HSM APPLICATION USING IHSDM (I-12 TO BUSH) April Renard, P.E. LADOTD Highway Safety

Similar documents
The sections below include examples of HSM implementation activities undertaken by various transportation agencies.

Status of Highway Safety Manual Implementation. October 2015

An Introduction to the. Safety Manual

Data-Driven Safety Analysis (DDSA) Implementing Safety Innovations Every Day Counts 3

TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION. Using the Highway Safety Manual and the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. I 15 Dry Lakes Design Exception

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 21, 2009

A proposed performance-based highway design process: incorporating safety considerations

Evaluating Design Alternatives using Crash Prediction Methods from the Highway Safety Manual

New Analytical Tools for Safety Management of Urban and Suburban Arterials. Douglas W. Harwood Midwest Research Institute Kansas City, MO

FDOT D7 Local Agency Traffic Safety Academy September 21, FHWA - Kevin Burgess, Chimai Ngo, Esther Strawder, and Jim Thorne

Florida Department of Transportation District Four KICK-OFF MEETING. I-95 at Southern Boulevard (SR 80) Project Development and Environment Study

CHAPTER 3 SCOPE SUMMARY

PERFORMANCE BASED PRACTICAL DESIGN

Model Inventory of Roadway Elements (MIRE) GIS-T Annual Conference March 30, Robert Pollack FHWA

HIGH RISK RURAL ROADS (HRRR)

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Traffic Records Forum Biloxi, MS October 28,

1000 Performance Based Project Development (PBPD)

AASHTO s Highway Safety Manual and Performance Measures / Targets

Adaptation of HERS-ST Models for the South Carolina Interactive Interstate Management System

Highway Safety Analysis Tools for Engineers

Performance Based Practical Design. An FHWA Perspective

Highway Safety Manual Implementation. Priscilla Tobias, P.E. State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation

INTERACTIVE HIGHWAY SAFETY DESIGN MODEL (IHSDM)

RIDOT S Statewide Roadway and Asset Data Collection Project

MARTINSVILLE SOUTHERN CONNECTOR STUDY CITIZEN INFORMATION MEETING Magna Vista High School 701 Magna Vista School Road Ridgeway, Virginia May 8,

Eng. Benjamín Colucci-Ríos, PhD, PE, PTOE, FITE, API, JD

THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL

Highway Surveys and Location

HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL WORKSHOP

Public Meeting. US Highways 18 & 281 and SD Highway 50 From Douglas County Line to SD46 Charles Mix County

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects: Geometric Design. Tuesday, October 2, :00-3:30 PM ET

Performance Based Practical Design (PBPD)

Chapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.02 Structure Selection and Geometry. Introduction

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

Table of Contents Local Agency Guidelines Section B August 2011

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Roya Amjadi, FHWA, TFHRC Jim Sherwood, FHWA, TFHRC

100 Introduction Functional Classification Traffic Data Terrain & Locale Design & Legal Speed...

Section 3-01 General Concepts, Design Standards and Design Exceptions TABLE OF CONTENTS

NCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing

Performance Based Practical Design. March 30 th, 2016 ITS Georgia

100 Design Controls and Exceptions

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Geni Bahar, P.E. Describe key concepts and applications

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NON-NHS BRIDGE R&R POLICY

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Chapter 2 Transportation Element Goals, Objectives and Policies

Office of the Secretary PO Box Baton Rouge, LA ph: fx: October 2, 2014

ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES

Chester Bridge Environmental Assessment (EA) CAG Meeting #2. October 12, 2017

Role and Application of Accident Modification Factors (AMFs) within the Highway Design Process

Craig Fraser, P.E. Engineering Department. ITE Metropolitan Section of NY & NJ

NCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing

Table of Contents TOC. General Information. Street Classifications. Geometric Design Criteria

Urban Street Safety, Operation, and Reliability

U S H I G H W A Y 1 4 F I N A L E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T S T A T E M E N T ( F E I S

Process to Identify High Priority Corridors for Access Management Near Large Urban Areas in Iowa

Calibrating Crash Modification Factors for Wyoming-Specific Conditions: Application of the Highway Safety Manual - Part D

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS. Terrell Hughes, PE Conceptual Planning Manager VDOT Transportation and Mobility Planning Division

Tarbutton Road Interchange and I-20 Frontage Roads. Estimating and Planning Group

Chapter DESIGN EXCEPTION PROCESS

Shoulder Widening Prioritization Discussion

GUARDRAIL WARRANTS FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Manual Section. Introduction 1. Using This Manual 2-3. Administrative Actions 4-6. Road and Bridge Project Types 7

Access Management Action Plan Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

SafetyAnalyst: The Georgia Experience

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Highway Safety Manual

Figure 28 Ocean Drive Improvements and Middle Thorofare Bridge Replacement Alternatives Comparison Matrix

Table 1 Sterling Highway MP 45 to 60 Facts Summary

Traffic Solutions. MUTCD Compliance Dates & Systematic Upgrades. John Nisbet State Traffic Engineer. Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation

49-2A Clear-Zone Width for New Construction or Reconstruction B Clear-Zone Adjustment Factor, K cz, for Horizontal Curve...

Application of Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems. June 15, 2016

SAFETY IMPACT OF HIGH FRICTION SURFACE TREATMENT INSTALLATIONS IN PENNSYLVANIA

USING TWOPAS SIMULATION MODEL TO PROVIDE DESIGN AND OPERATIONS INFORMATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF IDAHO S TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS

Overcoming Highway Safety Manual Implementation Challenges

RIDOT S Statewide Roadway and Asset Data Collection Project

Statewide Roundabout Guidance

CHAPTER 18 TEMPORARY ROADS AND BRIDGES

Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) Traffic Safety Conference College Station, June 2016

Noise Monitoring Data

Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2. June 22, 2006

Wall Asset Management Implementation at Colorado Department of Transportation. Bryant Walters, Collins Engineers Mark Vessely, Shannon & Wilson

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #4 Waubonsee Community College Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Appendix C - Highway 400 Widening and Interchange Evaluation Summary Tables

I-69 Angelina and Nacogdoches Counties Scoping Study Executive Summary

Andy Keel, P.E. Roadway Design Office Criteria and Standards Section /SC

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Design of Interchange Loop Ramps and Pavement/ Shoulder Cross-Slope Breaks. Monday, November 13, :00-3:30PM ET

Identification of Crash Types, Risk Factors, and Countermeasures to Implement Systemic Safety

Public Meeting. US Highway 81 From 306 th St. to 303 rd St. & 300 th St. Yankton County NH 0081(103)6 PCN 04G5. Brandon Riss, PE Road Design Engineer

HIGHWAY ENGINEERING II

APPENDIX A: USER S MANUAL RSAP Version 3.0.0

CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION

10 Stockton 4. Guard Rail and Impact Attenuator Installation. HSIP Cycle 7

FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

The Management in Access Management. John M. Broemmelsiek, PE U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

The Role of PMS in the DOTD Decision Making Process

Roadside Design Guide. Update from the Technical Committee on Roadside Safety Chris Poole, Iowa DOT

Transcription:

HSM APPLICATION USING IHSDM (I-12 TO BUSH) April Renard, P.E. LADOTD Highway Safety

PROJECT OVERVIEW Alternative N-S corridor to I-12 Louisiana Revised Statute 47:820.2B(e) 4-lane arterial Limited access facility

I-12 TO BUSH PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES No Build Alternative B/O Alternative J Alternative P Alternative Q

ALTERNATIVE SELECTION CRITERIA Land Use Water Resources Ecological Resources Land cover Wildlife Sensitive habitats T&E species Wetlands Geology and Soils Air Quality Noise Recreational Resources Traffic and Transportation Access Operations Safety Utilities Socioeconomics Aesthetic and Visual Resources Cultural Resources Hazardous and Toxic Substances

ALTERNATIVE SELECTION CRITERIA Land Use Water Resources Ecological Resources Land cover Wildlife Sensitive habitats T&E species Wetlands Geology and Soils Air Quality Noise Recreational Resources Traffic and Transportation Access Operations Safety Utilities Socioeconomics Aesthetic and Visual Resources Cultural Resources Hazardous and Toxic Substances

SAFETY Goal: Quantify the perceived safety benefits from constructing the project. Presumption: Traffic diverted from existing roadways with lesser design standards to proposed alignment with higher design standards will result in a reduction in crashes. Methodology: HSM Predictive Method (most reliable)

AREA OF ANALYSIS Existing routes Proposed alignments

IHSDM SOFTWARE Interactive Highway Safety Design Model Developed in coordination with TRB, AASHTO and FHWA Decision-support tool; evaluates safety and operational effects of geometric design decisions on highways Incorporated HSM Predictive Method in 2010

DATA REQUIREMENTS Horizontal curvature Vertical curvature Cross sectional elements Number of lanes and lane width Shoulder width and type Cross slope Roadside foreslope Median width and type ADT Design Speed Driveway Density Roadside Hazard Ratings Intersections Traffic control Skew angle Turn lanes

DATA RESOURCES Highway Needs Database Surface Type Log File Data Collection/Management Systems Network Plans Room LandXML files* Google Earth Planning models (Transcad, REMI)

HIGHWAY NEEDS

STUDIED SECTIONS US 190 US 190 Business LA 21 LA 59 LA 36 LA 435 LA 41 LA 434 US 11 4 Alternatives

PREDICTED NUMBER OF CRASHES Route Control Section No Build Alt B/O Alt J Alt P Alt Q 1a US 190 013-11 478.44 463.41 468.03 464.58 472.14 US 190-X 013-10 27.54 26.17 26.33 26.25 26.84 LA 21 030-01 88.49 97.14 67.84 46.16 70.52 594.47 586.72 562.2 536.99 569.5 1b LA 59 281-03 84.7 70.77 80.64 76.07 80.66 LA 36 280-01 16.37 15.76 15.44 15.2 15.28 LA 59 852-09 17 11.84 14.32 12.76 11.68 LA 21 030-01 75.72 58.52 37.26 22.7 38.77 193.79 156.89 147.66 126.73 146.39 1c LA 59 281-03 84.7 70.77 80.64 76.07 80.66 LA 435 281-04 29.31 26.29 28.86 41.24 30.57 LA 41 058-02 28.98 24.62 3.22 2.98 3.18 142.99 121.68 112.72 120.29 114.41 2 US 11 018-04 28.69 27.89 25.72 27.42 27.63 LA 41 058-01 91.38 81.12 36.64 61.64 50.74 LA 41 058-02 28.98 24.62 3.22 2.98 3.18 149.05 133.63 65.58 92.04 81.55 3 LA 434 852-12 7.09 4.45 5.6 5.24 5.43 LA 36 280-03 10.11 9.9 12.02 10.93 24.43 LA 41 058-01 53.67 45.87 11.75 30.44 14.58 LA 41 058-02 28.98 24.62 3.22 2.98 3.18 99.85 84.84 32.59 49.59 47.62 4 Proposed Alternative 0 43.58 43.5 30.37 32.5 TOTAL NETWORK CRASHES 1180.15 1127.34 964.25 956.01 991.97

DISTRIBUTION OF CRASHES Severity LA (all) LA (rural 2-lane) HSM (rural 2-lane) Fatal 0.44% 2.08% 1.30% Severe 0.83% 1.08% 5.40% Moderate 6.15% 10.59% 10.90% Possible Injury 21.70% 30.92% 14.50% PDO 70.89% 55.33% 67.90% 100.00% 100% 100.00%

COST OF CRASHES Severity Cost per Person Cost per Person (w/ Loss of Quality of Life) Fatal $1,241,054 $4,275,313 Severe $917,127 $1,990,456 Moderate $160,602 $299,823 Possible Injury $7,953 $10,782 PDO $3,216 $3,216

OVERALL COMPARISON Rank Alternative Total Network Crashes Reduction in Crashes Total Cost of Crashes* Reduction in Cost 1 P 956.01 224.14 $25,693,587.03 $6,023,954.35 2 J 964.25 215.9 $25,915,044.08 $5,802,497.30 3 Q 991.97 188.18 $26,660,042.81 $5,057,498.57 4 B/O 1127.34 52.81 $30,298,227.43 $1,419,313.95 5 No Build 1180.15 0 $31,717,541.38 $0.00 *Louisiana crash distribution and cost estimates (do not include pain and suffering) Rank Alternative Total Network Crashes Reduction in Crashes Total Cost of Crashes* Reduction in Cost 1 P 956.01 224.14 $55,592,679.06 $13,033,904.54 2 J 964.25 215.9 $56,071,841.07 $12,554,742.53 3 Q 991.97 188.18 $57,683,779.29 $10,942,804.31 4 B/O 1127.34 52.81 $65,555,643.57 $3,070,940.03 5 No Build 1180.15 0 $68,626,583.60 $0.00 *Louisiana crash distribution and cost estimates (includes pain and suffering)

Questions? www.ihsdm.org April Renard, P.E. LADOTD, Highway Safety april.renard@la.gov (225)379-1919