The Neutral or Beneficial Effect on Water Quality Assessment Tool

Similar documents
THE NEUTRAL OR BENEFICIAL EFFECT ON WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL.

Neutral or Beneficial Effect on Water Quality Assessment Tool CONSULTANTS AND CONSULTANT ADMINISTRATORS. User Guide

Water Catchment Protection: Councils Interactions with Water NSW and Challenges and Impacts of Water Catchment Protection Requirements

To understand how runoff water can be polluted if land uses are not properly managed

Skill Set CPCSS00004 Provide Building Surveying Services for Residential Buildings up to Three Storeys

GUIDE TO THE COMPLYING DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST

Complying Development Checklist for Alterations (not Additions) to Dwellings & Ancillary Development. under the NSW Housing Alterations Code

SUBMISSION GUIDE ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. May

Memorandum of Understanding

Catchment Management Plan. An overview of Hunter Water s plan for our catchments. Catchment Management Plan An Overview 1

Connecting to Sydney Water systems. This policy applies to all customers who want to connect to or disconnect from Sydney Water s systems.

10.1 OBJECTIVES. Note: Refer to Section 6 for Issues, Methods of Implementation, and Environmental Results Anticipated.

Environment Plan Sydney Water s objectives, targets and actions to protect the environment and enhance the liveability of our communities.

Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Reforms

Water NSW Reporting Manual

Sarah West, Environment Protection Authority Victoria, Melbourne, Australia

Chapter 8 Objective: Invest in Our Future. 69 Irish Water Water Services Strategic Plan

E1. Water quality and integrated management

MEETING THE CHALLENGES IN APPLYING THE AUSTRALIAN GUIDELINES FOR WATER RECYCLING FOR REGIONAL NSW

Water Quality and Public Health. Water Suppliers

SCA Environmental Management Report September Report to IPART

POLLUTION INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT PLAN (PIRMP)

URBAN WATER CYCLE PLANNING GUIDE

Integrated Water Management Developer Guidance

ON-SITE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT POLICY

draft Environment Strategy

Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement Framework

Division: Planning & Regulation Job Grade: JG7

12. Environmental management

Sydney Opera House Policy

EVALUATING THE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF NEW WASTEWATER SCHEMES ON SYDNEY S OUTSKIRTS

Final report. Date published: May PUBLISHED BY Meat and Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059

STANDARD SITE CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW PREVENTION DECEMBER 2016 VERSION: 1.0

SUBMISSION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENT ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY

Complying Development Checklist for. Swimming Pools. under the NSW General Housing Code

BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE G1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Environmental Management System

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

ULDA Decision Notice

Challenges of applying the Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling for regional NSW

Greens NSW. Planning, Building and Infrastructure Policy. Principles. Policy Detail. (Under review)

UrbanSAT- Urban System Analysis Tool : For delivering urban water balancing and reporting

Melbourne Sewerage Strategy Discussion Paper, April 2018

PROTECTING OUR DRINKING WATER CATCHMENTS

Introduction. Who should read this brochure? Areas that we specialise in are as follows:

Water Treatment Technician

PROTECTING OUR DRINKING WATER CATCHMENTS

LIVING VICTORIA: WATER POLICY INITIATIVE

Strategic Asset Capacity

Executive Summary. Pollution Prevention in India: HyWaMIS (Hyderabad Water Management Information System)

Dendrobium Mine. Waste Management Plan

Catchment Water Quality Protection

Policy Document. Contaminated Land Management Policy. Address. Online. Phone & Fax: Chelmsford Place Leeton NSW 2705

ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN. Environment Protection Authority, ACT May 2009

DRAFT NSW COASTAL PLANNING GUIDELINE: ADAPTING TO SEA LEVEL RISE SUBMISSION BY THE PLANNING INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA (PIA) DECEMBER 2009

AS/NZS 1547:2012 and AS/NZS 1547:2000 On-site Domestic Wastewater Management CONTENTS COMPARISON [PART A: AS/NZS 1547:2012 LISTED ORDER]

AS/NZS 1547:2012 and AS/NZS 1547:2000 On-site Domestic Wastewater Management CONTENTS COMPARISON [PART B: AS/NZS 1547:2000 LISTED ORDER]

SEPP (Waters) Review. Veronica Lanigan & Sally Lock

Chapter 6 Objective: Protect and Enhance the Environment

DRAFT SUBMISSION REGARDING

Overview and key environmental issues

A 25 Year Strategic Plan

CAPABILITY STATEMENT SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY SERVICES CLEAN ENERGY. CORPORATION AUSTRALIA

CORPORATE STANDARD ROUTINE MINOR WORKS DEVELOPERS AND ACCREDITED SUPPLIERS

MANAGING TRADE WASTE WHAT SHOULD BEST PRACTICE LOOK LIKE? Rosemary Bissett. City West Water

Water Supply / Drainage / Vehicle Crossing Service Connection Information Sheet

Ensuring safe drinking water in regional NSW: the role of regulation

BIODIVERSITY AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE FOR HAMPSHIRE

Building Designers Australia Overview of Low Rise Medium Density Housing as Complying Development

Environmental Bill of Rights Draft Version DRAFT - For Consultation Purposes Only Ministry of the Environment

AS/NZS ISO FUTURE Of Australia s Welding Industry. How To Use It. Weld Australia. Helping Secure The

Some Sydney councils require 27 reports for a single house development application

Certification Application Form

Draft NSW Coastal Planning Guideline: Adapting to Sea Level Rise

Horticultural Development within the Peel-Harvey Coastal Plain Catchment

About PIA INTRODUCTION:

Preliminary Submission to the Department of Planning on the Reform Agenda.

Managing Legislative Risk

Monitoring recordkeeping performance

SKILLED MIGRATION ASSESSMENT APPLICATION FORM 2016

Biodiversity certification and banking in coastal and growth areas

GOVERNANCE TOOLKIT. Business Continuity Management. Version 1: 1 March 2016 THIS TOOLKIT PROUDLY SUPPORTED BY

APPENDIX A. Nutrient Trading Criteria Specific for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 2017

SUBMISSION ON NSW COASTAL MANAGEMENT REFORM PACKAGE

MEETING THE WATER INDUSTRY S FUTURE TRAINING NEEDS..CAN OUR TRAINING SYSTEM COPE? Jennifer James. NSW Public Sector Industry Training Advisory Body

17 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

How to set up a sewer mining scheme

CORPORATE STANDARD ROUTINE MAJOR WORKS DEVELOPERS AND ACCREDITED SUPPLIERS VERSION: 1.0

LEPs and SEPPs. Planning, Development & Heritage. Local environmental plans (LEPs) Last updated: January 2013

Stormwater Management in the Metro Vancouver Region

Guidance for merged councils on planning functions

BEVERAGE CANS REVESBY

DISCRETIONARY GRANT MONITORING AND EVALUATION POLICY AND GUIDELINES

1. The impacts of development and settlement intensification on biodiversity and Aboriginal cultural heritage;

Application for Project Information Memorandum and/or Building Consent (Form 2) Section 33 or section 45, Building Act 2004

Sponsorship prospectus

Standard Provisions for Multiple Dwelling Developments. Stage 1 Project Plan

PUTNAM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXHIBIT DD INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT

Barry M. Evans*, David W. Lehning, Tatiana Borisova, Kenneth J. Corradini, and Scott A. Sheeder.

Transcription:

The Neutral or Beneficial Effect on Water Quality Assessment Tool Author(s): Alison Kniha, Greg Greene Organisation: WaterNSW Country: Australia Email: alison.kniha@waternsw.com.au Paper: INTRODUCTION On 1 January 2015, the Sydney Catchment Authority (SCA) and State Water formed WaterNSW, a single organisation responsible for managing bulk water supply across the State. WaterNSW s area of operations includes the Sydney drinking water catchment ( Figure 1), which supplies drinking water to more than four and a half million people, and is overlapped by fifteen local government areas. The neutral or beneficial effect test on water quality (NorBE) is a key component of the assessment and determination process established by State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Drinking Water Catchment) 2011 (the SEPP). The SEPP also provides a concurrence role for WaterNSW. NorBE is satisfied if a development has no identifiable potential water quality impacts, or the impacts can be contained within the development site and contaminants prevented from reaching the drainage system, or any impacts can be transferred outside the site for treatment and disposal to the required standard. Figure 1. The Sydney Drinking Water Catchment

A NorBE assessment must be completed for all development applications (DAs) submitted in the catchment, and consent cannot be granted by councils, as consent authorities, unless NorBE is satisfied. WaterNSW recognised that councils did not have the resources, technical expertise or access to tools and models to undertake NorBE assessments. To ensure compliance with the SEPP and help deliver better water quality outcomes, WaterNSW has developed a highly innovative, web-based software application the NorBE Assessment Tool. The NorBE Tool, accessible to both council staff and consultants operating in the catchment, enables consistent assessment across the catchment and reduces the number of routine DAs being referred to WaterNSW for assessment. DISCUSSION The NorBE Tool is a web-based software application that was custom-built for WaterNSW, with a GIS interface that allows the assessment of development site conditions, and stormwater and wastewater impacts. The Tool incorporates WaterNSW s wastewater effluent model for use in assessing development proposals in unsewered areas. The development of the Tool was a highly innovative project, breaking new ground for WaterNSW, and arguably the state of NSW. There was no existing off the shelf products that interfaced with WaterNSW s GIS, or performed the other required functions of NorBE and wastewater modelling. Version 1 of the Tool was released in March 2011 for use by councils in the catchment. In February 2015 a substantial upgrade was released to allow broader access to, and use of, the Tool. The upgraded Tool enables councils to assess a broader range of the most common development types, as well as enabling consultants to complete their own NorBE assessments and lodge them with councils electronically in a secure environment. This increases the likelihood of high quality assessments being lodged that specifically address and achieve NorBE requirements, reducing the number of times councils and/or WaterNSW have to request further information in order to complete an assessment. Different levels of user authorisations and stakeholder self-management have been incorporated, reflecting the management hierarchies of councils and consultancies, WaterNSW maintains control over the tools and data. WaterNSW can also view all assessments, regardless of the original author, but can only modify WaterNSW s own assessments. Using the different levels of user authorisations, NorBE assessments can be submitted for approval, approved by managers and the determination result recorded (ie consent refused or granted). The NorBE Tool makes the NorBE assessment process less onerous for councils, providing a consistent approach across all councils in meeting the requirements of the SEPP. Councils can assess most common types of developments, including most alterations and additions, swimming pools, single dwellings and dual occupancies, and small urban and rural subdivisions. A Notice prepared under Clause 64 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 allows Councils who use the NorBE tool to assume concurrence for these development types, enabling council staff to undertake their own NorBE assessments. Consultants can prepare NorBE assessments for lodging with council for any type of development. Councils can then certify the assessments for those development

types for which there is assumed concurrence, or forward them to WaterNSW for concurrence. Using the NorBE Tool The Tool guides the user through a number of screens depending on the nature of the proposal, recording the decision process for each development. After entering lot information, which displays on the SIX Maps Viewer screen (Figure 2), the Pre-Assessment Checklist poses a series of generic questions to be asked at the start of each assessment. These questions help to focus the assessment on the nature of the proposal and the adequacy and completion of all water quality documentation accompanying the proposal. Figure 2. The Lots Screen Showing the GIS Interface For a council user, the Tool will indicate immediately whether the proposal is one for which they can complete the NorBE assessment (a Module 1: small sewered development or Module 2: small unsewered development), or whether it needs to be referred to WaterNSW for concurrence (Module 3: large sewered subdivisions, Module 4: large unsewered subdivisions and Module 5: all other development). For consultants, the Tool will open the appropriate Module screen (1, 2, 3 or 4) for completion of the assessment. A series of questions relevant to the development type are posed for each Module, with the most thorough assessment required for development types with the greatest potential risk to water quality. Help widgets have been added to assist the user answer questions, and a pop-up box appears when an outcome has been reached. The Tool saves the assessment each time the assessor clicks the Next button to move between the screens to the next part of the assessment. It automatically generates conditions of consent according to the information entered by the user, for example conditions relating to erosion and sediment control measures. Notes can be added at any stage of the assessment.

The unsewered Modules of the Tool (2 and 4) include the wastewater effluent model (WEM) as part of the assessment. The WEM is a GIS-based effluent plume generation modelling tool to support the design of on-site wastewater systems, and the only one of its kind developed in Australia. It has been externally peer reviewed by industry experts and has attracted the interest of other councils and other natural resource management organisations. The WEM has been designed so that it can be used even by those without extensive background knowledge or technical expertise. The WEM draws upon natural resource spatial data for model inputs and design calculations, modelling the direction and distance that three contaminants of concern (faecal coliforms, nitrogen and phosphorus) will travel beyond the edge of the effluent management area (EMA). This allows a visual interpretation and assessment of the potential impact of a development on water quality (Figure 3). Figure 3. WEM Outcome Screen Example of Effluent Plume Generation The user is required to enter information (development type, effluent volumes, proposed wastewater and disposal system types and sizes, soils data and estimated risk) into four WEM screens that appear as tabs across the top of the screen. The proposed EMA site is located by clicking on the aerial photo this generates system GIS data for that site and its possible suitability as a location for the EMA. If the effluent plume is predicted to leave the site, or reach a watercourse then the proposed on-site system does not have a neutral or beneficial effect on water quality. Also, errors and system constraints are identified by the Tool, allowing the WEM to be used as a design tool, and ensuring consistency with Australian Standard 1547:2012 ( Figure 4).

Figure 4. System constraints identified by Tool (red and orange text) The proposed EMA site, or type of on-site system, can be altered in various scenarios to assess whether alternative proposals contain the effluent on-site. In this way, consultants can use the NorBE Tool as a design tool, ensuring that their proposal will have a neutral or beneficial effect on water quality before they submit it to council as part of the DA. The first part of the NorBE assessment, including wastewater effluent modelling if relevant, is able to be completed as a desktop assessment. The last section requires a site visit. In completing the relevant tabs for the assessment, the Tool leads to a particular action or generates a NorBE outcome, for example that NorBE is satisfied, and for councils, that consent may be issued on water quality grounds. Reports for individual assessments and determined applications can also be generated directly from the Tool. The active involvement of key stakeholders was a key strength in the Tool s development, affording a high degree of scrutiny. Councils and consultants were involved in workshops during development, and participated in a comprehensive training and familiarisation program before go live of both versions of the Tool. These programs provided the opportunity for further enhancements to be identified and incorporated in the final version. Council staff were also formally surveyed on their experiences in using Version 1 of the Tool and their feedback was used to inform the upgrade. All training and support is provided at no cost to councils or consultants. The NorBE Assessment Guideline supports the implementation of the SEPP by providing clear direction on what a NorBE means and how to achieve it, and provides the decision-making framework for the NorBE Tool, ensuring transparency. WaterNSW has also developed User Guides for both councils and consultants that provide step-by-step instructions on how to use the Tool. Screen shots are included to inform every stage of the assessment process, as well as providing hints for troubleshooting. All these documents are available to download from WaterNSW s

website, and through links provided in the NorBE Tool. Assistance is also available through WaterNSW s Help Desk link in the Tool. In addition to the contracted developer, WaterNSW worked with the NSW Department of Planning and Environment in the development and review of the SEPP and the gazettal of the NorBE Guidelines. Land and Property Information provided the custodial spatial services through their SIX Maps Viewer. Contractors provided WEM development and support. CONCLUSION The NorBE Tool has been designed to be practical and simple, providing the flexibility to achieve the best outcomes for the protection of water quality. It reduces costs to the developer, the community, the consent authority and WaterNSW as well as providing consistency and transparency of process. Use of the Tool has resulted in a marked decrease in the number of DAs being forwarded to WaterNSW for concurrence assessment (Figure 5), in turn resulting in reduced assessment times and costs for proponents, consultants and councils. The development and implementation of the NorBE Tool and the WEM has helped reduce the risk of development occurring that will have a detrimental impact on water quality. Introduction of NorBE Tool (March 2011) No. DAs Processed Upgrade of NorBE Tool (February 2015) Figure 5. Reduction in DAs processed by WaterNSW (6 monthly)