Results: 6 th Annual Railroad Report Card 2016

Similar documents
Results: 6 th Annual Railroad Report Card 2015

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CLASS I RAILROADS

Revenue Freight Traffic Statistics for the Major North American Railroads. Weekly Railroad Traffic

Class I Railroad Statistics

THE BELT RAILWAY COMPANY OF CHICAGO FREIGHT TARIFF 6004-E (CANCELS FREIGHT TARIFF BRC 6004-D)

HONDO RAILWAY, LLC (HRR)

Rail Service 101. MEDC Spring Conference June 10, 2014

The Indiana Rail Road Company

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

Open Top Opportunities. Business Development Design Product for Rail Transport. Brent Lichty Union Pacific RR. Lindy Pope Norfolk Southern RR

Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway A Genesee and Wyoming Company

Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway A Genesee and Wyoming Company

RAIL PRICE ADVISOR. The Rail Intelligence Newsletter. AAR Historical Rail Rate Changes are Misleading

Allan Tedrow Sales Executive McCormick Construction Automation by Brad Lansink COMCO Controls

Labelmaster Dangerous Goods Symposium

Midwest Association of Rail Shippers Winter Meeting January 14, 2015

INDIANA HARBOR BELT RAILROAD

Soy Transportation Coalition Tom Maze Transportation Seminar March 28, 2014

CGR TARIFF NO 01b CANCELS CGR TARIFF NO. 01a IN ITS ENTIRETY. CG Railway, Inc.

Analyst: Meilin C. Pierce Spring Recommendation: Hold Target Stock Price (12/31/2016): $120

Union Pacific Railroad & BNSF Railways HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT

Status of US Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Planning

UNION RAILROAD COMPANY

PRIVATE EQUIPMENT. Tariff 6.

D E C AT U R I N T E R M O D A L R A M P O P P O R T U N I T Y F I N A L R E P O R T A U G U S T 3 1,

KYLE Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services. Customer Switching.

PRIVATE EQUIPMENT. Tariff 6.

CGR TARIFF NO 01b Supplement 2 CANCELS CGR TARIFF NO. 01b, Supplement 1 IN ITS ENTIRETY. CG Railway, Inc.

Intermodal Is Leading The Way June 2013

LEVERAGING BIG DATA TO MANAGE LOGISTICS

SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT TARIFF

MARCH 14 TH 2017, 2:00 PM ET WITH

Chapter 3 Missouri Freight System

NEBRASKA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads May Summary

GRENADA RAILWAY LLC FREIGHT TARIFF GRYR 8008 (NEW)

Fertilizer Outlook & Technology Conference A Modern Infrastructure for Modern Agriculture November 15, 2016

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. New Jersey Statewide Strategic Freight Rail Plan

Transportation and Logistics Roundtable Series

PACIFIC HARBOR LINE, INC.

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads June Summary

New England Railroads The Next Generation. New England Railroad Club Presentation to UMass Amherst November 29, 2018

CTCO Chicago Transportation Coordination Office. Sandhouse Gang Presentation February 21, 2013

Reducing Air Emissions the Smart Way An Introduction to Railroad Participation in EPA s SmartWay Transport Partnership

KANSAS CITY TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC

Monitoring the Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System Grain Monitoring Program Report for: November 2017 Release Date: December 22, 2017

RICHMOND PACIFIC RAILROAD CORPORATION

TEXAS ROCK CRUSHER RAILWAY COMPANY

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

PORT HARBOR RAILROAD

TEXAS, GONZALES & NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Frequently Asked Questions

Transportation options exist on West Coast to increase soybean, meal export competitiveness

WESTERN GRAIN ELEVATOR ASSOCIATION Ste Main St. Telephone: (204) WINNIPEG, Manitoba Fax: (204)

August CLOSER LOOK SERIES: Covered Hoppers SAMPLE

RICEBORO SOUTHERN RAILWAY (RSOR)

Efficiencies of Unit vs Manifest Models

PALMETTO RAILWAYS (PR)

Section 3: Railroads and Anhydrous Ammonia Transport. Lesson Goal

ATW (Cancels All Prior Versions)

Transportation. TOP JOBS FOR VETERANS IT Specialist Operations & Facilities Manager Customer Service Manager/Rep Skilled Laborer & Trades Mechanic 20%

kansas logistics park

Rail Fast Facts For Operations Number of freight railroads 25 Freight railroad mileage 2,552

CENTRAL MAINE & QUEBEC RAILWAY FREIGHT TARIFF CMQ 6004 DEMURRAGE RULES AND CHARGES STORAGE RULES AND CHARGES

SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE RAILROAD FLAGGING SERVICES

SIDNEY & LOWE RAILROAD

TieReport # 12. Assessment of Concrete Tie Life on U.S. Freight Railroads

Chapter 2 Rail Transportation

USDA s Perspective on Agricultural Transportation Priorities

THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DEMURRAGE RULE

A Prescriptive Analysis of the Indiana Coal Transportation Infrastructure

TARIFF BPRR SWITCHING CHARGES

KICK-OFF MEETING April 2, 2014 Topeka, Kansas

Innovative Truck/Rail Transport and Future of Trucking and Agriculture Shipping. Presented by Donna Lemm

AKMD Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services. Customer Switching.

Rail Industry Overview and Trends

Record of Professional Development Hours

COLUMBUS AND GREENVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY DEMURRAGE TARIFF 6000 AND STORAGE RULES AND CHARGES APPLYING AT ALL POINTS SERVED BY

CENTRAL NEW YORK RAILROAD CORPORATION

BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD. DOCKET NO. EP 724 (Sub-No. 4) UNITED STATES RAIL SERVICE ISSUES PERFORMANCE DATA RERPORTING

Agricultural Products Unit Train Facility Design Guidelines

Commercial Fleet Integration Program Western Canada Grain 2017

RARITAN CENTRAL RAILWAY, LLC

KANSAS & OKLAHOMA RAILROAD, INC.

Audit of Producer Cars. Audit and Evaluation Services Final Report Canadian Grain Commission

Assessing the Importance of Freight Transportation to U.S. Agriculture

BNSF Railway. Moving you Forward

USDA Acreage & Stocks Report

Availability Time: The time the equipment is grounded and available for pick up by the customer.

Public Meeting. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Section 106 Consultation. Preferred Alternative Selection November 29, 2018

BRG RATE TARIFF 8001

AUGUST CLOSER LOOK SERIES: Open Top Hoppers SAMPLE

INDIANA HARBOR BELT RAILROAD

AKMD Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services

CWRY Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services. Customer Switching.

Monitoring the Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System Grain Monitoring Program Report for: May 2018 Release Date: June 29, 2018

Commodity Preparedness and Incident Management Reference Sheet Pre-Incident Planning and. Preparedness. 1.0 Pre-Incident Planning and.

UNIT TRAIN SERVICES. Tariff 5.

South-Eastern Railroads

Transcription:

1255 SW Prairie Trail Parkway Ankeny, Iowa 50023 515-727-0665 www.soytransportation.org Funded by the soybean checkoff Results: 6 th Annual Railroad Report Card 2016 OVERALL RANKINGS (2016): Overall % or from 2015 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 5% 2.) Norfolk Southern Railway 15% 3.) CSX Transportation 1% 4.) BNSF Railway 7% 5.) Canadian National Railway 0.3% 6.) Kansas City Southern Railway 24% 7% OVERALL RANKINGS (2015): 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 2.) BNSF Railway 3.) CSX Transportation 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway 5.) Canadian National Railway 6.) Kansas City Southern Railway OVERALL RANKINGS (2014): 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 2.) Norfolk Southern Railway 3.) CSX Transportation 4.) Canadian National Railway 5.) Kansas City Southern Railway 6.) BNSF Railway OVERALL RANKINGS (2013): 1.) CSX Transportation 2.) Union Pacific Railroad 3.) Norfolk Southern Railway 4.) BNSF Railway 5.) Canadian National Railway 1

6.) Kansas City Southern Railway OVERALL RANKINGS (2012): 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 2.) BNSF Railway 3.) CSX Transportation 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway 5.) Canadian National Railway 6.) Kansas City Southern Railway On Time Performance 1.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), rate the following seven Class I railroads in their ability to provide on time service. 2016 (rank) 2015 (rank) 2014 (rank) 2013 (rank) 2012 (rank) 1.) Norfolk Southern Railway 7.14 5.64 (5 th ) 5.67 (4 th ) 7.67 (3 rd ) 6.75 (5 th ) 2.) Union Pacific Railroad 7.07 7.39 (1 st ) 6.52 (1 st ) 7.78 (2 nd ) 7.81 (1 st ) 3.) Kansas City Southern Railway 7.00 4.83 (6 th ) 5.75 (2 nd ) 6.50 (5 th ) 6.67 (6 th ) 4.) Canadian National Railway 6.64 6.57 (2 nd ) 5.69 (3 rd ) 6.00 (7 th ) 7.17 (4 th ) 5.) BNSF Railway 6.57 6.56 (3 rd ) 3.53 (6 th ) 7.25 (4 th ) 7.57 (2 nd ) 6.) CSX Transportation 6.00 6.23 (4 th ) 5.56 (5 th ) 7.83 (1 st ) 7.50 (3 rd ) 4.77 4.40 (7 th ) 2.94 (7 th ) 6.20 (6 th ) 5.64 (7 th ) 2.) When provided an estimated time of arrival or delivery from a railroad, within which timeframe will that arrival or delivery typically occur? NOTE: Union Pacific had an average score of 8-12 hrs. Canadian National, CSX, Kansas City Southern Railway, Norfolk Southern and BNSF Railway each had an average score between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs. Union Pacific Railroad had the highest score. Canadian Pacific had the lowest score. 2016 Rankings 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 8-12 hrs 2.) Canadian National Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 3.) CSX Transportation Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 4.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway (Tie) Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 6.) BNSF Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs Between 12-24 hrs and >24 hrs 2015 Rankings 1.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 2.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 3.) BNSF Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 4.) CSX Transportation Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 5.) Canadian National Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 6.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs Between 12-24 hrs and >24 hrs 2

2014 Rankings: 1.) Canadian National Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 2.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 3.) CSX Transportation Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 5.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 6.) BNSF Railway Between 12-14 hrs and > 24 hrs Between 12-14 hrs and > 24 hrs 2013 Rankings: 1.) CSX Transportation Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 2.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 3.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 4.) Canadian National Railway Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 5.) BNSF Railway Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 6.) Canadian Pacific Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 7.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 2012 Rankings: 1.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 2.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 3.) Canadian National Railway Between 4-8 hrs and 8-12 hrs 4.) BNSF Railway and Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway (Tie) 6.) CSX Transportation Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs Between 8-12 hrs and 12-24 hrs Customer Service 1.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), rate the following seven Class I railroads in their ability to provide quality customer service. 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 6.67 7.28 (1 st ) 6.67 (1 st ) 7.50 (2 nd ) 7.94 (1 st ) 2.) Kansas City Southern Railway 6.50 5.33 (5 th ) 6.17 (3 rd ) 6.50 (5 th ) 5.86 (6 th ) 3.) CSX Transportation 6.10 6.25 (3 rd ) 6.07 (4 th ) 8.00 (1 st ) 6.82 (2 nd ) 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway 6.00 5.33 (6 th ) 6.29 (2 nd ) 7.44 (3 rd ) 6.75 (3 rd ) 5.) BNSF Railway 5.77 6.69 (2 nd ) 4.39 (6 th ) 6.76 (4 th ) 5.93 (5 th ) 6.) Canadian National Railway 5.75 5.67 (4 th ) 6.00 (5 th ) 6.20 (6 th ) 6.31 (4 th ) 4.77 4.13 (7 th ) 3.13 (7 th ) 6.09 (7 th ) 5.53 (7 th ) 2.) When a service problem arises, within which timeframe will that problem typically be resolved to your satisfaction? NOTE: Union Pacific had an average score of 4-6 hrs. CSX Transportation, Norfolk Southern Railway, BNSF Railway, Canadian National Railway, Canadian Pacific Railway, Kansas City Southern Railway had average scores between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs. Union Pacific had the highest score. Kansas City Southern Railway had the lowest. 2016 Rankings: 3

1.) Union Pacific Railroad 4-6 hrs 2.) CSX Transportation Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 3.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 4.) BNSF Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 5.) Canadian National Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 6.) Canadian Pacific Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 7.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 2015 Rankings: 1.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 2.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 3.) BNSF Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 4.) CSX Transportation Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 5.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 6.) Canadian National Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 2014 Rankings: 1.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 2.) Canadian National Railway Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 3.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 4.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 5.) CSX Transportation Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 6.) BNSF Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 2013 Rankings: 1.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 2.) Canadian National Railway Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 3.) BNSF Railway Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 4.) CSX Transportation Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 5.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 6.) Canadian Pacific Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 7.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 2012 Rankings: 1.) Canadian National Railway Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 2.) CSX Transportation Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 3.) Union Pacific Railroad Between 2-4 hrs and 4-6 hrs 4.) Kansas City Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 5.) Norfolk Southern Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 6.) BNSF Railway Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs Between 4-6 hrs and More than 6 hrs 3.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), do you have around the clock access (including weekends and holidays) to a customer service official who is able to resolve problems to your satisfaction? 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 6.92 7.33 (1 st ) 6.45 (3 rd ) 7.71 (2 nd ) 7.33 (1 st ) 2.) Norfolk Southern Railway 6.23 5.25 (5 th ) 7.07 (1 st ) 7.11 (3 rd ) 6.58 (3 rd ) 4

Costs 3.) BNSF Railway 6.10 6.25 (2 nd ) 5.33 (6 th ) 6.76 (4 th ) 6.15 (4 th ) 4.) Kansas City Southern Railway 6.00 4.83 (6 th ) 5.80 (4 th ) 5.67 (7 th ) 4.75 (7 th ) 5.) CSX Transportation 5.50 5.64 (3 rd ) 6.83 (2 nd ) 7.83 (1 st ) 6.70 (2 nd ) 6.) Canadian National Railway 5.33 5.31 (4 th ) 5.64 (5 th ) 6.00 (5 th ) 5.83 (5 th ) 4.00 3.50 (7 th ) 3.33 (7 th ) 5.73 (6 th ) 5.43 (6 th ) 4.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), rate the websites of the seven Class I railroads in providing costs and marketing information (tariffs, pricing, etc.). 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 7.67 7.47 (1 st ) 7.38 (1 st ) 7.65 (2 nd ) 8.38 (1 st ) 2.) BNSF Railway 7.21 7.44 (2 nd ) 6.79 (3 rd ) 7.06 (3 rd ) 7.50 (2 nd ) 3.) CSX Transportation 6.55 6.46 (3 rd ) 6.80 (2 nd ) 7.71 (1 st ) 6.55 (4 th ) 4.) Norfolk Southern Railway 5.92 6.00 (4 th ) 6.65 (4 th ) 6.44 (5 th ) 6.67 (3 rd ) 5.) Canadian National Railway 5.80 5.67 (5 th ) 6.00 (5 th ) 6.60 (4 th ) 6.38 (5 th ) 6.) Canadian Pacific Railway 3.75 4.15 (7 th ) 3.56 (7 th ) 5.20 (7 th ) 4.60 (7 th ) 7.) Kansas City Southern Railway 3.67 5.33 (6 th ) 4.14 (6 th ) 6.17 (6 th ) 5.67 (6 th ) 5.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), rate the websites of the seven Class I railroads in providing operations-related information (tracking, billing, rail car profiles, etc.). 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 7.71 8.24 (1 st ) 7.67 (1 st ) 7.83 (1 st ) 7.81 (1 st ) 2.) Norfolk Southern Railway 7.36 6.62 (4 th ) 6.71 (2 nd ) 7.67 (2 nd ) 7.00 (3 rd ) 3.) BNSF Railway 6.85 7.06 (2 nd ) 6.63 (3 rd ) 7.53 (3 rd ) 7.62 (2 nd ) 4.) CSX Transportation 6.73 6.69 (3 rd ) 6.47 (4 th ) 7.43 (4 th ) 7.00 (3 rd ) 5.) Canadian National Railway 5.20 5.79 (5 th ) 6.06 (5 th ) 6.00 (5 th ) 6.38 (5 th ) 6.) Canadian Pacific Railway 4.55 4.77 (7 th ) 3.75 (7 th ) 5.55 (6 th ) 5.21 (7 th ) 7.) Kansas City Southern Railway 4.00 5.00 (6 th ) 4.67 (6 th ) 5.17 (7 th ) 6.25 (6 th ) 1.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), do you feel the rail service your company receives is commensurate with the cost of that service? 1.) Norfolk Southern Railway 6.00 4.69 (6 th ) 5.82 (2 nd ) 5.50 (4 th ) 5.33 (5 th ) 1.) Kansas City Southern Railway (Tie) 6.00 6.50 (1 st ) 5.57 (3 rd ) 5.50 (5 th ) 5.00 (6 th ) 3.) Union Pacific Railroad 5.73 6.24 (2 nd ) 6.05 (1 st ) 5.61 (3 rd ) 6.06 (1 st ) 4.) Canadian National Railway 5.56 4.92 (5 th ) 5.50 (4 th ) 5.40 (6 th ) 5.67 (2 nd ) 5.) CSX Transportation 5.00 5.33 (4 th ) 5.27 (5 th ) 5.71 (2 nd ) 5.60 (3 rd ) 6.) BNSF Railway 4.36 5.60 (3 rd ) 3.74 (6 th ) 5.75 (1 st ) 5.50 (4 th ) 3.92 3.08 (7 th ) 2.94 (7 th ) 4.45 (7 th ) 4.86 (7 th ) 2.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), are rail service costs clearly explained to you? Is there transparency in the railroad s pricing mechanism? 1.) Norfolk Southern Railway 6.29 4.79 (3 rd ) 5.82 (1 st ) 5.70 (6 th ) 5.67 (5 th ) 2.) CSX Transportation 5.80 4.69 (5 th ) 5.27 (4 th ) 6.86 (1 st ) 5.82 (4 th ) 3.) Union Pacific Railroad 5.53 5.67 (2 nd ) 5.43 (2 nd ) 6.31 (2 nd ) 6.44 (2 nd ) 4.) Canadian National Railway 5.33 4.79 (4 th ) 5.38 (3 rd ) 6.20 (3 rd ) 6.00 (3 rd ) 5

5.) Kansas City Southern Railway 5.25 4.25 (6 th ) 5.13 (5 th ) 5.60 (7 th ) 5.20 (7 th ) 6.) BNSF Railway 4.86 5.88 (1 st ) 5.05 (6 th ) 5.71 (5 th ) 6.57 (1 st ) 4.08 3.62 (7 th ) 3.69 (7 th ) 5.82 (4 th ) 5.29 (6 th ) 3.) Accessorial charges Do you feel railroad accessorial charges are legitimate and used for those purposes advertised by railroads, or do you feel they are simply another avenue for generating additional revenue (1 = Another avenue for revenue; 10 = Legitimate)? 1.) Union Pacific Railroad 4.31 4.00 (2 nd ) 5.16 (2 nd ) 4.76 (4 th ) 5.13 (3 rd ) 2.) BNSF Railway 4.00 4.38 (1 st ) 3.74 (6 th ) 4.75 (5 th ) 4.71 (5 th ) 3.) Norfolk Southern Railway 3.33 3.62 (5 th ) 5.71 (1 st ) 5.33 (2 nd ) 5.17 (2 nd ) 4.) CSX Transportation 3.30 3.92 (4 th ) 5.15 (3 rd ) 5.33 (2 nd ) 5.18 (1 st ) 5.) Kansas City Southern Railway 3.25 2.60 (7 th ) 4.50 (4 th ) 5.60 (1 st ) 3.60 (7 th ) 6.) Canadian National Railway 3.00 4.00 (3 rd ) 4.38 (5 th ) 4.00 (6 th ) 4.77 (4 th ) 2.42 3.00 (6 th ) 2.86 (7 th ) 3.58 (7 th ) 4.29 (6 th ) 4.) On a scale between 1-10 (one = worst; ten = best), is your company provided adequate notification when price increases occur? 1.) Norfolk Southern Railway 6.64 5.57 (4 th ) 6.65 (1 st ) 5.78 (6 th ) 6.58 (2 nd ) 2.) Union Pacific Railroad 6.56 6.76 (1 st ) 6.52 (2 nd ) 6.89 (1 st ) 6.94 (1 st ) 3.) CSX Transportation 6.27 5.92 (2 nd ) 6.27 (3 rd ) 6.43 (2 nd ) 6.18 (5 th ) 4.) Kansas City Southern Railway 6.00 4.50 (7 th ) 4.86 (6 th ) 5.50 (7 th ) 6.40 (3 rd ) 5.) BNSF Railway 5.50 5.73 (3 rd ) 4.95 (5 th ) 6.13 (3 rd ) 6.29 (4 th ) 6.) Canadian National Railway 5.30 5.53 (5 th ) 5.93 (4 th ) 6.00 (4 th ) 5.69 (7 th ) 5.00 4.64 (6 th ) 3.88 (7 th ) 5.91 (5 th ) 5.93 (6 th ) Rail Customer Profile 1.) Which of the seven Class I railroads did your company utilize over the past 12 months? BNSF Railway Kansas City Southern Railway Canadian National Railway Norfolk Southern Railway Canadian Pacific Railway Union Pacific Railroad CSX Transportation Survey respondents utilized, on average, 3 of the 7 Class I railroads over the past 12 months. 2.) Which agricultural commodities and products were transported by railroads on behalf of your company over the past 12 months? Soybeans and soy products (including soybean meal, soybean oil, and biodiesel) Corn and corn products (including ethanol) Wheat and wheat products Other agricultural products Survey respondents shipped, on average 2.6 of the 4 stated agricultural categories listed over the past 12 months. 6

3.) On average, at your individual shipping location(s), how many options for rail service are available to you (include short line and regional railroads, if applicable)? 1 2 3 or more Survey respondents, on average, had 1.6 options for rail service at individual shipping locations. 7