STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA Employee Performance Management System

Similar documents
Rutgers University Performance Evaluation Form for Fiscal Year - (fill in) Union of Rutgers Administrators-American Federation of Teachers (URA-AFT)

CLASSIFIED STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

UNIVERSITY RELATIONS EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Southern University System Annual Employee Evaluation Form for Executive Level Staff/Directors/Department Heads

ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM FY18

ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND EVALUATION FORM FY19

Performance Evaluation

Iredell Statesville Schools Classified Evaluation Form

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. The University of North Carolina General Administration THIS LETTER TRANSMITS CHANGES TO THE UNC POLICY MANUAL

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

Performance Review & Evaluation Form

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REVIEW

NCEES Process: Getting Started for Teachers. Educator Effectiveness Staff

Tennessee State University Employee Performance Evaluation

5 CFR AND DODI V431 EXCERPTS. (Lesson 6 Evaluating Performance)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

TURTLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION FORM JOB TITLE: DATE: Other:

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. Karl Pfister Adrienne Jeffries

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A SUPERVISOR S GUIDE

Commendable Satisfactory Needs Improvement

I. Purpose Newly hired employees will be subject to an introductory period during their first (90) days of employment with Montgomery County.

CAREER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Supervisor. Type of Evaluation: Probationary* (6 month evaluation)

PART A - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Comprehensive Form

Subject Matter Professional Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

EMPLOYEE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Superintendent s Circular

Tennessee State University Annual Employee Performance Evaluation

Three Rivers Community Schools Support Staff Performance Assessment

EvalS. Performance Evaluation Management System. Professional Faculty Supervisor Guide to EvalS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS

Appendix C Classified Employee Evaluation Form

TSA MD , Handbook

University of Minnesota - Academic Health Center Employee Performance Appraisal Tool

Management Performance Appraisal FY16. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Policy(ies) Superseded: 1246, HREO-146 Revised: May 2012, August 2016

Completing the Dialogue for Direction Form Review for Non-Exempt Employees

PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Projected Probationary End Date:

Combined Performance Appraisal Form with an integrated Training Needs Analysis. Compliments of Training Games, Inc.

Appendix C Classified Employee Evaluation Form Unit A CSEA Chapter 262

Performance Evaluation for Non-Exempt Employees Employer Instructions

New Employee Evaluation Form

UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Leadership Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

INTERNSHIP CHECKLIST

Auburn University Performance Management Planning and Review Form

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE & SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM SUPERVISORY GUIDE

University of Houston-Victoria Job Performance Appraisal

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

Classification Appeals Process

University System of Maryland Board of Regents

Academic Staff Annual Evaluation Form Revision. (Time period being reviewed) To Be Completed By The Employee. Name Title. Division/Department

New York State University Police Police Lieutenant Annual Performance Appraisal Instructions

Schedule 7: Employee Performance Appraisal

School of Veterinary Medicine Academic & University Staff Performance Evaluation Form

Performance Planning and Appraisal Document

CSEA PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

TEAM MEMBER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Management Review Form (#PM1)

Truck Driver. City of Performance Evaluation Form

EMPLOYEE RETENTION Human Resource Manual Trainer s Allowance Section 315 LEARNING AGREEMENT

2018 Performance Evaluation Process LOUISVILLE.EDU

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY

EMPLOYEE JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

NC STATE UNIVERSITY. Dr. William E. Winner Coordinator, Env. Sci. Program Jordan Hall 2231 Phone:

Board of Regents Staff Awards

GENERAL COMPENSATION POLICY

Western Illinois University Pay for Exceptional Performance Guide for Civil Service Personnel

Equipment Operator. City of Performance Evaluation Form

McDowell Technical Community College

Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff

NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT WAS TABLED FOR FURTHER REVIEW SEE MINUTES OF 12 JULY University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The following presentation will review the new performance appraisal process for staff and administrators and explain how merit pay can be achieved

Administrative and Professional Staff (Unclassified) Performance Evaluation Model A

DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY 2017 Staff Employee Annual Review

Classified Performance Planning, Progress Review, and Evaluation Form FY20

Limestone District School Board Performance Appraisal Professional Development & Learning Plan Support Staff

Board of Regents Staff Awards

CAREER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Employee. Type of Evaluation: Probationary* (6 month evaluation)

AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PERFORMANCE CYCLE

EXIT INTERVIEW GUIDE. Employee: Classification:

CAMBRIDGE. Dental Practice Consultants DENTAL EMPLOYEE EVALUATION FORM. Employee Name

University System of Maryland Board of Regents

Skilled Laborer. City of Performance Evaluation Form

UNIT 11 Performance Evaluation Graduate Assistants, Instructional Student Assistants, Teaching Associates

Employee Name: Employee Position Title, Department:

UNIT 11 Performance Evaluation Graduate Assistants, Instructional Student Assistants, Teaching Associates

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE

Performance Evaluation. Review Period: / / to / / Section I INSTRUCTIONS

page 1 1. JOB KNOWLEDGE RATING

Office of Academic Affairs Staff Evaluation

STAFF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Kyrene School District Reclassification Review Process

RE-CLASSIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

North Orange County Community College District CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (PERMANENT) PART I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

20 Annual Performance Review

Transcription:

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA Employee Performance Management System Name Agency South Carolina Forestry Commission Employee ID Number Department Position Classification Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Rating Officer Reviewed by Employee (Signature of the employee indicates the Planning Stage and Position Description were reviewed with the employee.) EVALUATION STAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Rating Officer Reviewed by Reviewing Officer Comments Employee (My signature indicates that I was given the opportunity to discuss the official performance review with my supervisor - not that I necessarily agree.) Employee Comments

INSTRUCTIONS The Planning Stage Job Functions - The supervisor, utilizing suggestions from the employee, shall select job duties from the employee's most recent position description and develop success criteria for each duty. Objectives - This section allows the supervisor to include any additional special projects or program assignments that are not on the position description but that are assigned to the employee during the rating period. Objectives are optional, but if used, success criteria are required for each objective. Performance Characteristics - Performance characteristics and their definitions should be directly related to the employee's job and may be selected by the supervisor and the employee from a list developed by the Office of Human Resources. All management and supervisory employees are required to be reviewed on "promoting equal opportunity." The supervisor should meet with the employee to discuss the position description and how it relates to the job functions and objectives for the upcoming year. After this discussion, the supervisor shall complete the planning stage of the document. Prior to discussing the completed planning stage with the employee, the supervisor will present the final document to the reviewing officer for signature. The supervisor will then meet with the employee to review the final plans for the year and obtain the employee's signature. The completed planning document should be maintained by the agency to be used as the evaluation document at the end of the review period. The Evaluation Stage The supervisor will complete the evaluation document based on the employee's performance for the entire year. Using the four levels of performance outlined below, job functions and objectives shall be rated on how well the employee has met the success criteria as outlined in the planning stage. Performance characteristics will be rated "acceptable" or "unacceptable" based on the definitions which were communicated to the employee in the planning stage. The characteristics shall be used as a communication tool and shall not be weighted in the determination of the overall performance rating. Once the supervisor has completed the evaluation document, it will be presented to the reviewing officer for signature. The supervisor will then schedule a meeting with the employee to discuss his/her performance and to obtain the employee's signature on the evaluation document. The evaluation must be completed prior to the review date to be timely. Four Levels of Performance (To rate job functions, objectives and overall performance) Meets Performance Requirements - Work that meets the success criteria for the job. Exceeds Performance Requirements - Work that is above the success criteria for the job throughout the rating period. Substantially Exceeds Performance Requirements - Work that is characterized by exemplary accomplishments throughout the rating period; performance that is considerably and consistently above the success criteria of the job. Below Performance Requirements - Work that fails to meet the success criteria of the job. (Performance characteristics will not be rated with the four levels of performance. They should be rated as "acceptable" or "unacceptable.")

JOB FUNCTIONS Performance Level 1. Job Duty : Success Criteria 2. Job Duty Success Criteria: 3. Job Duty: Success Criteria: 4. Job Duty: Success Criteria 5. Job Duty: Success Criteria:. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

1. Objective (Include Success Criteria): OBJECTIVES (Optional) 2. Objective (Include Success Criteria): 3. Objective (Include Success Criteria): ACTUAL PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS 1. Characteristic: Acceptable / Unacceptable 2. Characteristic: 3. Characteristic SUMMARY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN Identify the employee's major accomplishments, areas needing improvement, and steps to improve present and future performance. APPRAISAL RESULTS Substantially Exceeds Exceeds Meets Below

2024 © businessdocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback