Survey of Bottom Substrate Composition and Fish Habitat Value at Nett Lake

Similar documents
Lake Lou Yaeger Section 206 Study Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration

US Steel/Spirit Lake Sediment Cleanup Update for River Corridor Coalition

Pierce County Islands and the Head of Lake Pepin

The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control

Ecological Considerations in Setting MFLs and Lake Regulation Targets for the Ocklawaha Chain of Lakes

Treatment Report. Professional Lake Management (PLM) was awarded a contract to manage Flowering Rush within the Pelican River Watershed District.

Clam Lakes (Lower & Upper), Burnett County Four-Phased Lake Management Planning Project Description

Public Notice: Application for Permit

FINAL WILDLIFE and VEGETATION RESOURCES STUDY PLAN. Blue Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Expansion. Prepared by:

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

Upper Mississippi River Floodplain Restoration Priorities in Pools 1, 2, 3, Upper 4 and Lower Vermillion River

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits May 2, 2017

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Meeting with PRRD Board

Public Notice NATIONWIDE PERMIT REISSUANCE FOR THE STATE OF OHIO

TURKEY RIVER BOTTOMS DELTA AND BACKWATER COMPLEX

Truckee River Aquatic Invasive Plant Survey Results

S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Northern Chain of Lakes

Fish Ecology and Management Workshop. Fisheries management options

THIS IS NOT A PAID ADVERTISEMENT. Public Notice No. CENAP-OP-R In Reply Refer to:

Tim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural Resources Division Mat Millenbach, Western Rivers Conservancy Sarah Beesley, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits March 26, 2019

BOSTON BAY HABITAT REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT (HREP) MERCER COUNTY, ILLINOIS

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 04/24/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 04/23/2018

Our Journey Aquatic Invasive Species Eurasian Milfoil (EWM) April 23, 2015

Maine s Land Use Regulations and Erosion Control Techniques

SECTION 404(b)(1) EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE FOR THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FEDERALLY AUTHORIZED BILOXI HARBOR NAVIGATION PROJECT OTT BAYOU

7.6 Lake Aquilla Storage Reallocation

Enbridge Oil Spill. Kalamazoo. Marshall. Augusta Battle Creek. Galesburg Ceresco. Release Site. Morrow Lake

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

FACT PATTERN THE RESERVATION

Hydrographic Surveys. The Key to Surface Water Planning and Management. Over 1000 INLAND Hydrographic Surveys Completed 5/25/2017

Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control

Soils Study. Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2911) June Long View Associates, Inc. Ridgefield, Washington

Chapter 105 Dam Safety and Waterway Management

Adjacent to Pearl Avenue, in the City of Burlington, Burlington County, New

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 37 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

CHECKLIST FOR ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT/SAMPLING

Available Yield from Reallocation in Federal Reservoirs Excluding Lake Aquilla. The USACE study evaluated four alternatives for each reservoir:

Section 208. SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

LAKE MINNEWAWA ASSOCIATION

Ohio Bioassessments - Applicatio

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION IN COASTAL MISSISSIPPI: MARSH RE-ESTABLISHMENT PROJECT HARRISON AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI

Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

Texas: Water For Wildlife. Cappy Smith

Biological Fact Sheet - Cooling Water Intake Structure Bureau of Habitat, Steam Electric Unit

Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites

Special Public Notice

PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT MONITORING P LAN DRAFT

St. Marys River Little Rapids Ecosystem Restoration. July 31, th Annual Conference on Ecosystem Restoration July 29 August 2, 2013

Notice No Closing Date: May 2, 2015

Spokane River Project Aquatic Weed Management Program

METHODS PAPER: River Transect Sampling of Physical Attributes Downstream of the Mactaquac Generating Station

Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Carp Creek 2013 Summary Report

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

Chapter FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS

NRCS Programs and Practices for Riparian Areas in Hawaii

Iron County Loon Project Practicum in Loon and Lake Ecology and Management Final Report 2015

C. Staffing Needs Approximately 150 staff days TSA #3 staff time will also be utilized.

Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment. September 1995

404(b)(1) EVALUATION

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

APPENDIX C REPRESENTATIVE HABITAT PHOTOGRAPHS

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Stream Health. Stream Bugs Our Stream Health Communicators. Upper Nottawasaga River Stream Health. NVCA Science & Stewardship

Rogue Basin Ecological Integrity Assessment and Climate Change Management Interactions

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

Hypothesized Changes in Littoral Habitat with Continued Water Level Decline in a Central Wisconsin Seepage Lake

Risk Assessment Needs for Land Management Decisions at Cherry Point, Whatcom County, Washington

S.R. 2027, Section 02B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Early History of Rice Creek Field Station

PUBLIC NOTICE NO. FP13-AB03-05 August 30, 2013 CESAM-PD-EC JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE PLYMOUTH HARBOR FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT PLYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS

Impoundment Fluctuation, Assessment of Littoral Zone Habitat, Mapping of Wild Rice Beds, and Assessment of River Shoreline Erosion

GREAT KILLS HARBOR, STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT MAINTENANCE DREDGING

THIS IS NOT A PAID ADVERTISEMENT. Public Notice No. CENAP-OP-R In Reply Refer to: REGULATORY BRANCH

DRAFT - CLALLAM COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM (SMP)

Rascal Goose. Reach 1. Rascal Goose. Reach 2. å å å. Main Goose Pit. Stream Reach 3. Main Goose Pit. Stream Reach 7

* Horseshoe Lake. Fall 2017 Hybrid Water-milfoil High Density Area

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Public Notice: Application for Permit

MANAGING MINNESOTA S SHALLOW LAKES FOR WATERFOWL AND WILDLIFE

BARAGA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #28 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

8. A. AQUATIC HABITATS

Avista Dam Relicensing Factsheet Commenting on the Draft License Application

Relicensing Study 3.5.1

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION LAKE ODESSA HABITAT REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL APPENDIX G

Definitions. Currently serviceable: Useable as is or with some maintenance, but not so Degraded as to essentially require reconstruction.

THIS IS NOT A PAID ADVERTISEMENT. Public Notice. Public Notice No. CENAP-OP-R

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

14. Sustainable Forestry Principals

Chapter 2. Watershed Characteristics

Deepwater Wind was awarded a 20 year contract (PPA) to supply power to LIPA in East Hampton. 90 MW wind farm located 30 miles east of Montauk

Atlantic Salmon ESA Listing Workshop

5 Public Involvement. 5.1 Proposed Action Scoping and Draft EIS. Echo Trail Area Forest Management Project

Compartment Review Presentation

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Transcription:

Survey of Bottom Substrate Composition and Fish Habitat Value at Nett Lake Prepared by: Frank G. Stone, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ashland FRO May 2006

The objective of this project was to characterize and map bottom substrate composition and fish habitat value at Nett Lake. This information will provide data critical to the Bois Forte Natural Resources Department for the assessment of wild rice production, fish habitat and the long term management of Nett Lake. This information will also fulfill management recommendations specified in the Bois Forte Integrated Resources Management and Aquatic Resources Management Plans. Methods: During May 9-10, 2006, I conducted an assessment of the common substrate types found in Nett Lake. A systematic mid-lake sampling method as well as a continuous line transect circumventing the lake, were established to determine substrate types. Using an air-boat (supplied by the Bois Forte Natural Resources Department), substrate types were GPS referenced and identified into one of five categories: silt/muck/clay sand (partial size <0.25") gravel (partial size from 0.25" up to 2.5") cobble (partial size from 2.5" up to 9") bolder/bedrock (partial size >10") Air-boat supplied by the Bois Forte Natural Resources Department. Substrate types were identified by prodding the lake bottom with a long aluminum pole (12 by 1⅜ ) and feeling for the texture and vibrations that resulted. At each sampling point, the pole was plunged into the substrate several inches and at two different areas (approximately 20 feet apart). If additional verification was needed to identify a substrate type, a Ponar Dredge was used to pull up a sample of the soil. A Ponar Dredge was used when needed to verify substrate composition. 2

Systematic Mid-Lake Sampling: A total of 109 reference points were provided by the Bois Forte Forestry Department for this survey (refer to adjacent image). Using a GIS program, each point was evenly spaced (approximately 1,584 feet or.3 mile). The resulting positions were then transferred into a handheld GPS recorder. This unit was used by the boat operator to locate each specific sampling point. The midlake survey began in the southwest corner of Nett Lake and was concluded in the upper northeast corner. All 109 reference points were identified except for the northeastern portion of the lake were safe boat navigation was of a concern. Those areas (point numbers 1, 11 and 12) were arbitrarily assigned a classification of silt/muck/clay. Continuous Line Transect Sampling: Following the natural contour of the lake, the boat operator maintained a path within 20-30 feet of the shoreline. Where thick vegetation was not present, the boat was often maneuvered within 10 feet of shore. An aluminum pole was again used to probe the substrate. For this portion of the survey, clear water transparency significantly helped to determine the type of substrates present. As the boat continued to follow the shore line, a GPS point was recorded for each change in the substrate type. Starting from the Nett Lake boat landing/picnic area and proceeding north, one complete circle of the lake and Spirit Island were made. Using an aluminum pole to probe the substrate (from boat dock). 3

Results: Systematic Mid-Lake Sampling: Of the 109 sample points we assessed during this survey, 100% of the samples were composed of silt/muck/clay. Number of Sample Points Silt/Muck/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Bolder/Bedrock 109 0 0 0 0 Continuous Line Transect Sampling: During this portion of the project, continues observations were made for any substrate changes throughout the entire circumference of the lake. Boat speed was maintained at a slow pace that allowed for easy site identification and prodding with the aluminum pole. As a result of this effort it was determined that the predominate substrate type was silt/muck/clay. Only three areas near the boat landing were found that contained other substrate types (Table 1). Table 1. GPS reference points and map showing the only gravel, cobble or bolder substrate types found in Nett Lake during May 9-10, 2006. GPS Reference Sand Gravel Cobble Bolder/ Bedrock N 48º 06 35.3 W 93º 06 23.2 (Big Point) N 48º 06 43.2 W 93º 06 14.6 (Big Point) N 48º 07 09.2 W 93º 06 00.3 (Spirit Island) 4

Recommendations: The extensive wetland and bog conditions surrounding Nett Lake serve to trap soil within the thick vegetative mat surrounding the lake. As a result, the substrate type most common within Nett Lake is composed of sand, muck and clay. Only three small outcropping of gravel and boulders were noted during this survey. My recommendation for the long term management of Nett Lake is to continue to build on the natural strengths that the lake can offer. Attempting to enhance the recreational fishery (specifically for northern pike) would be limiting due to the shallowness of the lake (<8 feet deep) and frequent winter kill conditions. Chris Holm (Nett Lake Reservation Water Resources Program Manager) noted that fish species within Nett Lake are able to overwinter only by migrating into adjacent stream inlets during the winter months. The great strength that Nett Lake has to offer is the habitat and food resources it can provide to migratory waterfowl and songbirds. I believe that keeping the lake open for wild rice production and managing for waterfowl would be the best use of Nett Lake. This management approach would also support the tribe s most prominent and culturally important natural resource, the continued production of wild rice. I understand that the consumption of wild rice seed by waterfowl is of concern to the tribe. This specific issue will be addressed next year by our wildlife biologist within the second phase of this project. Due to the gradual contour, shallow lake depths and the apparent inability of the lake to flush out accumulations of sediment, the encroachment of emergent vegetation will continue to pose significant impacts on wild rice production. The tribe may want to identify the cause of the increased sediment loading into Nett Lake. The 2004 Tribal Landowner Incentive Grant proposal submitted by the tribe made the following two statements: Evidence suggests that wild rice decline in Nett Lake started decades past, with the advent of more sophisticated timber harvesting techniques and the decline of fur trapping and trading. Damming of the Nett River outfall has, over seventeen years, resulted in the accelerated stagnation of the basin and consolidation of rice straw and sediment within the basin. Taking steps to reduce sediment loading and restore the natural flushing actions of the lake will increase the areas for wild rice production. If Nett River dam modifications are deemed necessary to achieve this goal, I would again suggest that the tribe consider applying for a Tribal Landowner Incentive Grant and also seek other grant opportunities to help address the financial concerns associated with such an undertaking. 5