Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS Page

Similar documents
Effective Date: December 2016 Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS Page

Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.066, F.A.C. Form ITP IAS Page

Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.066, F.A.C. Form EPI IAS Page

INITIAL PROGRAM APPROVAL TRAINING

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CONTINUED PROGRAM APPROVAL STANDARDS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (PDCP) (Form PDCP CAS-2015)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CONTINUED PROGRAM APPROVAL STANDARDS INITIAL TEACHER PREPARATION (ITP) PROGRAM (Form ITP CAS-2015)

Continued Approval Standard Guidelines

Bay District Schools

Bay District Schools

COMPETENCIES AND SKILLS REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATION IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN FLORIDA, Fourth Edition 2012

Review and Approval Guide for Non-classroom Instructional Personnel Evaluation Systems DOE Form No. EQEVAL-2012NC

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Assessing the Effectiveness of a Teacher Induction Program

TEACHER SUPPORT AND COACHING (TSC) ENDORSEMENT PROGRAM

SECTION 2: SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Assessing the Effectiveness of a Leader Induction Program

SUPERINTENDENT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB DESCRIPTION

Principal Preparation Program Internship Task Matrix

Texas Principal Competency Reflection. By Corey C. Cornett UST-HISD Cohort 1 Member Dr. Leiker Internship II 6331 April 2014

Instructional Leader Preparation Program Approval Review. Final Report for: Cumberland University

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Action Item November 18, SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment to Rule 6A , Florida Teacher Certification Examinations.

Mentors and Partners for Candidates in the Induction Program to Clear a Preliminary Single Subject, Multiple Subject, or Education Specialist

Concordia University Portland College of Education Professional Education Plan (PEP) Professional Administrator Certificate

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Induction Guidance Self-Assessment. Roles & Responsibilities

Policy Title Supervision and Evaluation Code No

SCHOOL OF EDUCATION. On Brockton Avenue P.O. Box 3080 Between University Street &Grove Street Redlands, CA (909) (909)

CERTIFICATED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PLAN

Thomas B. Fordham Foundation Sponsorship Application Organizational Plan Organizational Plan: B.1. B.1. Governing Body

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS JOB DESCRIPTION

Performance Accountability Systems

Region One Incentive Strategies for Educators

Florida Virtual School 445 West Amelia Street Suite 301 Orlando, FL

Induction and Mentoring Guidelines

The superintendent routinely considers school or corporation goals when making personnel decisions.

Eligibility and Application Information

LEADER INDUCTION PROGRAM ASSESSMENT (PRE-ASSESSMENT AND POST-ASSESSMENT) Pre-Assessment Date: Post-Assessment Date:

BOSA COMPETENCY MATRIX Minnesota Administrative Licensure. K - 12 Principal

JOB DESCRIPTION. PERSONNEL EVALUATION RESPONSIBILITY: Professional and non professional personnel if delegated by the principal

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) Building

BELLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Director of Operations/Chief Talent Officer

Texas City Independent School District

2639 North Monroe Street, Suite B-112 Tallahassee, FL Application for Special Inspector Certification. Rule 61G Form FBPE/006 12/17

Whitley County School District Certified Evaluation Plan. Adopted and Reviewed June 2018 Mr. John Siler, Superintendent

Induction Candidate Handbook

Field Experience Handbook

Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education (VAL-ED)

To earn the micro-credential, Mentoring to Improve Content Instruction, the educator must achieve demonstrated on each of the criteria.

TERMINATION OF CONTRACT REDUCTION IN FORCE

NDSBA SUPERINTENDENT EVALUATION TEMPLATE

STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCES

NO , Chapter 1 TALLAHASSEE, February 13, Human Resources

To the Education Service Center Region 11:

Competencies and Standards Generation for the Planning Profession Phase 2

Florida Department of Education CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK. One Core, One Program with Three Occupational Completion Points

System Framework Personnel/Workforce (PN) Component Draft updated October 23, 2014

Elementary School. Chairperson Guidelines. Revised: 2/28/08 1

Mansfield Twp. School District Yes or N/A = 1 No = 0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Elementary Grading Procedures

California Career Pathways Connecting the Work

SUPERINTENDENT BALANCED GOVERANCE EVALUATION MANUAL

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Personnel Subject to the Master Agreement

California Career Pathways Connecting the Work

Texas Association of School Boards Sample Superintendent Evaluation Instrument

Regulations for the Evaluation and Assessment Of School Personnel

JOB DESCRIPTION. Evaluation Type Assistant Principal. FLSA Exempt. Date Revised May 2018

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Skill Standards Checklist

Raymore-Peculiar School District. Strategic Plan Executive Summary

STATE PERSONNEL SYSTEM

For self-evaluation of an already-approved program

Northern Illinois University. College of Education. Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and Foundations

UCLA-RFP-FY MMACO-0288 GSEIS-Smarter Balanced College Admission Collaboration Statement of Work

Student Learning Outcomes Annual Report Process

NATIONAL RECOGNITION REPORT Advanced Preparation of Early Childhood Professionals

Georgia Department of Education Principal Induction Guidance. Introduction

NEBO SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Application and Self-evaluation Provider Guideline E & A FET 3C. E & A FET 3C 06 August 2013 Page 1

Wake County Public Schools

System Framework for Part C and Section 619:

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness (TLE) Tulsa Model O B S E R VAT I O N A N D E V A L U AT I O N S Y S T E M P R E S E N T E D B Y O E A S T A F F

REGION 11 California Core Competencies [Grant Managers]

Southgate Independent School District Updated June 2018 Certified Evaluation Plan

DRAFT December 21, 2017

Holistic Summative Scoring

BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UDC RESOLUTION NO

Principal Selection Process. Office of Human Resources. October 2016

Illinois State Board of Education

Action Plan. Management Structures. Action Plan 2-1 OPPAGA A-1

BOSA COMPETENCY MATRIX Minnesota Administrative Licensure. Superintendent

School Psychology PhD

We are asking superintendents to ensure that this developmental year is as successful as possible by:

GREATNESS BY DESIGN. Supporting Outstanding Teaching to Sustain a Golden State

Strategic Plan Development. LaToya W. Harrison Assistant Superintendent, Curriculum & Instruction

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Teacher Induction Guidance

GENERAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: VIA PATHWAYS TO WORK PROCESS EVALUATION

What do recruitment, selection, and training have in common? Purpose. Employee Recruitment, Selection, and Training: Complementary Systems

Department of Educational Leadership College of Education Florida Atlantic University A. COURSE NUMBER, SEQUENCE NUMBER & COURSE TITLE:

Using Data to Advance Human Capital Management Systems

MONROE COUNTY SCHOOLS POSITION DESCRIPTION Title: Data Analyst

Transcription:

Instructions: A Florida public school district seeking initial approval of its school principal (SP) program, authorized in section 1012.562, Florida Statutes, shall submit an electronic folio that contains a description and supporting evidence of the design, delivery, curriculum content and evaluation of the specified program. The Florida Department of Education Initial Program Approval Standards for School Principal (SP) Programs (Form SP IAS-2016) contains the specifications for what must be included in an initial electronic folio. Electronic folio submissions may be submitted to the department by the quarterly deadlines of each year, January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15. School districts shall submit the folios by email to EdPrepFolio@fldoe.org or mail an electronic storage device containing the folio to: Florida Department of Education Office of Educator Preparation 325 West Gaines Street, Room 124 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400 Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS-2016 1 Page

A program folio shall contain the following: Standard 1. Program Candidate and Completer Quality The program ensures that candidates and completers are prepared to serve as school principals for schools in which prekindergarten through grade 12 (p-12) students are provided high quality instruction to meet high standards for academic achievement. Indicator 1.1: Each program consistently applies admission requirements in accordance with section 1012.562(3)(a), F.S., and 6A-5.081, F.A.C. The following criteria must be met to receive a rating of Acceptable. The program describes: 1. Admission requirements and procedures used to determine a candidate has met the admission requirements outlined in s. 1012.562(3)(a), F.S., and 6A-5.081, F.A.C., to include: Hold a Florida certificate in educational leadership (Level 1); Earned a highly effective or effective summative performance under s. 1012.34, F.S. Satisfactorily performed instructional leadership responsibilities as measured by the evaluation system in s. 1012.34, F.S. 2. Plan for annually collecting, monitoring and reporting data on candidates who applied to, were admitted to, and enrolled in the program. Indicator 1.2: The program must demonstrate that each completer possesses the required knowledge, skills, and professional behaviors relevant for professional practices and work characteristics in school leadership. The program shall describe: 1. Process of how it will assess, monitor and document each program candidate s progress and mastery of competency-based training and field experiences aligned to: Florida Principal Leadership Standards (FPLS) as defined in 6A-5.080, F.A.C.; Personnel evaluation criteria under s. 1012.34, F.S.; William Cecil Golden Professional Development Program for School Leaders, pursuant to s. 1012.986, F.S.; and Individualized instruction using a customized learning plan based on data from self-assessment, selection and performance evaluation instruments. 2. Matrix that describes the critical tasks, assignments and assessments during coursework or training and culminating field experience(s) and internship for the competencies and skills associated with each component of the curricula, including: Title for each course within the competency-based curricula Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS-2016 2 Page

Performance measure or indicator that is being assessed Title and description of critical task or assessment activity Specific proficiency criteria program candidates must meet. 3. Plan for providing documented remediation, mentoring and coaching feedback that supports program candidate s progression throughout the program and mastery of the curricula. 4. Plan for analyzing candidate performance data at the individual and program level to ensure candidate s mastery of the curricula. Indicator 1.3: The program must demonstrate that it can satisfactorily meet the purpose of school leader preparation programs pursuant to s. 1012.562(1), F.S., by annually submitting an institutional program evaluation plan that includes specific data outlined in section 1012.562(2)(b), F.S., for program completers. The program shall describe the process of how it will monitor, collect and analyze evidence to include: 1. Number and passage rate of candidates who complete program coursework on the Florida Educational Leadership Examination (FELE) 2. Number and percentage of program completers who are placed in school leadership positions in Florida public schools 3. Results from program completers performance evaluations required under s. 1012.34, F.S. 4. Impact that program completers have on student learning as measured by the formulas pursuant to s. 1012.34(7), F.S. 5. Performance results and retention rates of classroom teachers at schools of program completers Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS-2016 3 Page

Standard 2. Field Experiences The program ensures high-quality field experiences in purposeful p-12 settings that offer repeated opportunities to practice, receive feedback on, and ultimately demonstrate the core expectations of effective school administrators outlined in the Florida Principal Leadership Standards. Indicator 2.1: Program candidates are placed in high quality field experiences in which they can effectively demonstrate the Florida Principal Leadership Standards. 1. The school district describes: A detailed plan for ensuring that each program candidate will have high quality field experiences. How program candidates demonstrate the core expectations of effective school administrators during field experiences. How program candidates performance in high quality field experiences will be collected, evaluated and analyzed. Indicator 2.2: Field experiences are completed in settings relevant to program objectives and under the supervision and support of staff with the knowledge and skill necessary for the development of the candidate. The program describes the process or plan for: 1. How settings are selected, utilized, and monitored for each candidate s field experiences and internships relevant to program objectives for the development and practice of candidate skills that represent the full spectrum of school communities in multiple contexts; 2. Selecting and training individuals who supervise and support candidates during their field experiences; 3. How candidates receive feedback on their progress through field experiences and internships, including strategies for improvement; and 4. How remediation will be determined, administered, and monitored for program candidates who are not proficiently progressing in field experiences and internships. Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS-2016 4 Page

Standard 3. Program Effectiveness The program supports continuous improvement that is sustained and evidence-based and that evaluates the effectiveness of its candidates and completers. Indicator 3.1: The program routinely and systematically examines candidate and completer performance and impact. 1. The program describes its continuous improvement process for the annual review and analysis of aggregated data it will collect on program candidates and program completers, including: Program candidates field experience performance evaluations in demonstration of FPLS Number and percentage of program completers who complete the program and are placed in school principal positions Results from program completers performance evaluations required under s. 1012.34, F.S. Impact that program completers have on student learning as measured by the formulas pursuant to s. 1012.34(7), F.S. Performance results and retention rates of classroom teachers at schools of program completers Other data results under consideration by the program. 2. The program describes how it will utilize the analysis of aggregated data and determine areas of need or areas for growth for consideration for program improvement. Indicator 3.2: The program uses results of data collection to enhance program elements and capacity for impacting p-12 student learning. The program describes: 1. The process it will use for examining aggregated data analyses of program candidate and program completer performance and impact to identify and drive decisions for programmatic enhancements and improvement. 2. Strategies for involving program completers, other school personnel, employers, community agencies, business representatives, and other stakeholders in the program evaluation process. 3. Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders who will be involved in the decision-making process for determining the enhancement of program elements and capacity for impacting p-12 student learning, including how stakeholder input will be used. SCORING GUIDE Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS-2016 5 Page

Each indicator shall receive a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable based on the narrative description and documentation in the folio. The indicator ratings are as follows: Acceptable = A The evidence presented in the folio is clearly described and in alignment with the indicator. The narrative is well-articulated, realistic, and contains all required elements. Documentation is complete. Unacceptable = U The evidence presented in the folio is incomplete, not clearly described or is not in alignment with the indicator. The narrative or supporting documents do not address or satisfy the described elements. OVERALL RATING SUMMARY FOR INDICATORS STANDARD 1 INDICATOR 1.1 INDICATOR 1.2 INDICATOR 1.3 STANDARD 2 INDICATOR 2.1 INDICATOR 2.2 STANDARD 3 INDICATOR 3.1 INDICATOR 3.2 Enter an A or U for each indicator based on the rating scale above. SUMMATIVE RATING The results of the ratings for all indicators within each standard will determine the summative rating: Full Approval Program has earned acceptable for all indicators. Denied Program has earned unacceptable on one or more indicators. Effective Date: Rule 6A-5.081, F.A.C. Form SP IAS-2016 6 Page