NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE. Rokjin J.

Similar documents
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION. Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park

Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate-nitrateammonium aerosols in the United States: Implications for policy

Weight of Evidence Checklist Update

Attribution of Haze. What Are the Pieces and How Do They Fit? s e. a e

6.0 STATE AND CLASS I AREA SUMMARIES

A comparative study on multi-model numerical simulation of black carbon in East Asia

Climate Change and Air Quality in US National Parks: a new project sponsored by NPS

Visibility and air pollution

Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: A. Ambient PM 2.5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MASS AND COMPOSITION RESPONSES TO CHANGING EMISSIONS

Transport of aerosols: Regional and global implications for air quality (, weather, and climate)

6.0 STATE AND CLASS I AREA SUMMARIES

IDENTIFYING SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS TO VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT USING REGIONAL MODELING TOOLS

6.0 STATE AND CLASS I AREA SUMMARIES

A Goal of the Regional Haze Rule

Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories. Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )

IMPROVE s Evolution. Data Tools Publications Special Studies Education Activities.

Linking regional air pollution with global chemistry and climate: The role of background ozone. Arlene M. Fiore Adviser: Daniel J.

Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility

MOZART Development, Evaluation, and Applications at GFDL

Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program. Contract No. 68-D Work Order No.

Improving Visibility at Class I Areas Regional Haze SIP Requirements

BART DETERMINATION REPORT AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SOUTHWESTERN POWER STATION UNIT 3

Visibility Data Summary for the Northern Cheyenne Tribe

USE OF RPO MODELING TO MEET REGIONAL HAZE AND NAAQS REQUIREMENTS

SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT OF OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATE MATTER TO EMISSIONS UNDER INFLUENCE OF FUTURE CLIMATE AND EMISSIONS CHANGES

SOURCE ALLOCATION AND VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT IN TWO CLASS I AREAS WITH POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION

Enhanced Air Pollution Health Effects Studies Using Source-oriented Chemical Transport Models

BART DETERMINATION REPORT AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMANCHE POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2

EPA Regional Modeling for National Rules (and Beyond) CAIR/ CAMR / BART

Is there need to collect routine ammonia/ammonium measurements in ambient air monitoring networks?

WRAP Regional Haze Analysis & Technical Support System

Effect of global change on ozone air quality in the United States. Shiliang Wu

Background Ozone in Surface Air over the United States: Variability, Climate Linkages, and Policy Implications

Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility

Assessment of aerosol fields over East Asia modeled by CESM with MOSAIC

12. Ozone pollution. Daniel J. Jacob, Atmospheric Chemistry, Harvard University, Spring 2017

Intercontinental transport of pollution and dust aerosols: implications for regional air quality

THE USE OF HUMAN OBSERVED VISUAL RANGE TO ESTIMATE AMBENT ATMOSPHERIC MASS CONCENTRATIONS

CHAPTER 6: SPECIAL MONITORING STUDIES & DATA ANALYSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE IMPROVE PROGRAM

MULTI-COMPONENT AEROSOL TRANSPORT AND RADIATIVE EFFECTS IN LMDZ-GCM Part I

Identification of Significant Sources and Categories Contributing to Regional Haze in Colorado

BART Modeling Protocol for VISTAS

Making sense of air quality. Daniel J. Jacob

4/17/2018. Robert Kotchenruther EPA Region

April 9, Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council. San Francisco, CA

NH3 Emissions for Regional Air Quality Modeling

Lecture 4 Air Pollution: Particulates METR113/ENVS113 SPRING 2011 MARCH 15, 2011

Meeting Summary National RPO Modeling Meeting May 25 and 26, 2004 Denver, Colorado

Hemispheric Transport of Ozone Pollution: Multi-model Assessment of the Role of Methane and the Conventional Ozone Precursors

Global dimensions to ground-level ozone: Transboundary transport and climate change

Technical Support Document for the Minnesota State Implementation Plan for Regional Haze

IMPROVE Report L. Debell,, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm

SOURCE ALLOCATION AND VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT IN TWO CLASS I AREAS WITH POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION

Atmospheric Methane Distribution and Trends: Impacts on Climate and Ozone Air Quality

AoH Report Update. Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November 15-18, Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study

SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies. RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003

An Examination of the Current IMPROVE Algorithm

BIOMASS BURNING CONTRIBUTION TO CARBONACEOUS AEROSOLS IN THE WESTERN U.S. MOUNTAIN RANGES

CONSIDERATIONS AND PROPOSED APPROACH

Chapter 9. Regional Haze Rule Progress Tracking Metrics

The influence of ozone from outside state: Towards cleaner air in Minnesota

Investigation of Fine Particulate Matter Characteristics and Sources in Edmonton, Alberta

WESTERN REGIONAL AIR PARTERNERSHIP REGIONAL HAZE RULE REASONABLE PROGRESS SUMMARY REPORT. Prepared for:

Meteorological Influences on Concentration of Airborne Particulate Matter in Ulsan, Korea

TSS Project Update and Demo of Selected Tools

WestJumpAQMS Progress Report 2008 Base Case and Preliminary Source Apportionment Modeling

Long-Term Strategy for Regional Haze

AN INVESTIGATION OF TRENDS IN CARBONACEOUS AEROSOLS OVER NORTH AMERICA. Sara Torbatian

Estimating aerosol emissions by assimilating aerosol optical depth in a global aerosol model

Tracking Visibility Progress

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT MODELING FOR AIR QUALITY FOR OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENTS UNDER NEPA

OC/EC Aerosol Measurements

Deliverable D2.4.2, type: Report

O3/PM2.5/Regional Haze Modeling Guidance Summary. Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS Western Met, Emissions, and AQ Modeling Workshop June 22, 2011

HTAP Multi-model Assessment of Ozone Source-receptor Relationships. Arlene M. Fiore

Model Evaluation and SIP Modeling

Where There s Smoke There s Haze: Estimating the Contribution of Fire Types to PM2.5 and Haze

Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions. Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007

An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for Ozone/PM2.5/Regional Haze

The Data for Model Performance Evaluation National Climate Data Center (NCDC) contains measurement data of major meteorological parameters such as

NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 3. Descriptive Analysis. Ivar Tombach

Monitoring Data & Glide Path Summary Document

Using Earth System Models to provide better policy-relevant information

Atmospheric Chemistry Air Pollution

Risk and Uncertainties in Anthropogenic. Control over Greenhouse Forcing in the TAR. with a focus on Atmospheric Chemistry

Air Quality and Climate Connections

Quantifying Emissions of Ammonia For Air Quality Analysis

The modification of global atmospheric Nitrogen cycling by human activities. David Fowler Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Edinburgh UK

Multi-Scale Applications of U.S. EPA s Third-Generation Air Quality Modeling System (Models-3/CMAQ)

Aerosol from biomass burning and mineral aerosols. 1. What are aerosols from biomass burning?

Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate

Optical properties of light absorbing organic aerosols(brown carbon) in North Nanjing. Reporter: Bao Mengying

William C. Malm Retired NPS, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 AEROSOL MASS AT GWANGJU, KOREA DURING ASIAN DUST AND BIOMASS BURNING EPISODIC PERIODS IN 2001

CALMET/CALPUFF BART Protocol for Class I Federal Area Individual Source Attribution Visibility Impairment Modeling Analysis

Visibility Trends.

RPO Modeling and NAAQS SIP Modeling

WRF/CMAQ AQMEII3 Simulations of U.S. Regional- Scale Ozone: Sensitivity to Processes and Inputs

WESTAR-WRAP Regional Haze Webinar Series #5 November 16, 2017

Transcription:

NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII, September 5, 2003

EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Federal class I areas (including national parks, other wilderness areas) to return to natural visibility conditions by 2064 State Implementation Plans to be submitted by 2007 for linear improvement in visibility over the 2004-2018 period EPA HAS PROPOSED DEFAULT ESTIMATED NATURAL PM CONCENTRATIONS FOR APPLICATION OF THE REGIONAL HAZE RULE 6 5 4 3 2 Coarse mass (>2.5 um) Soil (<2.5 um) Elemental carbon (EC) Organic carbon (OC) Nitrate Sulfate 12 10 8 6 4 EPA [2001] 1 0 East West PM mass concentration (µg m -3 ) 2 0 Acadia, ME Bandelier, NM Extinction coefficient (Mm -1 ) These defaults are not traceable to actual data in the literature. What do they mean in terms of actual natural vs. anthropogenic influences?

OBJECTIVES and APPROACH Determine present-day natural PM concentrations in the U.S., compare to EPA default values. Determine the contributions from foreign anthropogenic emissions (Canada, Mexico, Asia) to visibility degradation in the U.S. Determine the pervasiveness of natural fires and dust events, particularly from outside the U.S, in decreasing natural visibility in the U.S. Improved emission estimates Start from best a priori estimates of natural and anthropogenic PM sources Conduct global PM simulation with GEOS- CHEM chemical tracer model on 2 o x2.5 o horizontal resolution Evaluate with aerosol data from IMPROVE, CASTNET, other networks Assessment of EPA default estimated natural PM concentrations Conduct sensitivity simulations Assessment of transboundary pollution influences

CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL SIMULATION Best a priori sources (1998) ORGANIC CARBON (OC) ELEMENTAL CARBON (EC) GLOBAL 130 Tg yr -1 Fossil fuel Biofuel Biomass burning Vegetation 22 Tg yr -1 UNITED STATES 2.7 Tg yr -1 0.66 Tg yr -1

ANNUAL MEAN OC AND EC (1998): GEOS-CHEM vs. IMPROVE (45 sites) High OC in southeast U.S.: vegetation High OC in Mexico, Canada: fires 45 sites

LEAST-SQUARES SQUARES FIT OF MODEL TO OBSERVATIONS GENERATES OPTIMIZED A POSTERIORI SOURCES Fossil fuel!15% Biofuel!65% Biomass burning "17% Biogenic!11%

CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL IN THE U.S.: contributions from natural sources and transboundary pollution Annual regional means from GEOS-CHEM standard and sensitivity simulations Baseline (1998) Zero anthropogenic emissions in U.S. GEOS-CHEM (w/ climatological fires) EPA default values Contributions from transboundary anthropogenic sources Canada and Mexico Asia OC (µg m -3 as OMC) West East 2.0 1.3 0.5 0.05 0.013 3.2 1.2 1.4 0.05 0.007 EC (µg m -3 ) West East 0.30 0.68 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.005 0.003 We find that EPA default natural concentrations are too low by factors of 2-3 except for OC in eastern U.S. quantifying fire influences is critical Transboundary pollution influences are relatively small except for EC from Canada/Mexico

H 2 SO 4 -HNO 3 -NH 3 -H 2 O AEROSOL SIMULATION GEOS-CHEM emissions (2001) GLOBAL UNITED STATES 78 Industrial 8.3 Sulfur, Tg S yr -1 Volcanoes Biomass burning Oceans Ammonia, Tg N yr -1 NO x, Tg N yr -1 55 43 Livestock Fertilizer Humans Industry Biofuels Soils/vegetation Oceans Biomass burning Fossil fuel Fertilizer Biofuel Lightning Soils Biomass burning 2.8 7.4

ANNUAL MEAN SULFATE (2001): GEOS-CHEM vs. IMPROVE (141 sites) Highest concentrations in industrial Midwest (coal-fired power plants) High correlation for different seasons (R 2 = 0.79-0.94) No significant model bias (Slope = 0.71-1.02) except in summer (=0.71) (excessive scavenging of SO 2 in convective updrafts?)

ANNUAL MEAN AMMONIUM AND NITRATE (2001): GEOS-CHEM vs. CASTNET (79 sites) (no ammonium data at IMPROVE sites) Highest concentrations in upper Midwest High correlation for different seasons (R 2 = 0.82-0.90) High bias for NH 4 + in fall: error in seasonal variation of livestock emissions R 2 = 0.36-0.66 except for summer High bias for NO 3-, esp. in summer/fall, results from bias on [SO 4 2- ]-2[NH 4+ ]

SEASONAL VARIATION OF AEROSOL ACIDITY CASTNET sites CASTNET Aerosol is mostly neutralized (highest acidity in eastern U.S. in summer); aerosol phase is therefore a major issue for visibility assessment Except in the upper Midwest, NH 4 NO 3 formation is limited by NH 3 rather than by HNO 3 availability # better knowledge of NH 3 emissions is critical GEOS-CHEM

INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF ASIAN AND NORTH AMERICAN ANTHROPOGENIC SULFATE As determined from GEOS-CHEM 2001 sensitivity simulations with these sources shut off

SULFATE-NITRATE NITRATE-AMMONIUM AMMONIUM AEROSOL IN THE U.S.: contributions from natural sources and transboundary pollution Annual regional means from GEOS-CHEM standard and sensitivity simulations Ammonium sulfate (µg m -3 ) West East Ammonium nitrate (µg m -3 ) West East Baseline (2001) 1.52 4.11 1.53 3.26 Zero anthropogenic emisions in U.S. GEOS-CHEM EPA default values 0.43 0.11 0.38 0.23 0.27 0.1 0.37 0.1 Contributions from transboundary anthropogenic sources Canada and Mexico Asia 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.20-0.02 0.25-0.02 Achievability of EPA default estimates is compromised by transboundary pollution influences Transboundary pollution influence from Asia is comparable in magnitude to that from Canada + Mexico

CONSEQUENCES FOR 2004-2018 2018 IMPLEMENTATION OF EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Visibility (deciviews: dv = 10ln(b ext /10) WEST EAST Baseline dv (current conditions) Estimated natural dv EPA default This work Required improvement in dv, 2004-2018 using EPA default using this work Required % improvement in b ext, 2004-2018: using EPA default using this work 15.6 4.7 8.8 2.5 1.6 21% 13% 22 7.4 8.8 3.4 3.1 29% 27% Illustrative calculation assuming f(rh) = 2 (west) or 3 (east), adopting EPA default values for dust, and using mean eastern/western U.S. PM concentrations.