South Venice Water Quality

Similar documents
MS4 Assessment Program to Satisfy Part V. Monitoring Requirements

City of Delray Beach MS4 Assessment Program: Part V. Monitoring Requirements MS4 Permit No. FLS

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

The Myakka River. Presented to the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council January 9, 2009

Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech

The Myakka River Water Quality Monitoring Update

Nitrogen Management through Land Use. Holly Greening, Tampa Bay Estuary Program July 2010

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS OCTOBER SEPTEMBER 2017 SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN THE LOXAHATCHEE ESTUARY

Redwood Shores Lagoon November 2016 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2019 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Redwood Shores Lagoon August Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

7 October Re: Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring Quarterly Reports #6

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2017 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

calendar year periods. The nutrient thresholds for streams set forth by FDEP are listed in table below along with the map showing zones.

calendar year periods. The nutrient thresholds for streams set forth by FDEP are listed in table below along with the map showing zones.

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Update

EPA Numeric Criteria Where do we stand now? Mark W. Clark

LAKEWATCH Report for Weeki Wachee-1 in Hernando County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Introduction Streams

Water Quality Assessment for the Town of Caswell Beach, 2008

Warm Mineral Springs Sampling by Sarasota County

Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) Regulations

Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan Two Years Later

Water Quality Monitoring Report. Tom Ash Assistant Director Water Management Division October 16, 2014

Acidity and Alkalinity:

Water Quality Indicators

Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations?

Summary of Basin Characteristics and Facilities. General Land-use Characteristics: Withdrawal and Discharge Sites: Sampling Site Statistics:

Florida Nutrient Criteria Update

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1

Sugar Creek Watershed Watershed Number:

CBF Water Quality Interactive Map

CAFO Permits & Nutrient TMDLs

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

GULF OF MEXICO - SEGMENT 2501

Factsheet: City of West Haven Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

MARK TWAIN LAKE WATER QUALITY REPORT. for

Factsheet: Town of East Lyme Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

2016 HLWD WATER QUALITY RESULTS CATHERINE WEGEHAUPT WATERSHED TECHNICIAN JULY 2017 BOARD MEETING

WHIPPANY RIVER WATER QUALITY TREND ANALYSIS STUDY

2018 WATER QUALITY MONITORING BLUE MARSH RESERVOIR LEESPORT, PENNSYLVANIA

Improving Water Quality in the Lick Creek Watershed by Improving the Performance of Septic Systems

Development of Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Florida

Fall Line Input Monitoring on the Potomac River at Chain Bridge

Nutrient Limits: What to Expect. Water Division Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

Ambient Water Quality Objectives For The Tributaries To Okanagan Lake Near Kelowna

Salem River Water Quality

Little Cypress Bayou Special Study - Subwatershed 1.10

Phosphorus Goal Setting Process Questions and Answers 2010

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

Factsheet: Town of Trumbull Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL)

Factsheet: Town of Hamden Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

CARLYLE LAKE WATER QUALITY REPORT. for

Florida s Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards

South Carolina Water Quality Standards. Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008

2006 Aliceville Reservoir Report. Rivers and Reservoirs Monitoring Program

Update on Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development

Table of Contents. Table of Figures

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

MassDEP Water Quality Monitoring in the Merrimack Watershed: Therese Beaudoin MassDEP Division of Watershed Management

Grants Pass Water Quality Monitoring

MARK TWAIN LAKE 2002 WATER QUALITY

Water Quality in Seneca Lake Tributary Streams

MARK TWAIN LAKE 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT

Water Quality Advisory Committee (WQAC) Chloride Trends. Delaware River Basin Commission West Trenton, NJ March 29, 2018

Henderson Watershed WRIA 13. Chapter Includes: Tanglewilde Stormwater Outfall Woodard Creek Woodland Creek

Water Quality Criteria Update

2016 WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROMPTON RESERVOIR PROMPTON, PENNSYLVANIA

Water Quality Report: Ambient Monitoring Stations in the Oregon Coast Coho Evolutionarily Significant Unit

Analysis of Chlorophyll-a and other data collected in the Illinois River Watershed from

Pembina River Watershed Water Quality Report

Irrigation. Branch. Crowfoot Creek Watershed Study. Why was this study conducted? How was this study conducted?

2016, 2017 Estuarine Water Quality and Modeling in the Royal and Cousins Rivers

ANRA Environmental Laboratory

GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE: A SOURCE OF NUTRIENTS TO LAKE LOCHLOOSA?

Impacts to Aquatic Habitats from Land-Use or Is It Polluted?

Sandies Creek Watershed

Lower Guadalupe River Watershed

2016 WATER QUALITY MONITORING BELTZVILLE RESERVOIR LEHIGHTON, PENNSYLVANIA

Sewage pollution and eutrophication in Florida s coastal waters: the role of septic tanks

Chapter Seven: Factors Affecting the Impact of Nutrient Enrichment on the Lower Estuary

LAVACA BASIN SUMMARY REPORT

Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrient TMDLs for Little Gully Creek (WBID 1039)

Terrestrial Drivers of Coastal Plain Stream Water Quality in North Carolina

El Dorado Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No Water Quality Monitoring Report

Water Quality Wrap-Up

EUTROPHICATION. Teacher s Manual

«225 «146. ^_ Texas Stream Team. !. Monitoring Station. "/ USGS Flow Station # Wastewater Outfall. Location Map. Morgan's Point. La Porte.

Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Scope of Certification

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

Vancouver Watershed Health Assessment. Burnt Bridge Creek Watershed

Evaluation of Water Quality in. Sylvia Heaton Water Bureau, MDNRE

Big Bend Model. Wayne Magley Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section FDEP. March 7, 2016

STORMWATER POLLUTANT ASSESSMENT AT THE CITY OF KISSIMMEE

Issue Date: December 6, 2018 File: To: From: Client: Project Name. Project No Subject:

LAKE TARPON WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SCOPE OF WORK

Water Quality. New Standards on the Way? by Marty P. Lamia and Albert R. Capellini, P.E., BCEE

Manitoba Water Quality Standards, Objectives, and Guidelines Dwight Williamson, Manager Water Quality Management Section Manitoba Conservation

Transcription:

SARASOTA COUNTY South Venice Water Quality Summary of Data Collected in Support of the South Venice Civic Association Water Quality Task Force Sarasota County Water Resources 8//24

Introduction The South Venice Civic Association s Water Quality Task Force is undertaking an effort to naturalize the canals within its area in order to bring life to the waterways. Since March 23, the Sarasota County Water Resources section has been collecting water quality samples from the four canals slated for enhancement to quantify existing conditions and to measure improving trends from the proposed work. The sampling locations are shown in Figure. Locations were chosen at the head (upstream), middle and tail (downstream) of each of the canals: Siesta Waterway, Briarwood Waterway, Woodmere Creek North and Woodmere Creek South. Due to increased interest in the Venice Gardens lake system by the Venice Gardens Community Association and the Water Quality Task Force and their effect on the Briarwood Waterway, sampling has begun at four (4) sites in the lake system and will include that data in future updates. Figure - Map of sampling locations relevant to the South Venice initiative Sampling includes noting the general conditions, collecting in situ water quality characteristics and taking water samples for analysis by a certified laboratory. The list of analytical parameters is in Table. Parameters with an asterisk (*) have recently had updated criteria promulgated by the state of Florida s Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency.

Field PARAMETERS Laboratory Temperature Ammonia Specific Conductance Nitrate + nitrite Salinity Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen ph Total Nitrogen* Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Orthophosphate DO Percent Saturation* Total Phosphate* Depth Corrected Chlorophyll a* Apparent Color Biochemical Oxygen Demand Turbidity Total Suspended Solids Fecal Coliform Table Analytical Parameters Criteria are set depending on the class of waterbody they apply to. Florida has 5 classes: Drinking water supplies (Class I), shellfish harvesting areas (Class II), recreational (both marine and fresh) (Class III), agricultural supplies (Class IV) and industrial (Class V). The majority of the waterbodies in Florida, including those around South Venice, are either Class III Marine or Class III Freshwater. Standards were set for freshwater waterbodies and the estuarine waters (bays) since there was an abundance of data available. The tidal creek portion (between the upstream fresh and downstream saltwater segments) lacked sufficient data for FDEP to create new nitrogen, phosphorus and dissolved oxygen standards and they declined to do so. The chlorophyll standard for tidal creeks is micrograms per liter (ug/l).the criteria for nutrients, chlorophyll a and percent saturation of dissolved oxygen are listed in Table 2. Most sampling locations occur in the tidal creek portion of the watershed. As criteria have not been established for these areas, both the freshwater and estuarine criteria will be displayed for comparison. Parameter Peninsular (freshwater) Estuarine (marine) Tidal Creek Total Nitrogen.63 mg/l.56 mg/l Not to cause an imbalance in flora or fauna Total Phosphorus.48 mg/l.26 mg/l Not to cause an imbalance in flora or fauna Chlorophyll a 2 ug/l.89 ug/l ug/l % Dissolved Oxygen Not yet sure which 38% 42% (daily average) standard applies Annual Arithmetic Annual Geometric Mean for Nutrients Mean for Nutrients; and Chlorophyll Annual Mean for (Criteria are specific Chlorophyll to Lemon Bay) Table 2 - Recently approved FDEP criteria for nutrients, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen

In order to track the how waterbodies are doing, the FDEP divided the watersheds into sub-units called WBIDs, assigned a class to them, and named them after the main waterbody. Figure 2 shows the WBIDs (denoted by numbers) and their class relative to the South Venice area. WBIDS in the South Venice area include 22, 23, 23A, 239, and 983A. Figure 2 Map or relevant WBIDs with respect to the South Venice Initiative. The criteria for nutrients, chlorophyll a and percent saturation of dissolved oxygen are listed in Table 2. Parameter Peninsular (freshwater) Estuarine (marine) Tidal Creek Total Nitrogen.63 mg/l.56 mg/l Not to cause an imbalance in flora or fauna Total Phosphorus.48 mg/l.26 mg/l Not to cause an imbalance in flora or fauna Chlorophyll a 2 ug/l.89 ug/l ug/l % Dissolved Oxygen Not yet sure which 38% 42% (daily average) standard applies Annual Arithmetic Annual Geometric Mean for Nutrients Mean for Nutrients; and Chlorophyll Annual Mean for (Criteria are specific Chlorophyll to Lemon Bay) Table 3 - Recently approved FDEP criteria for nutrients, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen Most sampling locations occur in the tidal creek portion of the watershed. As criteria have not been established for these areas, both the freshwater and estuarine criteria will be displayed for comparison.

ALL ALL-2 ALL-3 Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail WoodN-Head WoodN-Mid WoodN-Tail WoodS-Head WoodS-Tail Data Summary The following series of graphs depict the data gathered since March 23 through May 24. The most recent sampling occurred on July 22 nd but data wasn t available for this report. Sampling occurs monthly in Alligator Creek (5 samples) and every other month in the other waterways (7 samples). The first series show the mean (average), minimum and maximum for the sampling period to data and provide a comparison between each of the waterways. The second are time-series graphs depicting all the data collected to date for each waterway. For those parameters with applicable criteria, both the freshwater and marine standards are shown. Period of Record Summaries (mean, maximum and minimum) of Key Parameters 8 Total Nitrogen 6 4 2 Marine Standard

ALL ALL-2 ALL-3 Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail WoodN-Head WoodN-Mid WoodN-Tail WoodS-Head WoodS-Tail ALL ALL-2 ALL-3 Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail WoodN-Head WoodN-Mid WoodN-Tail WoodS-Head WoodS-Tail 3 Total Phosphorus 2.5 2.5.5 Marine Standard Chlorophyll a 4 2 8 6 4 2 Marine Standard Tidal Standard

ALL ALL-2 ALL-3 Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail WoodN-Head WoodN-Mid WoodN-Tail WoodS-Head WoodS-Tail 25 Fecal Coliform 2 5 5

Time Series plots of Key Parameters by Waterway

4 3.5 3 2.5 2.5.5 Total Nitrogen ALL-2 ALL ALL-3 Estuarine Standard 4 3.5 3 2.5 2.5.5 Total Nitrogen Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail Estuarine Standard 7 6 5 4 3 2 Total Nitrogen Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Estuarine Standard

Total Phosphorus.4.2.8.6.4.2 ALL ALL-2 ALL-3 Estuarine Standard Total Phosphorus.4.2.8.6.4.2 Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail Estuarine Standard Total Phosphorus.4.2.8.6.4.2 Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Estuarine Standard

Chloropyll A 8 6 4 2 ALL ALL-2 ALL-3 Estuarine Standard 8 6 4 2 Chlorophyll A Siesta-Head Siesta-Mid Siesta-Tail Estuarine Standard 8 6 4 2 Chlorophyll A Briar-Head Briar-Mid Briar-Tail Estuarine Standard

Discussion The summary plots really illustrate how different each of the waterways are. It can t be stressed enough that this is a limited amount of data. For most sites, only 8 samples were taken every other month. Any conclusions should be taken as preliminary. The Briarwood Waterway exceeds the total nitrogen and chlorophyll a criteria. As this waterway drains the highly eutrophic lakes of Venice Gardens, this is expected. For most of the other sites and waterways, the annual means are at or near the freshwater criteria. Due to the activities covers regarding the Venice Gardens lakes and the interest in the Briarwood Waterway for the SVCA Water Quality Task Force, future summaries will include data sampled from the lakes. The Siesta Waterway exceeds the total phosphorus standard for freshwater along with Woodmere Creek South. These areas as well as the rest of Sarasota County are underlain with material naturally high in phosphorus which may help explain the excess. Other causes would include fertilization and septic tank effluent. For fecal coliform, all sites except the downstream Alligator Creek Site (AL-3) exceeded the 8 counts per milliliter daily standard. Although this parameter is not assessed in this manner for regulatory purposes, it can indicate areas for further investigation. The means for the Siesta Waterway are off scale as the first samples drawn were all >2, which increases the mean values to around 5,. If continued sampling indicates that the excessive values were out of line, the effect on the mean will continue to diminish and eventually may be considered an outlier. There is also an effort underway to modify the bacteriological standard and the County is monitoring that effort and will make adjustments if changes come about. The time series plots clarify the patterns previously noted. As the database grows, trends and seasonal patterns may evolve overtime. This initial sampling effort was scheduled to last a year but as the project moves forward it may become evident to continue monitoring beyond that timeframe.