ERCOT ISO: Current Market and Trends in Future Market Design

Similar documents
Austin Energy s New GMS and Integration with Market Systems

Lessons Learned: The Texas Experience

Distributed Energy Resources

SPP at a Glance. Located in Little Rock. Approximately 600 employees

Third Generation California Electricity Market Design

Market Design and Gaming in Competitive Electricity Markets

Two Settlement PJM /06/2016

1st International Conference on Large-Scale Grid Integration of Renewable Energy in India Durgesh Manjure, MISO Energy September 6, 2017

The Texas Experience: Implications of 8,000+ MW Wind Generation Resources In ERCOT. David Campbell CEO, Luminant 2009 Summer Seminar August 3, 2009

Recent Development in Reliable Energy Market in the US and Singapore

LMP Implementation in New England

INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO)

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Working Paper on Standardized Transmission Service and Wholesale Electric Market Design

PJM Markets. Energy and Ancillary Services. PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM /29/2014

Report to the Texas Senate Committee on Business & Commerce

Seminar on African Electrical Interconnection. Module 7 - Market Operational Structures

Energy Uplift (Operating Reserves)

Straw Proposal. Post-Release 1 MRTU Functionality for Demand Response

Draft Whitepaper to Platte River Board of Directors

The Evolution of the PJM Market in the United States: Looking Back to Look Forward

ISO REVISED STAGING PLAN NO. 7

The New Jersey Clean Energy Conference September 26, PJM Overview. Kenneth W. Laughlin VP Markets Coordination PJM

PJM ARR and FTR Market

Virtual Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2017/2018

RDRP Stakeholder Initiative

Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)

Congestion Revenue Rights Auction Efficiency Track 1B Straw Proposal

2018 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap

The Virtues of A Virtual RTO

International Power North America Ian Nutt

Industry Perspectives on FERC Standard Market Design

EUCI Presents: MAXIMIZING VALUE OF GENCO ASSETS IN ERCOT NODAL MARKET

2017 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT FOR THE ERCOT ELECTRICITY MARKETS

Reduced Network Modeling of WECC as a Market Design Prototype

Power Markets and Renewables Deployment in Developing Countries

PJM Organization and Markets. Saudi Delegation Columbus Ohio May 22, 2012

PJM Wholesale Markets. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia

Energy Uplift (Operating Reserves)

Regional Impact of Renewables: ERCOT

Locational Based Marginal Pricing

NEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR

Reliability Demand Response Product

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Overview of Congestion Revenue Rights In the New California Energy Market

Financial Transmission Rights

Status Update Assessment of ICT/RTO Options and Issues

Wholesale Electricity Markets. New England Independent System Operator. Commissioner Mark Vannoy Maine Public Utilities Commission

Key Issues and Consideration in Market Design, Operational and Oversight

Market Power Mitigation and Load Pricing

NMMS and The ERCOT CIM Network Model

2018 Draft Policy Initiatives Roadmap. Market and Infrastructure Policy December 7, 2017

Internal NYISO HVDC Controllable Line Scheduling. Concept of Operation. LECG Staff

Analysis of Potential Impacts of CO 2 Emissions Limits on Electric Power Costs in the ERCOT Region

CRR Study 2: Discussion of Allocation Rules and Market Participant Comments/Questions

ISO Net Surplus Collection & Allocation in Wholesale Power Markets under LMP

Competitive Renewable Energy Zones: Texas Solution to the Poultry Dilemma? Dan Woodfin Manager, Regional Planning 03/16/2007

Electric Competition in Texas Testimony before the Senate Business & Commerce Committee February 20, Bill Peacock Center for Economic Freedom

Transmission Congestion and Loss Only Virtual Product. Overview

Demand Response in Wholesale Electricity Markets

Demand Response Data Task Force Draft Report Outline and Work Plan

Section 3 Characteristics of Credits Types of units. Economic Noneconomic Generation.

Benefits from Generation and Storage on the Distribution System

3.2 Market Settlements.

3.2 Market Buyers Spot Market Energy Charges.

Presentation on Draft SCED RFP

MISO-PJM Interface Pricing Post Implementation Metrics and Criteria

STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2005

Design Considerations for an Alberta Capacity Market

APS Stakeholder Meeting. September 9 th 2016

Lessons Learned from Past Electricity Market Design Models and Road Map for the Next Generation Design Models

10.1 Scope of CMRI Reports available to SCs

Competitive Wholesale Electricity Market, Transactions, Pricing and LMP Decomposition

Renewables and electricity market design

Competitive Markets. Facilitated Dialogue: Market Restructuring & Renewable Energy. June 10-12, 2013 Mexico City, Mexico. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E.

Billing Line Items PJM /23/2017

Contracts and Communication

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Congestion Revenue Rights Auction Efficiency Track 1A Draft Final Proposal Addendum

3. Overview of Market Instruments

Evaluation of Long Term Power Supply Alternatives

Does electricity get cheaper and cleaner with more wind in ERCOT?

Overview of PJM: Looking Back to Look Forward Tokyo Power Market Summit

SPP EIS Market Overview. Western Visitors

Competitive Markets 1

Fixed / Price Sensitive Demand Bids, Load Response, Virtual Bidding & Pump Storage Optimizer in the Day Ahead Market

A Case Study: Optimal Wholesale Power Buying in ERCOT

CUSTOMER GUIDE TO PJM BILLING

Market Settlements - Advanced

Data Miner 2 11/20/ PJM 2017

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP): Basics of Nodal Price Calculation

ConOp. Internal NYISO Controllable Lines. Concept of Operation. Scott Harvey, LECG. Document Locator:

Congestion and Marginal Losses

The South-central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource SPEER. SPEER Incremental Demand Response Report

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. NYISO Tariffs. OATT Schedules

RTO Overview and Day 2 Markets. EAI Technical Conference May 26, 2011

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Presentation for the Local Government Commission and the Community Environmental Council. July 13, 2007

Components of A Successful Industrial Demand Response Strategy

Committed Offer: Offer on which a resource was scheduled by the Office of the Interconnection for a particular clock hour for the Operating Day.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. The following staff members of the Department of Market Monitoring contributed to this report:

Transcription:

ERCOT ISO: Current Market and Trends in Future Market Design Reza Alaghehband, P.E. Control Engineering, Austin Energy, Austin, TX EMS Users Group Meeting September 12-13, 2005 Providence, RI

Outline: A. Overview of Austin Energy B. Overview of ERCOT ISO C. Current ERCOT Zonal Market D. New Nodal Market Design

A. Overview of Austin Energy: Municipal electric Utility 390,000 customers Peak net load of 2383 MW Generation Resources: coal, gas, nuclear, wind, and co-gen. 2750 MW capacity 9 Trans/68 Distribution subs ERCOT Member QSE, NOIE,

B. Overview of ERCOT ISO A NERC Member Organization

B.1: ERCOT One of 10 regional Reliability Councils in NERC. ERCOT members serve about 85% of the load in Texas and 75% of TX area. ERCOT members have a generation capacity of approximately 75,000 MWs and 38,000 miles of transmission lines. The PUCT is the principal regulatory authority.

B.1: ERCOT (Cont d) ERCOT membership consists of: - 17 Industrial Consumers - 3 Retail/Commercial Consumers - 41 Electric Cooperatives - 16 Independent Generators - 19 Independent Power Marketers - 36 Independent Retail Electric Providers - 8 Investor Owned Utilities - 19 Municipal Owned Utilities

B.1: ERCOT Role Expansion 1970 1995 1999 2003 ERCOT Role Coordinate Coordinate Texas Senate PUCT electricity trans. deregulation of Bill 7 (SB7) - Order Reliability and of the wholesale Create and manage for Nodal power transfer generation a retail electricity Market Exploration among members market market and development

B.1: Market Participants ERCOT QSEs (Qualified Scheduling Entities) PGCs (Resource Entities) LSEs (Load serving Entities) TDSPs (Transmission and Distribution Service Providers) NOIEs (Non Opted-in Entities) Other Participants (i.e., - Aggregators - Power Marketers - PUCT (Public Utility Commission of Texas)

Customers ERCOT B.1: Market Participants (Cont d) ERCOT Competitive Market Participants Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) Resource Power Marketer (Optional) Load Serving Entity (LSE) Aggregator (Optional) Transmission and Distribution Service Provider (TDSP) NOIEs (Municipality/Cooperative) Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) Legend Key Information Flow Power Flow Non-Regulated Organization Regulated Organization

B.1: ERCOT s Primary Operations Production Operations Market Operations Financial Operations Registration ERCOT Core Operations Registration Market Operations Power Operations Load Profiling, Data Acquisition and Aggregation Settlements, Billing & Financial Transfer

C. Current ERCOT Zonal Market The ERCOT market is Zonal based. Zonal model is based on the transfer capability of the 345 KV transmission System. Zones are determined by clustering load and generation buses according to their shift factors(impacts) on selected CSCs (Commercially Significant Constraints) Northeast West North South Houston

C.1: ERCOT Retail Electricity Market ERCOT Bilateral Market Electricity sellers Electricity buyers Resources Bilateral Transactions Load Serving Entities Retail Customers QSEs Bilateral Transactions QSEs

C.2: Key Reliability Concepts As operator of the single control area: Ensure generation availability to support the system load Ensure Transmission capacity Real-time balancing of Energy Supply and demand

C.3: Ancillary Services - Capacity -Regulation Reserve -Responsive Reserve -Non-Spinning Reserve -Replacement Reserve -Voltage Support -Reliability Must Run (RMR) -Out of Merit (OOM) -Black start

C.3: Ancillary Services - Energy -Balancing Energy -RMR Energy -OOM Energy -Black Start Energy

C.4: Market Operations Process Four Major Sets of activities - Day-Ahead Market - Adjustment Period - Hour-Ahead Period - Real-time Balancing Energy Market Clearing

C.5: ERCOT Technical Interfaces Five main technical interfaces: 1. Portal Bowser-based interface 2. Transaction Clearinghouse 3. Application Programmatic Interface (API) 4. Real-time ICCP Interface 5. Real-time Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) Interface

D. New Nodal Market Design: PUCT Subst. R 25.501 (9/2003) Ordered ERCOT: Explore and develop a framework for a nodal based congestion management system With: a Day Ahead (DA) market for energy and a DA reliability unit commitment process.

D.1: Drivers Issues associated with Zonal, including: 1. Congestion Costs - Intra-zonal congestion costs have been significant (averaging $200 million/year in 2002, 2003, and 2004). 2. Operational Issues with Zonal Model - Complexity. Market clearing - 3 step now. Congestion management not transparent for Market Participants. Constraint oscillation problem under 2 step process. Zone and CSC changes 3. Politics

The cost to solve Local Congestion will be uplifted pro rata to each QSE based on the Load Ratio Share by QSE. (ERCOT Protocols 7.1) D.1: Uplifted Congestion Costs Over $1Billion, in Less Than 4Years Uplifted Congestion Cost 7/31/01-5/31/05 1200000000 1000000000 800000000 600000000 400000000 200000000 OOMC OOMC ADR LBEDN LBEUP OOMDN OOMUP RMR (net) TOTAL 0 OOMC OOMC ADR LBEDN LBEUP OOMDN OOMUP RMR (net) TOTAL Service

D.3: Sept 2003: PUCT Guidelines Project 36376 Bidding Pricing Resource Specific (including Loads) Nodal for Resources, Zonal for Loads DA Markets Hubs Congestion Revenue Rights Ancillary Service, Energy (Voluntary Participation), Reliability For Energy Trading Options, Obligations, Flowgates Two-Settlement Prices and Financial Obligations in Day Ahead & Real Time

D.4: Texas Nodal Status Spring 04 summer 04 2/05 3/05 10/06 ( 09 now) Subject to Change! 1 st draft { } Protocol TX Nodal TNT Protocol Protocol Filing at PUCT proposed Developed Comment& PUCT Implementation Development,Economist Recommend

D.5: Nodal Fundamentals 3 Part Resource Specific Offers + SCUC + SCED = BACK of Nodal

D.5: Nodal Fundamentals Definition Security Constrained Unit Commitment (SCUC): Mathematical process for finding a projected dispatch that minimizes the total bid-cost of meeting demand subject to all transmission and reliability constraints Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED): Mathematical process for finding a dispatch (and LMPs) that minimizes the total bid-cost of meeting demand subject to all transmission constraints

D.5: Nodal Fundamentals Definition (Cont d) Resource Bidding Under Nodal--3 Part Offers for Each Resource Start up Cost Minimum Energy Energy $/MW LSL Three part bids are used in DA Energy Market (DAEM) and in the DA Reliability Market (in RUC) The Energy component of the 3-part bid is used in RT market as the basis for SCED MW

D.6: Nodal Market Building Blocks Day Ahead -Energy Market -Ancillary Service Capacity Market -Reliability Commitment Real Time -Hour Ahead (HA) Processes -Real-Time Dispatch -Performance Measurement Settlement -Day-Ahead -Real-Time Congestion Revenue Rights -Types -Acquisition Method Mitigation Nodal will Retain Existing QSE Structure & Communications Incentive s Cost Efficiency Wholesale Impact on Retail

D.6: Integrated Day Ahead Market Inputs Energy Offers Energy Bids AS Offers AS Bids CRR Offers CRR Bids Self Schedules SCUC & SCED Outputs Resource Commitments Hourly LMPs ASMarket Results

D.6: SCED & Unit Basepoints Inputs Energy Offers SCADA Network Model Self- Schedules Resource Parameters from COP SCED Outputs Resource Dispatch Points 5 minute LMPs

D.7: Perceived Benefits of Nodal vs. Current Operation Attribu te Current Texas Nodal Benefits DA Reliabi lity Replacement Mkt (Residual) Centralized Unit Commitment More Efficient Overall DA Energy Market None officially DAEM: solving for Energy, Commitment & CRRs Choice for all participants Trans missio n Rights Flow-gates PTP Options, Obligations & Flowgates More Hedging Choice

D.7: Perceived Benefits of Nodal vs. Current Operation (Cont d) Attribute Current Texas Nodal Benefits Real Time Dispatch RT Reliability Congestion Clearing Portfolio + Unit Specific HA Studies Resource Specific HA RUC More Efficient, More Granular Control More Efficient Overall Zonal Nodal More Efficient, Improved Price Signals, Improved Congestion Management

D.8: Major Changes With Zonal Market Portfolio Bidding & Dispatch (out) - Resource Specific (3-Part) Offers - Resource Specific Dispatch Expanded DA Process - DA Energy Market (no official one now) - Capacity Trading (only bilateral) - Reliability Unit Commitment 15 minute dispatch (out) - 5 minute dispatch Resources paid Zonal MCPE for Balancing Energy (out) - Paid Location Price Load Energy Prices Calculated on Basis of Aggregated LMPs within 2003 Congestion Zone Geographic Areas

D.9: High Level Systems Impacts & Operational Impacts - New System Development - New Communications? - Much More Data!! - Maintain Current System Operation & Settlement while developing new systems - Operation of 2 systems in parallel for period of time - AGC by ERCOT not members

Thank You!!!