Donner Summit Public Utility District Wastewater Treatment Plant Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) Work Plan

Similar documents
WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY REDUCTION GUIDANCE

BIOMONITORING REQUIREMENTS 48-HOUR ACUTE BIOMONITORING REQUIREMENTS: FRESHWATER

Researc n. Burlingto TOXICITY REDUCTION EVALUATION PHASE I PROPOSAL CITY OF HENDERSON JANUARY 1995

Integrated Planning for Meeting Clean Water Act Requirements

MACTIER WASTEWATER TREATMENT 2016 SUMMARY REPORT

Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Report NPDES Permit Program

Water Quality Control Division. Biomonitoring Guidance Document

Ceriodaphnia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Report NPDES Permit Program

2016 Industrial Waste Pretreatment Seminar A "How To" Guide for Pretreatment. November 2, 2016

Permit Issues Forum White Paper

Executive Order on Enforcing Regulatory Reform Agenda SCAP Correspondence regarding Burdensome NPDES Permit Requirements

Upper Blackstone Water Pollution Abatement District

PERMIT LIMITS, LEVELS AND MONITORING DEFINITIONS

Cyanide Concentration Changes in Environmental Water Samples as a Function of Sample Preservation, and Holding Time

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY LANSING DISTRICT OFFICE. February 20, 2018

TEMPLATE Operational Plan for a Hazardous Waste Management Facility

(B) The following exceptions apply to paragraph (A) of this rule.:

TRE ACTIVITIES REPORT ALMATIS INC. OUTFALL 001 (NPDES PERMIT NO. AR ) 4th QUARTER 2010

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NARRATIVE STANDARD FOR TOXICITY IN DISCHARGE PERMITS USING WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TESTING

BRACEBRIDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Industrial Storm Water Permit TXR Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Worksheet Instructions

Radioactive Water Treatment at a United States. John C Beckman, US Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, Baltimore, MD 21201

Knowledge, Skills Abilities -- Gap Analysis Tool

Public Notice. Issuance of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit

CHLORITE, BROMATE, AND CHLORINE DIOXIDE MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT

BRACEBRIDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT 2016 SUMMARY REPORT

Effluent Guidelines and Water Quality Management - Program 56

FACT SHEET. Owners/Operators of Splash Pads located in the State of Oklahoma

Description of Facility and Activities Generating Discharge

Paper 5. Sanitary Sewer Overflow Peak Excess Flow Treatment Facility Options Paper. I. State/EPA Efforts to Address Sanitary Sewer Overflows

Bitterroot River Nutrient TMDL Technical Report WASTEWATER TREATMENT

APPENDIX C ADEQ CHECKLIST FOR 208 PLAN AMENDMENTS

Any questions or clarifications regarding the Industrial Release Limits Policy document may be directed to:

COMPLYING WITH YOUR INDUSTRIAL PRE-TREATMENT PERMIT INDIANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONFERENCE OCTOBER 24, 2017 PERMIT AGENDA

PORT SEVERN WASTEWATER TREATMENT 2016 SUMMARY REPORT

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION WATER RESOURCES DIVISION CHAPTER PRIORITY RANKING SYSTEM

CHAPTER 6 SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

6.13 Utilities and Service Systems

Essential Pretreatment program knowledge and requirements in accordance with 40 CFR 403

Chapter 5 Regulatory Coordination and Compliance

Pretreatment and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System: Toxic Organics Management Plan

Albany County Water Purification District (District) Mercury Minimization Program Policy

DEQ Form Oct 18, Part A: Operator Information and Certification. DEQ Authorization Number: OKR10

GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS REPORTS

A Class I Permit is issued to any user who meets any one of the following conditions:

Public Notice. Issuance of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit

SSO- WDR Compliance Workshop Electronic Reporting: Reporting Requirements & Tips. Sewer System Management Plan Chapter

Rulemaking Hearing Rules of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation State Revolving Fund Loan Program

IPR Case Studies and Issues for DPR

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Policy No Draft Div Pol Yr

Supplemental Environmental Project: Third Party Monitoring of discharge from the King America Finishing Wastewater treatment plant

Ammonia Water Quality Criteria Past, Present and Future

NPDES COMPLIANCE MONITORING STRATEGY AND ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION PLAN OCTOBER 1, SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

A. Narrative Statement

Davenport Water Pollution Control Pretreatment Office Elements of a Slug/Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan

ARTICLE 6 SPECIAL PERMITS FOR SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USERS INTO TOWN'S WASTEWATER SYSTEM

Industrial Water Conservation and EPA s Effluent Guidelines

Stormwater Outreach for Regional Municipalities (STORM) Overview. Maintaining an Updated SWPPP Site Map Required Elements Good Examples Bad Examples

Environment: Public Drinking Water Supply Program

Fact Sheet for Order No. R February 9, 2005 Scripps Institution of Oceanography

JULY 2012 FLSA: NON-EXEMPT

OVERVIEW OF POTW PRETREATMENT PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

Water Quality Control Permits for Aquatic Herbicides

August 19, Subject: IBT Report for Dear Ms. Nimmer:

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A WATER ALLOCATION PERMIT APPLICATION

California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region

Dynamic Pollution Prevention Proaram

2016 Multi-Sector General Permit Annual Report - NTESS

CHAPTER 2 WASTEWATER REGULATORY ISSUES

Clean Water Act Industrial Stormwater Applicability Flowchart. July 2009

Richland County Industrial and High Risk Runoff Program. Alan Trim BP Barber

EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH MUNICIPALITY INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER

City of Laguna Beach AGENDA BILL No. Meeting Date: 11/6/01 WASTEWATER GREASE CONTROL POLICY SUMMARY OF THE MATTER:

Pretreatment Streamlining Rule

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL DISCHARGE APPROVAL

RENEWAL OF FDEP FACILITY PERMITS: THE PRETREATMENT PERSPECTIVE

Summary of Issues Strategies Benefits & Costs Key Uncertainties Additional Resources

CITY OF SIOUX FALLS ADMINISTRATIVE RULES. Chapter 77 Public Works / Water Reclamation. Article 77:01 INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM

City of Palo Alto 2016 Public Health Goals Report

FACT SHEET FOR 2 nd DRAFT GENERAL PERMIT NO. ARG590000, CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFO) IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS

Elements of a Biosolids Management Program

Module 3.1 Pollution Prevention

City of Westbrook DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, ENGINEERING & CODE ENFORCEMENT

Wastewater Treatment Works and Collections System Annual Report Year 2005 General Information

Monitoring Quality of Wastewater and Storm Water Data Dealing with Multiple Permits, States, and Analytical Laboratories

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NARRATIVE STANDARD FOR TOXICITY IN DISCHARGE PERMITS USING WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TESTING

City of Guelph Transfer of Review Procedures 7 March, 2017

MS4 NPDES Permit Stormwater Management Plan for Clackamas County Service District No. 1 and the City of Happy Valley.

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Wawa Drinking Water System

Communities Addressing Chloride Case Study: Marshall, MN

City of Ames. Water Pollution Control. Long Range Facility Plan

Stormwater CGP. CGP Regulatory Overview. CGP Regulatory Overview

SEWER SERVICE CHARGES

Chapter Nine, Potable Water Subelement City of St. Petersburg Comprehensive Plan

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

RI Municipal WWTF Total Residual Chlorine Limits History and Status

Director of Compliance Report. October 18, Plant Loading and Operations Summary September 2017

Transcription:

Wastewater Treatment Plant Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) Work Plan OVERVIEW In Waste Discharge Requirements for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (Order No. R5-2009-0034, NPDES No. CA0081621), the District is required to submit to the Regional Water Board a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) Work Plan for approval by the Executive Officer (EO). This document has been produced to fulfill the TRE Work Plan requirement contained in Special Provision VI.C.2.a.i of the Order. REGULAR CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING The Order, in Attachment E, Section V.B, contains chronic toxicity testing requirements. These requirements specify that quarterly effluent three species chronic toxicity testing is required to determine whether the effluent is contributing chronic toxicity to the receiving water. Chronic toxicity testing is required to be performed using 100% effluent and the dilution series shown in Attachment E, Table E-4 of the Order. In addition, two controls are required using 100% receiving water and 100% laboratory water. If toxicity is found in any effluent test, the District will re-sample and re-test within 14 days of receiving notification of a test failure, as specified in Attachment E, Section V.B.8 of the Order. ACCELERATED MONITORING AND TRE INITIATION As specified in Special Provision VI.C.2.a.ii of the Order, the District is required to initiate accelerated monitoring when the numeric toxicity monitoring trigger of one chronic toxic unit (1 TUc) is exceeded during regular effluent chronic toxicity monitoring, and the testing meets all test acceptability criteria. The TUc value is determined by dividing 100 by the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC). If the toxicity trigger is exceeded during regular effluent chronic toxicity monitoring, the following protocol will be used for accelerated monitoring and TRE initiation: 1. Within 14 days of notification of a test result that exceeds the numeric toxicity monitoring trigger, accelerated monitoring will be initiated. Accelerated monitoring will consist of four chronic toxicity tests in a six-week period (i.e., one test every two weeks) using the species that exhibited toxicity. If the results of four consecutive accelerated monitoring tests do not exceed the monitoring trigger, accelerated monitoring will be discontinued. 2. If the source of toxicity is easily identified (i.e. temporary plant upset), corrections will be made to the Facility, if appropriate, and accelerated monitoring continued DONN09-003 1 September 2009

until four consecutive accelerated test results are reported at levels that do not exceed the monitoring trigger. 3. If the result of any accelerated toxicity test exceeds the monitoring trigger, accelerated monitoring will be discontinued and a TRE initiated to investigate the cause of toxicity and to identify corrective actions to reduce or eliminate effluent toxicity. Within 30 days of notification by the laboratory of an accelerated monitoring test result exceeding the monitoring trigger, the District is required to submit a TRE Action Plan to the Regional Water Board. The TRE Action Plan will include the following items: Specific actions the District will take to investigate and identify the cause of toxicity and a monitoring schedule; Specific actions the District will take to mitigate the impact of the discharge and prevent the recurrence of toxicity; and A schedule of these actions. Within 60 days of notification by the laboratory of accelerated monitoring test results exceeding the monitoring trigger, the District is required to submit to the Regional Water Board a TRE Work Plan for approval by the Executive Officer. The TRE Work Plan will outline the procedures for identifying the source or sources of toxicity and procedures for reducing or elimination effluent toxicity. TRE COMPONENTS The following phased TRE approach will be used to identify and reduce or eliminate the source or sources of effluent toxicity. The TRE components presented below are consistent with Toxicity Reduction Evaluation for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, USEPA August 1999. 1. INFORMATION AND DATA ACQUISITION When the toxicity monitoring trigger of 1 TUc is exceeded during regular effluent chronic toxicity monitoring, the first step will include a thorough review of the laboratory report by a qualified individual. This thorough review will include a check for laboratory reporting errors and a check to confirm that all test methods were conducted according to appropriate protocol. Additionally, results from the laboratory controls, associated with the toxicity test, will be carefully evaluated. Additional data and information from the laboratory may be necessary in order to complete these thorough reviews. Subsequent to verification of the laboratory data report(s), sample collection and handling procedures will be reviewed and evaluated to determine if the potential for sample contamination existed. If any sampling concerns are identified, appropriate corrections to sampling procedures and/or equipment will be implemented prior to the initiation of required accelerated monitoring. DONN09-003 2 September 2009

2. FACILITY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Operations and performance data will be reviewed, including the review of results from routine effluent water quality sampling conducted within the same time frame as toxicity sampling. These data will be evaluated and compared to historical data to determine if elevated concentrations of potentially toxic constituents existed. If a treatment deficiency is causing noncompliance with an NPDES effluent limit, studies will be conducted to evaluate treatment modifications before proceeding further with the TRE. If Facility performance is not determined to be a cause of toxicity, the District will move forward with Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) procedures. In addition to the review of plant performance, a review of collection system operations will be conducted for the purpose of determining if any new dischargers or maintenance anomalies correlate with effluent toxicity. 3. TOXICITY IDENTIFICATION EVALUATION If the District is required to move forward with TIE procedures, District staff will conduct sample collection and coordinate with a qualified contract toxicity laboratory, which will implement USEPA TIE procedures. The generic TIE protocol is performed in three phases: Toxicity characterization, toxicant identification, and toxicant confirmation. 4. TOXICITY SOURCE EVALUATION A toxicity source evaluation involves the sampling and analysis of wastewater at strategic locations within the collection system. One of two types of source evaluation studies will be performed: Chemical tracking or toxicity-based tracking. 5. TOXICITY CONTROL EVALUATION Using the results from TRE elements 1 through 4 above, alternatives for effluent toxicity reduction will be identified and the most feasible approach will be selected for implementation. Effluent toxicity may be controlled through collection system discharge restrictions or in-plant treatment modifications or additions. Several control methods may be required to achieve the desired toxicity reduction. 6. TOXICITY CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION The toxicity control method or technology will be implemented and follow-up monitoring conducted to ensure TRE objectives are met. DONN09-003 3 September 2009

TREATMENT EFFICIENCY & GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES Good housekeeping practices are implemented in order to maximize in-house treatment efficiency and minimize the potential for toxicity. These methods and practices are summarized below: All hazardous chemical storage areas include secondary containment; Efforts are made to keep chemical usage quantities at the facility to a minimum; A sewer use ordinance is in place to control wastewater discharges; and An ongoing collection system maintenance program is in place, which reduces the potential for accumulation of contaminants within the system which could upset the Facility. CHEMICALS USED IN FACILITY OPERATION The following chemicals are used in the operation of the wastewater treatment facility Chlorine gas, Sulfur Dioxide gas, Ammonia Anhydros Soda Ash, Methanol, Cationic Polymer, and Alum Solution liquid. DONN09-003 4 September 2009

Attachment A Accelerated Monitoring Flow Chart

Accelerated Monitoring Flow Chart DONN09-003 A-1 September 2009