The University of Georgia

Similar documents
The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

An Analysis of Historical Trends in the Farmgate Report. Brigid A. Doherty and John C. McKissick (1) Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development

The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

FS February, 2001 PRODUCER ACCEPTANCE OF A NEW PEANUT MARKETING COOPERATIVE: A SURVEY OF GEORGIA PEANUT PRODUCERS

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The University of Georgia

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

Evans County Cooperative Extension

Washington County Cooperative Extension February, 2011 by: and Economic Development. and Environmental Sciences The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

Peanut Production Update

AN ECONOMIC DESCRIPTION OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN LYON COUNTY

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BROILER LITTER APPLICATION TO SELECTED ROW CROPS IN SOUTHWEST GEORGIA

AgSnapshots The University of Georgia Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development s focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

2O16 MISSISSIPPI. agriculture, forestry and natural resources

Cogongrass in Georgia An EDRR Success. Dave Moorhead, University of Georgia Mark McClure, James Johnson, Chip Bates, Georgia Forestry Commission

Lesson 42. Agriculture in Texas TEXAS ALMANAC TEACHERS GUIDE. Principal Crops Vegetable Crops Fruits & Nuts. A mature wheat field in Texas.

Trends in Organic Production

Poultry production is the number one agricultural

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

Pearl River Basin Symposium. MS Museum of Natural Science Jackson, MS

The University of Georgia

NOIA s mission is to secure reliable access to the nation s valuable. and supplied in an environmentally responsible manner.

Income tax deductions for hurricane-damaged timber losses

Agriculture in Marion, Polk, and Yamhill Counties

AGRICULTURAL WATER CONSUMPTION IN THE ACT/ACF RIVER BASINS: APPROACHES FOR PROJECTING IRRIGATED ACREAGE AND AMOUNTS

Characteristics of Indiana Vegetable Farmers

AN ECONOMIC DESCRIPTION OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN PERSHING COUNTY

The Importance of Agriculture and its Transportation Issues

Economic Contribution of the Wheat Industry to North Dakota

POLICY ANALYSIS REPORT

2018 Crop Enterprise Budgets

2019 Crop Enterprise Budgets

Economic Impact of Florida's Fruit and Vegetable Industries 1

2017 Crop Market Outlook

PERMANENT PLANTINGS 4 TULARE COLLEGE CENTER

The Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture

Cogongrass in Georgia Winter 2018 Update Cogongrass Eradication Efforts Continue to Show Positive Gains in spots 107 spots 152 spots

Simulating Crop Rotations in the Coastal Plain with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2

2009 JOURNAL OF THE ASFMRA

The Status of Alabama Agriculture

2012 UGA Uniform Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program

The University of Georgia

Feed Grain Outlook. May 10, 2017 Volume 26, Number 25

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2016 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture. DeDe Jones Steven Klose

Peanut Producers Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Alternative Marketing Institutions

AG TRANS: Case Study Figure Captions

inside 3 Arkansas economy is on solid ground Arkansas counts on agriculture Total impact Bringing in the harvest The Value Added advantage

Global Warming and Water: Some Side-Effects

Agriculture Media Planning Guide. August 2018

To Certify or Not to Certify: How marketplace relationships affect the adoption of organic certification by fruit and vegetable farmers

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2012 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture

Table 1 Declining number of farms with chickens, increasing cash receipts, Year Farms Cash receipts for with chickens* chickens and

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms Case Studies of Texas High. Plains Agriculture

Crop Progress. Special Note

CLARK COUNTY AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN I. OVERVIEW OF COUNTY

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2018 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture

Considerable change is occurring in Georgia s agriculture.

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up 32 Percent from September 2016 Soybean Stocks Up 53 Percent All Wheat Stocks Down 11 Percent

Clay County Comprehensive Plan for Agriculture

1. What did George Washington Carver develop that greatly impacted agriculture?

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Magic Valley Economy, 2010

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO ESTIMATE THE IMPACT OF IRRIGATION WATER SHORTAGES ON RIO GRANDE VALLEY AGRICULTURE

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2016 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

National Agricultural Statistics Service Overview

Overview of the NASS Nuts and Pecan Estimating Program. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service New Orleans, LA February 18, 2011

The Importance of Irrigated Crop Production to the Texas High Plains Economy. Authors

GEORGIA. Employment & Wages Averages. Mark Butler, Commissioner

Feed Grain Outlook June 2, 2014 Volume 23, Number 33

The University of Georgia

2013 UGA Uniform Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program

Trends for Arkansas Field Crop Yields, AG -2071

Cash Rental Rates for Iowa

The cash rental rate information presented

ACE 427 Spring Lecture 9. USDA Crop Reports. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

Land Values 2013 Summary

TRANSFORMING U.S. FARM POLICY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

Agricultural Population Growth Marginal as Nonagricultural Population Soars

Outlook for the 2014 U.S. Farm Economy. Kevin Patrick Farm Economy Branch Resource and Rural Economics Division

Economic Impact of Agriculture and Agribusiness in Miami-Dade County, Florida

Economic Contribution of the Soybean Industry in North Dakota

LAUREL COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

HENDERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Winter Wheat Seedings

Transcription:

The University of Georgia Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences The Economic Importance of Agriculture in the Eighteen County Flint River Basin of Georgia Brigid A. Doherty and John C. McKissick CR-00-06 February 2000

This report reviews the economic impacts of agriculture in the Flint River Basin of Southwestern Georgia. Agricultural production in the eighteen Georgia counties considered in this report is 1 dependent on irrigation. It is of interest to policy makers and citizens of Georgia to examine how agriculture affects the economic base of these counties and thus explore the economic role of irrigation. Agriculture in Georgia The food, fiber and related industries sector in Georgia accounts for 16 percent of total 2 output and 15 percent of total employment making it the largest single sector in the economy. Farm and forest production sectors directly employed 87,269 people in 1995 and created $6.5 billion in output (Kriesel and Jones). Clearly, agriculture in Georgia is a significant portion of the state economy. Certain commodities form a strong base for agricultural activities in Georgia. The top value generators in Georgia agriculture have historically been broilers, Source: 1998 Farmgate Value Report 1 These counties are: Baker, Calhoun, Colquitt, Crisp, Decatur, Dooly, Dougherty, Early, Grady, Lee, Miller, Mitchell, Randolph, Seminole, Sumter, Terrell, Turner and Worth. 2 Includes agricultural production, processing and wholesale and retail food sales. 1

forestry, cotton, peanuts and vegetables. These five commodities represented 67 percent of total farmgate value in 1998. Cotton and peanuts alone were 12 percent of farmgate value. Agriculture in the Flint River Basin The eighteen counties in the Flint River Basin (FRB) contribute roughly 18 percent of agricultural value to the state s total (see table 1). The FRB region also contains 36 percent of total harvested crop acres in Georgia (1997 Census of Ag). More importantly, the FRB counties are major contributors to the production of row crops in Georgia. These counties produce more than 40 percent of Georgia s value in corn, cotton, peanuts and vegetables. The FRB counties are responsible for producing nearly 60 percent of the peanut value in Georgia. In addition, about 30 percent of fruit and nut production originates from this region. 2

Source of Charts 2 and 3: 1998 Farmgate Value Report 3

The figures above account only for the income received by producers for agricultural commodities. Impact analysis is a method that accounts for the total economic contribution of a sector to the economy. Producers in the FRB received $1.4 billion for their agricultural products in 1998. As a result of their activities, a total of $2.6 billion of output was created in Georgia. In other words, had these agricultural activities in the FRB not occurred, Georgia would have lost $2.6 billion in economic activity. In addition, agriculture in the FRB provides over 25,000 jobs in Georgia. Focusing on row crops, economic impact analysis shows that removing $1 of cotton output would reduce total economic activity by $1.89 and removing $1 of peanut output would reduce economic activity by $1.83 (Kriesel and Jones). This amount only accounts for the activity generated by the farmer purchasing his inputs. It does not measure the value further generated in Georgia by processing the product. A dollar reduction in cotton production would also have serious impacts on cotton ginning, warehousing for storage, and so forth. These figures show that removing cotton and peanut production will have an effect beyond decreasing the amount of value received by the producer. 4

Source of Charts 4 and 5: 1997 Census of Agriculture 5

Irrigation and Agriculture in the Flint River Basin Producers in the FRB rely on irrigation as an integral input into the production of row crops. The 18 county region represents 36 percent of the state s total harvested crop acreage but has 54 percent of the total irrigated acreage in the state (see table 2). Roughly 30 percent of total harvested crop land in the 18 counties is irrigated. In certain counties, irrigated acres are almost 50 percent of total harvested crop land (1997 Census of Ag). Certain crops tend to be more highly irrigated. In Georgia, between 40 and 50 percent of all cotton and peanut crops receive irrigation and almost all commercial vegetables (Givan, et al). Conclusions This report has demonstrated the economic importance of agriculture in the eighteen counties of the Flint River Basin. The major commodities of this agricultural production are crops including cotton, peanuts and vegetables. These crops are in turn relatively dependent on irrigation. This is reflected in the high amounts of land irrigated in the region. Through this reasoning, it is clear that irrigation contributes to the economic health of the Flint River Basin region. 6

References st Givan, Willam et al. Georgia Agriculture in the 21 Century. Cooperative Extension Service. Agricultural and Applied Economics. The University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia. August 1999. Kriesel, Warren and Yngrid Jones. The Economic Importance of the Food and Fiber Sectors in the Georgia State Economy. Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development. Agriculture and Applied Economics. The University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia. November 1998. Rickett, Anna, Brigid A. Doherty and Jeffrey H. Dorfman. 1998 Georgia Farmgate Value Report. Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development. Agriculture and Applied Economics. The University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia. July 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington DC. June 1999. 7

8

9

10

The Center for Agribusiness & Economic Development The Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development is a unit of the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences of the University of Georgia, combining the missions of research and extension. The Center has among its objectives: To provide feasibility and other short term studies for current or potential Georgia agribusiness firms and/or emerging food and fiber industries. To provide agricultural, natural resource, and demographic data for private and public decision makers. To find out more, visit our Web site at: http://www.caed.uga.edu Or contact: John McKissick, Director Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development Lumpkin House The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 30602-7509 Phone (706)542-0760 caed@agecon.uga.edu The University of Georgia and Fort Valley State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. An equal opportunity/affirmative action organization committed to a diverse work force. CR-00-06 February 2000 Issued in furtherance of Cooperation Extension Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, the University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. J. Scott Angle, Dean and Director