NYSERDA CHP Assessment Report A S S E S S I N G T H E C H P P L A N T A T T O R E N C O N D O M I N I U M S

Similar documents
NYSERDA CHP Assessment Report A S S E S S I N G T H E C H P P L A N T A T C L A R K S O N U N I V E R S I T Y

NYSERDA CHP Assessment Report A S S E S S I N G T H E C H P P L A N T A T V A S S A R C O L L E G E

NYSERDA CHP Assessment Report A S S E S S I N G T H E C H P P L A N T A T C O - O P C I T Y - R I V E R B A Y

CLARKSON UNIVERSITY, DG/CHP SYSTEM NOTES

4C Foods Data Integrator Notes

University of Illinois at Chicago

Burrstone Energy Center, LLC, St. Lukes Hospital, Home, and Utica College Data Integrator Notes

Allied Frozen Storage Site - Data Integrator Notes

Arrow Linen: CHP Washes Away Energy Costs of Commercial Laundry

Hazel Towers Data Integrator Notes

Rochester Airport Data Integrator Notes

Schenectady Water Pollution Control Plant

Paper Number: DOE/MC/C-97/C0771. Title: Potential Markets for Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine Cycles. Authors: W.P. Teagan W.L. Mitchell

MONITORING AND DATA COLLECTION FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION/ COMBINED HEAT AND POWER (DG/CHP) SYSTEMS AT ALLIED FROZEN FOODS BROCKPORT, NEW YORK.

Lessons Learned from Continuous Commissioning of a LEED Gold Building in Texas

SMART URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS. Summary of the Final Report

ImprovIng energy efficiency with chp: how to evaluate potential cost savings

Combined Heat and Power Application

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE STUDY IN SUPPORT OF NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

CASE STUDY REPORT FOR DK HEAT RECOVERY INSTALLATION BURY BLACK PUDDING COMPANY. October 2014

Vassar College - Data Integrator Notes

Waypoints Sequence Extension API

CREATIVE ENERGY NES Building Compatibility Design Guide October 15

M&V Plan for DG/CHP System

Efficiency Maine Symposium Combined Heat & Power Portland, ME. Dan Kelley-Vice President. & Service Line Leader Portland, ME

Compactness ratio : 1.2. Openings ratio : 26% (thermic envelope / inhabitable area) Smaller is better 1.9 = bad < 0.8 = good

APPLICATION FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER INCENTIVES

National Grid USA Service Company. Impact Evaluation Of 2006 Design2000plus Custom Comprehensive Projects. Final Report

FOR. Burrstone Energy Center LLC. August Submitted to:

BEST4 Conference Nibsbest4 April 13-15, 2015

Energy Efficiency and Security: Still Important in a World With Low-cost Fuel. E360 Forum Chicago, IL October 5, 2017

ADVANCED ABSORPTION CHILLER CONVERTS TURBINE EXHAUST TO AIR CONDITIONING

Effective Energy Modeling WGBA Leadership Conference October 19, 2005

Project Proposal Proposal for Investigation of Alternative Systems

Gregory W. Stevens and Ronald K. Ishii, Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc.

BGE Smart Energy Savers Program Combined Heat and Power Program Manual

COLD ROOM: Medium Temperature (Chiller) For Meat Storage. LOCATION: Bangkok, THAILAND BY: EMERSON PARTNER+ PROJECT DESIGN GROUP

Energy Storage Buildings-to- Grid Applications

NATURAL GAS MARKETS, STRUCTURES, AND MECHANISMS

Ground-Coupled Heat Pump And Energy Storage

Addendum Gateway CHP Verification and Commissioning

Home. home. away from. Re-energizing the Ronald McDonald House New York City ALSO:

Roadmap to Distributed Generation: Innovative Tools for CHP Adoption Sam Witty, Gita Subramony, ERS

Economics of Cogeneration

Thermally Driven Cooling

SAMPLE MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION (M&V) PLAN

Clarifying the Fenestration Energy Performance requirement in the Ontario Building Code Supplementary Standard SB12

Anyone in There? Measuring Usage and ROI of Microsoft Lync Server for Upper Management

CHP Case Studies. Midwest CHP Application Center (MAC) .org (312) University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center UIC

2017 Seasonal Savings Evaluation

2. Chilled Water Storage: A 4.4-million gallon chilled water storage tank improves Cornell s ability to meet peak cooling needs.

A. Cornell s district energy systems include the following components:

Combined Heat and Power (CHP): Applications of Distributed Power

AEP Ohio. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) May 24 th, 2017 Steve Giles Vice President Alternative Energy Hull & Associates, Inc.

Author: Greg Lander For The New Jersey Conservation Foundation.

The Influence of Distributed Energy Resources on the Hourly Clearing Price of Electricity in a Restructured Market

Fortimo LED Strip 1150/1450mm 4400/5500lm 8XX HV/LV4F/B Preliminary Specification and Design-In Tips December 5, 2016

Fortimo LED Strip 1150/1450mm 2600/3250lm 8XX HV/LV4F/B Preliminary Specification and Design-In Tips December 5, 2016

Extending the CCS Retrofit Market by Refurbishing Coal Fired Power Plants

Brooklyn-Queens Demand Management

BUILDING FOR THE FUTURE

NORTH AMERICAN MONITORING OF A HOTEL WITH ROOM SIZE GSHPS

District Energy Centre

East Rochester School District East Rochester, NY

Noblehurst Dairy Linwood, NY

AAON. Energy and Economics

CEE NATIONAL MARKET TRANSFORMATION COMBINED HEAT & POWER. Gearoid Foley, Sr. Advisor DOE s Mid-Atlantic CHP TAP April 1, 2014

Modeling Hourly Electric Utility Loads in the Phoenix Area

6 Cost Analysis. Table 6.1 Initial System Costs

AC2 Evaporative Condenser. Monitoring Report: 1998 Cooling Season

Office Lighting: Title 24 & Technology Update

CPUC Self-Generation Incentive Program Fifth Year Impact Evaluation Final Report

Advanced Attestation and Recertification for Today s Organizations

Combined Heat and Power. Applications and Guidelines Jeffrey Ihnen, P.E.

Ultraflex MV2 Final Data Summary

Letters.org. RESIGNATION ACCEPTANCE LETTER. Included: Resignation Acceptance Letter

Actual Performance of CHP DG Systems Installed for Industrial Applications in California

Challenges in Archiving SharePoint documents to a file server / file share

Microgrid And Smart Grid Activities At SMUD

Fuel BTU Output. Electricity: 1 KW = 3,413 Btu/hr. Natural gas: 1 CCF = 100 Cu Ft = 1 Therm = 103,000 Btu's. Propane: 1 Gal Propane = 91,600 Btu s

SAP BUSINESSOBJECTS PLANNING AND CONSOLIDATION 10.0, VERSION FOR SAP NETWEAVER STARTER KIT FOR IFRS SP1. Simplified Configuration Description

U.S. Solar Market Insight TM

Pepsi Co. College Point, NY

Industrial Waste Heat Recovery

PACIFICORP: PRIVATE GENERATION RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR LONG TERM PLANNING

Making automatic calculation of the operation strategy in energypro

Energy Auditing for Schools. Maryland Energy Administration Eric Oliver, EMO Energy Solutions, LLC May 10, 2007

Electric Standard Offer Program

Integration of Ion Transport Membrane Technology with Oxy-Combustion Power Generation Systems

Impact Evaluation of National Grid Rhode Island s Custom Refrigeration, Motor and Other Installations

Building Operator Certification Level I

Energy & Financial Savings Analysis 12/01/10

SUSTAINABILITY An Energy & Emissions Case Study

Combined Heat & Power (CHP) in New Jersey

Statewide IECC Electricity Savings Report ( ), p.i. Disclaimer

Airport Engineering ATR-038. PG Binder Test Section Calgary International Airport Pavement Temperature Analysis 1998/1999 and 1999/2000 R&D PROJECT

Energy Conservation Pilot Program

Price to Compare (PTC) Sample Calculation DISCLAIMER

DESIGN SUSTAINABLE BUILDING WITH OPTIMIZED COMBINED HEATING, COOLING, AND POWER (CHCP) SYSTEM

Injection Molding Design Guidelines

Transcription:

NYSERDA CHP Assessment Report A S S E S S I N G T H E C H P P L A N T A T T O R E N C O N D O M I N I U M S October 9, 2013 Toren Condominiums

Toren Condominiums DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY Information contained on this web site is provided "as is," without warranty of any kind. In particular, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority ("NYSERDA"), its employees, officers, and members, and the State of New York, make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for a particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, downloaded computer software product, service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, downloaded computer software product, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to herein. NYSERDA, its employees, officers and members, and the State of New York, make no representation that the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, downloaded computer software product, or other information will not infringe on privately owned rights. DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY In no event shall NYSERDA, its employees, officers or members, or the State of New York be liable for any direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, special, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data, or profits, arising out of or in any way connected with the use or performance of this web site, the provision of or failure to provide services, or for any information, software, products, services, or graphics obtained through this web site, or otherwise arising out of the use of this web site, whether based on contract, tort, strict liability, or otherwise, even if NYSERDA, its employees, officers and members, and the State of New York have been advised of the possibility of damages. DISCLAIMER OF ENDORSEMENT Reference to any specific product, service, process, or method by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer or otherwise on this web site does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement, or favoring by NYSERDA, its employees, officers or members, or the State of New York, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. BACKGROUND The New York State Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) web-based DG/CHP data system has been providing performance information on CHP systems for the past ten years. This system includes monitored performance data and operational statistics for NYSERDA's Distributed Generation (DG)/Combined Heat and Power (CHP) demonstration projects including: Monitored Hourly Performance Data Operational Reliability and Availability Data Characteristics of Each Facility and its Equipment The Monitored Hourly Performance Data portion of the database allows users to view, plot, analyze, and compare performance data from one or several different DG/CHP sites in the NYSERDA portfolio. It allows DG/CHP operators at NYSERDA sites to enter and update information about their system. The database is intended to provide detailed, highly accurate performance data that can be used by potential users, developers, and other stakeholders to understand and gain confidence in this promising technology. The Operational Reliability Data portion of the database is intended to allow individual facility managers to better understand reliability, availability, and performance of their particular units and also determine how EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 1

NYSERDA their facilities compare with other units. Information on reliability and availability performance will enable potential onsite power users to make a more informed purchase decision, and will help policy makers quantify reliability benefits of customer-sited generation. NYSERDA s web-based DG/CHP data system provides general equipment information and detailed performance data, however, data alone does not provide the complete picture with respect to CHP systems design or performance. This report seeks to explain the performance data presented in the two fundamental output graphs: kw/h versus time and Useful MBtu/h versus time. FIGURE 1 NYSERDA CHP WEBSITE PERFORMANCE GRAPHS This report provides an explanation for system performance trends and anomalies by further assessing the data supporting these two graphs and, where necessary, conducts interviews of the developers, owners and operators. THE SITE FIGURE 2 TOREN CONDOMINIUMS Toren Condominium s (CHP) generation system supplies heat, hot water, air conditioning and electricity to the 300,000 sq ft mixed- use complex. The CHP units are powered by clean-burning natural gas and offset 500kW Page 2 EXERGY Partners Corp.

of electric demand on the ConEdison local distribution grid that has become strained due to the neighborhood s recent development. Toren Condominiums The 37 story building offers 240 condominium homes with breathtaking floor-to-ceiling views of the Manhattan skyline and New York harbor as well as the opportunity to live in the most environmentally advanced high-rise residential building in New York. THE SYSTEM The Toren Condominium CHP plant consists of five Tecogen CM 100 cogeneration units (Figure 3) capable of a total output of 500 kw. The central plant also includes six 1,700 MBH natural gas fired modular hot water boilers to supplement the heat recovery, if needed. The heat recovery is used for temperature control and domestic hot water. FIGURE 3 THREE OF THE FIVE TECOGEN CM 100 COGENERATION UNITS Toren s CHP plant is designed to automatically follow the building s electric demand. As demand for electricity increases and decreases within the building, the electrical output from each of the CHP modules also increases and decreases. Through sophisticated load control software built into each unit, the amount of electricity being purchased from Consolidated Edison, the electric utility in Brooklyn, can be maintained at less than 20kW. EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 3

NYSERDA FIGURE 4 ABSORPTION CHILLER PERFORMANCE The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers certain incentives to promote the installation of clean, efficient, and commercially available CHP systems that provide summer onpeak demand reduction. Incentives are performance-based and correspond to the summer-peak demand reduction (kw), energy generation (kwh), and fuel conversion efficiency (FCE) achieved by the CHP system on an annual basis over a two-year measurement and verification (M&V) period. Table 1 provides the data results taken since March of 2010. Hours of Good (Pwr) Data Net Electric Output (kwh) TABLE 1 SYSTEM EFFICIENCY 1 Natural Gas Use (MCF) Useful Heat Output (MMBtu) Electrical Efficiency Useful Thermal Efficiency Fuel Conversion Efficiency March-10 673 91,855 1,254.0 517.2 24.5% 40.4% 64.9% April-10 552 61,859 910.5 215.7 22.7% 23.2% 46.0% May-10 720 83,408 1,128.7 132.3 24.7% 11.5% 36.2% June-10 671 130,790 1,763.6 453.7 24.8% 25.2% 50.0% July-10 398 77,311 1,031.5 214.5 25.1% 20.4% 45.5% August-10 September-10 October-10 November-10 December-10 744 149,982 1,898.3 557.3 26.4% 28.8% 55.2% 1 Efficiency data is collected using all data points flagged as high quality data. Generally there is good correlation between the data quality of net electric output, natural gas use and useful heat rejection. Anomalies do occur, particularly with respect to natural gas use which causes distortions in the results. If efficiency results are out of normal range, the most likely cause is poor quality concurrent data which can be corroborated by the Site Data Quality table located in the Lessons Learned section of this report. Page 4 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums January-11 744 179,442 2,267.5 669.2 26.5% 28.9% 55.4% February-11 540 122,511 1,548.7 465.2 26.5% 29.5% 55.9% March-11 689 143,930 1,823.6 516.5 26.4% 27.8% 54.2% April-11 432 87,320 1,105.1 316.3 26.4% 28.1% 54.5% May-11 744 146,596 1,859.9 527.6 26.4% 27.8% 54.2% June-11 384 97,706 1,237.3 668.8 26.4% 53.0% 79.4% July-11 624 171,107 2,171.4 1,144.7 26.4% 51.7% 78.1% Total preceding 8 months 4901 1,098,593 13,912 4,866 26.4% 34.3% 60.7% Note: All efficiencies based on higher heating value of the fuel (HHV) Table 1 presents annual data showing the engine-based CHP system s electric efficiency at 26.4% (HHV) range which is expected for this reciprocating engine generator. Useful thermal performance is 47.2% for the period (HHV based on fuel input). The moderate thermal efficiency indicates limited thermal use during the shoulder months. The chillers clearly started to operate as expected in June and July 2011 as indicated by the higher thermal efficiency. FIGURE 5 ELECTRIC, THERMAL AND FUEL CONVERSION EFFICIENCY BY MONTH Figure 5 provides operating efficiency during the February July, 2010 time period, showing a slight decline in CHP electric efficiency in the summer due to a drop in power output (lower engine part load heat rate), and a slight increase in useful thermal efficiency performance because the low power output means a higher percentage of thermal energy. OPERATING SUMMARY EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 5

NYSERDA The CHP system consists of five reciprocating engine generators with a nominal capacity of 500 kw. During the 7,937 hours that met the range and relational checks 60.7% of this time, the CHP system delivered above 200 kwh/h (Figure 13). Generator output is limited to building electric load (electric load following) up until June 2010. Thermal loads show a slight dip in the middle of the day when space heating loads are modest. In April 2010, the units often shut down in the middle of the day, perhaps due to a lack of thermal load. During 2011, generally between 2 and 3 engine generators were operating 24/7. In July 2010, the unit operated intermittently, often shutting down in the morning and afternoon. This appears to be due to operational issues with the engine. See the shade plot below. The system appears to shut down at 11 pm each evening due to a data transfer issue that was fixed in early 2011 (the system was assumed to actually operate) FIGURE 6 CHP POWER GENERATED VERSUS BUILDING LOAD BY MONTH Figure 6 shows the electric load profile for Toren Condominium is operating in electric load following mode. Page 6 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums POWER GENERATION AND USEFUL THERMAL ENERGY FIGURE 7 CHP POWER OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 7 breaks out the electric load profile for Toren Condominium from the previous graph. The ensuing power graphs show two to three generators running 24/7. EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 7

NYSERDA Figure 8 shows a useful thermal energy in MMBtu/h. FIGURE 8 CHP USEFUL THERMAL OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Useful thermal increase in June 2011 is due to the absorption chiller coming online. Page 8 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums FIGURE 9 CHP POWER OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 9 covers the time period from January 3 9, 2011, providing CHP system power output by hour of the day pattern for the time period. January 8 is a Saturday. EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 9

NYSERDA FIGURE 10 CHP USEFUL THERMAL OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 10 shows the 24 hour useful CHP recovered heat thermal load profiles from January 3 9, 2011. Page 10 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums FIGURE 11 CHP POWER OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 11 covers the time period from March 21 27, 2011, providing CHP system power output by hour of the day pattern for the time period. March 26 is a Saturday. EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 11

NYSERDA FIGURE 12 CHP USEFUL THERMAL OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 12 shows the 24 hour useful CHP recovered heat thermal load profiles from March 21 27, 2011. Page 12 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums FIGURE 13 CHP POWER OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 13 covers the time period from June 6 12, 2011, providing CHP system power output by hour of the day pattern for the time period. June 11 is a Saturday. EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 13

NYSERDA FIGURE 14 CHP USEFUL THERMAL OUTPUT VERSUS TIME Figure 14 shows the 24 hour useful CHP recovered heat thermal load profiles from June 6 12, 2011. June 11 is a Saturday. Page 14 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums PERFORMANCE SUMMARY During the 7,937 hours that met the range and relational checks 60.7% of this time, the CHP system delivered above 200 kwh/h (Figure 15). FIGURE 15 PERFORMANCE BY POWER BINS EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 15

NYSERDA LESSONS LEARNED Hours of Good (Pwr) Data Net Electric Output (kwh) TABLE 2 SYSTEM EFFICIENCY 2 Natural Gas Use (MCF) Useful Heat Output (MMBtu) Electrical Efficiency Useful Thermal Efficiency Fuel Conversion Efficiency March-10 673 91,855 1,254.0 517.2 24.5% 40.4% 64.9% April-10 552 61,859 910.5 215.7 22.7% 23.2% 46.0% May-10 720 83,408 1,128.7 132.3 24.7% 11.5% 36.2% June-10 671 130,790 1,763.6 453.7 24.8% 25.2% 50.0% July-10 398 77,311 1,031.5 214.5 25.1% 20.4% 45.5% August-10 September-10 October-10 November-10 December-10 744 149,982 1,898.3 557.3 26.4% 28.8% 55.2% January-11 744 179,442 2,267.5 669.2 26.5% 28.9% 55.4% February-11 540 122,511 1,548.7 465.2 26.5% 29.5% 55.9% March-11 689 143,930 1,823.6 516.5 26.4% 27.8% 54.2% April-11 432 87,320 1,105.1 316.3 26.4% 28.1% 54.5% May-11 744 146,596 1,859.9 527.6 26.4% 27.8% 54.2% June-11 384 97,706 1,237.3 668.8 26.4% 53.0% 79.4% July-11 624 171,107 2,171.4 1,144.7 26.4% 51.7% 78.1% Total preceding 8 months 4901 1,098,593 13,912 4,866 26.4% 34.3% 60.7% Note: All efficiencies based on higher heating value of the fuel (HHV) The Toren Condominium CHP plant consists of five Tecogen CM 100 cogeneration units. The central plant also includes six 1,700 MBH natural gas fired modular hot water boilers to supplement the heat recovery, if needed. The heat recovery is used for heating, cooling and domestic hot water. 2 Efficiency data is collected using all data points flagged as high quality data. Generally there is good correlation between the data quality of net electric output, natural gas use and useful heat rejection. Anomalies do occur, particularly with respect to natural gas use which causes distortions in the results. If efficiency results are out of normal range, the most likely cause is poor quality concurrent data which can be corroborated by the Site Data Quality table located in the Lessons Learned section of this report. Page 16 EXERGY Partners Corp.

Toren Condominiums FIGURE 16 CAPACITY FACTOR 3 Capacity Factor (Figure 16) presents the CHP generated power efficiency over the time period (297 days). This Figure provides a very good overview of the CHP power capacity versus site power requirements and a good understanding of the useful thermal energy recovered. The Figure shows the system generally operated between 1% and 62% of the generating capacity at about 26.5% power efficiency (HHV) during the last 12 months of Table 2. The electric capacity is determined, in-part, by the occupancy of the building as this new condominium becomes occupied. Note the generally flat nature of the electricity performance curve reflects a certain amount of model predictive calculation due to incomplete data. The useful thermal energy (heating, cooling and domestic hot water) operating efficiency during the most recent 12 month period in Table 2 averaged 34.4% thermal efficiency (HHV). The useful thermal energy performance falls into two distinct patterns the lower cluster for heating which trails off in performance and power is reduced and the higher cluster which related to the absorption chiller. Consistent operation of the absorption chiller in the summer months clearly had a big impact on the useful heat recovery. Absorption chillers that can run base-loaded to meet building cooling loads can greatly improve summertime heat recovery. 3 The data shown in the Capacity Factor graph passes all data quality checks and therefore, in some cases where data quality is poor, leaves out a significant amount of data points. EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 17

NYSERDA Supplemental data in Figure 17 shows that increased occupancy through the latter half of 2011 and the first half of 2012 has increased the CHP performance. FIGURE 17 SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE DATA Page 18 EXERGY Partners Corp.

APPENDIX A: KEY DATA MEASURES AND QUALITY Toren Condominiums The three key parameters contributing to system energy efficiency were DG/CHP Generator Output, DG/CHP Generator Gas Use and Useful Heat Recovery (total MBtu). These parameters were measured at this site as follows: 1. DG/CHP Generator Output (total kwh) The Generator Output comes from the columns labeled Plant Power Output (kw) in the data files from Energy Concepts. This 15-minute interval energy data is summed into hourly data. 2. DG/CHP Generator Gas Use (total cubic feet) The data for Generator Gas Input comes from the data point Plant Total Gas Use (scf) in the data files from Energy Concepts. This data is provided in standard cubic feet for each 15-minute interval and summed into hourly data. 3. Useful Heat Recovery (total MBtu) The Useful heat Recovery is obtained from the columns of data labeled HX-3 Flow, HX-3 Primary Entering Temp, and HX-3 Primary Leaving Temp in the files obtained from Energy Concepts. These points are used to calculate the heat recovery for each interval. This 15-minute data is summed into hourly data. Data Collection and quality for this site ranges from 0% through 100% during three months. (Table 3) Data quality on this site is an issue. TABLE 3 SITE DATA QUALITY Percentage of Good Data Useful Power Gas Use Heat March-10 92.1% 92.2% 89.1% April-10 78.1% 78.1% 77.9% May-10 98.9% 98.9% 98.9% June-10 95.4% 95.2% 90.9% July-10 68.3% 68.3% 67.8% August-10 September-10 October-10 November-10 3.3% 0.0% 3.3% December-10 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% January-11 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% February-11 83.3% 83.3% 83.3% March-11 93.9% 93.9% 93.9% April-11 61.1% 61.1% 61.1% May-11 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% June-11 68.2% 68.2% 68.2% July-11 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% EXERGY Partners Corp. Page 19