Biodiversity and ungulate management in managed forests Authors: Stefan SCHNEIDER *, Hans VON DER GOLTZ *, Alexander HELD **

Similar documents
Norway Spruce Conversion Options and Consequences

Wilderness in Germany Part I: National strategy, scientific background and actual challenges

City forest of Göttingen Demo sites

City forest of Lübeck Demo sites

Valuation of damage caused by wild animals in the forest of Brandenburg

Pro Silva Jahrestagung 2018

Decision of the 67th Conference of the Ministers for European Affairs of the German Federal States 29/30 January Courtesy translation -

Innovative forest management - developing new and innovative approaches for sustainable forest development

The role of nature conservation in cross- sectoral adaptation strategies to climate change - and related activites of the BfN

Facing climate change, similarities and differences between agriculture and forestry. COST Action FP0703 ECHOES. Topol cianky, May th, COST 734

LOCAL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES IN FIGURES

EIP-AGRI Workshop Building new biomass supply chains for the bio-based economy. May 27 28, 2015 Alghero, Italy

Integrated Forest Management Learning Architecture

Marteloscopes and the I+ software tool for silviculture training initiatives in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Research Strategy of the Forest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg

LIFE10NAT/DE/007. FINAL Report Covering the project activities from to

STATUS OF WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN GERMANY

International Forest Management: A Case Study of Germany, Wales, Sweden and Finland

Towards a European Forest Risk Facility FRISK GO

5.2 Douglas fir in Freiburg City Forest: an introduced tree species in the light of multifunctional management objectives

PROJECT In-Tree. Introduced tree species in European forests: challenges and opportunities

LOCAL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES IN FIGURES

ACTUAL CHALLENGES IN FOREST MANAGAMENT

Towards a European Forest Risk Facility FRISK GO

National Consultation on value chains & policy priorities Germany

Overview and Challenges for Evaluations in Germany s Agricultural Sector Dr. Arno Becker (USV-Agrar)

Forest Management and Climate Change in Germany

Summary of the Bachelor s Thesis: Can Freiburg Feed Itself by Dominique Bednarek

Milk production has its price! Germany 0.50 euros

REPORT FROM THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Establishment of a Foundation. for the Accreditation of Study Courses in Germany

Lima Action Plan. Implementation in Germany. Position Paper. for UNESCO s Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. Sankt Ingbert, 14 September 2017

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1808*

Ministry of Natural Resources. Strategy for Wolf Conservation in Ontario

Continuous Cover Forest Management

CarBi Project Summary

Nature-based Solutions to Climate Change in Urban Areas and their Rural Surroundings

THE PRICE OF SILVER FIR (ABIES ALBA MILL.) CONSERVATION IN MIXED MOUNTAIN FORESTS

STORMWATER CLIMATE RESILIENCE

Outline for. Protected Areas Management Planning

Chapter 3. The case studies. 3.1 Study area

Webinar Natural Capital Markets for Watershed Services: Actors, Mechanisms, and Impacts 26/04/2014. Joost Bakker Programme manager Global Nature Fund

Kurtis Robins District Ranger US Forest Service 138 S Main

Forest Health in Terra Nova National Park

Range Management on Alberta s Public Land

Value creation Connecting societal challenges to land management. Margot de Cleen Co Molenaar

Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Report No.

Climate Change and Renewable Energy issues in RDP

MINISTRY OF LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME (TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE- TA) DRAFT

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENTS (MA) IN TANZANIA. September 2008

Opening up expertise to civil society: Case-study of ANSES. Régine Fraysse-Boutrais

Second Opinion on Québec s Green Bond Framework

Sustainable Forest Management for Greener Economies. Results: Georgia

2006, Queen s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada

DRAFT MEDIUM TERM WORK PLAN COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY, RISK ASSESSMENT, ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION.

Supply Chain Excellence in the German aerospace industry

2.6 let s be responsible

An Example of Long-Form Audit Reporting

Conversion of Norway spruce monocultures need for sustainable forest management in the Czech Republic

THE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CYCLE

Agricultural Reform and Public Goods

Submission to SBSTA 1 from Conservation International regarding Ecosystem-based Adaptation: Lessons, Good Practices and Tools January 2017

2-5 Forestry in a Changing Climate the Necessity of Thinking Decades Ahead

Plantation Forestry: A Global Look

WADDEN SEA WORLD HERITAGE STRATEGY CHALLENGING THE GLOBAL DIMENSION WORKING WITH PARTNERS

Key Challenges in Forestry (and importance of education in forestry)

Sustainable Forest Management and the Ecosystem Approach Two Concepts, One Goal

NOW: also at RATE CARD travel agencies FESTSPIEL-GUIDE 18. YEAR SEASON 2017 / Controlled Circulation

Country profile. More from less material resource efficiency in Europe overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries.

Q&A: Omineca spruce beetle outbreak May 4, 2018

FAO STRATEGY FOR FORESTS AND FORESTRY

Climate Proofing for Protected Area and Natural Resources Management

EN 1 EN ACTION FICHE FOR BELARUS - (ENPI AAP 2008) 1. IDENTIFICATION

Implications of Climate Change for FFH- Forest Habitat Types

Land Use Management, Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity

Adapting Forestry Programs for Climate Change

Adapting to climate change in nature conservation in Europe

Uneven-age Stand Management. a.k.a. Uneven-aged (Sized) Silviculture Walt Wintturi- Watershed to Wildlife

PRO SILVA POLAND VISIT An account of forest discussions

Hammamet, Tunisia 30th September-2nd Ocober 2010 Workshop: Adapting Mediterranean forests to climate change: Genetic/Economics/Management Name: Ilija

Government Response. to the Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia

The ecosystem-based approach to adaptation: Concepts and implementation

The Federal Institute of Risk Assessment at a glance dates, facts and background

7 th FOREST EUROPE Ministerial Conference. Madrid 2015

Intra-Community Trade Statistics

State Forest Management: Pennsylvania

European Forest Risk Facility

European Conference on Biodiversity and Climate Change (ECBCC)

Building strategic partnerships to enhance urban resilience Partnership between Bonn and La Paz

Draft Northwest Territories Conservation Areas Action Plan Frequently Asked Questions

Coordinated European Animal Welfare Network (EUWelNet)

Connect-Collect-Exchange. European Forest Risk Facility FRISK The SURE Project. Exchange of Experts EoE

Innovation activities of renewable power generation technology providers in Germany

THE INWENT CAPACITY BUILDING CONCEPT

A forest pest is not always a forest pest

Terms of Reference for Consultancy Services of Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) in Mountain Ecosystem in Nepal

LABOR MARKET INTEGRATION SUCCESS FACTOR CIVIL SOCIETY

International practice and experience with Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS)

Pro Silva Jahrestagung 2018

Adaptation of silviculture to climate change

Transcription:

Biodiversity and ungulate management in managed forests Authors: Stefan SCHNEIDER *, Hans VON DER GOLTZ *, Alexander HELD ** Ungulate effects on silviculture and forest biodiversity are a controversial and emotional topic across Europe. To get to a more objective and fact based debate related to the equilibrium of forest regeneration, forest biodiversity and ungulate population densities, the BioWild Project was set up as a multidisciplinary joint research cooperation between the Universities of Dresden, Gottingen, Munich and the ProSilva Germany association (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Naturgemäße Waldwirtschaft e.v.) as lead partner. The project is supported by numerous partners such as forest practitioners, nature and environmental protection agencies, hunters, forest owners, researchers and woodprocessing industries. The EFI Central European Regional Office EFICENT is serving in the Project Advisory Board. Generating an objective Database Because there is no reliable scientific data available for ground vegetation under a given ungulate population the BioWild Project wants to assess within a six year period the equilibrium state in between natural forest regeneration and the browsing influence of ungulates, taking into account the specific characteristics within different representative regions in Germany. The regularly taken records within approximately 250 control fences (game exclosure fences), each 12 x 12 meters in size (and the corresponding non fenced witness areas) will allow researchers to come to objective conclusions about the overall state of the ground vegetation as well as about the balance between forest vegetation and ungulate populations, allowing the project partners to develop general forest and game management concepts for addressing and solving these issues. Guiding principles for policy and decision support will be formulated. Figure 1: The first BioWild ex closure fence was built in spring 2016 in the State forest of Schmallenberg, North Rhine Westphalia in a stand dominated by European beech (altitude: about 700 m above the sea level) with local admixtures of spruce and silver fir. Photographer: Stefan Schneider 1

Finding ways to secure the future of mixed, stable and resilient forests and the resulting ecosystem services, new strategies for creating and maintaining a balance between natural forest vegetation and ungulates will be tested across five pilot regions in Germany. To create variance within the data set, the five BioWild Project regions covering about 25,000 ha of forest lands are within the federal states of Baden Wuerttemberg, North Rhine Westphalia, Saarland, Saxony Anhalt and Thuringia. Those five pilot regions include state forest as well as communal and private forest lands; while hunting is done either by forest owners themselves or by external hunters leasing the hunting rights on the forest areas. On this broad basis a gradient of hunting habits, topography, elevation and soil fertility of forest sites etc. might be detected and hopefully representative results for most German forest sites will be obtained linking individual biodiversity parameters to browsing intensity and wildlife management models. Raising awareness through an information and communication process All project partners agree on the fact that forest proprietors as owner of the shooting right and the hunters as hunting tenant should work closely together to achieve a defined and formulated silvicultural objective. This particularly means that they both need to talk to each other to find jointly agreed solutions. To promote communication among all actors hunting activities in the project sites are accompanied by an intensive information and communication process. To regularly inform all participants of the BioWild Project as well as a broader public in a comprehensive and transparent way and to promote a raising social awareness a project homepage was set up. The link www.biowildprojekt.de enables everyone to access easily comprehensive information about the project, its objectives as well as the actual state of the project. In addition, all internet users may have access to closer information about the project members and its related staff, as well as information about the pilot project sites via a geo information viewer. Visitors may also find information about events as well as recent publications or newspaper articles related to the project. 2

Figure 2: Recent information about the BioWild Project are now available under www.biowildprojekt.de. The homepage is also optimized for mobile use. Photographer: Stefan Schneider Adaptation of hunting strategies and regulations for the sake of forest regeneration Regulations, each based on the local hunting legislation of the five respective federal states of Germany had been modified in favor of the project objectives, promoting a synchronization of hunting periods for all game species. This measure will improve the legal situation for all hunters and forest owners within the pilot regions who want to reduce excessive ungulate populations in forest ecosystems. If those new hunting possibilities are implemented or not and how hunting is exercised (individual hunting, driven hunt, etc.) remains within the unique responsibility of each hunter only restricted by animal welfare and wildlife biology expertise. Within the breeding season and in late winter the new rules prohibit all hunting activities. The overall objectives of the BioWild Project The results of the project will contribute to a rising awareness within the nationwide (and hopefully trans boundary) public opinion, particularly within the group of forest owners since diverse and species rich forest ecosystems crucially contribute to maintain biodiversity, to help connecting biotopes, to protect our climate and to provide environmental services. Robust and diverse ecosystems also generate steadily stable revenues for forest owners at a much lower risk compared to monocultures. 3

Figure 3: Tubex wildlife protection esthetics on a storm damaged forest area in the administrative district of Siegen Wittgenstein in North Rhine Westphalia. An (expensive) imposition for forest owners and visitors. Photographer: Hans von der Goltz Based on project observations the project members will demonstrate to the public, and to the participating forest owners in particular, which immediate and long term effects (ecological and economic) their decisions have on silvicultural issues or hunting. For this purpose, the project results will be processed as easily understandable demonstration sites in the pilot regions. They will serve as excursion and field day destinations for forest managers, hunters, experts as well as the general public. Further, the demonstration sites are also of importance in the wider European context. A number of countries are currently revising their hunting policies for mitigating the ungulate effects in forest ecosystems. The BioWild Project and its demonstration sites serve as point of reference. EFI, via its Regional Office EFICENT, is supporting countries and forest owners in reviewing existing wildlife management regulations as well as supporting the development of new wildlife policies. The BioWild demonstration sites are a very important tool for these EFI activities and will be used for the EFI Exchange of Experts (EoE Forest) activities. Project funded via the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation The project period is from 15th September 2015 to 31st August 2021. The six year project budget is about 2.47 million, of which 1.89 million are financed by the German National Biodiversity Program with funds of the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) with resources of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB). The remaining 0.58 million are financed by the four network partners, partially with contributions of forest owners, forest administrations and non governmental organizations. 4

* For further information please contact the project manager Stefan SCHNEIDER ANW Deutschland e.v. Projektbüro BioWild Wormbacher Straße 1 57392 Schmallenberg Germany Tel: +49 (0) 29 72 / 98 49 379 E mail: waldwild@anw deutschland.de Homepage: www.biowildprojekt.de ** European Forest Institute Regional Office EFICENT Wonnhaldestr. 4 79100 Freiburg Germany 5