APPENDIX D STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION AND INFILTRATION SIZING

Similar documents
APPENDIX E Drainage and Stormwater Management Report

6 STOREY CONDOMINIUM 7480 DERRY ROAD WEST, MILTON

Rated for 80% TSS Removal by Metro Nashville Water Services

Site Servicing and Stormwater Management Report for Site Plan Control Application C&C Transportation 8015 Russell Road Ottawa, Ontario

STORM WATER REPORT. Proposed Row House Complex Clare and Hilson 566 Hilson Ave. & 148 Clare St. Ottawa, Ontario PREPARED FOR:

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

WinSLAMM v Program Modifications Final, 3/16/19

CENTRALIZED BMPS TYPICALLY PUBLICLY OWNED & MAINTAINED BMPS, TREATING A LARGE (>20 ACRES) URBAN DRAINAGE WITH MULTIPLE LAND

Applying the Water Quality Volume

WinSLAMM v Program Modifications Final, 12/12/17

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS. ChamberMaxx. Open-Bottom Infiltration

WinSLAMM v 10.0 User s Guide. Stormwater Control Devices

low impact development demonstration project

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS. CDS Guide Operation, Design, Performance and Maintenance

Design Example Residential Subdivision

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

Stormwater Treatment Measure Sizing and Design Considerations SMCWPPP C.3 Workshop June 21, 2017

Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report

PERKFILTER. Design Guide

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT INTERIM GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

Planning Considerations for Stormwater Management in Alberta. R. D. (Rick) Carnduff, M. Eng., P. Eng. February 20, 2013.

SCHAEFFERS FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LAKESHORE ROAD WEST TOWN OF OAKVILLE

Credit Calculations and Calculator Functions

OHM Groups. FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT 33 Arkell Road City of Guelph August 5, Prepared By:

Water Resources Management Plan

1956 Altona Road, City of Pickering Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report. Marshall Homes. Project # E15031

Manufactured Water Quality Solutions

The proponent is responsible for meeting all approval requirements from relevant agencies.

D. B. G R A Y E N G I N E E R I N G I N C.

Pinellas County Stormwater Management Manual Training Workshop SMALL COMMERCIAL AREA CASE STUDY

WinSLAMM v 10 Theory and Practice

Concurrent Session B: LID Design Specifications (Chapter 4 in Draft Manual)

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table

Project: Developer/Designer: Reviewer:

January 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303)

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

APPENDIX L Hydrology and Stormwater Pond Analysis

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LID PLAN)

Hutchinson. Environmental Sciences Ltd. Preliminary Phosphorus Budget for the Proposed Redevelopment of the Canterbury Golf Course

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

Stantec Consulting Ltd Hagey Boulevard, Waterloo ON N2L 0A4

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

Dunpar Developments Inc.

Operation & Maintenance (OM) Manual v01. Bioretention Systems ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

SITE SERVICING PRELIMINARY DESIGN BRIEF

Section H - Site Plan Guidelines

Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587

Water Resources Management Plan Appendix B

Modelling and Analysis of EES Systems Using SWMM

Final Drainage Report

Model Results Operation and Maintenance (O& M) Results Cost-Benefit Analysis Results Conclusions

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 217 TORONTO STREET SOUTH MARKDALE, ONTARIO. Job No ENGINEERING REPORT. Prepared For:

Remediation and Treatment Technology Development and Support for DOE Oak Ridge Office: XPSWMM Model Configuration

Using WinSLAMM v10 to Predict Stormwater Pollutant Loads and Evaluate LID Management Approaches Overview

Attachment 1. Manufactured Treatment Device (MTD) Registration

GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING 84 Main Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887

Alternative Analysis Cherry Creek Reservoir West Boat Ramp Parking Lot Water Quality Improvements

Chapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification

Stormwater and LEED. Vancouver LEED User s Group May 27, Craig Kipkie, M.Sc., P.Eng, LEED AP

Conditional Interim Certification Findings

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS. The Stormwater Management StormFilter. Solutions Guide

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary

Philadelphia Water Department. Stormwater Regulations Update. BIA & Fox Rothschild LLP

North Allston Sub watershed Restoration Plan. Green Infrastructure Concept Plan and Strategies

Stormwater Management Report Bachman Terrace Residential Development

STORM WATER REPORT ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PLANTS JINKINSON SIDE ROAD, ASHTON CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR:

City of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. Drainage Guidelines for Residential Development

STORMFILTER THE MOST PROVEN. stormwater filtration system

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

968 St. Laurent Bulevard, Ottawa. Stormwater Management Report. Prepared for: Eric Haar Architect Inc.

Stormwater Drainage Criteria Manual. City Of Clearwater Engineering Department Effective July 1, 2015

CASE STUDIES: BMPTRAINS MODEL

Conservation Design Approach for New Development

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)

9220 Wightman Road, Suite 120 Montgomery Village, Maryland Phone Fax

NJ Future CSO Permittee Meeting

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS. low impact development application guide

Chapter 12 - Emerging Technologies

Appendix A. Compliance Calculator Guidance

4.4.6 Underground Detention

WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN TECHNICAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FINAL

LID PLANTER BOX MODELING

Section 1 - Introduction

Chapter 10 Infiltration Measures

PROPOSED FOOD STORE 150 TORONTO STREET SOUTH MARKDALE, ONTARIO. Job No ENGINEERING REPORT. Prepared For:

Landfill design General principles

D. B. G R A Y E N G I N E E R I N G I N C.

HOTEL KANATA 140 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts

ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST City of Mount Clemens

15A NCAC 02H.1005 STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS: COASTAL COUNTIES

STORM WATER REPORT ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PLANTS 891 JINKINSON SIDE ROAD, ASHTON CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR:

Hydrologic Assessment of LID Honda Campus, Markham, ON

Stormwater Disposal to Soakpits

Decatur, Georgia Stormwater Management Policy Guidelines. DRAFT November 5, 2014

New Retirement Home 6758 & 6766 Rocque Street Orleans, Ontario

Transcription:

APPENDIX D STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION AND INFILTRATION SIZING

Source: TRCA/CVC LID Plannign and Design Guide (Version 1.0)

Figure 4.10.5 Schematic of perforated pipe system integrated with a grass swale Source: Paul Wisner and Associates, 1994

Infiltration Sizing Canterbury GC Redevelopment Project Number: 1704 Date: September 2015 Designer: ETCK Amount Units Remarks Phosphorus Budget Infiltration Volume Required Total Site Area Total Average Annual Rainfall 758 mm Burketon McLaughlin, Ontario 1969-2001 Roof Areas to Soakaways Average roof area 223.9 m 2 Number of lots 124 Roof Area Drainage to Infiltration 27758.6 m 2 Rainfall depth to soakaway 20 mm Soakaway pit storage volume per lot 4.48 m 3 Total soakaway pit storage volume 555.2 m 3 Represents 90% of average annual rainfall volume, per Figure 1a from the Wet Weather Flow Guideline - City of Toronto Therefore, soakaways infiltrate 90% of average annual rainfall depth Total Annual rainfall on roofs 21041 m 3 Annual Rainfall infiltrated from roofs to soakaways 18937 m 3 Preliminary Soakaway Pit Sizing Per Lot Porosity Coefficient 0.4 Clear Stone Media Depth 1.0 m Width 2.5 m Length 3.2 m Provided Volume 3.20 m 3 Road Areas to Road Infiltration Trenches (Street E) Road right-of-way (ROW) area 0.57 ha per draft plan of subdivsiion Road right-of-way (ROW) length 240 m per draft plan of subdivsiion Average ROW imperviousness 75% Driveways, pavement, curbs, sidewalk ROW impervious area 4275 m 2 " Driveways outside of right-of-way 1116 m 2 31 lots with 6m x 6m driveways Total Impervious area to storm sewers 5391 m 2 Rainfall depth to road infiltration trenches 20 mm Total road infiltration trench storage volume 107.82 m 3 Therefore, road infiltration trenches will infiltrate 90% of average annual rainfall depth Total Annual rainfall (impervious areas to storm sewer) 4086 m 3 Represents 90% of average annual rainfall volume, per Figure 1a from the Wet Weather Flow Guideline - City of Toronto Annual Rainfall infiltrated from ROW to infiltration trenches 3678 m 3 rainfall event 90% of average annual rainfall since capturing 20 mm P:\1704 Geranium Simcoe Street Port Perry\Design\SWM\FSP\1704-p budget infiltration.xls

Infiltration Sizing Canterbury GC Redevelopment Project Number: 1704 Date: September 2015 Designer: ETCK Preliminary Road Infiltration Trench Sizing Required Infiltration trench volume per road length 0.45 m 3 /m Porosity Coefficient 0.4 Clear Stone Media Depth 1.20 m Width 1.0 m Length 1.0 m Provided Volume per road length 0.48 m 3 /m Road Areas to Road Infiltration Trenches (Street C Window Road Portion, Adjacent to Simcoe Road) Road right-of-way (ROW) area 0.4 ha per draft plan of subdivsiion Infiltration trench length 150 m Block 130 Average ROW imperviousness 75% Driveways, pavement, curbs, sidewalk ROW impervious area 3000 m 2 " Driveways outside of right-of-way 324 m 2 9 lots with 6m x 6m driveways Total Impervious area to storm sewers 3324 m 2 Rainfall depth to road infiltration trenches 20 mm Total road infiltration trench storage volume 66.5 m 3 Therefore, road infiltration trenches will infiltrate 90% of average annual rainfall depth Total Annual rainfall (impervious areas to storm sewer) 2520 m 3 Represents 90% of average annual rainfall volume, per Figure 1a from the Wet Weather Flow Guideline - City of Toronto Annual Rainfall infiltrated from ROW to infiltration trenches 2268 m 3 rainfall event 90% of average annual rainfall since capturing 20 mm Preliminary Road Infiltration Trench Sizing Required Infiltration trench volume per road length 0.44 m 3 /m Porosity Coefficient 0.4 Clear Stone Media Depth 1.20 m Width 1.0 m Length 1.0 m Provided Volume per road length 0.48 m 3 /m Road Areas to Road Infiltration Trenches (Street A Adjacent to lot 5) Road right-of-way (ROW) area 0.33 ha per draft plan of subdivsiion Infiltration trench length 40 m Adjacent to Lot 5 Average ROW imperviousness 75% Driveways, pavement, curbs, sidewalk ROW impervious area 2475 m 2 " Driveways outside of right-of-way 324 m 2 9 lots with 6m x 6m driveways Total Impervious area to storm sewers 2799 m 2 Rainfall depth to road infiltration trenches 20 mm Total road infiltration trench storage volume 55.98 m 3 Therefore, road infiltration trenches will infiltrate 90% of average annual rainfall depth Total Annual rainfall (impervious areas to storm sewer) 2122 m 3 Represents 90% of average annual rainfall volume, per Figure 1a from the Wet Weather Flow Guideline - City of Toronto Annual Rainfall infiltrated from ROW to infiltration trenches 1909 m 3 rainfall event 90% of average annual rainfall since capturing 20 mm Preliminary Road Infiltration Trench Sizing Required Infiltration trench volume per road length 1.40 m 3 /m Porosity Coefficient 0.4 Clear Stone Media Depth 2.00 m Width 1.8 m Length 1.0 m Provided Volume per road length 1.44 m 3 /m Total Annual Rainfall Volume Infiltrated 7855 m 3 budget) (Excludes soakaways, as already included in water P:\1704 Geranium Simcoe Street Port Perry\Design\SWM\FSP\1704-p budget infiltration.xls

Effective Drainage Area to Stormwater Filter Canterbury GC Redevelopment Project Number: 1704 Date: September 2015 Designer: ETCK Catchment 222b - To stormwater filter Total Catchment Area 4.41 ha Total Roof Area 1.29 ha (assumed roof area) Remaining Total Catchment Area 3.12 ha Of remaining Catchment Area: ROW Area 1.43 ha @ 75% impervious ROW Area 1.0725 impervious-ha Driveways + 0.2268 (63 driveways, 6 m x 6 m) 1.30 impervious-ha Weight Runoff Coefficeint for filter sizing Area C CxA Impervious Area 1.30 0.9 1.16937 Pervious Areas 1.82 0.2 0.36414 3.12 0.49 1.53351 P:\1704 Geranium Simcoe Street Port Perry\Design\SWM\FSP\1704-p budget infiltration.xls

Determining Number of Cartridges for Flow Based Systems Date 25/09/2015 Black Cells = Calculation Site Information Project Name Canterbury GC Redevelopment Project Location Port Perry, ON OGS ID MFS Drainage Area, Ad 7.71 ac (3.12 ha) Impervious Area, Ai 2.97 ac Pervious Area, Ap 4.74 % Impervious 39% Runoff Coefficient, Rc 0.50 Treatment storm flow rate, Q treat 1.99 cfs (56.4 L/s) Peak storm flow rate, Q peak TBD cfs Filter System Filtration brand MFS Cartridge height 22 in Specific Flow Rate 1.67 gpm/ft 2 Flow rate per cartridge 15.03 gpm SUMMARY Number of Cartridges 64 Media Type Perlite Annual TSS Removal 80% Percent Runoff Capture 90% Recommend (2) MFS814 vaults installed in parallel with bypass 2012 CONTECH Engineered Solutions conteches.com 200 Enterprise Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 Phone 877-907-8676 Fax 207-885-9825 1 of 1

FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT - BYPASS AND JUNCTION STRUCTURES MAY OR MAY NOT BE SUPPLIED BY CONTECH - MFS SYSTEM 5'-0" MIN. RECOMMENDED BYPASS MANHOLE JUNCTION MANHOLE BYPASS TO OUTFALL 5'-0" MIN. RECOMMENDED BYPASS WEIR LENGTH AND CREST ELEVATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC MFS SYSTEM ACTUAL ORIENTATION AND LAYOUT MAY VARY DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS MEDIA FILTRATION SYSTEM MFS THIS PRODUCT IS PROTECTED BY U.S. PATENT: 6,998,038; RELATED FOREIGN PATENTS, OR OTHER PATENTS PENDING. The design and information shown on this drawing is provided as a service to the project owner, engineer and contractor by Contech Engineered Solutions LLC ("Contech"). Neither this drawing, nor any part thereof, may be used, reproduced or modified in any manner without the prior written consent of Contech. Failure to comply is done at the user's own risk and Contech expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for such use. If discrepancies between the supplied information upon which the drawing is based and actual field conditions are encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for re-evaluation of the design. Contech accepts no liability for designs based on missing, incomplete or inaccurate information supplied by others. www.conteches.com 200 Enterprise Dr ive, Scar borough, ME 04074 877-907-8676 207-885-9830 207-885-9825 FAX TYPICAL PARALLEL BYPASS LAYOUT MFS STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM DATE: 3/25/15 SCALE: NONE PROJECT No.: SEQ. No.: N/A DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: ---

ECHELON ENVIRONMENTAL 505 HOOD ROAD UNIT 26 MARKHAM, ON L3R 5V6 P 905-948-0000 E info@echleonenvironmental.ca Annual TSS Removal Efficiency Using Historical Weather Data Area (ha) = 2.12 Engineer: SCS Consulting Group Ltd. C = 0.45 Contact: Erich Knechtel, P. Eng. Rational Conv. 2.775 converts from m3/s to l/s Report Date: 14-Sep-15 CDS Model: PMSU2025_5 Flowrate = 45 l/s Site: Canterbury GC Redevelopment Weather Station: 6158350 Location: Port Perry, ON PSD: FINE OGS ID: Area 3 Rainfall Intensity Range (mm/hr) Total Rainfall* (mm) Rainfall intensity mm/hr (I) Runoff Rate Per The Rational Method (l/s) Q = C x I x A x 2.77 Rainfall Volume % CDS Flow Rate (l/s) Operating Rate Efficiency** (%) Relative Efficiency (%) 0.0-0.5 620.70 0.5 1.3 7.3% 1.3 0.03 98.0 7.2 0.5-1.0 791.80 1.0 2.6 9.4% 2.6 0.06 97.2 9.1 1.0-1.5 809.20 1.5 4.0 9.6% 4.0 0.09 96.3 9.2 1.5-2.0 765.50 2.0 5.3 9.1% 5.3 0.12 95.5 8.7 2.0-2.5 546.70 2.5 6.6 6.5% 6.6 0.15 94.6 6.2 2.5-3.0 512.90 3.0 7.9 6.1% 7.9 0.18 93.8 5.7 3.0-4.0 840.50 4.0 10.6 10.0% 10.6 0.24 92.1 9.2 4.0-5.0 644.80 5.0 13.2 7.6% 13.2 0.29 90.4 6.9 5.0-6.0 505.30 6.0 15.9 6.0% 15.9 0.35 88.7 5.3 6.0-7.0 430.30 7.0 18.5 5.1% 18.5 0.41 87.1 4.4 7.0-8.0 302.10 8.0 21.2 3.6% 21.2 0.47 85.4 3.1 8.0-9.0 167.40 9.0 23.8 2.0% 23.8 0.53 83.7 1.7 9.0-10.0 275.00 10.0 26.5 3.3% 26.5 0.59 82.0 2.7 10.0-11.0 198.10 11.0 29.1 2.3% 29.1 0.65 80.3 1.8 11.0-12.0 160.70 12.0 31.8 1.9% 31.8 0.71 78.6 1.5 12.0-13.0 136.50 13.0 34.4 1.6% 34.4 0.76 76.9 1.2 13.0-15.0 150.10 15.0 39.7 1.8% 39.7 0.88 73.6 1.3 15.0-20.0 366.60 20.0 52.9 4.3% 45.0 1.00 59.7 2.6 20.0-25.0 70.80 25.0 66.2 0.8% 45.0 1.00 47.7 0.4 25.0-30.0 111.90 30.0 79.4 1.3% 45.0 1.00 39.8 0.5 30.0-35.0 0.00 35.0 92.7 0.0% 45.0 1.00 34.1 0.0 35.0-40.0 38.70 40.0 105.9 0.5% 45.0 1.00 29.8 0.1 8445.60 TSS Removal: 88.9% Efficiency Adjustment: 6.5% Net Annual TSS Removal: 82.4% Net Annual Volume Treated: 96.8% * Historical Data including years 1982 to 1998 from Ontario Climate Centre ** CDS Efficiency based on Washington Department of Ecology TAPE Water Quality Control Test Protocol *** Adjustment for use of 60 minute time step data on site with a time of concentration less than 30 minutes

ECHELON ENVIRONMENTAL 505 HOOD ROAD UNIT 26 MARKHAM, ON L3R 5V6 P 905-948-0000 E info@echleonenvironmental.ca Annual TSS Removal Efficiency Using Historical Weather Data Area (ha) = 7.92 Engineer: SCS Consulting Group Ltd. C = 0.45 Contact: Erich Knechtel, P. Eng. Rational Conv. 2.775 converts from m3/s to l/s Report Date: 24-Sep-15 CDS Model: PMSU4040_8 Flowrate = 170 l/s Site: Canterbury GC Redevelopment Weather Station: 6158350 Location: Port Perry, ON PSD: FINE OGS ID: Area 1 & 2 Rainfall Intensity Range (mm/hr) Total Rainfall* (mm) Rainfall intensity mm/hr (I) Runoff Rate Per The Rational Method (l/s) Q = C x I x A x 2.77 Rainfall Volume % CDS Flow Rate (l/s) Operating Rate Efficiency** (%) Relative Efficiency (%) 0.0-0.5 620.70 0.5 4.9 7.3% 4.9 0.03 98.0 7.2 0.5-1.0 791.80 1.0 9.9 9.4% 9.9 0.06 97.2 9.1 1.0-1.5 809.20 1.5 14.8 9.6% 14.8 0.09 96.4 9.3 1.5-2.0 765.50 2.0 19.8 9.1% 19.8 0.12 95.5 8.7 2.0-2.5 546.70 2.5 24.7 6.5% 24.7 0.15 94.7 6.2 2.5-3.0 512.90 3.0 29.7 6.1% 29.7 0.17 93.9 5.7 3.0-4.0 840.50 4.0 39.6 10.0% 39.6 0.23 92.2 9.2 4.0-5.0 644.80 5.0 49.5 7.6% 49.5 0.29 90.5 6.9 5.0-6.0 505.30 6.0 59.3 6.0% 59.3 0.35 88.9 5.3 6.0-7.0 430.30 7.0 69.2 5.1% 69.2 0.41 87.2 4.4 7.0-8.0 302.10 8.0 79.1 3.6% 79.1 0.47 85.5 3.1 8.0-9.0 167.40 9.0 89.0 2.0% 89.0 0.52 83.8 1.7 9.0-10.0 275.00 10.0 98.9 3.3% 98.9 0.58 82.2 2.7 10.0-11.0 198.10 11.0 108.8 2.3% 108.8 0.64 80.5 1.9 11.0-12.0 160.70 12.0 118.7 1.9% 118.7 0.70 78.8 1.5 12.0-13.0 136.50 13.0 128.6 1.6% 128.6 0.76 77.2 1.2 13.0-15.0 150.10 15.0 148.4 1.8% 148.4 0.87 73.8 1.3 15.0-20.0 366.60 20.0 197.8 4.3% 170.0 1.00 60.3 2.6 20.0-25.0 70.80 25.0 247.3 0.8% 170.0 1.00 48.3 0.4 25.0-30.0 111.90 30.0 296.7 1.3% 170.0 1.00 40.2 0.5 30.0-35.0 0.00 35.0 346.2 0.0% 170.0 1.00 34.5 0.0 35.0-40.0 38.70 40.0 395.6 0.5% 170.0 1.00 30.2 0.2 8445.60 TSS Removal: 89.0% Efficiency Adjustment: 6.5% Net Annual TSS Removal: 82.5% Net Annual Volume Treated: 96.8% * Historical Data including years 1982 to 1998 from Ontario Climate Centre ** CDS Efficiency based on Washington Department of Ecology TAPE Water Quality Control Test Protocol *** Adjustment for use of 60 minute time step data on site with a time of concentration less than 30 minutes