Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Identifying Sources to be Evaluated for Inclusion in an Increment Assessment

Similar documents
Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Determining Modeling Domain

NJDEP Comments on STAPPA/ALAPCO/WESTAR List of Issues to be Addressed in the PSD Reform Initiative

RULE Prevention of Significant Deterioration Adopted 9/24/84, Amended 11/18/85, 9/2/99, Amended 1/12/12 (Effective 2/8/13)

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permitting. Scoping Meeting

Cumulative Impact Analysis (CIA)

Comments on Hi-Test Sand PSD Modeling Protocol Submitted by Kalispel Tribe of Indians October 2017

Chapter 7 RATE OF PROGRESS DEMONSTRATION

An Overview on GHG PSD Permitting

NORTH CAROLINA PSD MODELING GUIDANCE

PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation & Permitting in Georgia

PSD Background Presentation

New Source Review Staff Presentation Community Advisory Council

Air Permi>ng: A Major Piece of the Puzzle or Trying to Keep All of

AIR REGULATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA 3 JUNE 2016

Introduction. This submission demonstrates that Rhode Island s current SIP is at least as stringent as the current federal program.

Chapter 7 RATE OF PROGRESS DEMONSTRATION

Table of Contents. (a) APPLICABILITY... 1 (b) EXEMPTIONS... 1 (c) DEFINITIONS... 1 (d) STANDARDS... 2

Technical Manual Guideline on Air Quality Impact Modeling Analysis

SUNY Westchester Community College Air Emissions Permit Program Latest Revision Date January 2, 2016 Previous Revision Date June 12, 2015.

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

Comments on ADEQ s NAAQS SIP/Minor NSR Permitting Guidance Document

Table of Contents. (a) APPLICABILITY... 1 (b) EXEMPTIONS... 1 (c) DEFINITIONS... 1 (d) STANDARDS... 2

2007 Area Source Emissions Inventory Methodology UNSPECIFIED COMBUSTION SOURCES

Wyodak Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

Naughton Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

"LIST AND CRITERIA" INDEX INTRODUCTION Section 1 - General Application Information... 5

Complying with 1-Hour NO2 NAAQS

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Air Division. Technical Support Document. for. EPA s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

New Source Review (NSR) Reform. Modeling Guidance: Policies and Procedures

Clean Air Act Emission Limits

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT DRAFT STAFF REPORT. Annual Offset Equivalency Demonstration.

Chapter 6 CO, PM 10, and Other Pollutant Air Quality Impacts and Mitigation For Project Operation

Guidelines for Soil and Vegetation Analysis And Visibility Analysis

Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District (

An Overview of GHG PSD Permitting. Melissa Hillman Managing Consultant Trinity Consultants

NO2, SO2, PM2.5, Oh my!?! Information Session EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop May 10, 2010

NSR Program for PM-2.5 NAAQS. Overview of Potential Proposal

1.0 Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to provide for the following:

PROPOSED ADOPTION OF RULE 3.25, FEDERAL NEW SOURCE REVIEW FOR NEW AND MODIFIED MAJOR PM2.5 SOURCES FINAL STAFF REPORT

FINAL DETERMINATION. To Grant a. Temporary Permit/Non-Attainment New Source Review Permit. For. Concord Steam Corporation.

Technical Manual Guidance on Preparing an Air Quality Modeling Protocol

Appendix B2. Air Dispersion Modeling

Table of Contents. (a) APPLICABILITY (b) EXEMPTIONS (c) DEFINITIONS... 2

Regulation I Rule 110 New Source Review (NSR) And Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)

SO 2 Air Dispersion Modeling Report for White Bluff Steam Electric Station. ERM Project No The world s leading sustainability consultancy

Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District Policy

7/23/2014. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. July 23, 2014

The requirement to obtain a Part 70 operating permit under this rule shall not apply to:

CHP, Waste Heat & District Energy

Biomass Emissions Permitting in Pennsylvania

Model Evaluation and SIP Modeling

Additional Information to Supplement PSD Air Permit Application and State Air Facility Permit Application (# /00004)

Arkansas Department of pollution Control and Ecology Division of Air Pollution Control. Summary Report Relative to Permit Application

Appendix G. Precursor Demonstration

New 2015 Ozone Standard and Implications. July 2016

Modeling For Managers. aq-ppt5-11

Rule PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

GOVERNMENT of PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD

Table of Contents. (a) APPLICABILITY (b) EXEMPTIONS... 1

SCOPE OF WORK: TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR WRAP ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS POINT AND AREA SOURCE EMISSIONS October 14, 2004

Tribal Class I Implications

INDEX. August 23,

STATEMENT OF BASIS for NEWARK BAY COGENERATION PARTNERSHIP L.P.

Rule 210.1A MAJOR NEW AND MODIFIED STATIONARY SOURCE REVIEW (MNSR)

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION FISCAL NOTE FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO GREENHOUSE GAS PERMITTING

B. 308 ARIZONA SIP IN REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP (WRAP) 12 in Arizona + Others outside AZ impacted by AZ emissions. 308(d)

NO 2 NAAQS Guidance. Supervising AQS. RSL Atlanta, Ga June 7,

Single-Source Impacts on Secondary PM 2.5 Formation A Case Study

TECHNICAL FACT SHEET September 24, 2018

DRAFT. Revised Policy On Exclusions from Ambient Air

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Division ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR BOILERS

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Emission Inventory EMISSIONS INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA. Presentation Outline 9/30/2015

Rule PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION

Technical Contact. Conrad Carter, Jr., P.E. President (704) PO Box 1760 Albemarle, NC

ABSTRACT LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND

YOLO-SOLANO AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 1947 Galileo Court, Suite 103; Davis, CA Phone (530) ; Fax (530)

EXAMPLE AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS CHECKLIST a

Appendix 9-C Cumulative PM-10 Emissions Inventories (PSD/Major Sources and Local Sources)

A. INTRODUCTION B. POLLUTANTS FOR ANALYSIS

MPCA Citizens Board. Michael Sandusky Director Environment Analysis and Outcomes Division

APPENDIX C SCAQMD PERMIT APPLICATION

Huber Engineered Woods, LLC, TV Page 1 of 7

NSR Pre-Reform. Emlyn Vélez Rosa, EIT US. Environmental Protection Agency- Region III Office of Permits and Air Toxics

Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology Division of Air Pollution Control. Summary Report Relative to Permit Application

Technical Guide for Preparing a Record of Nonapplicability for the General Conformity Rule

Ambient Air Quality Analysis (Attachment L)

TO: NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, NORTH DAKOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL WAYNE STENEHJEM, AND MERIDIAN ENERGY GROUP, INC.

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT DRAFT STAFF REPORT

4.4 AIR QUALITY Approach to Analysis

TAB E CLASS II AND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS DISPERSION MODELING REPORT - REVISED

New Source Review (NSR) Program Review Questionnaire May 14, 2003

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED STAFF REPORT

ADEQ OPERATING AIR PERMIT

Serving Two Masters; Understanding Texas and EPA Permitting Programs

Technical Contact. Mike Knudson Environmental Manager (252) Gaston Road Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870

ASA Bloomingburg, LLC. Air permit-to-install (PTI) number Public Hearing Date April 18, 2006 Comment Period End Date April 25, 2006

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Transcription:

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Identifying Sources to be Evaluated for Inclusion in an Increment Assessment Approved By: Date: XXXXXXXX Arnaud Marjollet, Director of Permit Services Purpose: The purpose of this guidance is to provide the rationale for determining which source(s) is/are required to be evaluated for inclusion in an Increment Assessment. II. Applicability This policy applies to all PSD projects required to conduct a Increment Assessment. III. Definitions Significant Impact Area (SIA): is the area, more specifically the receptors, in which the modeled concentration is equal to or greater than the SIL value for a given regulated criteria pollutant. Significant Emission Rate (SER): means any emissions rate or any net emissions increase associated with a major stationary source or major modification. SER Threshold Values Pollutant Averaging Period PM2.5* Annual 24-Hour PM10 Annual 24-Hour Carbon 8-Hour Monoxide (CO) 1-Hour Nitrogen Oxide Annual (NO2) 1-Hour Annual Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) SER (Tons/Yr) APR 19XX - 1 10 15 100 40 24-Hour 40 3-Hour 1-Hour *The District is currently non-attainment

Secondary : means emissions which would occur as a result of the construction or operation of a major stationary source or major modification, but do not come from the major stationary source or major modification. Vicinity: for the purpose of this policy is defined as 10 kilometers from the maximum impacted receptor found during the SIL assessment. IV. Background The purpose of an increment assessment is to determine on a pollutant-by-pollutant basis if the modeled concentration within the SIA exceeds an Increment threshold. An increment assessment is comprised of five components; 1) the proposed project s source(s), 2) Any emissions unit at the proposed facility permitted after the minor source baseline date 3) Any Major or Minor unit in the vicinity of the SIA permitted after the minor source baseline date, 4) Any area source in the vicinity of the SIA constructed after the minor source baseline date, and 5) Any mobile source (roadway) in the vicinity of the SIA after the minor source baseline date. For each receptor, the modeled concentration is the sum of the modeled concentrations from: the proposed project s emission sources, the proposed project s existing emission sources, the nearby Major and/or Minor emission sources, the nearby area sources, and; the nearby mobile (roadway) sources. NOTE!! When performing an increment assessment both increment consuming and increment expanding activities must be evaluated. For example, an emission unit that was operating before the minor source baseline date and is still in operation is modified to reduce their NOx emissions after the baseline date is considered an increment expanding source. A source permitted after the minor source baseline date (without modifications) is considered and increment consuming source. The receptor with the maximum concentration is then compared to the pollutant s increment threshold. V. Source Identification The following section provides the rationale used by the District to identify sources that are required to be evaluated for inclusion in a cumulative impact assessment. a. Project s Sources All sources seeking a PSD permit must be included in an increment assessment. Additional non-psd sources may be required to be included in an increment assessment. Therefore, it is recommended that the reviewing agency be consulted to ensure that all required emissions sources are identified and included in any assessment. b. Project Existing Source All permitted units at the facility that are permitted after the pollutant specific minor source baseline data should be evaluated in the increment assessment. APR 19XX - 2

c. Nearby Sources (Major, Minor, Area, and Mobile) When determining which nearby sources should be evaluated for inclusion in an increment assessment the sources can be divided into two categories: 1) Sources within 10 kilometers and 2) Sources within 15 kilometers. i. Sources Within 10 Kilometers As stated in District s policy entitled Guidance for Determining Modeling Domain 1, a source s highest concentration is usually found within a radius of 10 kilometers from the source. Therefore, sources that are within 10 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor(s), as identified in the SIL assessment, should be evaluated for inclusion in an increment assessment see Figure 1. If more than one SIA is identified then each SIA must be evaluated and sources with 10 kilometers of each of the SIA s maximum impacted receptor must be reviewed for inclusion. ii. Sources Within 15 Kilometers Additionally, any sources within 15 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor that have a pollutant emissions rate greater than or equal to a SER threshold should also be evaluated for inclusion in the an increment assessment. When making this determination several scenarios may arise and will need to be evaluated. To assist with this determination the following scenarios have been provided. If none of the scenarios presented below are applicable / match the scenario being evaluated then it is recommend that the reviewing agency be consulted. a. Definitions i. The definition of area for the purposes of making this determination is defined to mean within 100 meters 2 radius. ii. The definition of Similar Emission Units for the purpose of making this determination is defined to mean emission units that are of the same equipment type and perform the same function. For example, a boiler and a steam generator are the same type of equipment but perform different functions. This distinction between the equipment type and its function within the facility operation will dictate the dispersion parameters used when modeling. b. Single Emission Unit: i. A single emission unit located within 15 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor should be evaluated for inclusion. c. Multiple Emission Units Located in the Same Area and Not Under a Common Ownership: i. Multiple emission units located in the same area, not under a common ownership, and located within 15 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor should be evaluated for inclusion as separate / individual units. 1 District Web Link Here 2 EPA Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised (Oct 1992) APR 19XX - 3

d. Multiple Emission Units Located in the Same Area and Under a Common Ownership: i. Non-Similar Emission Units: Multiple non-similar emission units located in the same area, under a common ownership, and located within 15 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor should be evaluated for inclusion as separate / individual units. ii. Similar Emission Units: Multiple similar emission units located in the same area, under a common ownership, and located within 15 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor should be evaluated for inclusion as if they were a single emission unit. This is done by summing the emissions from all units to determination if the pollutant emissions rate is greater than or equal to a SER threshold. VI. Estimation Once an emissions unit has been identified, as per Section V above, it needs to be categorized as an increment consuming or increment expanding source. This process can be broken down into to subcategories as 1) Sources operating before the minor source baseline date and 2) Sources that started operation after minor source baseline date. a. Source Operating Before the Minor Source Baseline Data For the purposed of an increment assessment a source that is in operation before the baseline date does not need to be included in the increment assessment unless the source has been modified (permitted sources) or has had increases (area / mobile source) since the baseline date. In this case the source must be evaluated to determine if it is an increment expanding or consuming source. This is done by using the current/proposed permitted emissions limit and subtracting the pre-baseline emissions. The pre-minor source baseline emissions estimates should follow the requirements of Section VI.a.i below. i. Pre-Minor Source Baseline Estimate Since there is no clear definition of how to determine a pre-baseline emissions period in the CFR the District will utilize the basic procedures outlined in District Rule 2201 Section 3.9 Baseline Period. Therefore, the pre-minor source baseline date emissions estimate is the period of time equal to either: 1. the average emissions of the two consecutive years of operation immediately prior to the minor source baseline date; or 2. the average emissions of at least two consecutive years within the five years immediately prior to the minor source baseline date if determined by the APCO as more representative of normal source operation; or 3. a shorter period of at least one year if the emissions unit has not been in operation for two years and this represents the full operational history of the emissions unit, including any replacement units; or 4. zero years if an emissions unit has been in operation for less than one year. APR 19XX - 4

b. Source that Started Operation After Minor Source Baseline Data For the purposed of an increment assessment a source that starts operation after the baseline date needs to be included in the increment assessment. This would include permitted sources, area / mobile with increases and new area / mobile since the baseline date. In this case the source must be evaluated to determine if it is an increment expanding or consuming source. This is done by using the current/proposed permitted emissions limit and subtracting modification that reduce emissions and adding modification that increase emissions. When dealing with area / mobile sources the emission reducing and emissions increases are based on rules or regulates included in the state implementation plan (SIP). NOTE!! If the computation in VI.a or VI.b is positive the source is said to consume increment. If the computation in VI.a or VI.b is negative the source is said to expand the increment. (E3-3) Class II Increment Assessment Emission Unit Increment Consumption / Expansion Determination For Each Regulated Pollutant and Averaging Period Yes Source Operated Before Minor Source Baseline Date No Current Baseline Initial + / - Modified Current or Proposed Limit Minus Pre-Minor Source Baseline Initial Minus Modification Reducing * Plus Modification Increasing * Increment Type Positive = Consuming Negative = Expanding Modeled *For Non-Permitted sources this would be reduction / increases from rules included in the SIP Figure 1- Increment Estimation VII. Conclusion Based on the information provided above and the District s modeling experience, all proposed sources from a project must be evaluate, sources within 10 kilometers from the maximum impacted receptor must be evaluated for inclusion in any increment assessment and any source that is within 15 kilometers of the maximum impacted receptor that equal to or exceeds a SER, for a given pollutant, must also be reviewed for inclusion in an increment assessment. APR 19XX - 5

VIII. Guidance When conducting PSD modeling the following procedures should be followed: Increment Assessment: o All sources within 10 kilometers from the point(s) of maximum impact should be evaluated for Inclusion. If more than one SIA is identified, then each area must be evaluated and sources within 10 kilometers of each SIA must be reviewed for inclusion. o All sources within 15 kilometers from the point(s) of maximum impact that are to a SER threshold should be evaluated for inclusion. If more than one SIA is identified, then each area must be evaluated and sources within 15 kilometers of each SIA must be reviewed for inclusion. APR 19XX - 6

Project Site i. All Sources within 10 km should be evaluated for inclusion 10 km Max Impact 15 km ii. All Sources within 15 km that are than a SER threshold should be evaluated for Inclusion Figure -1 Increment Impact Model APR 19XX - 7