Effects of weed and erosion control on communities of soil mites (Oribatida and Gamasina) in short-rotation willow plantings in central New York

Similar documents
HERBICIDES AND LIFE IN THE SOIL

M.J. Kaurmann 2001

Silviculture and Harvesting Abstracts

An introduction to biostimulants and current practices. Dr Nikki Seymour Principal Soil Microbiologist Crop and Food Science, DAF

Fresh Residues. Up to 15% of organic matter is fresh residue Comprised mainly of litter fall Much can be recognized as plant residue

Willow Biomass Production, Potential and Benefits

Michigan State University December, 1999 Forest Biomass Innovation Center Research Report 1999(a)

Effects of ph on Herbicide Activity

33. Fate of pesticides in soil and plant.

Implication of soil management on biodiversity: a case study from Italian vineyard

ON-LINE LIBRARY RESEARCH NOTES. Herbicide Screening For Phytotoxicity In Hybrid Poplars, Aspen, And Larch.

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

THE INFLUENCE OF AGRICULTURE ON BIODIVERSITY OF SOIL ORGANISMS (WHEAT FARMS OF AHWAZ TOWNSHIP)

Considerations for Managing Cover Crops. Andrew Price USDA-ARS-NSDL

Carbon Sequestration in Agro-Ecosystems

Soil biology, organic matter, structure, functioning and crop yield Matthew Shepherd Soil Biodiversity Specialist Natural England

GROWERS GUIDE. to Soil Health.

Cover and Catch Crops. Tim Martyn

SOIL RESPIRATION RATES AFTER 25 YEARS OF NO-TILLAGE

Cover Crops for Soil Health and Water Quality

OUR FOOD, OUR SOIL: sustainable agriculture in the 21 st century. Sina Adl Department of Biology Dalhousie University

LF-C 1, 2 HF-C 1, 2 Humic acid-c 1

Biology, Sustainability and Interdependence

WINTER ANNUAL GRAZING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS EFFECTS ON SWEET CORN

UPDATE ON GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT HORSEWEED IN ARKANSAS COTTON

- In relation to the net CO 2 -displacement

Evaluation of perennial cereal rye longevity and forage production when harvested at different stages of maturities and under grazing.

Soil health has three main components Sustained biological productivity Environmental quality Plant and animal health

Multifunctional production of biomass for the bio-based economy. Erik Steen Jensen Biosystems and Technology LTJ Faculty

Sampling for Soil Microarthropods By Jill Clapperton (PhD) Principal Scientist Rhizoterra Inc.

Agricultural practices that reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) and generate co-benefits

Cover Crops What we have learned on claypan soils. Mike Plumer

Effects of planting density on growth and yield of hybrid willow (Salix spp.) crops.

Managing Pesticide Resistance

Pasture Soil Health. Doug Peterson Missouri NRCS

Examining the potential uses for biuret in New Zealand forestry

Indiana Soil and Water

Soil CO 2 Flux in Short Rotation Willow Biomass Crop Across 21- year Chronosequence as Affected by Continuous Production and Tear Out Treatments

Arthropod Diversity and Pest Dynamics in Various Production Input Levels and Cropping System Strategies

Herbicide-Resistant Weeds

THE MICROORGANISM SUPER HIGHWAY: MANAGING SOIL BIOLOGY. John P. Brooks USDA-ARS

Estimating the Overall Impact of A Change In Agricultural Practices on Atmospheric CO 2

Sequestering Carbon in Cropping and Pasture Systems

Changes within oribatid mite communities associated with Scots pine regeneration

Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques

EFFECTS OF DATE AND RATE OF BILLET PLANTING ON SUGARCANE YIELD

The Sustainability of Forest Residue for Bioenergy in Canada: What can biodiversity tell us? Venier, L.A., Aubin, I., Webster, K. Fleming, R.

The Unseen World Beneath Our Feet: The Role of Soil Biota in Supporting Soil Health

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

ENGINEERED FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE GROWTH. IgniteS HEALTHIER SOILS STRONGER PLANTS HIGHER YIELDS

Tillage Management and Soil Organic Matter

Production of Biofuels Feedstock on Agriculture Land and Grasslands

2009 Cover Crop Termination Study

RELAY INTERCROP WHEAT-SOYBEAN PRODUCTION UTILIZING GLYPHOSATE AS A WHEAT HARVEST AID TO INCREASE SOYBEAN GRAIN YIELDS AND MAINTAIN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS

Oribatid fauna (Acari, Oribatida) in fallen spruce trees in the Babia Góra National Park

Grain producers often express concern

SOYBEAN WEED MANAGEMENT Mark VanGessel and Brad Majek

CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

PERENNIAL CROPS FOR BIO-FUELS AND CONSERVATION

Conservation Cropping Systems Initiative. Individual Site Report: Larry Huffmeyer. Ripley County Authors: Dr. Stacy Zuber Dr.

Assessing the impacts of intensive biomass removals and ash applications in the boreal forest

Kyusei Nature Farming in Japan: Effect of EM on the Growth and Yield of Spinach Introduction Methods and Materials

Grapes, Wine, Balance and Soil Health. George W. Bird, Professor Department of Entomology Michigan State University

THE INTRODUCTION THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

I. Small Grain Cover Crops and Weed Management Demonstrations (Mark VanGessel)

FORESTS, FIRE AND ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES MORE THAN JUST GOOD IN THEORY

Improved Fertilizer use Efficiency with Controlled Release Sources on Sandy Soils in South Florida. FDACS Contract

LONG-TERM TILLAGE AND POULTRY LITTER APPLICATION IMPACTS ON CROP PRODUCTION IN NORTHEASTERN ALABAMA

Estimates of Sustainably Produced Biomass Feedstocks in New York Timothy A. Volk SUNY-ESF

Effects of a Prescribed Burn on Soil Microarthropod Populations at Nancytown, GA

NUTRIENT RELEASE RATES FROM ORGANIC MULCHES AND COVER CROPS

Soil mesofauna responses to woody debris biomass management in the Canadian boreal forest Laurent Rousseau Lisa Venier (CFS) & Tanya Handa (UQÀM)

Above- and Below-ground Biomass and Soil Organic Carbon Inventories of Willow Biomass Crops Across a 19-year Chronosequence

Organic Farming in a Changing Climate

Soil biology for soil health

Rhizosphere Affects on Soil Quality. Slake Test Demonstration Infiltration Test

Michigan State University December, 2016 Forest Biomass Innovation Center Research Report 2016(J)

Agriculture and Society: Part II. PA E & E Standards 4.4

Local Bioenergy: Benefits and Challenges

Organic pest and disease control

This talk should cover:

COVER CROP MANAGEMENT IN PROCESSING SNAP BEAN. A.J. Bussan, Michael Copas, and Michael Drilias 1

Managing forests for the future climate. Simeon Smaill

LESSONS FROM THE RADIATA PINE EXPERIENCE

Climate change factors influencing microbial turnover of soil organic matter. Bobbi Helgason Ph.D., P.Ag. Soil Microbiologist, AAFC Saskatoon

How to measure soil health. Caley Gasch NDSU Soil Health Research

CHAPTER # 4. Fate of Pollutants in the Environment

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1

Towards understanding complex agricultural systems with soil-test biological activity

Maryland s Healthy Soils Initiative: Developing a program for sequestering carbon in agricultural soils

CHAPTER 8 GENERAL DISCUSSION

Research on Transition from Conventional to Sustainable Agriculture: The Rodale Farming Systems Trial Introduction

Questions and Answers about Glyphosate

Address correspondence to: Dr. A.D. Tomlin London Research Centre Agriculture Canada 1400 Western Rd. London, Ont. Canada N6G2V4

Cover Cropping and Strip Tillage to Improve Crop Performance and Food Safety in Muskmelon Production

Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai , India. Received : Accepted : ABSTRACT

IMPACT OF CONSERVATION PRODUCTION PRACTICES ON SOIL MOISTURE AVAILABILITY IN ALLUVIAL SOILS

Biology and Ecology of Soilborne Organisms

Leopold Center. Interactions of VAM fungi, pesticides, and crops COMPETITIVE GRANT REPORT

Building Soil Organic Matter: What, Why, How?

Transcription:

1061 Effects of weed and erosion control on communities of soil mites (Oribatida and Gamasina) in short-rotation willow plantings in central New York Maria A. Minor and Roy A. Norton Abstract: Several pre-emergent herbicides (azafenidin, oxyfluorfen, and imazaquin pendimethalin mixture), used for weed control during the establishment of short-rotation willow plantings, were tested for their impact on population density, species richness, and community structure of predaceous (Gamasina) and saprophagous and (or) mycophagous (Oribatida) soil mites. The experimental control was hand-weeded (no herbicide). Two site preparation treatments were used: conventional (disked) and erosion controlled (no-till with cover crop of winter rye). The influence of herbicide application on non-target organisms (soil mites) cannot be generalized, with groups being differentially affected. Overall, Oribatida were most affected by herbicides. Among specific herbicides, azafenidin and oxyfluorfen had a negative effect on density and species richness of soil mites. The response of Oribatida and Gamasina to herbicides was species-specific. Two species of Oribatida (Sellnickochthonius immaculatus (Forsslund) and Liochthonius lapponicus (Trägårdh)) declined significantly in all herbicidetreated plots. The cover crop residue had positive effect on both Oribatida and Gamasina; the negative effect of herbicides on Oribatida was greatly mitigated by cover crop. Herbicides appear to reduce mite diversity and alter community structure, but they do not always affect abundance. We speculate that the sensitivity of Oribatida to herbicides can reflect the indirect impacts of herbicides on soil microflora. Résumé : Plusieurs herbicides de prélevée (azafénidine, oxyfluorfène et un mélange d imazaquine et de pendiméthaline), utilisés pour maîtriser la végétation lors de l établissement de plantations de saule à courte révolution, ont été testés quant à leur impact sur la densité de population, la richesse en espèces et la structure des communautés d acariens prédateurs (Gamasides) et saprophages ou mycophages (Oribates) dans le sol. La végétation a été éliminée manuellement (aucun herbicide) dans le traitement témoin. Deux traitements de préparation de terrain ont été utilisés : un traitement conventionnel (disquage) et un traitement visant à prévenir l érosion (aucun travail du sol avec une culture de protection de seigle d hiver). L impact de l application d herbicide sur les organismes non visés (acariens du sol) ne peut être généralisé étant donné que les différents groupes ne sont pas affectés delamême façon. Dans l ensemble, les Oribates ont été les plus affectés par les herbicides. Parmi les herbicides spécifiques, l azafénidine et l oxyfluorfène ont eu un effet négatif sur la densité et la richesse en espèces des acariens du sol. La réaction des Oribates et des Gamasides aux herbicides variait selon l espèce. Deux espèces d Oribates (Sellnickochthonius immaculatus (Forsslund) et Liochthonius lapponicus (Trägårdh)) ont significativement décliné dans toutes les parcelles traitées avec un herbicide. Les résidus de la culture de protection ont eu un effet positif tant sur les Oribates que sur les Gamasides; l effet négatif des herbicides sur les Oribates a été grandement atténué par la culture de protection. Les herbicides semblent réduire la diversité des acariens et altérer la structure des communautés mais ils n affectent pas toujours leur abondance. Nous croyons que la sensibilité des Oribates aux herbicides peut refléter les impacts indirects des herbicides sur la microflore du sol. [Traduit par la Rédaction] Introduction In temperate regions of the USA and Europe, plantationgrown willow (Salix spp.) is being developed as a new crop, Received 19 February 2007. Accepted 6 November 2007. Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at cjfr.nrc.ca on 24 April 2008. M.A. Minor 1,2 and R.A. Norton. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. 1 Corresponding author (e-mail: M.A.Minor@massey.ac.nz). 2 Present address: Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand. grown and harvested as a renewable source of fuel and fiber. Willows are easily propagated from cuttings, have high growth rates, and are able to resprout (coppice) after harvest, with the potential for high biomass yields every few years (Abrahamson et al. 2002). These crops offer a renewable alternative to fossil fuels as energy feedstock, and provide environmental and rural development benefits (Volk et al. 2006). The ecological sustainability of this new crop is being investigated. Johnston and Crossley (2002) highlighted the link between soil biodiversity, soil condition, and plant biomass production potential in a managed forestry system. In longer-rotation crops, such as commercial pine plantations, the abundance of soil oribatid mites has been related to changes in soil chemical and physical properties, which, in turn, cor- Can. J. For. Res. 38: 1061 1070 (2008) doi:10.1139/x07-207

1062 Can. J. For. Res. Vol. 38, 2008 related with soil fertility and vitality of the trees (Hogervorst et al. 1993). There is abundant evidence that feeding activities of soil fauna increase N and P mineralization flux, contribute to increased nutrient availability in soil, enhance nutrient uptake by plants, and influence plant nutrient content (Bardgett and Chan 1999; Cragg and Bardgett 2001). Grazing by soil oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida), for example, breaks down plant material, assists the microbial recolonization of litter material, stimulates microbial metabolism in the rhizosphere, and stabilizes nutrient leaching (Maraun et al. 1998b; Renker et al. 2005). Studies have shown that plant productivity increases in the presence of soil fauna, as a result of enhanced nutrient availability (Ingham et al. 1985; Scheu et al. 1999). Composition of the soil community is also important, as species-level changes in biota can differentially alter nutrient mineralization and, therefore, plant growth (Siepel and Maaskamp 1994; Cragg and Bardgett 2001). Plantation willows, grown at densities of 10 000 20 000 plantsha 1, are an intensively managed crop, with tillage, herbicides, and fertilizers used at different stages during their establishment and management. Soil cultivation and the application of biocides and fertilizers are the main factors affecting soil fauna in agroecosystems (Moore et al. 1984; Wardle 1995). With millions of hectares of marginal agricultural lands available for perennial woody biomass crops, their impacts on soil quality and soil biodiversity have become an important focus of research. Among environmental concerns with short-rotation willow biomass crops, the intensive weed control and the soil erosion during the establishment phase are important (Abrahamson et al. 2002). Weed control is a key factor in the successful establishment of willows; a broad-spectrum herbicide is applied before planting, and a pre-emergent herbicide is applied immediately after planting. Currently, only two pre-emergent herbicides (oxyfluorfen and simazine) are used in biomass plantations, because of labeling regulations and high susceptibility of willows to herbicides (Abrahamson et al. 2002). Trials are underway to test other pre-emergent herbicides. Cover crop and conservation tillage have been used to reduce soil erosion during the establishment phase. In the second growing season, a healthy willow crop closes the canopy, which inhibits weed growth and intercepts the rain, so weed control and erosion control measures are usually not required after the first year. In New York, several experimental studies addressed the short-term and long-term impacts of different planting and tillage methods (Minor et al. 2004) and different types of fertilizer (Minor and Norton 2004) used in growing shortrotation willows on soil fauna. Herein we explore the short-term impacts of several pre-emergent herbicides and cover crop that are tested for use during the establishment phase of plantations on two major groups of soil mesofauna: oribatid and gamasine mites (Acari). In a 2 year experimental field study, we assessed the impacts of a rye cover crop and of several pre-emergent herbicides on populations and community structure of Oribatida and Gamasina. Each is vulnerable to various pesticides (Koehler 1994; Salminen et al. 1997), but both the intensity and direction of responses vary among species (Koehler 1992; Prinzing et al. 2002). Gamasina are active, fluid-feeding predators of other microarthropods, insect larvae, and nematodes (Koehler 1997). Oribatid mites, which are particulate feeders, feed primarily on soil fungi, bacteria, algae, and decaying plant material, although some necrophagy or facultative predation occurs (Schneider et al. 2004a, 2004b). They are among the most abundant and speciesrich soil arthropods, and play an important role in decomposer food webs (Siepel and Maaskamp 1994). Materials and methods Site description and sampling The experiment was conducted at the State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry Genetics Field Station in Tully, New York (42847 45@N, 76807 00@E), as a part of the herbicide trial for the Biomass for Rural Development project (Wagner 2000). The site is on a glacial outwash terrace with a 0% 3% slope. Parent material is a gravely sandy outwash derived from limestone, sandstone, and shale, and the soil (Glossoboric Hapludalf of the Palmyra series) is a gravely loam with good to excessive drainage. The available water capacity is moderate to high, and ph in the surface layer ranges from medium acid to neutral (Hutton and Rice 1977). The study site (approx. 500 m 2 ) was disked in the summer of 1997. A first baseline sampling of soil mites in the site (60 random samples) was conducted on 10 October 1997 using methods described below. In late summer 1998, prior to a second baseline sampling, the site was sprayed with a mixture of glyphosate (RoundUp TM at 2.24 kg active ingredient (a.i.)ha 1 ) and dicamba (Banvel TM at 0.56 kg a.i.ha 1 ) followed 2 weeks later by disking (Wagner 2000). The second baseline sampling was on 13 October 1998 (also 60 random samples). The herbicide experiment was established in fall 1998 in a split-plot design, where the whole plot factor was presence or absence of a cover crop. The cover crop of winter rye (Secale cereale L.) was planted in fall 1998 after disking. In the spring of 1999, rye was killed with a postemergence herbicide (RoundUp TM at 2.24 kg a.i.ha 1 ; T. Volk, personal communication 2006) and left as residue. Plots without cover crop were disked in the spring of 1999 to control germinating weeds. The willow cuttings (Salix dasyclados Wimmer, clone SV1) were hand-planted in all plots on 18 May 1999 in single rows, with cuttings 0.6 m apart and rows 1.2 m apart. The subplot factor (replicated three times) was herbicide presence and type. Twelve treatment subplots (3.1 m 1.2 m) each contained a single row of five cuttings. Preemergent herbicides were applied in a single application on 19 May 1999, the day after planting (Wagner 2000). The following treatments were used in this study: oxyfluorfen (Goal TM 2XL) at 183.7 g a.i.ha 1 ; azafenidin (Milestone TM DPX-R6447) at 91.8 g a.i.ha 1 ; imazaquin pendimethalin mixture (Scepter TM 70 DG : Prowl TM 3.3 EC) at 23.0 g : 8.6 g a.i.ha 1 ; and control (hand-weeded by weekly hoeing). On 20 July 1999 and 17 October 1999 (at approximately 60 and 150 d, respectively, after treatment), 4 soil cores were collected within each treatment subplot, for a total of 96 cores in each sampling season. Sampling dates were selected to coincide with data collection in other willow trials. Mite extraction Samples (25 cm 2 to 5 cm depth) were taken at random lo-

Minor and Norton 1063 cations with a steel corer. Mites were extracted by drying the soil for 7 days in small Berlese Tullgren funnels constructed from commercial 10 cm diameter plastic greenhouse pots, using 7 W light bulbs as a heat source. Adult and immature oribatid and gamasine mites from each sample were counted and identified to species level using published keys, original species descriptions, and reference specimens from the Invertebrate Collection at the State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, New York) and the Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arachnids (Ottawa, Ontario). Immature mites that could not be identified to species were included in the abundance count, but excluded from the species richness count. Data analysis The parameters used to describe mite communities were population density (individualssample 1 ) and species richness (number of speciessample 1 ). Statistical analyses were conducted separately for Oribatida and Gamasina using SAS 9.2 (Statistical Analysis System, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). To reduce variance heterogeneity associated with count data, the data sets were log (x + 1) transformed prior to analysis. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences between 1997 and 1998 baseline samplings. The 1999 experiment was analyzed using SAS MIXED procedure for split plots, to determine the effect of whole plot factor (presence or absence of cover crop), the effect of subplot factor (herbicide presence and type), and possible interaction effects. Effects of individual herbicides were investigated as linear contrasts by comparison with the experimental control; the Tukey Kramer procedure was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. The blocked multiresponse permutation procedures (MRBP in PC-Ord, MjM Software, version 4.41) were used to analyse compositional similarity between mite communities in different herbicide treatments (see McCune and Grace 2002). The MRBP is a non-parametric procedure that tests the hypothesis of no difference between two or more groups (McCune and Grace 2002). We applied MRBP to species abundance matrices using the Euclidean distance as similarity measure, and using experimental treatments as groups. MRBP analysis calculates the chance-corrected within-group agreement statistic (A), which ranges from 1 to 1. Low A values (<0.1) indicate that no substantial differences exist between communities (McCune and Grace 2002). The nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS in PC-Ord 4.41) was used to display relationships between mite species and experimental treatments; species with low abundance (less than 10 individuals) were not included in the ordination. The response of individual species to different herbicide treatments was analysed as linear contrasts if the MRBP suggested that there was a significant difference between treatments. All statistical tests were conducted at the level of significance = 0.05. Results The density (F [1,116] = 0.03, p = 0.853, Fig. 1) and species richness (F [1,116] = 0.62, p = 0.432, Fig. 2) of gamasine Fig. 1. Mean density of (a) Gamasina and (b) Oribatida in herbicide experiment site, willow biomass crop, New York, 1997. Open and closed arrows indicate the 1998 site preparation and the 1999 herbicide experiment, respectively. Error bars are the 95% confidence intervals. mites did not differ significantly between October 1997 and October 1998. The density of Oribatida (approx. 2200 individualsm 2 ) also remained stable (Fig. 1), although their species richness declined in 1998 following site preparation (F [1,116] = 4.25, p = 0.041; Fig. 2). Effect of pre-emergent herbicides on density or species richness of Gamasina was not detected in the 1999 experiment, either 60 or 150 days after application (Table 1). By contrast, the species richness and population density of Oribatida were reduced by pre-emergent herbicides both 60 and 150 days after application. Presence of rye cover crop residues had a very strong positive effect on both groups of

1064 Can. J. For. Res. Vol. 38, 2008 Fig. 2. Mean species richness of (a) Gamasina and (b) Oribatida in herbicide experiment site, willow biomass crop, New York, 1997. Open and closed arrows indicate the 1998 site preparation and the 1999 herbicide experiment, respectively. Error bars are the 95% confidence intervals. mites (Table 1; Figs. 1 and 2). A significant interaction term indicated that the effect of herbicides on Oribatida was mitigated in plots with cover crop residue (Table 1). Among different pre-emergent herbicides, significant negative effect of oxyfluorfen on both groups was detected 60 days after application in disked plots (Figs. 3 and 4). Azafenidin reduced density and richness of Oribatida both 60 and 150 days after application in plots with a rye cover crop. The imazaquin pendimethalin mixture had no significant effect on soil Gamasina and Oribatida (Figs. 3 and 4). Collectively, 19 species of Gamasina and 26 species of Oribatida were represented in the samples. The total species richness declined dramatically following the onset of site preparation; 10 species of Gamasina and 18 species of Oribatida in 1997 were reduced to 5 and 6 species, respectively, in October 1998 (Tables 2 and 3). Seven gamasine species, including surface-dwelling genera Pergamasus and Veigaia, were found only in the first baseline sampling in 1997, while the deep-soil dwelling genera Rhodacarus, Rhodacarellus, and Protogamasellus were found only in postherbicide samplings (Table 2). Eight oribatid species, including such local rarities as Masthermannia mammilaris (Berlese) and Eremobelba leporoides Jacot, were found only in the first baseline sampling. Seven Oribatida species were found only in postherbicide samplings (Table 3). Only rye cover crop plots were analysed for the effect of herbicide on mite assemblages and abundance of individual species, as the counts in disked plots were too low. There was no significant relationship between Gamasina community structure and type and (or) presence of herbicide (MRBP: July A = 0.03, p = 0.344; October A = 0.01, p = 0.424), possibly because of the overall low numbers of mites. By contrast, the Oribatida assemblages were influenced by plot treatments at 60 days past application (A = 0.19, p = 0.048), although the assemblages under three herbicide types did not differ significantly (A = 0.24, p = 0.072). At 150 days past application, the Oribatida assemblages were influenced by both herbicide presence (A = 0.02, p = 0.038) and herbicide type (A = 0.72, p = 0.027). Responses to herbicides were herbicide- and speciesspecific. At 60 days past application, the dominant oribatids Tectocepheus velatus (Michael) and Oppiella nova (Oudemans) were significantly less abundant in herbicide-treated plots (pooled herbicide treatments, T. velatus F [3,42] = 6.06, p = 0.002; O. nova F [3,42] = 2.85, p = 0.049). At 150 days past application, T. velatus (F [3,42] = 3.57, p = 0.022), Sellnickochthonius immaculatus (Forsslund) (F [3,42] = 5.90, p = 0.002), and Liochthonius lapponicus (Trägårdh) (F [3,42] = 2.85, p = 0.048) were significantly less abundant in herbicide-treated plots. The NMS ordination (Fig. 5) suggested that most of Gamasina and Oribatida abundant in 1999 experimental plots were generalist species, not strongly associated with a particular treatment. Positive effects were seen in some species: density of gamasine Rhodacarus denticulatus Berlese was highest in imazaquin pendimethalin-treated plots (pooled 1999 data, F [1,90] = 9.09, p = 0.003); Scheloribates laevigatus (Koch) had highest numbers in oxyfluorfen-treated plots (F [1,90] = 25.27, p < 0.001). The most sensitive species, which declined significantly in all herbicide-treated plots, were Brachychthoniidae oribatids: S. immaculatus and L. lapponicus (S. immaculatus: azafenidin F [1,90] = 12.43, p = 0.001; oxyfluorfen F [1,90] = 11.18, p = 0.001; imazaquin pendimethalin F [1,90] = 10.0, p = 0.002; L. lapponicus: azafenidin F [1,90] = 7.82, p = 0.006; oxyfluorfen F [1,90] = 6.02, p = 0.016; imazaquin pendimethalin F [1,90] = 7.82, p = 0.006). Liochthonius lapponicus and the confamilial Brachychthonius berlesei Willmann associated with the control treatment in the NMS ordination (Fig. 5). Among tested herbicides, azafenidin had the most detrimental effect on Oribatida (Fig. 5); in addition to S. immaculatus and L. lapponicus, the numbers of T. velatus (F [1,90] = 19.96, p < 0.001) and

Minor and Norton 1065 Table 1. Effect of herbicide treatments (pooled subplots) and cover crop on mean density (individualssample 1 ) and species richness (speciessample 1 ) of Gamasina and Oribatida in soil under willow biomass crop, New York (1999). Density Richness Group Treatment Effect 60 dpa 150 dpa 60 dpa 150 dpa Gamasina Cover crop Positive 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Herbicide None 0.384 0.823 0.116 0.634 Cover crop herbicide Interaction 0.236 0.696 0.086 0.892 Oribatida Cover crop Positive 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Herbicide Negative 0.004 0.020 0.008 0.002 Cover crop herbicide Interaction 0.014 0.252 0.012 0.128 Note: dpa, days postapplication (herbicide); p values for the hypothesis of no effect. Fig. 3. Density of Gamasina (a and b) and Oribatida (c and d) in experimental treatments, willow biomass crop, New York. Back-transformed means of log-transformed data: disk, disked plots; rye, rye cover crop plots; control, no herbicide; mix, imazaquin + pendimethalin mixture. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (LS means, multiple means comparison, Tukey Kramer adjustment, p < 0.05). *, significantly different from control (LS means contrast, F [1,44] = 6.98, p = 0.011). O. nova (F [1,90] = 9.89, p = 0.023) were significantly reduced in azafenidin-treated plots. Discussion Herbicide effects The observed impact of herbicides on soil mites can be related to the herbicide activity and persistence in soil, and the timing of the sampling. The herbicides used in our study are moderately persistent in soil, with an estimated average field half-life of <70 d (Weed Science Society of America 1994; Smith et al. 2005). The short life span and high mobility of Gamasina (relative to Oribatida) may explain why no clear effects of herbicide on these mites were detected. Other studies suggest that Gamasina can be negatively affected by application of herbicides (Koehler 1994), or may show no effect (Salminen et al. 1997). Minor et al. (2004) found no effect of pre-emergent herbicide (oxyfluorofen, 1.1 kg a.i.ha 1 ) on Gamasina 1 year following the herbicide application in short-rotation forestry (SRF) willows. Consistent with our observations, others have shown that Oribatida are negatively affected by herbicides, although the effects on abundance may be short-lived. The typical pattern is a sharp drop in population density of oribatid mites in response to herbicide application, sometimes followed by a brief increase in density; finally, the populations return to control

1066 Can. J. For. Res. Vol. 38, 2008 Fig. 4. Species richness of Gamasina (a and b) and Oribatida (c and d) in experimental treatments, willow biomass crop, New York. Backtransformed means of log-transformed data: disk, disked plots; rye, rye cover crop plots; control, no herbicide; mix, imazaquin + pendimethalin mixture. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (LS means, multiple means comparison, Tukey Kramer adjustment, p < 0.05). *, significantly different from control (LS means contrast, F [1,44] = 6.43, p = 0.014). Table 2. Total abundance of Gamasina: first baseline sampling (1997), second baseline sampling (1998), and herbicide experiment (1999), willow biomass crop, New York. Species 1997 1998 July 1999 Oct. 1999 Pergamasus crassipes (L., 1758) 9 Pergamasus runcatellus (Berlese, 1903) 2 Pergamasus digitulus Karg, 1963 1 Veigaia pusilla (Berlese, 1916) 2 Rhodacarus denticulatus Berlese, 1920 23 Rhodacarellus silesiacus Willmann, 1936 1 Protogamasellus mica (Athias-Henriot, 1961) 1 151 1 Gamasellodes bicolor (Berlese, 1918) 2 1 2 Arctoseius cetratus (Sellnick, 1940) 5 20 47 32 Proctolaelaps (Paraproctolaelaps) orientalis (Chant, 1963) 1 Neoseiulus agrestis (Karg, 1960) 2 161 4 Hypoaspis (Geolaelaps) angusta Karg, 1965 8 9 7 Hypoaspis (Cosmolaelaps) vacua (Michael, 1891) 1 Hypoaspis (Cosmolaelaps) sp. 1 Dendrolaelaps sp. A 2 Dendrolaelaps sp. B 1 Macrocheles canadensis Banks, 1912 1 Antennoseius nr. bacatus Athias-Henriot, 1961 1 Antennoseius sp. 3 1 No. of samples 60 60 96 96 Total no. of Gamasina individuals 32 34 396 41 Total no. of species 10 5 10 6

Minor and Norton 1067 Table 3. Total abundance of Oribatida: first baseline sampling (1997), second baseline sampling (1998), and herbicide experiment (1999), willow biomass crop, New York. Species 1997 1998 July 1999 Oct. 1999 Tectocepheus velatus (Michael, 1880) 126 209 1324 2955 Oppiella nova (Oudemans, 1902) 25 32 42 23 Scheloribates laevigatus (C.L. Koch, 1836) 13 3 9 1 Scheloribates labyrinthicus Jeleva, 1962 1 Scheloribates sp. A 54 1 3 Scheloribates sp. B 1 Scheloribates sp. C 1 1 Rhysotritia ardua (C.L. Koch, 1841) 7 5 Masthermannia mammilaris (Berlese, 1904) 1 Cultroribula divergens Jacot, 1939 2 Epilohmannia minuta Berlese, 1920 1 Ramusella (Insculptoppia) insculpta (Paoli, 1908) 1 Microppia minus (Paoli, 1908) 5 2 4 2 Punctoribates punctum (C.L. Koch, 1839) 7 1 Eremobelba leporoides Jacot, 1938 1 Suctobelbella sp. A 1 Suctobelbella sp. B 1 Suctobelbella sp. C 1 1 Eniochthonius minutissimus (Berlese, 1904) 2 Podoribates pratensis (Banks, 1895) 7 Sellnickochthonius immaculatus (Forsslund, 1942) 9 3 84 65 Liochthonius lapponicus (Trägårdh, 1910) 2 13 Brachychthonius berlesei Willmann, 1928 1 2 1 12 Sellnickochthonius zelawaiensis (Sellnick, 1928) 1 Poecilochthonius spiciger (Berlese, 1910) 3 Oripodidae gen. sp. 1 No. of samples 60 60 96 96 Total no. of Oribatida individuals 251 251 1412 3093 No. of species 18 6 11 16 level within several months (Moore et al. 1984; Tsonev and Furnadzhieva 1984). Other effects can be more persistent; weed control (oxyfluorofen at 1.1 kg a.i.ha 1 ) had significantly reduced diversity (but not density) of Oribatida 1 year following the herbicide application in SRF willows (Minor et al. 2004). The information on direct toxicity of specific pre-emergent herbicides to soil arthropods is very scarce. Oxyfluorfen, pendimethalin, imazaquin, and azafenidin are nontoxic to honeybees at recommended application rates (WSSA 1994). However, Milligan (2000) showed that survival and reproduction in Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (a plant-dwelling gamasine mite) was affected by oxyfluorfen at a concentration equivalent to 235 g a.i.ha 1, which is about 150% of the typical field application rate. The negative effect of herbicides on Oribatida was greatly mitigated in plots with cover crop residue. The microbial activity is stimulated under cover crop residues (Reddy et al. 2003), which possibly contributed to the degradation of herbicides. Pendimethalin, imazaquin, and azafenidin are rapidly inactivated through microbial degradation (Singh and Kulshrestha 1991; Delaney and Morton 1996; Flint and Witt 1997). In addition, soil organic matter accumulates under cover crop residues (Reddy et al. 2003). Soil organic matter creates additional herbicide adsorption sites, which would reduce the herbicide release into soil solution, and therefore its toxicity (Locke and Bryson 1997). Oxyfluorfen is not subject to significant microbial degradation but is especially readily adsorbed (Weed Science Society of America 1994), which may explain why significant negative effect of oxyfluorfen on both Oribatida and Gamasina was detected in disked plots but not in cover crop plots. Effects of disking and rye cover crop The strong positive effect of cover crop residues on both Gamasina and Oribatida can be attributed to the favorable microenvironment created by the rye residue, combined with the absence of tillage in cover crop plots. The no-till cover crop plots had the thick layer of organic matter from the dead rye, while disked plots had practically no surface litter. Reeleder et al. (2006) observed similar increase in Gamasina and Oribatida under a no-till rye cover crop. Rye cover crop had no obvious effect on mite communities in Minor et al. (2004) study in SRF willows, but in that experiment the cover crop was disked under, instead of forming a surface mat. Taylor and Wolters (2005) found that densities of the dominant oribatid taxa correlate strongly with microbial biomass and water content of the litter. In agricultural systems, a surface layer of crop residue was found to aid in soil moisture retention during droughty periods, and to reduce daily soil temperature amplitudes (Dormaar and Carefoot 1996). Density of soil fungi is higher under no-till management and under crop residue left on the soil surface (Reddy et al.

1068 Can. J. For. Res. Vol. 38, 2008 Fig. 5. Ordination of experimental treatments in species space for (a) Gamasina and (b) Oribatida, willow biomass crop, New York. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling, pooled 1999 data, rare species excluded. Control, no herbicide; Mix, imazaquin + pendimethalin mixture. Gamasina: Ace, A. cetratus; Han, H. angusta; Nag, N. agrestis; Pmi, P. mica; Rde, R. denticulatus. Oribatida: Bbe, B. berlesei; Lla, L. lapponicus; Ono, O. nova; Rar, R. ardua; Sim, S. immaculatus; Sla, S. laevigatus; Tve, T. velatus. 2003), so our cover crop plots probably had more available food resources. Tectocepheus velatus, which dominated the oribatid community in cover crop plots, is a ubiquitous early colonizer species with wide ecological range, known to feed on a variety of resources. Luxton (1972) classified it as a mycophage, but Schneider et al. (2004a) found that the 15 N stable isotope signature of T. velatus was similar to that of the L/F litter layer, and suggested that T. velatus may feed predominantly on litter in some situations. A species with short life cycle and parthenogenetic reproduction (Luxton 1981), T. velatus can quickly establish populations of considerable size in favourable conditions, reaching a tremendous population density (up to 628 in a 5 cm 3 sample) under the thick mat of rye residue in our cover crop plots. Oppiella nova, another widespread parthenogenetic oribatid mite, feeds on fungi (Luxton 1972). While O. nova was also a dominant, it did not approach the densities of T. velatus in cover crop plots. Tillage has effects opposite to those of crop residues; it disrupts soil structure, and promotes faster drying and wider temperature fluctuations in the surface soil. The decline in gamasine and oribatid populations in tilled soil is well documented (Wardle 1995; Hülsmann and Wolters 1998). Comparing with no-till treatment, tillage decreased density and diversity of Gamasina during the establishment of SRF willows (Minor et al. 2004). Overall, the more stable microclimate, higher moisture retention, and a richer resource base created by surface rye residue probably contributed to the significantly higher densities of Oribatida and Gamasina in cover crop plots in our experiment. The severe summer drought at the study site, to which oribatid mites are particularly sensitive (Lindberg et al. 2002), may have further contributed to their low abundance in disked plots. Community composition Anderson (1978) suggested that the structure of soil mite communities relates strongly to structural and nutritional properties of a substrate. In addition to possible direct toxicity, pre-emergent herbicides can influence the Oribatida community indirectly, by altering trophic interactions with fungi and bacteria (Salminen et al. 1997), for example, if herbicides alter the community structure of microbes that either comprise the oribatid s food or degrade plant residues to the point of palatability. There is evidence (see recent review by Strandberg and Scott-Fordsmand 2004) that application of a herbicide (pendimethalin) can cause significant reduction in abundance and activity of soil fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes, although these declines frequently are short term (4 6 weeks). By contrast, other studies cited by these authors reported no effects of pendimethalin on fungi and bacteria. Azafenidin, while not decreasing the total number of microorganisms, can have specific negative effects on soil bacteria and actinomycetes, cause persistent changes in microbial community structure (Milanova et al. 2005), alter functional diversity of soil microbes, and, in vitro, inhibit mycelial growth of some fungi (Daugrois et al. 2005). Such influences on community structure may underlie the detrimental effects of azafenidin on certain oribatid species (T. velatus, O. nova, and Brachychthoniidae), since fungi vary widely in their palatability to these and other soil fungivores (Maraun et al. 1998a; Schneider et al. 2004b). The oribatid S. laevigatus, which reached high density in one of oxyfluorfen-treated rye cover plots, is a generalist able to feed on a variety of resources: fungi, fungal spores, green algae, and plant litter material (Luxton 1972; Schneider et al. 2004a). Although there was no direct effect of herbicides on abundance or species richness of Gamasina, their community shifted from larger surface-dwelling species towards smaller euedaphic Rhodacaridae (R. denticulatus, Rhodacarellus silesiacus Willmann, and Protogamasellus mica (Athias-Henriot)) following the first application of glyphosate, and further towards euedaphic R. denticulatus and

Minor and Norton 1069 P. mica in imazaquin pendimethalin- and oxyfluorfentreated plots. A shift in soil microarthropod assemblages towards euedaphic species often follows application of a toxic substance or a contaminant to the soil surface (Filser et al. 2000; Minor and Norton 2004). Conclusions Previous studies had demonstrated that tillage and weed control practices in short-rotation forestry are the critical factors influencing density, species richness, and community composition of soil mites (Minor et al. 2004; Minor and Norton 2004). Unfortunately, in such systems it is often difficult to separate the effects of individual factors (soil cultivation, direct and indirect effects of agrochemicals, and plant biomass) on soil organisms, and the literature dealing with effects of agricultural practices on soil microarthropods is often contradictory (Wardle 1995). Our study shows, for example, that when weed and erosion control measures are combined, the effect on soil microarthropods is not additive. Our study also suggests that the impacts of soil-applied herbicides on non-target soil organisms cannot be generalized; herbicides may reduce mite diversity and produce changes in community structure, but the response is highly herbicide- and species-specific; the total mite abundance may or may not be affected. The abundance-only approach may not be a reliable way of evaluating herbicide impact on soil fauna, and the herbicide-induced changes in community structure and diversity should be recorded; there is evidence, for example, that the effect of Oribatida on decomposition processes in soil is linked to their community composition and the trophic preferences of dominant species (Siepel and Maaskamp 1994). We suggest that the sensitivity of Oribatida to herbicides is an indirect reflection of herbicide impacts on soil microorganisms. Future research should aim to separate the direct and indirect effects of herbicide toxicity; particularly, shifts in microbial species composition and species diversity and their impact on higher trophic levels should be more fully investigated. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr. Evert Lindquist (the Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arachnids, Ottawa, Canada) for checking identifications of Gamasina and for help with identification of difficult species. We also thank Dr. Timothy Volk (State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF), Syracuse, USA) for information on SRF willow management and many discussions, and Dr. Lawrence Abrahamson (SUNY- ESF, Syracuse, USA) for his support of the project. This research was funded by the Biomass for Rural Development Project, sponsored by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and the United States Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. References Abrahamson, L.P., Volk, T.A., Kopp, R.F., White, E.H., and Ballard, J.L. 2002. Willow biomass producer s handbook. New York State Energy Research and Development Agency, Syracuse, N.Y. Anderson, J.M. 1978. Inter- and intra- habitat relationships between woodland Cryptostigmata species diversity and the diversity of soil and litter microhabitats. Oecologia (Berl.), 32: 341 348. doi:10.1007/bf00345112. Bardgett, R.D., and Chan, K.F. 1999. Experimental evidence that soil fauna enhance nutrient mineralization and plant nutrient uptake in montane grassland ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 1007 1014. doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(99)00014-0. Cragg, R., and Bardgett, R.D. 2001. How changes in soil faunal diversity and composition within a trophic group influence decomposition processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33: 2073 2081. doi:10. 1016/S0038-0717(01)00138-9. Daugrois, J.H., Hoy, J.W., and Griffin, J.L. 2005. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor herbicide effects on Pythium root rot of sugarcane, Pythium species, and the soil microbial community. Phytopathology, 95: 220 226. doi:10.1094/phyto-95-0220. Delaney, S.D., and Morton, C.S. 1996. A new broad-spectrum herbicide for citrus. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 109: 51 52. Dormaar, J.F., and Carefoot, J.M. 1996. Implications of crop residue management and conservation tillage on soil organic matter. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76: 627 634. Filser, J., Wittmann, R., and Lang, A. 2000. Response types in Collembola towards copper in the microenvironment. Environ. Pollut. 107: 71 78. doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00130-x. PMID: 15093010. Flint, J.L., and Witt, W.W. 1997. Microbial degradation of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 45: 586 591. Hogervorst, R.F., Verhoef, H.A., and van Straalen, N.M. 1993. 5- year trends in soil arthropod densities in pine forest with various levels of vitality. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 15: 189 195. doi:10.1007/ BF00361610. Hülsmann, A., and Wolters, V. 1998. The effects of different tillage practices on soil mites, with particular reference to Oribatida. Appl. Soil Ecol. 9: 327 332. doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(98) 00084-5. Hutton, F.Z., Jr., and Rice, C.E. 1977. Soil survey of Onondaga County, New York. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Ingham, R.E., Trofymow, J.A., Ingham, E.R., and Coleman, D.C. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol. Monogr. 55: 119 140. doi:10.2307/1942528. Johnston, J.M., and Crossley, D.A., Jr. 2002. Forest ecosystem recovery in the southeast US: soil ecology as an essential component of ecosystem management. For. Ecol. Manage. 155: 187 203. doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00558-8. Koehler, H.H. 1992. The use of soil mesofauna for the judgement of chemical impact on ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40: 193 205. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(92)90092-p. Koehler, H.H. 1994. A case study on bioindication and its use for the assessment of ecological impact. In Ecotoxicology of soil organisms. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 427 444. Koehler, H.H. 1997. Mesostigmata (Gamasina, Uropodina), efficient predators in agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 62: 105 117. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01141-3. Lindberg, N., Bengtsson, J., and Persson, T. 2002. Effects of experimental irrigation and drought on the composition and diversity of soil fauna in a coniferous stand. J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 924 936. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00769.x. Locke, M.A., and Bryson, C.T. 1997. Herbicide soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Sci. 45: 307 320. Luxton, M. 1972. Studies on the oribatid mites of a Danish beech wood soil I. Nutritional biology. Pedobiologia (Jena), 12: 434 463.

1070 Can. J. For. Res. Vol. 38, 2008 Luxton, M. 1981. Studies on the Oribatid mites of a Danish Beech wood soil. IV. Developmental biology. Pedobiologia (Jena), 21: 312 340. Maraun, M., Migge, S., Schaefer, M., and Scheu, S. 1998a. Selection of microfungal food by six oribatid mite species (Oribatida, Acari) from two different beech forests. Pedobiologia (Jena), 42: 232 240. Maraun, M., Visser, S., and Scheu, S. 1998b. Oribatid mites enhance the recovery of the microbial community after a strong disturbance. Appl. Soil Ecol. 9: 175 181. doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(98)00072-9. McCune, B., and Grace, J.B. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Ore. Milanova, S.D., Baeva, G., and Maneva, S. 2005. Movement, persistence and microbial effect of azafenidin in soil. Herbologia, 6: 55 64. Milligan, D. 2000. Goal 4F (AKA Goal 480 SC) Herbicide: Laboratory contact toxicity test with the predacious mite, Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Final report: Lab project 99RC-0218: 1007.057.268: 99P-218. Unpublished study prepared by Springborn Labs. (Europe) AG. MRID 45271303. Cited in Anatra-Cordone, M., King, C., Klotzbach, J., Durkin, P.R., 2005. Oxyfluorfen - Human health and ecological risk assessment - Final report (December 22, 2005). USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, GSA Contract GS-10F-0082F. USDA For. Serv. BPA: WO-01-3187-0150. Minor, M.A., and Norton, R.A. 2004. Effects of soil amendments on assemblages of soil mites (Acari: Oribatida, Mesostigmata) in short-rotation willow plantings in Central New York. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1417 1425. doi:10.1139/x04-035. Minor, M.A., Volk, T.A., and Norton, R.A. 2004. Effects of site preparation techniques on communities of soil mites (Acari: Oribatida, Acari: Gamasida) under short-rotation forestry plantings in New York, USA. Appl. Soil Ecol. 25: 181 192. doi:10.1016/ j.apsoil.2003.10.002. Moore, J.C., Snider, R.J., and Robertson, L.S. 1984. Effects of different tillage practices on Collembola and Acarina in corn production systems. 1. The effects of no-tillage and Atrazine. Pedobiologia (Jena), 26: 143 152. Prinzing, A., Kretzler, S., Badejo, A., and Beck, L. 2002. Traits of oribatid mite species that tolerate habitat disturbance due to pesticide application. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34: 1655 1661. doi:10. 1016/S0038-0717(02)00149-9. Reddy, K.N., Zablotowicz, R.M., Locke, M.A., and Koger, C.H. 2003. Cover crop, tillage, and herbicides effects on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield. Weed Sci. 51: 987 994. doi:10.1614/p2002-169. Reeleder, R.D., Miller, J.J., Ball Coelho, B.R., and Roy, R.C. 2006. Impacts of tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen on populations of earthworms, microarthropods, and soil fungi in a cultivated fragile soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 33: 243 257. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil. 2005.10.006. Renker, C., Otto, P., Schneider, K., Zimdars, B., Maraun, M., and Buscot, F. 2005. Oribatid mites as potential vectors for soil microfungi: study of mite-associated fungal species. Microb. Ecol. 50: 518 528. doi:10.1007/s00248-005-5017-8. PMID:16333718. Salminen, J., Setala, H., and Haimi, J. 1997. Regulation of decomposer community structure and decomposition processes in herbicide stressed humus soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 6: 265 274. doi:10. 1016/S0929-1393(97)00021-8. Scheu, S., Theenhaus, A., and Jones, T.H. 1999. Links between the detritivore and the herbivore system: effects of earthworms and Collembola on plant growth and aphid development. Oecologia (Berl.), 119: 541 551. doi:10.1007/s004420050817. Schneider, K., Migge, S., Norton, R.A., Scheu, S., Langel, R., Reineking, A., and Maraun, M. 2004a. Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, Acari): evidence from stable isotope ratios ( 15 N/ 14 N). Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 1769 1774. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.033. Schneider, K., Renker, K., Scheu, S., and Maraun, M. 2004b. Feeding biology of oribatid mites: a minireview. Phytophaga (Palermo), 14: 247 256. Siepel, H., and Maaskamp, F. 1994. Mites of different feeding guilds affect decomposition of organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26: 1389 1394. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(94)90222-4. Singh, S.B., and Kulshrestha, G. 1991. Microbial degradation of pendimethalin. J. Environ. Sci. Health B, 26: 309 321. PMID:1894917. Smith, M.C., Shaw, D.R., and Miller, D.K. 2005. In-field bioassay to investigate the persistence of imazaquin and pyrithiobac. Weed Sci. 53: 121 129. doi:10.1614/p2002-155(rev)r. Strandberg, M., and Scott-Fordsmand, J.J. 2004. Effects of pendimethalin at lower trophic levels a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 57: 190 201. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.07.010. PMID: 14759666. Taylor, A.R., and Wolters, V. 2005. Responses of oribatid mite communities to summer drought: the influence of litter type and quality. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37: 2117 2130. doi:10.1016/j. soilbio.2005.03.015. Tsonev, I., and Furnadzhieva, N. 1984. An effect of the herbicide combination of lenacil and etofumezat on oribatid community structure (Oribatei, Acari) in agroecosystems. Godishnik na Sofiiskiya Universitet Kliment Okhridski. Biologicheski Fakultet, 75: 44 52. [in Bulgarian with English abstract.] Volk, T.A., Abrahamson, L.P., Nowak, C.A., Smart, L.B., Tharakan, P.J., and White, E.H. 2006. The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass Bioenergy, 30: 715 727. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.03.001. Wagner, J. 2000. Pre-emergent herbicide screening trials for willow biomass crops. M.Sc. thesis. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, N.Y. Wardle, D.A. 1995. Impacts of disturbance on detritus food webs in agro-ecosystems of contrasting tillage and weed management. In Advances in ecological research. Vol. 26. Academic Press, New York. pp. 105 185. Weed Science Society of America. 1994. Herbicide handbook. 7th ed. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, Ill.