Concrete Framing systems. Design choices. Basic flavors

Similar documents
Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

Pro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004

eight plates and grids APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

eight plates and grids Plates, Slabs & Grids Plates, Slabs & Grids Term Project plates horizontal plane, rigid slabs thin, flat, rigid

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #2

Structural Tech Report #2 Pro Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Eric Alwine Structural Option George Read Hall The University of Delaware Dr. Boothby Technical Assignment #2 October 31, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

SIGNAL HILL PROFESSIONAL CENTER Manassas, Virginia Morabito Consultants EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

These systems are evaluated on the basis of serviceability issues such as:

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

twenty two concrete construction: flat spanning systems, columns & frames ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

U.S. Pharmacopeia Headquarters Consolidation. Rockville, MD

Structural Technical Report #2 By Robert Whitaker

twenty two concrete construction: flat spanning systems, columns & frames Reinforced Concrete Design Reinforced Concrete Design

Crossroads at Westfields Building II

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #2 October 31,

Campus Square Buildings C & D Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA

twenty two concrete construction: flat spanning systems, columns & frames Reinforced Concrete Design Reinforced Concrete Design

Technical Report #2 10/26/06

Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Dr. Boothby, AE Faculty Consultant. Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel

Structural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA

Dead Loads (psf): Concrete Floor Slab on Metal Deck 45 psf Mechanical and Ceiling 7 psf Miscellaneous 5 psf Exterior Wall 80 psf

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

Thesis Proposal 12/13/06

two structural systems, planning and design Structural Organization Bearing Walls Structural Components

two structural systems, planning and design Structural Organization Structural Components Bearing Walls

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

PRESENTATION PLAN A MODEL COMPARISON FLOOR CONSTRUCTION

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

Shoring and Reshoring Fundamentals

Nasser Marafi. Alternate Floor Systems. Pro Con Structural Study of. Technical Report 2. Center & Facility Service Building

Presentation Overview

Kaleida Health Global Heart and Vascular Institute University at Buffalo CTRC/Incubator. Buffalo, New York. Technical Report #2

This report investigates alternative floor systems for the building. A brief summary of each system is as follows:

Jonathan R. Torch Technical Report 2 Columbia University. Technical Report 2. Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

THESIS PROPOSAL. christopher m. shipper

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Structural Option April 7 th, 2010

one structural behavior, systems, and design ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2015 lecture

TYPICAL BEARING WALL FRAMING Joints in plates must be offset by 24 min.

one structural behavior, systems and design Course Description Course Description Syllabus & Student Understandings statics mechanics of materials

FDA CDRH Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland. Executive Summary: Timothy Mueller Structural Option Walter Schneider

Matthew Kutzler. Structural Option Spring Buildings C and D Campus Square, Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA

Structural Comparison between Pan Joist Concrete and Steel Frame Systems for UMCP Student Housing Building B

Technical Report 1 Bed Tower Addition at Appleton Medical Center Appleton, WI

COURTYARD INFILL STRUCTURE DESIGN

fourteen Structural Planning 1 APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

STEEL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium

Drexel University Race Street Dormitory REVISED THESIS PROPOSAL Doug Tower Structural Advisor: Kevin Parfitt 2/7/07

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

S p a c e e l e v a t o r. Structure selection and design Prof Schierle 1

Jackson Crossing Located in Alexandria, VA. Technical Report 1 Michael Bologna

Technical Report 3. Alyssa Stangl Structural Option Advisor Dr. Linda Hanagan L A J O L L A C O M M O N S P H A S E I I O F F I C E T O W E R

TECHNICAL REPORT II STRUCTURAL STUDY OF ALTERNATE FLOOR SYSTEMS

Temporary Structures. Form Materials and Accessories ATCE--II. Advanced Topics in Civil Engineering Form Materials and Accessories ATCE-II

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 3 10/17/2014. PSUAE Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004

Chuck Brooks, P.E., P.Eng. C&S Engineers

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 2

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Comparative Study on Post - Tensioned and Reinforced Concrete flat Slab Systems for a Multistory Building

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

Executive Summary. Non-Composite Steel system 2- Way Flat Concrete Slab Wood Beam with Form Deck Pre-Cast Hollow Core Plank

Lecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems

ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERISITY THESIS PROJECT

DECK DAMAGE AND PENETRATIONS

POST TENSIONED SLABS. Imagineering the possibilities

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

Interior Hangers. Application

Thesis Proposal Executive Summary Depth and Breadth Analysis

Best Buy Corporate Building D (4) Richfield, MN

Building Division Informational Handout

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Technical Report 2: Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Hershey Research Park Building One. Technical Report 2. Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan 10/12/12

TYPICAL BEARING WALL FRAMING

A MEDLEY OF PRECAST AND PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SYSTEMS

Software Verification

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Topic Outline. Two Stage Analysis Procedure: Podium Design. Part 2: Rigid Lower Portion Philip Miller, S.E. 2/8/2018

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

200 Minuteman Drive. New Design for Additional Floors and Vibration Sensitive Equipment. Brent Ellmann. Structural Option

Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab behavior. One-way slabs carry load in one direction. Two-way slabs carry load in two directions.

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

C H A N T I L L Y, V A

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Elevated Slab Sequence

Transcription:

Concrete Framing systems Design choices Site Cast Concrete gives a designer a lot of freedom in the design and construction of walls, columns and surface textures. When it comes to spanning, concrete offers the same one directional system types offered by timber, laminated wood, steel, and precast concrete, that is beam spanning from column to column with some form of joist or decking in between. This is enough for many designers, but some need the two directional spanning capacity that site cast concrete can offer. The following is an overview of concrete framing systems and some characteristics of each. Basic flavors All diagrams from Allen Architects Studio Companion Basically, there are 4 types of slabs an architect chooses from when considering a system for a project. Slabs are usually flat, can be reinforced to span one way or two ways. Their span usually depends on their depth, but there is a point where the extra concrete in the depth works against the slab due to its weight. Joist slabs usually can span farther and carry heavier loads because they eliminate concrete not contributing to the slabs strength. (hence the joists) 1

One way flat slabs The one way slab spans between beams or columns. It requires a structural bay (spacing between columns in both directions) that is within 20% of being square. It is usually used for light loading Span min 6 applications where it s thin structural depth Span max 18 gives a low floor to floor height. R.O.T. Slab depth 1/22th When heavily loaded it requires the beams below the slab, It is more desirable to NOT have these beams as they take additional 1/40th labor to form and pour. 25x25 6 40psf load about $13.80 per sq.ft. 25x25 6 125psf load about $17.20 per sq.ft. One way flat slabs w/slab bands Here the beams have been flattened out to reduce floor to floor depth. It still requires a structural bay (spacing between columns in both directions) that is within 20% of being square. It is usually used for light loading Span min 6 applications where it s thin structural depth Span max 18 R.O.T. Slab depth 1/22th gives a low floor to floor height. 1/40th When heavily loaded it requires the beams below the slab, It is more desirable to NOT have these beams as they take additional labor to form and pour. 15x15 40psf load about $13.36 per sq.ft. Joist Slab Joist band (beam) void Span min 12 Span max 45 R.O.T. Slab depth 1/18th 1/36th One way joist slabs To address heavier loading conditions, its necessary to remove the concrete that s acting as dead weight - working against the slab that comes along with an increase in the uniform thickness of a slab. This one way joist slab does just that, using prefab formwork set on a plywood deck voids are formed between the joists which make the slab lighter, and stiffer. The joists bear into beams (called bands) spanning from column to column. These bands give this system the ability to move columns off the grid, (as long as they still fall under the bands) allowing for more plan flexibility. 25x25 12 40psf load about $14.10 per sq.ft. 25x25 12 125psf load about $16.50 per sq.ft. 2

More on one way joist slabs The slab is formed with rented fiberglass forms to make the voids between the joists. These forms are available from 8 to 20 inch depths, and in 20 & 30 inch widths. The joists between the voids are usually 4 to 8 inches wide, and the slab above the voids is usually 3 to 4 1/2 inch thick. There is usually not much reinforcing in the slab, and not much in the joist, most of the steel is concentrated in the band carrying the joists. The void gives places for lighting, ducts are harder to place here because it is almost impossible to put a hole big enough for a duct through the joist band. You might guess this is a tough system to meet with partitions going perpendicular to the joists and curved partitions are also pretty difficult. 3

Magic disappearing beams! Here the beam and slab are partially integrated, the top reinforcing for the beam is placed in the slab Here the beam has become much wider, but also much thinner. It is more fully engaged with the slab to reduce floor to floor height Cast in place concrete is the only form of construction which can absorb primary spanning members into the slab without seriously affecting the beams performance. In this thicker two way slab, the extra formwork required for the slab band has been completely eliminated, fully absorbing the beam into the slab! Upside Down construction Most construction places load carrying elements below the source of the load, part of the structural hierarchy driven by gravity and the relative difficulty of designing and constructing tension based connections. Another unique capability of concrete construction is the relative ease with which supporting members can be constructed / connected above the source of the load. 4

Carpenter Center for Visual Arts Here, Architect Le Corbusier has placed the beam carrying the ramp above the ramp, using it as an integral railing Real efficiency! Using one act to complete two tasks! Span min 10 Span max 28 R.O.T. Slab depth 1/30th 1/45th Two way flat plate The two way flat plate is more efficient structurally for light loading situations. The big difference between it and the one way slabs with beams is that it s reinforced to span two ways. This is possible because the beams are developed within the slab and span across all columns It still requires a structural bay (spacing between columns in both directions) that is within 20% of being square. It is usually used for light loading applications where it s thin structural depth gives a low floor to floor height. As it reaches it s maximum span, there is more concrete needed in the beam strips, so the slab gets thicker. This also means there is more concrete in the center which is just acting as dead weight, working against the slabs efficiency! 25x25 9 40psf load about $12.85 per sq.ft. 25x25 10.5 125psf load about $13.85per sq.ft. 5

Two way flat slab with drop panels Span min 12 Span max 33 R.O.T. Slab depth 1/30th 1/45th The two way flat slab is more efficient structurally for heavier loading situations. The big difference between it and the flat plate is its extra shear resistance at the columns. Here the shear resistance is developed by adding extra slab thickness (and reinforcing) at the columns. This form of adding shear resistance is called shear or drop panels. They add significantly to the cost of formwork! Like the plate, it has beams are reinforced to span two ways. This is possible because the beams are developed within the slab and span across all columns It still requires a structural bay (spacing between columns in both directions) that is within 20% of being square. As it reaches it s maximum span, there is more concrete needed in the beam strips too, so the slab gets thicker. This also means there is more concrete in the center which is just acting as dead weight, working against the slabs efficiency! 25x25 10 40psf load about $13.30 per sq.ft. 25x25 10 125psf load about $14.55 per sq.ft. Two way joist slab...waffles anyone? Span min 15 Span max 55 R.O.T. Slab depth 1/24th 1/35th The two way joist slab, also called a waffle slab is most efficient structurally for heavier loading situations and longer spans in concrete. The magic of the waffle slab is that the extra depth of the slab which gives more span/load capacity does not create dead weight in the middle of the span. The waffles displace unemployed concrete making the slab lighter and much stiffer! It behaves a little like a space frame made of concrete. The best part is columns don t have to line up! This gives exceptional flexibility in column layout! 25x25 10 40psf load about $18.55 per sq.ft. 25x25 10 125psf load about $19.35 per sq.ft. More about Waffles The waffles are formed by placing fiberglass pans or domes on a plywood deck. The pans displace concrete leaving the void when they are stripped. Pans aren t usually placed near the columns or bearing walls to allow the concrete to fill in solid at columns and bearing walls, places of maximum shear transfer. Slab thickness above the pans is usually 4 to 6 inches The pans are usually rented, and come in standard heights from 8 to 24 inches deep and from 19 to 52 inch widths. This gives the engineer a joist width choice between 5 and 8 inches wide You can see one of the difficulties for an architect using this system, wall partitions that have to meet the slab can really only fall on the joists. This makes curved partitions very hard to build. 6

One Way slab 18 foot span 36 foot span 10 inches thick One Way joist slab 36 foot span 24 inches thick Two Way slab 36 foot span 26 inches thick Two Way joist slab 18 inches thick 7