TESTS FOR HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION 1. RAPID TEST 2. 50:20 DOMINANCE TEST 3. PREVALENCE TEST

Similar documents
Figure 2. Key to the forested vegetation types of Nova Scotia

Open File Report Ext

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Eastern Mountains and Piedmont

Nova Scotia Forest Inventory Based on Permanent Sample Plots Measured between 1999 and 2003

What is a Wetland? Common Wetland Names. Wetlands: Ecotones between Upland and Aquatic Systems. Matthew J. Gray University of Tennessee.

Wet Coniferous Forest Group

Update on the National Wetland Plant List

Routine Wetland Determination

Wetland Identification and Plant Community Assessment Techniques and Skills. Presented by: Mark West West Environmental, Inc.

2015 Wisconsin Envirothon KEY Forestry Exam

WETLAND SITE INDEX FOR BOTANICAL STUDIES Martin C. Michener Normandeau Associates, Inc. 25 Nashua Rd. NH 03102

S.R. 430, Segment 250 Offset 0000, Greenfield Township Wetland Delineation

8) Which of the following species is best adapted to poorly drained sites? a) Bur oak b) Eastern red cedar c) Black ash d) Yellow birch

Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands

Refers to the series of changes that every community undergoes over long periods of time

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks:

Proposed Canso Spaceport

Legend FIGURE 2 ENLOW FORK RESTORATION SITE. ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY MAP DtF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA REFERENCE

Landowner: PRE/POST Treatment Assessment Tally Sheet. Area: Prism Plot BAF = 2 Assessor: Stocking Plot Radius = 1.36 m (or 1/1736th ha) Date: # Plots

In this presentation we are going to talk about monitoring, measuring and the quantification of carbon stocks in tropical peatland forests.

P.E.I. Public Forests

Cedar Forest Group. Eastern white cedar Balsam fir / Stair-step moss

Wetland Delineation. Richard L. Darden, Ph.D. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District October 3, 2012 BUILDING STRONG

Forest Ecosystem Classification for Nova Scotia Part I: Vegetation Types (2010)

Open Woodland Group. (n = 60)

Buck Hill Management Area RI Department of Environmental Management Burrillville, Rhode Island

DEP Bordering Vegetated Wetland (310 CMR 10.55) Delineation Field Form

SITE ANALYSIS. 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation: A predominance of plants that are typically adapted for life in saturated soils.

Enhanced Wetland Mapping on the Loomis State Forest A report to Northwest Ecosystem Alliance

Wetland Observations

Change Monitoring Inventory

Nova Scotia Forest Inventory

RIS Swedish National Forest Inventory. RIS MI Swedish Forest Soil Inventory. Integrated Monitoring - IM

A program of the WSMD within the ANR. Determines the condition of Vermont s wetlands

Use scientific names of plants.

2017 Cannonsville Tornado Salvage

Appendix C. Methodology

Spruce Pine Forest Group

We greatly appreciate your assistance withy thyis project. If you have any questions do not hesitate to call at or

unit area = sample area

Vermont Department of Forest, Parks and Recreation And UVM Extension

Cooper Creek ECS Ecological Departure Analysis

Appendix A. Wetland Determination Forms and Site Photography

38. VEGETATION Introduction. Vegetation Cook Inlet Drainages

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region

Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program, BBNEP, and the Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions, MACC. The BBNEP and MACC have been

Avian Habitat Considerations in Northern Hardwoods Silviculture

Ground Sampling Quality Assurance Standards

Spruce Hemlock Forest Group

MANAGED FOREST LANDS STEWARDSHIP FORESTRY PLAN

6. Riparian Plant Community Structure

OTTER PONDS DEMONSTRATION FOREST FOREST ECOSYSTEM CLASSIFICATION. Forestry Division, Truro

Shrubs & Trees for Wildlife

Iron County Land and Water Conservation Department

Old Field Forest Group

Supplement of Daily burned area and carbon emissions from boreal fires in Alaska

Mixedwood Forest Group

environmental excellence and sustainability C reating Biodiversity in the Oil Sands A Case Study Chris Fordham December 5, 2012

Coastal Forest Group

TUNDRA AND FOREST FIRE TRIANGLE

Characteristics of Snags Used by the Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) in Old-Growth Red and Eastern White Pine Forests of Temagami, Ontario

Wetland Determination/Delineation Whaley-Sharp Property Tippecanoe County, Lafayette, Indiana Patriot Project No E

Habitat as a predictor of Warbler usage.

Delineating Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act

FORM 2: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987) COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Appendix E Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation Report, JYL 2008

Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Interim Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual

Grand Blanc High School Nature Center Forestry Unit By: Stephen Applebee

SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report

Prince Edward Island Public Forests

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Arid West Region

3. The poor condition of Connecticut s forests in the late 1800s and early 1900s helped spur the conservation movement in CT.

CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.

GSP Monitoring Team Baseline Data Report

TREPASSEY S SITKA SPRUCE

Intolerant Hardwood Forest Group

Forensic Forestry Reading the Land

Global Warming. Potential Impact on the Tree species of P.E.I. Department of Environment, Energy and Forestry William M.

Unless otherwise noted, these field data were collected on February 28, 2017.

Ordinary High Water Mark

Objective Based Vegetation Management (OBVM) Program Overview. Division of Habitat and Species Conservation Wildlife and Habitat Management Section

UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY

Design With Nature: How to Create an Old Growth Forest. Chuck Pettis Earth Sanctuary

Please see the pages below for full description of each tree!

Bin Xu NSERC Industrial Research Chair for Colleges, Peatland Restoration NAIT

Conservation of Biological Diversity

Flight 93 National Memorial Reforestation Project (Phases I-IV)

Wetland and Waterbody Delineation PORT OF EAST ST. LOUIS NORTH CAHOKIA TRACT SAUGET, ILLINOIS. October Prepared for: TERRA ENGINEEIRNG, LTD.

Variable Method Source

Managing Your School Forest

Effects of Simulated MPB on Hydrology and Post-attack Vegetation & Below-ground Dynamics

Stand Dynamics and Health. Helping Your Woods Grow. For most of us this is our goal. Traditional Land Knowledge. Forest Function and Wildlife Habitat

Review of Natural Environment Existing Conditions, Johnston Road Study Area

Density Management in Pacific Northwest forests

Critical Areas Assessment Report: Wetland Delineation. Grandis Pond Blaine, WA. For: Blossom Management Corporation PO Box Bellingham, WA 98228

Soil Biodiversity and Chemistry Challenges to Reclamation in the Oil Sands

Succession in the Forest

Stand Initiation Stage: Single-Cohort stands

California Tahoe Conservancy Monitoring Plan

Upstream Oil and Gas Spills to Boreal Wetland Environments Best Practices and Evolving Tools

Transcription:

TESTS FOR HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION 1. RAPID TEST 2. 5:2 DOMINANCE TEST 3. PREVALENCE TEST

TESTS FOR HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION 1. RAPID TEST NO YES Carex trisperma, cinnamon fern, black spruce, larch cottongrass, tussock sedge, black spruce, larch REQUIREMENT: THE COMMUNITY DOMINANTS ARE OBL OR W

5:2 Dominance Test Assesses Dominance in Plant Community By Layers or Strata * only gets data on vascular plants..ie. not mosses or lichens (as with Rapid Test)

5:2 TEST is carried out at points along the delineated line. Recommended that minimum of two points are assessed for large wetlands. Paired points should not be far from the flagged line. Each point is waypointed for reference

CIRCULAR PLOTS 1. Herb Stratum = 1.5 m radius 2. Shrub Stratum = 5m 3. Tree Stratum = 1m note: Plots must make sense: Upland tree or shrub plot cannot go too near delineated line

Assesses Dominance in Plant Community By Layers or Strata TWO STRATA: Herbs and Trees THREE STRATA: Herbs, Shrubs and Trees

METHOD Divide Community into woody and non-woody plants HERBS are all Herbaceous plants PLUS all woody plants under One Metre in height

METHOD Divide Community into woody and non-woody plants Now you quantify this Herb stratum by estimating percent cover of the most common plants

PERCENT COVER OF HERB STRATUM 9% Cinnamon fern 25% Carex trisperma N.B. Total combined covers of 115% or even 14% not uncommon since layers and leaves overlap

METHOD 5:2 Identify the Shrub Stratum = All Woody plants > 1m in height and < 8 cm in stem diameter at breast height (DBH at 1.4m)

METHOD 5:2 Estimate and record the percent cover value for all common shrubs = The Shrub Stratum and so on.. the Tree Stratum

HERB LAYER Cinn. Fern TW Aster 3 Seed Sedge Velvetleaf blueberry Sheep- Laurel TOTAL 5% Threshold 2% Threshold % COVER 95 18 25 1 2 15 75 3

HERB LAYER Cinn. Fern TW Aster 3 Seed Sedge Velvetleaf blueberry Sheep- Laurel TOTAL 5% Threshold 2% Threshold % COVER 95 18 25 1 2 15 75 3 DOM yes no no no no

SHRUB LAYER Canada Holly Red Maple False Holly % COVER 21 14 6 TOTAL 5% 2%

TREE LAYER Red Maple White Pine TOTAL % COVER 25 5

COMMUNITY HERB Cinnamon Fern SHRUB Canada Holly W TREE Red Maple TOTAL DOMINANTS Percent, W or OBL VEG HYDROPHYTIC 3 3 of 3 1% YES

HERBS WET DRY Cinnamon fern 4 Broom Crowberry 45 UPL Labrador tea 1 W Lowbush Blueberry 15 Sheep-Laurel 5 1 Teaberry 1 TOTAL 82 13 5 Threshold 41 51.5 2 Threshold 16 2 DOM 1 UPL DOM 2 n/a n/a HYDRO YES NO

SHRUBS WET DRY NS (US) Rhodora 3 (w) Huckleberry 2 5 (u) False Holly 3 (O) Wild Raisin 5 (O) Jack Pine 5 U TOTAL 64 17 5 Threshold 32 8.5 2 Threshold 12.8 3.4 DOM 1 DOM 2 DOM 3 n/a U HYDRO YES YES

TREE WET DRY Jack Pine 5 U Red Maple 3 TOTAL 8 5 Threshold n/a 4 2 Threshold n/a 1.6 DOM 1 n/a UPL DOM 2 n/a

COMMUNITY HERB SHRUB WET DRY UPL SHRUB SHRUB TREE TREE PERCENT > or = HYDRO VEG n/a n/a n/a 1% YES U UPL 5% NO

COMMUNITY HERB SHRUB WET DRY UPL SHRUB SHRUB TREE TREE PERCENT > or = HYDRO VEG n/a n/a n/a 1% YES U UPL 5% NO * Extreme difference here between Upland and Wetland: Granite rock vs. peat. Note how the 5:2 errs on HYDROPHYTIC Diagnosis

PREVALENCE INDEX USES 1) Standard Practice = a follow up test if the 5:2 is negative (ie. says veg not hydrophytic) 2) An Additional Test in cases where Dominants are all but subordinates suggest Upland (U) or Wetland (W) tendencies (cf. Wakeley and Lichvar, 1997. Wetlands 17:31-39)

5:2 Insights 1) 5:2 Ignores all non-dominants. Strata with 2 s at 3% each and 2 Us at 1% is scored as.. 2) After 5:2 selects dominants, their relative abundances (e.g. 8% Huckleberry, 2% Labrador tea) are forgotten

Prevalence Index is a weighted average method. It applies a sliding weight, a factor, to the summed cover values of all plants in particular moisture classes (e.g. OBL, W, etc.). *All species having any cover are used in the calculation. Factors range from 1 for OBL to 5 for UPL The Products, B, (summed covers x factors) is divided by the sum of all plant cover values, A. If the Index is equal to or less than 3, the vegetation is HYDROPHYTIC

Prevalence Index on Upland at Extreme Site GROUP Species Absolute Total Factor Product cover group cover (1-5) OBL none 1 W none 2 Lowbush 15 blueberry Sheep- 1 laurel Teaberry 1 Huckleberry 5 Wild raisin 5 Red maple 3 48 3 144 U Jack pine 1 1 4 4 UPL Broom crowberry 45 45 5 225 SUM A=13 B=49 49/13= 3.9

This site has: 1 U, 5, and 1 W dominant. 6 species of a total of 7 = or wetter, 6/7x1= 83%. Soil is a fibrous peat over granite but it is not a histosol (A1) No evidence of soil saturation. No hydrology indicators. Note Bracken and dead Jack pines (not used in calculation)

Prevalence Index on Peaty Upland..close but.. GROUP Species Absolute Total Factor Product cover group cover (1-5) OBL none 1 W Labrador Tea 1 Black Spruce 5 15 2 3 Sheep- 8 laurel Teaberry 5 Lowbush B. 2 False Holly 3 Mt. Ash 1 Fir 15 16 3 48 U Bracken 2 2 4 8 SUM 195 59 59/195= 2.9

Morphological Adaptations Eastern Hemlock U Evidence of seasonal high water through site and long-term response of most hemlock by making STILT rooting systems Document that most trees show this THEN recalculate the 5/2 with hemlock as a based on morphology

LASTLY..Using your plant list as a Secondary Indicator of Hydrology. The neutral test. This uses the list of dominant plants over all strata BUT drops the s Then if the remaining W and OBL dominants outnumber U and UPL, this passes the Neutral Test and you check the NEUTRAL box under Secondary Indicators of Hydrology