The IDHS obtained data from representative samples of ever-married women and currently married men to:

Similar documents
WATER SUPPLY OF JAKARTA

Implementation Status & Results Indonesia Third Water Supply and Sanitation for Low Income Communities Project (P085375)

INDONESIA SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC INDICATOR

NUSANTARA REPORT. Review of Regional Economic and Finance JULI 2013

TACKLING REGIONAL DISPARITY THROUGH LOCAL INITIATIVES

Analysis Of Micro And Small Industry Development In Indonesia

Fisheries and Aquaculture Forum (10AFAF) Aquaculture in Asia (CAA4) in Yeosu, The paper is presented in 10 th Asian

SURVEY DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

Sustainable urban sanitation and hygiene

BP REDD+ REDD+ Management Agency: Operational Strategy

Ministry of Village, Development of Disadvantaged Region, and Transmigration SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITY OF EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH VILLAGES

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/WP2/WD(2018)16

Populasi URBANIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA: DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVES ANALYSIS

DEFORESTATION NDONESIA S COMMITMENT IN ACHIEVING MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ZEROI

Additional information on calculating the emission factors of Indonesia for the JCM. Table 1 Grid emission factor PV Case 1 and Case 2

1 Urban Sector Review

FinScope Methodology

Bangladesh - CGAP Smallholder Household Survey 2016, Building the Evidence Base on The Agricultural and Financial Lives of Smallholder Households

SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository (SAIR)

Chapter Competitiveness Ranking and Simulation Study for 33 Indonesian Provinces: An Annual Update

DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT REALIZATION IN QUARTER II AND JANUARY JUNE 2017

INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATASHEET APPRAISAL STAGE

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM IN REGIONAL AUTONOMY ERA

THE IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON GDPPER CAPITA IN PROVINCES OF INDONESIA

Proposed Results-Based Loan Republic of Indonesia: Integrated Participatory Development and Management of Irrigation Program

Economic corridor of industrial development in Indonesia

Horticulture Household Survey

DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT REALIZATION

Implementation Status & Results Indonesia Third Water Supply and Sanitation for Low Income Communities Project (P085375)

DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT REALIZATION IN QUARTER IV AND JANUARY DECEMBER 2017

The Comparative Analysis of Accessibility Index Value of Government Internet Financial Reporting In Indonesia

Regulation and Development of New and Renewable Energy in Indonesia

Metropolitan Proposals for an Exhausted World

Keywords: Indonesia; Infrastructure; Provincial capitals; Rank; Transportation

IN INDONESIA LESSONS FROM THE FIELD

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIAN REGIONS: TOWARDS AN ASSESSMENT

July Impact of Environmental Polluted and Environmental Degradation, Climate Change

エカジュリアファド * 目黒公郎 ** ** 郷右近英臣 Eka JULIAFAD, Kimiro MEGURO and Hideomi GOKON. Population Growth in Padang City

Quantitative Analysis of Indonesia s Short- and Long-term Development Strategies *

Aquatic Emergency Preparedness and Response System: INDONESIA

Indonesia. Grain and Feed Update. Indonesia Grain and Feed Update July 2013

5. The East Asian Experience: Indonesia

1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE COUNTRY

Keynote Speech. Integrating Population Dynamics into Urban Development Plans: Sustainable Cities, Human Mobility and International Migration

Rural road in Indonesia: Issues and challenges

BANK LOAN, INFLATION, AND FARMERS WELFARE: DATA ANALYSIS BY PROVINCE IN INDONESIA

Consolidation and Change: The Indonesian Parliament after the 2004 Elections

TECHNICAL EVALUATION (2012) PNPM MANDIRI RURAL INFRASTUCTURE: SUMMARY SERIES.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Republic of Indonesia Electricity Investment Opportunity In Indonesia Economic Development Corridors

A Comparative Analysis of Domestic Patent Applications of South-East Asian Countries using Harschman-Herfindahl Index

Chapter 1 Overview Competitiveness Analysis and Development Strategies for 33 Indonesian Provinces

Waste to Energy Status in Indonesia

Export Download View citation overview View Cited by More...

POLICY ON SOLAR AND BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA

What other databases and measurements are out there? Sabina Alkire, ESCAP, October 2017

WOMEN IN GEOTHERMAL. Click to edit Master subtitle style MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES

INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET ADDITIONAL FINANCING

Pertiwi Andarani Dept. of Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering, University of Diponegoro (UNDIP) Semarang, Indonesia

Indonesian Approach to Enhance the SMEs Empowerment in Practicing Food Safety Standards

TEMPLATE FOR NERITIC TUNAS STATISTIC DATA

CHAPTER 2 GETTING STARTED

Regional Clinical Trial in Indonesia: Challenging yet Promising. Marlinang D Siburian

Rural Areas Infrastructure Development Project

Energy Poverty. Jeffrey Haeni USAID/EGAT/I&E. Infrastructure Workshop

Food Security Monitoring Bulletin INDONESIA. Special Focus: Food security in 100 districts prioritized for reduction of stunting

Cassava Price Competitiveness and Cultivation Interest

National Council on Climate Change Indonesia. Registered CDM Projects Average Annual. Review N. of. Total ERs by Amount of Issued

Ethiopia - Socioeconomic Survey

Revitalizing Irrigation in Indonesia

MAIN REPORT of SOCIO ECONOMIC BASELINE SURVEY (SEBS) AND PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL (PRA)

Regional Areas Infrastructure Development Project (II)

RAPID ILORIN. Building a Future of Quality, A Happy People, A Happy City of Ilorin.

Legal Review: INDONESIAN DECENTRALIZATION: EVALUATION, RECENT MOVEMENT AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES 1

FoKSBI and The NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL

Food Security Monitoring Bulletin. Food Security Monitoring Bulletin INDONESIA. Special focus:food Affordability and Ramadan. Volume 6, April 2017

Local Impacts of Resource Shocks Three quantitative case studies from Indonesia

Renewable Energy. Development Plan. Presented in Japan-Indonesia Business Forum for Energy Efficiency, Conservation and Renewable Energy

An Analysis Of Small Industry Development Of Malay Woven Cloth In Province Of Riau

In Cooperation with. Gesellscha ft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit

Ethiopia - Rural Socioeconomic Survey

Gender Issues in Fisheries and Aquaculture in Lao PDR

Indonesia: Sumatra Floods

Nigeria - CGAP Smallholder Household Survey 2016, Building the Evidence Base on the Agricultural and Financial Lives of Smallholder Households

Indonesia Sustainable Welfare Index (ISWI)

INDONESIAN. Exploration & Development. Indonesian Geothermal. Opportunities. March Asia Pacific Edition EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST.

REPORT GHS SITUATION / GAP ANALYSIS

Session 4.2: Sampling Designs for Horticulture Surveys

MataKami bridges the rural BIG DATA gap

Protection Forest and Improving local community income through forest honey. Presented by Hermanto Forest Honey Network Indonesia (JMH)

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics Economic Statistics Directorate

Date: September 24, 2018 Ref.: RFQ Subject: Request for Quotations for Conducting Two Sets of Surveys in Ukraine

Lowongan Kerja NGO OXFAM Indonesia Project Manager (AIP PRISMA project Better Value Market for Crude Coconut Oil) Ende Flores

Vol. 7, Issue, 10, pp , October, Research Article

HOW TO PROMOTE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION: INDONESIA s CASE

FINAL RESULTS REPORT: WOMEN S TIME SAVINGS FROM INDONESIA DOMESTIC BIOGAS PROGRAMME BIOGAS (IDBP)

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT TO INCREASE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ( Indonesian Experiences)

CHAPTER 2 VALUE PROPOSITION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Impact of Icts Development on Economic Growth in Indonesia

Indonesia: Sumatra Floods

Transcription:

SURVEY DESIGN Appendix B B.1 INTRODUCTION The 2002-2003 IDHS obtained data from representative samples of ever-married women 15-49 and currently married men 15-54 to: estimate demographic rates, particularly fertility and under-five mortality rates; measure the level of contraceptive knowledge and practice look at key child health indicators including the level of immunizations; the prevalence and treatment of diarrhea and other diseases; and child feeding practices; assess the coverage of maternity care services; explore men s involvement in reproductive health; investigate the direct and indirect determinants that influence the maternal and child health situation. The survey provides estimates at the national and provincial level for all of the above indicators. In each of the five districts in Central Java and the five districts in East Java which are covered in the Safe Motherhood Project, the sample was expanded to allow for estimates with acceptable precision for all of the main variables derived from the household and individual woman interviews. B.2 SAMPLE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION Administratively, Indonesia is divided into 30 provinces. Each province is subdivided into districts (regency in areas mostly rural and municipality in urban areas). Districts are subdivided into subdistricts and each subdistrict is divided into villages. The entire village is classified as urban or rural. The primary objective of the 2002-2003 IDHS is to provide estimates with acceptable precision for the following domains: Indonesia as a whole; Each of 26 provinces covered in the survey. The four provinces excluded due to political instability are Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, Maluku, North Maluku and Papua. These provinces cover 4 percent of the total population. Urban and rural areas of Indonesia; Each of the five districts in Central Java and the five districts in East Java covered in the Safe Motherhood Project (SMP), to provide information for the monitoring and evaluation of the project. These districts are: in Central Java: Cilacap, Rembang, Jepara, Pemalang, and Brebes. in East Java: Trenggalek, Jombang, Ngawi, Sampang and Pamekasan. Appendix B 267

The census blocks (CBs) are the primary sampling unit for the 2002-2003 IDHS. CBs were formed during the preparation of the 2000 Population Census. Each CB includes approximately 80 households. In the master sample frame, the CBs are grouped by province, by regency/municipality within a province, and by subdistricts within a regency/municipality. In rural areas, the CBs in each district are listed by their geographical location. In urban areas, the CBs are distinguished by the urban classification (large, medium and small cities) in each subdistrict. BPS-Statistics Indonesia (BPS) maintains the list of CBs, which is used as a frame to draw samples for various surveys. The sample developed for the 2002 National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas) was used as a frame for the selection of the 2002-2003 IDHS sample. Household listing was done in all CBs covered in the 2002 Susenas. This eliminates the need to conduct a separate household listing for the 2002-2003 IDHS. A minimum of 40 CBs per province has been imposed in the 2002-2003 IDHS design. Since the sample was designed to provide reliable indicators for each province, the number of CBs in each province was not allocated proportional to the population of the province nor proportional by urban-rural classification. Therefore, a final weighing adjustment procedure was done to obtain estimates for all domains. The 2002-2003 IDHS sample is selected using a stratified two-stage design consisting of 1,592 CBs. Once the number of households was allocated to each province by urban and rural areas, the number of CBs was calculated based on an average sample take of 25 selected households. All ever-married women age 15-49 in these households are eligible for individual interview. Table B.1 Allocation of census blocks by province Province Number of census blocks 1. North Sumatera 60 2. Riau 50 3. West Sumatera 50 4. Jambi 40 5. South Sumatera 50 6. Bengkulu 40 7. Lampung 50 8. Bangka-Belitung 40 9. DKI Jakarta 82 10. West Java 84 11. Central Java 5 SMP Districts Remaining districts 100 74 12. DI Yogyakarta 66 13. East Java 5 SMP Districts Remaining districts 100 74 14. Banten 66 15. Bali 66 16. West Nusa Tenggara 50 17. East Nusa Tenggara 40 18. West Kalimantan 50 19. Central Kalimantan 40 20. South Kalimantan 50 21. East Kalimantan 40 22. North Sulawesi 50 23. Central Sulawesi 40 24. South Sulawesi 60 25. Southeast Sulawesi 26. Gorontalo 40 40 Total 1,592 Eight households in each CB selected for the women sample were selected for male interview. All currently married men age 15-54 identified in the selected households were interviewed. This sample is designed to provide estimates for the following domains: Indonesia as a whole; Urban and rural areas of Indonesia; Province, for key indicators in the majority of provinces. In each province, the selection of CBs in urban and rural areas was done using multistage stratified sampling. In urban areas, in the first stage, CBs were selected using systematic sampling. In each selected CB, 25 households were randomly selected. In rural areas, the household selection was done in three stages. In the first stage, subdistricts were selected with probability proportional to the number of households. In the second stage, from each selected subdistrict, CBs were selected using systematic sampling. In the third stage, in each cluster, 25 households were randomly selected. 268 Appendix B

In each of the 10 districts in Central Java and East Java, clusters were selected systematically with probability proportional to the number of households. In the second stage, in each CB, 25 households were randomly selected. Results of the household sample implementation by urban-rural residence, by province as well as by male and female subsample are shown in Tables B.2.1 and B.2.2. As shown in Table B.2.1, 34,738 households were selecte d for the 2002-2003 IDHS. Of these, 95 percent were successfully interviewed, 2 percent were not interviewed because there were found to be vacant, and 2 percent were away during the survey fieldworkers visit. Other reasons for not interviewing households include having no competent respondent in the household, the dwelling was not found or the dwelling had been destroyed. The overall household response rate is 99 percent (see Table B.2.1 for definition). The level of successful household interviews ranges from 88 percent in West Kalimantan to 99 percent in Riau. The response rate is slightly higher in rural than in urban areas. Tables B.2.2 presents the survey coverage for women interviews. Of 29,996 women eligible for individual interview, 98 percent were successfully interviewed, 1 percent were not interviewed because they were not at home (see Table B.2.2 for definition). Urban women are as likely as rural women to be interviewed in the survey. The response rate does not vary much by province. The lowest rate is in West Kalimantan (96 percent), while in North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Central Kalimantan, North Sulawesi, and Central Sulawesi it is almost 100 percent. Table B.3.1 shows 10,877 households were selected for male subsample of the 2002-2003 IDHS. This is approximately one in three households selected for the women sample. Ninety-five percent of those households were successfully interviewed, 2 percent were not interviewed because the dweling was vacant and 2 percent were absent during the fieldworkers visit. The overall response rate is 99 percent, ranging from under 88 percent in West Kalimantan to 99-100 percent in Riau, Central Kalimantan, and Central Sulawesi. Table B.3.2 shows that 8,740 eligible men were identified for individual interview and of these, completed interviews were conducted with 8,310 men, yielding a response rate of 95 percent. The principal reason for nonresponse among eligible men was the failure to find them at home despite repeated visits to the household. The lower response rate for men was due to the more frequent and longer absence of men from the household. The level of successful household interviews among the provinces ranges from less than 90 percent in West Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, and South Sulawesi to 99-100 percent in North Sumatera, West Nusa Tenggara, Central Kalimantan, and Central Sulawesi. Appendix B 269

Table B.2.1 Sample implementation: results of the household interview: women Percent distribution of households by results of the household interview, and household response rate, according to urban-rural residence and province, Indonesia 2002-2003 Household present Dwelling but no vacant/ Number competent Dwell- House- address of Household Com- respondent ing not hold not a Dwelling sampled response Residence pleted at home Refused found absent dwelling destroyed Other house- rate and province (C) (HP) (R) (DNF) (HA) (DV) (DD) (O) Total holds (HRR) 1 Residence Urban 94.5 0.4 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.4 0.3 0.2 100.0 14,779 98.7 Rural 95.8 0.4 0.0 0.3 1.7 1.4 0.3 0.1 100.0 19,959 99.3 Sumatera North Sumatera 96.7 0.2 0.4 0.3 1.2 1.1 0.2 0.0 100.0 1,502 99.1 West Sumatera 97.8 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 100.0 1,250 99.5 Riau 99.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,230 99.5 Jambi 98.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,000 99.9 South Sumatera 98.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.1 100.0 1,247 99.4 Bengkulu 96.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 998 99.9 Lampung 96.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.6 0.3 0.0 100.0 1,248 99.8 Bangka-Belitung 89.9 0.3 0.2 0.9 3.2 4.7 0.7 0.1 100.0 1,000 98.5 Java DKI Jakarta 94.3 0.2 0.1 1.2 1.1 2.5 0.2 0.3 100.0 2,049 98.3 West Java 93.2 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.8 2.8 0.5 0.2 100.0 2,102 98.5 Central Java 97.6 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.0 100.0 1,848 99.4 DI Yogyakarta 94.5 1.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 3.1 0.2 0.1 100.0 1,648 98.8 East Java 97.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.2 0.2 0.0 100.0 1,842 99.7 Banten 93.0 0.3 0.3 1.8 0.5 3.7 0.4 0.1 100.0 1,650 97.5 Bali and Nusa Tenggara Bali 94.7 0.5 0.1 0.4 2.1 1.3 0.4 0.5 100.0 1,650 99.0 West Nusa Tenggara 95.9 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.5 0.2 0.1 100.0 1,249 99.5 East Nusa Tenggara 97.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 100.0 990 99.4 Kalimantan West Kalimantan 87.9 2.7 0.1 0.1 3.7 4.8 0.7 0.0 100.0 1,245 96.8 Central Kalimantan 98.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.2 100.0 1,000 99.7 South Kalimantan 91.4 0.3 0.1 0.6 3.5 2.6 1.0 0.4 100.0 1,250 98.9 East Kalimantan 93.5 0.3 0.4 0.9 3.6 1.1 0.2 0.0 100.0 997 98.3 Sulawesi North Sulawesi 94.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.8 100.0 1,253 98.2 Central Sulawesi 98.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.3 100.0 998 99.5 South Sulawesi 92.3 0.3 0.0 0.2 4.6 2.1 0.4 0.1 100.0 1,494 99.4 Southeast Sulawesi 97.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 998 100.0 Gorontalo 95.4 0.2 0.1 0.9 1.2 1.9 0.3 0.0 100.0 1,000 98.8 Total 95.3 0.4 0.1 0.5 1.5 1.8 0.3 0.1 100.0 34,738 99.0 1 Using the number of households falling into specific response categories, the household response rate (HRR) is calculated as: 100 * C C + HP + P + R + DNF 270 Appendix B

Table B.2.2 Sample implementation: results of the household interview: women Percent distribution of eligible women by results of the individual interview, and eligible women and overall response rates, according to urban-rural residence and province, Indonesia 2002-2003 Eligible Partly women Overall Com- Not com- Incapaci- Number response response Residence pleted at home Refused pleted tated Other of rate rate and province (C) (EWNH) (R) (EWPC) (EWI) (EWO) Total women (EWRR) 1 (ORR) 2 Residence Urban 98.3 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 100.0 12,537 98.3 96.9 Rural 98.3 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 100.0 17,459 98.3 97.6 Sumatera North Sumatera 99.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 100.0 1,403 99.7 98.8 West Sumatera 97.9 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,130 97.9 97.4 Riau 97.4 1.8 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 100.0 1,170 97.4 96.9 Jambi 98.3 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.4 100.0 1,035 98.3 98.2 South Sumatera 99.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,247 99.6 99.0 Bengkulu 99.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 879 99.1 99.0 Lampung 98.5 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,066 98.5 98.3 Bangka-Belitung 97.6 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 100.0 663 97.6 96.1 Java DKI Jakarta 99.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 100.0 1,901 99.0 97.3 West Java 97.7 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.0 100.0 1,680 97.7 96.2 Central Java 98.1 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 100.0 1,599 98.1 97.5 DI Yogyakarta 98.8 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,043 98.8 97.6 East Java 97.9 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 100.0 1,537 97.9 97.6 Banten 98.9 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 100.0 1,398 98.9 96.5 Bali and Nusa Tenggara Bali 98.8 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 100.0 1,388 98.8 97.8 West Nusa Tenggara 98.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 100.0 967 98.7 98.2 East Nusa Tenggara 98.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 100.0 856 98.0 97.4 Kalimantan West Kalimantan 96.0 2.2 0.8 0.1 0.6 0.2 100.0 959 96.0 93.0 Central Kalimantan 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 100.0 912 99.7 99.4 South Kalimantan 97.2 2.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 100.0 1,039 97.2 96.1 East Kalimantan 97.2 2.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 100.0 850 97.2 95.5 Sulawesi North Sulawesi 99.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 100.0 1,070 99.7 97.9 Central Sulawesi 99.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,021 99.7 99.2 South Sulawesi 95.5 3.5 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 100.0 1,121 95.5 95.0 Southeast Sulawesi 98.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 100.0 1,034 98.9 98.9 Gorontalo 96.6 2.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.5 100.0 1,028 96.6 95.4 Total 98.3 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 100.0 29,996 98.3 97.3 1 Using the number of eligible women falling into specific response categories, the eligible woman response rate (EWRR) is calculated as: 2 The overall response rate (ORR) is calculated as: 100 * C EWC + EWNH + EWP + EWR + EWPC + EWI + EWO ORR = HR * EWRR/100 Appendix B 271

Table B.3.1 Sample implementation: results of the household interview: men Percent distribution of households selected for the male subsample by results of the household interview, and household response rates, according to urban-rural residence and province Indonesia 2002-2003 Household present Dwelling but no vacant/ Number competent Dwell- House- address of Household Com- respondent ing not hold not a Dwelling sampled response Residence pleted at home Refused found absent dwelling destroyed Other house- rate and province (C) (HP) (R) (DNF) (HA) (DV) (DD) (O) Total holds (HRR) 1 Residence Urban 94.8 0.5 0.2 0.4 1.4 2.5 0.2 0.1 100.0 4,642 99.0 Rural 95.8 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.6 1.5 0.4 0.1 100.0 6,235 99.4 Sumatera North Sumatera 96.8 0.0 0.4 0.2 1.3 1.1 0.2 0.0 100.0 465 99.3 West Sumatera 98.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 100.0 394 99.7 Riau 99.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 389 99.5 Jambi 97.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 318 99.7 South Sumatera 98.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0 100.0 393 99.7 Bengkulu 95.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 303 100.0 Lampung 96.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.0 100.0 390 99.7 Bangka-Belitung 90.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 4.1 4.7 0.3 0.0 100.0 319 99.3 Java DKI Jakarta 94.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.3 3.0 0.2 0.2 100.0 624 99.3 West Java 93.9 0.4 0.3 0.1 2.4 2.5 0.3 0.0 100.0 671 99.1 Central Java 98.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 100.0 583 99.5 DI Yogyakarta 94.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.2 0.8 0.0 100.0 524 99.2 East Java 97.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.1 1.4 0.2 0.0 100.0 555 99.8 Banten 93.5 0.4 0.0 1.7 0.4 3.4 0.4 0.2 100.0 523 97.8 Bali and Nusa Tenggara Bali 93.8 1.5 0.2 0.2 1.7 1.5 0.4 0.6 100.0 518 98.0 West Nusa Tenggara 95.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 2.9 0.5 0.0 100.0 377 99.4 East Nusa Tenggara 96.4 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.6 0.7 0.0 0.3 100.0 305 99.0 Kalimantan West Kalimantan 88.4 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.6 5.4 0.8 0.0 100.0 389 96.9 Central Kalimantan 99.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 317 100.0 South Kalimantan 91.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 3.3 3.1 1.3 0.3 100.0 390 99.2 East Kalimantan 92.7 0.6 0.3 0.9 3.8 1.3 0.3 0.0 100.0 317 98.0 Sulawesi North Sulawesi 97.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.5 100.0 389 100.0 Central Sulawesi 99.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 318 99.4 South Sulawesi 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 4.7 3.2 0.6 0.2 100.0 471 99.5 Southeast Sulawesi 97.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 316 100.0 Gorontalo 96.9 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 319 99.0 Total 95.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 1.5 1.9 0.3 0.1 100.0 10,877 99.2 1 Using the number of households falling into specific response categories, the household response rate (HRR) is calculated as: 100 * C C + HP + P + R + DNF 272 Appendix B

Table B.3.2 Sample implementation: results of the household interview: men Percent distribution of eligible men by results of the individual interview, and eligible men and overall response rates, according to urbanrural residence and province, Indonesia 2002-2003 Eligible Partly men Overall Com- Not Post- com- Incapaci- Number response response Residence pleted at home poned Refused pleted tated Other of rate rate and province (C) (EMNH) ((EMP) (R) (EMPC) (EMI) (EMO) Total men (EMRR) 1 (ORR) 2 Residence Urban 95.2 3.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.9 100.0 3,736 95.2 94.2 Rural 95.0 4.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 100.0 5,004 95.0 94.4 Sumatera North Sumatera 99.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 100.0 420 99.3 98.6 West Sumatera 88.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 324 88.0 87.7 Riau 94.1 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 100.0 356 94.1 93.6 Jambi 98.0 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 100.0 306 98.0 97.7 South Sumatera 98.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 100.0 396 98.5 98.2 Bengkulu 94.5 2.7 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 2.0 100.0 255 94.5 94.5 Lampung 92.5 6.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 100.0 293 92.5 92.2 Bangka-Belitung 91.6 4.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.3 100.0 214 91.6 91.0 Java DKI Jakarta 98.2 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 100.0 571 98.2 97.6 West Java 94.4 4.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 100.0 485 94.4 93.5 Central Java 96.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 441 96.4 95.9 DI Yogyakarta 94.5 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 307 94.5 93.7 East Java 97.9 1.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 438 97.9 97.8 Banten 95.2 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 100.0 397 95.2 93.1 Bali and Nusa Tenggara Bali 98.5 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 100.0 410 98.5 96.5 West Nusa Tenggara 99.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 240 99.6 99.0 East Nusa Tenggara 91.9 5.5 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.3 100.0 236 91.9 91.0 Kalimantan West Kalimantan 87.6 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.8 100.0 259 87.6 84.9 Central Kalimantan 99.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 100.0 291 99.3 99.3 South Kalimantan 88.3 8.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 1.8 100.0 273 88.3 87.5 East Kalimantan 87.0 10.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.9 100.0 261 87.0 85.2 Sulawesi North Sulawesi 98.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 329 98.8 98.8 Central Sulawesi 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 100.0 323 99.7 99.1 South Sulawesi 84.5 11.6 0.3 2.6 0.0 0.6 0.3 100.0 310 84.5 84.1 Southeast Sulawesi 98.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 100.0 321 98.4 98.4 Gorontalo 93.3 2.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.1 2.5 100.0 284 93.3 92.4 Total 95.1 3.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.6 100.0 8,740 95.1 94.3 1 Using the number of eligible men falling into specific response categories, the eligible man response rate (EWRR) is calculated as: 2 The overall response rate (ORR) is calculated as: 100 * C EMC + EMNH + EMP + EMR + EMPC + EMI + EMO ORR = HR * EMRR/100 Appendix B 273

B.3 PRETEST BPS piloted the questionnaire, control form, and manuals in August 2002 to detect any possible problems in the translations or flow of the questionnaire, as well as to gauge the length of time required for interviews. Another important objective of the pretest was to gain experience in field operations and interviewing men, because for the first time IDHS included individual interviews with men. The pretest took place in two provinces, Jambi and South Kalimantan. Pretest training took place from August 1-18, 2002 with the last day spent to train the supervisors and editors to perform their tasks. The training was conducted following the IDHS training procedures, including class presentations, mock interviews, field practice and tests. The training included practice interviews using the questionnaire in Bahasa Indonesia and the local dialect. In each province, 12 people were trained, forming two teams, each consisting of one male supervisor, one female field editor, three female interviewers and one male interviewer. All trainees were employees of BPS field offices. Pretest fieldwork lasted for a week (August 22-30, 2002). Fieldwork was conducted in both urban and rural settings. In South Kalimantan, one urban and two rural census blocks were visited. In each census block, 25 households were selected. These households were interviewed using the Household Questionnaires, where all ever-married women age 15-49 and currently married males age 15-54 were identified. In all selected census blocks, a total of 150 households were visited, 75 in Jambi and 75 in South Kalimantan. The survey instruments were finalized following discussions with the National Family Planning Coordinating Board and and the Ministry of Health. B.4 TRAINING A total of 530 persons, 362 women and 168 men, participated in the main survey training for interviewers. Training for 23 provinces took place September 30 through October 17, 2002, while for the three new provinces, training was held in February 2003. The training was conducted following the DHS training procedures including class presentations, mock interviews, and tests. All of the participants were trained using the Women s Questionnaire. Once the materials for the women interview were completed, the male participants were trained in conducting an interview using the Men s Questionnaire. The training included practice interviews in Bahasa Indonesia and participant s local language. B.5 FIELDWORK The 2002-2003 IDHS data was collected by 94 interviewing teams. Each team consisted of one team supervisor, one field editor, three female interviewers and one male interviewer. Field operations took place over a five-and-a-half-month period, from October 21, 2002 to April 9, 2003. In most provinces, data collection took a break for at least one month during the Muslim fasting month, which fell in early November through early December 2002. In Riau, fieldwork began only in December 2002. In three provinces, Bangka-Belitung, Banten, and Gorontalo, training of field staff was in March 2003 and data collection took place in April and May 2003. 274 Appendix B B.6 DATA PROCESSING All completed questionnaires for IDHS, accompanied by their control forms, were returned to the BPS central office in Jakarta for data processing. This process consisted of office editing, coding of open-ended questions, data entry, verification, and editing computer-identified errors. A team of about 40 data entry clerks, data editors, and two data entry supervisors processed the data. Data entry and editing started on November 4, 2002 using a computer package program called CSPro, which was specifically designed to process DHS-type survey data. To prepare the data entry programs, two BPS staff spent three weeks in ORC Macro offices in Calverton, Maryland in April 2002.