Presentation on Draft SCED RFP

Similar documents
California ISO Energy Imbalance Market Operations Overview. June 10, 2014 Webinar

Functional Entity Roles and Responsibilities

Energy Imbalance Market Design Straw Proposal and Issue Paper. Stakeholder Meeting April 11, 2013

Energy Imbalance Market Overview

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

ENERGY IMBALANCE MARKET BUSINESS PRACTICE ( EIM BP ) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Communication with the PSEI EIM Entity 3.

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Energy Imbalance Market

EIM Settlements Load Customer Training September 13, 2016

Energy Imbalance Market

Business Practice Energy Imbalance Market (EIM BP) Revision Number: Revision Date: November 30July 29, 2015

PACIFICORP S ENERGY IMBALANCE MARKET ENTITY PROPOSAL. September 13, 2013 Revised October 18, 2013

Mid-C Seminar July 16 th, 2014

Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards. Preliminary Draft Version 0 Reliability Standards September 1, 2004

Transmission Loading Relief Eastern Interconnection

NWPP Market Assessment and Coordination Initiative

Standards Authorization Request Form

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR ANCILLARY SERVICES REQUIREMENTS PROTOCOL

CAISO EIM Straw Proposal Process

Stakeholder Meeting on Supplement to Dynamic Transfers Straw Proposal

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Utility Scale Integration of Wind and Solar Power

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Open Access Transmission Tariff ATTACHMENT K

NERC Reliability Functional Model

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Introduction Interchange Terms... 4

NERC Reliability Functional Model Technical Document Version 5

August 18, Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Entity Readiness Criteria

Appendix 5B. Statement of Compliance Registry Criteria

Energy Imbalance Market Year 1 Enhancements

Appendix 5B Statement of Compliance Registry Criteria Revision 5.2 Effective: October 15, 2015

Interchange Reference Guide line s Version 2

Xcel Energy s Comments on CAISO Draft Final Straw Proposal

New York Independent System Operator, Inc. NYISO Tariffs. OATT Schedules

Proposed Definitions for the NERC Glossary of Terms Project : Emergency Operations

Stakeholder Comments Template

Introduction to the Energy Imbalance Market (EIM Module 1)

New Brunswick Electricity Business Rules. Chapter 3 Reliable Operations

Seminar on African Electrical Interconnection. Module 7 - Market Operational Structures

NAESB Coordinate Interchange Business Practice Standard (Request For Interchange, RFI)

155 FERC 61,111 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Regional Resource Adequacy Stakeholder Meeting on Straw Proposal

PJM Manual 27: Open Access Transmission Tariff Accounting Revision: 88 Effective Date: November 16, 2017

Draft Whitepaper to Platte River Board of Directors

Definitions O - P. Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS) or PJM Open Access Same-time Information System:

Western Energy Imbalance Market

1st International Conference on Large-Scale Grid Integration of Renewable Energy in India Durgesh Manjure, MISO Energy September 6, 2017

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Business Practice Manual for Reliability Requirements. Version 34

Procedures for designating a Scheduling Entity & Operating and Scheduling Protocols For Scheduling Entities

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Market Simulation Structured Scenarios. Energy Imbalance Market Implementation Arizona Public Service and Puget Sound Energy

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Business Practice Manual For The Energy Imbalance Market. Version 67

Statement of Compliance Registry Criteria (Revision 3.1)

Joint and Common Market ITEM 4 PSEUDO TIES

Intertie Deviation Settlement. Straw Proposal

Demand Response Availability Data Systems Definitions

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Working Paper on Standardized Transmission Service and Wholesale Electric Market Design

MOD-001-1a Available Transfer Capability Implementation Document

Stepped Constraint Parameters. Issue Paper

Revised Draft Final Proposal for Participation of Non-Generator Resources in California ISO Ancillary Services Markets

Exhibit A. Reliability Standards Proposed for Approval

Issue Paper. Direct Participation of Demand Response Resources in CAISO Electricity Markets. December 22, CAISO JEP / BDC/ JDG 12/22/08, page 1

With funding provided by the US Department of Energy, NREL, and the Utah Office of Energy Development

Full Network Model Expansion Second Revised Straw Proposal

Contents. DRAFT Capacity Deliverability Fact Finding Summary Report

APS Stakeholder Meeting. September 9 th 2016

SPP EIS Market Training. Markets 301

California Independent System Operator Corporation

Day Ahead Market Enhancements. Issue Paper/Straw Proposal

Straw Proposal. Post-Release 1 MRTU Functionality for Demand Response

PacifiCorp Contract Review. Discussion Paper

Dynamic Transfers Final Proposal

Intertie Deviation Settlement. Draft Final Proposal

Dynamic Transfers Dynamic Schedules Pseudo-Ties

Relevant changes will be made to corresponding sections of OA and RAA.

Day-Ahead Market Enhancements Phase 1: Fifteen-Minute Granularity. Second Revised Straw Proposal

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Energy Markets - The Basics

Southern California Edison Stakeholder Comments. PacifiCorp s Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Entity Proposal Dated October 18, 2013

Dispatchable Intermittent Resource (DIR) Workshop

Energy Imbalance Market Year 1 Enhancements Phase 2. Draft Final Proposal

Standards Authorization Request Form

Full Network Model Expansion Draft Final Proposal

Welcome to the California Independent System Operator. August 7, 2015

3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the

March 11, 2014 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

MISO MODULE B FERC Electric Tariff TRANSMISSION SERVICE MODULES Effective On: November 19, 2013

SPP EIS Market Overview. Western Visitors

Approved by Standing Committees Approved by Board of Trustees

Standards for Imports of Regulation

2018 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap

Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards

5.1 Transmission Congestion Charge Calculation Calculation by Office of the Interconnection.

Introduction to RRG Drafting Team Proposal

Transcription:

Presentation on Draft SCED RFP Pre-RFP Release Conference October 9, 2014 Presenters: Eric Espenhorst, Seattle City Light Erin Apperson, Puget Sound Energy Robb Davis, BPA Roger Bentz, BPA Kevin Holland, Avista (on behalf of the NWPP RFP Work Group) 1 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Agenda Introductions and Background RFP Objectives Respondent Instructions Proposal Content Pii Pricing Expectations ti Evaluation Criteria RFP Timeline APPENDIX: Sept. 2014 draft version of SCED Design Summary to be updated prior to SCED RFP Issuance

Background The MC Initiative was launched in 2012 to explore a range of alternatives that could help the BAs and scheduling utilities in the Northwest Power Pool ( NWPP ) area address growing operational and commercial challenges affecting the regional power system. The NWPP includes 19 participants with a peak load of approximately 64 GW and more than 110 GW of installed generation. The Northwest Power Pool Market Assessment and Coordination Committee ( MC Initiative ) is seeking a Market Operator ( Market Operator ) to provide a range of services associated with a sub-hourly, security constrained economic dispatch ( SCED ); also known as an Energy Imbalance Market ( EIM or Market ). 3 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

RFP Objectives Issued by the MC Initiative as an invitation it ti to qualified interested t parties to submit proposals to offer Market Operator services with a go-live in Fall 2017. Outline what the MC Initiative believes it needs from a qualified Market Operator. Provide sufficient information for a potential Market Operator to respond effectively with its proposal to implement and operate a SCED within a region covering a yet-to- be-finalized market footprint comprised of a portion of the Western Interconnection, excluding the area of the California Independent System Operator and the Alberta Electric System Operator. 4 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Respondent Instructions Complete and submit Notice of Intent to Participate Form. Bidder questions and proposals must be submitted to the NWPP MC Initiative via email at proposal@nwppmc.org. Respondent must certify that it is not nor is any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate affiliated with any MC Initiative member entity or potential participant in the proposed SCED market. Respondent must certify that it is not nor is any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate a purchaser or seller of electric energy or capacity. Once the RFP is issued, Bidders could be disqualified for contacting members of the NWPP MC regarding the RFP outside of the prescribed email process. Respondent must affirm it is not subject to any existing legal restrictions (contractual, regulatory, etc.) that would preclude it from performing the duties of a Market Operator. 5 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Proposal Content Development Plan Describe in detail the methodology and the approach the Respondent will use in the planning, design, development, integration, implementation, testing (including supported market trials with Market Participants), training, and deployment of a SCED according to the guidelines provided in this RFP. Operations Plan Indicate the logistical details of Respondent s proposed Market Operation physical location, organizational chart detailing the number of employees and their functions, governance structure (including Market Participant support), hardware/software requirements, and disaster recovery processes. Detailed Pricing Pricing must be provided using the Pricing Proposal Template included with the RFP. Description of Corporate Structuret Describe the Respondent s corporate structure including parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates and its corporate governance. Identify any standards, applicable licenses, or maintenance and support agreements that will be required to facilitate a final agreement. Provide Signed Copy of Confidentiality Agreement Signature of duly authorized officer on Proposal 6 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Pricing Expectations The pricing should reflect the cost the Respondent expects to incur in configuring its existing SCED to operate in the NWPP region and customized to the region according to the Design Specifications. If the Respondent can provide requested line-item item functions without incurring additional costs, explain how and list those items as no cost in the gross Offer price. Describe the process and costs associated with the entrance of new Market Participants and exit of existing Market Participants after the initial SCED implementation. Provide the expected internal cost to Market Participants for their implementation of and participation in the SCED. Two Pricing options are requested: (1) Respondent bears the development costs, and recovers those costs after go-live by a fee (2) Payments made as development milestones are met 7 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Pi Pricing i Template Market Operator Costs Category Forw ard Function Forw ard Function Forw ard Function Forw ard Function Real-Time Market Real-Time Market Real-Time Market Real-Time Market Back Office Back Office Back Office Back Office Tagging and Scheduling Tagging and Scheduling Administration Administration Administration Administration Function Load Forecasting <Customizations> Resource Sufficiency <Customizations> Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) <Customizations> Energy Management System (EMS) <Customizations> Settlements <Customizations> Customer Relationship Management (CRM) <Customizations> Native Load Scheduling <Customizations> Training Initial Cost ($K) On-going Annual 2015 2016 2017 Cost ($K) Back Office <Customizations> On-going Annual Cost refers to the costs associated with operating the SCED on an annual basis <Customizations> Legal and Regulatory <Customizations> Customization of existing systems to meet the design requirements must be detailed separately (in place of <Customizations>) with associated marginal pricing TOTAL Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members Initial Cost includes all development and implementation costs associated with developing the SCED and incurred in each year of 2015, 2016, and 2017 8

Key Evaluation Criteria Criteria Responsiveness/Completeness of Proposal Previous Relevant Experience Respondent s demonstration ti of its capabilities to meet the RFP objectives Respondent s Offer for cost of services Respondent s organizational and technical approach Tentative: Not approved by the Executive Committee. The MC Initiative reserves the right to adjust these criteria as necessary. 9 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

RFP Timeline Milestone Target Completion Date Pre Offer Conference 10/9 Confirm Intent to Offer End of October RFP Issued 10/31 Respondent Questions Due 11/10 MC Initiative Response to Questions Released 11/17 Proposal Submission Deadline 12/19 Proposal Evaluation (including interviews, as necessary) January 2015 Offer Selection and Notification February 2015 Tentative: Not approved by Executive Committee. The MC Initiative reserves the right to adjust this schedule as necessary. 10 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Next Steps 1. Notify NWPP MC of intent to offer by submitting email to proposal@nwppmc.org 2. Your organization will receive a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to complete. The NDA is required to receive RFP supporting information. 3. Once RFP is released, all communication related to the RFP must be facilitated by the RFP team: 1. Above email 2. Scheduled vendor meetings 4. NWPP MC will do its best to answer all questions. Questions received prior to 11/10 will have priority; these questions will be consolidated and the answer shared with all vendors. 11 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Questions Please submit all questions and proposals to: proposal@nwppmc.org p pp 12 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

APPENDIX Draft SCED Summary NOTE: The content of these slides is under revision by the NWPP MC Policy and Market Design WGs and will be updated for issuance as an attachment to the SCED RFP. Please direct questions to: questions@nwppmc.org on the content of these slides. 13 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

SCED Design Summary The following slides summarize the technical and functional design elements for how a Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) within-hourhour energy only market is envisioned to work. Desired outcomes include the leverage of diversity, economic optimization and improved reliability for participating Balancing Authority Areas (BAAs). This summarization has been prepared to promote a general understanding of the SCED design and to foster an on-going g dialogue regarding g the policy and technical issues addressed below. 14 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Design Cornerstones 1. The Southwest Power Pool (SPP) Energy Imbalance Service (EIS) market was chosen as the basis for the design of the NWPP-MC SCED within-hour market design. This is due to the similarities between the current state of the NWPP and where SPP was when they designed their EIS market. 2. The NWPP-MC SCED market design differs from the SPP EIS in numerous areas due to regional differences including, but not limited to, hydro prevalence, coordinated generating systems, multiple transmission providers, reserve sharing, voluntary participation, and market monitor considerations. 3. The SCED addresses within-hour energy dispatch actions only and is not intended to change the bilateral energy markets in place today. 4. A SCED Market will need willing buyers and sellers to provide sufficient liquidity. 15 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Organization 5. The NWPP-MC SCED will be administered by an independent, non-profit entity serving the participating i BAAs and Market Participants, i t and will be governed by a Board of Directors. This may be the NWPP. 6. The NWPP-MC SCED will be provided, supported & operated by an independent Market Operator (MO) to be chosen through the open RFP process referred to above. 7. The Market Operator (MO) will file the market design with FERC for approval and its administration of relevant tariffs will be subject to FERC Jurisdiction. 8. The MO will be a market operator only and will not assume any of the current NERC functional roles. 9. To leverage existing capabilities, the NWPP-MC SCED will incorporate several key systems operated and supported by Peak Reliability including but not limited to the Flow-Based System Model, and Flow Forecast. 16 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

General Market Characteristics 10. The SCED is designed around 5-minute dispatch cycles which calculate locational imbalance pricing and dispatch resources up or down and distribute corresponding adjustments to each participant BAA s Net Scheduled Interchange (NSI). 11. Each 5-minute dispatch cycle will concurrently do two things: (a) compute composite imbalance of load and generation in the market footprint and dispatch the most economic resources to resolve that imbalance; and (b) displace more expensive resources with less expensive resources based on the Generation Owners, Operators (GOP) supplied offer curves and Resource Plans. 12. All Energy Imbalance within the market footprint, relative to hourly schedules, will be resolved through the 5-minute dispatches. 13. In the absence of imbalance, the SCED will still seek to displace higher cost resources with lower cost resources for each 5 minute dispatch. 14. The MO will use a SCED algorithm to instruct the dispatch of offered resources within the real-time capability of the electric grid to arrive at nodal clearing prices. 15. All data required from Market Footprint loads and generation are required to be provided to the MO not later than 30-minute prior to the hour. 17 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Balancing Authority Areas 16. BAA s in the NWPP have the option of joining the SCED or remaining independent. 17. If a BAA joins the SCED, all generation and load within that BAA are subject to SCED protocols. 18. The SCED Market Footprint is made up of the sum of all participant BAAs. 19. The governance structure for SCED will provide guidance for entry/exit to/from the market footprint by participating NWPP BAAs. 20. Participating in the SCED will not change the reliability obligations of BAAs. 21. Generation outside the Market Footprint can participate in the SCED by pseudo-tying the generator into a participating BAA. 22. BAAs will continue providing regulation (to maintain moment-to-moment balance within the BAAs footprint). 23. The SCED design preserves the benefit of the NWPP Reserve Sharing Group (RSG) which will continue to provide and deploy contingency reserves (spin and non-spin) as they do today. 18 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Loads 24. Load points can be configured in the market at a nodal granularity (nodal meaning at the point where the load interconnects with the high-voltage electric grid) or as aggregated load zones (where load zones are limited to loads in a single BAA). 25. The effect of grouping loads into a zone is the melding of load imbalance pricing in Market Settlement) to the aggregated level. 26. Loads in the Market Footprint will be required to provide a load forecast to the MO, which can be updated until the real time hour (subject to market gate closure timeline). 27. The MO will also develop load forecasts for the loads in the footprint and will compare its forecast with thatt from the Load as a quality assurance check. 28. Loads in the Market Footprint will be required to submit Native Load Schedules (NLS) to the MO describing the anticipated generation to load energy delivery needs for Network Integration Transmission Service (NITS) customers, which can be updated hourly (subject to market gate closure timeline). 29. The Market does not change the E-tagging/scheduling requirements for scheduling interchange transactions. 30. Native Load Schedules and E-tags combine to provide a complete picture of energy delivery schedules within, into and out of the Market Footprint prior to SCED a requirement of the market design. 19 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Generation 31. Generators will be configured in the market at a nodal granularity (nodal meaning at the point where the generation interconnects with the high voltage electric grid), except as noted below. 32. Accommodation will be provided to optionally group generators whose nodal impact on every flowgate defined within the footprint are electrically similar within the bounds of the accuracy of Peak s network model and flow forecast tools. 33. Generation Owners, Operators (GOPs) in the market footprint are required to provide a Resource Plan for each of their generators to the MO. This plan can be updated hourly (subject to market gate closure timeline). 34. The Resource Plan will indicate the status of the resource ( Available indicating the resource has some MW band that is dispatchable by the market or Self Dispatched the resource is not at all dispatchable by the market) and the MW range available for market directed movements. 35. GOPs in the market footprint tare required to provide an Ancillary Service Plan (ASP) (for each of their resources designated to provide regulation or contingency reserves) to the MO. This plan can be updated hourly (subject to market gate closure timeline). 20 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Generation (continued) 36. The ASP will indicate which resources or portions of a resource are providing regulation and contingency reserves and how many MWs are allocated for each. 37. GOPs in the market footprint are required to provide offer curves for each of their resources that are available for economic dispatch to the MO. These offer curves can be updated hourly (subject to market gate closure timeline). 38. Offer curves provide the economic input to the SCED dispatch calculation and include a monotonically increasing $/MW for the full (designated dispatchable) generating range of the resource. 39. The NWPP-MC design will accommodate offer curves with 15, 30, 45 or 60 minute durations that all must be submitted prior to the market gate closure timeline. This granularity provides participants the opportunity to address load ramps in their pricing strategies. 21 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Resource Sufficiency 40.Resource Sufficiency (RS) (in the hour-ahead period at a minimum, and potentially at preschedule) is a core principle of the SCED architecture. 41.RS is intended to insure that all market participants come to the hour in balance i.e., with sufficient energy, regulation, contingency and capacity that is necessary to meet their requirements. 42.The inputs to the RS check include the Resource and Ancillary Service plans provided by GOPs, the Load Forecasts, Native Load Service (NLS) and e-tags provided by the LSEs or PSEs. 43.Loads and GOPs are expected to be resource sufficient prior to the hour and that the RS check will be conducted no later than the market s gate closure. 44.The BA will continue to monitor RS compliance with regard to participation in SCED. 22 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Energy Dispatch 45.The SCED dispatch will occur every 5 minutes to meet the collective load and obligations of the Market Footprint. 46.The Market Operator s SCED will only dispatch resources within the dispatchable range of resources identified as Available for Market dispatch as designated by the GOP in their Resource Plans. 47.The dispatch actions computed by the SCED will be based on actual load and generation, looking back to the start of the current 5-minute period and will be informed by the current state of the EMS model, the flow forecast and load forecasts produced at a 5-minute granularity. 48.The dispatch actions will have a ramp start time of the beginning of the next 5- minute period and a ramp end time of 5-minutes later to balance expected load determined from the load forecast. 49.Dispatch will be determined by the submitted offer curves and system Limits. 23 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Energy Dispatch (continued) 50.The dispatch requests can be configured to be delivered directly to the generator or to a corresponding intermediary (like the TOP or GOP). 51. Once the dispatches are implemented it will result in generator(s) ramping to a new set-point and the BAA receiving the corresponding new set-point and/or a market NSI adjustment for use in their Area Control Error (ACE) equation. 52.Ramping to a new set point every 5 minutes will result in the BAA getting back any capacity used for regulation between 5-minute dispatches. 53. With a SCED in place, Inadvertent Interchange no longer exists among BAAs participating in the market. 54. A change from WECC s current way of handling Inadvertent accumulation and payback will need to be approved to manage collective inadvertent between the market footprint and the rest of WECC. 24 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Operational Limits 55. TOPs can provide to the MO Variable Transfer Limits (VTLs) (thresholds to protect t the grid from reliability risks due torapid unexpected changes in flow) that are deemed necessary for vulnerable flowgates. The SCED will use any active VTLs as a critical factor in the dispatch calculations. 56. TOPs can provide the MO specific Min Gen thresholds for generators whose output is being used to support enabled Remedial Action Schemes (Min Gen for RAS). The SCED will use any active Min Gen for RAS as a critical factor in the SCED engine s dispatch calculations. 57.The NWPP SCED Market design assumes the Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) now under development by Peak Reliability will be in place prior to adoption of the SCED. 58. Because the SCED engine uses e-tags, a network model, state estimator and flow forecasts, the SCED market dispatches will not cause congestion and will not interfere with congestion relief actions taken by reliability entities. 25 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Settlement 59. The NWPP-MC SCED market design will employ discrete 5-min financial settlements for occurrences between actual and schedule for all load and generation settlement locations within the Market Footprint. 60. For settlement locations that cannot be entirely supported by 5-minute revenue quality meters, the SCED will accommodate the use of SCADA instantaneous readings as the basis for settlements. 61. To accommodate for error, those 5-minute instantaneous values will be calibrated or normalized in the settlement system to hourly revenue quality meter values. 62. The SCED will calculate Location Imbalance Prices (LIPs) for each 5-minute dispatch based on the market clearing price of resources dispatched for that period. 63. The marginal losses associated with SCED dispatches are computed in the SCED calculations (ensuring SCED dispatches attain balance) and are included as a component in the LIP calculation. 64. If no congestion is present across the Market Footprint, all settlement locations will have the same LIP. If there are areas of congestion the LIPs will represent the locational price variances of dispatched resources. 65. These LIPs are used in the discrete 5-minute settlement calculations. 66. The MO will enforce Market Power Mitigation protocols designed to support a robust, liquid NWPP-MC SCED while protecting against unjust or unreasonable market outcomes. 26 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Transmission Compensation 67.A transmission compensation mechanism for market induced increase in grid utilization will be developed to mitigate the risk of a shift in revenue recovery among transmission customer classes due to the SCED energy flows. 68.The transmission compensation mechanism will collect a fee for every SCED market dispatch that increases a generator s output above its schedule and will distribute ib t monies to BAAs based on the maximum increase in tie-line loading for TSPs due to SCED dispatches. 27 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members

Market Monitoring 69.To help insure neutrality and enforceability, the NWPP-MC recommend that the Market Monitoring (MM) function be carried out independent of the Market Operator functions. 70.Due to the abundance of hydro generating resources in the NWPP region, it is imperative that the MM design be reflective of the suite of factors that affect availability and pricing of hydro electric generated energy. 71.A separate MM design effort is underway. 28 Slides not reviewed or approved by all NWPP MC Members