Use of Benfuracarb in the Integrated Management of Diamondback Moth

Similar documents
Efficacy of Acetamiprid 21 Granule against Diamondback Moth on Cabbage by Soil Treatment

Insecticidal Activity of MK-139 (CME 134) Against Diamondback Moth

Field Evaluation of Efficacy of Bioinsecticides against the Diamondback Moth on Chinese Kale in Chiang Mai

Esterase Isozyme of Diamondback Moth

Insecticide Resistance in Diamondback Moth in Florida

Bio Efficacy of Some Commercially Available Eco-Friendly Insecticides against Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella L. in Cabbage

Control of Diamondback Moth in Southeast Asia by

Diamondback moth resistance to insecticides in Guangdong Province

P. J. Cameron a, A. M. Shelton b, G. P. Walker a & J. D. Tang b a New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited, Private

Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Population Density and Parasitism by Diadegma insulare on Collard in South Carolina 1

Efficiency of variable-intensity and sequential sampling for insect control decisions in cole crops in the Netherlands

Seasonality of major cabbage pests and incidence of their natural enemies in Central Kenya

MVP, a Novel Bioinsecticide for the Control of Diamondback Moth

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for Rick Foster Purdue University

Diamondback moth in canola - moving towards IPM Description Research Update for Advisers - Southern Region - February 2004 Author

Effectiveness of Dead-Spore Bacillus thuringiensis Formulation Against Diamondback Moth

Natural Enemies (Farmers' Friends) Introduction

Role of Parasitoids in Managing Diamondback Moth in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia

Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner subspecies kurstaki in the management of diamondback moth in India

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(10):

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE: Building Partnerships and a Network with the Pesticide Industry

Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC. Abstract

Verimark Insect Control Powered by Cyazypyr active Exirel Insect Control Powered by Cyazypyr active

Management of Diamondback Moth with plutellae: Prospects in the Philippines

Toxicity and Field Efficacy of Acetamiprid on Asparagus Beetle

Improving IPM decisions for the management of diamondback moth on cabbages using sequential sampling plan

Final Report. Cooperator: Dr. Amanda Hodges, Assistant Extension Scientist, Univ. of Florida

A TWO-YEAR STUDY ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR CONTROLLING ONION THRIPS (THRIPS TABACI) IN SPANISH ONIONS

Management of diamondback moth with emamectin benzoate and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai insecticides

FV406 - Brassicas: Integrated Management of Whitefly, Aleyrodes proletella. Simon Springate John Colvin, Simon Jackson.

New Soybean Pests and IPM Study Results 2016

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CHILO PARTELLUS USING EGG PARASITOID TRICHOGRAMMA CHILONIS AND BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS

Resistance, Cross-resistance and Chemical Control of Diamondback Moth in Taiwan: Recent Developments

Pre-training period before coming to Japan. Development of an inception report. During the training period in Japan. Presentation of inception reports

5. Simple and Effective Integrated Pest Management Technique for Vegetables in Northeast Thailand

DiPel Biological Insecticide

CRANBERRY PEST MANAGEMENT IN THE FUTURE

Title: Integrated control of viburnum leaf beetle with minimally toxic methods

when nurture happens first

Diamondback Moth Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Hawaii

Future Prospects for the Management of Diamondback Moth in Australian Canola. Greg Baker SARDI Entomology

Effect of Insecticides on Various Field Strains of Diamondback Moth and Its Parasitoid in Indonesia

Key words: IPM, implementation, brassicas, Australia. 228 Proceedings: The Management of Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests

Potential of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for Spodoptera Control in Yellow Granex Onion

POTENTIAL PHYTOTOXICITY OF RIMON ON LEAFY GREENS

Quantifying the Impact of Parasitoids on Diamondback Moth

Integrating novel technologies for cabbage IPM in the USA: value of on-farm research

Combating insecticide resistance in major UK pests: modelling section

Neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid Profile. Safety. Neonicotinoids and Bees

POME FRUIT Insect Control

Insecticide Sequences on Lambda-Cyhalothrin Resistance in Whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.)

Pest Management in Canola

The Potential Use of CME 134 for the Control of Vegetable Pests

With Transform insecticide, you can take back control of your crop and stop viruses in their tracks.

Insecticide Usage on Desert Lettuce,

Ants and their Control Role of ants

EFFECT OF EGG PARASITOID, TRICHOGRAMMA CHILONIS,

Population dynamics and management of diamond back moth Plutella xylostella (L.) in cabbage ecosystem of West Bengal

A survey of insect parasitoids of Plutella xylostella and the seasonal abundance of the major parasitoids in Hangzhou, China

Integrated. Pest. Dr Paul Horne IPM Technologies Pty Ltd. Management IPM

Seed Treatment: Technology and Benefits

Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences 2. Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans

Project Title: Monitoring and Reporting Insect Pests in Cole Crops and Sweet Corn (VegNet) 2016

Management of Clubroot of Asian Brassica Crops Grown on Organic Soils

Background on oilseed rape (OSR)

Pest Management in Canola

BioCeres WP AzaGuard. IR-4 Bio-Pesticide Workshop, Presented by: Manuel Campos

IPM Newsletter #7. Parasitoids of the Diamondback Moth in Thailand. Diamondback Moth STRENGTHENING FARMERS IPM IN PESTICIDE INTENSIVE AREAS

Crucifer Vegetable Insecticide Resistance Management Strategies and Issues in Australia Greg Baker

Incorporating Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus Into an IPM Program for Corn Earworm in Sweet Corn

Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants

Bt Basics for Vegetable Integrated Pest Management

Leonard P. Gianessi Cressida S. Silvers Sujatha Sankula Janet E. Carpenter

Vegetable Insect Management: Corn Earworm & Insect Vectors of Diseases

Striped Cucumber Beetle Management with Plant and Microbial Metabolites Shelby Fleischer 1, Tim Elkner 2, and Maggie Lewis 1

John Gavloski Entomologist, Manitoba Agriculture

Effect of Monocrotophos on the Leaf Eating Caterpillar, Opisina arenosella Walk, when Injected into the Trunk of the Coconut Palm.

Biology, Ecology and Management of Onion Thrips in Onion

Expand your horizons. FMC Australasia Pty Ltd Phone:

VG97040 Trichogramma wasps in vegetable IPM Programs. Richard R Llewellyn BioResources Pty Ltd

PP 1/296 (1) Principles of efficacy evaluation for low-risk plant protection products

Grower Summary PO 003. Development of safe and effective programmes for the early control of tobacco whitefly on poinsettia crops.

Effect of insecticides on Trichogramma chilonis L., egg parasitoid of large cabbage moth, Crocidolomia pavonana F.

2000 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Status, monitoring and management of SWD in Michigan

2007 Woolly and Green Apple Aphid Control Trial in Apples Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Kaysville, UT

What s New in Codling Moth Control. Janet Caprile Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension Contra Costa Co

CONTROL OF! GREENHOUSE WHITEFLY PUBLICATION C212 P1469. (1974 print) c.2. agriculture. Canada

MANAGEMENT OF EGYPTIAN ALFALFA WEEVIL AND PROTECTION OF YIELDS WITH SELECTED INSECTICIDES. Larry Godfrey and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Pesticide Product/acre REI PHI Comments Beta cyfluthrin R. 7 d grazing and hay harvest. 12 hr

CONTROL OF GARLIC FLY, DELIA SP. (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE) AUTUMN GENERATION BY MEANS OF SEED COATING PESTICIDE

THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR Regional Pest Monitoring Program

Complex Example. Page 1 of 8

IPM in Brassica vegetables and oilseed rape: challenges and opportunities

S. Sastrosiswojo, W. Setiawati, L. Prabaningrum, T.K. Moekasan, I. Sulastrini, R.E. Soeriaatmadja and Z. Abidin

INSECTICIDE APPLICATIONS TO SUGAR BEETS FOR CROWN BORER CONTROL

Wheat Science News. MANAGING VOLUNTEER CORN IN ORDER TO BREAK THE GREEN BRIDGE IN WHEAT James R. Martin Extension Professor of Wheat Science

Epizootics of Pandora blunckii and Zoophthora radicans (Entomophthoraceae: Zygomycotina) in Diamondback Moth Populations in the Philippines

Transcription:

37 Use of Benfuracarb in the Integrated Management of Diamondback Moth Norio Yasudomi, Tetsuji Miyata, Keizaburo Murai and Noriharu Umetsu Otsuka Chemical Co., Ltd., Naruto Research Center, Naruto, Tokushima, Japan Abstract Integrated pest management (IPM) is important in the control of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), on brassicas in Japan. Recent investigations showed that benfuracarb 5% granules (5G)(trade name: Oncol 5G), a new carbamate insecticide, possesses useful properties in the IPM of diamondback moth. In order to obtain the best effect from benfuracarb 5G, application timing is very important. Pot tests and field trials indicated that application of 1-2 g of the granules in the hole or on the soil around the cabbage plants was effective up to 28 days after application. Effectiveness of benfuracarb 5G against susceptible and resistant strains of diamondback moth was determined using newly hatched larvae. Benfuracarb 5G applied to soil at a rate of 2 g per plant was highly effective against all strains on potted cabbage. Over 90% control was observed up to 28 days after application. Effect of benfuracarb 5G on the beneficial arthropods was also investigated. When 2 g of the granules were applied to the soil around cabbage and broccoli in the field, no adverse effect was observed on the population of spiders, important predators of diamondback moth. Introduction Diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), is a serious and widespread pest of many brassica crops, especially cabbage, and the development of resistance in this pest to a number of organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides has become a serious problem worldwide. Many researchers point out that integrated pest management (IPM) is an important way to control DBM. Recent investigations indicated that benfuracarb [ethyl (methyl) aminothiol-n-isopropyl-0- alaninate], a new carbamate insecticide from Otsuka Chemical Co., Ltd. (Goto et al. 1983; Takagi 1989) possesses useful properties for the IPM of DBM. Benfuracarb 5% granular formulation (5G) is now widely used in Japan for the control of DBM. This report describes our recent studies indicating the useful properties of benfuracarb 5G in the IPM of DBM. Insecticides Materials and Methods The following insecticides were used throughout the study: benfuracarb (98.5 % pure) and benfuracarb 20EC; acephate (> 98%, Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.); acephate 50WP (Takeda Chemical Industries Ltd.); permethrin (92.8%) and permethrin 20EC (Sankei Chemical Co., Ltd.); fenvalerate: malathion 40WP (Nihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd.); methomyl 45WP (Shell Chemical Co., Ltd.); chlorfluazuron 5EC (Sankyo Co., Ltd.). 333

334 Yasudomi, Miyata, Murai and Umetsu Insects Susceptible strains (S), resistant strains (R) and highly resistant strains (HR) of DBM were used. The S strain was provided in 1988 by Dr. H. Hama, Chugoku National Agricultural Experiment Station. The R strain was collected in 1989 and 1990 from a cabbage field of Otsuka Chemical Co. Ltd. in Tokushima Prefecture. The HR strain was collected in 1990 from the cabbage field of Mizobe-cho, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan, where DBM populations have developed resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. The S strain was reared for several successive generations. The R and HR strains were reared for three to four generations in the laboratory at 25± 1 C, photoperiod 16L: 8D, by the method by Kaoshihara and Yamada (1976) with slight modification. Susceptibility of DBM to benfuracarb and other insecticides Susceptibility to benfuracarb and other insecticides was determined by the leaf-dipping method. Excised cabbage leaves, about 4 X 4 cm, were dipped for 1 min in aqueous solution containing a spreader (64 ppm) and each chemical. The treated and untreated leaves were put in a plastic cup (diam 8 cm, depth 4 cm) where 10 3rd instar larvae of DBM were released. The insects were maintained at 25±l C, photoperiod 16L:8D for 48 hours. There were six replications per concentration of each insecticide. Relation between leaf position and efficacy against DBM Benfuracarb was applied onto the soil around the cabbage plant at four true leaf stage in Wagner pots at a rate of 1 or 2 g/plant. Each cabbage leaf was excised and put in plastic cups (diam 12 cm, depth 6 cm), where 10 first instar larvae of R strain DBM were released. The cups were maintained at 25±1 C, photoperiod 16L:8D, for 48 hours. Mortality of larvae was recorded 2 days after the release. Cabbage leaves were separated into three positions, i.e. upper, middle and lower positions. The test had six replicates. Application timing of benfuracarb Benfuracarb 5G (1 or 2 g/plant) was applied when cabbage plants had 3-4 leaves (in nursery bed) at 7 days before transplanting, at transplanting (4 leaf stage) and 7 days (5-6 leaf stage) or 14 days (8-9 leaf stage) after transplanting in 16 cm diameter Wagner pots. As a control, acephate 5G was applied at a rate of 2 g/plant. Cabbage leaves were excised at predetermined intervals (3, 7, 14, 21 or 28 days after transplanting) and placed in plastic cups where 10 hatched larvae of DBM (R strain) were released. The cups were maintained at 25 ± 1 C, photoperiod 16L:8D, for 48 hours. Testing was conducted at six replications for each rate. In the case of application at transplanting, third instar larvae of R strain DBM were used for the evaluation of insecticidal activity of benfuracarb. Efficacy of benfuracarb against three different strains of DBM Benfuracarb 5G (2g/plant) was applied on the soil around cabbage plants at transplanting from the vinyl pots to 16 cm Wagner pots. Cabbage leaves were excised 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after the transplanting and placed in the plastic cups where 10 hatched larvae of DBM were released. The cups were maintained in the laboratory at 25 1 C, photoperiod 16L:8D, for 48 hours. There were six replications for each rate. Acephate 5G was used as a control at a rate of 2 g/plant.

Benfuracarb in DBM IPM 335 Field trial of benfuracarb in cabbage The field trial for the efficacy of benfuracarb 5G against DBM, green peach aphid and common cabbage worm was conducted at our experimental farm in Tokushima Prefecture. Benfuracarb 5G (1 or 2 g/plant) was applied to the soil around the cabbage plants (Shikidori) at 5-6 leaf stage on 5 June 1990 on three 20-m rows (spacing 0.5 m). Acephate 5G was used as a control at a rate of 2 g/plant. The number of pest insects on 20 cabbage plants in each row was counted. Efficacy of benfuracarb on spiders To study the effect of benfuracarb 5G on the population of spiders one experiment each was conducted in a cabbage field (30 m x 2 rows) in Hiketa-cho, Kagawa Prefecture, Japan, and in a broccoli field (25 m X 2 rows) in Ichiba-cho, Tokushima Prefecture, Japan. Benfuracarb 5G (2 g/plant) was applied to the soil around cabbage plants (Kogetsu) of 6-7 leaf stage on 8 September 1990 and broccoli plant (Haitsu) of 5-6 leaf stage on 7 September 1990. The number of spiders on 50 plants in each row was counted 5, 12, 19 and 27 days after the application to cabbage, and 7, 15, 22 and 32 days after the application to broccoli. In the conventional application plots methomyl 45 WP was applied to cabbage on 23 September 1990 and fenvalerate: malathion 40WP, chlorfluazuron 5EC and permethrin 20EC were applied to broccoli on 15 and 24 September and 1 October, respectively. Results Comparison of susceptibility of DBM larvae to benfuracarb and other insecticides The LC50 values of benfuracarb and other insecticides for three different strains of DBM larvae are shown in Table 1. The LC50 of benfuracarb in the 1990 testing was 14, 48 and 573 ppm for S, R and HR strains, respectively. The resistance ratio was 3.4 in the R strain and 40.9 in the HR strain. The data indicated similar susceptibility of both S and R strains in 1989 and 1990, while HR strain showed high levels of resistance. In contrast to this, both R and HR strains showed quite high levels of resistance to other insecticides. The level of resistance to insecticides was extremely high in the HR strain. Table I. Susceptibility of 3rd instar DBM larvae to benfuracarb (leaf dipping method). Insecticides s strain' R straind HR straine Benfuracarb Technicala 9 24 Formulationb (20 EC) 14 48 573 Methomyl Formulation (45 WP) I45 61 3 I579 Acephate Technical 8 I73 Permethrin Formulation (50 WP) Technical 5 9 97 73 3984 Formulation (20 EC) 5 44 364 Fenvalerate (I 0%) Formulation (40 WP) 26 359 3943 Malathion (30%) ªTrial in 1989; in 1990; 'Susceptible strain; strain; resistant strain.

336 Yasudomi, Miyata, Murai and Umetsu Relation between leaf position and efficacy against DBM Benfuracarb 5G at a rate of 2 g/plant showed 100% mortality in all leaf positions 10 days after treatment (Table 2). After 20 days 100% mortality was observed in middle and lower leaf position, while the mortality was lower (about 80%) in upper leaf position. The same tendency was observed at 1 g/plant. Table 2. Efficacy of benfuracarb 5G against 1st instar DBM larvae (R strain) fed on cabbage leaf of different positions. Mortality (%) at indicated days after treatment Leaf position 10 days 20 days I g/plant 2 g/plant I g/plant 2 g/plant Upper 91 100 54 81 Middle 100 100 100 100 Lower 100 100 100 100 Application timing of benfuracarb Application timing is very important to obtain the highest level of effectiveness of benfuracarb 5G against DBM (Fig. 1-3). The best effect was obtained by application of granules at transplanting. Complete mortality was obtained up to 28 days after the application even at a rate of 1 g/plant. Slightly lower efficacy was observed with other application timings. Benfuracarb 5G was also effective against 3rd instar larvae when applied at transplanting (Fig. 3). Efficacy of benfuracarb against three strains of DBM Insecticidal activity of benfuracarb against S, R and HR strains was determined using hatched larvae and excised cabbage leaves of middle leaf position from the potted cabbage plants which were treated with benfuracarb 5G. As shown in Fig. 4, benfuracarb 5G was highly effective against all three strains of larvae by plant foot application at a rate of 2 g/plant. Over 90% control was observed from 7 to 28 days after the application. Acephate 5G used as a control was less effective and lacks residual activity especially against the HR strain. Field trial for benfuracarb in cabbage A field trial was conducted in 1990 in order to confirm the effectiveness and residual activity of benfuracarb 5G which was observed in the potted plant test. In the field trial efficacy of benfuracarb 5G was determined not only for DBM, but also for green peach aphid and common cabbage worm because of the occurrence of the three pests in the the field trial. As shown in Fig. 5, effectiveness of benfuracarb 5G against all three pests was observed 28 days after the treatment at a rate of 1 or 2 g/plant. Effect of benfuracarb on spiders In order to see the effect of benfuracarb 5G on the beneficial arthropods, field trials were conducted in 1990 on cabbage and broccoli. The effect of benfuracarb 5G on the population of spiders in each field was determined following plant foot application of the granules (2 g/ plant). Benfuracarb 5G did not have any effect on the population of spiders, important predators of DBM, in cabbage and broccoli fields. Mean number of spiders per plant in both

Benfuracarb in DBM IPM 337 100 Benfuracarb 5G Acephate 5G Fig. I Days after treatment Efficacy of benfuracarb 5G against I st instar larvae (R strain) of DBM on potted cabbage treated 7 days before transplanting in nursery bed. I 7 10 14 21 28 Days after treatment- Fig. 2. Efficacy of benfuracarb 5G against 1st instar larvae (R strain) of DBM on potted cabbage treated 7 days after transplanting (above) and 14 days after transplanting (below). I 50 Benfuracarb 5G 2g/plant 50 1st instar larvae 14 21 28 Days after transplanting Fig. 3. Efficacy of benfuracarb 5G treated at transplanting against DBM larvae (R strain) on potted cabbage. benfuracarb 5G 2g, ) benfuracarb 5G 1g, acephate 5G 2g a) Days after transplanting. 50 Acephate 5G 2g /plant 7 14 21 28 Days after transplanting Fig. 4. Efficacy of benfuracarb 5G and acephate 5G treated at transplanting against 1st instar larvae of DBM strains on potted cabbage. S strain; R strain; HR strain.

338 Yasudomi, Miyata, Murai and Umetsu Common cabbage worm Benfuracarb 5G Benfuracarb 5G Acephate 5G 1g/plant 2g/plant 2g/plant Untreated Fig. 5. Efficacy of benfuracarb 5G against cabbage pests in the field trial. Observations were made 28 days after transplanting. benfuracarb 5G-treated and untreated plots increased from 1 to 2 during the 1-month test period. On the other hand, populations of spiders decreased significantly in the plots where methomyl or synthetic pyrethroids were sprayed. Discussion Development of pyrethroid resistance in DBM in Japan was first confirmed in Kagoshima, Miyazaki and Okinawa prefectures in 1984 (Koshihara 1988), and existence of resistance was reported all over Japan including Hokkaido by the summer of 1990. Development of crossresistance among pyrethroid insecticides (Hama 1987) in addition to cross-resistance among organophosphorus insecticides (Hama 1986) has become a serious problem for growers in controlling DBM by insecticides. Current studies indicated that benfuracarb, a new carbamate insecticide, is effective in controlling DBM, even R and HR strains when granular formulation (5G) is applied to the soil. The systemic activity of benfuracarb 5G is probably responsible for insecticidal activity and residual effectiveness. The effectiveness of benfuracarb 5G against the HR strain, one of the most resistant strains in Japan (Horikiri and Makino 1987), was also confirmed in the field trial by Tanaka et al. (1990). It is very important that an insecticide used in IPM is not toxic to predators. The results indicated that benfuracarb 5G does not affect the population of spiders in cabbage and broccoli

Benfuracarb in DBM IPM 339 fields following soil treatment. In the same field trial, the population of spiders was significantly reduced by conventional use of methomyl or pyrethroid insecticides. Nemoto (1986) reported that application of methomyl 45WP caused reduction in the population of the spider Pardosa astrigera. Benfuracarb 5G thus possesses useful properties for the IPM of DBM. A number of trials have been conducted by researchers in Japan using benfuracarb 5G in an IPM program, i.e. a combination with foliar insecticides, protective net or DBM sex pheromone. Horikiri (1989) proposed a reduction in the number of applications of conventional insecticides by combined use of benfuracarb 5G and other insecticides. Morishita and Azuma (1990) reported the usefulness of combined use of benfuracarb with nets in DBM control programs in cabbage fields. Iwata (1989) also studied the use of DBM sex pheromone with two applications of benfuracarb at transplanting and conventional insecticides (one time) 30-40 days after the transplanting, instead of five applications of conventional insecticides, which provided excellent control of DBM. It would be of interest to consider using benfuracarb 5G in combination with Trichogramma chilonis, an egg parasite of DBM (Iga 1985), in a DBM control program. References Goto, T., Tanaka, A.K., Yasudomi. N., Osaki, N., Iida, S., and Umetsu, N. 1983. OK-174, A new broad-spectrum carbamate insecticide. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Plant Prot., Brighton, England, 360-367. Hama, H. 1986. Resistance spectrum to various insecticides in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 30,227-284. (In Japanese with English summary). - 1987. Development of pyrethroid resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) Appl. Entomol. Zool, 22, 166-175. Horikiri, M. 1989. Total control of diamondback moth by Oncol 5G. Kongetsungonogyo. New information of plant protection. Kagakukogyo Nippo Sha., 269-27 1. (In Japanese). Horikiri, M., and Makino, S. 1987. Susceptibility of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), to insecticides in Kagoshima Prefecture. Proc. Assoc, Plant Prot. Kyushu, 33, 131-135. (In Japanese with English summary). Iga, M. 1985. The seasonal prevalence of occurrence and the life tables of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 29, 119-125. (In Japanese with English summary). Iwata, N. 1989. Personal communication. Gunma Agric. Res. Center. Koshihara, T., and Yamada, H. 1976. A simple mass-rearing technique of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), on germinated rape seeds. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 20, 110-1 14. (In Japanese with English summary). Morishita, M., and Azuma, K. 1990. Use for row cover to protect cabbage from diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) Proc. Kansai Plant Prot., 32, 29-34. (In Japanese with English summary). Nemoto, H. 1986. Factors inducing resurgence in the diamondback moth after application of methomyl. In: Talekar, N.S., and Griggs, T.D. (ed.) Diamondback moth management: Proceedings of First International Workshop, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, 387-394. Takagi, Y. 1989. Benfuracarb (Oncol), a new broad-spectrum carbamate insecticide. Jpn. Pestic. Info. No. 54, 23-27. Tanaka, A., Suenaga, H., and Araya, A. 1990. Control of pests of cruciferous vegetable. Test results of Kynshyu Pest Control Association No. 2-2, 128-131. (In Japanese).