PHENOLOGICAL VARIATION IN HEIGHT AND DIAMETER GROWTH IN PROVENANCES AND FAMILIES OF LOBLOLLY PINE

Similar documents
Relationships Between Wood Density Components and Juvenile Height Growth and Growth Rhythm Traits for Norway Spruce Provenances and Families

Seed Orchard Management Strategies for Deployment of Intensively Selected Loblolly Pine Families in the Southern US

PERFORMANCE OF BLACK WALNUT PROVENANCES AFTER 15 YEARS IN 7 MIDWESTERN PLANTATIONS. Knud E. Clausen 1/

Genetic Selection in Coastal Douglas-fir for Tolerance to Swiss Needle Cast Disease

An Evaluation of Height as an Early Selection Criterion for Volume and Predictor of Site Index Gain in the Western Gulf

RELATION BETWEEN HEIGHT GROWTH AND FUSIFORM RUST INFECTION IN SLASH PINE 1/ A. E. Squillace, P. A. Layton, and R. E. Goddard

ROOT GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE SEEDLINGS HELD IN COLD STORAGE UNDER DIFFERING MOISTURE TREATMENTS

14 Year Results of the PMRC Species Comparison Study

FIVE YEAR GROWTH RESULTS OF WATER OAK (QUERCUS NIGRA L.) PROVENANCE. J.C. Adams 1/

Optimal Method For Analysis Of Disconnected Diallel Tests. Bin Xiang and Bailian Li

THE EFFECT OF SEED ORIGIN ON SEED WING MORPHOLOGY AND JUVENILE GROWTH OF EAST TEXAS GREEN ASH. R.A. Woessner and Van Hicks, Jr.

FLOWERING RESPONSE OF JUVENILE SELECTIONS IN LOBLOLLY PINE. L. C. Burris, C. G. Williams and S. D. Douglass 1/

ASSESSING POTENTIAL GENETIC GAINS FROM VARIETAL PLANTING STOCK IN LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS

Crown Ratio and Relative Spacing Relationships for Loblolly Pine Plantations

G.S. Foster 1/ and D.V. Shaw 2/

PMRC COASTAL PLAIN CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 6 ANALYSIS

PMRC SAGS CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 4 ANALYSIS

The Impact and Value of Tree Improvement in the South

PMRC CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 2 ANALYSIS

NATURAL VARIATION IN ROOTING ABILITY OF WESTERN PROVENANCES OF SHORTLEAF PINE. G. A. Fancher and C. G. Tauer1/

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH NORTH AMERICAN FOREST BIOLOGY WORKSHOP

RELATIONSHIP OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND TRACHEID LENGTH TO GROWTH RATE AND PROVENANCE IN SCOTCH PINE. Donald Dorn 1/ INTRODUCTION

GENETIC VARIATION IN SURVIVAL OF LONGLEAF PINE. R. E. Goddard and Richard Bryant 1/

RESULTS OF THE SOUTHWIDE PINE SEED SOURCE STUDY THROUGH Wells 1/

CHERRY PROGENY TESTS 1 /

ESTIMATING VOLUME POTENTIAL IN GENETIC TESTS USING GROWTH AND YIELD MODELS. Warren L. Nance and Osborn O. Wells 1/

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION OF SWEETGUM. Jerry Sprague and Robert J. Weir 1/

DORMANCY AND COLD-HARDINESS OF CONTAINERZIED LOBLOLLY PINE SEEDLINGsli. John G. Mexal and William C. Carlso~

SITE INDEX MODELS FOR HEIGHT GROWTH OF PLANTED LOBLOLLY PINE (Pinus taeda L.) SEED SOURCES. Warren L. Nance and Osborn O. Wells 1/

JUVENILE GROWTH PERFORMANCE IN A PROVENANCE TEST OF SWEETGUM. by Kim C. Steiner, Bruce Bongarten, and Randall J. Rousseau'

LOBLOLLY PINE IMPROVED PLANTING STOCK-VEGETATION CONTROL STUDY - RESULTS AT AGE 6. Plantation Management Research Cooperative

Fall Acclimation and the Lift/Store Pathway: Effect on Reforestation

RESISTANCE OF SHORTLEAF X LOBLOLLY PINE HYBRIDS TO INOCULATION WITH FUSIFORM RUST. Timothy La Farge and John F. Kraus

EFFECTS OF GENETICALLY IMPROVED STANDS ON GROWTH AND YIELD PRINCIPLES. P. T. Sprinz 1/

EARLY LOBLOLLY PINE CONE COLLECTION IN A SOUTH CAROLINA SEED ORCHARD. T. D. Astriab and R. E. Schoenike1/

Adaptation of the Timing of Bud Burst of Norway Spruce to Temperate and Boreal Climates

LOBLOLLY PINE IMPROVED PLANTING STOCK-VEGETATION CONTROL STUDY-AGE 15 RESULTS

SAGS CULTURE/DENSITY STUDY: RESULTS THROUGH AGE 10

Early frost damage on Sitka spruce seedlings and the influence of phosphorus nutrition

PMRC SAGS CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 6 ANALYSIS

GROWTH COMPARISONS OF TAMARACK AND EUROPEAN LARCH IN UPPER MICHIGAN. David D. Reed, Robert L. Sajdak, and John Kotar

Growth of Chemically Root-Pruned Seedlings in the Greenhouse and the Field'

PREDICTING THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TREE IMPROVEMENT ON STAND YIELD. Marilyn A. Buford 1

Dynamics of Branch and Stem Apical Growth in the Progenies of Plus Pine Trees (Pinus sylvestris L.)

STIMULATION OF FLOWERING IN SWEETGUM. J.B. Jett and George Finger 1/

Seasonal Growth Patterns of Blue and Valley Oak Seedlings Established on Foothill Rangelands 1

U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER FPL 124 OCTOBER 1969 SAPWOOD THICKNESS. of douglas-fir and five other western softwoods

Effects of Nursery Characteristics on Field Survival and Growth of Loblolly Pine Rooted Cuttings

CURRICULUM VITAE RAFAEL RUBILAR PONS Ph.D. Graduate Student in Forestry/ M.S. Graduate Student in Statistics North Carolina State University

BENEFITS OF LOBLOLLY PINE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR THE UPPER COASTAL PLAIN OF MISSISSIPPI

MOISTURE STRESS CONDITIONING OF CONTAINERIZED LOBLOLLY PINE. John R. Seiler and Jon D. Johnson 1/

Genetic Variation in Needle Characteristics of Slash Pine and in some of its Hybrids l )

COMPARISON OF THE GROWTH OF VEGETATIVE PROPAGULES AND SEEDLINGS OF PINUS RADIATA

SLASH PINE SITE PREPARATION STUDY: AGE 23 RESULTS

CHAPTER V. Root growth potential as a function of soil density and water content for four forest soils

Family variation of biomass and root/shoot ratio in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.)

Seed and Seedling Size Grading of Slash Pine Has Little Effect on Long-Term Growth of Trees

VARIATION AMONG PROGENY OF MASS-SELECTED BALSAM FIR1

Introduction to Growth and Yield Models

A review of a successful seed orchard at Cherrylane

EASTERN WHITE PINE SEED SOURCE VARIATION IN A NORTHERN MINNESOTA PLANTING. R. M. Jeffers 1 ABSTRACT

THE TIMBER SUPPLY SITUATION IN THE SOUTHEAST: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTENSIVE MANAGEMENT.

STABILITY OF FIELD RESISTANT SLASH PINE TO SELECTED ISOLATES OF FUSIFORM RUST FUNGUS. Calvin F. Bey and Charles H. Walkinshaw1 /

a better christmas tree great lakes christmas tree journal

FROM PROGENY TESTING TO SEED ORCHARD THROUGH MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING. Fan H. Kung, Calvin F. Bey and Theodore H. Mattheiss

Proposed Seed Collection Zones for the Central States

UNIFORM SEEDLING DENSITY IS IMPORTANT IN HARDWOOD PROGENY TEST NURSERIES. Charles D. Webb'

Geographie Variation in Virginia Pine

PREDICTING DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT FROM TOTAL HEIGHT AND CROWN LENGTH

Farm Woodland Forum Annual Meeting, May , Organic Research Centre, Newbury

Swedish programme for conifer conservation and breeding

ABSTRACT. Seven seed sources, 140 families, of first-generation plantation selections of loblolly pine

Selection and Propagation of Highly Graft-Compatible Douglas-fir Rootstocks A Case History

Dwight K. Lauer and Harold E. Quicke 1

Effect of Drupe size and Earliness of Germination on Root growth potential of Teak (Tectona grandis linn.f.) Seedlings

Genetically Improved Pines for Reforesting Florida s Timberlands 1

ROOTING OF MATURE AMERICAN SYCAMORE CUTTINGS. G. Sam Foster and Eyvind Thor¹ /

MS33 THINNING STUDY: NINE-YEAR POST THINNING ANALYSIS

EFFECTS OF CONTAINER SIZE ON WHITE PINE AND DOUGLAS-FIR. SURVIVAL AND GROWTH IN NORTH IDAHO --Daniel L. Miller and Richard M.

B. Zobel, R. L. McElwee, and Cicely Browne School of Forestry North Carolina State College

Ortet Age and Clonal Effects on Growth and Market Value of Fraser Fir (Abies fraseri) Grafts as Christmas Trees

Barry New. Branch, NCDFR

LIFTING FOREST TREE NURSERY CROPS--AN OVERVIEW. John C. Brissette/ 1

EVALUATION OF SEED PRODUCTION BY CONE ANALYSIS. R. P. Karrfalt and E. W. Belcher 1/ ABSTRACT

Slash, Loblolly, and Shortleaf Pine in a Mixed Stand; A Comparison of Their Wood Properties

FII Contract Number: R Annual Operational Report (2002/2003) April 10, Prepared by: University of Northern British Columbia

WHITE PINE GROWTH AND YIELD ON A MINED SITE IN VIRGINIA: RESPONSE TO THINNING AND PRUNING 1

COMPARING DIAMETER GROWTH OF STANDS PRIOR TO CANOPY CLOSURE TO DIAMETER GROWTH OF STANDS AFTER CANOPY CLOSURE

The Future for Pine Plantation Silviculture in the SE U.S.

Precision forestry in Finland

TESTING SLASH PINE FOR RUST RESISTANCE IN ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL CONDITIONS. Ronald J. Dinus

Pinus nigra Provenance Variation and Selection in New Zealand

Field results from a provenance trial of Pinus strobus L. in Australia

SEASONAL FROST-TOLERANCE OF PINUS RADIATA, PINUS MURICATA, AND PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII

Growth Response and Economics of Herbaceous Weed Control in Loblolly Pine Stand Management. 29 May 2008

PMRC COASTAL PLAIN CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 12 ANALYSIS

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY LOBLOLLY AND SLASH PINE ROOTED CUTTING PROGRAM. Annual Progress Report December 2, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Forest Tree Breeding and Challenges

Forest tree breeding and Gene conservation in Denmark

Control-Pollination of Fraser Fir

Transcription:

PHENOLOGICAL VARIATION IN HEIGHT AND DIAMETER GROWTH IN PROVENANCES AND FAMILIES OF LOBLOLLY PINE K.J.S. Jayawickrama', McKeand, S.E 2. and Jett, J.B 3. Abstract. We present results on the phenology of eight openpollinated families from each of four different provenances in a trial (on two locations) in southwest Georgia. The provenances are: Atlantic Coastal Plain, Gulf Hammock (FL), Lower Gulf Coast and Upper Gulf Coast. The trees were measured from summer to fall in 1993 and 1994 when the trees were in their fifth and sixth growing seasons. There was little difference between provenances as to when height growth started in spring, but there were very significant differences for the date of cessation of growth in fall. The fast growing Gulf Hammock provenance grew the longest (till the end of August) while the slowest growing Upper Gulf source was first to stop growing (early August). Provenances were also different for the date of cessation of diameter growth, and the order of cessation was the same as for height. Families within provenances were different for date of cessation of both height and diameter growth. Keywords: Pinus taeda L., height growth phenology, diameter growth phenology. INTRODUCTION There is evidence that phenology of height growth in conifers is under strong genetic control (Hanover 1963, Li and Adams 1993, Mergen et. al. 1964). Diameter growth phenology of Douglas-fir is also moderately heritable (Li and Adams 1994). With regards to loblolly pine, southern sources appeared to have a longer growing season than northern sources (Perry et al. 1966). Height and diameter growth phenology appear to affect cold-hardiness, growth rate (Bridgwater 1990) and possibly wood properties. This paper presents phenology data from a study established to determine how wood properties are affected by the timing of the initiation and cessation of height and diameter growth of juvenile loblolly pine. Stud y Trees MATERIALS AND METHODS The Early Selection Verification Study of the NCSU-Industry Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, planted in 1989, was used for this research. Details of the study are given in McKeand and Bridgwater (1993) and McKeand and Jett (1993). In the spring of 1991 and the summer of 1992, the two plantings in southwest Georgia (at Cedar Springs, by Georgia Pacific 1 Graduate Research Assistant and 2 Professor, Department of Forestry, 3 Associate Dean, College of Forest Resources; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8002. 33

Corporation or G-P; and Bainbridge, by International Paper Company or IPCo) were thinned as follows: - From each of the four provenances (Atlantic Coastal - ACP, Gulf Hammock - GH, Lower Gulf - LG, and Upper Gulf - UG), the tallest 4 families and the shortest 4 families were left, giving 32 families in all. - About 10 trees were left per family per location as evenly spaced as possible. - This left about 320 trees per location, 640 total. Growth Phenoloqy Total height was measured in February 1993 (the beginning of the growing season). In 1993, total height was measured every two weeks from mid-june till growth stopped in late October. In the spring of 1994, flushing of the trees was observed. Following budbreak, height was measured in May, June and then every three weeks from late July to early October. To accurately measure height, a height pole was placed near each tree and the tip observed from a bucket truck with the aid of 15- to 20-X binoculars. The height pole was placed on a stake driven in the ground next to each tree, minimizing variation in placing the pole. Dendrometer bands were installed on each tree, in the middle of the first flush originating in the trees' second growing season. In 1993, diameter growth was measured at the same time as height, and also once in November and once in December. In 1994, in addition to occasions when height was measured, weekly measurements were taken from July to the end of September, and also once in October, November and December. Cessation of growth for a given tree (for both height and diameter) was defined as the Julian day when the tree completed 95% of growth for the season. Analysis of variance was conducted using the GLM procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc. 1990). Approximate F-tests were constructed for certain terms (Satterthwaite 1946). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Budbreak and flushing for all the trees took place within a very short period (about a week) in the spring of 1994. Thus it was not possible to observe differences between provenances and families for the date of initiation of height growth. This contrasts with results for Douglas-fir where there were significant differences in date of bud-break (Li and Adams 1993). Our results may perhaps be attributable to the mild climatic conditions prevalent at the two sites. Provenances were significantly different for all three traits analyzed (Table 1). Averaged over both years, the Gulf Hammock (north Florida) provenance finished 95% of the season's height growth 20 days later than the Upper Gulf Coast provenance. The difference was about the same for diameter growth in 1994. Total height is plotted for provenance means, by site, for 1994 (Figure 1) showing GH to continue growing longer in the fall and UG slowing down relatively early. Tests planted by the NCSU-ICTIP have shown the GH source to be consistently fast in growth. Provenance variation in height growth phenology has been reported previously (Hanover 1963, Perry et al. 1966). Families within provenances were significantly different for the length of growing season. For height growth averaged over both years, the range was from 247.9 days (family 22-29, GH) to 211.8 (8-503, UG) (Table 2). The longest season for diameter growth also was from GH (22-27, 302.6 days) and the shortest from UG (8-526, 276 days). Annual height increment was 34

significant at the 10 % level (p=0.0516). Thus provenances and families which continued height growth longer tended to continue diameter growth longer as well. Diameter growth continued about two months longer than height growth, which implies that if latewood begins to be formed after cessation of height growth (eg. Larson 1969), all four provenances have about the same period for latewood formation. Families which grew most in height tended to have longer growing seasons, and the family which grew least in height was the first to reach 95e of the season's diameter growth. With respect to differences between years, height growth seemed to slow down earlier in 1994 than in 1993 (about 10 days) although on average the trees grew about 40 cm. more in 1994. 1994 was a very wet summer while there was a pronounced dry spell in July-August 1993. The fact that the trees were one year older may have contributed to the earlier transition although it was probably not the only factor. Most of the second and third order interactions were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Differences in the length of the growing season explained part of the difference in growth rate among provenances of loblolly pine, with fastergrowing provenances tending to grow longer in the fall. Cessation of diameter growth took place in the same order as for height growth, and occurred about two months later. In continuation we are evaluating wood samples from this study to see how variation in height and diameter growth phenology affect wood formation, especially the proportion of latewood. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was funded by a grant from Georgia-Pacific Corporation, an assistantship awarded to KJ from the Department of Forestry, NCSU, and support from the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service. Georgia- Pacific Corp. and International Paper Company each planted and maintained one of the sites. Chris Hunt, Paula Otto, Kevin Harding and Judith Jayawickrama helped in the field measurements. LITERATURE CITED Bridgwater, F.E. 1990. Shoot elongation patterns of loblolly pine families selected for contrasting growth potential. For. Sci. 36:641-656. Hanover, J.W. 1963. Geographic variation in ponderosa pine leader growth. For. Sci. 9(1):86-95. Larson, P.R. 1969. Wood formation and the concept of wood quality. Bulletin No. 74, Yale University, New Haven, CT. Li, P. and Adams, W.T. 1994. Genetic variation in cambial phenology of coastal Douglas-fir. Can.J.For.Res. 24:1864-1870. Li, P. and Adams, W.T. 1993. Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir. Can.J.For.Res. 23: 1043-1051. 35

McKeand, S.E. and Bridgwater, F.E. 1993. Provenance and family variation for juvenile growth characteristics of Pinus taeda L. and the impact on early selection for growth. Studia Forestalia Suecica. 191: 5-10. McKeand, S.E. and Jett, J.B. 1993. Growth and stem sinuosity of diverse provenances of three-year-old loblolly pine. p. 208-213 In: Proc. 22nd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, June 14-17, 1993, Atlanta, GA. Mergen, F., Burley, J. and Yeatman, C.W. 1964. Variation in growth characteristics and wood properties of Norway spruce. Tappi 47(8):499-504. Perry, T.O., W. Chi-Wu and D. Schmitt. 1966. Height growth for loblolly pine provenances in relation to photoperiod and growing season. Silvae Genetica 15:61-64. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition. Cary, NC. Satterthwaite, F.E. 1946. An approximate distribution of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin 2:110-114. 36

Table 1. Analysis of variance for three traits: Height increment and Julian days to complete 95% of season's height growth (for 1993 and 1994) and Julian days to complete 95% of season's diameter growth (for 1994) Annual Height increment (cm) Julian Days to complete 95% of season's height growth Source DF Prob>F Location 1 0.3632 0.2884 Block(location) 32 0.0001 0.0571 Year 1 0.1729 0.0126 Provenance 3 0.0137 <0.0001 Family(Provenance) 28 0.0516 0.0005 Year*Provenance 3 0.2797 0.8071 Year*Location 1 0.0018 0.4665 Year*Family(provenance) 28 0.2552 0.6456 Location*Provenance 3 0.2902 0.4546 Location*Family(Prov.) 28 0.5407 0.4682 Location*Year*Prov. 3 0.6856 0.5332 Location*Year* 28 0.0174 0.7370 Family(Provenance) Error 1144 Source DF Prob>F Location 1.1238 Block(location) 32.0001 Provenance 3.0072 Family(Provenance) 28.0003 Location*Provenance 3.0001 Location*Family(Prov.) 28.6248 Error 626 Julian days to complete 95% of season's diameter growth 37

Table 2. Least squares means for 1. Annual height increment in cm. 2. Number of Julian days to complete 95% of season's height growth and 3. No. of Julian days to complete 95% of season's diameter growth. Means for year, location, provenance and family(provenance). Traits 1 and 2 for 1993 and 1994, trait 3 for 1994 only Height Increment Days (Height) Days (Diameter) Location GS 125.01 228.18 291.33 IP 143.22 229.9 286.88 Year 93 113.34 234.21 94 154.89 223.87 Provenance ACP 142.84 233.07 290.89 GH 138.52 240.1 299.42 IC 126.34 218.68 279.14 LG 128.76 224.32 286.98 Family Proven. 5063 ACP 148.01 226.98 289.13 5065 ACP 135.63 232.51 288.04 7002 ACP 152.19 236.58 292.71 7004 ACP 138.27 226.78 293.49 7034 ACP 143.04 229.38 292.55 7056 ACP 149.8 236.04 297.25 7058 ACP 142.22 236.25 286.35 11009 ACP 133.57 240.04 287.56 22001 GH 135.19 241.59 302.15 22004 GH 134.81 240 299 22027 GH 137.96 241.83 302.57 22029 GH 149.4 247.87 299.42 22030 GH 140.27 244.56 300.7 22031 GH 137.09 232.23 295.91 22032 GH 135.87 237.99 296.24 22034 GH 137.55 234.74 299.36 8503 UG 131.11 211.79 277.79 8509 UG 124.8 221.94 281.56 8526 UG 123.87 212.01 276.02 12008 UG 141.53 227.99 283.19 17016 UG 126.94 215.38 283.92 17044 UG 134.12 229.89 283.53 19002 UG 111.66 214.83 270.6 19016 UG 116.71 215.58 276.47 17004 LG 123.35 218.2 277.95 17019 LG 114.56 229.58 286.27 23026 LG 129.22 219.9 284.08 23028 LG 133.41 221.4 287.2 24001 LG 137.54 223.69 291.85 24002 LG 135.08 228.67 291.05 24004 LG 127.04 220.06 289.49 24009 LG 129.89 233.08 287.98 38

880 830 International Paper 780 -E 0 --- 4 _c -' 730 L m ai 1 680-630... ACP.- 4 - GH -)K-UG LG 580 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Julian Day 890 Georgia-Pacific 840 E 0 ---- 790 4-, _c ACP ± GH * UG - - c LG 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Julian Day Figure 1. Total height by provenance, by site, during the 1994 growth season. (ACP = Atlantic Coastal, GH = Gulf Hammock, UG = Upper Gulf, LG = Lower Gulf). 39