar Year 2012

Annual Operating Budget REVENUES

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Green Energy and Good Jobs Initiative Presentation for City Council

SAN ANTONIO WASTEWATER SYSTEM (SAWS) RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: MEETING 8

Frequently Asked Questions About Water and Wastewater Rates (FY )

Finding the Risk Hidden in Your Energy Contract: 10 Terms & Conditions You Need to Know

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Fourth Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. February 4, 2015

WRF Drought Webcast Series Financial Resiliency During Droughts

A Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism Proposal

William Murray Jr., P.E. Public Works Director Katie Victoria, MPA Sr. Administrative Analyst

Resource and Financial Impact of Clean Line P&E HVDC Delivered Wind Resources for TVA

Effectively Managing Energy Costs and Risk Over Time

Final Report Rate, Charge, and Cost of Service Study. For: Parker Water and Sanitation District. December 2014

FedEx Corp. Reports First Quarter Earnings Growth in Smaller Shippers at FedEx Ground and Outstanding Cost Management Benefit Quarter

Utilities Strategic Plan Strategic Objectives

2009 Power Smart Plan

Solar Photovoltaic Volumetric Incentive Program 2015 Report to the Legislative Assembly

Catalogue no X. Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution

PacifiCorp Renewable Portfolio Standard Oregon Implementation Plan 2011 through 2015

MCE A local, not-for-profit electricity provider

SB 838: Oregon Renewable Energy Act Establishing an Oregon Renewable Energy Standard

Marin Clean Energy A not-for-profit, community renewable energy provider

Understanding and Measuring School Electronics

CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT SUMMER RECAP

SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. Comprehensive Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Rate Study

LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER

Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario DECISION AND ORDER EB

FY19 OPERATIONAL PLAN

PWP 2015 IRP Update Energy Roadmap Event

S&W Seed Company Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements

Financial Report for the Month and Quarter ended. (unaudited)

American Sustainable Energy Council

DP&L Business Rebate Programs June 27, Lyle Garrison EE Program Manager

DOCUMENT TITLE. 2 5 EES Collection of Fixed Costs. 6 7 Policy 29 Energy Services Rate Design Rates & Tariffs Updated Schedule

Distributed Generation

UNDERTAKING J1.4. There are two other documents that are relevant to the referenced statement in the OPG Annual Report.

Ovo Energy Consolidated Segmental Statement

Measuring School Electronics Energy at Work 1

1 C. The Chief Executive Officer Affiliate Class of Services are 2 Provided at a Reasonable Cost

NCSL Utility Business Model Session

Fuel Diversity: Cornerstone of Reliable, Affordable and Environmentally Responsible Power

INTERIM RESULTS CEO/CHAIR SHAREHOLDER LETTER

Sample Energy Benchmarking Report

Question: Were customers with utilities affected? Or, more importantly, will they pay for January in the future?

Long Island Institute for Socio-Economic Policy

The Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board

Evaluating Costs of Energy Efficiency Programs

Electricity Supply. Monthly Energy Grid Output by Fuel Type (MWh)

Transcription:

SECOND Quarter REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015 www.austinenergy.com

BENEFITS OF PUBLIC POWER Austin Energy Regional Science Festival Austin Energy is the eighth largest publicly owned utility in the nation, and being a municipal utility means that the community has an active role in guiding and defining Austin Energy s policies. The public s priorities can be seen in all aspects of the utility, including energy efficiency programs, the progressive generation portfolio and customer care. The City of Austin and area residents also receive a direct benefit through the General Fund Transfer and other revenue transfers that are used to support other City departments and organizations. Just like the community it serves, Austin Energy places a significant emphasis on students education in science, technology, engineering and math commonly referred to as STEM. To highlight this priority, one of the utility s largest sponsored events is the 16th Annual Austin Energy Regional Science Festival. On Feb. 21, students from more than 200 area schools entered more than 2,000 science projects for the festival. Students from more than 50 Austin Independent School District campuses participated, as did students from other school districts including Leander and Round Rock Independent School District. Austin Energy staff, in partnership with the Austin Science Education Foundation, worked throughout the year to recruit schools, train teachers to help students with projects, recruit volunteers, secure sponsors and organize the festival. The event promotes STEM education to bolster the region s growing economy. This year, Canyon Ridge Middle School and Vista Ridge High School both from Leander ISD won sweepstakes awards by earning the most points in the 17 different science categories, and 117 students advanced to the Texas State Science and Engineering Fair in San Antonio. At the state fair, 23 Austin area students won awards. Because Austin Energy is a publicly owned utility, it is able to support its community by providing more than clean and reliable electricity. Gus Garcia Young Men s Leadership Academy participated in the 2015 science festival for the first time. CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM STATS Residential Customers Enrolled through Q2: > 45,659 Benefits Provided through Q2: > $4.8 M Weatherization Program Referrals through Q2: 26

AUSTIN ENERGY S AFFORDABILITY Because affordability is an important issue for both elected officials and Austin Energy, the publicly owned utility has goals to keep overall rate increases to no more than 2 percent per year and to have Austin Energy s rates remain in the lower 50 percent of rates in Texas. In 2013, for the first time in more than a decade, Austin Energy s rates came in above the state average, according to recently released data from the Energy Information Administration. Though Austin Energy has come in slightly higher than its metric, this type of comparison does not necessarily provide the full picture of Austin Energy s affordability and the value it brings to the community. Just looking at rates fails to show that Austin Energy customers realize a high level of affordability on their electric bills. When looking at residential pricing and usage, Austin Energy comes in below the state average. This contributes to keeping the average residential bill in the utility s service area among the lowest. Through the utility s tiered rate structure, education and energy efficiency programs, the utility is able to help customers lower their electric bills by decreasing their usage. This means customers can save money by using less power while still achieving the level of comfort they are looking for. Also, Austin Energy provides more service and value than many retail electric providers. These other providers set their rates according to forward projections, profitability and the market which is based on volatile natural gas pricing and do not include many of the community benefits seen through Austin Energy. Austin Energy s rates reflect community benefits including energy efficiency programs, low-income customer assistance, Austin 311 and discounts to school districts in its service territory. Austin Energy s rates also represent the utility s investments in a diversified energy portfolio including nuclear, coal, renewable and natural gas sources. This portfolio lends to more stable costs against the fluctuating market. This stability means that as natural gas prices rise, Austin Energy stays at a lower rate, but when prices lower quickly, Austin Energy s rates take more time to adjust to the change. Without this stability, though, customers would be subject to much more volatile pricing changes. Austin Energy s works to make sure customers receive the highest value for the money they spend. 2013 Monthly Average Residential Usage (kwh/customer) El Paso Electric Co. 625 kwh Austin Energy 918 kwh City of San Antonio Texas Average Bluebonnet Electric Coop, Inc. 1,157 kwh 1,177 kwh 1,273 kwh Perdenales Electric Coop 2013 Average Electricity Price by Customer Class (cents/kwh) 1,298 kwh Residential Commercial Industrial Total Austin Energy 11.09 10.03 6.88 9.66 Texas Average 11.35 8.02 6.36 8.98 Source: EIA Form 861. Industrial totals exclude REPs serving industrial customers only. 0 300 600 900 1200 1500

FINANCIAL RESULTS Q2 Ended Mar. 31, 2015 Austin Energy s preliminary, unaudited financial results for the second quarter of fiscal year 2015 ending March 31 are consistent with expectations. Non-power supply operating revenue grew since last year by $18 million, mainly due to increased regulatory revenue, which recovers transmission expense, and increased transmission service revenue due to an increase in usage and access fees. When compared with the prior fiscal year s second quarter, Austin Energy s preliminary results showed improvement, from a $28 million net loss to $4 million in this period. The following items were significant factors: Total operating revenue decreased $13 million mostly due to a reduction in power supply expenses offset by increased transmission, regulatory, and community benefit revenue. Non-power supply operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses were $2 million higher compared to prior year because of increases in transmission expenses, energy conservation rebates, and personnel and staffing costs offset by decreases in joint project costs. Power supply expenses were $190 million or $31 million lower than the same period last year primarily due to a decrease in market prices as well as a decrease in kilowatt-hour sales. Austin Energy s financial statements reflect assets and liabilities for under/over recovery of certain recoverable costs. Power supply costs are over recovered by $16 million compared to an under recovery of $13 million at March 31, 2014. Regulatory costs are $27 million under recovered at March 31, 2015, up from $10 million last year. Overall, Austin Energy s preliminary financial results show a $75 million increase in cash over the fiscal year that will aid in replenishing reserve levels and allow Austin Energy to invest in operational technologies and competitive generation resources. Power Supply Costs by Fuel Type/Source* Power Supply by Fuel Type/Source (MWh) Coal 20% 24% Coal 27% 52% Nuclear 7% Natural Gas 21% Natural Gas 11% Nuclear 38% * Costs include fuel for generation, fuel transportation, renewable power purchase agreements and hedging activity. 2300 2200 2100 2000 1900 Historical System Peak Demand MW 2,246 2,200 2,119 2,018 2012 2013 2014 2015 Renewable Percent of Load 19.6% Nonrenewables 80.4%

INCOME STATEMENT 6 months ended $ in millions 3/31/14 3/31/15* Operating Revenue $594 $ 581 Power Supply Expense 221 190 Non-Power Supply Expense 248 250 Depreciation Expense 75 75 Operating Income/(Loss) 50 66 Other Revenue (Expense) (25) (17) General Fund Transfer 53 53 Net Income/(Loss) ($28) ($4) Average Number of Customers 435,123 446,336 FY 2014, Q2 FY 2015, Q2 Total Sales in Gigawatt Hours 5,804 5,772 Debt to Equity Ratio 47% 46% Debt Service Coverage* 2.80 2.81 *Calculated using 12 month rolling income statement FY 2014, Q2 FY 2015, Q2 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION $ in millions 3/31/2014 3/31/2015* Variance Cash $124 $199 $75 Account Receivable (net) 133 126 (7) Power Supply Under Recovery 13 0 (13) Other Under Recoveries 14 32 18 Debt Service 41 24 (17) Strategic Reserve 107 107 0 Nuclear Decommissioning Reserve 195 203 8 Other Restricted Assets 107 116 9 Other Assets 440 442 2 Property, Plant, and Equipment 2,582 2,596 14 TOTAL ASSETS $3,756 $3,845 $89 Current Liabilities 102 107 5 Power Supply Over Recovery 0 16 16 Other Over Recoveries 11 16 5 Revenue Bonds 1,312 1,235 (77) Commercial Paper 106 196 90 Other Long-Term Liabilities 590 597 7 Retained Earnings 1,635 1,678 43 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY $3,756 $3,845 $89 *This information is unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the audited Comprehensive Financial Reports for the City of Austin, when published, on www.austintexas.gov/financeonline/finance/main.cfm