Engineer s Report. Santa Clara Valley Water District California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project Project No

Similar documents
California Water Commission. June 28, 2018

Report. Water Resources Management Water Transfer and Exchange Transactions. Summary. Attachments. Detailed Report

Semitropic Stored Water Recovery Unit Special Study Report

The Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project

Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Investigation Update on Draft Feasibility Report and State Funding Application

Purpose, Need and Objectives for the Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project

Metropolitan Water District. July 25, 2013

Investigation Highlights

Montecito Water District Desalination Facilities Status Update. Board of Directors Meeting March 17, 2015

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA WATERFIX AND CALIFORNIA ECO RESTORE

Report Documenting the Reasonableness of the Conjunctive Use Benefit of Surface Water and Recycled Water to Groundwater Customers

Los Angeles 3 rd Regional

Water and Power Policy Group

Amendment to EBMUD Retirement System Ordinance (No. 40) - Section 21 First Reading. Board of Directors March 10, 2015

Water Banking Projects Update for Municipal Water District of Orange County

Sierra Mountains. LA Aqueduct. Supplies Conservation

Long-Term Recapture and Recirculation of Restoration Flows Environmental Impact Statement. Public Scoping Meeting

Hollister Urban Area Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update

Section V: Water Accounting and Water Supply Reliability

Freeport Regional Water Authority. c/o Gregg Ellis 2600 V Street Sacramento, CA 95818

State Water Resources Control Board

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT REVERSE FLOW

MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SHORTAGE POLICY CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT, CALIFORNIA Environmental Assessment

Section V: Water Accounting and Water Supply Reliability

POTABLE REUSE PLANNING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM MODELING REPORT

KERN COUNTY ECONOMIC SUMMIT THE FUTURE OF WATER AND ITS ECONOMIC IMPACT

San Francisco Water PowerS<

Regional water wholesaler Serves 6 counties, 19 million people Growth: 170,000 people/yr. $1 trillion regional economy

Jose Gutierrez - Chief Operating Officer. Water Education Foundation, April 4,2019

Chapter 8 National Economic Development and Locally Preferred Alternative

Putting Title 22 Water to Beneficial Use in the Central Valley

California League of Cities Briefing on Water Supply Issues

ZEBRA MUSSEL PROJECT STATUS

BAWSCA-EBMUD Short-Term Pilot Water Transfer Plan. September 2013

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting

Revised 8-4. Board of Directors Water Planning and Stewardship Committee. September 11, 2007 Board Meeting. Subject. Description

Friant Dam and Millerton Reservoir

CHAPTER 7 POWER PRODUCTION AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION

ECONOMICS OF SUSTAINABLE WATER REUSE IN THE NAPA VALLEY

A Retrospective Estimate of the Economic Impacts of Reduced Water Supplies to the San Joaquin Valley in 2009

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:

Frequently Asked Questions Updated July 17, 2015

NOTICE OF PREPARATION. Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Kern Water Bank Conservation and Storage Project

Project Labor Agreements. Board Meeting February 11, 2014

Climate Change and the Future of Groundwater in California: Conjunctive-Use and Aquifer Recharge

Kern Water Bank. Kern Water Bank Authority

C I R P A C P R E S E N T A T I O N B Y R O N T H O M P S O N J U N E 1 6,

A7. Economic Analysis Water Supply Cost and Benefits

Irrigation District Efficiencies and Potential Water Savings in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas

AGENDA DATE: November 14, 2018

SUMMARY OF METROPOLITAN S RESPONSES TO COMMENTS REGARDING METROPOLITAN S DRAFT 2015 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

3.14. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

Section V: Water Accounting and Water Supply Reliability

Water Supply Board Briefing. Water Operations Department March 22, 2016

2013 WATER RESOURCES SERVICE RELIABILITY REPORT AND. El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, California 95667

WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Cross Valley Canal Contractors

Appendix B PLANNING AND OPERATION COORDINATION FOR THE VERNALIS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN

PROPOSAL OF, a corporation. an individual doing business as

1. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION

MEMORANDUM FC 14 ( )

3.2 SURFACE WATER RESOURCES

California Water: Looking to the Future. Statistical Appendix

Poso Creek. Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

Water Supply Planning for the Morongo Basin Area

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion

California Urban Water Agencies Water Supply Reliability Report

California s Water Market, By the Numbers: Update 2012

3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

Water Supply Study for the Lyons Canyon Project

Study Authorization The Federal government received initial study authorization in 2003 under Public Law (P.L.) 108-7, which states,

Chapter 2 Project Objectives and Purpose and Need

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS...

Executive Summary. ES.1 Introduction

Administrative Final 1

Update on California WaterFix and Metropolitan Water District s (MWD s) Review Process (Presentation)

2.1 Overview. Chapter 2 Project Objectives and Purpose and Need

Drinking Water Source Assessment. Patterson Pass Water Treatment Plant Intake on South Bay Aqueduct

A Tale of Two Dams and a dry river. November 1, 2011 Planning, Resources and Technology Committee Mojave Water Agency

California WaterFix (Alternative 4A)/Recirculated Environmental Analysis Frequently Asked Questions

Santa Barbara County Region

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OFA PARTIALLY REVISED, RECIRCULATED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING FOR THE FRIANT RANCH PROJECT

2016 WATER RESOURCES SERVICE RELIABILITY REPORT AND. El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, California 95667

Presented at the annual technical conference of The Irrigation Association San Antonio, Texas December 2, 2009

California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 (Proposition 68) Item 5.7

SLIDES: Status of Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA): Third Intake into Lake Mead and Groundwater Project

Shortage on the Colorado River: Analysis of Impacts to Water Users in Central Arizona. Ken Seasholes

San Diego County Water Authority Special Water Planning Committee Meeting October 10, 2012

Frequently Asked Questions*

35. Cumulative Impacts

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT July 12, 2017 (Agenda)

Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report

Potomac Basin Case Study

TAUSSIG. & Associates, Inc. DAVID. Public Finance Facilities Planning Urban Economics CAPACITY FEE STUDY FOR SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY

Appendix A: CalSimII Modeling

Report. Office of the General Manager. Colorado River Management Report. Summary. Detailed Report

Santa Clarita Valley Hydrogeology. Production Cost = $100 / acre foot

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project Initial Study and Notice of Preparation

THE CALIFORNIA WATER FIX SUPPLY CONVEYANCE OPERATION

Transcription:

17 Santa Clara Valley Water District California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project Project No. 60061007-6810 Engineer s Report February 2015 Water Utility Capital Division

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank.

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION On September 23, 2014, the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) adopted the Engineer s Report for the SCVWD California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project. The Engineer s Report described the installation of temporary reverse flow pumping systems at up to four check structures; one each at Check Structure 22, Check Structure 20, Check Structure 18, and Check Structure 15 along the California Aqueduct, in Kings and Fresno Counties, to facilitate reverse flow of 18,000 acre-feet (AF) of SCVWD s previously banked water from Semitropic Water Storage District (Semitropic). Since adoption of the Engineer s Report, the project has undergone additional modifications which include a proposed increase in water delivery from 18,000 AF to 50,000 AF and the installation of additional infrastructure, including two 48 inch bypass pipelines, a small vacuum pump and a siphon at the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant in Merced County. The proposed modified SCVWD California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project (Project) is located at check structures 15, 18, 20, 22, and the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant along the California Aqueduct in the central San Joaquin Valley (see Figure 1 for project location). The proposed Project sites (each of the check structures and the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant) are located on properties owned by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and/or United States Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). The purpose of the proposed Project is to convey water previously banked by the SCVWD to address impacts of the severe drought. The conveyance will occur by utilizing temporary pumps to be installed at the four check structures to essentially reverse the flow of the California Aqueduct (Aqueduct) from north of check structure 25 to O Neill Forebay. SCVWD has previously banked Central Valley Project (CVP) water and State Water Project (SWP) water with Semitropic. This is accomplished via a banking agreement that provides for at least 31,500 AF of banked water to be pumped into the Aqueduct in any year (later referred to as pump-in capacity). In addition, SCVWD may gain access to another 18,500 AF from Semitropic in 2015 or 2016 that would similarly be conveyed, resulting in total flow capacity of 50,000 AF over a four-month period. Under normal operations, previously banked water is pumped into the Aqueduct for SWP use south of Semitropic, and in exchange, SCVWD is delivered an equal amount of SWP water supply through the South Bay Aqueduct or San Felipe Division (hereinafter referred to as normal operations). However, in critically dry years such as 2014 and 2015, limited supplies in the SWP may result in insufficient capacity within the SWP for exchanges under normal operations, in which case SCVWD would not receive sufficient supplies from Semitropic to meet its needs. SCVWD proposes to install a temporary reverse flow pumping system within DWR and/or Reclamation right-of-way to enable delivery of a portion of SCVWD s banking withdrawals. Temporary pumps would be installed at up to four existing check structures (Check Structures 22, 20, 18, and 15) along the Aqueduct 1 and a vacuum pump, siphon and two bypass pipelines would be installed at Dos Amigos Pumping Plant (Merced County). Of the 50,000 AF that would be pumped into the Aqueduct from Semitropic on behalf of SCVWD pursuant to the SCVWD/Semitropic banking agreement, all of it could be conveyed northerly for the purposes of the proposed Project and: (1) made available to Reclamation as CVP supply and/or DWR as SWP supply, and in return, SCVWD would receive a similar amount of exchange water, as described below; and/or (2) made available to Reclamation as CVP 1 Check structure 22 is on State of California right-of-way; check structures 20, 18, and 15 are on federal right-of-way managed by Reclamation. 1

supply and/or DWR as SWP supply for direct delivery to O Neill Forebay. All water that is conveyed northerly, and not required to be bypassed at the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant, would be distributed through existing conveyance facilities pursuant to normal operational delivery procedures. CVP exchange CVP water would be pumped through metered discharge piping around the sides of the existing control gates at up to four check structures (22, 20, 18, and/or 15), and/or siphoned from Pool 14 to 13 to bypass the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant to meet scheduled CVP demands out of San Luis Reservoir 2. Reclamation would deliver an equal amount less potential conveyance losses, if any, of CVP supply to SCVWD in San Luis Reservoir or O Neill Forebay, depending upon conditions at the time of exchange (see Figure 2); SWP exchange SWP water would be pumped through metered discharge piping around the sides of the existing control gate at one check structure (22) and delivered to SWP contractors between check structures 25 and 20 to meet scheduled demands. DWR would deliver an equal amount less potential conveyance losses, if any, of SWP supply to SCVWD via the South Bay Aqueduct and/or in San Luis Reservoir or O Neill Forebay, depending upon conditions at the time of exchange (see Figure 2). Direct delivery CVP water and/or SWP water would be pumped through metered discharge piping around the sides of the existing control gates at four check structures (22, 20, 18, and 15), and siphoned from Pool 14 to Pool 13 to bypass the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant, allowing for direct delivery to O Neill Forebay (see Figure 2). In general, the Project would include rental of pumps, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or steel pipes, diesel-driven power units, pump watch and security, and operation and maintenance. Potential types of pumps to be used include axial flow, submersible pumps or skid-mounted, horizontal pumps of various sizes, with the capability to pump at the various flow rates required to meet SCVWD demands at the time. 2. ZONE BENEFITS The proposed Project work would benefit customers of both Zones W-2 (North County) and W-5 (South County). 3. PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY As work on the proposed Project would occur within DWR and Reclamation right-of-way, SCVWD is entering into agreements with both DWR and Reclamation to allow for the installation, operation, maintenance, and de-mobilization of the temporary pump stations and siphon to occur. 2 The District may not need to install and operate the temporary pumps at all four check structures to complete this exchange.

4. MAPS AND FIGURES See attached Figures 1 through 4 at the end of this Engineer s Report. Figure 1 shows the location of each of the facilities. Figure 2 shows an overview of facilities and locations associated with the exchange of CVP and SWP water, including SCVWD, San Luis Reservoir, O Neill Forebay, the San Felipe Division, and the South Bay Aqueduct. Figure 3 shows a typical check structure and a conceptual layout of the project features, including intake pipes, nurse tanks, pumps, discharge pipes, fuel tanks, and a portable containment berm. Figure 4 shows a conceptual layout of the siphon at the Dos Amigos Pumping Plant. 5. PROJECT COSTS The estimated costs to plan, design, install, and operate the proposed Project are as follows: External Services Planning and design phase costs $435,100 Installation and operational costs $6,000,000 Subtotal $6,435,100 Internal District labor costs $300,000 Total Project cost (in 2015 dollars) $6,735,100 The proposed Project costs would be funded by the Water Utility Enterprise, with 88.2 percent of the costs allocated to Zone W-2 (North County) and 11.8 percent of the costs allocated to Zone W-5 (South County). The cost allocation is based on each zone s average Municipal and Industrial (M&I) water use versus total M&I water use. 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE Environmental review o CEQA Final IS/MND adopted: October 2014 Addendum to IS/MND completed: February 2015 o NEPA Supplemental environmental assessment completed by Reclamation staff: April 2015 Reserve equipment: April 2015 Mobilize/install project and operate or stand-by: September 2015 through March 2016 De-mobilize: April 2016 (note: with appropriate amendments, the project may be continued in 2016 if the drought continues)

7. LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location and Vicinity Map Figure 2 Other Associated Facilities Figure 3 Check Structures Conceptual Site Plan Figure 4 Siphon Conceptual Site Plan (Remainder of page intentionally left blank)

Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity Map

Figure 2. Other Associated Facilities

Figure 3. Check Structures Conceptual Site Plan

Figure 4. Siphon Conceptual Site Plan