National Quality Code Schema

Similar documents
National Environmental Monitoring Standards. Water Meter Data. Acquisition of Electronic Data from Water Meters for Water Resource Management

District Arable Dairy Finishing Forestry Grazingorticulture Special All Farms Lifestyle

Soil Water Measurement

District Arable Dairy Finishing Forestry Grazing Horticultu Special All Farms Lifestyle

District Arable Dairy Finishing Forestry Grazing Horticultu Special All Farms Lifestyle

District Arable Dairy Finishing Forestry Grazing Horticultu Special All Farms Lifestyle

National Environmental Monitoring Standard. Turbidity. Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Turbidity Data. Final Draft Version: 1.

INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Monitoring Standards and Technologies for the compilation and reporting of water quality data across New Zealand (DRAFT)

ACCORD TWO YEARS ON... SUMMARY. What have we achieved? What do we need to keep working on? SUSTAINABLE DAIRYING WATER

THREE YEARS ON... SUSTAINABLE DAIRYING WATER. Progress summary for the 2015/16 season ACCORD. A commitment to New Zealand by the dairy sector

Intractable Agricultural Chemicals in New Zealand

Predicting PV Uptake in New Zealand SEANZ 2016 The Power Shift. Sharee McNab, Alan Wood, Scott Lemon, Allan Miller 18 November 2016

UPPER NORTH ISLAND STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT (UNISA) Between

The Dairying and clean streams accord: snapshot of progress 2008/2009

Assesing the availability of composting facilities for events in New Zealand

NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT. New Zealand Government Procurement Business Survey 2018

THE DAIRYING AND CLEAN STREAMS ACCORD: SNAPSHOT OF PROGRESS 2009/2010

Stock Number Survey as at 30 June 2017

Department of Conservation. Staged process for allocation of concessions for Beekeeping on Public Conservation Land. September August 2016

The Maori Commercial Aquaculture Settlement New Space Plan

Local Government Leaders Climate Change Declaration

Job market strong but it might not last long

Scale, impact and sources of plastic pollution in New Zealand. Local Government New Zealand s submission to the Environment Select Committee

Kiwi jobs market running out of puff

Surface water components of New Zealand s National Water Accounts,

CLEAN FILLS, MANAGED FILLS & C & D FILLS - SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

Water Measurement Programme - Bay of Plenty Region

Reserve Bank of New Zealand Analytical Note Series 1. Analytical Notes. In search of greener pastures: improving the REINZ farm price index

Progress toward identifying potentially earthquake-prone buildings: November 2018

Te Uru Rakau Forward Work Programme & 1 Billion Trees. IUFRO Extension & Knowledge Exchange Conference Christchurch, 10 September 2018

Proposed Southland Water and Land Plan Hearing Statement

Hydrological and Meteorological Structures

Vote Forestry. APPROPRIATION MINISTER(S): Minister of Forestry (M35) APPROPRIATION ADMINISTRATOR: Ministry for Primary Industries

A WASTED OPPORTUNITY. Using the waste. disposal levy to create economic & ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGE. for AOTEAROA. new zealand.

Delivering Freshwater Reform

FACT PAPER FOR HAVELOCK NORTH. 2. The paper addresses Issue 2 and related matters:

SURVEY OF RURAL DECISION MAKERS: TRUST, GOALS, & MANAGEMENT

DHB National Catalogue - National Product Catalogue (GS1net) Pricing by GLN

Surface water quantity

Definition and calculation of freshwater quantity overallocation. Prepared for Ministry for the Environment

Climate Change : Facts and Future Scenarios

Branding pack for Independent Award Centres version 2

New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT RMA POLICY AND PLANS HERITAGE PROVISIONS

Tool 2.4: Overview of Drainage Tools

The Inconsistent Regional Management of Farming Effects on Waterways Maree Baker Galloway Paper presented at the 2013 NZARES Conference

Irrigation in Hawke s Bay: Application of the River Values Assessment System (RiVAS)

Electronic Identification Making It Work For Me

DISCLAIMER BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE

Registered Marks 2015 A guide to using our registered marks

Policy on Earthquake Prone Buildings

HALF YEARLY EMPLOYERS SURVEY SUMMARY FINDINGS

The Inconsistent Regional Management of Farming Effects on Waterways

Registered Marks 201 1

Trends in Olsen P Test Over Time for the Waikato Region

Monitoring and Review Project - Gap Analysis

PRELIMINARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF NZ GROUNDWATER WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO INFANT METHAEMOGLOBINAEMIA

NUS RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICY. Ver 1.6

TECHNICAL GOVERNANCE AND ADVISORY STRUCTURES FOR THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Visibility in New Zealand

Better economic development in local government

Economic Stimulus Package RCA Forum

>> New Zealand s Environmental Reporting Series Air domain report

Annual Report on Drinking- water Quality Released 2018 health.govt.nz

Phoenix Energy Holdings Gas Ltd Health & Safety Policy

6. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CREATION OF A UNITARY AUTHORITY

BEST FIT FOR NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

It s the orange-top one eh?

Position Description Hawke s Bay Regional Council Chief Executive

NEW ZEALAND DIVERSITY SURVEY

IS Kawerau Electricity Resource Background Study

Petroleum road tanker drivers: Evaluation and exposure to noise

A consultation document for Government Departments, Crown Entities, and other State Sector Agencies

Independent Review Badminton New Zealand

A REVIEW OF ACHIEVABLE EFFICIENCIES AND ASSOCIATED ISSUES UNDER OUTPUT AND PERFORMANCE BASED CONTRACTS

Position Description

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Hydrometric Network Review. April 2016

Part Two: Overview of Governance Issues 13

State Highway Network Resilience National Programme Business Case

Richard Montgomerie. Qualifications. Professional Affiliations. Career Summary. Employment Record. MSc (Ecology) - Otago University.

NEW ZEALAND DIVERSITY SURVEY

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Quick quarterly statistics

Improving resource consent conditions

REPORT. Flow Naturalisation for Six Hawke s Bay River Catchments: Tutaekuri, Waipawa, Tukipo, Tukituki, Maraetotara and Porangahau

GUIDANCE NOTE 37 MEDICAL GASES DATA INTEGRITY

Print advertising rates: Stuff community newspapers

Application of ISO/IEC 17020:2012 AS IB C1. of inspection bodies. for accreditation. specific criteria

AND STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF RICHARD JOHN MATTHEWS

Residential water tariffs in New Zealand

Graphics Standards and Brand Guidelines. Conquer every challenge with the brand that s Always on Duty.

CESIG Compliance and Enforcement Special Interest Group

HSE 01 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER

Four key electricity issues: A briefing

Discussion paper for the stakeholder meeting of 9 December 2014

Introduction Sustainable Waterloo Region Brand

Public Health Sector: Pay and Employment Equity Review. Report & Response Plan

Guide to the 2018 National Construction Pipeline Report

Let s get real Overview

Irrigation Evaluation Code of Practice

Transcription:

National Environmental Monitoring Standards National Quality Code Schema Version: 1.0 Date of Issue: June 2013

NEMS Standards Documents The following standards can be found at www.landandwater.co.nz. National Quality Coding Schema Safe Acquisition of Field Data In and Around Fresh Water Code of Practice Dissolved Oxygen Recording Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Dissolved Oxygen Data Open Channel Flow Measurement Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Open Channel Flow Data Rainfall Recording Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Rainfall Intensity Data Soil Water Measurement Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Soil Water Content Data Turbidity Recording Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Turbidity Data. Water Level Recording Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Water Level Data Water Meter Data Acquisition of Electronic Data from Water Meters for Water Resource Management Water Temperature Recording Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Water Temperature Data Limitations It is assumed that as a minimum the reader of these documents has undertaken industry based training and has a basic understanding of environmental monitoring techniques. Instructions for manufacturer specific instrumentation and methodologies are not included in this document. The information contained in these NEMS documents relies upon material and data derived from a number of third party sources. The documents do not relieve the user (or a person on whose behalf it is used) of any obligation or duty that might arise under any legislation, and any regulations and rules under those acts, covering the activities to which this document has been or is to be applied. The information in this document is provided voluntarily and for information purposes only. Neither NEMS nor any organisation involved in the compilation of this document guarantee that the information is complete, current or correct and accepts no responsibility for unsuitable or inaccurate material that may be encountered. Neither NEMS, nor any employee or agent of the Crown, nor any author of or contributor to this document shall be responsible or liable for any loss, damage, personal injury or death howsoever caused. When implementing these standards, the following act, regulations and code of practice shall be complied with: Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 Health and Safety in Employment Regulations 1995 NEMS Safe Acquisition of Field Data In and Around Fresh Water, Code of Practice 2012

National Environmental Monitoring Standards (NEMS) The National Environmental Monitoring Standards steering group (NEMS) has prepared a series of environmental monitoring standards on authority from the Regional Chief Executive Officers (RCEO) and the Ministry for the Environment (MFE). The strategy that led to the development of these standards was established by Jeff Watson (Chairman) and Rob Christie (Project Director). The implementation of the strategy has been overseen by a steering group consisting of Jeff Watson, Rob Christie, Jochen Schmidt, Martin Doyle, Phil White, Mike Ede, Glenn Ellery, Lian Potter, Lucy Baker, Eddie Stead and David Payne. The development of these standards involved consultation with regional and unitary councils across New Zealand, electricity generation industry representatives and the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA). These agencies are responsible for the majority of hydrological and continuous environmental related measurements within New Zealand. It is recommended that these standards are adopted throughout New Zealand and all data collected be processed and quality coded appropriately. The degree of rigour in which the standard is applied, will depend on the quality of data sought. The document was initially prepared by Brent Watson of Horizons Regional Council and Phil White of Auckland Regional Council. The input of LAEMG members into the development of this document is gratefully acknowledged. In particular the review and editing undertaken by Martin Doyle of Tasman District Council, Jeff Watson of Horizons Regional Council. Mike Ede of Marlborough District Council and Doug Stewart of Environment Waikato have been particularly helpful in the finalising the form and content of this standard. This document was edited (non-technical) by Chris Heath of Heath Research Services. Funding The project was funded by the following organisations: Auckland Council Bay of Plenty Regional Council Contact Energy Environment Canterbury Regional Council Environment Southland Genesis Energy Greater Wellington Regional Council Hawke s Bay Regional Council Horizons Regional Council Marlborough District Council Meridian Energy Mighty River Power Review Ministry for the Environment Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment Science & Innovation Group National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA) Northland Regional Council Otago Regional Council Taranaki Regional Council Tasman District Council West Coast Regional Council Waikato Regional Council This document will be reviewed by the NEMS steering group in February 2014, and thereafter once every two years. Signatories

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Purpose & Principles...2 Framework...3 System Integration...4 Supplementary Quality Codes (Child Coding)...5 Annexes Application of the Quality Code Schema... 6 Annex A Dissolved Oxygen Recording...7 Annex B Open Channel Flow Measurement...8 Annex C Rainfall Recording...9 Annex D Soil Water Measurement... 10 Annex E Turbidity Recording... 11 Annex F Water Level Recording... 12 Annex G Water Meter Data... 13 Annex H Water Temperature Recording... 14 Page i

Page ii

Introduction It is critical that an understanding the data collection methodologies, data limitations and intended purpose of the original datasets is known by end users, now and in the future. This quality coding schema provides: the internal linkages between the organisations quality management systems and nationally developed monitoring standards. These linkages provide a potential reporting framework for organisational reporting. insight and detail for the end user of the potential issues associated with provided datasets and highlights the need to review supplementary data comments and other provided metadata associated Provision of a nationally consistent quality code schema will enable end users to consistently utilise and/or review environmental data sourced from multiple organisations. Figure 1 Quality Interactions Page 1

Purpose & Principles Purpose The purpose of this National Environmental Monitoring Standard (NEMS) is to provide a nationally consistent quality coding schema; covering a series of fundamental underlying principles of quality management: The schema shall be: understandable consistent in application, and reproducible. The schema shall: support the centralisation or federation of environmental data (National Archive) focus on environmental data quality; not Instrumentation limitations link to internal interactions with Quality Management Systems (i.e. ISO 9001:2008). form an integral part of the National Environmental Monitoring Standards (NEMS). make provision of information relating to data quality for both data collectors and the end users of the data. The national schema shall: provide a simple & understandable map of data quality be no more than ten quality steps make provision for different software be easily easy to implement by all organisation be suitable for all measured parameters, and be numerically based. With the above ideals, the schema shall be robust and make provision for: future improvements of environmental monitoring practices regional sub-codes or sub-standards of data quality historic data quality (in terms of Quality at the Time of Collection ) the development of National Environmental Monitoring Standards (NEMS) of each measured parameter, and the support of open data sharing models. The following National Environmental Monitoring Standard: National Quality Code Schema (NQCS) framework is an application of the above purpose and principles. Page 2

Framework The adoption of best practices, both nationally and internationally, highlights that NQCS must contain Zones of Quality with a numeric index that increases with improved quality. Each quality zone requires a summary of the expected quality of the environmental data coded at the zone. Missing Record is the poorest quality data because it affects both the data collectors and end users. This fact needed to be reflected by being assigning the lowest zone and code to the data. Figure 2 Generic Quality Flowchart Page 3

System Integration This NQCS provides the minimum nationally required parent coding framework for all environmental data. This schema is fixed to ensure a nationally standardised framework. The parent quality code value is the maximum value for that quality zone. Agencies that currently operate with a data quality code schema may not have the resources to modify historic data and/or in-house schemas to match the NQCS. To overcome this issue, each agency will develop a quality code map, to allow conversion of the existing operational in-house codes to the NQCS. Quality Map Each agency will produce a quality map and store this quality map within their data management documentation and provide it with environmental data provided to any external agencies. It is intended that each organisation will utilise, as closely as possible the colours used in this schema. It is recognised that different printers will produce subtly different colours, however the standardisation of colours assigned to quality codes will further assist standardisation of the Quality Coding Schema. Quality Code Colours The following colour codes are provided as a guide for use in software applications, web pages and print. Table 1 Quality Code Colours NQCS Quality Code Colour Name RGB Hex Pantone CMYK QC 100 Red 255, 0, 0 #FF0000 Pantone 186 0, 100, 81, 4 QC 200 Clay (Orange 4) 139, 90, 0 #8B5A00 Pantone 730 0 39, 76, 29 QC 300 Light Gray 211, 211, 211 #D3D3D3 0,0,0,40 QC 400 Orange 255, 165, 0 #FFA500 Pantone 138 0,42,100,1 QC 500 Deep Sky Blue 0, 191, 255 #00BFFF Process Cyan 100, 0, 0, 0 QC 600 Dark Green 0, 100, 0 #006400 Pantone 3415 100, 0, 77, 22 The text shall be black or white; whichever provides maximum contrast and readability for the medium used (screen or print). Note: The colour codes (RGB, Hex, Pantone and CMYK) are supplied to reduce the risk of colour shifts from one device or medium to another. Note: The colours displayed or printed in this document may not be an accurate representation of the colour codes because MS Word, which was used to author this document, is not capable of colour management. Page 4

Supplementary Quality Codes (Child Coding) The NQCS can be introduced in its basic parent form or it can be expanded upon to provide more data quality detail by agencies where a greater level of detail is required; detail relating to data quality and operational requirements and standards. This expansion to the NQCS is called child coding. These child codes are currently allocated in-house, however, a nationally agreed set of child codes will be developed. When developed these child codes shall form an annex to this document. The NQCS parent codes can be easily expanded upon with children codes. Table 2 below, shows how an agency can expand the QC 200 series to differentiate between data that is of known quality and data that is currently non-verified, that is, raw telemetered data). When reporting child codes externally, the National Quality Coding Schema shall be the default quality coding series. Table 2 Parent Code Expanded with Child Codes NQCS Quality Code NQCS Quality Zone Parent Child Code Child Summary No Quality or Non Verified 150 No Known Quality 200 Non Verified Example: QC 200-150 Where the NQCS is expanded upon, a clear documented structure should be produced and stored within the agencies data management documentation. This documentation will clearly detail the linkages between the NQCS parent codes and the child codes; this linkage will also be reflected in the agencies data quality map. Page 5

Annexes Application of the Quality Code Schema These annexes identify the parent quality codes associated with various National Environmental Monitoring Standards (NEMS) and outline how the NQCS should be applied to data. As further standards are developed a new version of this document will become available. Page 6

Annex A Dissolved Oxygen Recording Figure 3 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Dissolved Oxygen Data Page 7

Annex B Open Channel Flow Measurement Figure 4 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Open Channel Flow Data Page 8

Annex C Rainfall Recording Figure 5 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Rainfall Intensity Data Page 9

Annex D Soil Water Measurement Figure 6 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Soil Water Content Data Page 10

Annex E Turbidity Recording Figure 7 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Turbidity Data Page 11

Annex F Water Level Recording Figure 8 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Water level Data Page 12

Annex G Water Meter Data Figure 9 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Water Meter Data Page 13

Annex H Water Temperature Recording Figure 10 Flowchart for Assigning Quality Codes to Water Temperature Data Page 14