Farming Challenges and Opportunities

Similar documents
MANAGING PHOSPHORUS LOSSES. Rich. McDowell, AgResearch

Farm Environment Plan

Farm Environment Plan

Wintering in Southland and South Otago

Contents. Page 2 of 16

Assessment Schedule 2013 Agricultural and Horticultural Science: Analyse a New Zealand primary production environmental issue (91532)

Environmental Farm Plan for Buscot Station

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

Farm Environment Plan for Willowburn Station

Climate change mitigation measures: Water quality benefits and costs

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT of RUNOFF. Sarah A. White, Ph.D. 27 July 2017

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

phosphorus in catchments

Environmental Farm Plan for Irrigated Land Use

Contact for service: Lindsay Fung Deer Industry New Zealand P O Box Wellington Phone:

Streamside Management. How the area around your pond effects the water.

2017 Agricultural Water Quality Workshop

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

CHECKLIST FORM FOR ASSESSING GRAZING OPERATIONS

Programs to Resolve Agricultural Water Quality Issues the Kiwi Perspective. Tom Cochrane University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Water Quality in the Waihopai Catchment

activities and water quality in the Bog Ross Monaghan AgResearch, Invermay

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

Hurunui-Waiau Nutrient Budgeting Case Studies

Rural Land Program. A guide to reducing the impact of runoff to waterways

ORC PLAN CHANGE 6A Overview & Update. Kim Reilly, Federated Farmers Regional Policy Manager, South Island

JANUARY Notes. Nutrient Management Tips

Controlling runon and runoff:

1 General questions on zone and catchment management plans

How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?

THE TUKITUKI PLAN. What you need to know about water quantity and water quality

More than just a number Your guide to improving nitrogen-use efficiency on your farm

Evaluation of Constructed Wetlands as Mitigation Options for Phosphorus and Sediment within UK Agriculture

Healthy Rivers Your rivers, your plan Wai Ora O awa, to mahere PROPOSED WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN CHANGE 1

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. Sarah A. White, Ph.D. 25 Oct 2016

Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients

Dairyshed Effluent and Stream Crossing Survey 2013/2014

Some External Costs of Dairy Farming in Canterbury. Peter Tait and Ross Cullen, Economics Group, Lincoln University, New Zealand

WDNR - Using Snap-Plus to Quantify Phosphorus Trading Credits ( )

Key Strategic Goal Of the MVCA

Watershed BMPs. Notes from NRCS online site on BMPs. Focus on key BMPs

FARM ENVIRONMENT PLAN

PINEY RUN WATERSHED 2005 PROFILE

MURPHY DRAIN CATCHMENT

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

Equine B.M.P. s By Kelly Riley Wayne Soil & Water Conservation District 428 W. Liberty St. Wooster, Oh Holmes SWCD

Canterbury Arable Farms

Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

NJDEP Regulations that impact or soon will impact agricultural operations. April 1, 2007 Horses 2007

Exemplar for Internal Achievement Standard. Agricultural and Horticultural Science Level 2

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

Stormwater BMP Maintenance

MINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER. Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District

orking Trees for Water Quality

Concerns about ranching and

Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

3/22/2012. Hydrologically connected? Conducting a Water Quality Self-Assessment. for Napa River & Sonoma Creek Watersheds RANCH WATER QUALITY PLANNING

Agricultural Phosphorus Management: Protecting Production and Water Quality

Impact of the Glastir Scheme:

Understanding Agriculture And Clean Water

Waterways Local Update

When the Poo Hits the Ground!

Gray s Creek. Gray s Creek

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

LAND AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN GUIDELINES

From the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations

Beef Cattle and Environmental Stewardship

Dairyshed Effluent and Stream Crossing Survey 2016/2017. Technical Report No: July 2017

Soil and Water Sustainability Program Guidelines Version 2.0

Water Quality Conditions & Management on Rangelands

Smarter Water Catchments

PLANNING ASSESSMENT SHEET: FARMING ACTIVITY IN HINDS/HEKEAO CATCHMENT

Stream Buffer: Kidneys of the Watershed?

Role of Soils in Water Quality. Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources

Water Quality Preservation Effect of Riparian Forests in Watersheds with Dairy Farming Areas in Eastern Hokkaido

Growing Greener Watershed Protection and AMD Set-Aside Goals and Accomplishments Worksheets

Principles from the P21 research programme into lower N input dairy systems. Mark Shepherd AgResearch, Ruakura

Feedlots and intensive winter grazing

Menu. Practices to improve water quality. Cropping land

Irrigation Field Day

Waterways Local Update

Agricultural practices that reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) and generate co-benefits

Agricultural Improvement Fund

Water Pollution. Chapter 20

Edge-of-Field Monitoring

Waterways Local Update

BEEF CATTLE FEEDLOTS: WASTE MANAGEMENT AND UTILISATION

BEFORE THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONERS. IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act of submissions under clause 6 First Schedule.

Re-plumbing Roadside Ditch Networks

Modeling the Influence of Agricultural Practices on Watershed Export of Phosphorus

Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed

Appendix 11. Erosion and Sediment Control Management Plan. Appendix 11

Modeling Sediment and Nutrient Loads Input to Great Lakes and Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

Targeting Best Management in Contrasting Watersheds

Transcription:

RURAL Farming Challenges and Opportunities Managing water and nutrient at the farm and paddock scale Roger MacGibbon National Technical Director Opus Rural November 2016

Opus Rural Our Rural team comprises farm systems advisors, rural finance experts, engineers, scientists, planners and project managers and we provide an independent, technically-focussed service in the following areas: Land and water management: Farm Environment Plans, soil testing, riparian and wetland design and installation Farm infrastructure and engineering: culverts, bridges, feedlots, underpasses, effluent systems, farm conversions Rural planning: resource consents and planning advice Irrigation system design On-farm technical risk assessments and management plans: effluent, water and nutrient management; property purchase due diligence We provide an objective, impartial technical service We are rurally based with 16 local offices with rural staff throughout NZ

RURAL Managing Phosphorus, Sediment and Faecal Pathogens on New Zealand Farms

Principles of nutrient, sediment and faecal pathogen movement on farms RURAL Understanding water movement on your farm is most critical because water is the transport mechanism for most nutrients, sediment and faecal pathogens across the farm and into waterways. Nutrient loss is greatest where and when the volume and speed of water flow is greatest. Two routes for water flow: 1. Across the surface = surface runoff. This is the principal transport mechanism for phosphorus, sediment and pathogens 2. Down through the soil = leaching. This is the principal transport mechanism for nitrogen.

Principles of nutrient, sediment and faecal pathogen movement on farms RURAL Once nitrate descends below the root zone there are very few additional opportunities to intercept and extract it. Phosphorus, sediment and faecal bacteria can be intercepted and extracted anywhere where runoff can be trapped and stored for a period. There are two situations where leached nitrate can be intercepted for a second hit: - Springs and seeps - Sub-surface drainage

Phosphorus sources (how does P get on to the farm?) RURAL P fertiliser Livestock manure Attached to sediment from upstream/upcatchment Transported by water

What are the causes of P loss? RURAL High P source potential + High P transport potential = CRITICAL SOURCE AREA (CSA) Typically, 80% of the P losses come from 20% of the farm area Concentrating P management effort on Critical Source Areas is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy

What are the causes of P loss? RURAL P loss is greatest when: soil P levels are high surface water runoff is most likely soils are saturated soil/ sediment is exposed Where there is sediment erosion there will be P loss Sediment and faecal pathogen loss is also greatest under the same conditions.

Livestock management Exclude cattle from all permanent waterways. Cattle in streams are a major cause of P and faecal contamination RURAL

Livestock management RURAL Exclude cattle from all permanent waterways. Cattle in streams are a major cause of P and faecal contamination 15th of March, 2016 Site name Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus (mg/l) E-Coli (cfu/100ml) Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/l) Ammoniacal Nitrogen (mg/l) Schedule 15 limit at flows less than median 0.100 0.026 260 0.444 Nth Branch at SH90 0.026 0.028 2500 0.420 Sth Branch Black Gully Rd East (2) 0.016 0.049 470 0.260 Nth Branch at Fleming Rd (1) 0.025 0.03 3100 0.660 Nth Branch at Fleming Rd (2) 0.066 0.2 8000 0.530 Sth Branch Black Gully Rd East (1) 0.012 0.032 6900 0.230 Nth Branch at Cabbage Tree Rd West (1) 0.067 0.17 6000 1.400 Nth Branch at Cabbage Tree Rd West (2) 0.074 0.21 8800 2.400 Nth Branch at Black Gully Rd West (1) 0.015 0.14 4700 1.600 Nth Branch at Black Gully Rd West (2) 0.310 0.49 33000 7.300 Sth Branch at Mill Rd 0.012 0.038 970 0.820 Nth Branch at Walker Rd West 0.016 0.16 5700 1.300 Sth Branch at Walker Rd East 0.010 0.039 3200 0.092 Gibson Rd 0.014 0.067 5100 0.460 Wooded Hill Rd 0.011 0.046 950 0.440 Red Cells indicate levels are above the limit Median Flow at reference site (m3/s or cumecs) 15.48 Flow on day of sampling (m3/s or cumecs) 5.6 Below median

Livestock management Fence cattle out of areas that are wet for all or most of the year eg. seeps, drainage gullies, to avoid pugging and compaction

Livestock management Put a hotwire around seasonally wet seeps

Livestock management Hold stock in feedlots or standoff areas to avoid damage to pasture BUT the drainage water must be contained and managed/treated (eg. sediment retention devices, retention bunds)

RURAL Feed / pasture management

Drainage RURAL Farm tracks and races

Drainage RURAL Manage runoff from tracks so that it does not run directly to waterways. Use cut-outs to draw water off track and swales or sediment detention ponds to intercept and settle out dung and sediment

Drainage managing water movement RURAL

Drainage RURAL Sediment retention traps

Drainage RURAL Sediment retention traps

Sub-surface drainage Install subsurface drainage to reduce period of soil saturation BUT the drained water must be captured and treated (sediment retention pond for P and sediment; wetland for N and faecal)

Sub-surface drainage Release subsurface drainage into wetlands not directly into streams

Waterways RURAL Fence all cattle from waterways

Riparian buffers / filters what do they do? Riparian filter strips and planted margins do very little for N management Riparian planting can reduce P and sediment loss but only at points where runoff enters streams Trees and shrubs are not good filters of surface runoff

Waterways Establish riparian filter/buffer strips in areas where water converges (this may not be along the margins of a stream) Source: R McDowell AgResearch

Management of faecal pathogen contamination of water ways RURAL Faecal bacteria and viruses are killed by UV light. The longer the exposure to sunlight the higher the mortality. 90% + mortality of faecal pathogens can be achieved by passing drainage water through a shallow wetland.

Constructed wetlands Can extract up to 60-70% of nitrate and total nitrogen if the wetland size is between 2 and 3% of the catchment size and water residence time is at least one day. Phosphorus and sediment removal is usually less than nitrogen but can be enhanced with construction of retention ponds upstream of the wetland.

Surface flow restored and constructed wetlands

Surface flow wetlands

Surface flow wetlands

Surface flow wetlands Owl Farm Cambridge Once fully functional this 0.4 ha wetland could reduce the overall farm leaching rate from the current level of 34 kg N/ha/yr to 28 kg N/ha/yr

Surface flow wetlands Owl Farm Cambridge Once fully functional this 0.4 ha wetland could reduce the overall farm leaching rate from the current level of 44 kg N/ha/yr to 38 kg N/ha/yr

Seepage wetlands

Interpreting water quality data RURAL What do these figures mean? 1st of March, 2016 Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus (mg/l) E-Coli (cfu/100ml) Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/l) Site name Ammoniacal Nitrogen (mg/l) Schedule 15 limit at flows less than median 0.100 0.026 260 0.444 Nth Branch at SH90 0.025 0.013 370 0.460 Sth Branch Black Gully Rd East (2) 0.010 0.035 450 0.220 Nth Branch at Fleming Rd (1) 0.009 0.017 930 0.790 Nth Branch at Fleming Rd (2) 0.033 0.083 210 0.430 Sth Branch Black Gully Rd East (1) 0.029 0.021 560 0.500 Nth Branch at Cabbage Tree Rd West (1) 0.017 0.023 240 1.300 Nth Branch at Cabbage Tree Rd West (2) 0.031 0.11 590 0.630 Nth Branch at Black Gully Rd West (1) 0.010 0.039 410 1.000 Nth Branch at Black Gully Rd West (2) 0.050 0.11 250 0.520 Sth Branch at Mill Rd 0.024 0.018 300 0.190 Nth Branch at Walker Rd West 0.013 0.036 460 0.770 Sth Branch at Walker Rd East 0.005 0.026 18 0.180 Gibson Rd 0.013 0.041 850 0.450 Wooded Hill Rd 0.009 0.038 330 0.660 Red Cells indicate levels are above the limit Median Flow at reference site (m3/s or cumecs) 15.48 Flow on day of sampling (m3/s or cumecs) 7.45 Below median

Interpreting water quality data RURAL Understanding the baseline

Interpreting water quality data RURAL Understanding the baseline South Branch Black Gully Road East (2) - average readings 29 Oct 2015-30 May 2016 Ammoniacal Nitrogen (mg/l) Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus (mg/l) E-Coli (cfu/100ml) Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/l) Site name Schedule 15 limit at flows less than median 0.100 0.026 260 0.444 Average (over 16 samples periods) 0.015 0.040 287 0.391 High reading 0.120 0.130 2500 4.800 Low reading 0.005 0.020 3 0.055 Red Cells indicate levels are above the limit

Interpreting water quality data RURAL Suggested improvements in water quality data collection and use Establish a real baseline sample location that is outside the influence of farming Measure Total Phosphorus as a measure of P and sediment loss via runoff Set up one or more weather stations to help interpret the data Take measurements from drains and tributaries on farm to better understand problem areas and sources If a stream flows through your farm, measure water quality where it enters the property and where it leaves the property to better understand the effect of your faming practices.

Nutrient, sediment and faecal pathogen movement on farms RURAL Some take home messages: There are many actions on most farms that can significantly reduce nutrient losses at little or no net cost. The best recipe to reduce nutrient loss will be different for each farm. Soils and hydrology: Farmers who develop an understanding of how (and when) water and nutrients move across the farm surface and through the soil profile will be in the best position to make the best and most cost-effective decisions about the actions to take to reduce nutrient loss. Don t commit to expensive nutrient management practices until you fully understand the sources, causes and transport modes of nutrients on your farm.

Nutrient, sediment and faecal pathogen movement on farms RURAL Some take home messages: There are no magic solutions or generic cure-alls that will manage all nutrient, bacterial and sediment problems. Eg. standard riparian margin planting may do nothing to reduce nitrate loss Determine the priority problems that need management and then select the practices that will best mitigate the type, nature and source of the problems on your farm. Apply the 80:20 rule. Don t waste money on practices that can t address the priority problems on your farm. The requirements to become compliant with the rules may be different to those necessary to reduce the environmental footprint of your farm.

RURAL Thank you Contact details: Roger MacGibbon National Technical Director Opus Rural Mobile: 027 496 1365 Email: roger.macgibbon@opus.co.nz