Devin Learn Construction Management AE Senior Thesis

Similar documents
Technical Assignment #2 Cost and Methods Analysis

Job Cost Summary 11/27/08

Project Estimate Summary

Construction Summary

City of Westerville Guide to Commercial Inspections

Takeoff WorksheetLH by Bid Item; with Notes Job# 186 to 186

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Minneapolis Community and Technical College T-Building Floor 2 Student Affairs Cost Estimating Form Templates - Exhibit C

The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Center Mercy Hospital Medical Office Building Baltimore, MD. Thesis Proposal

Thesis Research Proposal The Science & Technology Building, Slippery Rock, Pa

G703 Continuation Sheet Minimum Schedule of Values Please use the breakdown listed below when submitting your billing for the project

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

Matthew Kutzler. Structural Option Spring Buildings C and D Campus Square, Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA

Children s Hospital of Pittsburgh s Clinical Services Building Pittsburgh, PA

TECHNICAL REPORT II STRUCTURAL STUDY OF ALTERNATE FLOOR SYSTEMS

Permit Procedures For New Construction, Additions, and Alterations

New Main Hospital, Site Park, and Underground Garage Construction Progress Update #16

Tech Assignment 1 University Medical Center of Princeton. Plainsboro Road, Township of Plainsboro, New Jersey

5/6/2008. Presentation Outline. Project Overview. Project Overview. Structural System Analysis. Project Overview. Granby Tower

How to Estimate the Cost of a Medical Office Building Using Conceptual BIM (DProfiler)

COURTYARD INFILL STRUCTURE DESIGN

Christopher McCune Structural Option 2006 Senior Thesis Penn State Architectural Engineering. Eight Tower Bridge Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

BIDDING SHEET CHECKLIST--SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS SUBCONTRACTOR/ PHONE DATES SUPPLIER NAME: CALLED BID. Sample

Technical Assignment #3 Alternate System and Methods Analysis

Minitab Headquarters

Kiski Area High School Allegheny Township, PA FLOOR SYSTEM ANALYSIS

PRESENTATION PLAN A MODEL COMPARISON FLOOR CONSTRUCTION

229 Rehoboth Avenue Telephone P.O. Box 1163 Fax

Agenda. Agenda. Project Overview. Project Overview. CM In-House Building Commissioning. Virtual MEP Coordination. Virtual MEP Coordination

DOCUMENT BID DOCUMENT

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

Technical Report 1 Bed Tower Addition at Appleton Medical Center Appleton, WI

HOTEL NORTHEAST U.S. JORDAN RUTHERFORD STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY ADVISOR DR. THOMAS BOOTHBY AE SENIOR THESIS APRIL 8, 2013

INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 5. JOB SITE ADDRESS posted during entire construction process.

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendent s Weekly Activity Report #142 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Tony Greene

Baltimore Washington Medical Center Women s Center and Inpatient Tower Glen Burnie, MD

Outline. Introduction. Structural Redesign Gravity System Floor System Lateral System Weight Comparison Seismic Comparison

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendents Weekly Activity Report #103 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Joe Jett

Manufacturing Facilities Proposal

Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Dr. Boothby, AE Faculty Consultant. Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel

Invitation to Bid. RLS Construction Group requests your firm to submit a quotation on the following project:

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Technical Assignment No. 2 Submitted: Friday, November 2 nd, 2007

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendents Weekly Activity Report #105 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Joe Jett

SENIOR THESIS PROPOSAL STRUCTURAL REDESIGN USING STEEL FRAMING

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STATEMENT OF QUANTITIES. Item No. Description Quantity Estimated Mobilization 1 LS

Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Residential Building Permits

Construction in Healthcare: Does it put Patients or Workers at Risk? Not if we do ICRA correctly! Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA)

Building Architecture

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendents Weekly Activity Report #110 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Joe Jett

PHASE I ACADEMIC BUILDING CORE RENOVATIONS RCNJ Project No C

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendent s Weekly Activity Report #133 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Tony Greene

Prequalification Form

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

Technical Assignment 2

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendent s Weekly Activity Report #131 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Joe Jett

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendent s Weekly Activity Report #139 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Tony Greene

City of Forney - Parks & Recreation Department

Material Report - [Trade Contractors] for plan: [E:\SoftPlan14\Projects\Sample Drawings.spf\2-Storey sqft.spf] Page 1 of 5

Completed. Project. Melbourne High School. Comprehensive Additions and Renovations

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendents Weekly Activity Report #69 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Joe Jett

CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT May 2017 Monthly Status Report

ADDENDUM NO. 2 Consisting of 3 pages and Attachments

Resource Center. Investigation Areas

Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania

Analysis 1: Project Sequencing. Analysis 2: MEP Prefabrication. Analysis 3: Green Roof Implementation. Analysis 4: Alternate Delivery Method

AE Senior Thesis Sixth Street 1

These systems are evaluated on the basis of serviceability issues such as:

APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT

CBD Chemical. Production Building Virginia, USA. Christina DiPaolo Structural Option

Carter's Oshkosh (SIS) # The Center at Pearland Parkway - Pearland, TX Scope Of Work / Bid Qualifications

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendent s Weekly Activity Report #154 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Tony Greene

Design/Build Contract with a Guaranteed Maximum Price (DB w/gmp) East Halls Renovation and New Residence Hall, University Park

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

Jonathan R. Torch Technical Report 2 Columbia University. Technical Report 2. Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 2

603 Summit Avenue, Suite 102 Greensboro, N.C Voice/FAX (336)

Research Facility Core and Shell (RFCS) Presented by Tim Maffett on April 8 th, 2013

George Read Hall. The University of Delaware. Eric Alwine Structural Option Thesis April 2006 Dr. Boothby

Project Background. Penn State School of Forest Resources University Park, PA

Technical Assignment I

MONTHLY STATUS REPORT No.4

Town of Kingsville. Building Department

STRUCTURAL ABBREVIATIONS S-001 GENERAL NOTES CONCRETE MASONRY NOTES DESIGN NOTES SOF NSWG-10 UAS SUPPORT FACILITY FY 2016 MILCON P-225

Section 5 - Project Logistics

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

FDA OC/ORA Office Building

Implementing Budget Solutions for Schools: Construction Cost and Scheduling Benefits of Using Wood

Delta Gamma Sorority Renovation Budget Scope 3/7/2018

Existing Construction Conditions

EXHIBIT C GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE TO THE CONTINUING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES/RFQ #14-Q-009-KR BY AND BETWEEN

4. Technical Report #3: Alternate System and Methods Analysis

SECTION PAYMENT PROCEDURES

TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT THREE

4.1.3 Project Manual

HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Superintendent s Weekly Activity Report #119 Douthit Hills Student Community, Clemson University Project Joe Jett

Transcription:

Devin Learn Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 5 th and 6 th Floor Fit-Out & Cardiac Elevator Addition Introduction Vs. Retro- Pre-Cast Floor System s at ICRA Partitions and Conclusions Questions Project Cost 5 th and 6 th Floor Fit-Out 44,600 SF 5 th Floor 14,700 SF Nero-Trauma ICU 6 th Floor 29,900 SF ICU Cardiac Elevator Addition 1,600 SF Serving the 5 th and 6 th Floor Spaces. Owned By a Non-Profit Healthcare Facility. Project Cost Owner Mark Matuzak RTKL Benchmark Construction Company Inc. Architect Lan Le General Contractor Chris Smith Structural Matt Loeffler Barton Associates James Craft & Sons, Inc. MEP Engineering Plumbing Contractor Jeff Ream B.J. Baldwin Electric, Inc. Electrical Contractor Art White Dynatech Controls, Inc. Mechanical Contractor Mark Myers Project Cost Chris Smith Project Executive Chris Zamilski Rich Gill Project Manager Project Executive Cardiac Elevator 5 th & 6 th Floor Fit-Out Tim Witmer Todd Heck Rodney Richards Barry Higgins Superintendent Superintendent Superintendent 6 th Floor 5 th MEP Coordinator Floor Project Cost Key Project Dates Start 5 th and 6 th Floor August 11, 2006 Start Cardiac Elevator September 5, 2006 Tower Crane Erection September 20, 2006 Corridor 5 th and 6 th Floor September 5, 2006 DOH Life Safety Inspection December 29, 2006 DOH Licensure Inspection January 15, 2007 1

Project Cost 5 th and 6 th Floor Fit-Out Total Cost - $9,720,090.00 - Square Foot Cost - $200.04 Cardiac Elevator Total Cost - $1,998,973.00 - Square Foot Cost - $1,249.36 5th and 6th Floor Fit-Out Cardiac Elevator Description Cost Description Cost General Conditions $650,881.00 General Conditions $167,519.00 Demolition/Landscaping $82,448.00 Demolition/Landscaping $154,765.00 Concrete $25,549.00 Concrete $87,174.00 Steel $48,496.00 Masonry $17,827.00 Carpentry $1,101,130.00 Steel $527,297.00 Thermal/Moisture $39,252.00 Carpentry $8,782.00 Doors & Windows $768,344.00 Thermal/Moisture $284,954.00 Finishes $1,526,672.00 Doors & Windows $8,954.00 Specialties $123,140.00 Finishes $183,653.00 Equipment $51,862.00 Specialties $11,696.00 Results Steps used to complete Industry Create for Industry Personnel Summarize Results of Published Industry Information Summarize and Develop Recommendations for use Furnishings $28,400.00 Furnishings $1,141.00 Conveying/Hoisting $61,566.00 Conveying/Hoisting $433,698.00 MEP $5,000,100.00 MEP $75,520.00 Contingency and Fee $212,250.00 Contingency and Fee $35,993.00 Total $9,720,090.00 Total $1,998,973.00 Results A survey was created in order to obtain feedback from Industry Personnel on the use of and Retro-. In addition to the survey phone interviews were conducted with Industry contacts in order to obtain more detailed feedback. Industry Personnel ed include Owners, Contractors, and Agents. Results What was the result of the? Owners Major benefits include reduced operations and maintenance costs. Contractors Reduced call backs for warranty and comfort issues. Agents Stress early introduction of commissioning process for project success. Results Issues that were investigated in this section include: Differences in process steps Payback Period Benefits of Results 2

Results Key factors that can have a direct impact on commissioning costs: When the commissioning process starts (during design, construction, or post construction) The number and complexity of systems The level of detail required during the commissioning process (does it include documenting and witnessing all equipment start-up, verification tests, spot checking the balancing report, etc.) Deliverables (design intent document, number of design reviews, commissioning plan, O&M manual review, final report, etc.) Allocation of costs (will the budget allow for increased design fee, increased contractor bid, training time for O&M personnel, the commissioning consultant s fee, etc.) Results of new buildings costs Average cost - $1 per SF Average Payback period - 4.8 years Retro- of existing building equipment costs Average cost - $.05 - $.43 per SF Average Payback period - 2-4 years Type of project (design-build, plan and spec, retrofit, etc.) Results Benefits of Buildings that factor into payback periods and return on investment include: Savings in energy cost and improved building performance Improved indoor air quality, comfort and increased productivity by building users Early detection of potential problems (the sooner problems are resolved, the less expensive they are to fix) Fewer change orders to the owner during construction Precise tune-up and operation of systems and applicable controls Better building documentation Trained building operators and maintenance staff Shortened occupancy-transition period Reduced maintenance, operation, and equipment replacement cost Results The decision to implement the commissioning or retrocommissioning processes involves several variables: Intended use of building Complexity of systems used in the building Owner s goals Availability of commissioning personnel Results 5 th and 6 th Floor Fit-Out Project: Complex systems Congested ceiling space Non-profit owner On-site operations and maintenance personnel Cardiac Elevator Addition 1,600 SF Elevator shaft and lobbies on floors 1-9 Cast-in-place concrete on composite metal decking Structural steel frame Analysis of floor system for floors 5-8 to determine pre-cast plank size availability Cost analysis Devin Learn Devin Learn Construction Construction Management Management AE AE Senior Senior Thesis Thesis 3

Pre-Cast Concrete Plank Floor Decking: T6-E23 Pre-Cast Concrete Plank 6 x 24 Plank w/ 2 topping slab 14 Span Live Load required 150 lbs. sq. ft. Load Allowable 294 lbs. sq. ft. Cardiac Elevator Addition Strescon Industries, Inc. Langhorne, PA Flexicore pre-cast planks Located outside of Philadelphia; about 2 hours from Lancaster Construction Costs of Original Design Cast-In-Place Concrete Slab 3 ½ 4000psi Lightweight Concrete on 2 20Ga. Composite Metal Decking Reinforcing Wire Mesh 1080 SF $428.00 Slab on Deck Accessories 36 Drilled Dowels $796.00 Cast-In-Place Concrete 15 cuyd $1,812.00 Place/Finish Concrete 1080 SF $3,526.00 Composite Metal Decking 1080 SF $2,528.00 Construction Costs of Proposed Design Pre-Cast Concrete Planks 6 X 24 Pre-Cast Concrete Planks w/ 2 4000psi Lightweight Topping Slab Pre-Cast Planks 1080 SF $7816.00 Cast-In-Place Concrete 7 cuyd $800.00 Place/Finish Topping Slab 1080 SF $3,526.00 Total Cost - $12,142.00 Structural Steel Beam W12X16 64 LF $1,440.00 Total Cost - $10,530.00 Construction Cost Comparison Cast-In-Place Floor System $10,530.00 Original 5 Days $12,142.00 Total Savings (-$1,612.00) SOD Pours (Floors 5 to 8) 5 Days New 3 Days Set Pre-cast Floor Planks (Floors 5 to 8) 2 Days Pour Topping Slabs (Floors 5 to 8) 1 Day 4

Access to Elevator Site Material Storage Air Intake (1) Air Intake (2) Loading/Unloading Zone (2) Loading/Unloading Zone (1) Tower Crane w/ Helicopter Pad Self Climbing Scaffold s at ICRA Partitions s at ICRA Partitions Impact Reducing rework at ICRA Partitions by Selection of Mechanical Identify requirements for ICRA partitions Identify standard connection types Evaluate impact on project cost and schedule Impact Based on Infection Control Risk Assessment Guidelines the 5 th and 6 th Floor Project is a Class V which requires: Isolate HVAC system within work areas to prevent contamination of duct system. Block off and seal HVAC registers, grills and any openings in ductwork to remain Maintain negative pressure within work site utilizing HEPA equipped air filtration units. s at ICRA Partitions s at ICRA Partitions Impact Impact Adds un-planned cost to the project Additional Cost of Rework Description Hours $/Hr. Total Laborer 4 $50 $200 Laborer 4 $50 $200 Carpenter 4 $70 $280 Total Labor 12 $170 $680 Misc. Material $500 Total $1,180 Impacts on schedule could cause problems Both of which are AVOIDABLE! 5

and Conclusions and Conclusions Depth : Vs. Retro- Breadth 1: Cast-In-Place Vs. Pre-Cast - Differences in Steps between and Retro- Depth : Vs. Retro- Breadth 1: Cast-In-Place Vs. Pre-Cast Proposed Pre-Cast Concrete Floor Plank System - Increased Cost - Decreased - Not enough to offset costs Breadth 2: Mechanical s at ICRA Partitions - Recommendations for Use Breadth 2: Mechanical s at ICRA Partitions and Conclusions Depth : Vs. Retro- Breadth 1: Cast-In-Place Vs. Pre-Cast Breadth 2: Mechanical s at ICRA Partitions Proper Planning and Installation of Mechanical s - Eliminate Rework - Reduce Impacts Tower Crane CRANE OPERATION LOAD CHART Hook Radius Distance Trolly (Ft.) (Ft.) 123.0 45.9 11023 lbs. 49.2 11023 lbs. 52.4 11024 lbs. 55.7 11025 lbs. 59.0 11026 lbs. 62.3 10438 lbs. 65.6 9854 lbs. 68.8 9325 lbs. 72.1 8840 lbs. 75.4 8410 lbs. 78.7 8013 lbs. 82.0 7638 lbs. 85.2 7309 lbs. 88.5 6988 lbs. 91.8 6701 lbs. 95.1 6437 lbs. 98.4 6183 lbs. 101.6 5952 lbs. 104.9 5731 lbs. 108.2 5522 lbs. 111.5 5335 lbs. 114.8 5147lbs. 118.0 4982 lbs. 121.3 4817 lbs. 123.0 4739 lbs. 6

7