Frequently Asked Questions about the Cohesive Strategy and the. Northeast Regional Action Plan

Similar documents
Western Governors Association Policy Resolution Wildland Fire Management and Resilient Landscapes A. BACKGROUND

The National Fire Plan: Managing the Impacts of Wildfires on Communities and the Environment. An Overview and Look Ahead

Community Wildfire Protection Plan Development Process for Santa Barbara County

Central Oregon Cohesive Strategy Initiative

A Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Insert signature Block

Executive Summary Part 1: National Challenges - Managing Wildfire on the National Landscape... 3

Western Governors Association Policy Resolution Western Agriculture A. BACKGROUND

State and Private Forestry Programs

Bastrop County, Texas Wildfire Mitigation Study

US Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Resources for Private Forest Landowners in New Mexico

Forest Service 2014 Wildland Fire Risk Management Protocols. Forest Service Wildfire Response Protocol

MODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

NDSU - North Dakota Forest Service North Dakota Cooperative Fire Protection Initiative Budget Request

Appendix O: Policies and Initiatives. Appendix O provides the MCG-approved policies and initiatives for inclusion in the Implementation Plan.

Southern Interagency. Wildland-Urban Interface Strategy. A five to ten year wildland-urban Interface Strategy for the South.

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

For Earth Day, the Swinomish tribe gathered together to pick up trash within their community. Photo credit: Flickr/NWIFC

PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO

Issues, Challenges and Opportunities at the Wildland- Urban Interface

Anchor Forests: Improving forest ecosystem function through balanced Social, Economic, and Ecologic Management

Land vested in Her Majesty in the right of Ontario.

COMMUNITY FOREST TRUST COMMUNITY FOREST TRUST

Sitgreaves Communities Wildfire Protection Plan

2002 SUMMARY REPORT Oregon Department of Forestry Tribal/State Agency Government-to-Government Relations

The province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.

Interior Lumber Manufacturers Association

Assistant Deputy Minister, Regional Operations South Area

April 27, Dear Chairwoman Murkowski and Ranking Member Udall:

A National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy:

Nebraska. State & Private Forestry Fact Sheet. Investment in State's Cooperative Programs: Key Issues:

State and Private Forestry Fact Sheet

IN THE EARLY 1600s, when Europeans began settling

Aggressive Prescribed Fire Program Reduces Wildfire Severity: An Eglin Air Force Base Case Study

Applegate Adaptive Management Area. Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest

Forest Stewardship Program National Standards and Guidelines

Sitgreaves Communities Wildfire Protection Plan

GREAT BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM

Statement of. Dale Bosworth, Chief U.S. Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture

MAY 17,

MEMORANDUM. Governor John Hickenlooper & Members of the Colorado General Assembly

USDA defers to the Department of the Interior regarding the impact of the legislation on the Department s programs and authorities.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

WRP Webinar on Wildfire & Forestry

Wildland Fire Leadership Council

Characterizing the Fire Threat to Wildland Urban Interface Areas in California

International Wildland Fire Summit Paper #1

Subtitle E Delaware River Basin Conservation

FLORIDA S FOREST ACTION PLAN NATIONAL PRIORITIES. 1. Conserve and Manage Working Forest Landscapes for Multiple Values and Uses

The National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy: Northeast Regional Risk Analysis Report

Planning for Growth and Open Space Conservation

APPENDIX 5: PIONEER/VOLCANO PLAN- NING UNIT COMMUNITY FEATURES

Charter: Great Lakes Region Aquatic Habitat Connectivity Collaborative

Memorandum of Understanding On Policy Principles For

FAO STRATEGY FOR FORESTS AND FORESTRY

INTERIOR S PLAN FOR A COORDINATED, SCIENCE-BASED RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON OUR LAND, WATER, and WILDLIFE RESOURCES

Chapter 11 Intergovernmental Coordination and Implementation

SOUTHWEST FOREST HEALTH AND WILDFIRE PREVENTION ACT OF 2004

Vegetation and Fuels. Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy

Table of Contents. Introduction 3. Forest of the West 4. Key Findings: Priority Issues Across the West 5. Western Strategies 9

LCC Council Charter. Introduction

4 ESF 4 Firefighting

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION WHITE PAPER ENSURE SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY OF DECISIONS. Revised October 28, 2008

A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. Wildland Urban Interface Wildfire Mitigation Desk Reference Guide

A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. Wildland Urban Interface Wildfire Mitigation Desk Reference Guide

Wildland Fire Management Strategy

The Chesapeake Bay Program Biennial Strategy Review System: A Guide to Your Quarterly Progress Meeting

2017 REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS Forest Restoration and Wildfire Risk Mitigation Grant Program

Application of the Montreal Process Criteria & Indicators at National and Sub-national Scales

NESST- National Ecosystem Services Strategy Team

MAY 3, 2006 CONCERNING. The Need for Proper Forest Management on Federal Rights of Way to Ensure Reliable Electricity Service

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

S E C T I O N. six. Environment

Draft Updated Navajo and Apache County - Sitgreaves Communities Wildfire Protection Plan

Water Needs and Strategies for a Sustainable Future

Statement for the Record. Forest Service. United States Department of Agriculture. For the United States House of Representatives

Cross Boundary work is Key Collaborative restoration treatments across ownership boundaries are critical in creating fire adapted communities

FACT SHEET: BLM, USFS Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Effort

Frequently Asked Questions about the DOI Reorganization

New Mexico. State & Private Forestry Fact Sheet. Investment in State's Cooperative Programs: Key Issues:

Full Document, go to:

Forest Service Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Spring Mountains National Recreation Area

The U.S. tradition of conserving fish, wildlife, habitats,

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Creating Resilient Rural Communities March 8, 2017 Res/Con

Glossary of Commonly Used Terms and Acronyms in Public Lands Management and Related Legislation

Grant Narrative for Forest Stewardship and Urban and Community Forestry Programs [State] Division of Forestry FY 2011

SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION SOCIETY S 2018 CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS

THE PATH FORWARD I. VISION

Photo courtesy of George Wilmot

State and Private Forestry Fact Sheet. Investment in State's Cooperative Programs:

Grandfather Restoration Project

Determine Certainty Program Framework of a Market Based Conservation Initiative for Longleaf Pine Habitat Improvements in Eastern North Carolina

NEWAYGO COUNTY Community Wildfire Protection Plan 2010 Edition

Karner Blue Butterfly

ALDO LEOPOLD WILDERNESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Accomplishment Report Providing scientific leadership to sustain wilderness

Anyone can come in for technical assistance. NRCS and its partners use the CTA program to provide technical assistance to: farmers, ranchers, local

Transcription:

Frequently Asked Questions about the Cohesive Strategy and the Northeast Regional Action Plan What is the Cohesive Strategy? The National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy (Cohesive Strategy) is being developed in response to requirements of the Federal Land Assistance, Management, and Enhancement (FLAME) Act of 2009, and its development is being directed by the Wildland Fire Executive Council (WFEC) and overseen by the Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC). The Cohesive Strategy is a collaborative process with active involvement of all levels of government and non-governmental organizations, as well as the public. The goal is to find national, all-lands solutions to wildland fire management issues. You have had one or more employees serving as members of either the Regional Strategy Committee or one of our Working Groups (see enclosure) over the last 3 years developing the reports for the Northeast. The Cohesive Strategy is being implemented in three phases, allowing stakeholders to systematically develop a dynamic approach to planning for, responding to, and recovering from wildland fire incidents. This phased approach was designed to promote dialogue between national, regional and local leadership. Phase I involved the development of two documents: A National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy and the Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement Act Of 2009 - Report to Congress. These documents provide the foundation of the Cohesive Strategy. In Phase II, regional assessments were completed to address the national goals and the needs and challenges found at regional and local levels. Regional Strategy Committees representing three regions of the country the Northeast, Southeast, and West examined the processes by which wildland fire, or the absence thereof, threatens areas, and issues that Americans value, including wildlife habitats, watershed quality, and local economies, among others. Phase III has involved taking the qualitative information gathered in Phase II and translating it into regional risk analysis reports that in turn has helped inform the development of management actions that are designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of wildland fire management programs and activities on the ground. Each of the three geographic regions of the country, (Northeast, West, and Southeast) is producing a Regional Action Plan which along with a national trade-off analysis, will be folded into a National Action Plan due in the Fall of 2013. 1

Once the strategy is finalized, it will be implemented across the country and overseen by the national Wildland Fire Executive Council (WFEC), which will establish a five-year review cycle to provide updates to Congress. Additional background on the Cohesive Strategy can be found at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov The Cohesive Strategy is not guidance and it is not policy, at least not yet, but it is more than a set of ideas. It is a description of the shared understandings about what we as a nation and region want with respect to wildland fire. Why do we need the Cohesive Strategy? Wildfires burn across landscapes without regard for political jurisdictions, property lines, or land management units. The effects of fire on wildlife, water, air quality, recreation, and communities extend far beyond the burn boundaries. Rural and urban economies depend on services generated by wildland ecosystems; most of those ecosystems depend on fire of appropriate timing and intensity but can be damaged by wildfires that burn outside the range to which they are adapted. Seldom can one landowner or manager alone adequately influence fire across the relevant landscape. That requires collaboration among many stakeholders with different authorities and resources whether it is implementation of a community wildfire protection plan or restoration of fire resilience to a watershed thousands of acres in size. Is the Cohesive Strategy a Policy? A set of ideas? Guidance? The Cohesive Strategy is not guidance and it is not policy, at least not yet. It is more than a set of ideas. It is a description of the shared understandings about what we as a nation want with respect to wildland fire. We want communities that are adapted to fire so that fire losses of life are as small as possible and people suffer few injuries or illnesses from being exposed to wildfire in or near their communities or while fighting fire. We want property and other community values-at-risk to be protected from wildfire. We also want to protect those wildland values important to communities that depend on fire. We want landscapes that are resilient and sustainable in terms of flows of services from fire dependent ecosystems. We want effective and efficient preparations for and response to fire that succeeds in preventing unwanted fires and quickly and safely extinguishing those that do start. The Cohesive Strategy also describes why we want those things and suggests in broad terms how we will proceed to accomplish them. In short, it is a strategy. 2

What is the Northeast Regional Action Plan? The Northeast Regional Action Plan details the goals, desired outcomes, investment options, outcome measures, and priority implementation actions for the Northeast Cohesive Strategy Region. These actions, as identified by the Northeast Regional Strategy Committee (RSC), will help guide all the partners in wildland fire management in the Northeast Region to make progress in achieving the overarching national goals: Restore and Maintain Landscapes, Fire Adapted Communities, and Wildfire Response. How was the Northeast Regional Action Plan developed? As a starting point, the Northeast Region developed key actions under each option based upon feedback received from stakeholders during Phases I, II, and III of the planning process. The actions listed are key actions that are intended to be implemented during the next five years, and that will provide the most benefit to the region over that time period. The Action Plan describes the scope of the actions, the tasks associated with the actions, the lead and coordinating groups that will be implementing the actions, and the timeframe in which it is expected that the actions will take place. Who developed the Northeast Regional Action Plan? The Action Plan was developed, with input from the public and stakeholders in the wildland fire management community, by the Northeast Regional Strategy Committee, which is comprised of representatives from the following agencies and organizations: Department of the Interior US Fish and Wildlife Service US Geological Service National Park Service Bureau of Indian Affairs Department of Agriculture US Forest Service Fond du Lac Indian Reservation Intertribal Timber Council Northeastern Area Association of State Foresters (20 Northeast and Midwest States, and District of Columbia) International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) National Association of Counties (NACO) (Lake Co., MN) 3

Will the Cohesive Strategy and Northeast Regional Action Plan affect how funds are allocated and spent? Not at this time. While more funding is not anticipated in the near term, the Cohesive Strategy is focused on making current investments more effective and working within current programs to get better results. Emphasis is on collaboration is especially essential during times of economic stress. How will the Northeast Regional Action Plan affect my organization or agency s workload? Addressing wildland fire is not simply a land management, fire operations or wildland-urban interface concern it is much larger and more complex. Each agency and organization represented by the Northeast RSC has the authority, responsibility, and autonomy to develop and implement their own policies. But long-term success can only be achieved through a unified, collaborative and focused effort of all. The implementation actions expressed in this plan, while voluntary in nature, represent the collective work of the Northeast RSC and stakeholders to identify the most important actions needed to make progress toward achieving a more efficient, effective, and collaborative wildland fire management strategy for the Northeast. In addition, leads and collaborators have been identified for each of the actions and task under each goal and option. It is important to note that not every agency and organization in the Cohesive Strategy partnership will have to work on every action and task. With each partner doing their share we can make significant progress in advancing wildland fire management in the Northeast as outlined in the regional action plan. How can we tell if the Cohesive Strategy as represented by the Northeast Regional Action Plan makes a difference? Sound scientific methods and performance measures will be used to monitor and evaluate actions that implement the strategy. Evaluation results will be used to guide action needed to make adjustments in policy or programming and to learn what works and develop best practices. Promising success stories from projects across the country showing evidence of significant impacts on landscapes, communities and fire response will be available to others to help them design and manage their own efforts to collaborate with others implementing the Strategy. How will the CS partners in the Northeast coordinate actions, set priorities, and monitor progress? One of the key actions identified in the Northeast Regional Action Plan is the need to establish and expand the membership of the current Northeast Regional Strategy Committee (RSC) as a more permanent coordinating entity. It is the belief of the Northeast RSC, that this action alone will greatly increase the efficiency and effectiveness in addressing many of the wildland fire management 4

challenges identified in the Northeast Regional Action Plan. Currently in the Northeast Cohesive Strategy Region, there is no single entity in place that has the responsibility for governing and coordinating all the wildland fire management organizations, policy direction, and operational activities envisioned under the Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. This action involves the formation of a wildland fire regional strategy committee through an agreement to oversee, coordinate, and monitor the implementation of the Cohesive Strategy across the 20 states of the Northeast and Mid-west U.S. How will this new NE Regional Strategy Committee relate to the other existing wildland fire coordinating groups such as Compacts, EACG, the State Forest Fire Supervisors Committee, etc.? In addition to the current member agencies and organizations represented on the NE RSC, these and other interested groups would be participating members of the NE RSC with the purpose of coordinating policies and procedures to improve resource sharing efficiencies. Their current charters and wildland fire management responsibilities would not change. The purpose of this coordinating committee is to provide strategic oversight and participating agency coordination to ensure policy coordination, accountability, facilitate sharing of resources, and effective implementation of the Cohesive Strategy and related long-term strategies to address wildfire preparedness and suppression, hazardous fuels reduction, landscape restoration and rehabilitation of wildlands, and assistance to communities. More information is always available on www.forestsandrangelands.gov. 5