Task 1 For Task 1, the outlet was set as a zero-gauge pressure outlet, which is the same outlet condition as the five smaller pipes.

Similar documents
Numerical analysis of eccentric orifice plate using ANSYS Fluent software

By Kimbal A. Hall, PE. Submitted to: WESTFALL MANUFACTURING COMPANY. May ALDEN RESEARCH LABORATORY, INC. 30 Shrewsbury Street Holden, MA 01520

CFD and Wind Tunnel Study of the Performance of a Multi- Directional Wind Tower with Heat Transfer Devices

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HEAT EXCHANGER EFFECTIVENESS FOR DOUBLE HELICAL AND STRAIGHT CIRCULAR GEOMETRY

International Symposium on Current Research in HydraulicTurbines DESIGN AND CFD ANALYSIS OF PICO HYDRO TURGO TURBINE

CFD SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF FLUID FLOW IN LIQUID DISTRIBUTORS

MODELING A SHROUD FOR THE WIND TURBINE AND CARRYING A FLUID FLOW ANALYSIS USING CFD SOFTWARE PACKAGE

CFD Analysis of Clarifier Performance With and Without Energy Dissipating Inlet

Selecting nozzle arrangement of a chimney tower to reduce temperature and to increase entrainment mass flow

AC : DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A CAR-TRUCK STAND

Coal to biomass (wood pellet) mill conversion

Microfluidic Systems for Cell Growth and Cell Migration Studies

Workshop 8.1 Free Vibration Analysis

Influence of material selection on finite element analysis and weight of gear box casing. Prathamesh Dodkar1

Numerical analysis of hydrogen and methane propagation during testing of combustion engines

TOSHIBA-WESTINGHOUSE FELLOWS PROGRAM FINAL REPORT AN INVESTIGATION OF GEOMETRIC EFFECTS OF A VERTICAL-DOWNWARD ELBOW ON TWO-PHASE FLOW

CFD modeling of airflows and contaminant transport in an aircraft cabin

NUMERICAL MODELING AND INVESTIGATION OF HYDROKINETIC TURBINE WITH ADDITIONAL STEERING BLADE USING CFD

Aerosol transport and deposition modelling. Tim Foat Fluid Dynamics and Indoor Dispersion Team Detection Department

CFD Analysis for Production of Carbon Nanotubes

Indoor Airflow Modeling and Data Assimilation. Hengye Yang Ph.D. Student, LISC Dec. 21, 2018

AN EXPERIENCE IN THERMODYNAMIC TEST OF LOW HEAD TURBINE IN THAILAND THE CASE OF MAE NGAT HYDRO POWER PLANT

heat exchanger modelling for generator ventilation systems

Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Effect of Gravity on the Impact of a Drop onto Dry and Wet Surfaces

A computational model for the cooling phase of injection moulding. Abstract

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL DRAFT WET COOLING TOWER AT OPTIMIZED INJECTION HEIGHT

ISSN (ONLINE): , ISSN (PRINT):

Profile optimization of the charge air distribution. flow and heat transfer. I.V. Shevchuk, A. Manguele, R.M. Conde Diez

F l u i d F l o w a n d H e a t T r a n s f e r i n S t e a m G e n e r a t o r s

Verification and Validation of Preliminarily Result of CFD of Electrostatic Precipitator Mr.Dharmendra Dekate 1 Mr.K.M.Narkar 2

ACCURATE LINEAR AND NONLINEAR SEISMIC SSI ANALYSIS BASED ON ANSYS FE MODELING USING EXTENDED SASSI METHODOLOGY

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 105 (2015 )

DECREASE THE OUTLET WATER TEMPERATURE OF CROSS FLOW COOLING TOWER

Design and Analysis of Mixing Sphere in Start-up System of Supercritical Boilers

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AIR NATURAL CIRCULATION AND THERMAL RADIATION IN PASSIVE CONTAINMENT COOLING SYSTEM

Analysis of Uniformity and Energy Consumption in. Supermarket installed DurkeeSox Air Dispersion System. with PE Air Dispersion Model

MICRO-HYDRO INSTALLATION SIZING Jacques Chaurette eng. January 17, 2008

Hydrodynamic - biokinetic model integration applied to a full-scale WWTP

Analysis and Correction of a Design Failure

ICMIEE-PI Experimental and Numerical Investigation of an Air to Water Heat Exchanger

Example 8 - Hopkinson Bar

Heat transfer enhancement in fire tube boiler using hellically ribbed tubes

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development COLD FLOW ANALYSIS IN AN ANNULAR GAS TURBINE COMBUSTOR USING CFD TOOL

Using CFD in the Design Process of a Toilet Bowl

Coal Pipe Coal Flow Distribution Control for Coal Pulverizer Systems

ANALYSIS ON NON-UNIFORM FLOW IN STEAM GENERATOR DURING STEADY STATE NATURAL CIRCULATION COOLING

CFD Analysis of Pelton Runner

Derivation of Global Parametric Performance of Mixed Flow Hydraulic Turbine Using CFD. Ruchi Khare, Vishnu Prasad and Sushil Kumar

M. C. Yaksh, Ph.D., PE NAC International T. Chung SAIC

Urban Design to Reduce building energy use: Using CFD to inform better placement of buildings.

The Ductility Exhaustion Method For Static Strength Assessment of Fusion Structures

Abstract Introduction and Background Formulation Results and Discussion Conclusion and Future Work References...

MODERN PRACTICES FOR MEASUREMENT OF GAS PATH PRESSURES AND TEMPERATURES FOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF AN AXIAL TURBINE

Florida Method of Test for NONREPETITIVE STATIC PLATE LOAD TEST OF SOILS AND FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT COMPONENTS

Modeling Component Assembly of a Bearing Using Abaqus

O. Capron *1, A. Samba 1,2, N. Omar 1, H. Gualous 2, P. Van den Bossche 1, J. Van Mierlo 1. Brussel, Brussels, BELGIUM. 1.

Heat Transfer Augmentation of Air Cooled Internal Combustion Engine Using Fins through Numerical Techniques

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulations of Dispersed Flow of Viscous Oil in Water in a Horizontal Pipe

Optimization of Wind Loads Affecting Skyscrapers using ANSYS

CFD ANALYSIS OF CONVECTIVE FLOW IN A SOLAR DOMESTIC HOT WATER STORAGE TANK

Preliminary Study for Design Core of Nuclear Research Reactor of TRIGA Bandung Using Fuel Element Plate MTR

COMSOL Multiphysics Simulation of Flow in a Radial Flow Fixed Bed Reactor (RFBR)

Design of a Small Scale CFB Boiler Combustion Chamber for Laboratory Purposes

INVESTIGATION OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF HELLER-TYPE COOLING TOWERS WITH DIFFERENT COOLING DELTA ANGLES

CFD Modelling of an Aerosol Exposure Chamber for Medical Studies G. Manenti, M. Derudi, G. Nano, R. Rota

Comparative Analysis of Different Orifice Geometries for Pressure Drop

15 Lined Tunnel Construction in Saturated Ground

SAWS WATER PROJECTS MODELING CRITERIA GUIDELINES

Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis in De-staging of Centrifugal Pumps

Heat Transfer in Laser Tumor Excision

Numerical Investigation of the Integration of Heat Transfer Devices into Wind Towers

Project Background (long term goals)

CFD Analysis of a Mixture Flow in a Producer Gas Carburetor for optimizing the design configuration

Study of Liquid Dispersal from a Missile Impacting a Wall

Energy-recovery System for Continuous Conveyors

Development of a Diaphragm Stirling Cryocooler

INVESTIGATION ON DRAG COEFFICIENT OF SUPERCIRTICAL WATER CROSS-FLOW PAST CYLINDER BIOMASS PARTICEL AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS

PERFORMANCE BASED EVALUATION OF FIRE SCENARIOS USING FLUENT

Burst Pressure Prediction of Cylindrical Shell Intersection

Thermosyphon in End View

CRHT VII. Design and CFD analysis of Pico- hydro Turgo turbine. Paper no. CRHT17-11

Numerical Investigation of Process Intensification of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in a Gas-Solid Vortex Reactor: Gas flow study

CFD ANALYSIS OF SOLAR HEATER WATER PIPE WITH DIFFERENT INCLINATION

Fundamental Course in Mechanical Processing of Materials. Exercises

Code No: R Set No. 1

Numerical Modelling of Air Distribution in the Natatorium Supported by the Experiment

CFD Modeling of Crankcase Inertial Oil Separators. Arun P. Janakiraman Anna Balazy Saru Dawar

Comparison of Borehole Heat Exchangers (BHEs): State of the Art vs. Novel Design Approaches

Investigating two configurations of a heat exchanger in an Indirect Heating Integrated Collector Storage Solar Water Heating System (IHICSSWHS)

Modelling of Material Removal in Abrasive Flow Machining Process Using CFD Simulation

Advanced Electric Submersible Pump Design Tool for Geothermal Applications

ANSYS CALCULATIONS REPORT Outer Vessel Ansys outer vessel Sylvain ANTOINE Amaury PORHIEL - Rev C

USE OF INELASTIC ANALYSIS IN CASK DESIGN

ANALYSIS FOR NATURAL CIRCULATION LOOP

Application of CFD for Analyzing Quenching and Quench System Design. Andrew L. Banka

DESIGN AND WEIGHT OPTIMIZATION OF GRAVITY ROLLER CONVEYOR

SCHULTE & ASSOCIATES Building Code Consultants 3500 Creighton Road, K5 Pensacola, FL

CCC Annual Report Quantitative Measurement of Molten Steel Surface Velocity with Nail Boards and SVC Sensor in CC Molds

Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics in High Porosity Metal Foams

Transcription:

Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 1 of 9 Setup The geometry was created in ANSYS Design modeler as specified in the report instructions. A plane of symmetry was used to reduce the computation time and to analyze the velocities at the midplane. Fine meshing was used with 1-layer inflation at the wall boundaries. A slow growth face sizing mesh control was imposed on the outlet to increase the accuracy of Task 2. Normal gravity was set in the downwards direction. Figure 1. Meshing of the pipe. Task 1 For Task 1, the outlet was set as a zero-gauge pressure outlet, which is the same outlet condition as the five smaller pipes. Case 1 Figure 2. Velocity contour for case 1. Figure 3. Mass flow rates for case 1.

Velocity in the Direction of Axis (m/s) Static Gauge Pressure in the Direction of Axis (Pa) Mass Flow Rate (kg/s) Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 2 of 9 Case 1: Mass Flow Rates.1.8.6.4.2 Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Outlet 3 Outlet 4 Outlet 5 Figure 4. Mass flow rates for case 1. Case 1: Static Gauge Pressure Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis 15 1 5.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Figure 5. Static gauge pressure along the axis in the direction of the axis for case 1. Case 1: Velocity Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis.7.6.5.4.3.2.1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Figure 6. Velocity along the axis in the direction of the axis for case 1.

Static Gauge Pressure in the Direction of Axis (Pa) Mass Flow Rate (kg/s) Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 3 of 9 Case 2 Figure 7. Contour plot of velocity for case 2. Figure 8. Mass flow rates for the 5 outlet pipes in case 2. Case 2: Mass Flow Rate.14.12.1.8.6.4.2 Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Outlet 3 Outlet 4 Outlet 5 Figure 9. Mass flow rates for the 5 outlet pipes in case 2. Case 2: Static Gauge Pressure Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis 15 1 5.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Figure 1. Static gauge pressure along the axis in the direction of the axis for case 2.

Velocity in the Direction of Axis (m/s) Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 4 of 9 Case 2: Velocity Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis.8.6.4.2 -.2.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Figure 11. Velocity along the axis in the direction of the axis for case 2. Task 2 i) Best case for uniform mass flow rates. The best case with the smallest S index was with the outlet B completely closed and outlet diameters 1 through 5 set to 5 cm, 4.13 cm, 3.59 cm, 3.14 cm, and 2.92 cm, respectively. This obtained an S index of.57. This value is already quite small, but could have been further reduced by continuing the iterative process I will describe in part (ii). S Index for Best Case.57 Figure 12. Velocity contour for the best-case scenario. Figure 13. Mass flow rates for the best-case scenario.

Velocity in the Direction of Axis (m/s) Static Gauge Pressure in the Direction of Axis (Pa) Mass flow rate (kg/s) Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 5 of 9 Mass flow rates for "best case".12.1.96546993.95967621.959811.96962.9738988.8.6.4.2 Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Outlet 3 Outlet 4 Outlet 5 Figure 14. Mass flow rates for the best-case scenario. Static Gauge Pressure Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis for "Best Case" 1 8 6 4 2.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Figure 15. Plot of Static Gauge Pressure Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis for "Best Case." Velocity Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis for "Best Case".8.6.4.2 -.2.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Figure 16. Velocity Along the Axis in the Direction of the Axis for "Best Case".

Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 6 of 9 i) Process for finding the best case for uniform mass flow rates. To find the conditions for the lowest S index in the most efficient way, I first thought I should optimize the B outlet opening, and then with that opening, optimize the pipe diameters. If necessary I could return to optimizing the B outlet opening with these new pipe diameters and continue in that fashion. In order to change the area of opening for outlet B, I split the outlet face into two parts as shown in Figure 17. The inner face was set as an outlet with zero-gauge pressure, while the outer face was set as a wall. The mesh size was increased near this outlet to increase the accuracy of the results. All the exact results are given in the appendix. Figure 17. Meshing of the B outlet showing the refined mesh and the split face. I started with 5% flow area and compared the results with case 1 and case 2. Case 1 with 1% flow area had an S index of.24, case 2 with % flow are had an S index of.187755, and the case with 5% flow area had the lowest index of.85. One of the velocity contours for the partial opening at outlet B is shown in Figure 18. Figure 18. Velocity contour for partial opening at outlet B.

Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 7 of 9 I then tried 25% flow area by adjusting the diameter of the split face, but surprisingly, this had an S index that was higher than both the % and the 5%. This indicates that the S-index has a multipeak relationship with the outlet flow area. I next tried 4% and 45% flow area, but both were still higher than 5%, so I switched sides and tried 6% flow area and the S index dropped to.25. I was looking for the spread of outlet flow values. The mass flow was increasing across each outlet for % flow area, but decreasing across each outlet for 1% area, so I hoped to find a condition in the middle where the flows were higher at the beginning and end, but dropped in the middle. Then I would be able to adjust the diameter of the outlets, to further refine the mass flow at the outlets. However, I realized that the lowest S index could be achieved more easily when the mass flow was higher, because the relative error would be lower. So, I changed my strategy to what I should have done from the beginning. I set the outlet to be completely closed, which not only increases the mass flow rate through the other outlets, but also sets the mass flow rate to a constant value, eliminating a variable. With the outlet B closed, the mass flow rates tend to increase successively, so I set the first outlet 1 to the max diameter of 5 cm. I knew I could eliminate another variable by setting this diameter to a constant, and the best solution would have the 1 st diameter as the largest. From this point on I would only adjust the other four diameters based on the results. I looked at the results of each iteration and adjusted based on the mass flow results. I would generally increase the diameter of the lower mass flow rate pipes, and decrease the diameter of the pipes with mass flow ratees greater than the average, keeping in mind that increasing flow in one pipe would decrease the flow in the pipes around it. Because I closed the B outlet, I knew what the mass flow rate through each pipe should be because it is constant, so I could also gauge my adjustments based on how off they were from that value. My adjustments became more refined as the number of iterations increased. I stopped once the S-index fell below.1, but I could have further refined the diameter sizes indefinitely to reach lower values. These trials were very easy to iterate because all I needed to do was change the diameters, and update the project. I set gravity in the downwards direction, which slightly affected the results of my project. I compared my results with Jack Miller s.

Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 8 of 9 Appendix: S Indices and Plots of Mass Flow Rates Across Outlets 1-5 for Task 2 CASE 2 % Area Outlet 1.7561.96568.463 Outlet 2.81849.96568.217 Outlet 3.92159.96568 1.94E-5 Outlet 4.19154.96568.158 Outlet 5.124615.96568.787.482838 S index:.187755.15.1.5 2 4 6 6% Area Flow DO=.387, 3D =.5 Outlet 1.51184.64497.177 Outlet 2.5567.64497.194 Outlet 3.63164.64497 1.78E-6 Outlet 4.6955.64497 2.51E-5 Outlet 5.8866.64497.555 S index:.214124.1.5 2 4 6 25% Area Flow D=.25 Outlet 1.63722.78431.216 Outlet 2.64486.78431.194 Outlet 3.73647.78431 2.29E-5 Outlet 4.87497.78431 8.22E-5 Outlet 5.1283.78431.594.392155 S index:.189961 4% Area Flow D=.3162 Outlet 1.6353.733 4.59E-5 Outlet 2.62778.733 5.66E-5 Outlet 3.67498.733 7.87E-6 Outlet 4.74768.733 1.99E-5 Outlet 5.82941.733.16.351516 S index:.18334 45% Area Flow D=.335 Outlet 1.6281.6782 1.82E-5 Outlet 2.699.6782 3.81E-5 Outlet 3.64537.6782 6.47E-6 Outlet 4.7166.6782 9.52E-6 Outlet 5.76986.6782 9.81E-5.33548 S index:.8735 5% Area Flow D=.35355 Outlet 1.6313.62695 5.67E-6 Outlet 2.5681.62695 3.46E-5 Outlet 3.59292.62695 1.16E-5 Outlet 4.6519.62695 5.83E-6 Outlet 5.7195.62695 8.57E-5.313473 S index:.85412 6% Area Flow D=.387 Outlet 1.5999.58666 1.75E-6 Outlet 2.5639.58666 5.18E-6 Outlet 3.57718.58666 8.99E-7 Outlet 4.58946.58666 7.82E-8 Outlet 5.6288.58666 2.63E-6 S index:.24745 CASE 1 1% Area r=.25 Outlet 1.54151.4198.15 Outlet 2.49453.4198 5.69E-5 Outlet 3.43829.4198 3.69E-6 Outlet 4.36764.4198 2.65E-5 Outlet 5.25345.4198.274.29541 S index:.241296.15.1.5 2 4 6.1.5 2 4 6.1.5 2 4 6.1.5 2 4 6.1.5 2 4 6.1.5 2 4 6 95% Area Flow DO=.387, 3D =.5 Outlet 1.5324242.5291 1.1E-7 Outlet 2.5798882.5291 4.46E-6 Outlet 3.5425144.5291 1.8E-6 Outlet 4.55298992.5291 5.71E-6 Outlet 5.595851.5291 3.81E-6 S index:.33685 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.45, D3=.4, D2=.35, D5=.3 Outlet 1.82511157.96568.198 Outlet 2.93945965.96568 6.87E-6 Outlet 3.129659.96568 3.6E-5 Outlet 4.1717162.96568.112 Outlet 5.97114176.96568 2.98E-7 S index:.86363 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.4, D3=.3, D2=.25, D5=.2 Outlet 1.1114.96557.22 Outlet 2.122778.96557.688 Outlet 3.147.96557 6.63E-5 Outlet 4.8559.96557.12 Outlet 5.58316.96557.1462 S index:.234197 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.35, D3=.35, D2=.3, D5=.25 Outlet 1.11691344.96557.414 Outlet 2.8948.96557 5.1E-5 Outlet 3.1587414.96557 8.68E-5 Outlet 4.9763547.96557 1.16E-6 Outlet 5.72883487.96557.56 S index:.15459 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.38, D3=.37, D2=.36, D5=.35 Outlet 1.1153287.96566 2.47E-5 Outlet 2.8223411.96566.26 Outlet 3.858146.96566.116 Outlet 4.9892941.96566 5.46E-6 Outlet 5.11435517.96566.316 S index:.119675 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.4, D3=.38, D2=.36, D5=.33 Outlet 1.926.96565 1.57E-5 Outlet 2.8525.96565.258 Outlet 3.86871944.96565 9.4E-5 Outlet 4.165.96565 1.67E-5 Outlet 5.1222.96565.657 S index:.149462 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.4, D2=.36, D5=.33 Outlet 1.85329.9656.126 Outlet 2.82697.9656.192 Outlet 3.9686.9656 2.25E-7 Outlet 4.1589.9656 8.7E-5 Outlet 5.1128.9656.264 S index:.119822.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6

Jacob Schichtel Project 2 Page 9 of 9 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.4, D2=.35, D5=.31 Outlet 1.84463567.96565.146 Outlet 2.83921.96565.16 Outlet 3.1146.96565 2.4E-5 Outlet 4.189295.96565.153 Outlet 5.145129.96565 5.6E-5 S index:.1754.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.35, D2=.31, D5=.29 Outlet 1.95.96559 2.43E-6 Outlet 2.13.96559 1.4E-5 Outlet 3.95338.96559 1.49E-6 Outlet 4.9496.96559 2.56E-6 Outlet 5.97198.96559 4.8E-7 S index:.21164.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.39, D2=.33, D5=.3 Outlet 1.858614.96562.115 Outlet 2.8868.96562 6.21E-5 Outlet 3.1287.96562 3.98E-5 Outlet 4.124.96562 3.41E-5 Outlet 5.13.96562 4.14E-5 S index:.79134.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.4, D3=.35, D2=.31, D5=.29 Outlet 1.19583.96568 1.93E-5 Outlet 2.9356939.96568 8.99E-6 Outlet 3.9581734.96568 5.73E-7 Outlet 4.9516.96568 1.98E-6 Outlet 5.9734271.96568 5.97E-7 S index:.25958.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.38, D2=.32, D5=.29 Outlet 1.878378.96565 7.62E-5 Outlet 2.9279669.96565 2.1E-5 Outlet 3.13165.96565 4.36E-5 Outlet 4.113.96565 2.24E-5 Outlet 5.984436.96565 3.53E-6 S index:.59631.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.41, D3=.35, D2=.31, D5=.29 Outlet 1.99268.96567 7.3E-6 Outlet 2.96423.96567 2.7E-8 Outlet 3.95227.96567 1.8E-6 Outlet 4.95277.96567 1.66E-6 Outlet 5.9664.96567 5.33E-9 S index:.1526.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.37, D2=.31, D5=.28 Outlet 1.9554.96562 3.61E-5 Outlet 2.9364.96562 8.54E-6 Outlet 3.1385.96562 5.31E-5 Outlet 4.9965.96562 6.27E-6 Outlet 5.957.96562 7.43E-7 S index:.4743 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.35, D2=.3, D5=.28 Outlet 1.975.96534 9.33E-7 Outlet 2.123.96534 3.32E-5 Outlet 3.985.96534 3.87E-6 Outlet 4.9257.96534 1.57E-5 Outlet 5.918.96534 2.24E-5 S index:.4432 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.42, D3=.35, D2=.3, D5=.28 Outlet 1.975.96534 9.33E-7 Outlet 2.123.96534 3.32E-5 Outlet 3.985.96534 3.87E-6 Outlet 4.9257.96534 1.57E-5 Outlet 5.918.96534 2.24E-5 S index:.4432.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6.15.1.5 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.412, D3=.352, D2=.312, D5=.292 Outlet 1.9794.96564 1.89E-6.15 Outlet 2.9669.96564 1.58E-8.1 Outlet 3.949.96564 2.77E-6 Outlet 4.95558.96564 1.1E-6.5 Outlet 5.977338.96564 1.37E-6 S index:.1234 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.413, D3=.354, D2=.313, D5=.292 Outlet 1.974469.96539 8.25E-7.15 Outlet 2.97994.96539 2.12E-6.1 Outlet 3.94561.96539 3.91E-6 Outlet 4.9597226.96539 3.99E-7.5 Outlet 5.96784756.96539 6.5E-8 S index:.12528 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.413, D3=.36, D2=.313, D5=.292 Outlet 1.96576959.96568 8.75E-11.15 Outlet 2.96113488.96568 2.6E-7.1 Outlet 3.98611.96568 2.23E-6 Outlet 4.94979987.96568 2.52E-6.5 Outlet 5.9716569.96568 2.9E-7 S index:.169 2 4 6 Outlet Area 1%, D1=.5, D2=.413, D3=.359, D2=.314, D5=.292 Outlet 1.96546993.96568 4.3E-1.15 Outlet 2.95967621.96568 3.6E-7.1 Outlet 3.959811.96568 3.44E-7 Outlet 4.96962.96568 1.55E-7.5 Outlet 5.9738988.96568 6.61E-7 S index:.5712 2 4 6