Producing low protein malting barley. Richie Hackett Oak Park

Similar documents
Potential for cover crops in Northern Ireland. Shay Phelan Teagasc Crops Specialist Oak Park Carlow

Using Soil Tests for Soil Fertility Management

Nitrogen management in barley

germinal.com Catch Crops The benefits, management and their role in compliance

CROPS COSTS AND RETURNS 2018

NUTRIENT BUDGETING AND MANAGEMENT ON ORGANIC FARMS

SPRING BARLEY AGRONOMY

Barley should I grow malt or feed?

NITROGEN (N) MANAGEMENT: DO BARLEY VARIETIES RESPOND DIFFERENTLY TO N?

Dealing with sown pasture run-down

Dealing with sown pasture run-down

Red Clover an ideal tillage crop? Dan Clavin, Organic Specialist, Teagasc Athenry

Agronomic Insight 8 August 2017

Nitrogen Fertiliser- weighing up risk and return

International Research and Development. Designing a Crop Rotation Plan with Farmers

Teagasc Crops Forum Shay Phelan 07/9/2016

Crop Nutrition Key Points:

Maize Agronomy 2015 Teagasc UCD Maize Seminars 2015 Tim O Donovan & Dr. Richard Hackett Teagasc

ORGANIC FIELD CROPS OVERVIEW. Farm production 1 (per cent) Cereals 97% 133,000. Forages 64% 81,000. Pulses 63% 19,000.

Maintaining profitability in retained stubble systems on upper Eyre Peninsula

The Potash Development Association Forage Maize Fertiliser Requirements

ND and MT Pea Research Survey Results

Management strategies for improved productivity and reduced nitrous oxide emissions

An introduction to cover cropping. Tim Martyn

Is there potential value in more precise broadacre cropping system management? Brett Whelan

EARLY SOWING OF WHEAT

Disrupting Precision Agriculture: Making VRF Simpler.

Early sowing of Wheat

Cover crops. Commercial growing of cover crop species. Paul Brown -- Kings

Elaine Leavy Teagasc Organic Adviser, Stephen Nolan Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme Athenry

STUDY ON AGRONOMICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DOMINANT CROPPING PATTERNS IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF BARISAL DISTRICT. Abstract

Review of Ireland s Nitrates Action Programme

Green manures implications of economic and environmental benefits on rotational management

Lennox Alternative Wheat Interim grower notes 2013/14 (Autumn sown)

Cover and Catch Crops. Tim Martyn

Calibre BMR Forage Sorghum

Winter Wheat To New Heights. Helena Elmquist, Odling I Balans

Management strategies for improved productivity and reduced nitrous oxide emissions

The Potash Development Association Oilseed Rape and Potash

Maize Varieties suitable for growing without plastic cover (Uncovered) Four Varieties to cover all situations: AMBITION, BEACON, GLORY and ACTIVATE.

Paper 4 AGRONOMY OF BARLEY PRODUCTION

Optimising cultivar and time of sowing in wheat. Optimising cultivar and time of sowing in wheat

Managing Soil Fertility. Teagasc Soil Fertility Management Spring 2015

PROVEN RELIABLE BEST VALUE. Maize Catalogue. forage, biogas & grain

Canola After Pulse Crops

Karradale Trading 2018 Year in Review. Anna-Lisa & Craig Newman Varley/Lake King SE Hyden Mixed Broad Acre Agzone4

Soil Fertility Management The Optimum Nutrient Balance. Stan Lalor Teagasc, Johnstown Castle. ASA Conference 20 Mar 2014, Portlaoise

Effective Integration of Livestock & Cropping. Simon Vogt Rural Directions Pty Ltd

CROPS COSTS AND RETURNS

Agronomic Management Practices For Improving Selection Rate For Malting Barley

Cover Crops. Brendan Paul Connecting agri-science with farming

Reintroducing grain legume-cereal intercropping for increased protein. Plant Biology and Biogeochemistry Dept., Risø National Laboratory, DK-

Cover Crops. Why are we interested in these?

Implementing a Soil Health Management System in a Corn/Bean Rotation

Challenges for increasing crop productivity: Farmer & scientist solutions

Agriculture. Paper 1. Centre Number. Student Number. Total marks 70

Wheat after Beet - Managing the Trade Off

Forage maize seminar UCD Lyons Estate Research Farm Forage Maize Research Programme update

Presentation by Mark Branson 2004 Nuffield Scholar. Using Precision and Conservation Agriculture to Improve Farm Profits and the Environment.

Nutrient management on organic cattle farms

A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE TO GROWING BARLEY

FertiliserStatistics2017

THE NO 1 SPRING FEED BARLEY FOR IRISH GROWERS RELIABLY HIGH YIELDS WITH EXCELLENT DISEASE AND STRAW

Outline Delta/DF&WT Overview Should I Cover Crop? Winter Cover Crop Varieties Challenges and Opportunities

Buchan Agricultural Consultants Ltd. Greening: Crop Diversification & Ecological Focus Areas

The Potash Development Association Grain Legumes need Potash

Fertiliser Choice Optimising grass and forage yields on livestock farms

Name of the experiment: Estimation of production cost and benefit cost ratio of some vegetable crops

NEW ZEALAND SURVEY OF CEREAL AREAS AND VOLUMES: JULY 1, 2018

Optimising cultivar and time of sowing in wheat

Common millet management

Preventing Sulphur Deficiency. What a difference Sulphur could make to your crops...

Canola varieties. Simon Craig, (BCG) Take home messages. Background

Cover Crops Paul Brown Kings and Frontier

Cover Crops. Brendan Paul Connecting agri-science with farming

ROW SPACING fact sheet

Residue for Cover Crops in RUSLE2

Stored water, summer rainfall and the impact of summer fodders Cam Nicholson

Productive and profitable pulse crops in the Northern Victorian Mallee

K. S. SOMASHEKAR*, B. G. SHEKARA 1, K. N. KALYANA MURTHY AND L. HARISH 2 SUMMARY

Agronomy for early sown canola

Nutrient management. Rice

Spring Wheat. The Spring Wheat Revival

CROP PLACEMENT AND ROW SPACING fact sheet

over Crops and Grazing

Response of Bannister and Williams oats to sowing date and plant density

(A) garden (B) agriculture (C) crop (D) all of the above

RESEARCH IN ORGANIC ARABLE CROPS IN FRANCE

The Spring Barley Guide. Crops Environment & Land Use Programme

Soil Management and Fertilizer Use: Cover Crops

4R Nitrogen Management to Increase N Use Efficiency and Reduce N Losses. David Burton Department of Plant, Food, and Environment

Spring malt barley response to elemental sulphur the prognostic value of N and S concentrations in malt barley leaves

Magazine TCS de conservation.com

Options for reducing soil nitrous oxide emissions in the NSW dryland grains industry

Field Layout / 2012 Crop Plan Field I: acres FSA Farm / Tract Numbers:

Staunton. Long term establishment & black-grass control project. Christine Lilly

14 FARMING PRACTICES Land preparation. - To control the growth of weeds; - To shape the seedbed (into ridges, beds, or mounds).

STUDIES ON INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WHEAT

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Greening Update FAS Webinar 31 st October Simon Lunniss, RPA

Transcription:

Producing low protein malting barley Richie Hackett Oak Park

Outline The dilution effect key to low protein Management effects on protein Nitrogen effects on protein Summary

Low protein malting barley % protein.% Referred to as distilling barley Very little produced in 2016 Significant requirement Achieving low protein requires large dilution effect Protein must be diluted by grain yield Crop requires different management to normal malting barley

Dilution of grain protein content Protein Yield (t/ha) = Grain yield x % Protein Protein yield = tonnes of protein produced per hectare % protein = %N x 6.25 (for barley) Protein yield mirrors nitrogen yield

Protein yield (t/ha) More fertiliser N /hectare = more protein yield /hectare 0. 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 After grass Extra N from soil 0 50 100 150 200 250 N rate (kg N/ha)

Protein yield (t/ha) More fertiliser N /hectare = more protein yield /hectare 0. 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 N rate (kg N/ha)

Yield (t/ha) Protein (%) Yield and % protein response to fertiliser N 13 7 6 5 4 3 2 High Dilution protein 12 Low 11 Dilution 10 9 7 6 1 Protein (%) 5 0 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 N rate (kg N/ha)

Dilute the protein as much as possible with yield Protein Yield (Starch)

Protein Yield Protein Yield (t/ha) = Grain yield x % Protein % Protein = Protein Yield Grain Yield For lower protein Reduce and/or Increase

What influences protein yield INFLUENCING FACTORS Protein yield = Nitrogen yield N inputs Soil N Fertiliser N rate N in manures/slurries High organic matter - Near grass - Repeated manure/slurry inputs Very heavy soils Previous crop

Protein (%) Survey - Effect of years in tillage on protein 10 9.5 9.5 7.5 7 1-5 6-10 10-20 >20 Years in tillage

Protein (%) Survey Effects of previous organic manure applications on protein 10 9.5 9.5 0 1 2 3 Organic manure applications in past 3 years

Management effects on % protein Protein Yield Grain Yield = % protein Protein Yield Protein Yield % Protein Grain Yield

Grain yield (t/ha) % protein Protein yield (t/ha) Yield limiting factors increase % protein Phosphorus example 0.6 0.55 Protein Yield 0.5 0.45 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 P rate (kg P/ha) 9.4 9.2 9. % Protein Grain yield.6.4 7.2 6 5 4 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 P rate (kg P/ha) 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 P rate (kg P/ha) P Index 1 site

Grain yield (t/ha) % protein Protein yield (t/ha) Yield limiting factors increase % protein Sulphur example 0.6 Protein Yield 0.55 0.5 0.45 10.5 % Protein 0.4 0 16 24 32 S rate (kg S/ha) 10 9.5 7.5 7 Grain yield 9.5 6.5 6 0 16 24 32 S rate (kg S/ha) 5.5 5 0 16 24 32 S rate (kg S/ha)

Grain yield (t/ha) % protein Protein yield (t/ha) 1 0.9 0. 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 11 10.5 10 9.5 9.5 7.5 7 6.5 6 Good disease control will help reduce protein Protein Yield No fungicide Low fungicide high fungicide Fungicide Grain yield No fungicide Low fungicide high fungicide Fungicide 12 11.5 11 10.5 10 9.5 9.5 % Protein No fungicide Low fungicide high fungicide Fungicide

Grain yield (t/ha) % protein Protein yield (t/ha) Non leguminous cover crops small effect on % protein Protein Yield 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 6 5 4 3 phacelia mustard natural regeneration Cover crop Grain yield 10 9.5 9.5 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 % Protein phacelia mustard natural regeneration Cover crop 2 1 0 phacelia mustard natural regeneration Cover crop No fertiliser N applied

Grain yield (t/ha) % protein Protein yield (t/ha) Cover crop management can have small effects on % protein Protein Yield 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 early ploughing + early glyphosate early glyphosate Cover crop management normal ploughing 10 9 % Protein 6 5 Grain yield 7 6 4 3 2 1 0 early ploughing + early glyphosate early glyphosate normal ploughing 5 early ploughing + early glyphosate early glyphosate Cover crop management normal ploughing Cover crop management

% Protein influencing factors Agronomic management (excluding N) can have modest effects on % protein Nitrogen inputs have a more consistent effect on protein More nitrogen = Higher % protein Factors that give the crop more N will tend to give increased protein Fertiliser N Slurries/manures High soil organic matter/heavy soils Leguminous cover crops

Grain yield (t/ha) % protein Protein yield (t/ha) Leguminous cover crops can increase % protein Protein Yield 0. 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 Mustard Grass pea Lentil Peas Hairy vetch Cover crop 11 10.5 10 9.5 % Protein 9.5 9.5 7.5 7 Grain yield 9.5 Mustard Grass pea Lentil Peas Hairy vetch Cover crop 6.5 6 Mustard Grass pea Lentil Peas Hairy vetch Cover crop Must have lots of legume to get effect

Fertiliser N trials Range of fertiliser N rates (0-240 kg N/ha) Range of sites Low N index sites Some N in seedbed (30-40 kg N/ha) Remainder at mid tillering (split second split for very high rates) Measured yield and protein Used data to examine how different N rates affected yield and protein

Yield (t/ha) Protein (%) Little effect of delayed split on yield; small positive effect on protein. 10 11 9 10.5 10 9.5 7 9 6.5 5 4 7.5 7 3 6.5 2 6 2split GS31 GS32 GS37 GS61 TIMING OF FINAL N Note: Applications at GS61 can lead to immature (green) tillers at harvest

Yield (t/ha) Effect of N rate on grain yield and Nopt over sites and seasons (Low N index sites) 10 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 N rate (kg N/ha)

Protein content (%) A given fertiliser rate can give a range of protein % 16 15 14 13 13.2% 12 11 10 9 7 7.7% 6 5 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 N rate (kg N/ha)

Protein content (%) Chances of meeting distilling standard decrease as fertiliser N increases 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9.% protein 7 6 5 4 0 30 60 90 120 150 10 210 240 N rate (kg N/ha)

Protein content (%) Chances of meeting distilling standard decrease as fertiliser N increases 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 7 6 5 4 1 62 3 29 14 10 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 10 210 240 N rate (kg N/ha) % crops. % protein

Protein content (%) Protein increases by 0.2% for every 10 kg N/ha 16 15 14 y = 0.021x + 6.635 13 12 11 10 9 7 6 5 4 0 30 60 90 120 150 10 210 240 N rate (kg N/ha)

Nitrogen rate questions What was the economic N rate? What protein does the economic optimum N rate give? What was the average N rate that gave distilling spec barley? How does this rate compare with the economic optimum rate? Was there a yield penalty incurred in producing distilling spec barley?

Fertiliser N rates for yield and protein Summary of 22 sites (2011-2016) Unit Mean Min Max Economic optimum N rate (N opt ) kg N/ha 177 120 241 Yield at N opt (t/ha) 7.7 5.4 9.0 % protein at N opt % 10.2.7 13.0 N rate that gives.% protein (N. ) kg N/ha 123* 22 221 Yield at N. (t/ha) 7.0* 4.0. Yield loss between N opt and N. (t/ha) 0.5* 0.03 2.76 * Data are mean of 20 sites -2 sites did not produce grain at.% protein

Scenario analysis Scenario 1 Manage for distilling low protein Use average N rate that gave <.% protein (120 kg N/ha) Scenario 2 Manage for yield hope for distilling Use average optimum N rate (175 kg N/ha) Scenario 3 Manage for yield only (feed barley) Use average optimum N rate (175 kg N/ha)

Methodology For each of 22 individual sites Yield at 120 kg N/ha and 175 kg N/ha Determined if protein was below.% Calculated value of yield = Yield x grain price If protein <.% malting premium added to grain price, else feed price used Assumed sufficient brewing barley already produced Calculated cost of fertiliser N = fertiliser N rate x Fertiliser N cost Margin over fertiliser cost = grain value fertiliser value No account taken of other costs (seed, transport etc) Got average margin for all 22 sites

Scenario analysis either distilling or feed N rate Target Distilling success Malting premium 20 40 60 MOFC ( /ha) 120 kg N/ha Distilling 9/22 (41%) 93 99 1059 175 kg N/ha Distilling 4/22 (1%) 959 990 1022 175 kg N/ha Feed - 927 927 927 MOFC = grain value fertiliser cost

Methodology For each of 22 individual sites Yield at 120 kg N/ha and 175 kg N/ha Determined if protein was below 10.% Calculated value of yield = Yield x grain price If protein <10.% malting premium added to grain price, else feed price used Calculated cost of fertiliser N = fertiliser N rate x Fertiliser N cost Margin over fertiliser cost = grain value fertiliser value No account taken of other costs (seed, transport etc) Got average margin for all 22 sites

Scenario analysis either malting (brewing or distilling) or feed N rate Target Malting success Malting premium 20 40 60 MOFC ( /ha) 120 kg N/ha Distilling 175 kg N/ha Distilling 20/22 (90%) 17/22 (77%) 1012 114 123 1056 112 1310 175 kg N/ha Feed - 927 927 927 MOFC = grain value fertiliser cost

Summary Choose long term tillage site (but one with good yield potential) Avoid sites with history of manure/slurry application Ideally choose site with history of low protein For low protein manage crop for maximum yield with minimum fertiliser N input (to maximise dilution effect) Sow early but in good conditions Ensure adequate lime, P, K and other nutrients Ensure good weed, disease and pest control Ideally not more than ~120 kg N/ha to maximise chances of low protein Use previous protein from field to help guage fertiliser N inputs Protein reduces by ~ 0.2% per 10 kg N/ha Timing of N inputs not very critical