Workshop Results WP 3 ACTIVITY 11. SUSTAINABLE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO AND. Kalevala national district. Kostomuksha urban district

Similar documents
ACTIVITY 4. UTILITIES NETWORK ANALYSIS IN THE PILOT TERRITORIES: HEATING AND ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE

Promoting green economy in the Northern Peripheral Regions: cooperation between science, business and NGOs

Welcome to Kouvola! A Future Wooden City or a Future Wooden Network Town of Bigger and Smaller Villages

Development of a Continued Education Programme for EU-Enterprises in Kostomksha CEPEK. nortech OULU

SAM - Sustainable Acceptable Mining - Sustainability project with a multi-science approach

Bragança Declaration «Face the challenge of climate change: adaptation for future generations»

20 Oct Our future - make it work. The National Development Plan 2030: What the Future Holds. Diagnostic Report of June 2011.

2 nd Joint Working Group Meeting Bulgaria the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-border cooperation Programme

STRATEGY FOR ARMENIA

Development and Spatial Planning

Goals and objectives in the most recent action plan; The Copenhagen Climate Plan

Strategy plan Nordic Forest Research (SNS)

#SystemTransformation

CFS contribution to the 2018 High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development global review

RESOURCE WISDOM Regional Operating Model in the Estonian Context. Workshop Tallinn, Estonia June 9 th, 2017

Strategy Analysis. Chapter Study Group Learning Materials

The Vermont Climate Economy Initiative Ideas to Advance Vermont s Climate Economy

The pink lines detail the updating made. Dim 1 Dimension 2 Dimension 3

Reporting on progress made since 2009 on the attainment of the Amsterdam Goals

Proactivity and responsible operating methods. City of Tampere environmental policy 2020

Overview Fourth Call Approved projects

WTP 2035 DRAFT STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

Council Improvement Plan

COUNTRY PRESENTATION on REORIENTING TVET POLICY TOWARDS EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FIJI

VIETNAM GREEN GROWTH STRATEGY

Managing Green Infrastructure as a Municipal Asset

EUTRAIN Europe Neighbourhood Cooperation Countries (incl. Russia, CIS, Black Sea, Balkan States) 3rd Regional Workshop Moscow, Russia

Western Governors Association Policy Resolution Western Agriculture A. BACKGROUND

OUR CITY, OUR FOOD Strengthening Food Systems through Local Action

Country profile. More from less material resource efficiency in Europe overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries.

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Green enterprize Innovation and Development Project

VICE MINISTER FOR TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Carbon Neutral Helsinki 2035 Action Plan. Summary

Smart Food and Agribusiness. WP700 - User Community Involvement & Dissemination

Community Vision and Values Survey Results September 2010

BRICS LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTERS DECLARATION

Sustainable lifestyles to inform development & masterplanning

Resolution of the Riigikogu General Principles of Climate Policy until 2050

Measuring and Valuing Natural Assets: Ecosystem Services. Steve Polasky University of Minnesota & Natural Capital Project

BUSINESS PLAN Preparing for the Future

Workshop Key Messages. German Habitat Forum Berlin, June 1-2, 2016

Description of the assignment: Land-Use Planning and Environmental Management Specialist

Greater Norwich Economic Strategy Summary

The Central European Initiative for the promotion of bioenergy in Central, East and South-East Europe

NATURE SCORE CARD. Funding & resources

Overview of the economic diversification policies (focus on rural tourism) of the Republic of Serbia

Community role of civil society in the household waste management and urban farming

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ENERGY 1

Lithuanian Energy Institute, PP9

Hawaii Cattlemen s Council White Paper Regarding Agricultural Land Use Policy and Practices

2009 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT for the establishment of the TENNESSEE FARMLAND LEGACY PARTNERSHIP

17th GTI Consultative Commission Meeting June : Moscow, Russia Venue: Borodino Hotel GREATER TUMEN INITIATIVE

L 337/36 Official Journal of the European Union

A Better Life in Rural Areas

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

FOCAC: CHINA AND AFRICA BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE

It s about your success

Climate-Neutral Berlin 2050

Synthesis of Key Findings. The Foundation for Science and Technology at The Royal Society 13 July NEA Main Features

The Smart Specialisation Platform on Energy

Protocol on Sustainable Transport to the Framework Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians

Many traditional farmers provide environmental

Country Report Myanmar

Keep The Scenic Rim Scenic 19 th March 2013

Kazbegi Municipality LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Kazbegi Local Action Group

The Role of Transportation in Rural Wellbeing: Recent Activity by TRB

Processes in communities

Qatar 2 nd National Voluntary Review on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Agenda, 2030

FOREST EUROPE Structures, Procedures and Work Modalities

WP 2.1. State of the art of public procurement policy and practices in the Baltic Sea Region

TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA. Corporate Strategic Plan Update. November 21, Presented by:

ANNEX 7. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 66 of 8 July, 2005,

Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria for Destinations (GSTC-D) version November Preamble

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

READY MED FISH. WP4 Definition of new professional profiles on the multi-functionality of fisheries

The Dorset Trees, Woods and Forest Strategy

City of Edmond Department of Public Works STRATEGIC PLAN FY2017/18. Public Services that Work!

Sustainability Focus to community Active without violence Non-Partisan Natural harmony Independence Effective

EX-ANTE EVALUATION and STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for the HUSKROUA ENI CBC PROGRAMME

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Second Opinion on City of Lund s Green Bond Framework

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 1

Memorandum of understanding between the City of Oulu, the Municipality of Tromsø, the Council of Oulu Region and the Troms County Council

Xueman Wang, Program Coordinator, GPSC World Bank

DECLARATION. Sustainable Land Use and Soil Protection Joining Forces for Nature, People and the Economy

ENPI-FLEG II - outcomes and results

NESST- National Ecosystem Services Strategy Team

Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Northern Periphery Programme

DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR WOOD HARVESTING PLANNING IN RUSSIA

THE INVESTMENT PLAN FOR EUROPE

Green Hotelling A Feasibility Study in the Hellenic Island of Skyros. FIG Working Week 2012

Strategic Planning: Navigating the Road Ahead

Land Use Policies and Sustainable Development in Developing Countries; Examples from LUPIS Floor Brouwer (LEI, Wageningen UR)

Moving towards a low carbon tourism destination in Bhutan

Envisioning sustainable and healthy food supply chain: participatory backcasting approach

Latvian Presidency Outcome Paper In the field of Territorial Cohesion and Urban Matters

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Iskandar Malaysia at a Glance

Intergovernmental Eleventh Regional Environmentally. Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia. 2-5 October 2018 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Transcription:

Workshop Results WP 3 ACTIVITY 11. SUSTAINABLE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO AND BACKCASTING Envisioning the future Kostomuksha urban district Kalevala national district

Place: NorTech, Oulu. Finland Date: 22nd of August 2013 Participants: NorTech Oulu team: Eva Pongracz, Niko Hänninen, Elena Fedorova, Victor Pavlov, Jutta Petäjäjärvi KarRC Karelia: Evgeniy Zirnel

Workshop Goals The main goal of the workshop was The Envisioning the Future for GreenSettle project pilot territories: Kostomuksha city and Kalevala district. The NorTech team and Evgeniy Zirnel the expert from KarRC were discussing the current state of pilot territories and drawing future scenarios. Those scenarios are intended to be used in creating of a roadmap for sustainable spatial planning and development, which can be used for future improvement of pilot territories. To create a joint understanding the following questions were on the table: What are the key aspects for spatial development in Kostomuksha and Kalevala? What ecological, cultural, social, economic and business administration aspects affect future scenarios? What are the pessimistic, realistic and optimistic scenarios for these two cities?

Workshop structure The Workshop was structured in 4 phases: Phase 1 NorTech team introduction of Backcasting concept for developing strategies towards sustainable spatial development. Phase 2 Joint presentation of findings on current state of Kostomuksha urban distric. Local situation analysis. Followed by the exercise of Envisioning the Future of Kostomuksha urban district and drawing the pessimistic, realistic and optimistic scenarios for city development. Phase 3 Joint presentation of findings on current state of Kalevala national district. Local situation analysis. Followed by the exercise of Envisioning the Future of Kalevala national district and drawing the pessimistic, realistic and optimistic scenarios for the district development. Phase 4 Final discussion and sketching of mutual functional vision of a desirable future (by 2050) for both pilot territories.

Phase 1 During the first phase Victor Pavlov from NorTech team presented the new approach to the Russian expert of how to apply scenario methodologies like Backcasting to develop strategies towards more sustainable spatial development. Backcasting is a scientific approach to develop a path towards a realistic desirable future for a given theme. In our case the theme is Sustainable spatial development of pilot territories. It consists of the following ABCD steps: A Gain awareness of the ecological and social systems the GreenSettle project operates within, based on an understanding of the principles for sustainability. From this understanding, create a vision of what Envisioned future for pilot territories would look like if it operated within these principles; B Undertake a baseline assessment of today s current reality. Note where violations of the principles for sustainability occur and identify project s, in our case pilot territories assets; C Create solutions to the issues discovered in the B step without technological, political (local administration and Russian federal laws) or other constraints this is brainstorming part. If all project partners can think of measures to achieve these. D Decide on priorities. Prioritize the actions developed during C by asking: 1) Does this action move us in the right direction (toward development of sustainability principles)? 2) Can those actions and solutions be built upon in future? 3) Does this action bring an acceptable financial, ecological and/or social return on investment? In the discussion after Victor s presentation it was define that the biggest challenge for using this approach in Russia will be the possibility of connecting the experts, researchers, local administration and policy-makers on real topics and joint goals. Even more important that the long-term commitment is needed in order to fulfill sustainability requirements on project territories.

Phase 2 NorTech presented the findings which were made by the team based on the analysis of all reports which were published by Finnish and Russian sides since the project had started in 2011. All the available resources and potentials were evaluated for Kostomuksha city but the most important ones such as Land use, Infrastructure, Waste management, Recourses management, Energy sector and Individual and Community well-being have been discussed and evaluated more detailed. SWOT analysis of the spatial development for Kostomuksha urban district was present by Victor Pavlov by the end of discussion. The last part of phase two was devoted to the exercise of Envisioning the Future of Kostomuksha urban district and drawing the pessimistic, realistic and optimistic scenarios for city development.

Aspects Pessimistic Realistic Optimistic Land Use Kostomuksha urban district Future Scenarios Legal restrictions remain working. Thus, the city cannot utilize its land use potential Land market is developed. The restrictions partially remain. Some parts of the areas are open for exploitation. Rural settlements potential is utilized: i.e. recreational objects No land use restrictions. Land market is well-developed. Housing construction and lease are common practice. The city plan is changed functionally: i.e. parkland is free and available for public. Plural sidewalks, court games, nature conservation areas with vegetation, shaded picnic areas and resting points, waste bins system and illumination are developed well and implemented. Bicycle lanes are well-thought and function Infrastructure The state of the roads remains the same and deteriorated. The ore dressing and processing enterprise changed its policy and does not help to improve the infrastructure. The financial problem exists. No funding is provided to reconstruct/repair the motor roads. The deterioration and failures are wide spread The ore dressing and processing enterprise declares it is aimed to support reconstruction. But in fact it does it partially. The interest of the stakeholders are discussed in constant dialogue to find some balance. Railway road infrastructure between Finland and Russia is built. Airport is modernized and air connection is organized. New motor road are build. The ore dressing and processing enterprise invests in infrastructure renewal. Tax potential of the territory facilitates the infrastructure development. The infrastructure functions well. The energy self-sufficiency is achieved. The individual housing construction is coupled with infrastructure development. ICT is applied. Rest areas and public parking territories are organized. Logistics Centre is in operation Waste and Resource Management The pilot projects did not go well. The waste management system remains almost the same. Only some fractions are separated: e.g. mercury lamps Only some of the local resources are in use: e.g. timber waste, energy waste The waste management is gradually improving. The related Finnish experience contributes well. Basic waste utilization knowledge is provided to the city public. L&T company is present in Kostomuksha. The local resources (especially, forest and recreational resources) are more in use. Apart from mercury and forestry waste utilization, biofuel potential is realized. All the factions are sent for recycling facilities. The Kostomuksha city is used as pilot territory for Republic of Karelia waste management and resource efficiency improvement. The population has adapted easily to new habits related to waste separation Local resources usage is well-developed. All of the local resources are used properly and benefit city community. Touristic potential is fully realized.

Energy The deterioration and failure level of the networks and capacities is increased. Lack of funding for the reconstruction is common. The Severstal holding stops heat supply. The city is dependent on world oil market and oil deliveries The fuel used in energy has become more renewable. CHP unit based on biofuel is in operation. The appropriate energy equipment is partially changed. Energy supply operates in more environment friendly manner. City has become energy independent on the ore dressing and processing enterprise All the networks are changed, some new parts are constructed. Renewable fuel is a common practice. Energy efficient and saving technologies are implemented Individual and Community Well-being Differentiation of society is increased. The offices of university representatives are closed Training of needed specialists is partially carried out. Collaboration with Russian and Finnish universities did step forward. New moll is constructed. The city now has Centre area that is youthfriendly. New educational institutions and hobby and leisure centres are available Higher quality of life is achieved. New educational Centre is created. Training of specialists according to the city demand is conducted. Distant training is organized. Collaboration projects with Russian and Finnish universities are welldeveloped. Knowledge-based technology center (based on the industrial know-how and arranged in old factory buildings), where educational and training exercises and research is carried out, is organized. Youth stays in the city due to job opportunities and many free time activities presence. The Kostomuksha city has converted into eco-city. ICT is applied at information points in the city. Science Museum of regional importance to attract tourists is built

Phase 3 This phase concentrated its attention on analysis of the spatial development of the Kalevala national district. It had been structured in the same format as phase 2. All the available resources and potentials were evaluated for Kalevala National District but the most important ones such as Land use, Infrastructure, Waste management, Recourses management, Energy sector and Individual and Community well-being have been discussed and evaluated more detailed. SWOT analysis of the spatial development for Kalevala national district was present by Victor Pavlov by the end of discussion. The last part of phase 3 was devoted to the exercise of Envisioning the Future of Kalevala national district and drawing the pessimistic, realistic and optimistic scenarios for district development

Aspects Pessimistic Realistic Optimistic Land Use Kalevala national district Future Scenarios Legal restrictions still exist Land market is developed. The restrictions partially remain. Some parts of the areas are open for exploitation. Rural settlements potential is utilized: i.e. recreational objects There are no restrictions. Developed land market exists. There is construction and land lease developed Infrastructure The motor roads are not improved. No new roads are built At least gravel roads are built in the district. More projects of improvement appear. Small aviation is developed Well-organized structure of asphalt roads function. The roads include rest areas, additional information signs and guideboards for drivers in two languages (Russian and English). All the settlements of the district are connected via good motor road network Waste and Resource Management The situation is kept the same. There is still low level of development Simple waste management system is organized. Local waste recycling facilities are created Wild and clean environment, as touristic product, is realized on bigger scale among Russian tourists from megalopolises and European tourists Waste utilization facilities are placed in between the four bigger places (i.e. Kostomuksha, Segezha, Kem, Belomorsk) Fish farming development takes place. Forest resources are better utilized. Organic farming is organized. The recreational potential of the territory is fully realized

Energy The situation is kept the same. There is still low level of development Community energy self-sufficiency is partially developed. Private households use local resources, especially solid biofuels Electricity supply works reliable. Local energy resources are used. Energy selfsufficiency of the district is fully developed. Energy efficient and saving technologies are implemented Individual and Community Well-being The situation is kept the same. There is still low level of development Gradual improvement of the situation. New hobby clubs are created. New kindergartens, schools are built. Community people have access to basic education of high level. Distance learning, international experience exchange is organized All the settlements of the Kalevala district are converted into eco- and ethno-communities. New jobs are offered. There is well-developed education, health and social infrastructure. Local identity and culture are maintained

Phase 4 The final phase was devoted to joint discussion and to envisioning the future of 2050 for Kostomuksha urban district and Kalevala national district To achieve mutual functional vision of a desirable future (by 2050), climate-neutral economy, which includes efficient and clean resource use, preserving aesthetics, respecting cultural heritage, maximizing the wellbeing and prosperity of the people in pilot territories

The team after the workshop had been completed

Thank you all! This project is co-funded by the European Union, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Finland