Standards for Nanotechnology Thanks to Pat Picariello for slides. ASTM International Committee E56 on Nanotechnology

Similar documents
Welcome New Members New Member Orientation

Welcome to New Member Orientation We will begin shortly.

In 1946, delegates from 25 countries met in London and decided to create a new international organization, of which the object would be "to

Strategic Planning & New Activity Development

We all have to start somewhere.

ASTM International. Unmanned Systems Portfolio. Mary Mikolajewski Manager, Technical Committee Operations. 19 May 2017 ANSI UAS Collaborative

ASTM International & Committee F40 on Declarable Substances in Materials. Brynn Murphy Staff Manager November 2007

Standards & Certification

Helping Our World Work Better.

TAPPI Standards: Regulations and Style Guidelines

F46 Aerospace Personnel Main Committee Opening

CHARACTERIZATION, TESTING AND STANDARDIZATION OF NANOMATERIALS IN MALAYSIA

RDA Secretary General Recruitment

Forum on Regional Cooperation: Developing Quality Infrastructure for Photovoltaic Energy Generation

Guidance for Handling Policy Initiatives within the Decisional Authority or Advisory Role of the EIM Governing Body

ASTM International: Background and Resources June, 27, 2016

STANDARDIZATION. A Guide to Understanding Standards Development Today

State & Territory Membership Groups. Terms of Reference & Guidelines

REGULATION (EU) NO 1169/ ORIGIN OF MEAT USED AS AN DEFINITION OF 'ENGINEERED ON THE PROVISION OF FOOD INFORMATION TO CONSUMERS

Arrangements for observer participation in the Board meetings

Standard Setting Procedure Invisible ISEAL Code [Version 6 December 2014] [A] = Aspirational criteria

Lloyd Whitman Deputy Director Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology

NANODEVICE and Opportunities for Standardization

Draft Recommendations for the Predictability Roadmap. October 2018

Highlights EPA publicly released a White Paper on Nanotechnology, 15 February 2007

SPP RE Regional Reliability Standards Development Process Manual

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MANDATE

During solution evaporation, there are two major competing evaporation-driven effects, coffee ring effect and Marangoni flow.

ASTM Main Committee F43 Language Services and Products

AAMI STANDARDS PROGRAM Policies and Procedures

CANADA. Highlight of Developments since the 3 rd Meeting of the WPMN. meeting of the OECD Working Party on

Nanotechnologies: 3-D Tomography in a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) PROPOSAL

OIML B 18 Edition 2018 (E)

The strategy. using Atomic Force Microscope; Biomolecules and Neutraceuticals examples

Name of Procedure. Description of Procedure. New policy Description of Revision

MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.

BEFORE THE ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGIES

James Knight President. /encl. The Name Behind the Standard for over 80 Years. KING TESTER CORPORATION 308 Schell Drive Phoenixville, PA 19460

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS:

Nuclear Codes and Standards Workshop Prague, Czech Republic. Ryan Crane

Guidelines on Partners Engagement

Moving toward Sustainability

IMS Technical Advisory Board Policies and Procedures Version 9.3 Draft for Comment

Stakeholder Involvement Policy Standard Operating Procedures

EFSA s Approach for the Safety Evaluation of Nanotechnology Products in the Food and Feed Area

ETUC RESOLUTION ON NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANOMATERIALS

Forest Stewardship Council FSC TERMS OF REFERENCE. For the Working Group to revise FSC-STD DRAFT of 9

Partners in Technology. Partners in Progress.

The expected outcomes known as what must go right will be that: DWGs will be established and / or reviewed within the RMIT organisation structure

Karmann Mills 1, Anthony Hickey 1, Alexander Tropsha 2

Learning Module Series. Introduction to Global Standards Development

EA Procedure and Criteria. For the Evaluation of Conformity. Assessment Schemes by EA. Accreditation Body Members

Part 2: Nano-objects

Proposer. Subject (the subject shall be described unambiguously and as concisely as possible)

ICAP Governance Framework

Performance standards for Returning Officers in Great Britain

X12 Corporate Administrative Policy and Procedure. Liaisons (CAP17)

TERMS OF REFERENCE. The form and function of the Stop TB Partnership Working Group on New Drugs, Its Core Group (CG), Subgroups and Secretariat

HYDRO ONE LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Overview of Current Development in Manufactured Nanomaterials (Canada)

Guidelines and Participant Workbook

U.S. Technical Advisory Group to ISO/Technical Committee 207 Clarification of Intent of ISO 14001

Highlight of Relevant Standards and State of Development. Marwan Alaydi, P.Eng January 30, 2018

8. The strategy agreed to by the Forum consists of the following three objectives:

FSC Forest Management Group System Procedures

Cannon River Watershed Plan Development: Work Plan

X12 Administrative Policy and Procedure. Organizational Lingo (CAP15)

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Cohu, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines (Revised May 16, 2018)

Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Report

MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES THE MISSION OF THE MOHAWK BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MANDATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Setting Standards for a Global Biobased Marketplace

General Retention and Disposal Authority: GA28

General Engagement Plan Briefing Compliance Audits & Spot Checks

Statutory report on corporate governance for TORM A/S for the financial year 2014 (regarding the Danish Financial Statement Act sec. 107b).

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Emerging Water Leaders Steering Committee Purpose and scope

GLOBAL STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REGIONAL SAFETY OVERSIGHT ORGANIZATIONS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EXECUTIVE SEARCH SERVICES. Issuance Date November 27, 2017

RCC Nanotechnology Initiative

RESOLUTIONS TAKEN BY THE TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT BOARD AT ITS TENTH MEETING ON 2-3 JUNE 1997 IN GENEVA

ARCTIC SDI Governance Document

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

EATON CORPORATION plc Board of Directors Governance Policies Last Revised: October 24, 2017 Last Reviewed: October 24, 2017

Bonsucro Benchmarking Protocol Version 1.0 May 2017

Economic and Social Council 13 July 2017

Nanotechnology and the Environment: Benefits and Risks. Kristen M. Kulinowski, PhD

NERC Analysis of NERC Standard Process Results Second Quarter 2011 in Docket Nos. RR , RR

Chair of the Northern Ireland Degree in Social Work Partnership. Information Pack

American Academy of Forensic Sciences Standards Board, LLC

American Access to the European Standardization Process a u g u s t

MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES THE MISSION OF THE MOHAWK BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Charter for the Information Technology Governance Group (ITGG)

Key Considerations for Implementing Bodies

TERMS OF REFERENCE Program Steering Committee & Industry Advisory Group

Time Warner Inc. Corporate Governance Policy

EUSTON AREA PLAN. Euston Management Board Terms of Reference

Workshop on nanomaterials

Validation of RFI Reports V Nov 2017

Transcription:

Standards for Nanotechnology Thanks to Pat Picariello for slides ASTM International Committee E56 on Nanotechnology 1

ASTM s primary objective is to be the foremost developer and provider of consensus standards, related technical information, and services having globally recognized quality and market relevance. 2

Why ASTM? A proven and practical system Established in 1898 138 Committees & 12,000+ Standards 30,000 members 5,500+ International Members from 125 countries 3,000 ASTM standards used in 60+ countries Audited Designator accreditation: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 3

Why ASTM? A practical system Process complies with WTO principles: Annex 4 of WTO/TBT Agreement All stakeholders involved (Public & Private Sector Cooperation) Neutral forum Consensus-based procedures Development and delivery of information made uncomplicated A common sense approach: industry driven Market relevant globally No project costs 4

138 Technical Committees Examples A1 on Steel, Stainless Steel, and Related Alloys B1 on Electrical Conductors D1 on Paint D2 on Petroleum Products and Lubricants D4 on Road and Paving Systems D18 on Soil and Rock E28 on Mechanical Testing E17 on Vehicle Pavement Systems E29 on Particle Size Characterization E30 on Forensic Science E50 on Environmental Assessment E54 on Homeland Security Applications E55 on Pharmaceutical Application of PAT E56 on Nanotechnology F1 on Electronics F4 on Medical & Surgical Materials & Devices F8 on Sports Equipment and Facilities F15 on Consumer Products F24 on Amusement Rides and Devices F25 on Ships and Marine Technology F29 on Anesthetic & Respiratory Equipment F37 on Light Sport Aircraft F38 on Unmanned Air Vehicle Systems F40 on Declarable Substances in Materials 5

ASTM s Balloting Process COS SOCIETY MAIN Subcommittee Ensures due process was afforded to all voters Last opportunity for vote submittal Main Committee 60% return; 90% affirmative Subcommittee 60% return; 2/3 affirmative TG TG draft development; no formal balloting 6

The ASTM process 1 member = 1 vote (not 1 country = 1 vote) Must be 100% - no consensus: any negative needs resolution Fast to market 7

1 Work Item Registration -New ides discussed & agreed upon -New standard or revision -Registration provides an e-copy 2 Document Construction -Revisions: Word copy provided -New: Templates -Assistance: Up-front & backend editorial services 3 Collaboration Tools / Authoring -Conference calls -Virtual Meetings -Interactive Forums -Email 4 Ballot Submittal -Deadline dates from Staff -On-line submittal form -Provide cover letter 5 Electronic Balloting -Automatic generation by staff upon receipt of a ballot item -Email notification of ballot -Platform independent, web-based system / write-in & uploaded input -Electronic reporting & feedback 6 Negative Resolution -Electronic receipt of feedback -Done at a meeting or Virtual Meeting -Use of persuasive & withdrawal options -Future improvements 7a Important Information- Going into the Meeting -Minutes & agendas -Items, reports, & materials -Schedules & logistics 7b Important Information- Tools and Forms -Tools page - My ASTM -Standards Tracker -Committee Page 8 Production & Distribution -Back-end editorial support -Proofing / Editorial services -Set in SGML & global distribution - Product types (CD, HC, VV) 8

ASTM Committee E56 Organized January 2005 by Industry Current Roster: 280 Individuals & Organizations 22 Countries Represented 3 Technical Subcommittees Subcommittee on Terminology & Nomenclature Subcommittee on Characterization: Physical, Chemical, and Toxicological Properties Subcommittee on Environment, Health & Safety 2 Resource Subcommittees Subcommittee on International Law & Intellectual Property Subcommittee on Liaison & International Cooperation 9

Committee Scope The Scope of the Committee shall be twofold: 1) the development of standards and guidance for nanotechnology & nanomaterials, and 2) the coordination of existing ASTM standardization related to nanotechnology needs. This coordination shall include the apportioning of specific requests for nanotechnology standards through ASTM s existing committee base, as well as the maintenance of appropriate global liaison relationships with activities (internal and external) related to this subject area. The Committee shall participate in the development of symposia, workshops, and other related activities to enhance the development of standards. 10

E56.01 Terminology Chairman: Vicki Colvin, Rice University Membership: 95 Individuals & Organizations Standards Developed: E2456-06 Standard Terminology Relating to Nanotechnology Developed in Partnership with: American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Japanese National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), NSF International, and Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI) Terms defined include Nanotechnology, Nano, Nanoparticle, Nanoscale, Nanoscience, Nanostructured, Particle, Fine Particle, Ultrafine Particle, Transitive Nanoparticle, Non- Transitive Nanoparticle, Aggregate, & Agglomerate 11

E56.02 Characterization: Physical, Chemical, and Toxicological Properties Co-Chairmen: Martin Fritts, Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory & Alan Rawle, Malvern Instruments Membership: 100 Individuals & Organizations Standards Developed: E2578-07 Standard Practice for Calculation of Mean Sizes/Diameters and Standard Deviations of Particle Size Distributions E2524-08 Standard Test Method for Analysis of Hemolytic Properties of Nanoparticles E2525-08 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of the Effect of Nanoparticulate Materials on the Formation of Mouse Granulocyte- Macrophage Colonies E2526-08 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticulate Materials in Porcine Kidney Cells and Human Hepatocarcinoma Cells 12

ASTM Interlaboratory Studies (ILS) #166, #201, & #202 Generate data necessary to develop precision and bias statements for; E56 WK8705: Standard guide for measurement of particle size distribution of nanomaterials in suspension by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) E2524-08: Standard Practice for Analysis of Hemolytic Properties of Nanoparticles E2526-08: Standard Practice for Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticulate Materials on Porcine Kidney Cells and Human Hepatocarcinoma cells Generate ancillary data to support E56 WK8705 bias statement using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Test sample preparation methods for E56 WK10417: Standard Practice for the Preparation of Nanomaterial Samples for Characterization Test Materials: RM 8011, Nominal 10 nm Diameter Gold Nanoparticles RM 8012, Nominal 30 nm Diameter Gold Nanoparticles RM 8013, Nominal 60 nm Diameter Gold Nanoparticles Amine terminated G6 PAMAM dendrimers Hydroxy terminated G6 PAMAM dendrimers 13

E56.03 Environment, Health, and Safety Chairman: Kristen Kulinowski, Rice University Membership: 103 Individuals & Organizations Standards Developed: E2535-07 Standard Guide for Handling Unbound Engineered Nanoscale Particles in Occupational Settings Significance & Use: This Guide is intended for use by entities involved in the handling of UNP in occupational settings. The Guide covers handling principles and techniques that may be applied, as appropriate, to the variety of UNP materials and handling settings. These settings include research and development activities, material manufacturing, and material use and processing. The Guide may also be used by entities that receive materials or articles containing or comprising nanoscale particles fixed upon or within a matrix (i.e., bound nanoscale particles), but whose own processes or use may reasonably be expected to cause such particles to become unbound. 14

Drivers (1) Factors that shape prioritization of activities Based around the needs and the contribution of members and member organizations Time devoted by members Driven by one or 2 (key?) volunteer individuals (as are most standards activities) These individuals have to fit this (standards writing) in with other activities (unless they re retired) Complexity of the job Urgency of needs Utilization of new informational technologies 15

Drivers (2) Factors that shape prioritization of activities Easy to criticize rather than participate One negative holds up the ASTM process these need work to resolve. Some negatives appear not logical! How can we change this? 16

Strategy teams within E56 E56.90 Executive E56.91 sets strategy these are standard groups within ASTM committees 17

E56.91 Strategic Planning and Review Subcommittee Scope: This subcommittee acts in an advisory and coordination role, supporting the E56 main committee and all E56 subcommittees. Two main activities will be pursued: 1. Collaborative definition and coordination of strategic visions, long range plans, and high-level goals across E56 and its subcommittees 2. Quarterly review of progress against agreedupon visions, plans, and goals, as defined by #1, above. 18

Short term activities In ASTM a standard can be revised at any time just has to go to ballot (and be approved by voting members). Automatic revision (or dropping after 6 years) WK8051 Standard Terminology for Nanotechnology continuous update and revision 19

Short (1-2years) term plans for E56.02 proposed activities (WK8705) GUIDE FOR MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF NANOMATERIALS IN SUSPENSION BY PHOTON CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY (PCS) Mobility/Zeta Potential (Rawle) Prioritize needs for new standards from existing protocols and initiate work on 6-10 new draft standards (Fritts) Accelerate standard development time through the use of electronic tools (a goal of 4 months to become a standard after electronic draft approval) Provide hands-on testing of draft standards through informal ILS testing Expand ILS testing to achieve faster dissemination of standards and to qualify laboratories in instrumentation and protocols that are becoming increasingly complex New work item for nanotechnology ontology 20

Medium (2-5 years) term plans for proposed activities We need a crystal ball! With apologies to Escher 2 years is a long time in politics - and nanotechnology! 21

Next E56 Committee Week Title: Nanotechnology Dates: Monday May 5th 2008 - Wednesday May 7th 2008 Location: Hyatt Regency Denver; Denver, CO US Event Name: May 2008 Committee Week All are welcome! Only $75 to join ASTM 22

Questions? ASTM Website www.astm.org