Arizona Crop Information Site Technical Support IPM Proposal 2005

Similar documents
Extension Ag (ICM) Team, Special Session on the Extension Strategic Hiring Plan May 14, 2014 Not Present:

Crop Pest Losses and Impact Assessment Work Group ( ) Final Report to the Western IPM Center September 4, 2009

Crop Pest Losses and Impact Assessment Work Group ( ) Final Report to the Western IPM Center September 30, 2011

Evaluation of Extension Guidelines for Whitefly Management IPM Proposal 2005

Arizona Vegetable IPM Team

2011 Grant Report. Goals/Objectives

Crop Insect Losses and Impact Assessment Working Group ( ) Progress Report to the Western IPM Center August 2, 2006

IPM? Risk Reduction. Cooperative Extension Programs. Chronology

EPA Docket: EPA HQ OPP

Pesticide Reporting: Why should you care? January 2014

Diagnostics Leadership Team Maricopa Agricultural Center April 3, :00 am to 1:00 pm

Area wide Incidence of Whiteflies and CYSDV In Fall Melons in Yuma County,

Extension Ag Team - Fall Planning Meeting Maricopa Agricultural Center August 8, :00 am 1:00 pm

TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE EXTENSION SERVICE JOB DESCRIPTION NAME: EXTENSION AGENT-IPM

Risk Avoidance & Mitigation Program

EPA Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP Date: August 22, 2018

NATIONAL ROAD MAP FOR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT NATIONAL PRIORITIES SETTING. National IPM Road AP? WORKSHOP

I. IPM Working Groups (IWGs): Support for the Vegetable IPM Working Group to Keep Working

Cross Commodity Management of Whiteflies and Chemical Efficacy in Arizona

Exports to 70 countries

Insect Losses and Management on Desert Lettuce:

Insect Losses and Insecticide Use In Arizona Vegetables J. Palumbo, A. Fournier, P. Ellsworth, P. Clay, and K. Nolte

IPM Coordination & IPM Assessment

Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1993

Controlling Cotton Root Rot through Improved Fungicide Application Techniques

Cotton Variety Testing Results

Cross-commodity Guidelines and Resistance Management:

EPA Docket: EPA- HQ- OPP Date Submitted: January 17, 2017

IPM PROGRAM. Plan of Work. Program Overview

Actara/Platinum: cotton, melons, leafy vegetables Assail: cotton, leafy vegetables. 2) Multiple applications allowed by labels.

Controlling Cotton Root Rot through Improved Fungicide Application Techniques

Insecticide Usage on Desert Lettuce,

Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1993

Strategic Plan. Virginia Tech s AHS Agricultural Research and Extension Center Winchester, Virginia January 2013.

Weed Workgroup Strategic Plan

Pesticide Applicator Training/Testing for Noxious/Invasive Weed Management in Northern Arizona

Final Report Reducing Pesticide Use On Turfgrass Through Integrated Pest Management Practices

Adapted from Naranjo & Ellsworth 2009, & Ellsworth, unpubl. Stink Bugs in AZ Cotton October Stink Bugs in AZ Cotton October 2013

their value and contributions in the Land Grant University

Many agencies, both federal and state, as well as various public organizations have come together to create the materials used for the Collaborative

Western Integrated Pest Management Center

REEport Final Report Template for Formula or Grant Projects

Defoliation of Pima Cotton

Curriculum Vitae. Barry R. Tickes

Defining and Refining Cri-cal Uses of Chlorpyrifos in Alfalfa

ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE MEASURES. LA DOTD Quality and Continuous Improvement Program February 28, 2018

Texas Extension IPM Program Review November 12, 1999

Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans

ARIZONA. September 14, 2016

HORTICULTURE AND SMALL FARMS

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Self-Assessment of the Stockbridge School of Agriculture Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

The Arizona Cotton Advisory Program

AES Agreements. September 8, CALS Business Services

NRCS EQIP and CSP IPM Programs. IPM Implementation Trends, Cost Effectiveness, and Recommendations for Optimizing NRCS Investments in Conservation

Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service

Vegetable Diagnostics 101: Insects and Diseases

TOD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. Stakeholder Workshop

The Arizona Cotton Advisory Program

inside 3 Arkansas economy is on solid ground Arkansas counts on agriculture Total impact Bringing in the harvest The Value Added advantage

A Cross-Commodity Challenge

2.) IDENTIFY ANY SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS AND RESULTS OF THE PROJECT TO DATE.

2008 Needs Assessment Survey of the New York State Greenhouse Industry

Value Added. Economic Impact of Agriculture in Arkansas

SWES 2021 STRATEGIC PLAN

V(A). Planned Program (Summary)

2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Deep Dive. Heather Roberts-Wrenn June 23 rd, 2017

USDA Climate Hubs: Enabling Climate- Informed Decision-Making

FY19 MCOTA Outreach Support Proposed May 22, 2018

Logan County Health District. Strategic Plan

Extension Implementation Program. Departments {NO DATA ENTERED}

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE S SMALL FARMS PROGRAM

University of Missouri Extension January 1, 2017 January 31, 2018 Proposals. Technology tools for phosphorus and nitrogen management

Horticulture and Small Farms

V(A). Planned Program (Summary)

Assessing Cotton Yield Loss to Hail Damage in Southern Arizona

Economic Issues for Raisins January 10, 2018 Fresno, California

Research into policy: Creating the enabling policy environment for biological control agents (BCA) in Kenya

Bachelor of Science in Crop Production

- 2 - sprayer and a check (unsprayed) plot of tomatoes. Recommendations on suitability of the equipment as well as operational procedures is expected

NASCIO 2004 Recognition Awards Missouri Project Oversight Program. Executive Summary

Evaluation & Accountability

Bachelor of Science in Sustainable Plant Systems

WELCOME TO THE 2012 CALIFORNIA GARLIC & ONION SYMPOSIUM. Kevin Lehar Chairman California Garlic & Onion Research Advisory Board

FY19 MCOTA Outreach Support Potential Ideas March 15, KEY WORDS Transit coordination, Minnesota, community transportation, rural transportation

Date awarded: 9/1/06 FRS# CRIS# Project # ARZT G Principle Investigators:

A Working Description of the Penn State Apple Orchard Consultant, an Expert System

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE: Building Partnerships and a Network with the Pesticide Industry

The IR-4 Project 50 Years of Supporting Pest Control Products for Specialty Crops & Minor Uses

Scirtothrips dorsalis IPM-PIPE

Promoting Stakeholder Acceptance of CBT 1. J. Patrick Jones Professional Examination Service

Bachelor of Science in Crop Production

Keys to Successful Programming: Incentives in Multi-Institutional Partnerships

MAINSTREET SCOPE OF WORK

The Caribbean Agrometeorological Initiative (CAMI): Achievements, Shortfalls and the Way Forward

Soybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

The University of Illinois Extension. International and Multicultural Programming. Extension Global Connect Strategic Plan

Lake Ontario Fruit Program Quarterly Highlights Jan-March, 2017

Presenters: Jerold R. Thomas Daney Jackson

Impact of the NYS IPM Program s Network for Environment & Weather Awareness (NEWA) on agricultural production

Transcription:

Arizona Crop Information Site Technical Support IPM Proposal 2005 Project Leaders: Al Fournier, John Palumbo, Peter C. Ellsworth, Pat Clay U of A Team Members: Barry Tickes (Yuma co.) Pat Clay (Pinal/Maricopa co.), Steve Husman, vice-husman (Pinal/Pima co.), vice-bequette (Yuma co.), Bill McCloskey, Russ Tronstad, Trent Teegerstrom, Mary Olsen, Paul Brown, Tim Dennehy, Yves Carriere, Ed Martin, Eric Norton (La Paz co.), Randy Norton (Graham co.), Jeffrey Silvertooth, Paul Brown Location: Worldwide Situation/Critical Issue to be Addressed: The mission of the Arizona Crop Information Site (ACIS) is to provide growers, PCAs, pest managers, and allied agricultural industries, county Extension personnel, researchers, state and Federal regulators, and the general public with current, independent, researchbased desert crop production and protection information. Since its inception, ACIS has greatly enhanced stakeholder access to critical, timely information related to Arizona crop management across all major crops and all types of pests. ACIS has facilitated rapid dissemination of scientific information that has helped to inform pest management decision-making and other crop production efforts statewide. Growers, PCAs, and other stakeholders have attested to the importance and usefulness of ACIS to their crop and pest management activities (see attached Position Statement). Monthly activity on the site is on the order of tens of thousands of hits. The ACIS website has been used by numerous Extension personnel as important communication and distribution channels and links to key clientele. The value of this critical communication tool, which our clientele have come to rely on, is current threatened following the loss of the Program Coordinator (J. Jones) last fall and lack of available staff to maintain and expand this valuable resource. ACIS has not been significantly updated since October, 2004. Ultimately, this shortcoming impedes our ability as Extension educators to communicate critical information to our agricultural clientele in a timely and economic manner and forces us to rely on more diffuse and less efficient methods of communication. In the long-run, this will impact our relationship and credibility with key stakeholder groups, who may turn to other, less independent and less science-based, information sources (primarily industry). Outcomes - Impacts: Short-term: A short-term benefit of this project will be nearly immediate availability of recentlygenerated data and educational information. Medium-term: Availability of timely information will improve crop/pest management practices in multiple crops. ACIS will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of communication efforts of Extension educators (on campus, in counties, and at research centers), which should improve morale and time management of U of A staff. All stakeholders will benefit from this proposal, as will U of A Cooperative Extension, through increased effectiveness of interaction with stakeholders.

Improved communication with stakeholders achieved through ACIS will inform our grant-writing efforts and improve our competitiveness for regional and national funding by increasing stakeholder input. Long-term: ACIS support will improve our relationship and credibility with agricultural clientele. A long-term goal is to extend the ACIS model to other program foci, particularly community IPM, including turf, horticulture, school IPM and structural IPM. Plan for Evaluation: The usefulness and vitality of ACIS will be measured by the number of web hits to various areas of the site. The functionality, relevance, and content of ACIS will be evaluated through stakeholder input via meetings, workshops, and surveys aimed at needs assessment. Outputs: Activities: Organization, development, formatting and posting of a backlog of crop/pest management information and data. For example, o Linkages to and contextual location of 04 and 05 CALS commodity reports o UA Cooperative Extension IPM Publication No. 8 o Cotton Insect Losses 2004 o Vegetable Insect Losses 2004 o Print versions of recent, relevant Extension presentations (numerous) o Report to the Western Region IPM coordinating committee (WERA-69) o Updates on the Arizona Plant Diagnostic Network and national system o And, notices of emerging threats, e.g., detections of Q-biotype whiteflies Outreach efforts to educate growers, Extension agents, and other clientele about the contents and functionality of ACIS. Evaluation of ACIS design, content and effectiveness for serving clientele needs. This will be accomplished by obtaining stakeholder feedback on ACIS at meetings, workshops, and through survey questions. Products: New and revised information posted to ACIS; some information may also be reproduced in Extension bulletins, fact sheets, newsletters and other traditional Extension formats as needed or appropriate. Participation: Major users of ACIS include growers, PCAs, pest managers, and allied agricultural industries, county Extension personnel, researchers, state and Federal regulators.

Inputs: Funding for salary support for a Web specialist to maintain and expand ACIS and related databases. This may be offset by other funding sources generated through future external grants. Estimated Budget: $5,000 for salary support; will be offset by future external funding sources.

SITUATION ARIZONA CROP INFORMATION SITE TECHNICAL SUPPORT 2005 IPM PROPOSAL INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES IMPACT Activities Participation Short Medium Long Term The Arizona Crop Information Site (ACIS) provides growers, PCAs, pest managers, and allied agricultural industries, county Extension personnel, researchers, state and Federal regulators, and the general public with current, independent, research-based desert crop production and protection information. Since its inception, ACIS has greatly enhanced stakeholder access to critical, timely information related to Arizona crop management across all major crops and all types of pests. The scientific information provided by ACIS has informed pest management decision-making and other crop production efforts statewide. The value of this critical communication tool, which our clientele have come to rely on, is currently threatened following the loss of the Program Coordinator last fall and lack of available staff to maintain and expand this valuable resource. ACIS has not been significantly updated since October, 2004. Ultimately, this shortcoming impedes our ability as Extension educators to communicate critical information to our agricultural clientele in a timely and economic manner and forces us to rely on more diffuse and less efficient methods of communication. In the long-run this will impact our relationship and credibility with key stakeholder groups, who may turn to other, less independent and less science-based, information sources (primarily industry). Funding for salary support for a Web specialist to maintain and expand ACIS and related databases. This may be offset by other funding sources generated through future external grants. Organization, development, formatting and posting of a backlog of crop management information and data. Outreach efforts to educate growers, Extension agents, and other clientele about the contents and functionality of ACIS. Evaluation of ACIS design, content and effectiveness for serving clientele needs. This will be accomplished by obtaining stakeholder feedback on ACIS at meetings, workshops, and through survey questions. Products: New and revised information posted to ACIS; some information may also be reproduced in Extension bulletins, fact sheets, newsletters and other traditional Extension formats. Major users of ACIS include growers, PCAs, pest managers, and allied agricultural industries, county Extension personnel, researchers, state and Federal regulators, policy-makers, and clients worldwide. A benefit of this project will be nearly immediate availability of recently-generated data and educational information. Increased efficiency and use of time of Specialists and Agents who depend on ACIS. Availability of timely information will improve crop/pest management practices in multiple crops. ACIS will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of communication efforts of Extension educators (on campus, in counties, and at research centers), which should improve morale and time management of U of A staff. All stakeholders will benefit from this proposal, as will U of A Cooperative Extension, through increased effectiveness of interaction with stakeholders. Improved communication with stakeholders achieved through ACIS will inform our grant-writing efforts and improve our competitiveness for regional and national funding. ACIS support will improve our relationship and credibility with agricultural clientele A long-term goal is to extend the ACIS model to other program foci, particularly community IPM, including turf, horticulture, school IPM and structural IPM.