email aronq@stanworth.net web www.stanworth.net voice 76-922-316 fax 76-922-277 361 West Hobsonway Blythe CA 9222 SOI-CROP FEASIBIITY REPORT PROJECT: SAMPE.PROJECT FIED: SAMPE.FIED Presented to: SAMPE GROWER Presented by: Aron A. Quist, CPAg/SS
Description Page (s) 1. Description of Services 1 2. Soil Analysis Report, Crop Feasibility Summary 2 3. Field Map, Geo referenced location of soil samples, field structures to scale 3 4. Field Map, with soil pit photographs attached 4. Field Map, with water table depths 6. NRCS, SCS Soil Map 6 7. Soil Analysis Maps, Constituent Variability 7-24 8. Calculated Variables from Soil Analysis Maps 2-27 9. Soil Analysis aboratory Report 28-3
Description of Services: Prior to soil sampling: All fields will be mapped with a global positioning system. This will determine the net farmable acreage on any given field. The maps will include landmarks such as structures, wells, ditches water ports, or any other physical property that may be of importance. Tile maps may be included in the layout to facilitate better site selection of sample location. The GPS will be utilized to develop a sampling grid which will be that of a 1 acre grid for this proposal. The GPS unit will strategically locate each sampling point on a field and will designate all points with a respective number. This is for two reasons: 1. To precision manage any given area. 2. To be implemented into the GIS mapping system. Analysis of samples and turn-around time: As derived from the GPS, there will be a soil sample for every 1 acres. The samples will be taken in a timely manner to work within the normal farming practices of the field. These samples will be numbered respectively and shipped to Stanworth Crop Consultants Agronomical aboratory. The lab will conduct the following tests on the top and second foot of soil: Electro Conductivity of soil (ECe); Soil Saturation Percentage (SP); NO 3 -N, PO 4 -P; Ca, Mg, K, ph, ESP. Additionally, the third to sixth third foot depth will be tested for SP and ECe. SCC has the capacity to conduct analytical tests on all essential elements and nutrients, but will conduct the aforementioned tests for this proposal. Results will be completed working days after sampling. Reporting and Recommendations: Upon the conclusion of the soil testing, the results for each soil test will be implemented into GIS software. The GIS software will then create color-correlated maps that will define the conditions of the field by mapping out the variances of a given test within that field. A different map will be constructed for each test in order to more accurately diagnose deficiencies, sufficiency, and excesses of any given field. Feasibility of growing drip irrigated alfalfa will be addressed based upon tests preformed on samples. Review of Results: The recommendations will be made after the GIS information has been concluded, and will be based upon the quantitative data produced by the laboratories at Stanworth Crop Consultants. This information will then be presented to David Yurosek or other ACX Pacific agent, for further evaluation and to address any anomalies if found.
361 West Hobsonway Blythe CA, 9222 www.stanworth.net f 76-922-277 e aronq@stanworth.net CONSUTANTS, INC Soil Analysis Report, Crop Feasibility Client: Date Reported: Field Name: Net Acres: Current Crop: Potential Crop 1: Potential Crop 2: Potential Crop 3: Potential Crop 4: A CIENT 11/12/211 SAMPE 32.4 FAOW AFAFA AP PARTICIPATING AB NRCS PREFORMANCE ASSESSED ABORATORY (PAP) atitude: ongitude: Altitude, Ft: 33. -11. N/A Comments: THIS FIED CONSISTS PRIMARIY OF THE MEOAND AND IMPERIA SOI SERIES. BASED UPON THESE SOI TEST RESUTS THIS FIED WI REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT RECAMATION EFFORTS ON THE WEST BOCK TO PROVIDE A GOOD ENVIRONMENT FOR EXCEENT PRODUCIING DRIP IRRIGATED AFAFA. THE EAST BOCK HAS GOOD POTENTIA FOR SDI AFAFA. CHECK TMC REPORT, SOME AREAS DISPAYED A HIGH WATER TABE. Prepared by Aron A. Quist, CPAg/SS 11/12/211 Page 1
A SAMPE BEEINE, CAIFORNIA, 142.8 ACRES GIS/GPS SURVEY NOVEMBER/211 CONSUTANTS, INC MAP EGEND Display Streets Water Rivers Soil Sample Point Surface Drain Turnout Port Gate Field Boundary Street Secondary Highway Trail Primary Highway Stream, River, Canal or Ditch J ateral 8 1 14 7 9 2 13 6 1 3 12 11 4 E Peterson Rd Reed Rd
A SAMPE BEEINE, CAIFORNIA MAP EGEND Soil Sample Point Surface Drain Turnout Port Gate Field Boundary, 142.8 ACRES GIS/GPS SURVEY NOVEMBER/211 Display Streets Street Secondary Highway Trail Primary Highway Water Rivers Stream, River, Canal or Ditch J ate ra l CONSUTANTS, INC 1 8 PIT PHOTOS, CICK ON THE PUSHPIN TO OPEN PICTURE OF SOI HORIZONS. 7 14 9 2 6 13 1 3 4 11 E Peterson Rd Reed Rd 12
A SAMPE BEEINE, CAIFORNIA, 142.8 ACRES GIS/GPS SURVEY NOVEMBER/211 CONSUTANTS, INC MAP EGEND Display Streets Water Rivers Soil Sample Point Surface Drain Turnout Port Gate Field Boundary Street Secondary Highway Trail Primary Highway Stream, River, Canal or Ditch J ateral 8 1 14 7 9 2 13 6 1 3 12 11 4 E Peterson Rd Reed Rd
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.NITRATE_N_PPM 84.3 77.4 7.3 63.2 6.1 49 41.9 34.8 27.7 2.6 13. 13.462 84.337 7.874 43.666 44.644 114.4 1.72 19.148 acres 2 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 SOI.NITRATE_N_PPM 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.PHOSPHATE_P_PPM 7. 7.1 6.6 6.1.6.1 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.1 2.6 2.6 7.49 4.89.148.222.64.89 19.148 acres 3 2 1 3 4 6 7 SOI.PHOSPHATE_P_PPM 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.POTASSIUM_PPM 19.7 18.4 16 149.6 134.2 118.7 13.2 87.7 72.2 6.7 41.2 41.171 19.696 14.2 136.362 142.728 973.283 31.197 19.148 acres 1 1 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 SOI.POTASSIUM_PPM 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
SP- SOI TEXTURE COOR INTREPTATION GUIDE USDA SOI TEXTURE CASSIFICATION SP-Soil Texture Interpretation Fine Sand Sandy oam oam Silty Clay oam Silty Clay Clay In inorganic soils, the soil texture of a sample can be estimated by analyzing the water holding capacity of the soil. The saturation percentage (SP) is the amount of water a soil sample can hold by weight. Water is added to the soil and mixed until the sample can hold no more. The higher the % moisture, the higher fraction of fines or clay particles that are in the sample. Richards,. A. Editor. Diagnosis and improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Washington DC.; USDA ARS, 194. Kaddah, M. Soil Productivity. Personal Communication. Brawley CA 1992.
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.SP_TOPFOOT 9 7 4 3 2 18 28.117 61.612 33.49 4.973 38.169 61. 7.843 19.148 acres 2 1 1 3 4 6 SOI.SP_TOPFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.SP_SECONDFOOT 9 7 4 3 2 18 2.324 7.19 32.194 3.692 33.831 1.972 7.29 19.148 acres 2 1 1 3 4 SOI.SP_SECONDFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.SP_THIRDFOOT 9 7 4 3 2 18 21.312 62.79 41.483 31.171 28.744 61.716 7.86 19.148 acres 2 2 1 1 3 4 SOI.SP_THIRDFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.SP_FOURTHFOOT 9 7 4 3 2 18 2.76 8.1 37.394 33.72 31.441 64.786 8.49 19.148 acres 1 1 3 4 SOI.SP_FOURTHFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.SP_FIFTHFOOT 9 7 4 3 2 18 22.233 88.91 66.38 43.822 37.692 282.82 16.79 19.148 acres 1 1 3 4 6 7 8 SOI.SP_FIFTHFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.SP_SIXTHFOOT 9 7 4 3 2 18 23.81 83.213 9.43 4.28 33.929 241.898 1.3 19.148 acres 2 1 1 3 4 6 7 8 SOI.SP_SIXTHFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.ECE_TOPFOOT 6 16 12 8 6 4 2.966.938 4.972 3.8 3.66.949.974 19.148 acres 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 SOI.ECE_TOPFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.ECE_SECONDFOOT 6 16 12 8 6 4 2.773 1.62 9.29 3.197 2.379 4.32 2.86 19.148 acres 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 SOI.ECE_SECONDFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.ECE_THIRDFOOT 6 16 12 8 6 4 2.29 9.87 9.8 2.88 1.8 3.71 1.937 19.148 acres 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 SOI.ECE_THIRDFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.ECE_FOURTHFOOT 6 16 12 8 6 4 2 1.27 12.33 11.6 3.391 2.48 4.37 2.9 19.148 acres 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 SOI.ECE_FOURTHFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.ECE_FIFTHFOOT 6 16 12 8 6 4 2 1.91 6.13 4.39 3.27 3.39 1.177 1.8 19.148 acres 1 1 2 3 4 6 SOI.ECE_FIFTHFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS SOI.ECE_SIXTHFOOT 6 16 12 8 6 4 2 1.86 6.62.34 3.1 2.628 1.7 1.23 19.148 acres 2 1 1 2 3 4 6 SOI.ECE_SIXTHFOOT 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS ECe_AVERAGE_TOP_3_FEET 8.4 7.3 6.6.9.2 4. 3.8 3.1 2.4 1.7 1 1.1 8.448 7.438 3.27 2.621 2.9 1.84 19.148 acres 2 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 ECe_AVERAGE_TOP_3_FEET 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS ECe_AVERAGE_TOP_6_FEET 8.1 7.8 7.1 6.4.7 4.3 3.6 2.9 2.2 1. 1.476 8.146 6.67 3.263 2.73 2.44 1.43 19.148 acres 2 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 ECe_AVERAGE_TOP_6_FEET 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
SOI SAINITY- CROP INTREPRETATION COOR GUIDE YIED OSS POTENTIA DUE TO SATS (ECe). Maas Salinity Interpretation None -1% 11-2% 26-% 1-Max. Above Max. The relative salt tolerance of most agricultural crops is known well enough to give general salt tolerance guidelines. oss in yield potential due to soil salinity (Maas 1981) has been evaluated for many field, vegetable, forage and tree crops. These losses in yield potential are indicated by the color chart above. Ayers, R. S., and Westcot, D. W. Water Quality For Agriculture. Rome Italy; FAO of the United Nations. 198 Page 16 of 29
A SAMPE AFAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS MAAS REDUCTION IN AFAFA YIED POTENTIA DUE TO ECe 6 1. 8.8.4 3.4 2 1.1 8.448 7.438 3.27 2.621 2.9 1.84 19.148 acres 2 1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 AAS REDUCTION IN AFAFA YIED POTENTIA DUE TO 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
FAFA FEASIBIITY CONSUTANTS 11_2_lb_acmin1 397.3 372 346.7 321.4 296.1 27.8 24. 22.2 194.9 169.6 144.3 144.321 397.277 22.96 24.76 232.694 3,.481.231 19.148 acres 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 11_2_lb_acmin1 11/12/211 AT J 4.rgs
361 West Hobsonway Blythe CA, 9222 v 76-922-316 f 76-922-277 e info@stanworth.net w www.stanworth.net NFTA CERTIFIED AB AP PARTICIPATING AB NRCS PAP ABORATORY SOI ANAYSIS REPORT FIED ID: GROWER: A.SAMPE.GROWER. SUBMITTED BY: SCC DEIVERED TO: A.SAMPE GROWER. DATE SUBMITTED: 11/4/211 DATE REPORTED: 11/1/211 CROP: AFAFA AB # AREA NO3-N P4-P K SP % ECe ds/cm ph Ca Mg Na ESP FREE method/uom Olsen/ppm Saturation Paste NH4OAC/ppm IME 1828 1-1' 13.4 2.6 41 28.1.96 7.99 1,674 18 76 3.2 M 1829 1-2'. 1.8 17 29.2.77 8.2 1,16 116 73 4. H 1826 1-3' 21.3 1.29 18261 1-4' 24.3 1.73 18262 1-' 72. 1.7 18263 1-6' 71.3 2.39 18264 2-1' 41.4 4.2 113 39. 3.37 7.67 3,138 47 229 4.8 H 1826 2-2' 7.8 1.7 26 33. 1. 8.8 1,899 27 126 4.6 H 18266 2-3' 26.2 1.88 18267 2-4' 4. 2.46 18268 2-' 29. 1.9 18269 2-6' 2.4 2.41 1827 3-1' 4.8.7 184 37.8 3.37 7.64 2,92 431 176 4. M 18271 3-2' 12.3 2. 88 28.2 1. 8.12 2,762 328 11 2.8 M 18272 3-3' 23.4.81 18273 3-4' 24. 1.2 18274 3-' 26.2 1.82 1827 3-6' 23.8 1.93 18276 4-1'.2 4.9 138 36.4 3.19 7.78 2,976 412 174 3.9 H 18277 4-2' 8.4 2.3 66 27. 1.23 8.14 2,379 247 84 2. H 18278 4-3' 24.4.96 18279 4-4' 24.6 2.28 1828 4-' 22.2 2.4 18281 4-6' 24.1 1.4 18282-1' 46. 6 143 37.6 3.91 7.82 3,113 484 331 6.7 H 18283-2' 21.6 3.2 78 32.2 2.9 8.2 2,79 432 28 6.4 H 18284-3' 27. 1.77 1828-4' 24.7 3.7 18286 -' 31.6.37 18287-6' 29.7 2.81 OPTIMUM RANGE 1. 12. 8. 3. 2. 6. 3 4 1 1. N/A 2. 1. 12. 7. 4. 7. 6 12 2. N/A Stanworth Crop Consultants, Inc. Confidential 11/14/211 Page 1
361 West Hobsonway Blythe CA, 9222 v 76-922-316 f 76-922-277 e info@stanworth.net w www.stanworth.net NFTA CERTIFIED AB AP PARTICIPATING AB NRCS PAP ABORATORY SOI ANAYSIS REPORT FIED ID: GROWER: A.SAMPE.GROWER. SUBMITTED BY: SCC DEIVERED TO: A.SAMPEGROWER. DATE SUBMITTED: 11/4/211 DATE REPORTED: 11/1/211 CROP: AFAFA AB # AREA NO3-N P4-P K SP % ECe ds/cm ph Ca Mg Na ESP FREE method/uom Olsen/ppm Saturation Paste NH4OAC/ppm IME 18288 6-1' 32.8.9 143 36.8 3.6 7.8 3,63 423 222 4.8 H 18289 6-2' 8.1 2.8 66 28. 1.4 8.1 2,878 3 148 3. H 1829 6-3' 24.7 1.98 18291 6-4' 31.2.7 18292 6-' 27.7 4.72 18293 6-6' 28. 3.93 18294 7-1' 2. 4.2 84 28.8 3.69 7.94 2,7 31 174 4.4 H 1829 7-2'.9 3.4 6 2.3 2.14 8.11 2,419 23 147 4.3 H 18296 7-3' 2.7 1.83 18297 7-4' 2.7 2.13 18298 7-' 24.6 4.2 18299 7-6' 26. 2.33 183 8-1' 46.8.2 126 3.2 3.41 7.76 2,996 41 173 3.9 H 1831 8-2' 19. 2.8 89 34.4 2.2 8. 3,262 437 216 4.4 H 1832 8-3' 29. 1.8 1833 8-4' 49. 2.19 1834 8-' 23.6 2.2 183 8-6' 29. 1.8 1836 9-1' 84.4.9 11 39.2 4.69 7.7 3,341 487 24 4.7 H 1837 9-2' 26.8 3. 91 36.4 2.33 7.94 3,214 476 24. H 1838 9-3' 29..29 1839 9-4' 32.9 1. 1831 9-'.4 1.81 18311 9-6' 2.9 1.64 18312 1-1' 46 4.9 134 4..8 7.83 3,63 61 413 7.1 H 18313 1-2' 21 2.9 99 4.6 7.22 7.97 3,86 691 77 12.1 H 18314 1-3' 39. 6.19 1831 1-4' 3.2 3.61 18316 1-' 27.1 6.13 18317 1-6' 32.7 6.62 OPTIMUM RANGE 1. 12. 8. 3. 2. 6. 3 4 1 1. N/A 2. 1. 12. 7. 4. 7. 6 12 2. N/A Stanworth Crop Consultants, Inc. Confidential 11/14/211 Page 2
361 West Hobsonway Blythe CA, 9222 v 76-922-316 f 76-922-277 e info@stanworth.net w www.stanworth.net NFTA CERTIFIED AB AP PARTICIPATING AB NRCS PAP ABORATORY SOI ANAYSIS REPORT FIED ID: GROWER: A.SAMPE GROWER SUBMITTED BY: SCC DEIVERED TO: A.SAMPE.GROWER DATE SUBMITTED: 11/4/211 DATE REPORTED: 11/1/211 CROP: AFAFA AB # AREA NO3-N P4-P K SP % ECe ds/cm ph Ca Mg Na ESP FREE method/uom Olsen/ppm Saturation Paste NH4OAC/ppm IME 18318 11-1' 37.8 7. 174 49.3 4.4 7.8 3,828 714 396 6.3 H 18319 11-2' 13.8 4.8 96 34.8 4.22 8.3 2,983 462 34 6. H 1832 11-3' 28.3 2.94 18321 11-4' 8.2 4.28 18322 11-' 79.9 3.74 18323 11-6' 81.6 3.76 18324 12-1' 38..2 196 61.7.41 7.81 4,184 9 63 8.6 H 1832 12-2' 7. 2. 64 36.7 1.1 8.6 4,13 96 8 12.8 H 18326 12-3' 33.2 9.92 18327 12-4' 3.1 12.6 18328 12-' 88.9 4.61 18329 12-6' 83. 6.41 1833 13-1'.6.1 18 6..9 7.8 3,788 74 94 9.3 H 18331 13-2' 16.8 2.7 94 49. 4.83 8. 3,64 73 7 9.1 H 18332 13-3' 63. 2.8 18333 13-4' 27.1 3.48 18334 13-' 2.8 3.69 1833 13-6' 27.1 3.76 18336 14-1' 47.9.1 142 4.4 2.77 7.81 3,667 629 327.6 H 18337 14-2' 19. 2.6 17 7.6 3. 8. 3,92 789 47 7. H 18338 14-3' 4.1. 18339 14-4' 21.7 1.6 1834 14-' 82.2 1.79 18341 14-6' 62.9 2.99 OPTIMUM RANGE 1. 12. 8. 3. 2. 6. 3 4 1 1. N/A 2. 1. 12. 7. 4. 7. 6 12 2. N/A Stanworth Crop Consultants, Inc. Confidential 11/13/211 Page 1